“All the most horrible and disgusting aspects of the last decades of the twentieth century-the pornography, the sadism, the violence, the moral and spiritual vacuum-were already evidence there.” (Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation – Ronald Reagan 1983)
The majority of lawmakers, who have knowledge that senator Obama aka U.S. President Obama, isn’t properly vetted. The Democrats and Rinos allege that there isn’t a true definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but aren’t telling the truth, so they must have something to hide. In fact, the lawmakers who allege that the vetting laws aren’t a requirement to be a U.S. President sold that bottle of snake oil to 51% of the brainwashed zombies in America and reeks of misrepresentation. Of course, vetting means identifying every person in the USA, especially a U.S. President, a requirement under federal and state Identification laws. An unidentified person can’t lawfully work or hold public office or be paid by the taxpayers, let alone access National Security or even walk into the gates towards the White House. Is the entire Federal Government declaring that anyone can be a U.S. president without producing their certified Identification records, background checks, or produce any credentials? This is a very dangerous path for America.
All credentials are required to be vetted by the government and made transparent for public review including criminal background checks, Passports, Alias Names, Former Addresses, school records, College Degrees, Selective Service Records, Birth Certificates, Student Loans, Driver’s License, Law License, and Tax Returns. On the other hand, it appears that if a legal Americans applies to be a janitor at the White House, he must be fingerprinted, and meet all the identification requirements and background checks as an employee of the government, but not to be a U.S. President in 2008-2009? Remember, the Certification of a U.S. President requires Proper Vetting and Proof that the candidate is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. In fact, all jobs in the USA require proper identification. In the case of Obama, the lawsuits filed and investigations by law enforcement, names Sheriff Arpaio and Detective Zullo and forensic experts, allege that the U.S. Certificate of Live Birth and U.S. Birth Certificate Obama posted online and he and Michelle Obama stated on the Oprah show were legal U.S. government documents makes every natural-born American appear as if he and his colleagues do believe Americans are “stupid” and “foolish” and “easily tricked.”
The controversy over the Obama Birth Certificates is ignored by the DOJ and by the White House and by the Congress. They cared less including the Supreme Court and the Federal Judges. They left the eligibility of Barry Soetoro who stated he was born in Kenya to an audience and wrote and published it in a bio blowing in the wind. If the candidate wasn’t vetted properly then how can the Secretary of State and Speaker Nancy Pelosi sign the Certification for a non-vetted U.S. president? In fact, it’s rumored that Speaker Pelosi altered the wording on the Certification for U.S. President before signing off on Obama’s Certification of being a natural-born American. Why would they do that? Upon lawmakers having knowledge that a public servant isn’t properly vetted, it’s the duty of the lawmakers and law enforcers to properly vet the person, but if they fail to vet with such knowledge, they are willingly, consenting, and in agreement ignoring the vetting policies and identification laws required by federal employment laws, immigration laws, and Article II.
The President, Barack Hussein Obama, who isn’t vetted properly, remains a mystery to Americans, because he hasn’t been required to follow the Rule of Law or uphold Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution (to the best of my knowledge) and produce a certified U.S. Birth Certificate. Obama has been admitted into the oval office for a second term even though two television stations shockingly reported his winning percentages on national television before the elections were held. And, it just so happened coincidentally that alternative news reported that Mr.Hagel owned electronic voting machine companies (now elevated to Secretary of Defense) and the federal government has documented testimony and reports that electronic voting machines can be rigged. During his speech on November 6, 2012, Obama said something quite shocking. He said, We, the American people – will “rise and fall together.” His statement made me say, “Ouch! Should we do as the Romans, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, or learn from the history books?” (refer to the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse at amazon.com).
Should we, as Americans, inquire into the question if America is on the road to heaven or the road to hell? For example, the immoral and inappropriate television shows produced for children influence young minds negatively. The violent video games encouraging violence can cause some kids to believe this is normal. The teaching that suicide and death is good may cause some kids to follow through and try it. The promotion of euthanasia for the sick and elderly under ObamaCare should be a frightening and immoral law to Americans. Mandated Abortions worldwide promoted by Obama’s Executive Orders for the poor and U.S. Natural Born Citizens as women’s rights. Mandated Taxpayer Funded Abortions is immoral and reduces the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens as well as natural born of Third World Nations such as Kenya requiring Americans to pick up the tab worldwide to slaughter future unborn babies. The push to eliminate heterosexual lifestyles and traditional marriage under the Obama regime is a serious problem for Americans and is an attack on the foundation of a civilized nation. The disrespect for the sick and the elderly, the veterans, and the military, whose benefits are being placed at risk under Obama’s regime will cause hardship. All these issues are signs of a nation being taken into a very dark place as history has proven repeatedly. The attack on Christians, Catholics, and Jews is a very serious problem for America, Israel and Western Civilization as well as Muslims who convert, Coptic Christians, Jews, and Christians.. Only those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and lips to speak the truth, shall not be blinded by this unseen web of evil reptilian deceit that has been woven around the United States of America. How then shall we break out or is it too late? (refer to the political satire, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals at amazon.com).
In my humble opinion, I don’t believe that Americans listen closely to Obama’s words. His words have meanings, but his supporters are too busy cheering for a free phone or free cash or cars for clunkers to pay attention to what he said. Was he referring to the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire during his second term speech that should have sent chills down the spine of every loyal red, white, and blue American when he spoke those words? Is his true vision of America and that of his alleged foreign-born Kenyan father based on their belief that America is oppressive and Americans are spoiled and “revenge” is the goal? This should raise the question if his stated goal to fulfill the dreams of his real father and his own dreams, as well as his radical mentors, a part of the redistribution of America’s wealth to himself, cronies, banksters, and the Middle East in the amount of $16 Trillion, which future generations, must pay back? And, the news reported a recent lawsuit filed by a prominent law firm against public servants in positions of power who are named in an alleged $43 Trillion money laundering scandal involving America’s tax funded Tarp program.
Furthermore, Obama said we are all in this together, the illegals, and the Black slaves, but Thomas Jefferson must be rolling over in his grave, because Jefferson didn’t treat the Blacks inhumanely, who were working and living on his plantation as slaves, but he treated them as human beings. But, Obama on one hand wants to provide entitlements to illegals at taxpayer’s expense in exchange for votes, and on the other hand, possibly arrest American business owners who hire illegals even though business owners aren’t trained law enforcement agents.
Therefore, Abraham Lincoln, who adamantly opposed slavery, abolished it during the civil war. Thomas Jefferson housed, fed and clothed 600 Black slaves in their separate cabins on his estate and he taught them to read, as one of the requirements when working on his plantation. These two Founding Fathers must be rolling over in their graves since slavery and illegal immigration are violations of the federal laws and the Rule of Law and slavery has been prohibited on U.S. soil since the civil war. Where does any person see Blacks enslaved or chained on U.S. soil today? In fact, Obama, who says he’s Black, not White, is quite wealthy since the elections of 2008. And, Oprah, a Black woman, hit the news as one of the wealthiest women in the nation.
Remember, words matter and if Obama’s words lead the nation and the world to think that Americans discriminate against Blacks and treat them as slaves or discriminate against Hispanics, than that is not helpful to the image of the United States of America. Such a message doesn’t create peace among citizens, but polarize citizens. The truth is that Americans marched with Martin Luther King during the 1960s and fought for civil rights for the Black Americans. In fact, Mexico and America were allies until the federal government failed to enforce the borders. This administration has encouraged illegals to enter into the U.S. and promised the illegals entitlements so the illegals believe that they are entitled to live in America without going through legal immigration procedures. I don’t support profiling, but if the borders were secured as required by federal law then the issue of illegal immigration would diminish.
Furthermore, if Americans were enslaving Black Americans or discriminating against Blacks and Hispanics, there are U.S. laws that people can pursue to help protect themselves from discrimination. How is it that he doesn’t talk about the discrimination against Americans and Christians and Jews by the Muslim world?
Should Americans then not ask how is it that Barack Hussein Obama has been admitted into the White House for two terms and holds himself out as a Black man, knowing he’s a Mulatto, prove him to be prejudice against his other half of his own genetic race? Doesn’t such behavior make comments about Black slavery moot after being admitted to the highest office in the land as an non-vetted Black U.S. President? Also, a large number of Black Americans and more ethnic citizens have been elected into public office in recent years which renders this a land of opportunity for all. Ireland, a majority of whites, support Obama, so where’s the discrimination against Black Americans? The fact is that the American people believe that public servants must be held accountable should they be involved in scandals or violate the Rule of Law, including Article II, Section 1, accordingly, so if demanding that constitutional law be upheld is racists then it will only be racists in the eyes of those who are guilty and oppose upholding the Rule of Law. The accusations against public servants on any and all levels shouldn’t be dismissed no more than accusations against average citizens accused of wrong doing by this regime. There are many Blacks and a good number of Hispanics working in the White House. A liberal Hispanic woman has been appointed into the Supreme Court which proves that America is a land of opportunity for all people who strive for a better life.
How is it okay for public servants to allow people they favor to violate constitutional law and not hold them accountable, but punish law-abiding legal Americans based on an accusation for the same violation of the law even if innocent? Any public servant who violates the Code of Ethics or the Rule of Law should not be excused from their actions because of their race or ethnicity. It is true that political speeches can pit people against each other and divide Americans. Speeches read by public servants from the White House should be taken seriously when they are pitting Black and White Americans against each other.
Therefore, Public Servants shouldn’t be allowed to exempt themselves, or hold themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, no matter what their race, or ethnicity. Public Servants should not be allowed by law to exempt congress, illegals, union members, refugees, or foreign immigrants from complying with the pay-up-front unconstitutional mandates or excessive penalties implemented by ObamaCare or for Traffic Tickets or Court Fines, City and County fines, or excessive taxes or excessive tax penalties. If a law is good enough for the American people then it should be good enough for all public servants unless they admit that they aren’t U.S. citizens. Only criminals and Non-Citizens and Foreigners whose goal it is to change America into the foreign nation as they unlawfully hold themselves above Constitutional Laws.
