Child Trafficking and Female Trafficking is big business for organized criminals who will pay top dollar for these human commodities as tens of thousands of kids are kidnapped in the USA and from foreign countries around the world. Today, it’s reported that tens of thousands of unidentified foreign minor kids are being trafficked into the USA but reported as “migrated” into the USA without parents or guardians who have gone missing. How is this even legal, ethical, lawful, moral, or constitutional? The numbers are significantly increasing as of 2002 when the Congress published a reports into the Congressional Record confirming that after Drug Trafficking and Gun Trafficking are the top two crimes and that Human Trafficking, which is Slave and Sex Trafficking as well as using kids as drug couriers, or selling or renting out kids and women as sex slaves, is the #3 criminal crisis which most Americans aren’t paying any attention. Since 2009, the Federal Government with their big foot continues to open our borders wider than ever despite the knowledge of these crimes. America has a serious problem and these kids aren’t being protected by the Courts because of the failure to uphold the laws at the borders and the lack of funding and manpower within the courts. In fact, even the courts must provide a guardian ad litem before they can make decisions about these unidentified domestic or foreign kids. How do they know they aren’t being kidnapped or sold to ISIS and cartel members by poor parents for big profits so they can use them and abuse them. How do they know if these minor kids will be gang raped and killed?
Well, hat off to Rose Colombo’s guest, Lauren Martel, dynamic attorney-at-law has taken on this cause. She’s not standing by and doing nothing about it! MSM may be ignoring this Bombshell Story, but the Attorney Martel has filed a Lawsuit naming Obama, the Federal Government, Governor Niki Haley, and others who are ignoring these problems involving minor kids. She’s exposing this enormous Scandal and shining a light on one of the most serious and increasing scandals of our time that’s been swept away, so Radio Host, Rose Colombo, a Crusader and award-winning author on injustices is more than willing to help Lauren Martel, Attorney and Whistle Blower let the world know that Americans need to step up to the plate and help protect the minor kids from foreign nations and in the USA where the increased numbers of missing kids is on the back burner. It’s a crime for the elected representatives in this nation to sweep this serious matter away without creating serious oversight to secure the borders and identify minor kids without parents or guardians entering our nation by the thousands and then go missing. The Human Traffickers use these kids as human commodities for profit and they could be kids who are actually being sold or kidnapped and trafficked under the guise, perhaps as refugees. Most of these kids are unidentified, non-vetted and the system doesn’t know where most end up. LIKE – COMMENT BELOW
Rose Colombo will be announcing her new radio show so stay tuned…..coming soon. Be sure to read and share the informative Blogs that are posted that hit serious topics affecting our everyday lives. You can Like – Follow- and Comment below.
Read complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’a 5 Star Review and award-winning books at amazon.com – Fight Back Legal Abuse – and – Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals – Type in her name, Rose Colombo at http://www.amazon.com and check out her Facebook/Rose Colombo – Facebook/The Justice Club – Twitter@Rose4Justice – Pinterest/Rose Colombo or Pinterest/Rose4Justice – Tumblr/Rose4Justice – Google+/Rose4Justice
Over the years as a beauty consultant and political activist, Rose Colombo as stated for decades, “We are our thoughts.” She believe that even though the world is bombarded with negative social injustices and even downright evil people with negative thoughts who don’t like themselves, she has told her family, friends, and customers, if we have a wall blocking us from moving forward that we must figure out how to go over it, under it, around it, or through it, because the mind is a powerful tool.” Rose delves into the pre-planned invasion of illegals and Muslim foreigners that was signed as a Presidential Order back in 2009 before there were any refugees. Unfortunately, many of the illegals and alleged refugees linked to Hamas or members of Hamas, a terrorist group, may be foreigners under the guise as refugees who will remain undocumented and unidentified. Rose explores the fact that world news reports many of these migrants are young men between 18-45 years of age entering Western Civilization without families. Germany reported the alleged Islamic refugees are armed, not migrating as families fleeing as Christian converts.
In fact, Rose informed Americans on Facebook that Obama signed a Presidential Order to migrate millions of Muslims from Palestine into the USA, who alternate news reported are linked to or members of Hamas as well as from Syria. Obama requires the American people to pick up the tab for millions of unidentified and undocumented foreigner’s living expenses…..housing, food stamps, welfare, Drivers Licenses, education, Obamacare, and jobs. This agenda had the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Kerry, Reid, and the Democrats. This unconstitutional order will create an economic disaster for America’s taxpayers and create excessive taxation. Obama is burdening the American taxpayers and risking the safety and welfare of every American.
