“Legal Gangsters??” (c) a title coined in 1991 by Rose Colombo – Rose permitted the use of her title for a newspaper article as a co-author published April 9, 1996 – She wrote this latest original article pub. (c) 11/20/2011 as follows:
Legal Abuse is not new! After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress. The new definition of illegal is titled “inversion!” What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress! This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society. They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases; a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws. Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent. These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal job descriptions. They fly in the face of America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form. Every federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty. A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law. A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order. Executive Orders are not laws.
Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down. How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own? In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms. The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey.
As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse. Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.
Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s. One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.” A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs. So, what was the remedy? Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the “machine” in operation.
For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.” Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.” Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.” The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law. They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines.
Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!
An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright, who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:
“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.” He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved. He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else. Crime is crime.”
“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office. He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance. You are relieved of your responsibilities here. Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’ Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.” He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.” He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”
Wright asked, “What are the charges?” The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.” And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”
Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage. Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand. I had no choice at all. Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”
(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”). On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.” ** (This articlemay be shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party.)
Rose Colombo’s self-help Irwin Award Winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, and her latest political satire paralleling todays unconstitutional health care law, Obamacare, with fictional characters that reveal the Orwellian changes coming to America offer Free Reviews and Complimentary Pages at www.amazon.com
By Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/13/2011, Rev. 4/7/2012, 2017
Hooray for Hollywood! Liberal Democrats gathered support for the unvested president Barack Hussein Obamaaka Barry Soetoro, who promised to bring “change” to America. At a Hollywood event, Obama stated to the audience that he was going to attack them with drones and they laughed.He said, “You think I’m joking.” Well, I never think he’s joking! And the audience continued to laugh and applaud. Today, Americans are faced with a unvested president who allegedly holds himself above congressional and constitutional law and seems to ignore our democratic process. America is a Republic which is operated according to the Rule of Law.
Furthermore, the news reported Obama is appointing a panel to create a secret “kill list” of U.S. Citizens, who could be murdered by assassination, based on Obama’s accusation only or his non-vetted Czars and possibly his Muslim Brotherhood appointees. They could accuse Americans living on foreign or domestic soil. U.S. Citizens could be accused of being “dangerous” or “right-wing extremists” which is based upon political and religious affiliations, activism, and published writings or accused of being a dissident. In other words, Americans will be denied their U.S. Constitutional rights to exercise “due process of law” guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. Guilty as charged even if innocent! Isn’t that how tyrannical dictators and communist dictators operate by punishing people who oppose their government’s laws, mandates, and regulations? Compliance vs. non-Compliance? So, if a secret “kill” list is enacted allowing the executive branch to target Americans for assassination without due process of law, would that include witnesses and whistleblowers who would testify against the government?
Remember, that the NDAA law reflects the tyrannical laws inflicted upon citizens of Third World nations ruled by a tyrannical leader with an iron fist, not constitutional laws. In other words, Congress has created a new law titled NDAA which shreds due process of law equally important with Article II, but under NDAA, due process of law is the most important law inserted into the U.S. Constitution for it is the only law that prevents tyranny and genocide. Is everyone in Hollywood still laughing? In fact, the news reported most recently, Homeland Security has been instructed to fly drones over America and spy on the American people!
Although, the president’s Executive Order allegedly provides himself with the unprecedented authority to pick and choose which Americans on foreign or U.S. soil will be accused and labeled killed or assassinated, the U.S. Congress, who is the only body that can make and approve laws, is silent! They are allowing the nation to be run by excessive Executive Orders without congress exercising the fiduciary duty and upholding the 14th Amendment as required by law. In fact, the 112th Congress led by senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham implemented the NDAA law that targets Americans for assassination and indefinite detentions through Congress which shocked the American taxpayers! Yet, congress exempts themselves from unconstitutional and unread laws since 2009.