In conclusion, the pattern of unconstitutional and unethical agendas that began in the 1990’s through 2015 are creating a majority of Americans who don’t trust their legislatures. They have failed to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Sovereignty and allowed the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and failed to fund small businesses and create jobs for 7 years for legal Americans. In fact, they have a pattern of attacking Americans who took the risk to build a business and employ Americans. Americans were shocked when they witnessed the United States Congressional members led by Senators McCain, Graham, and Levin, shove the NDAA Law down the throats of Americans. The Democratic and RINO Congress shoved the Patriot Act and Obamacare down the throats of the taxpayers against the objections of the majority of Americans. These laws are in opposition of U.S. Constitutional Laws and appear to target Americans, not so much foreign enemies. (This article may be shared but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). [Follow – Reblog – Comment Below]
Twitter@Rose4Justice, Facebook/RoseColombo, LinkedIn/Rose4Justice
Website: http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Blogs: http://www.rose4justice.wordpress.com
Books: 1) Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help at amazon.com
Books: 2) Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, political satire at amazon.com
Radio: 1) Rose Colombo N The Justice Club, MWF, 9am-10:30am pst or 12p-1:30pm est-usa, Listen Live Worldwide Online, Podcsts, (347) 324-3704, http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Radio: 2) Women Fight Back, Rose Colombo and Victoria Lee Scott, Every Wednesday, 10:30am-12p pst-use and 1:30pm-3pm est -Listen Live worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-3704 – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice, Pinterest, Digg, Tumblr. Google+
The Revolution Came and the USA Defeated Communism 1945!
written by Rose Colombo, original pub. (c) 5/11/2012, Rev. 6/17/2012
“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?”Ronald Reagan, (pub. Abortion and theConscience of the Nation)On or about February 18, 2009, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General stated, “There will be significant demographic changes this nation never faced…There will be no majority race in the United States in about 15 years…the coming diversity that could be such a powerful positive force will instead become a reason for stagnation and polarization. Although, there is a crying need for all of us to know the contributions of Black Americans, the Black history month is still a testament to the problems that has inflicted African-Americans throughout our stay in the country….Black history is critical to the knowledge of the Black history experiment.”
Although, Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, addressed a majority of Black Americans and students at a college, his comments raise the question if his words reflected distinct statements which could reveal a sinister and secret U.N. Agenda 21 with a stated goal of reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. A major part of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal and Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” focuses upon mandated abortions in America and Third World nations at 50% by the year 2015. Ironically, the news recently disclosed that USAG Holder’s wife owns an abortion clinic which raises the question if Obama’s mandated abortion laws approved by senators Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, in 2007, and the fact that Holder worked under the Clinton administration, is a Conflict of Interest?
Mandated abortions combined with other depopulation agendas such as ObamaCare, which includes taxpayer-funded government mandated abortions in America, also allows for infanticide. Is it possible that mandated Abortions could lead to government mandated abortions, not personal choice, which was implemented by Communist China for about 25 years? China’s leaders determined the female unborn babies would be aborted under their mandated law for depopulation purposes or pregnant women would be punished for non-compliance. Holder’s comments reflect Obama’s Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act aka New millennium Goals, which the non-vetted senator Obama implemented on or about December 7, 2007, and approved without the knowledge of the majority of U.S. citizens.
Should we not raise the question and ask if anyone would want their unborn baby or unborn grand baby to be used for food? Is it morally right to allow corporations to grind up unborn babies aka fetuses and use them for food additives into artificial sweeteners? Is that not to be considered as cannibalism? How many people approve of aborted unborn babies having their brains removed for experimentation as reported in the Orange County Register newspaper as a scandal by a major hospital? Millions of people believe that it’s moral to use unborn babies for stem cell research or for cloning. These statements are part of the reality relating to mandated abortions, which is downplayed by the Obama administration, Wall Street, and the media.
Obviously, mandated abortions increase taxes, and fund Planned Parenthood, and generate big-profits for abortionists, as well as some businesses within the food industry. On or about 2009, my blog informed U.S. citizens that Obama’s Global Poverty Act mandates worldwide abortions, which is in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21, a goal to depopulate the earth at 50%, by the year 2015. Senator Alan Keyes attempted to warn Americans that Obama’s agendas included radical programs. In fact, Senator Obama failed to disclose his obsession with mandated abortions during the elections which I refer to as “Obama’s War on Unborn Babies.” He presented himself as a traditional family man with pro-life agendas when interviewed by Pastor Rick, who later on, incorporated Chrislam into his church. The actions taken against unborn babies worldwide by the non-vetted U.S. Senator and President, Barack Hussein Obama, lead many to believe that he’s the most pro-abortion president to ever hit America.
Furthermore, Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare also includes tax funded mandated abortions against the will of the majority of U.S. citizens. Once again, Obama signed the Global Poverty Act passed on or about December 7, 2007, and he signed it into law as an Executive Order on or about January 2009. The Global Poverty Act is also known as The Millennium Global Goal and there wasn’t objection by the 111th or 112th U.S. Congress. The reason for the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal to reduce the population of the planet under the guise of reducing world poverty and saving the planet. Obama’s worldwide mandated abortion laws target not only the USA, but Third World nations, especially Africa. Obviously, if the federal government and the U.N. successfully reduce the population at 50% by 2015 or 90% by 2027, poverty would be nearly eliminated, but so would mankind. These programs won’t save the planet but destroy the planet. This leads me to ask how many citizens are asking their leaders and the supporters of Agenda 21 on what authority are they secretly implementing a program that includes depopulation and who made them God with the right to determine who lives and who dies.
Recently, in the year 2012, Obama shouted out in the media that women’s rights should include taxpayer-funded entitlements and their right to access Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood abortion clinics. He strongly promotes the right of young women to access free condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the majority of democrats and Rhinos support tax funded Planned Parenthood for-profit abortion clinics. Abortion is big business! It allows the federal government to substantially increase taxes for this big private corporation. Planned Parenthood is similar to a manufacturing business that operates an assembly line of commodities, but in this case, the assembly line’s commodities are pregnant women and unborn babies. Throughout history, mankind built businesses by hunting and killing animals, fishing, and harvesting trees or plants for big profits. But, Planned Parenthood is granted millions of tax dollars under ObamaCare to hunt for commodities known as pregnant women and unborn babies similar to a seamless assembly line for-profit. It is the unborn babies who are becoming the extinct species on the planet.
Remember, there’s more than one way to depopulate the planet, but mandated abortions and same-sex agendas are definitely included as well as radiation. It’s a fact that there’s more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black American communities than anywhere else in America. It appears that Agenda 21 and the Obama administration’s mandated worldwide abortion agendas target the poor, ethnicities, religions, and races, and includes mandating worldwide abortions in Third World nations, such as Africa and India. It appears that Obama’s Global Poverty Act is implemented as an Executive Order titled The Millennium Development Goal which appears to be in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21. The unconstitutional laws implemented recently in the USA appear to be linked into Agenda 21, i.e., ObamaCare, the
Also, under the guise of women’s rights, the Obama administration is focusing on young women, pregnant women, and unborn babies, through the promotion of entitlements such as mandated abortions, and promoting contraception. The Obama regime targeted the Catholic Church and Catholic hospitals, who oppose abortion and the distribution of contraceptives and the morning after pill. The Catholic Church filed a lawsuit against the federal government’s mandated abortions and distribution of contraceptives. Mandated Abortions offends the moral compass of the Catholic religion. Shall we not ask if the U.N.’s Agenda 21 is a program that intends to use U.S. leaders to circumvent the Constitution and the U.S. Congress?
It would appear that such an agenda is implemented to control the masses with the intent of creating a one world government. It’s not possible to create a one world government if U.S. laws aren’t shredded or the borders aren’t opened up for the migration of foreigners. How then is such an agenda not sending up red flags and shocking the minds of every U.S. citizen, as well as citizens around the world, especially citizens living in Third World Nations who are on the radar for depopulation? Furthermore, Communist China mandated the death by abortion of 400,000,000 unborn baby girls for more than two decades. Government mandated abortions is a genocide. Mandated abortions reduces the population of unborn babies who are the future citizens. The U.N. and the U.S. didn’t oppose the mandated abortions in China. In fact, if any pregnant woman attempted to conceal the birth of a baby girl, they were punished. And, the Chinese government’s mandated health care programs required the monitoring of young girl’s menstrual cycles. Hillary Clinton and Diane Feinstein support the U.N.’s Rights of the Child which denies U.S. parents the right to exercise parental rights. This means the all family law matters in the U.S. could be rendered under a U.N. flag versus a U.S. flag as the new one world court.
Once again, the U.N. has been working hand in hand with past and current U.S. Presidents and supporting Congressional members, as well as international leaders who approve of redistributing America’s wealth as well as reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. They are playing God and their goals include mandated abortions, infanticide and partial birth abortions. They believe that the federal government should replace the parents.
Remember, the key supporters of Obama’s worldwide mandated laws were senators Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Clinton, and Kerry and a majority of representatives. After the Global Poverty Act was signed into law, senator Obama immediately filed the application to compete in the presidential race of 2008 even though he previously stated that he was too “inexperienced” to be a U.S. President. Consequently, the U.N.’s Agenda 21is known as a sustainable rural development program using U.S. tax dollars for the redistribution of America’s wealth with the alleged goal of re-developing Third World nations by wealthy banksters. The question should be pondered if the globalists are successful at depopulating the targeted nations how then shall mankind live, but only as slaves? Thus, if there are traitors in the nation who are working to polarize and destroy America by comforting and abetting the enemy and supplying them with money and military defenses how then shall the American people stop this evil machine?
Also, there are rumors that the government might install vending machines into every school stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Well, Obama promised change and change has come to America under the guise of women’s rights, the war on terrorism, and health care. The truth is that the liberal agenda began back in the 1970s, when the feminists, who were mostly same-sex women, encouraged women not to have more than two kids. The feminists influenced young married women that motherhood was a thankless job as well as being a housewife. The feminists managed to make young married women feel guilty about being a wife and mother and caused them to feel that they should be out working. They encouraged young wives and mothers to get out of the house – get divorced – go out and work – under the guise of equal rights. President Reagan, warned women that equal rights for women would result in a new struggle for women, especially single mothers, in the future. He also warned against Pro-Choice laws. In fact, Americans criticize China for passing a law that says they can’t have more than one child, but we aren’t far behind telling American women not to have more than two kids and that they should abort their babies instead of putting the babies up for adoption.
Americans complain there’s fewer U.S. Natural Born Citizens on U.S. soil. That’s true. There are fewer births of U.S. natural Born citizens today, because foreigners don’t take contraceptives. Most foreigners aren’t aborting millions of unborn babies. They intend to have large families. America has aborted about 70,000,000 plus babies since Roe v. Wade was approved and we disgusted by Hitler? We’re stabbing babies sin the head and ripping apart their body parts and selling them for profit and experiments, but we send people to jail for harming an animal, and yes, protect animals, but what about human beings? We are killing our future U.S. Natural Born Citizens who are needed to preserve the United States of America for only the natural born citizens of a civilization can preserve their civilization, traditions, laws, culture, and sovereignty.