Rose Colombo begins her show with the Justice Club for 30 minutes – (if you’re short on time move the blue dial with your mouse to 30 minutes to being “Authors and Experts” Corner – Rose welcomes the Honorable Colonel (ret) John D.Vernon, U.S. Army, the author or “Angels Watching Over Me” who served the United States Military for over 37 years and retired at the rank of Colonel, a Department of Defense civilian and Township Supervisor. In 2012, he was prominent conservative candidate for the U.S. Senate in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He served in Viet Nam and survived serious attacks. He and his family reside in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Inside the cover of his page turning book, he shares his childhood, poverty, and his struggles that led him to the U.S. Army leading to a career in the U.S. Army and a myriad of prestigious Military awards. He shares his knowledge and perspective that question the direction the world is spinning and the downhill slide of the United States. He discusses how the nation is headed down the wrong path and how to stop it. The country’s rogue government begs the question if the American people can take back their country and fix it before it’s too late. (Follow Rose, Like, Comment and Bookmark!) All shows are Taped Live at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomizerradio or listen live MWF – 9am-10:30am pst – Archived Shows and Blogs can be accessed at Rose4Justice Blogs N Radio Shows at http://www.rose4justice.com – Click Below to listen:
Follow Rose on Facebook – Twitter@Rose4Justice- Rose Colombo, award-winning author, 5 Star self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured and recommended around the world; “Obamacare, Dinosaurs,Red Necks and Radicals,”5 Star Review, available on Amazon.com, Advocate for Justice, Researcher, Critical Thinker, Producer, Host, Writer of Cable TV Shows and Radio Shows: Women Fight Back; Issues of the Day; and Rose Colombo N The Justice Club
Archived Radio Shows and Blogs: www.rose4justice.com
Listen – Rose Colombo N The Justice Club: MWF, 9am-10:30am pst – 12-1:30p est -Worldwide Online, Podcasts, (347)324-3704 – Author’s Corner -Social and Political Injustices – Listen Live http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Are you concerned about your children and what they will be taught in the future in U.S. taxpayer funded public schools under the current regime? Rose Colombo and General Rick Knox welcome Attorney, Lauren Martel, who practices law in Houston Texas. She shares her expertise about Common Core. Americans need to know whose implementing “Common Core” to train up kids, not in the traditional American lifestyle that teaches reading, writing, and arithmetic, but provides for the federal government to think for the kids so eventually, they will be marching to the drum beat of the government instead of thinking for themselves. Will the government tell them who and who can’t go to college or who and who can’t be doctors, lawyers, politicians, and engineers? Will the government decide who will work at white collar jobs and who will work in blue collar jobs? Will the government become the parent? And, who is developing the computer program and writing the curriculum for Common Core? Taped Live for listening convenience.
Click the Link Below dated 11/15 and move the blue dial to 90 Minutes to listen to Constitutionally Speaking with special guest, Lauren Martel, Attorney at Law,discussing Common Core, the Federal Government coercing the public schools to take money to implement their program, alienating parental rights with Co-Hosts Rose Colombo, Dr. Rick and Cindy Knox……or listen to both shows.
RADIO: Constitutionally Speaking is now Rose Colombo N The Justice Club and air Live Worldwide Online every MWF – 9am – 10:30am pst and 1:30pm or 3:00 pm est – Rose’s special guests are experts and authors on every subject affecting today’s lives from the constitution to corruption, love, animals, health, food, education, Iran Deal and more. Listen live online, podcasts or at (347) 324-3704) – All shows archived at Freedomizer Radio or at Rose4Justice Blogs N Radio Shows at http://www.rose4justice.com
Follow Rose Colombo or Rose4Justice
Web & Contact www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Twitter: @Rose4Justice – Stumbleupon, Pinterest; Google +, Tumblr, Digg
Facebook Rose Colombo – Facebook/The Justice Club – Facebook/Constitutional Bar Association or LinkedIn/Rose Colombo – Rose’s books, Irwin Award Winner, Fight Back Legal Abuse, a self-help book for victims of legal abuse or “Obamacare, DInosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals” a political satire, 5 Star Reviews, can be viewed on paperback or e-book at amazon.com
written by Rose Colombo, original copyright pub. 12/21/2012
Wake Up, America! About 1989, on my talk radio show syndicated in Southern California on KIEV, KORG, KYMS, KGER, AND KWNK, I stated, “Wake Up, America! Wake up all you little sleepy heads out there!” And, I would ask, “Is America on the verge of the American dream or the American nightmare?” But, most people remained asleep to the corruption that was slowly creeping into our courts, government, schools, and churches. I’d ask my audience, “Are you awake now? The time is coming when you will witness the death of the U.S. Constitution shredded right before your very eyes.Of course, many listeners thought of the government topics as “conspiracy theories.” Well, all evil begins with a conspiracy theory and some people conspire before running as public servants; after all, we are our thoughts.
Shockingly, we are living in the year 2013 and the U.S. Congress is failing miserably as they violate their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution and perform their fiduciary duty, i.e., control the budget, read and make laws in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, which are fair, just, and equitable. Congress failed to Repeal, eliminate funding, and Nullify 923 draconian Executive Orders signed by Obama that deny constitutional rights and freedoms. In fact, the past and current U.S. Congress and Senators and all public servants even at the highest levels are ignoring and avoiding exercising their powers and refuse to ask a man, who was unvetted not once, not twice, but three times – 3X – “Who are you?” or “Where are your credentials?” They didn’t ask, “Why would you want to disarm Americans and arm anti-American nations?” Or, “Where was everyone before, during, and after Benghazi?” