Rose4Justice.com – Rose Colombo, author of award-winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, 5 Star Review – advocate and activist for Justice for nearly 30 years whose proposed laws implemented in California and nationally.
Are Long-Time Key Leaders and Loyal Supports in Public Office Holding Themselves Above the Law as They Support Illegal Aliens, Not Legal Americansand Did they Breach their Sworn Oath and Fiduciary Duty and/or Mislead Americans and Constituents That They would Uphold Legal Immigration, Legal Identification, Legal Inspections, and Legal Citizenship? Doesn’t a Breach for public service jobs who are believed by the voters that they will uphold their fiduciary duty that includes upholding the laws of the land when they make verbal promised and recite ar Sworn Oath or sign which is a is believed to be a contract in Good Faith in exchange for votes, political jobs and taxpayer funded wages and benefits and lifetime pensions,but fail to keep those verbal promises after elected to office?
It appears when the Speaker of the House, Democrats, and Rinos violate their Sworn Oath with intent to “aid and abet” and “harbor” illegal aliens from foreign enemy nations, Socialist, Communist, Terrorist, or friendly nations who illegally violate the Sovereignty and Legal Immigration Laws of the USA are defined in the law books as criminals according to the United States Law Books and the U.S. Constitution! If they aren’t criminals then defund and get rid of all Border Patrol and ICE now turned into day care centers, babysitters, and health care staff. The number of illegal aliens on welfare or undocumented aliens from Third World Nations in 2019 range from a documented 63% to numbers as high as 90% for Muslim communities as they believe in polygamy, bigamy, incest and overpopulation per their stated and written agendas.
Pew estimated the total population to be 11.1 million in 2014, or approximately 3 percent of the U.S. population. This “is in the same ballpark” as figures from the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which estimated that 11.4 million illegal immigrants lived in the United States in January 2012. (It’s my guess there are about 20M in 2019 from China, Russia, Middle East, Central America, and Mexico coming by the thousands in caravans and allowed into the USA and scattered about who are not counted or identified).
Legal Definition of Illegal Alien: An alien who enters a country at the wrong time or place, eludes an examination by officials, obtains entry by fraud or enters into a sham marriage to evade immigration laws, also known as “undocumented alien.” In other words, illegal entry into the USA is an illegal alien which is an intentional criminal act or conspiracy of thousands of foreigners conspiring to storm through the U.S. Borders illegally meaning that the entire U.S. Congress who support ILLEGAL ENTRY and Illegal Immigration into the USA is complicit in these crimes in my opinion.
The United States Constitution established that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union, a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot convene”) against domestic violence.”Jan 9, 2019
The Democratic Party and the Rinos in Congress as well as the past non-vetted President of the USA who hasn’t proven, he’s not an illegal alien, based on the fact that he hasn’t produced a Certified U.S. Birth Certificate required by law to be a legal citizen of the USA or natural born Americans. And, Obama signed an Executive Order that every legal naturalized and natural born Americans must produce a Certified U.S. Birth Certificate to obtain a U.S. Passport to travel in and out of the USA and a Legal Certified Drivers License. This raises the question how can he travel in and out of the USA or be taxpayer funded a lifetime pension if he admitted he was born in Kenya vs. held accountable for reciting an oath on the red book in order to to access the highest office in the land in January 2009?
The Bushes, Clinton’s, and Obama’s and their Democratic-Rino supporters as well as appointed Liberal Activist Judges, Governors and Mayors, FBI and USAG and any other loyal supporters on the Left, past and current, in my opinion were hand picked to positions of power it appears in order to carry on with the open border policies that are unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful and a violation of their sworn oaths!
USC Title 18 Sec. 1621 declares: “Whoever having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes, or an oath to be administered, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes to any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.”
The United States is not a Democracy. The U.S Constitution established the United States as a Republic Form of Government operated by the Rule of Law…Legal Law, not Illegal Laws making congress complicit to illegal acts in defiance of the U.S. Constitution as posted in the americanview.com
1. Republican Form of Government; 2. Protection Against Invasion; and 3. Protection of Legislatures and Executive from domestic Violence.
The first assurance is more complicated because the term “Republican Form of Government” is not defined in the Constitution and was not widely written on during the Ratification Debates. However, they did establish seven basic principles necessary to constitute a Republican form of government:
1. There is a strict separation of powers, horizontally and vertically. 2. The government is run by officers governing for a term and only during good behavior. 3. Offices are selected by our election, and not by the appointment of the government itself. 4. The government recognizes that power resides originally in the People (immediately from God). 5. There is a deliberativeness in action and that it is, by the checks and balances, not subject to the whimsical fancy of a few. 6. The government acknowledges the final right of the People to alter or abolish it whenever it usurps the rights for which it was instituted by the People to administer God’s Law.7. The government does not grant entitlements. (americanview.com)
Note, the government acknowledges the final RIGHT of the PEOPLE to alter or abolish it whenever it usurps the Rights for which it was instituted by We The People to administer God’s Law! This acknowledgement is very important because Congress appears to be holding themselves above Legal, Lawful, Constitutional Law, and Sworn Oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution as well as activist Judges and are bypassing Legal Immigration, Legal Identification, Legal Citizenship policies requiring Legal Inspections at Legal Ports of Entry and assimilation as Americans when legally entering into the USA and allegiance to the United States Constitution. Congress is complicit it appears with Illegals violating legal Immigration and invading the nation which is a crime according to federal law.
The U.S. Constitution requires secure borders and calls upon the Americans citizens to form an armed militia to stop any foreign illegal invasion into the USA.
THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND FORM A MILITIA AGAINST ILLEGAL FOREIGN INVADERS (who are entering by the thousands) CANNOT BE INFRINGED UPON!
Second Amendment. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment’s intended scope.
And, according to the Law Books, any taxpayer funded public servant who support illegal violation of the law such as illegal immigration, illegal ID, illegal trafficking of kids and drugs and guns without legal inspections appear to be exempting themselves from the law and “aiding and abetting” and “harboring” and providing “material assistance” to the foreign invaders/aliens/illegals who are labeled criminals upon illegal entering into the USA and may be repeat criminals, murderers, terrorists, rapist, pedophiles, gangs, cartels, foreign enemy spies, or trained jihadist.
AID AND ABETTING ILLEGALS: U.S. Law Books: To facilitate the commission of a crime to promote its accomplishment. Aiding and Abetting is a crime in most jurisdications. Aid or Abet, Counsel and Procure.
HARBORING: U.S. Law Books: The act of affording lodging, shelter, or refuge to a person, esp. a criminal or illegal alien. And, there it is. The Crime of aiding and abetting and harboring illegal aliens according to the United States Law Books which makes Obama and Hillary and their DOJ and Congress and current members who support illegal immigration into “sanctuary cities” and “no-go zones” where the mostly Democrats in public office harbor the illegal aliens and unconstitutionally force American taxpayers to participate in their illegal migration and what appears to be aiding and abetting and harboring and providing monetary assistance and shelter to what the law books define as criminals because they intentionally violated the sovereignty and immigrations laws established by the United States Constitution.
BREACH OF CLOSE: The Democrats and Rinos, Obama and Hillary, and their DOJ and appointees into federal courthouses commit Breach of Close for 10 years: The law books state that “Breach of Close” is the unlawful or unauthorized entry on another person’s land – common law – trespassing!
Illegal Migrants Bringing a Wave of Infectious Diseases!
(Natural News) “Government officials stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border are now seeing an alarming surge in infectious disease among migrants. Reports indicate they are referring upwards of 50 people a day for urgent medical care, including cases of flu and tuberculosis. Most of these cases are children, and nearly a third of the sick are children under the age of five. At the border, authorities say that this wave of illness is unlike anything they’ve ever seen before.”
“The reportis the result of a massive investigation, which was launched after two illegal immigrant children died in U.S. hospitals in December 2018. As the data shows, dozens of sickly children are turning up at the border on a daily basis. Officials conducted a full review of every child in the custody of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP).”
If President Trump does not reverse the Obama-Holder hoax of “Detain and Release” to “Detain and Deport” and CLOSE THE BORDER NOW – America could be gone…..forever.
Click on the Video Below for educational and entertainment purposes only:
Blog Talk Worldwide Online Radio Podcast: Former cable TV producer, writer, host; former am-FM host, award-winning poet, author, and media host, published in “Marquis Who’s Who in America” and “Marquis Who’s Who of American Women,” Colombo is the recipient of many media awards for her humanitarian service as an activist and The Consumer Advocate for Justice, seen and heard on TV radio, mags and newspapers.
Worldwide Radio Podcast: Every Wednesday LIVE – Colombo Chronicles – Host, Rose Colombo speaks with prominent guests from around the nation when they enter into the world of “Authors and Experts” from 12:00 to 1:00 pm noon pst – check time in your area of country! Listen online or by phone – all shows are archived for listening convenience at any time – On 4/10/2019, Lloyd Wright, author of the book, “Triumph Over Hepatitis C” and he will discuss his experiences and tips on fighting back against “Hepatitis C” as well as his research on anti-aging. Tune in at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles
Rose Colombo, award-winning author, Legal Advocate, Activist, and Coach, created the question that rang out across the nation in 2009, when she posed the question, “How is the Obamacare “Mandate” Constitutional or legal? She sent the question to every congressional member in her worldwide Blog, “Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal” and her question was read with her name on the congressional floor and debated in the Supreme Court. (pub (c). 4/6/2012, rev 3/29/2012, rev 4/27/2013, 6/21/2013), rev. 10/8/2013
The End Times are Upon the World! That was the cry of many, but the Mayans may not have been stating that December 12, 2012 was the end of the world, but signaling that it’s the beginning of the end under the Obama regime working within the federal government’s intent to “fundamentally transform ” America taking American to a dangerous crossroad leaving Americans vulnerable to unconstitutional laws that could lead to the death of millions of Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Citizen!
The Obama regime appears to be preparing to implement police states and approving unconstitutional and immoral laws upon the American people. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, asked the question if the federal government’s next mandate is to order that all Americans buy Broccoli, a consumer product or elect a dog for U.S. President if the vetting laws and Identification laws aren’t required!
The US Supreme Court Justices debated the question of the “mandate” which I created and sent to every Congressman, blogged worldwide, and ended up read on the congressional floor with my name. The 112th Congress was negligent and appeared derelict in their duty which requires that they read and study each law in-depth, but they approved 2700 pages of unread laws which shocked the nation and rubber stamped it in favor of Obama when they took bribes for votes!
The duties of a U.S. President are limited, yet this non-vetted and unidentified president has been granted absolute powers to declare the Congress and the Constitution basically as meaningless and stated that he could do whatever he wants and no one can stop him because he has a phone and a pen and he’s the Commander-in-Chief, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief of the American people; in fact, it is the American people who are his Commander-in-Chief and who must take back the pen and the phone before more Americans die on the battlefield, not just the foreign battlefield, but the domestic battlefield on U.S. soil as declared by Obama and Congress.
In an unprecedented announcement, Speaker Pelosi announced that Congress approved the unread mandates, regulations, taxes, and punishments included in Obamacare without performing their duty and studying each law, but she declared Americans would like it after it’s approved so they can find out what’s in it sort of like a Jack in the Box affect, only Americans found out that it was more like “Chuckie” jumping out and attacking and shredding the U.S. Constitution with his knife.
Today, Obama and Congress shamelessly exempt themselves without any constitutional authority from signing up, paying up, and from liability or punishment for passing the unread Obamacare and approving it with a rubber stamp! They discriminate against Americans who aren’t in their inner circle as well as Muslims, Refugees from the Middle East, Donors, Bundlers, SEIU and others.
After the Obamacare red carpet was stained with a series of serious glitches and billions are being spent to try to fix something that can’t be fixed, the truth is that Americans are losing their existing health care coverage and suffering because they can’t access their doctors or treatments or else they’re treatments and medications are unaffordable or the deductibles and premiums are unaffordable, so now there is equality! Not only do illegals, and the Muslims and all those who didn’t have health care prior to Obamacare was implement, it’s a fact that Americans will also be without health care as more hospitals close their doors and retreat to becoming an Urgent Care facility. And, that’s not to mention the millions of jobs that will be lost because of Obamacare! Obamacare is actually making more Americans very sick!
Wake Up, Americans! Are the majority of Americans aware that former impeached President Bill Clinton ordered a study on “Human Capital?” Recently, Bill Clinton was in the news alluding that Americans will like Communism. Hillary Clinton made international news during the congressional hearings when she was questioned about her friend, who was the U.S. Ambassador, and 3 murdered military men killed by terrorist attacks at Benghazi and she angrily replied, “What difference does it make?” Also, President Obama hit the news when asked about murdered American soldiers and the US Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and he casually remarked that they were mere “bumps in the road.”
Human Capital is the study of individuals and allows the federal government to determine the value or lack of value of each human being based upon gender, age, health, possibly religion, politics, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, and IQ or talents versus the lack of worth to the federal government and the cost to the government, i.e., an individuals cost for health care treatments, food, housing, and education. This is a Orwellian 1984 agenda. It represents a Nazi type of agenda with the intent of creating collectivism as well as a means of reducing the population and creating a Master Slave mentality. This is also the dream of creating the Master Race. Yet, the American people have been cheering on the Obama’s and the Clinton’s and support and defend their dream of a New World Order demanding every individual march to the drum beat and comply or else be punished.
Furthermore, past and current congressional members failed to perform their fiduciary duty as required by the 14th Amendment and their sworn oaths and job duties that require each member to read and study each law in-depth! They not only failed to study each law in-depth and assure the American people that each law, mandate, regulation, punishment, tax, and penalty are written in accordance with the US Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans and reflect the best interest of the American people. They failed or refused to read 2700 pages of laws, which in my opinion, appear to be a serious dereliction of duty. But, which public servant working in the taxpayer-funded federal government cares about the US Constitution? After all, it is the non-vetted President Obama who stated more than once that the U.S. Constitution is flawed and that it is “meaningless?” He stated, “The Constitution is a mere charter of negative [liberties] that need to be changed.”
Hypocrites! Too many members of the White House and Congress are hypocrites and they appear to be lawmakers who have turned into law breakers as they hold themselves above the laws which they mandate for the American people and exempt themselves from the laws. Laws are written for criminals as law-abiding citizens don’t violate the laws. Criminals exempt themselves from the law and hold themselves above the law, but law-abiding citizens follow the Rule of Law and public servants swear to uphold U.S. Constitutional law.
Should the American people not ask which constitutional authority is the White House and Congress applying that grants these public servants the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they mandate as constitutional law on U.S. soil, even though they admit that the laws are unread and possibly unconstitutional and illegal? After all, if they weren’t read, how would they know what’s in them when they rubber stamped them “approved.” Perhaps, it would have been wiser to rubber stamp Obamacare, “D.O.A.,” dead on arrival.
Consequently, it’s amazing to me that the American people haven’t bothered to ask how unread and unconstitutional laws can be legal on U.S. soil or how people can be punished on U.S. soil for failing to comply with unread or unconstitutional laws? The fact that they are unread should render them unconstitutional on their face! This problem should raise the question under which constitutional law is Obama and Congress applying that provides them the authority to write discriminatory constitutional laws and grants them the authority to exempt people who they favor or where there are huge conflicts of interest wuch as bundlers, donors, and supporters?
If Obamacare is such a great improvement to the healthcare industry then why would the Obama’s and Sebelius, Biden, and congressional members want to exempt themselves from complying with Obamacare? This problem begs the question if they realize that Page 107 of Obamacare includes making Americans slaves of the Muslim immigrants and refugees living in the USA by referring to Americans on this page as Dhimmis? If you don’t know what a Dhimmi is then you should read up because from my research it means “slave.” In other words, the American people must comply and pay up for their housing, food, and health care. Could this be one of the key reasons why Obama is so adamant about forcing Obamacare upon the American people?
Another key reason for Obamacare appears to be depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and he approved of Infanticide of U.S. Natural Born Citizens while he was a senator which means babies that are born after abortion are left to die. In fact, senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act with the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, and others, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires that Americans pick up the tab to kill these babies with abortion scissors in the USA and around the world! This flies against the moral majority and Christians and Catholics who are being wiped out by terrorists around the world! This Global Poverty Act that Obama signed as an Executive Order about January 2009 diminished the constitutional Right-to-Life and it reflects a depopulation program similar to that of the U.N. Agenda 21.
Obamacare or the ACA or [un]Affordable Care Act is not so affordable. In fact, most people can’t afford to sign up or comply because he’s increased their Health Care Premiums by 40% to 100% depending upon the plan. It’s been reported in the news that about three million Americans are not without health care insurance because of Obamacare as their insurance companies cancelled their plans. In fact, Obamacare robs from Peter to pay Paul. Peter is Medicare and is being robbed by Obama to pay for Obamacare which diminished the services for seniors, veterans, disabled, and the very sick who rely on Medicare.
If Obamacare is such an outstanding and legal benefit being implemented as a national takeover of the healthcare industry by the federal government then why must the federal government mandate excessive taxation, excessive penalties, excessive punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits those excesses? If Obamacare is so wonderful then why are doctors retiring early and expressing their disdain for Obamacare? And, why are businesses closing down and laying off American employees or reducing their work hours which reduces productivity because of Obamacare? This will increase the cost of consumer products to Americans because businesses will be forced to pay higher premiums for their part-time employees including illegal citizens!
Justice Scalia questioned if Obama, who implemented the umbrella law known as ObamaCare, could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off base at all! After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat! And Mayor Bloomberg is pushing what and how much Americans can drink. And, Monsinto, oops, I mean Monsanto, is pushing GMO’s on the world and fighting against labeling their products. Michelle Obama is promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks. The Redistribution program which includes the snack and spy program is described in my latest political satire on how Obamacare and Redistribution of wealth could devastate a free Judeo-Christian Nation that leaves the reader with thought-provoking messages on these agendas and it’s titled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs,Red Necks and Radicals” available at amazon.com
Therefore, Obama is selling snake oil to the American people. His health care is more about death care because his program includes death panels, euthanasia, enslavement to foreigners and donors, and depopulation through same-sex agendas and mandated abortions. His committee of 15 will determine who lives and who dies based upon their evaluation of each individual as human capital who will be no more than a commodity of value or little value to the federal government. As I stated, if Obamacare is such a wonderful health care program then Obama and Biden, Sebelius, senators Reid, Pelosi, and the entire Congress should be the first to sign up, and comply with their own laws, otherwise they are law breakers and holding themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, but are failing to follow the Rule of Law which they swore to do.
How then are the American people not rising up and demanding that Congress Repeal and stop the funding before the tsunami hits that is coming upon U.S. citizens in January 2014? How is it that Obama, Biden, and Congress are determined to destroy the greatest health care industry in the world and force Americans into the worst HMO system that they could ever imagine? Obama and his regime are forcing Americans to pay up front against their will for mandated abortions and death panels or else be punished? Isn’t that like paying for your own demise and the demise of your family, friends, unborn babies, and fellow Americans and helping make the U.S. Natural Born Citizen extinct? How is it that Americans can’t see this as a silent genocide without war or guns on what Obama and congress now refer to as a battlefield? Does it not appear that the federal government is at war with America and Americans?
Should the American citizens not ask why do we need a committee of 15 approved by Obama to determine if they will send Americans to early end of life counseling and pull the plug on grandma or the very sick or veterans? Is this program intended to save money for the federal government so foreign immigrants and illegals and Refugees can move into the USA and access food, housing, and Obamacare without paying up, because it will be paid on the backs of US taxpayers and create a nation of federal government works vs. a nation of citizens on entitlement programs dependent upon the federal government to take care of them since their focus has been on destroying jobs, not creating jobs!
Obviously, Americans will be mere chattel used as commodities and as “human capital” while Obama golf’s at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day to the U.S. taxpayers. The Obama Muslim Brotherhood and non-vetted czars and Congress will allow this committee of 15 to determine who will be euthanized, denied or rationed health care services based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government. Unless the law has been amended, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply and pay up front for Obamacare could spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty, so many will never get a monopoly card to get out of jail.
In fact, the federal government grants to themselves the right to raid and confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the federal government under Obamacare. Obama has enacted a NSA Massive Surveillance Program recently exposed by Whistleblower named Edward Snowden who most believe to be a U.S. hero. It’s my opinion that the massive set of Obamacare laws replaces the Constitution of the United States and denies Freedom, Liberty, and Rights.
Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare. So, why did I write the first blog in 2009 warning the nation and Congress – “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:
1. How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legallyand constitutionally moved forward to hear the unread 2700 pages without review, debate or congressional study prior to hitting the U.S. Supreme Court. Shockingly, the majority of Supreme Court Justices approved the unconstitutional ObamaCare and Justice Robert nailed the last nail into the coffin that would end the best health care system in the world.
Consequently, Justice Elena Kagan refused to Recuse herself from the Obamacare case even though there were documented reports related to her long time association with student Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama. After Harvard received a $20M donation from the Saudi Prince and Obama was named President of the Harvard Law Review, it’s reported that Kagan worked on a project to help create an Islamic Studies program at Harvard. Thereafter, it’s reported that Senator Obama appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and she worked on Obamacare and favored it and represented him in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thereafter, he appointed her as a U.S. Justice right before the Obamacare case was to be decided.
upreme Court while Solicitor General according to the records reported in the news. As a result, the majority of Americans requested that Justice Kagan remove herself from voting on Obamacare, but she refused and Justice Roberts refused to do so. There are many reports of the long time favorable association Kagan and Obama since he attended Harvard when she was Dean Kagan. In fact, the news posted a video that documented a special event when Dean Kagan held a special even for Senator Obama and she stated he was the most brilliant student to ever attend Harvard.
After Obama was elected as a non-vetted U.S. President, he appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him in an eligibility case while she was Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. which is considered unethical according to the Code of Ethics. Also, after Obama took office as an non-vetted U.S. President, Kagan worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General. Obama then nominated Kagan for the position of U.S. Justice. And, the Conflict of Interest is that these behaviors give the appearance of grave Conflicts of Interest as she was elevated thereafter to that of U.S. Justice right before Obamacare was to be voted upon. This behavior is similar to being a guest in Las Vegas by the CEO and Pit Boss of a luxurious casino. You put your money on the table, but the dice are stacked against you without your knowledge and you lose the shirt on your back. These issues casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court. It will take generations if at all possible to restore trust in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices.
2. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to “avoid” Article II of the U.S. Constitution? The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing . It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly non-vetted president who admits that his father is foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Great Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen cannot have a foreign born parent even if born on U.S. soil for that makes him a “naturalized citizen,” but not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.”
The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question and has been the resource used by congress for 237 years.
3. Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,700 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved? After all, it is the fiduciary duty required by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and their duty to the American people that the U.S. Congress read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before the laws are debated in the Supreme Court.
4. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?
5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?
6. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy? How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress to approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign? How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?
7. Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya. So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?
8. Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law, but then how is it that they are writing laws which are on federal land, not located on the soil of the USA? Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?
9. Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earningsafter taxes –earnings are private property– so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings aka private property to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections which the government may or may not provide with complete immunity?
Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty. Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?” In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care. Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution, known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.
So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front money scheme for Obamacare be paid up-front into the government’s fund without accountability as they know nothing, see nothing, and hear nothing when they are caught at wrong doing, and stand on the 5th and refuse to answer the questions as to what happened to the money?
How does it not border on extortion when law-abiding Americans have an imaginary gun placed to their heads by government thugs telling them to pay-up-front with their own earnings, even if they don’t want the consumer product, because consumer products are paid with private property aka personal earnings then taxes are paid. Why are Americans being forced under the threat of fear or punishment to pay up for a consumer product they don’t want and may never receive as the government retains the right to deny or ration said services?
Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Social Security with the promise of saving the taxpayers money for retirement by forced taxation from personal earnings? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than collecting taxes for Medicare and after they divert the money from Medicare, they tell the taxpayers, too bad, we’re denying or cutting services to seniors? Could Obamacare become the a bigger Ponzi scheme than the Redistribution of Wealth? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Patient Dumping at University Hospital for big profits and bonuses by the staff? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than the fraud of the Housing Crisis implemented by Congress and Bankers? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than promising 350,000 infrastructure jobs in exchange for billions of dollars? Could Obamacare be a bigger Ponzi scheme than Solyndra whose bundler owner took the taxpayers money then gave himself and partner big bonuses and wages and bankrupted? Could Obamacare be the biggest Ponzi Scheme to make and create big taxes for depopulation programs and to create big profits for politicians, banksters, and Wall Street?
Is This THE KEY TO ENSLAVE US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS? Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into aprivate enterprise as a for-profit health care industryas well as acting as the federal government with the intent to control a private corporation known as the national health care industry is unconstitutional. So where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to take over private corporations on US soil since they operate on federal soil with “limited powers and are now acting as a dual government and free enterprise running private corporations for-profit and excessive taxes with punishment?
The the truth is that only public servants, military, and foreign immigrants, swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, but the U.S. Natural Born Citizens born to two legal American parents on U.S. soil, who are the only persons eligible to be a U.S. President aren’t required to swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution unless those person enter public service or the military or they are foreign immigrants granted US Naturalized citizenship. U.S. Natural Born Citizens Pledge Allegiance to the U.S. Flag, but that doesn’t protect them under U.S. Constitutional laws if they haven’t sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps, that’s the reason some judges state to U.S. Natural Born Citiznes in court that they have no constitutional rights.
Therefore, how is it that U.S. Natural Born Citizens aren’t swearing an oath by the age of 7 to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? So, if US Natural Born Citizens aren’t sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but public servants, military, and foreign immigrants do swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, then how does that not leave the door open on U.S. soil for public servants to enslave and indefinitely detain U.S. Natural Born Citizens if they aren’t sworn to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution which establishes their guaranteed liberty, freedom and rights? If that’s not true then why are foreign immigrants required to swear an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in order to be guaranteed constitutional protections? Also, how can a federal entity operating on federal land outside of the USA, District of Columbia, which isn’t part of the United States of America, be mandating laws for the separate states in the USA since the federal government is a separate federal entity working on federal soil, granted “limited powers” known as the District of Columbia, which isn’t U.S. soil? Shouldn’t the District of Columbia become a State of the USA so they can operate as part of the USA, so now you know why the Framers granted them “Limited Powers.” Otherwise, a foreign entity known as the federal government working on federal land would stomp their Big Foot on individuals and individual state laws. Today, the federal government has trampled on “limited powers” and are lawless and have gone dictatorial rogue?
Furthermore, Obamacare will lead to collectivism. These laws will force citizens out of the suburbs into the cities where fewer people can be more easily controlled. These laws will reduce the income of the Middle Class U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and no doubt will devastate the quality of life and the quality of the current health care industry. So, should we not ask what is the difference between the mafia, who force people to hand over money against their will and who comply under fear and threat of losing their homes or businesses or be punished? Today, we have a non-vetted president who appears to be punish Americans and represented himself as a poor black kid with a white mother who is golfing at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day for rent and taking $100,000,000 vacations at taxpayer’s expense while denying services and jobs to Americans who pay his wages and pay up for his luxurious lifestyle! Americans are hurting for jobs and struggling to buy gas and food as costs increase, but reckless spending is ok? Has the US Congress and the American people lost their minds and all common sense and logic? It appears that We The People have forgotten that they are the government.
How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws of “limited powers?” If the federal government is taking over and running a private corporation, the health care industry, then shouldn’t the government be providing disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase with their personal earnings against their objections?
The Boards of Consumer Affairs require consumer disclosures, laws, policies, requirements, and regulations of consumer products sold to consumers prior to selling or providing consumer products so is the federal government above those laws, as well? Is the federal government operating as a national health care industry and obtaining business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses or Medical Malpractice Insurance? After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people! As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war or by guns, which is serious. Americans need to demand disclosure on their rights under Obamacare if they experience rationing or being denied services or prescriptions and their rights relating to any damages caused by such actions as well as the right to file lawsuits.
And, even more remarkableis the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, which Obamacare doesn’t favor be ordered to pay up front for services or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.
In fact, Eric Holder, stated, “Americans will be polarized. The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years. There will be no majority race in America.” Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Natural Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV, Due Process of Law, and replacing it with the NDAA Law? In my latest political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,the dinosaurs are confronted with mandated abortions as the elders fight back knowing that mandated abortions will reduce their population. This keepsake exposes the dangers of Obamacare and Redistribution of America’s wealth to anti-American nations.
In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, Obamacare is discriminatory, unconstitutional, unread, and possibly illegal. Obamacare borders on laws mandated in tyrannical Third World nations by dictators who hold themselves above the law as they punish their citizens or cause their demise. Is there any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug on the street, who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else?’ Or a thug who says, “Hand over your money or else?” What if a car dealer told you, “You’re required to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all.” What’s the difference? (Note: This article may be shared but please do not remove content without giving credit to the writer and please don’t plagiarize the content, much appreciated.
LIKE – COMMENT – REBOG – FOLLOW – buttons on top and bottom and welcome
Follow Rose or Rose4Justice
Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse or Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals, at amazon.com
You Tube – Rose4Justice or Rose Colombo
Radio : The Justice Club – google Freedomizer Radio – MWF 11am-12p (pdt) – 2-3p (est-usa) – Call or listen & speak out at (347) 324-3704
Radio: Constitutionally Speaking – Fridays, 4:30-6p (pdt) and 7:30p-9p (est-usa) – google Freedomizer Radio or listen online or ipods or Call & listen & speak out (347) 324-3704
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice Pinterest Google+ Tumbler DIGG
Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational and entertainment purposes only. <a
“Legal Gangsters??” (c) a title coined in 1991 by Rose Colombo – Rose permitted the use of her title for a newspaper article as a co-author published April 9, 1996 – She wrote this latest original article pub. (c) 11/20/2011 as follows:
Legal Abuse is not new! After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress. The new definition of illegal is titled “inversion!” What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress! This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society. They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases; a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws. Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent. These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal job descriptions. They fly in the face of America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form. Every federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty. A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law. A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order. Executive Orders are not laws.
Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down. How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own? In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms. The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey.
As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse. Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.
Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s. One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.” A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs. So, what was the remedy? Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the “machine” in operation.
For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.” Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.” Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.” The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law. They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines.
Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!
An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright, who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:
“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.” He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved. He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else. Crime is crime.”
“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office. He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance. You are relieved of your responsibilities here. Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’ Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.” He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.” He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”
Wright asked, “What are the charges?” The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.” And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”
Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage. Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand. I had no choice at all. Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”
(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”). On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.” ** (This articlemay be shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party.)
Rose Colombo’s self-help Irwin Award Winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, and her latest political satire paralleling todays unconstitutional health care law, Obamacare, with fictional characters that reveal the Orwellian changes coming to America offer Free Reviews and Complimentary Pages at www.amazon.com
written by Rose Colombo, original l(c) pub. 11/16/2011
Occupy Wall Street made a statement whether people agree or not, at least they protested the long arm reaching from the White House into Wall Street and Wall Street reaching into the White House. In fact, the majority of citizens don’t believe they have the power to change the winds that have been shifting in an ugly direction as the federal government is trampling on the constitution and the “limited power” that is established by constitutional law. Americans need to unite against the double standards that have been secretly implemented by past and current congressional members who are filling their bank accounts on the taxpayer’s time and dime!
How many Americans have looked up the definition of “Insider Trading?” Are you aware that insider trading is illegal and that the Department of Justice went after “Martha” who made a pittance on her investment in comparison to former Speaker Pelosi, so how is that?
Insider Trading is: “The use of material, non-public information in trading the shares of a company by a corporate insider or other person who owes a “fiduciary duty” to the company.” How is it that the U.S. Congress no longer believes that they have a “fiduciary duty” to the American people as well as to the corporations who are seeking the approval or denial of bills before the U.S. Congress?
Furthermore, “This is the classic definition. The Supreme Court has also approved a broader definition known as the “misappropriation theory;” the deceitful acquisition and misuse of information that property belongs to persons to whom one owes a duty.”