Furthermore, scientists and researchers around the world willingly use the fetuses for experiments, stem cell research, or cloning. They are alleged to be selling body parts, organs, and human tissue which is against the law. Great Britain was the first country to receive licensing for cloning. It’s imperative that citizens of the world and Western civilization question if mandated abortions is a sinister program that is being carried out by the secret globalists under the guise of women’s rights. They appear to seek world power and control through unprecedented mandates that go against God, the Bible, and morality. These mandates include excessive regulations, and cruel and unusual taxation and punishments with the intent of reaching their globalist goal with their hope for change and transformation of the USA and the world. Is freedom and liberty and God-given unalienable rights an illusion, or is a One World Order an illusion. The goal of the globalist appears to be a one world superior race – slave vs. master – a one world leader – and a collective global utopia? (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). Scroll Down to the bottom of the page to Like, Share, & Comment
Follow Facebook/Rose Colombo or
Facebook/The Justice Club – Twitter Twitter@Rose4Justice
Website http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Blogs: http://www.rose4justice.com
Books: Irwin Award Winner and 5 Star Review: Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help featured around the world -www.amazon.com
Books: Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals- 5 Star Political Satire – http://www.amazon.com
Radio: The Justice Club – MWF -9am-10:30am pst and 12-1:30pm est-usa -google Freedomizer Radio at blogtalkradio -listen worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-34704 – Follow – Share – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Public Speaker csontact Rose4Jusice@verizon.net – Rose has been a guest speaker at the L.A. Press Club Speakers Bureau, Granada Forum, Chambers of Commerce, DOJ Criminal Planning; California Senate, community groups, and the Pro-Justice Summit
Other: Social Media and You Tube
“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”
Wake up, America! How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land? It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a restructured set of laws replacing freedom and liberty, in my opinion. ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!
In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must notgo down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”
After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers. A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period! There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress.
So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval? Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself – the authority to conceal his identity from the government – and from the public. It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval. When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land? This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval? Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?
Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law? This makes it very difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge, Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.
The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent foreign and anti-American usurpers from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President. It is the birthright of every U.S. Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected. The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions, and for the preservation of Western Civilization so future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.
For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America. He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions. Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority.
A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions. Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education. All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens.
A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.”
Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation? It appears to me that the American people should be very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law. How is that?
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections. The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place. In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.
Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit. On the day of the inauguration about January 2009, Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech. Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV. A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.
But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II, the question remains if he intended to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal? Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself the authority to conceal his identification records from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals? So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?
Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical? After all, Article II requires identification of the public servant and proof that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.
On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws. Thus, how is an amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to alter Article II to the 111th Congress and seek Congressional approval?
So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record. The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.
Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses. After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor. The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections. And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual. After the elections of 2008, published records from the Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record. If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information.
As I stated, this begs the question of why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II be considered an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?
These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth. And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President. Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.
How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens. ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved. The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims, SEIU union members, possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals. So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty, then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?
In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.
ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation. Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off taxes of the hard working American citizens. ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.
Therefore, I have three questions: 1) How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress? 2) How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people; 3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare? (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices. She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices. Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –
Rose Colombo, hits the news…. with her Irwin Award-Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” sold and featured worldwide
Follow and Share. Like and Comment at bottom of the page or read comments by readers at the end of the article
The Bible states, “Woe to you lawyers!’ Luke 11:46
The definition of a U.S. Natural Born or Native Born Citizen as defined in the Constitution referred to as a requirement of Article II and references the Law of Nations, pub. by Emerich de Vattel, 1758 – written into the U.S. Constitution for definition as well as the Declaration of Independence as follows:
“The U.S. natural-born citizen of a nation is a baby born to two U.S. natural-born citizens whose baby is born on U.S. soil at the time of birth.” In addition, “for if he is born of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth and not his country.”
Wake up, America! Ring the Liberty Bell loud and clear. The Liberty Bell is ringing out with alarm warning Americans that their U.S. Constitution is being shredded by a man, whose eligibility is in question as president of the United States Barack Hussein Obama is by-passing congress and the constitution and writing Executive Orders that deny access to Article II and Article IV without Congress invoking their authority to Repeal those executive orders. He’s writing E.O. in secret to migrate millions of Muslims linked to Hamas, a terrorist group, into the USA using U.S. tax dollars. Article II and Article IV are blowing in the wind in an ugly direction. In fact, by Obama’s own writings and admission, he states that his father is “foreign-born” – a subject of Britain at the time of Obama’s birth – making Obama a subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948. Such improper vetting which has been brought before the court and congress does not reflect transparency and is not in accordance with Article II, thus leaving his eligibility without proper vetting and congressional certification as required by constitutional law, Article II, unresolved. by the Democratic-RINO Congressional members, but why?
Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and U.S. Justices applying which would justify their decision to avoid Article II, a very important law of the land, as it involves the highest office in the land? Has the U.S. Congress relinquished their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, country, the flag? Is the Constitution suspended or revoked? They appear to be intentionally ignoring their sworn oath and fiduciary duty as they avoid and ignore Article II which remains of serious public interest to the American people. For example, since 2008, the congress continues to pass laws which the majority of Americans do not believe are in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of legal taxpaying Americans. The Democratic and Rino Congress appear to be boldly refusing to perform their fiduciary duty as they bow down to Obama and kiss his ring and pass laws that affect the lives and livelihood and freedom of every American by their “Gross Negligence” and intentional faiure to read the proposed laws by their own admittance such as Obamacare, but instead, they appear to be taking bribes for votes and engaging in Insider trading and taking No-Bid Contracts to build their family’s personal wealth.
In fact, the majority of Americans believe that the NDAA Law, the Patriot Act, mandated abortions, assassinations and hit lists and indefinite detention of Americans based on accusations only are unconstitutional. Also, ObamaCare is not in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of Americans. Yet, the 111th congress didn’t seem to care as they passed unread laws that deny freedom and liberty under the guise of health care and approved “Death to America” as it includes “death panels for Americans only and punishment for Americans who don’t pay up!” The Muslims and Illegals do not have to sign up, pay up or be punished. The Congress, Obama’s, Justices, Bundlers, Donors, SEIU, Muslims, and Illegals are being held above the law and do not have to comply with the 27000 pages of the unread rubber stamped “approved” mandates, excessive taxes, and punishments including in Obamacare.
In fact, they didn’t hold Obama and the executive office accountable for firing off 220 Tomahawks at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk to the American taxpayers without congressional approval firing off at Libya, who never threatened America, as well as killing civilians; women, children, and Freedom Fighters. They didn’t hold Obama accountable for granting $40M and an additional $535 Millions to Obama’s bundler, a co-owner of Solyndra, who took excessive wages and bonuses before bankrupting Solyndra. Anything wrong with this picture, America?
And, there’s the missing billion or so granted to the IMF! The Missing billions from the Pentagon and State Department! How about the Recovery Funds promised for 350,000 Infrastructure Jobs with knowledge that the promised jobs to Americans to repair the Infrastructure never existed?
Or how about the Recovery Funds promised for those Infrastructure jobs divertedd over to Eric Holder’s Department under his watch used for a program called “Fast and Furious” when hundreds of innocent people along the borders were murdered for 2 years and until the two Border Patrol Officers were murdered with US guns, the program was halted. How is that justified when human life is no longer considered “sacred,” but “meaningless” and the government uses taxpayer funds to hire straw men to sell untracked guns and traffic them into Mexico and sell them to cartels without tracking the cartels which is Law Enforcement 101?
Ring the Liberty Bell! Is USA Being High Jacked?
Shall we then determine if the congress, senate, Justices, and federal judges, are working for or against the American Citizens by their actions? The entire government is a majority of Lawyers as Judges and Justices are lawyers, too, The American people keep voting for lawyers into Congress and into the Oval Office, even disbarred lawyers who violated the law. The nation is run by lawyers! Lawyers are a self-policing, self-disciplining, and self-protecting brotherhood. These lawyers and Judges have knowledge of the definition of a U.S. Natural Born citizen at their finger tips known as the Law of Nations! How is it they knew the definition until Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro was slipped into office?
What then shall we say to our children and grandchildren when America’s history is changed and inserted with false foreign history and our nation’s constitutional laws are shredded and blowing in the wind as they migrate millions of foreign enemies under the guise of “Christian Refugees” into the USA even though in 2009, there weren’t any Christian Refugees fleeing ISIS? Why would young healthy males be allowed into the USA as Muslim Refugees – who are they fleeing?
How do we respond to the questions of our children and grandchildren and future generations who may never know about the Founding Fathers, U.S. History, and those who died to make America Great, Free, and Sovereign? Do we say, “We could have done some thing, but we did nothing?” Should we say, “We could have said some thing, but we remained silent?” Should we say, “We should have thrown the bums out, but we were fearful?” Is it not true that our non-vetted U.S. President with knowledge that vetting is required by Article II is a man, who concealed his identity from the world and the highest offices of government, as well as the American people, the only exception in 239 years?
Obama admitted that his lifetime hope and change is about fulfilling his father’s dreams, but that seems impossible since he admittedly only saw his dad once. His biological father, Barack Hussein Obama is reported in the news as a man who was already married to 3 Kenyan women with two children, yet, Obama’s account is that Obama, sr. was married to Obama’s white mother. Stanley Ann Dunham, on or about 1961, who was a Communist and part Jew, according to researchers as well as American born. Where is the proof that she married a foreign Muslim man in the USA who was already married with children in Kenya? How could she remarry without divorce papers filed in the USA? On the other hand, if Barack Hussein Obama, sr., married Stanley Ann Dunham on U.S. soil, he would have committed violated his sharia law. He would have committed “Bigamy” and committed a fraud upon his mother. So, the question remains, if his white mother married a Kenyan Muslim man who was already married with children than the question raised is did Stanley Ann Dunham have knowledge of the marriage or if Barack Obama sr. who committed a fraud upon Stanley Ann Dunham while studying in the United States on a foreign student loan at taxpayer’s expense and why did he transfer to Harvard since Obama is alleged to have been “elected” as the President of the Harvard Review when Elena Kagan was Dean and involved in assisting in a project accepting millions of dollars donated by the Saudi Prince in exchange to insert Muslim studies. Why would Harvard and Georgetown be accepting donations from a foreign enemy nation at the time it appears that Obama was being groomed?
In fact Barack Obama, Sr., an adult married man with children would have engaged in sexual relations with a white minor child at that time in the USA. which was a crime as there were strict segregation laws in the USA. This occurred before any civil rights movement changed any segretation laws. The history of segregation up through the civil rights movement and even thereafter had been tightly enforced. In fact, up through through the late 60’s, if a Black man was seen with a white woman, riots could break out. If Obama senior married Stanley Ann Dunham, a white minor child, it would have taken place at a time when a Black man with a young white woman would have been a violation of segregation laws and taken to court. I only point that out because this fairy tale story doesn’t make any sense about Obama and his alleged parents. However, Obama aka Barry Soetoro, presents his story as if there weren’t any racial problems or objections and no one noticed his parents having an affair.
Obama’s on-line birth certificate lists his dad as African at the time of his birth, but Americans point out that there wasn’t any such race in America at that time designed to be “African,” as a race. The term African-American wasn’t introduced until the early 1980’s. But, if his biological father was born in Africa then it would be correct to list his race as African, which confirms that his father is foreign-born, and a subject of Britain at Obama’s birth in 1961. Unfortunately, the birth certificates provided on-line are alleged to be forgeries or fakes and altered by forensic experts. Nevertheless, that would mean that Obama Senior passed his birthright onto Obama as a Black African Kenyan from Muslim roots and a Subject of Great Britain at birth, not as a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.
Also, several news articles report that Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., attended Harvard Law School on a foreign student loan, but Obama points out that his father believed America was an oppressive nation, so why would he come to America and what did he study? Perhaps, this is one of the reasons that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro stated about 2008 that other nations believe that America is an oppressive nation so he didn’t want to wear “that pin” the U.S. Flag, on his lapel or sing the National Anthem and place his hand on his heart. Obama believes that America must be transformed and that he’s been placed in power to bring hope and change and “redistribute” America’s wealth as he sees fit, as he stated that he is accountable to no one. His mission appears to be to fund the Muslim Brotherhood and its networks and does that make him their leader and mentor? After all, his glued to his hip sidekick is Valerie Jarrett whose long time generational family is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Ayers family and Chicago.
After his dad returned to Kenya, the Kenyan news reported that Obama sr. was killed in a car accident. In the book Dreams of My Father, Obama inferred that he is troubled by his mother’s race, but he is working on his problem. Therefore, it’s only logical to conclude by Obama’s own admission that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., was foreign-born in Kenya and a Subject of Britain making Obama ineligible to be a President of the USA legally and constitutionally. He’s stated the same in his speeches and that he was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro and attended school a Catholic School in Indonesia, but it’s also noted that only Islamic studies can be taught in Indonesia and not Catholicism or Christianity or the person could be subject to a death sentence. In fact, upon marriage, the child relinquishes their US Citizenship and must be registered as an Indonesian Citizen in order to attend school and study only Islamic studies.
Questions Missed by Journalists Researching This Issue: I noted that not one Journalist, to my knowledge, asked the question if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro could it be that Lolo Soetoro is the biological dad since, he too, attended the University of Hawaii at the same time as Stanley Ann and Obama, sr.? How about the fact which should be noted that if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, while residing in Indonesia, that their law makes Obama an automatic citizen of Indonesia upon marriage and only an Indonesian Citizen at that time could attend school in Indonesia. Another interesting point that Journalists missed is that if Stanley Ann married Lolo Soetoro, then wouldn’t she have to convert as a Muslim, under their Sharia Law? Radicals are’t allowed to marry unless the spouse converts. And, of course, there are those who believe that Obama is the son of Malcolm X and his name in Hawaii on a recorded traffic warrant read, “Barri or Bari Shabazz” which was reported to have been dismissed 25 years later, while he was a non-vetted active President of the USA.
Well then,shall we just shred Article II as another “meaningless” law since congress has not invoked their powers to protect Article II, Article IV, or preserve Due Process of Law? Due Process of Law was established by our Forefathers and it is the only protection from tyranny that shields the American people when falsely accused of being an enemy; non-compliant, dangerous, or extremist.
The only want foreign enemies can succeed is to implement the “Kill List” and “NDAA Law” and “Hate Crimes Bill” that only protects the foreign enemy invaders which are created to deny “Due Process of Law” to Americans and silence all Americans from saying anything about the foreign enemy invaders. Ask yourself if the law enforcers and the government’s military forces should be able to knock down your doors and drag you into the streets and execute you or indefinitely detain you in an unknown facility like a FEMA Camp or throw you on a FEMA train without charges filed, without a lawyer, and without a trial? Are you aware that doors are knocked down at gun point in America without the approval and oversight of a Judge?
The NDAA Law that Obama and Holder and Congress implemented denies “Due Process of Law” to all Americans and if targeted by the government and accused, makes us no different than a Third World Nation under a tyrannical dictator. The reason America is exceptional is because the Framers established 3 branches of government for Checks and Balances and established “Due Process of Law.” Knocking down doors at gun point happens in America based on accusations and innocent people have been injured or killed, even children? Are you aware that this happened during Katrina.
In fact, certain police officers shot and killed innocent homeless Americans standing on a bridge. In fact on or about April 2012, three of the shooters were sentenced to imprisonment and one police officer, who didn’t kill anyone was given a lighter sentence. Remember, there Americans, including seniors were forced out of their homes and the Bush administration ordered the enforcers to search their homes for guns during this natural disaster! Even seniors were removed from their homes and on video being manhandled. Tens thousand people were locked inside the New Orleans dome and denied the right to leave. They were indefinitely detained. And, there were reports swept under the carpet of hospital patients having been euthanized.
Is theGreat Republic being diminishedand brought to her knees by tyrannical laws; such as the NDAA Law, and the Patriot Act, or the Rapiscam, oops, I mean the Rapiscan full body naked x-ray and radiationscanner operated by unlicensed techs by a thug like system of being thrown into the microwave oven and naked radiated or else choose door #2 and upon entry submit to have a TSA worker who could be moles since they found them in the White House who grope you and your children and parents as well as unlicensed health care professionals at airports? Even x-ray Techs and Doctors must ask for a signature and consent to touch you or x-ray you! Sheriffs, must have gone through the academy and earned a badge! Americans can be punished for non-compliance(non-compliance is a term used by socialists), yet the Muslims are exempted?
How is it that ObamaCare which is not a law, nor is it about health care, but more about death to Americans and unborn future natural born Americans. It’s 2700 pages of unread mandates and punishments. It’s an umbrella with a set of laws that have nothing to do with health care. Obamacare includes hundreds of new restructured laws, regulations, mandates, punishments for Americans who aren’t favored and opted out are having every freedom and liberty denied under ObamaCare which is established and guaranteed in the Constitution? The 111th Congress admits that they never read the 2700 pages of punishment, jail time, fines, Cadillac Tax, and death panels included for Americans only, not for them or those they exempted. The Democrats or Obama didn’t disclose the secret $17 trillion in additional taxation, but approved the unconstitutional laws by rubber stamping them approved. The 111th Democratic Rino Congress were Negligent and Failed to perform their fiduciary duty as lawmakers to the taxpayers and citizens and voters.
Ironically, this unjust, unfair, and inequitable new umbrella covering a myriad of mandates and requirements for Americans only are dictatorial restructured laws that reek of favoritism, nepotism, and collectivism, discrimination, which in my opinion, replaces freedom and liberty, the Right-to-Life, and replaces the U.S. Constitution. In fact, ObamaCare favors millions of his union supporters, Muslims, illegals, and refugees, who won’t be punished and won’t have to pay up front for American death panels, or mandated abortions, mandated vaccinations, mandated early end of life counseling. It appears that Obamacare is the depopulation of future Americans, ederly, sick, and veterans and mentally challenged. Obamacare includes includes the threat of punishment, i.e, jailand penalties for those who don’t comply or pay up front for services not rendered and may never be rendered also known as death panels which borders on tyranny and extortion. Americans will get nothing back for their money and no Consumer Quality Care or Consumer guarantees. The enslaved Americans will be forced to pick up the tab for all those who are new Middle East immigrants, refugees, illegals as well as prisoners and federal workers.
Obama Regime Punishes Americans with NDAA & Obamacare!
Are therestill three branches of government in existence within the United States or is it all theatrics? Since 2008, the majority of Americans have concern as they witness the unethical actions of Congress and the Judiciary who appear to have relinquished their powers and morphed into one branch of government known as the Executive Branch. If the congressional and judiciary branches of government fail in their fiduciary duty to exercise their powers and prevent the shredding of the U.S. Constitution then the Ruleof Checks and Balances is meaningless, as well. After all, they do seem to have stepped aside and granted the executive branch carte blanc rights to absolute power and allowed Obama to rule the nation without Congress by Executive Order.
We The People are quite aware that Article II has been rendered meaningless by the Justice Department, the Congress, and the Executive Branch. Well then, how is that happening in America? Justice Thomas stated at a hearing, the Justices intentionally “avoid” Article II! He also inferred that a person no longer has to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be president – not anymore – which left questions as to what Justice Thomas knew about the 2008 elections and Obama’s eligibility. The legal definitionof a U.S. Natural Born or U.S. Native born Citizen has been defined for 235 years until 2008 as written in the book titled, the “Law of Nations, and is the book which U.S. justices and congress define laws. The Law of Nations is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution and the Law of Nations is used by Law Professors for definition.
In other words, isn’t it true that a foreign-born baby, or a baby born toone foreign-born parent, even if one parent is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, is not eligible to be a U.S. Presidentbecause they do not meet the requirement of beinga U.S. Natural Born Citizen as required by Article II? Even foreign nations require the same unless there is a coup d’etat in the works. An American can’t go to the Middle East and apply to be the King of Saudi Arabia or the President of Iran. Obama may not be eligible to be the president of Africa because Obama inherited from his father, his birth right as Subject of Britain. An American can’t go to Great Britain and apply to be King of the UK. But, maybe Obama’s chances would be greater if he requested to be Knighted by the British Queen, than by the leaders of Africa, based on his being a Subject of Great Britain. After all, Obama has a complicated and complex background and he has claims of being white, Irish, Black, African, Kenyan, a British Subject, Muslim, Christian, U.S. Natural Born Citizen born in Hawaii, a prominent lawyer, law professor, community organizer, as well as an adopted son of Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro, where he lived and studied in Indonesia, as stated he is “one of them.” Barry Soetoro became an Indonesia Citizen upon adoption. Barry or Obama’s Kenyan grandma stated she was present when he was born in a Kenyan hospital.
There are documents relating to Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate posted by the Kenyan Parliament which were published in the Kenyan Parliamentary records as they were concerned about Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship at the time he was elected US President. The record stated that Obama was born in Kenya and the he is a Citizen of Kenya and a Subject of Great Britain, published back in 2008. The Parliament stated in the documents that they were surprised that America must not require that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be eligible to be an elected U.S. President.
On the other hand, babies born to foreigners on U.S. soil are referred to as inhabitants or foreigners and upon being legalized by immigration are known as naturalized citizens, but they can’t inherit the same birth rights of the U.S. natural-born and U.S. native-born children of the U.S. Natural or Native born fathers which are passed down from generation to generation making only the U.S. Natural Born Citizen eligible to become a U.S. President. Since 2008, Obama has stated a myriad of times on television and in writing that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., is a native-born Kenyan and a subject of Britain as well as an African and a Muslim. Even the Prime Minister of Kenya stated Obama was born in Kenya. After all, anyone with common sense realizes that it doesn’t make any sense and it’s definitely not logical or economically sound for any responsible citizen to spend $1,000,000 plus with the intent of concealing a $35 certified copy of a birth certificate from federal judges.
At the time of Obama’s alleged dad’s birth, Kenya was a British Colony, under the rule of the United Kingdom, where his Native born father, was born as a British subject governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 making his biological children, including Barack Hussein Obama, jr., subjects of Great Britain at birth by passing down his birthright to his son. The British Nationality Act of 1948 (part II, Section 5) states that subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after commencement of this act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of his birth. Again, Obama inherited his birthright from his foreign-born Kenyan-Muslim father and Subject of Great Britain. So it matters not where Obama was born – Kenya or Hawaii – except for truth – the fact is that he has a foreign-born father which renders him a Subject of Great Britain and making him ineligible by U.S. Constitutional law, Article II, which requires a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen even if he was born in Hawaii as he claims. It doesn’t even matter if his mother was a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. Even former Ca. Governor Schwarzenegger stated that he can’t be a U.S. President because his parents were born in Europe. Congressman Rubio stated he can’t run for U.S. President because one or both of his parents weren’t U.S. Natural Born Citizens. So, how is it that congress doesn’t recall the definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen as of 2008?
Indonesian Adoption: We The People also have read that his mother married Lolo Soetoro and lived in Indonesia with Obama jr. with the stepfather. Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama by marriage making Obama, a minor child, an Indonesian citizen, which allowed Obama to attend a madrassa, which he calls a Catholic school, but the teachers can’t teach Christianity or Catholicism on Muslim soil, but are required to teach Islamic studies in Indonesia. The intense memorization of the Koran in a Madrassa makes a big difference of what a child is taught in Muslim nations and where his deep rooted beliefs, religion, and ideologies are seeded. He also admits that his stepfather changed Obama’s name to Barry Soetoro. Research of Indonesian citizenship documentation reads that Indonesia didn’t recognize dual citizenship at the time Obama and his mom lived in Indonesia nor did the U.S. recognize dual citizenship, so upon Obama’s returning to the U.S. as an adult, he would be required to repatriate himself, but did he do that? And even if he did repatriate himself then why doesn’t he produce his immigration papers as a naturalized citizen based on the fact his dad is foreign-born? And, how is it that he allegedly received foreign student loans since one must be foreign-born to receive foreign student loans as questioned by constitutional lawyers?
The eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq, on or about 2008, was denied by Justice Roberts. I wrote aletter to Justice Roberts and each U.S. Justice in support of Berg’s eligibility lawsuit stating that if they didn’t hear Berg’s lawsuit and resolve eligibility as required by Article II that there could be a very bad case precedent set in 2012 which could cause anti-American foreigners, usurpers, and illegals to challenge Article II in the courts using Obama’s 2008 vetting case as a legal basis. How then without properly identifying a U.S. President or correcting the record legally for historical and public record are his Executive Orders considered constitutional and legal? Perhaps, the Congress and Justices do not want to admit their failure to vet a candidate properly, but the problem won’t disappear like a rabbit in a hat.
Genius is the word that should be used when referring to our Forefathers, for they understood that the day would come when federal public servants and Wall Street would fail in their fiduciary duty to their country and citizens. They knew that the day might come when federal lawmakers might attempt to avoid, re-write, ignore, manipulate, shred, and deny U.S.citizens freedom and liberty and even attempt to replace U.S. Constitutional Laws with a new set of restructured laws that deny every freedom and liberty under the guise of health care or under the guise of protecting citizens from terrorism. Freedom and Liberty has been established and guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and provides specific rights, i.e., due process of law, sovereignty, right to choose, and the right to life, with the intent of preventing tyranny.
Again, never forget the legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen which is required with the specific intent of preserving the Republic for future generations of U.S. Natural Born Citizens. Article II is required in order to prevent a foreigner from usurping office, whose passions lie elsewhere and whose intent could risk the safety of our nation. Article II is required to be followed by law because a U.S. President must“Love” his country and “love” the Natural Born Citizens; he must “desire” to preserve the laws, traditions, and culture passed down to biological children from their U.S. Natural Born Fathers, therefore preserve our nation’s culture.
Article II is the most important law of all! Our forefathers created Article II to preserve Western Culture for future generations, so a foreigner cannot usurp the laws and steal a nation or pilfer its wealth to be used for agendas other than to benefit the American people. Article II provides security that a U.S. Natural Born U.S. President inherits their birthright to become a candidate and be elected as a U.S. President, which is a birth right passed down through generations, from their natural-born fathers. Obama’s father didn’t have the U.S. natural-born birth right to pass down to Obama, therefore, he should step down and allow a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to exercise his or her birth right as a U.S. President. Have U.S. Natural Born Citizens been denied their birthright to be a U.S. Natural Born President?
Again, it’s important to understand that Article II doesn’t allow for compromise, but requires that a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born or Native born Citizen. The Forefathers intentionally inserted the Law of Nations into the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence so generations of Americans could always refer to the legal definition of constitutional law. An unvested man, who concealed his identity using Executive Orders with the intent to by-pass Article II after swearing an oath to uphold Article II, shouldn’t be allowed to remain a mystery from the people or supported by congress and the judiciary. If that is the case, then the congress and judiciary must take the responsibility if our nation is injured as their gross negligence and failure to uphold Article II , which is causing grave doubt and distrust, in the minds of the U.S. citizens, even around the world.
A majority of Americans fear that their nation could be changed and their lives jeopardized by the failure of public servants to perform their fiduciary duty according to their sworn oaths. Remember, Khrushchev said that a nation can be taken down without dropping one bomb, but most recently, the Russians have stated that the Americans are stupid for not vetting a U.S. President.
In fact, Eric Holder made a very disturbing statement at a college with a majority of Blacks in attendance when he stated, Americans will be polarized! Within 10-15 years, the face of America will be changed. He was called out on such a statement and made to apologize.
Article II requires a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be a U.S. President, so our democratic Republic can’t be overthrown by foreigners, period.
Never think lightly of the GENIUS of great men, our Forefathers, who understood tyranny, yet, they provided brilliant laws which allow Americans a guaranteed right and a duty to resist peacefully, or even exercise force in some cases, against oppressive laws if the citizens fear their government is threatening the safety of its citizens and their families, property, or country, clearly written into U.S. constitution and stated laws. Remember, under the Clinton administration, there were two attacks by our government against American citizens at WACO and at Ruby Ridge. American men, women, and children, were killed on U.S. soil versus upholding Article IV and exercising the rights of the citizens to access due process of law.
For example, in the 1970s, Chile was a democratic government with a democratic leader. Henry Kissinger mentors U.S. candidates and presidents such as Nixon, Ford, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Palin, and McCain. Kissinger and Nixon were behind the veil when Chile’s government was overthrown and the lives of the Chilean citizens changed over night. The citizens of Chile were shocked when the coup d’etatbegan bombing their city and firing upon innocent citizens. The citizens were taken over by tyrannical militants and they lost their freedom and liberty over night. Free enterprise was devastated as military tanks rolled in rendering all innocent citizens helpless. The frightened and abused citizens were beaten, rounded up and jailed, tortured, killed, separated from their loved ones, and forced to pay extremely high taxes as a tyrant named Pinochet was ushered in to rule the people with an iron fist After he established his tyrannical government, he released the remaining citizens from prison. Those who opposed the government’s agendas were arrested and indefinitely detained or executed. How then do we allow a public servant/s to devalue the worth of human life if the congress places no value upon the lives of its own citizens and views people as “non-persons” or enemies of the state? In fact, millions of future citizens of a nation can be wiped out by government mandated abortions! In fact, the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, addresses abortions and can be reviewed on-line at amazon or by clicking on http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Thus, it is important to wonder why Congress and law enforcement have skipped over the fact that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro attempted to insert an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill in 2008 prior to elections, an amendment that would eliminate the words, U.S. NaturalBorn Citizen, from Article II, since Bill Clinton had inferred that Obama is not a citizen, as well as, McCain, during the presidential campaign of 2008? Such a move would have let Obama off the hook from being prosecuted for Treason and a foreign enemy as far as eligibility goes or the Kenyan government believing Americansdidn’t care about Article II’s requirements back in 2008.
Why would Senator Hillary Clinton, running for the same office in the same election, even want to help Obama, her competitor when she worked so hard to be the First Female President of the USA, secretly assist Obama in attempting to remove the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from Article II of the U.S. Constitution before the 2008 elections?
Why would there be allegations that Senator Pelosi altered the wording before signing the Certification involving Obama’s vetting records?
Why would Obama’s Kenyan Grandmother and the Kenyan Prime Minister and recently, his brother Malik post Obama’s Kenyan Birth Certificate and call Obama, a “fraud, dishonest, and a con.” Obama’s Bio was published in a magazine stating he was born in Kenya and he stated he wasn’t born in America in a speech that was taped on video. The on-line U.S. Birth Certificates posted by Obama and/or the White House as well as the Kenyan newspapers, and according to forensics, experts, and law enforcers is a forgery.
In conclusion, based upon the knowledge admitted by Obama that his biological Kenyan father born as a subject of Britain, Barack Hussein Obama sr – and only his mom being a U.S. natural-born citizen – baffles the average mind of how congress and the judiciary, MSM, and the entire federal government duped the American people. The Democrats and Rinos and MSM continue to justify that Obama aka Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian National, qualified to be elected as a U.S. President in 2008, and 2012 as required by Article II and as defined by “The Law of Nations,” and US laws. Isn’t that infiltration into the U.S. government by consent? The U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Congress have this information at their finger tips and they ignored it and dismissed the lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg prior to the inauguration of 2009. Shouldn’t the admitted fact from Obama’s own writings and words sharing that Obama’s Kenyan and generational Muslim father is a foreign-born Kenyan and a British subject making Obama a British subject at birth in 1961 by Birthright be considered more than enough reason to hold court hearings?
Why did Obama insert an amendment into an exiting Presidential Directive with the intent of concealing his credentials and identity from Americans which he immediately enacted after swearing an oath to uphold Article II. His self-serving and self-protection amendment provides precise instructions which state that only by his consent or the advice of Eric Holder can his identity be released for public scrutiny, even to congress, or law enforcement prohibiting true identification should congress or law enforcement choose to conduct hearings relating to his eligibility and prove or disprove the challenge as to whether or not Obama aka Barry met the eligibility requirements of Article II established by the U.S. Constitution. And, that’s why the Kenyan citizens interviewed on tape and the Kenyan Parliament and his Kenyan Parliament and the Kenyan leaders such as Gadaffi who called Obama, “my son” or “our son” couldn’t believe as they stated that the American people elected a Kenyan for U.S. President.
Obviously, it is important that the American people remember they are the government, and this federal regime has trampled on “limited government” – trampled on the laws of the land. Americans have constitutional laws allowing them to exercise and resist peacefully against unconstitutional or rigged elections, illegal donations from foreign sources; improper vetting procedures; and unconstitutional laws by petitioning, emailing, calling, writing, changing laws, researching, and filing Grievances with the U.S. Congress. Shouldn’t congress suspend Obama’s job as president and his Executive Orders until they complete an investigative hearing and determine his eligibility? It’s only when the congress exercises their authority to certify the truth on public record that U.S. Natural Born Americans will feel vindicated from being called names, such as “birthers” for attempting to preserve the nation’s Western laws and culture for future and current generations of U.S. Natural Born kids, grandkids, and future generations.
If it is wrong to request that Congress uphold Article II then how is it right for them to remain as lawmakers, for if that is the case, should they refuse to uphold constitutional law and perform their fiduciary duty – have they now become law breakers? Do they not desire to preserve the U.S. Constitution as well as the Republic, Western culture, Judeo-Christian roots and traditions, the economy; the preservation of freedom and liberty, the preservation of due process of law, the preservation of the right to life, so future U.S. Natural Born Citizens can inherit the same birthrights for which they are entitled, not foreigners who immigrate into the U.S., but U.S. Natural Born citizens able to fulfill their duty if they choose to become a U.S. Natural Born President? But if that Birthright is stolen by a usurper aka a foreign immigrant than the U.S. Natural Born Citizen is denied their inheritance of their U.S. Natural Born birth right and their legal right – should they so choose – to become a U.S. Natural Born President of the United States of America – a most honorable position to embrace and cherish.
Congress ignores “limited Powers” and tramples on the Constitution!
It’s a mystery as to why the 111th and 112th Congress and the U.S. Justices would fail to uphold Article II, but it is the most important law established by our Forefathers as well as Article IV which provides to every individual their right to exercise due process of law. There’s a statement I wrote in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, “Without due process of law, there is nothing. Nothing but tyranny.”
On or about 2001 and 2008,and most recently, Obama stated that his goal was to “disarm” Americans on Meet the Press about 2008. (He launched Fast & Furious in 2009 with $10,000,000 of stimulus money promised for jobs). Obama stated in 2001 and 2008 and in 2011 that congress and the constitution are “meaningless.” About 2001 and 2008, he stated that at the “Constitution is nothing more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] which need to be changed,” which may have been scrubbed on the internet. The statements of his father being foreign-born and the myriad of other allegations should be enough for congress to suspend Obama’s presidency until the congress, and senate can sort out the truth based upon constitutional law. It would appear that whenever questions arise relating to eligibility of a public servant’s qualification, then the laws he has implemented shouldn’t be rubber stamped and enforced, until the truth is certified and made public. It is time to Ring the liberty Bell</strong>! In fact, it’s the fiduciary duty of the U.S. Congress, Senate, and Justices to uphold their sworn oaths and uphold the constitution, including Article II. U.S. federal public servants should represent the will of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and U.S. Native Born Americans in exchange for their jobs and wages. The failure of these public servants to acknowledge the Grievances of the American people shall only cause their cries to ring out louder until the winds stop blowing in an ugly direction. ***(This article may be shared but not Plagiarised by a Third Party – all (C) rights reserved by the writer, Rose Colombo)
Rose Colombo has proposed laws as the Founder, Women Fight Back, a grassroots movement she formed in 1989 that spread in the news like wildfire. She proposed laws, which were implemented, related to Family Law and Joint Custody. As an invited speaker, shes addressed the Ca. Senate, Justice Department, Criminal Planning providing recommendation related to Family Law as an Advocate, Invited Guest of the Granada Forum, L.A. Press Speaker’s Bureau (standing ovation); Created and Hosted: The Pro-Justice Summit. She’s been a public speaker at local Chambers of Commerce, Pre-Paid Legal Services, and community groups. She’s received a myriad of media awards for her writings on injustices including a local newspaper column she created and wrote for two years, “One-Woman’s Opinion.”
Rose Colombo author of 2 Award-Winning and 5 Star Review Books: “Fight BackLegal Abuse,”and “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks, and Radicals” a political satire and orwellian adventure story about Obamasaurus for any age. Read Complimentary pages at – http://www.amazon.com
Follow Rose on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and Social Media – Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be legal, political, financial, or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. visit my website for bio, book, photo, videos, awards – www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Rose Colombo, author, Political Activist &, Legal Consultant for Justice
by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder
Did Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?
In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about March 2012. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly. Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?
Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants; but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future. Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?
Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law. For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter? The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive. So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty? Also, the attacks on Libya, in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.
Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies? Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority? Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?
Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution. He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States
Rep. Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree. Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal basis.” He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”
Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act. He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.
Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.” He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you. If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.
Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.” Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis. Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here. We want to build an international support.
Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat. Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by Panetta’s statements.
Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.
So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress? Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution. It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.
In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?
The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitutionand Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175). It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it. They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere. For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion. I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another. I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.” In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.
Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers? How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends. How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place? At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.
Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation. How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution? For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder, without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price. If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?
Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or 2 men the right to knight themselves with absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen? Obama called the attack on Libya, a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?
In conclusion, if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country. If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern, it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.
Furthermore, if the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion? America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?
How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA? By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial? Even a guilty person should be given a trial! In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now. The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds. The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only. By the way, how is that even legal in America? It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws. Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages! Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Click the like button and leave a comment, please. You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit Disclaimer: Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Obama declared America to be a “battlefield,” not a Christian nation of peace!
written by Rose Colombo – original (c) pub. 12/28/2011, rev. 12/13/2013
Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution. It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.
Recently on CNN, the Intel Chairs, including Senator Feinstein, stated that America is less safe today than we were before 2009 or after 911. How is it that America is vulnerable to attack in 2013 when they had the opportunity to refuse to pay Iran $7B of US taxpayer money every year with knowledge that they are building possible nuclear weapons and that their former leader, Ahmadinejad and many other Muslim Brotherhood members or groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would wipe Western Civilization – America and Israel – off the face of the map?
The most alarming statement ever made during my life time, which should have rocked the nation, came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein, who said congress and the non-vetted President Obama implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows: “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.
How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government to be targeted anywhere around the world if “accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all “due process of law?” Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, “The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.” Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing words included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senators Graham and John McCain stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution?
Remember, Judge Napolitano stated, NDAA “shreds” the U.S. Constitution even though Obama and Congress swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen, not charge a citizen. Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military? So, has the 111th and 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without “due process of law,” there is no justice! There is only the possibility for tyranny and death or enslavement. The political satire recently released on amazon.com, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, alerts mankind to the dangers of Obamacare and the Redistribution of America’s wealth with fictional characters that parallel today’s Orwellian state of affairs.
Hear ye! Hear ye! All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story, along the lines of War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members – elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars, who voters and taxpayers believed as having the highest level of integrity and loyalty to the United States of America. America is a Republic and has been established as a Republic implemented by the Rule of Law, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, so let’s pray that the NDAA Law ends up to be no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible lack of communication, right? Unfortunately, it is real! I have posted videos online with a special guest and Patriot, Anthony J. Hilder,, who warned Americans back in the late 1990s, that there were people, who intended to imprison more Americans, especially Blacks, eventually use them for racial tension then as slaves in the prisons, but then again – it appears that any American can be a potential target today, since the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, Kill List using drones or whatever, and the foreign invasion of a majority of radical males, as well as the implementation of Obamacare that denies health care in most cases and mandates taxpayer funded abortions, death panels, mandated vaccines, micro-chips, and basically, death to Americans. And there is the Executive Order signed by President Bush in 2005 and Obama under his reign that wipes out the Constitution, Sovereignty, USA, and allows for the indefinite detention of all Americans should a President call out Civil Unrest or a Pandemic and Martial Law on U.S. soil which is totally unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, and outside of their job duties for which they are elected and taxpayer funded. It’s calle treason.
The NDAA law includes sections 1031 and 1032 and brings back memories of Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America” and failed to address himself as the President of the United States of America. Why would he do that? It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’ seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles. Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor by wiping out the Middle Class and creating a nation of the wealthy citizens and a nation of poor citizens. And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the “homeland” to be nothing more than a “battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as “enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” only and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law.” Or should we ask if the Obama regime are granting to themselves the authority to kidnap Americans on domestic or foreign soil without due process of law and without public scrutiny so that the persons kidnapped under the NDAA law would have no contact with the outside world? The usurping of the 4th Amendment, due process of law, by writing a new law to unconstitutionally by-pass due process of law, eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.
The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads: “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens. It does.”
Oh, no, it can’t can’t be possible for U.S. Congressional members to deny due process of law knowing it’s unconstitutional, right? We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right? Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and either laid down their lives or would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments, for which our U.S. laws are rooted, and the word of God expressed in the Bible, as well as the definition of our laws defined in the book, the “Law of Nations.”
Yes, it is true! Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA as stated by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.) on national television. The NDAA’s, sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter – did not include Americans – but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law. It’s alleged to have been passed without the congressional members knowing the law included Americans, but pressured by the non-vetted President Obama to include Americans, a very disturbing thought, indeed. Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein, McCain, Levin, and Graham as well as the mostly democratic congressional representatives, as well as Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 – and did not strike those unconstitutional sections – from the law titled NDAA-S.1867. The NDAA law, shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment, based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.”
Now is the time to demand to answers as to how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every citizen, legal or illegal, on U.S. soil as some people allege our government is under some sort of threat and are working allegedly under some sort of fear written by alternative writers. So, hasn’t the president and the Congress violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? How is it that Senator Graham and Senator McCain as ell as other representatives declaring that the “world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war? Thus, they would have to declare war against the country they swore to protect! Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that “people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?” Also, how is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” – an ugly law titled, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of Sections 1031 and 1032). This should be worrisome to Americans considering the majority of Americans want a new “vetted” president, as they are watching the race card being played out, knowing that such actions could cause civil unrest.
Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”
As I state in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” that “without “Due Process of Law, Article, IV, there is nothing! There is nothing but tyranny!” Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people who are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law. It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”
Americans must write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, refuse to reveal the “charges.” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial,” and deny American citizens access to a civilian court guaranteed to U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law, while providing due process of law to captured Middle East foreign radicals of 911 and other attempted plots against America.
Again, Senator Feinstein stated that sections 1031 and 1032 are included targeting Americans for indefinite detention saying, “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard. So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief? But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power.
Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a U.S. soldier of a crime. Although, there are journalists stating that this law, Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today. In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases. Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, “So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.” He said, “Yes, they are still in effect.”
Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, “Don’t be
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.”
So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?” Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?
Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?” One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world. The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare. During WWII, the Nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being “extremists.” So, sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.
In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’ including the homeland.” How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” as Sections 1031 and 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government, who can be detained indefinitely, as “enemy combatants” and denied “due process of law?” It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from the NDAA Law and Sections 1031 and 1032 which they have dished out for the American people. After all, they shoved the unread Obamacare down the throats of Americans, who objected, while taking bribes for votes and making backroom deals, but didn’t feel it was good enough for Congress, so they exempted themselves holding themselves above the laws of the land they mandated. They wrote loopholes into the laws making “Insider Trading” legal for congressional members, but illegal for American citizens, who they send to jail and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal.
On the other hand, how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for law makers? It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office exempt themselves and hold themselves above the laws they mandate \and dish out for the American people.
On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then one must ponder who is America battling on a daily basis? It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!” Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who the U.S. federal government is battling or at war with if not Islam who attacked Americans on 911 and murdered Americans and continue to threaten Americans? In fact, there are radicals from Mexico and from the Middle East, who gained citizenship and swore to pledge allegiance to the U.S and the U.S. flag stand on U.S. soil and state that they will eliminate Western Civilization, democracy, and dominate America which is prohibited by U.S. Constitutional law, but Americans have been arrested for praying on public sidewalks including heterosexuals who are dancing or kissing in public. since 2009.
Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.” Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground. Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. I guess politicians can spin the laws in any direction that suits them, but not so for the American citizens. The NATO mission against Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the assassination of Gaddafi. The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried. It’s “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrannical leaders of Communist and Third World national. In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].”
Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of al-awalki, an converto to radical Islam, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.” But, he was denied “due process of law” and to the best of my knowledge, never charged with a crimes before he was taken out under Obama’s regime. Think about that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of any and all Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?” Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of lawand render Americans live on U.S. soil today without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant? One must ponder if a Tea Party member, or an Oathkeeper, or a Christian, Catholic, heterosexual, a Patriot, pro-Constitutional American, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-God, pro-right-to-life, and pro-Free Enterprise be targeted?
For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.”
Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally released after he was denied “due process of law” on U.S. soil as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.
David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and he could have been served with a subpoena orarrested, but instead American women, children, and men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration, except for the people who escaped. What crimes did the women and children and unborn babies commit, but even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil and a government becomes similar to a “mob rule.”
Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. The respected Constitutional Lawyer, Gerry Spence, stepped up to the plate in his defense.
Therefore, Americans must ask, “What happened to the Udall Bill that was proposed and would shred Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law?”
Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes. Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right? In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.
How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a “water boarding ” policy after 911. Should we not as – which is worse? Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and denying “due process of law that indefinitely detains any citizen – innocent or guilty – on U.S. soil? – or an implementing a “hit” list of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world based on an accusation only?
On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.” And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.” Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.
Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war on Libya? And, which nation is the “homeland” battling? We should ask under which authority is congress applying that provides congressional members the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny “due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032? ***(Thisarticle may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, an Irwin Award winning writer,poet, and author whose been published around the world as a 5 Star Review. Colombo’s first shocking self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” published late 2010 on amazon reveals the truth about the illusion of justice and how easily anyone can be targeted by the government and their lives destroyed. The second book, a fictional political Orwellian satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” exposes the U.N.’ redistribution of health and wealth and begs the question if the dinosaurs were depopulated or made extinct.
Rose Colombo has been featured in “The Journal of Commerce and Science” worldwide magazine; The Veterans Reporter; The Daily Law Journal published for lawyers and judges; Orange County Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post, L.A. Times, Seal Beach Journal, and more….interviewed on major and local radio and TV and produced and hosted her own created cable TV and am-FM and online radio shows with prominent guests. She is currently on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice, and social media.
“Legal Gangsters??” (c) a title coined in 1991 by Rose Colombo – Rose permitted the use of her title for a newspaper article as a co-author published April 9, 1996 – She wrote this latest original article pub. (c) 11/20/2011 as follows:
Legal Abuse is not new! After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress. The new definition of illegal is titled “inversion!” What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress! This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society. They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases; a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws. Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent. These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal job descriptions. They fly in the face of America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form. Every federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty. A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law. A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order. Executive Orders are not laws.
Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down. How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own? In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms. The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey.
As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse. Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.
Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s. One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.” A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs. So, what was the remedy? Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the “machine” in operation.
For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.” Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.” Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.” The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law. They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines.
Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!
An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright, who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:
“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.” He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved. He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else. Crime is crime.”
“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office. He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance. You are relieved of your responsibilities here. Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’ Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.” He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.” He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”
Wright asked, “What are the charges?” The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.” And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”
Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage. Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand. I had no choice at all. Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”
(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”). On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.” ** (This articlemay be shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party.)
Rose Colombo’s self-help Irwin Award Winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, and her latest political satire paralleling todays unconstitutional health care law, Obamacare, with fictional characters that reveal the Orwellian changes coming to America offer Free Reviews and Complimentary Pages at www.amazon.com
Irwin Award Winner self-help: Fight Back Legal Abuse
written by Rose Colombo, original l(c) pub. 11/16/2011
Occupy Wall Street made a statement whether people agree or not, at least they protested the long arm reaching from the White House into Wall Street and Wall Street reaching into the White House. In fact, the majority of citizens don’t believe they have the power to change the winds that have been shifting in an ugly direction as the federal government is trampling on the constitution and the “limited power” that is established by constitutional law. Americans need to unite against the double standards that have been secretly implemented by past and current congressional members who are filling their bank accounts on the taxpayer’s time and dime!
How many Americans have looked up the definition of “Insider Trading?” Are you aware that insider trading is illegal and that the Department of Justice went after “Martha” who made a pittance on her investment in comparison to former Speaker Pelosi, so how is that?
Insider Trading is: “The use of material, non-public information in trading the shares of a company by a corporate insider or other person who owes a “fiduciary duty” to the company.” How is it that the U.S. Congress no longer believes that they have a “fiduciary duty” to the American people as well as to the corporations who are seeking the approval or denial of bills before the U.S. Congress?
Furthermore, “This is the classic definition. The Supreme Court has also approved a broader definition known as the “misappropriation theory;” the deceitful acquisition and misuse of information that property belongs to persons to whom one owes a duty.”
Obviously, members of congress are provided confidential information which could enhance their financial wealth outside of their job description if they choose to abuse their power on taxpayer’s time and work on personal “insider trading” on the job. Americans don’t pay public servants to work on their personal Wall Street portfolios, but pay them to protect the public from unethical laws. Federal employees are paid by the taxpayers to review corporate laws for approval or denial and determine if it is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congress as they withhold or deny or approve corporate laws presented to them for a vote based on insider trade secrets. How is it not considered a Conflict of Interest or misappropriation as well as deceitful and unethical for congressional members to work on personal “insider trade” secrets for personal financial gain while working as federal employees working on the clock and paid with taxpayer dollars? If congressional members feel it is ethical to use confidential information seeking insider trade secrets on the job than they should clock out!
On its face, it would appear that the Judicial Ethics Committee would be reviewing the Conflict of Interest, as well as the “misappropriation theory” and “deceitful acquisition or “misuse” of information which was intended for the purposes of ensuring the people were protected from big corporations on Wall Street. So, this would explain why the American people are concerned about the U.S. Congress and Executive Office climbing in bed with Wall Street as the people line the streets protesting the double standards.
Last week, the senate voted to deny the American people the right to exercise freedom of speech on the internet by passing a bill titled “Net Neutrality.” It is my suggestion that the American people and media wake up, because “Net Neutrality” circumvents the First Amendment and could devastate careers and corporations who promote themselves on the internet. This is a very dangerous attack against Freedom of Speech by the Obama administration. Such a law could target people who protest against corruption between the White House and Wall Street.
Fortunately, CBS exposed a third big scandal related to the Obama administration and Congress. The U.S. Congress, past and current, passed laws stating that “insider trading” is illegal, but with deceit and non-disclosure, Congress created a double standard for congressional members making “insider trading” for congressional members legal. Congress has written laws that circumvent the laws established for the American people by writing self-serving laws which exempt themselves from complying with the established laws mandated for all citizens and self-protecting laws which prohibit them from being prosecuted for “insider trading.” In other words, what they implemented as “illegal” insider trading for all other citizens is “legal” for congress.
How is it legal and ethical for congressional members to re-write laws which circumvent the laws of the land, while simultaneously abusing their positions of power to write laws that allow them to violate the law with immunity, while on the job and racking up wages paid by the U.S. taxpayers? The American people were led to believe that they voted for congressional representatives who would review corporate documents and determine what is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congressional members on taxpayer’s dime!
Under which congressional authority and fiduciary duty or job description is it that allows congress to circumvent the constitution by writing self-serving laws that protect them from complying with laws and from punishment, so they can fill their bank accounts, by creating double standards which favor congress?
So, how does congress justify their “insider trading” on the job for their personal financial gain when they are paid to protect the people from criminals who are arrested for insider trading?” For example, a bank clerk wouldn’t be allowed to study the customer’s portfolios and discuss insider trade secrets on the job without being fired, yet there are congressional members using their time on the job paid by taxpayers for personal financial gain.
Which constitutional law or fiduciary job description did Rep. Pelosi apply that justifies her using confidential information which is the property of the government as personal information which in my opinion is unethical with the intent of using the “insider trading” secrets for her personal financial gain? How is it okay for any employee to use information that belongs to the government or to a corporation for personal use? In the private sector, employees would be fired.
Is it ethical for congress and the executive office to write self-serving, self-regulatory, and self-protecting laws for self-gain that provides them exemptions from compliance and exemption from punishment after mandating that all other citizens must comply with the laws which they mandate or else be punished such as “insider trading” and “Obama care?”
Which constitutional amendment or the federal job description provides congress the authority to write approve, and enforce “insider trading” as illegal for the American people, but “legal for congressional members?
Consequently, I have determined that some congressional members believe that they have the authority to abuse their positions of power, even if it involves ethics violations and conflicts of interest to provide themselves immunity when they use “insider trading” secrets for financial gain by deeming “insider trading” as “illegal” for the citizens, but “legal” for congressional members who commit the same white-collar crime without fear of being punished.
In conclusion, as long as the American people remain passive and accept that lawmakers can become law breakers by re-writing laws, manipulating the law, changing laws that are self-protecting from compliance and prosecution, the American people will be faced with double standards, unconstitutional laws, and a constitution that their leaders believe the words of Obama when he stated in 2001 and 2008 that the constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] that is “meaningless.” **( This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, is the producer and host of former cable TV and talk radio show, “Issues of the Day.” She’s been seen and or heard on radio and TV and red in major and local newspapers. Read Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her 2 books, Irwin Award Winner, self-help book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire depicting fictional characters with an Orwellian story paralleling today’s corrupted political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,” at www.amazon.com
written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/19/2011
We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009. Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members between 2009 – 2011. The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.
Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit” list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government? It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens. If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law? A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!
Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008: “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies. It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members. There are hundreds of missing guns!
Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.” Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money. The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.
How is it that the Obama czars, the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Homeland Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?
We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley. We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation. More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.
Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.
The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:
1. 1992: Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.
2. 2000: Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits. She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign. She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.
3. March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.
4. March 25, 2004: SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)
5. July 29, 2005: S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing
6. September 2005: Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune
7. 2006: Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]
8. 2008: New York Times: “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].
9. October 20, 2008: Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
10. March 13, 2009: Gun Ban List: HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.
11. L.A. Times 3/27/2009: “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”
Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”
“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”
12. March 2009: Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A. Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%]. They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.
13. March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.
14. May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.
15. August 14, 2009: CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1: “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”
16. August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2: Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.
17. June 28, 2010: The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”
18. July 20, 2010: The Examiner by Howard Portney read: “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”
Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest; or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?
19. May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.
20. June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’ Clinton said in an interview. “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
21. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.
22. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.
23. August 2010: Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights: She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.
24. August 2010: Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders: Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts. She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.
25. September 2, 2010: Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics. [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]
26. January 8, 2011: Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents. Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.
27. Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury. He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.
28. January 8, 2011: LiteNews.com – U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life. Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush. He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner. Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency. The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll. Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.
29. February 23, 2011 Letter: Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”
30. February 2011 Letter posted on-line: Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico. “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”
31. June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein: “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations. This administration routinely ignores subpoenas. The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.” [2009].
32. May 23, 2011: CNN seen on You Tube video: Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks. [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)
33. 2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.
On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America. On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body. On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki. Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?” These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.
In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date, as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens. The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future. **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).
The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review. Read Reviews andcomplimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
Rose Colombo, award-winning author and fmr AM-FM radio host and producer and host of former cable TV show states, “America is in a supernatural battle of good vs. evil in these volatile times. The pendulum on the Scales of Justice is swinging far left both politically and socially. America shall either maintain freedom or see radical ‘change.'” I am reposting an important speech delivered by Geert Wilders, which I received and saved on about 2009. At the time, I was warned that it was too dangerous to share, but I felt it was important to saving our nation from possible danger and a high jacking of the USA! So, I not only published it in 2009, but I saved it for people who would like to read it for the first time. May God Protect America from anti-American enemies.Mr. Wilders wrote this letter under great threat by the European leaders, especially in Holland after terrorists attacked the Journalists.
Very scary……think 9/11…….think recent attempted destruction of one of our airliners…be aware………..
Snopes authenticates the delivery of the speech…………….
Geert Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament. America as the last man standing ‘In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?’
Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.
Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.
First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close, I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.
The Europe you know is changing.
You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.
All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe . With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.
In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.
Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.
In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.
In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.
Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanyahu, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.
A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.
The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .
Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the basileus. I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.
Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.
Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.
This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel , they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamic [indoctrination] as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.
Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.”
GEERT WILDERS
We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic strategic goal as written and stated to destroy the free world without dropping a nuke, but through illegal migration.. Please take the time to read and understand what is written here, Please send it to every free person that you know, it is so very important. [The Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR is not a friend of Western Civilization. The written and stated strategic goal of the Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR organization is to invade, infiltrate, overpopulate and dominate. They intend as written and stated to infiltrate government on all levels, schools, universities, and churches. Their stated weapon is to overpopulate and dominate each city, county, then state like in Minnesota. The Muslim Brotherhood strategic written and stated goals in published in the Muslim Brotherhood book entitled, “The Project.” They use their radicalized females it appears to stir up hate for the President of the USA and the White House as witnessed in their speeches. They use females to lead American women’s marches and encourage the America’s young females to abort their natural-born babies needed to preserve America. The Left under Obama imposed same-sex indoctrination and transgender lifestyles under the guise of education which are depopulation programs of future natural-born Americans.
In fact, I warned the Democrat Congress and Senate including my own reps by writing the First Blog in the nation prior to their vote on Obamacare entitled,”Obamacare is unconstitutional and illegal” and warned of death panels for Americans by euthanizing Americans chronically ill or elderly and paying for a consumer product with our own earned money after taxes that we may or may not want to buy that would be rationed or denied to Americans which are death panels and depopulation for Americans only because Obama and Congress exempted themselves, donors, and illegals and Muslims.
After Obama was slipped into office in 2009 with the blessings of Holder and the Clinton’s, McCain,Soros, Bush’s, the Democrats cared less that Obama couldn’t provide a vetted Certified U.S. Birth Certificate which is required to be a U.S. President or a U.S. Senator, but it apparently, it was all about the money – stimulus money – funneling tax dollars – and making deals with foreign nations and even foreign enemy nations. Much of the stimulus money went to radiate Americans which is a death panel as well as to donors such as Mr.Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, billionaire George Soros, IMF, Muslim Brotherhood leaders such as Morsi and Odinga and Planned Parenthood and the migrations of radicals and illegals into the USA.
Obama and Holder concealed Obama’s true identification, Military Registration if any, Repatriation papers if any, Indonesian Citizenship, Kenyan Birth Certificate, and foreign student body card and loan, Law License, and all Credentials from the American citizens. Obama and Holder inserted instructions into President Bush’s existing Presidential Order making it impossible for anyone to review anything without the permission of Obama and Holder.
After Justice John Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq., prior to the inauguration in January 2009, his decision appears to me to be extremely careless, but I guess he thought, “What difference at this point, does it make?
I wrote to Justice Roberts and each Justice in support of attorney Berg’s eligibility lawsuit based on We The People’s and stated that We are the Government and have “Standing” because we pay the wages of the POTUS and all public servants. We The People are entitled to vet the candidates in exchange for votes and taxpayer funded wages with benefits. I explained in my letter that if Justice Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit that he could be setting a very bad precedent in the future that could lead to foreign spies, illegals, enemies of the USA, and cartels or terrorists accessing the highest office in the land. I was correct.
Apparently, Justice Roberts didn’t care because he denied the eligibility lawsuit. And, today, California’s Governors Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s nephew, opened the borders to illegals and jihadist, cartels and gangs, by denying ICE and Border Patrol the right to inspect the illegals entering into California who bypassed legal Ports of Entry. Brown and Newsom and their Democrat administration are not being removed by the DOJ for aiding and abetting, harboring, and materially assisting illegals inside the USA but rewarding the illegals and fake or real Refugees/asylum seekers with U.S. American tax dollars earned by hard-working legal Americans who pay their wages to uphold the law, not violate the law. Illegal means Illegal and that word is defined to describe a criminal in the U.S. Law books – all of the U.S. Law Books! This appears to me that the Democrats may have pledged their allegiance to secret international entities or persons or societies.
Govs. Brown Family and the Pelosi Family have ruined California while they’ve made themselves wealthy living off taxpayers. Speaker Nancy Pelosi engaged in Insider Trading with windfalls in the millions and called it legal while Martha Stewart went to jail. She was creating her wealthy Family Dynasty! In fact, the same people have been running the Democrat Congress and California for 20-40 years or more….running it into the ground from the most wealthy Golden State in the union to the most impoverished state that turned the Golden Gate City of San Francisco into a ghetto.
Governors Brown and Newsom care less about legal Americans, they only care about turning California into a foreign nation so did Hillary Clinton give California away to China or Mexico? It’s been reported that many illegals and refugees stated they came to the USA because they were promised freebies paid by the taxpayers. They promised the illegals and fake or real asylum seekers that the Americans would pick up their lifetime tab for Obamacare, living expenses, Drivers Licenses, and even allow illegals to run for public office! Fortunately, Brown is gone and Newsom is facing 2,000,000 signatures demanding he be Recalled as Governor of California. It can’t be soon enough.
Obama was quick in 2009 right after the inauguration to inform 330,000,000 Americans that “America is no longer a Christian nation.” He said that America would be changed and “transformed” in the next 5 days. He stated that the U.S. Constitution was”meaningless” and Congress was “meaningless” and he would use his Blackberry and pen to sign E.O.’s into law bypassing the congressional legislatures who are elected to write the laws, not Obama.
I will never forget the Obama speech in CAIRO when Obama aka Barry Soetoro shocked everyone and spoke to the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in perfect Arabic and stated that he knows….because he is “one of them. On that day, he promised the Muslims two states. I still recall thinking if he was promising them Europe and America.
Furthermore, not long after that CAIRO speech, he flew off to Germany and didn’t address America or Americans, he said, “People of the World.” Apparently, he believed he was the One World Leader rising up. He also immediately flew to Canada and Mexico to speak to the Presidents in those 2 countries where the preplanned secret radicals would be entering to come into the USA it appears.
Obama and Hillary Clinton’s secret pre planned migration of Somalians and Palestinians linked to the MB-CAIR-Hamas-Hezbollah organizations were flown into the USA late at night by their orders and taxpayer funded DHS buses were being used to scatter them around the country. Obama and Hillary Clinton diverted U.S. Tax Dollars (stimulus) and used U.S. Refugee Centers to push through as many radicals as possible each day for 8 years before the funding ran out. The whistleblowers stated they did little or no vetting.
It appears the radicals were promised free everything even if they were polygamist, healthy and able to work, with several wives and dozens of kids. Polygamy and Bigamy and Incest are serious crimes int he USA, but the Democrats cared less that this is a violation of U.S. Laws. Obama and the Democrats didn’t care because they were working overtime to change and transform for USA into a foreign nation of illegals and radicals. Obama repeatedly met in secret many times with the Muslim Brotherhood leaders for 8 years in the White House. He promised the radicals from foreign enemy nations that they would receive free housing, health care, SNAP Food credit, education and he approved a Hate Crimes Bill that discriminates against Americans, Christians, Jews, and patriots who are accused of offending the foreigners. This is a discriminatory bill and should be voided now!
Obama allowed the radicals to set up what is called no-go zones on American soil – our Homeland. The Democrats and RINOS cared less about anything Obama and Holder and Hillary and their Democrat regime didn’t care what they weren’t doing for America, but what they were doing to America, and for themselves. We are no different than Europe during WWII. We are no different than Europeans currently watching Macron and Merkel, Belgium and Sweden, New Zealand selling out their natural-born citizens and Homeland to radicals from across the oceans. I
If Americans don’t wake up to the truth and protect and stand with President Donald J.Trump and unite as loyal Natural Born or loyal generational naturalized Americans and demand our borders are secured and that Detain and Deport is Restored they win. We must Demand that the Republic is restored and operated by the established constitutional laws that protect the borders and legal Americans who own their Homeland and are required by law to defend it from foreign and domestic enemies.
Donations Appreciated
Rose4justice Blogs N Radio Shows 