Recently, the news reported that Obama ordered a “hit” on an American citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki who the government reported dead, but the government also stated that they didn’t retrieve the body, but how is it they didn’t retrieve the body for positive identification? Although, al-Awlaki converted to the Muslim faith and spoke out heatedly against American policies, there weren’t any criminal charges filed against him by the U.S. government. He wasn’t armed or captured and he wasn’t provided due process of law, although he allegedly had been reported to have visited the Pentagon without incident where he could have been arrested. Shockingly, al-Awlaki’s assassination and his minor child’s assassination occurred prior to the approval of the NDAA Law. Shouldn’t this beg the question which constitutional authority Obama and his administration used to provide the executive office with authority to write an Executive Order granting a U.S. President the right to assassinate any American accused as an enemy of the government even if they could be captured? Yet, al-Awlaki’s killing and that of his minor child, were ordered before the NDAA Law was enacted and while due process of law was intact. In fact, the NDAA law circumvents constitutional law.
Therefore, which constitutional authority was applied that provided the executive branch to by-pass due process of law and the judicial branch and order “hits” on American adult and an American minor child and how is the NDAA Law in the best interest of the majority of the American people? The NDAA law defies due process of law guaranteed by U.S. Constitution. Also, the anti-war.com blog is an article that states “Obama has Gaddafi’s 16-year-old son, friends killed at dinner,” but this information is very difficult to find in main stream news as many articles and videos are being made unavailable for public scrutiny.
Also, Obama is named in a myriad of eligibility lawsuits filed by attorneys, i.e., Philip J. Berg, esq., and Orly Taitz, esq., as well as other prominent lawyers and military officers, and Sheriffs alleging that there are numerous computer experts alleging Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries. The news reported that FBI complaints have been filed by computer experts. Ironically, Obama has allegations filed against him with the courts and FBI, yet he was allowed to order a “hit” on al-Awlaki and his minor child, who didn’t have any criminal charges filed against them at the time Obama ordered the assassination of unarmed American citizens versus ordering their capture. So, why is Congress remaining silent on the NDAA law that targets Americans based on accusation only, which opens the door to legal abuse and possibly wrongful murders?
Americans should be demanding to know why congress is silently allowing Obama to rule the nation by Executive Order through excesses of mandates and requirements, excessive regulations, excessive taxation, unconstitutional punishment and excessive penalties making the Middle Class poorer while Obama approves in excess of $1 billion in U.S. tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood with knowledge that their stated strategic goal is to wipe out Israel and Western civilization, Executive Orders were not intended to be used and abused so one man could rule the United States of America without congressional or constitutional authority and redistribute the wealth to foreign ant-American nations. The congress and DOJ are trampling on the Rule of Checks and Balances. Americans are witnessing all three branches of government morphing into one branch of government. The Obama Nation!
Congress allowed a non-vetted man with a foreign-born father and Subject of Britain to grant himself absolute power by writing and approving a myriad of Executive Orders from day one after taking office, but under which constitutional or state law is it that provides a public servant the legal right to conceal his identity and credentials from all branches of the federal government and the government, We The People ? President Obama approves excessive Executive Order and by-passes congress and usurps constitutional authority.
Obama declared his excessive Executive Orders as the new laws of the land. Obama and congress usurped due process of law by approving the NDAA Law as well as approving an extension of the Patriot Act. Due Process of Law is the only constitutional law established for the prevention of tyranny and genocide. In fact, Obama’s excessive signing of Executive Orders caused congressional members, Dan Lundgren and Ron Paul to state on the record, on the congressional floor ,that Executive Orders are not laws. The only reason that Congress is silent, in my opinion, is that they approve of Obama’s usurping the congress and constitution by Executive Order or else they would exercise their authority and Repeal and Defund.
Well then, how is it possible for a non-vetted president to use tax dollars without congressional approval and appoint a panel of federal government non-vetted Czars paid by U.S. taxpayers to create a “hit list”that’s intended to murder Americans by assassination without Due Process of Law as well as eliminate due process of law from the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees U.S. Natural Born and long time generational legal citizens the right to access their Miranda Rights, and a lawyer. Yet, the Obama administration and USAG, Eric Holder insist that the Muslim Radicals involved in 911 or other criminal acts be read Miranda Rights and provided Due Process of Law. On the other hand, U.S. Natural Born Citizens if accused of being an enemy combatant are denied their constitutional rights to exercise Due Process of Law by implementing the NDAA law as well as the Patriot Act.
In other words, the NDAA law prohibits Americans accused by the U.S. government of being an enemy combatant from accessing charges filed, a lawyer, a trial or appeals as reported in the news by Senator Feinstein. In other words, if U.S Natural Born Citizens are accused of being a “dissident,” they could accused and punished and left to rot in a jail cell.
Therefore, Americans must ask under which constitutional authority and fiduciary job duty is the 112th Congress or Obama applying that provides them the authority to shred due process of law and implement the NDAA law. The NDAA law or Patriot Act isn’t in the best interest of the American people, but could result in their demise or punishment. It’s crucial that U.S. citizens who are the taxpayers peacefully resist and denounce the federal government using U.S. tax dollars to implement the assassination of American citizens, unarmed Americans, who could be accused of being an enemy combatant on U.S. or foreign soil. So, are Americans being forced to pick up the tab for the Muslim Brotherhood to continue their stated strategic goals against Western Civilization. Are Americans being forced to pay for the possibility of their own assassinations and indefinite detentions if targeted by the Obama regime? Even more amazing is that Americans are paying the wages to employ the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House! How is this possible?
Remarkable as it is – Americans and Brits are losing their constitutional freedom and liberty. Actually, I read that the lineage of British royalty is tied to Germany and that several members of British royalty married Germans and embraced the nazis. The articles read that British Royalty changed their German names to English surnames during WWII as the English people intensely opposed the Nazi’s.
So, it shouldn’t surprise the Brits if they do their homework to realize how their government may have been infiltrated subtly with public servants who oppose freedom and liberty. Most recently, Obama toasted his allegiance to the queen which hit international news. He obviously upset the Queen as she scolded him and stopped him, realizing that his allegiance is supposed to be to the United States of America, but then he is a British Subject. He admits that his father comes from a long line of Muslims and his dad, Barack Obama was born as an African in Kenya and Kenya was a Colony of Britain making Obama sr. a Subject of Britain meaning Obama inherited his fathers birthright at birth in 1961 as a Subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948; thus, Obama did not inherit a U.S. Natural Born Citizen birthright from his foreign-born father, but a foreign-born birthright. And, being a African from Kenya and a British subject does not tie him to the civil rights movement of the Black Americans, who were slaves, and known as non-persons until they were freed.
Therefore, how is it that a U.S. President and a U.S. Congress could even consider establishing laws that usurp “due process of law” for the American citizens who elected them and pay their taxpayer funded wages which is contrary to their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution. How is it that they’re OK with compiling secret “kill” lists of Americans based upon accusation only who may be 100% innocent to be killed on domestic or foreign soil including minor children? Are Americans being used as sacrifices for political or religious reasons?
Furthermore a “hit” list refers to murdering people by assassination, the word murder is switched to read “assassination” because it has a connotation that the person is a criminal who is being murdered without due process of law, but based upon accusation only.Just the fact that the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice would even consider “hit lists” and assassinations and shredding of the U.S. Constitution is evil, immoral, unconstitutional, and disgraceful in the United States of America! Our Forefathers must be turning over in their graves.
How then shall we refer to the Obama assassination “hit” list? Will Obama and his panel decide who shall be murdered by assassination based on an accusation only? Isn’t denying due process of law what the Communist Chinese do to their citizens? Nope, Obama and Congress didn’t agree to an assassination list targeted at foreign enemy nations or countries such as Kenya or Afghanistan, Iran, or China, Syria, Libya, Iraq or South Korea, and so forth, but they’re targeting American citizens, who pay Obama’s wages of $400,000 per year, as well, as pick up the unlimited tab for his excessive $100,000,000 vacations.
How is it American’s aren’t asking how is it logical for the federal government to implement an unconstitutional program and create a “hit” list that targets American citizens as potential enemies and place their names on “hit lists” for assassination, while exempting foreigners, foreign immigrants, refugees, and illegals? Is the U.S. federal government trampling on their “limited” powers while stepping on the U.S. Constitution with their “Big Foot” and creating a new business using U.S. tax dollars for programs which might be viewed as “guns for hire” making U.S. Natural Born Citizens a commodity for profit by “hit” men? After all, the DOJ under Obama’s watch used U.S. Stimulus tax dollars to purchase U.S. untracked guns and sell them to untracked cartel members in Mexico! It seems that Obama’s programs always create fear and increase taxes because he leads people to believe that he must save the nation by creating more national debt! In 2008, his Chicken Little speech, “The sky is falling” – actually worked. Well, President Bush left a national debt headed upwards of one trillion dollars, but Obama spent $5 Trillion in 2 1/2 years!
Some people may say, “Yes, but some times, really bad people should be murdered so this way, we can just get rid of them.”
The Rule of Law is established for a reason. Innocent people are murdered and die from time to time by law enforcement, but officers are held accountable, so people are protected from wrongful deaths. But under the NDAA Law, is it legal for the non-vetted president and his non-vetted czars to target Americans without recourse?
The Nazis started off with one name on their “hit” list. And, after the first “hit” was completed and the people said nothing, they went onto the second name on the list and the people said nothing. Afterwards, it became easier and easier until millions were dragged out of their homes by gun point (which has happened on US soil) and murdered the people who were too frightened to speak out as the army grew bigger and bolder and more insensitive to murdering people. So, Hitler was emboldened as he was unopposed. He created his National Civilian Security Force and they marched into each city and forced their way into the privacy of the citizen’s homes and dragged them into the street and either executed them or enslaved them into concentration camps because they were good people who did nothing to stop them when the writing was on the wall.
In 2001 and 2008, Obama stated that congressional and constitutional authority is “meaningless.” Think about that! Why would a U.S. President boldly state that the U.S. constitution is “meaningless” after swearing an oath to uphold the constitution? He said, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than a “mere charter of negative laws [liberties} that need to be changed” in 2001, 2008 and 2012, but those videos and articles are probably scrubbed from the internet as well.
Of course, people may ask, “Who cares?” He says he’s an American and said that he was born in Hawaii and that’s good enough for me.” Well, then why isn’t it good enough for all illegals just to say that they were born in the United States? The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen must be adhered to so a foreigner can’t usurp the presidency and insert foreign laws, foreign history into U.S. history books, and foreign religions that force Americans to comply or else be punished on U.S. soil! This is how anti-American foreign enemies change and transform a nation into their nation while the people sleep, they conspire.
Remember, “Every congressional member and public servant pledges their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, not to a public servant. But, today, the congress, senate, and judiciary appear to be more concerned with protecting public servants from the Constitution than protecting the Constitution from public servants.” (C) 1989
You may say,“But, public servants can’t assassinate American citizens or throw them into prisons without due process of law in America.”
Of course, many people ask, “Who cares if Obama or Panetta ordered the murder by assassination of a war criminal whose name is Osama bin Laden?” He was the mastermind behind murdering 3,000 Americans on 911, so who cares about due process of law? In other words, those people believe in a barbaric lynch mob and mob rule, but it is “Due Process of Law, which sets America apart from the rest of the world.
(Yet, has anyone asked how many people, victims, whistleblowers and witnesses, or First Responders have died because of 911 between 9/11/01 and 2013?)
But, I tell you that the Rule of Law should not be violated unless you don’t care that you or your loved ones names can be placed on a “hit” list! The U.S. Constitution is what protects the guilty and the innocent from tyranny and mob rule executions and preserves a civilized nation. Could this be an ungodly and immoral agenda with the intent of sensitizing Americans so they ignore the stories similar to the rumors that rang out in Europe when the people did nothing, while they watched millions of people executed, enslaved, imprisoned, experimented upon, and exterminated?
Should a nation of U.S. Natural Born Citizens not demand that their U.S. Congress repeal and deny funding for illegal and unconstitutional or immoral laws that target Americans for indefinite detentions and assassinations based on accusations while these lawmakers exempt themselves from the same tyranny that they approve? How then would Americans know if they are targeted as an “extremist” or “radical” or “dangerous?” Does the list consist of Christians, or Catholics and Jews? Does the list include heterosexuals or citizens who believe in pro-life or traditional marriage? Does the hit list consist of citizens who are Conservatives and Republicans or Libertarians? Does the “hit” list include Blacks or Hispanics or Whites or Italians or Jews? Does the “hit” list include Pregnant Women or Sick or Disabled? How about the Elderly, Veterans or U.S. Military who lets say believe in God or read the Bible? Does the list include members of the Tea party or the Oath Keepers? How then shall the American people know which citizen names will be added to the “hit” list by the panel consisting of non-vetted Czars?
Of course, you may ask, “Who cares about Article II, anyway? Who cares if a President of the United States is a “U.S. Natural Born” citizen?
Furthermore, Article II is the most important law of the land! There is a legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen that clarifies that if a baby is born on U.S. soil and one parent is foreign-born then the baby is not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be a U.S. President – Period! The baby doesn’t inherit a U.S. Birthright from their foreign-born father as required by U.S. law, but inherits a foreign-born birthright from his or her father making the baby a “naturalized” citizen only. The birthright guarantees U.S. Natural Born Citizens the right and privilege to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but if a usurper steals a U.S. Natural Born Citizen’s Birthright and is elected as a U.S. President, then that person has denied a U.S. Natural Born Citizen their natural-born Birthright, who is legally eligible, to be a U.S. President. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen Birthright must be cherished and upheld to preserve Western Civilization for it is preserved by our forefathers as a right to be an eligible U.S. President and this is the key that separates U.S. Natural Born Citizens from all Naturalized citizens.
Ironically, to my knowledge, there aren’t any senate hearings scheduled for an investigation into the assassination of an unarmed American and his minor child who should have been protected under the U.S. Constitution with the right to exercise due process of law, but were assassinated, prior to the NDAA being enacted.
I think we all agree that Osama bin Laden was a dangerous leader who is reported to target America on 911. His death was reported to have been killed or died from kidney disease 9 different times in the news by political leaders between Dec. 2001 and 2012. Even a former CIA agent stated that Osama’s body was on ice and those reports were in the news between December 2001 -2011. Admittedly, Obama and or Panetta ordered the assassination of the unarmed Osama sitting in a living room holding a remote versus his capture and tried. The news reported that Obama and Panetta ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean and called it a burial at sea which upset the Muslim nation. The government published photos of Osama’s assassination, but later retracted them stating all the photos were fakes. I read that Muslims don’t bury their leaders at sea. The news alleged Obama ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean [and fed to the sharks]. The fact that Osama wasn’t captured, even though he was unarmed, or his dead body not turned over to the proper law enforcement authorities for positive examination, left doubt in the minds of the world, especially since the assassination occurred right before elections.
The news reported that Obama and Biden were reported in the news to have exposed the identities of the Navy Seal heroes which is unprecedented. Prior to 2009, the government wanted war criminals captured alive, if at all possible, so they could interrogate them and extract information which is what President Bush ordered after 911. For example, if a law enforcement officer killed a suspect then dumped the suspect’s body into the ocean, even if the suspect was considered an evil person, the police officer would probably be sitting in a jail cell. Now, we’ll never know what Osama or Al-Awlaki or his teenage son, or Gaddafi or his teenage son, grandkids, and family knew about the radicals attacking the USA and declaring war on America on September 11, 2001.
Of course, people may ask, “But, who cares if he dumped Osama’s body at sea?”
Again, the Rule of Law must be followed by every citizen including public servants if justice is to prevail. The U.S. federal government spent billions of tax dollars over 10 years for the capture of Osama bin Laden. But, Obama and Panetta’s assassination orders reported in the news of foreign leaders should send shivers down the spine of every leader in every nation, as none of the assassinated leaders involved were armed at the time of their murders. In fact, al-Awlaki was an American, who wasn’t charged with a crime. On the other hand, Libyan leader, Gaddafi, didn’t attack America. So, how does anyone know who could be next victim, whether a foreigner or an American citizen, under the NDAA Law approved by the 112th Congress and Obama. For example, could an enemy be seen as a whistleblower or a witness? The NDAA law leaves massive room for abuse.
Of course you may ask, “If a U.S. President thinks someone is a danger to the government then he should put a “hit” out on him?”
The Rule of Law in America makes it clear that a “hit” list and gathering names of Americans to be placed on a “hit” list in my opinion equates to a conspiracy to commit murder usually thought of as some thing a “gang” or “organized criminals” or mafia or cartels do. “Hit” lists are utilized by criminals and shouldn’t be used against America’s law-abiding Americans accused by their government without probable cause and a search warrant and due process of law. This is why this nation established due process of law to protect the innocent. We have a Department of Justice which many believe has turned into a department of injustice.
Of course, people may say, “Who cares if Obama had Osama murdered by assassination, after all, he was a war criminal. Besides, it would cost millions of tax dollars to try him.”
I stress, the Rule of Law must be followed in a Republic. Think about that! If it’s okay to assassinate unarmed people without constitutional or congressional authority then what’s to prevent a government from assassinating whistleblowers and witnesses and call it legal so the witnesses can’t testify against public servants or prominent people in courts of law? It could establish a pattern that it’s the right of the government to decide who is an enemy and silence people or dump their bodies into the ocean or shred the evidence. It would have been interesting to learn what details that Osama and Gaddafi could have provided to the world that may have shed some light on the radicals or 911.
But people say, “Who cares if Obama ordered the murder by assassination of al-Awlaki, he was a very bad man.”
Should the U.S. Congress and judiciary fail to investigate the facts in the Osama and al-Awlaki assassinations then how shall the truth and the facts be reported for public review or how shall you defend yourself if accused under the NDAA law?
Of course, many people will ask, “Who cares if Obama attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and killed his grandkids and freedom fighters, he was a very bad man” without the approval of the U.S. Congress or constitutional authority?
And, once again, I stand firm that the Rule of Law must be strictly followed or Americans shall reap the tears of tyranny should the citizens not demand that congress and law enforcement uphold the constitution, especially Article II and Article IV and due process of law. The constitution grants congress authority and power to declare war, not the president. We mustn’t make excuses that just because one president or public servant violated constitutional law that it’s okay for the next one to do so. Besides, Gaddafi didn’t threaten America, but he was Obama’s long time friend and supporter, who referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and this begs the question how he suddenly became Obama’s enemy and ended up #2 on Obama’s “hit” list, and begging for his life – unarmed – assassinated under Obama’s orders. If someone steals a cookie, should the next kid be allowed to steal 2 cookies, too? If that’s the case, it won’t be long before all the cookies and the cookie jar are stolen. If someone kills a dog because he’s barking, not attacking, is the murder of the dog justifiable?
Of course, many people say, “But, they are all bad guys. Who cares if they were murdered by assassination?”
Well, we have bad people in America too, including evil politicians in some cases. We, too, experience bad people exposed in our government. Americans probably have some bad friends or relatives secretly hidden away in their closets. How then shall we complain and justify if a good and innocent American citizen enters a foreign nation and is murdered by assassination and we complain “evil” if we don’t follow the Rule of Law?
Of course, people will say, “But, those American citizens shouldn’t have gone into that country, they were stupid.”
Of course, people do stupid things, but assassinating people because they do some thing stupid or citizens who oppose political or religious agendas shouldn’t be a reason to compile a list of citizen names to be included or added onto a “hit” list and unknown to the citizens to be targeted for murder by assassination or indefinite detention. They already compile secret no fly lists and innocent Americans are denied the right to get on an airplane without recourse. Think about that! Isn’t that what Hitler did? We watch movies of communist and Third World nations run by tyrannical leaders who assassinate and indefinitely detain people in their countries without due process of law, but are we now facing the words of “compliance” and “non-compliance?”
Listen up! Call, email, write, your congressional members and demand that they Repeal the unconstitutional NDAA law which not only targets Americans but circumvents and shreds Article IV, of the U.S. Constitution, Due Process of Law and Article II and vetting policies as required by our government’s congressional members and Secretary of State and Speaker of the House. It’s written into my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” the following – “Without DueProcess of law, there is nothing, – nothing but tyranny.”
Wake up, all you sleepy heads! Perhaps, it’s time to unite across the nation and March on D.C. peacefully and legally with the Sheriffs and Constitutional lawyers. The U.S. Congress must stop the insanity of shredding the U.S. Constitution and targeting law-abiding Americans who pay their wages. What is happening in America is insane! In fact, there are published articles reporting that the President of France, Sarkozy, met with Obama, and allegedly stated that Sarkozy said that Obama is “insane.” I don’t know about that, but I do believe most Americans believe he has an unconstitutional agenda. And, I don’t care what anyone thinks, creating a federal panel of unidentified czars and a secret “hit” list of law-abiding Americans by selective processes, which includes illegally spying on citizens, and using U.S. tax dollars is evil. And even more evil is collecting names of Americans accused of being an enemy of the United States without being provided due process of law and placed on a “kill list” to be murdered is insane! These unconstitutional laws deny U.S. Constitutional Law, Article II, due process of law, the Right-to-Life, unalienable God-given rights, and killing U.S. Citizens, not foreign enemies, but U.S. Citizens is no different from pre-meditated murder in my opinion.
Shame on the 111th and 112th U.S. Congress! It’s shocking that elected public servants would approve indefinitely detaining or assassinating Americans, which is unconstitutional, immoral, unjust, unfair, and despicable. It’s ridiculous that American leaders would declare American citizens “guilty” as accused which reflects the tyrannical laws of barbarians. It’s stunning that America’s leaders would approve secret kill lists and assassinate American adults and minor kids accused of a crime without due process of law. This raises the question if the government is reducing the population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens and making room for foreigners and refugees and Communist China and Russia to claim U.S. districts of soil? These serious unconstitutional laws should be worrisome to Americans, as it appears that Obama and Congress, the new immigrants, refugees, and illegals are opted out of the unconstitutional laws approved by Obama and Congress, as well as the punishments, being implemented against U.S. natural-born and legal generational naturalized citizens, i.e., NDAA Law, Patriot Act, secret Kill Lists, Obamacare and the Immigration Bill.
Rose says, “A successful civilized genocide through mandates that wipe out freedom, liberty, rights, sovereignty, the right-to-life, health care, as well as silence a nation, a nation that has been slumbering for far too long, can be argued and perceived by evil doers as an act of genius if one views evil as a good thing for the benefit of those who implement the evil acts; thus the evil doers rationalize their acts against humanity as justifiable and implement evil deeds without conscience.” (C) 2011
Rose Colombo, long time legal and political activist, helping victims of legal abuse become survivors for 25 years. For more information visit Rose’s website – http://www.colombochronicles.com –
Read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s Award Winner self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” or her latest Political Satire with humorous fictional characters and an Orwell 1984 type of fictional story that parallels today’s political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” google www.amazon.com
Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings? Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government. Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money? After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement? Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if, Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?
Cut the Spending! Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama! He is the Print and Spend President. Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010! Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?
One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more! And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans! I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.
So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund. If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money. Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!
Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.
In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month. The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care. Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.
In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama! No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth. The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years. The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China. Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs. It’s small businesses that create more jobs. Instead, Obama created more government jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.
Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government? Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes. Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients. Social security is money earned, not welfare. Not only is Obama’s threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living. So, one must wonder if Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?
Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate. Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress. In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund. Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks, was deposited into a “Trust” Account.
Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property? How is diverting the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens considered ethical? How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff. Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.
Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable. In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected. Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.
So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?
In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama. Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA. China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?
About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. . On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters. Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.
Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars. Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk. Obama fired off 221 tomahawks – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people. Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news. He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.
Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt. For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953. Think about that!
How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president. In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008. Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.
But, Obama made history. Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion! He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.
Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder. Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?
Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.
Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt? China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.
The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work. The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A. Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations. He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A. Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.
In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078. Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years. By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615. In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion. But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.
But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion! Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there. He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher. So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?
2011: U.S. Population = 311, 756,198 (2008 = 304,421,946)
2011: U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291 (2008 = 108,228,953)
2011: Official Unemployed = 14,055,369 (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)
2011: Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)
2011: State Local Employees = 15, 892,215
2011: Federal Employees = 4,305,706
2011: U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347
2011: U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)
2011: U.S. Families = 82,102,337 (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]
2011: Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907 (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]
2011: Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470
2011: Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799
2011: Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising
2011: Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising
2011: Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising
2011: Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138
2011: Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]
2011: Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)
2011: Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising
2011: Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising – a substantial decrease as of 2011)
2011: Assets Per Citizen = $242,722 (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))
2011: U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]
2011: Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)
2011: Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281
2011: Total Debt Per Family = $669,109
2011: Savings Per Family = $6,953 [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]
2011: U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit: $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *
2011: National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503
2011: National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747
2011: Income Tax: $946,651,562,999 and rising *
2011: Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising
2011: Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]
2011: U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)
I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans. Another example of waste is the multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs. But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second
Note: The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!
Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!
(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt). Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas. You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com