Obviously, members of congress are provided confidential information which could enhance their financial wealth outside of their job description if they choose to abuse their power on taxpayer’s time and work on personal “insider trading” on the job. Americans don’t pay public servants to work on their personal Wall Street portfolios, but pay them to protect the public from unethical laws. Federal employees are paid by the taxpayers to review corporate laws for approval or denial and determine if it is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congress as they withhold or deny or approve corporate laws presented to them for a vote based on insider trade secrets. How is it not considered a Conflict of Interest or misappropriation as well as deceitful and unethical for congressional members to work on personal “insider trade” secrets for personal financial gain while working as federal employees working on the clock and paid with taxpayer dollars? If congressional members feel it is ethical to use confidential information seeking insider trade secrets on the job than they should clock out!
On its face, it would appear that the Judicial Ethics Committee would be reviewing the Conflict of Interest, as well as the “misappropriation theory” and “deceitful acquisition or “misuse” of information which was intended for the purposes of ensuring the people were protected from big corporations on Wall Street. So, this would explain why the American people are concerned about the U.S. Congress and Executive Office climbing in bed with Wall Street as the people line the streets protesting the double standards.
Last week, the senate voted to deny the American people the right to exercise freedom of speech on the internet by passing a bill titled “Net Neutrality.” It is my suggestion that the American people and media wake up, because “Net Neutrality” circumvents the First Amendment and could devastate careers and corporations who promote themselves on the internet. This is a very dangerous attack against Freedom of Speech by the Obama administration. Such a law could target people who protest against corruption between the White House and Wall Street.
Fortunately, CBS exposed a third big scandal related to the Obama administration and Congress. The U.S. Congress, past and current, passed laws stating that “insider trading” is illegal, but with deceit and non-disclosure, Congress created a double standard for congressional members making “insider trading” for congressional members legal. Congress has written laws that circumvent the laws established for the American people by writing self-serving laws which exempt themselves from complying with the established laws mandated for all citizens and self-protecting laws which prohibit them from being prosecuted for “insider trading.” In other words, what they implemented as “illegal” insider trading for all other citizens is “legal” for congress.
How is it legal and ethical for congressional members to re-write laws which circumvent the laws of the land, while simultaneously abusing their positions of power to write laws that allow them to violate the law with immunity, while on the job and racking up wages paid by the U.S. taxpayers? The American people were led to believe that they voted for congressional representatives who would review corporate documents and determine what is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congressional members on taxpayer’s dime!
Under which congressional authority and fiduciary duty or job description is it that allows congress to circumvent the constitution by writing self-serving laws that protect them from complying with laws and from punishment, so they can fill their bank accounts, by creating double standards which favor congress?
So, how does congress justify their “insider trading” on the job for their personal financial gain when they are paid to protect the people from criminals who are arrested for insider trading?” For example, a bank clerk wouldn’t be allowed to study the customer’s portfolios and discuss insider trade secrets on the job without being fired, yet there are congressional members using their time on the job paid by taxpayers for personal financial gain.
Which constitutional law or fiduciary job description did Rep. Pelosi apply that justifies her using confidential information which is the property of the government as personal information which in my opinion is unethical with the intent of using the “insider trading” secrets for her personal financial gain? How is it okay for any employee to use information that belongs to the government or to a corporation for personal use? In the private sector, employees would be fired.
Is it ethical for congress and the executive office to write self-serving, self-regulatory, and self-protecting laws for self-gain that provides them exemptions from compliance and exemption from punishment after mandating that all other citizens must comply with the laws which they mandate or else be punished such as “insider trading” and “Obama care?”
Which constitutional amendment or the federal job description provides congress the authority to write approve, and enforce “insider trading” as illegal for the American people, but “legal for congressional members?
Consequently, I have determined that some congressional members believe that they have the authority to abuse their positions of power, even if it involves ethics violations and conflicts of interest to provide themselves immunity when they use “insider trading” secrets for financial gain by deeming “insider trading” as “illegal” for the citizens, but “legal” for congressional members who commit the same white-collar crime without fear of being punished.
In conclusion, as long as the American people remain passive and accept that lawmakers can become law breakers by re-writing laws, manipulating the law, changing laws that are self-protecting from compliance and prosecution, the American people will be faced with double standards, unconstitutional laws, and a constitution that their leaders believe the words of Obama when he stated in 2001 and 2008 that the constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] that is “meaningless.” **( This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, is the producer and host of former cable TV and talk radio show, “Issues of the Day.” She’s been seen and or heard on radio and TV and red in major and local newspapers. Read Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her 2 books, Irwin Award Winner, self-help book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire depicting fictional characters with an Orwellian story paralleling today’s corrupted political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,” at www.amazon.com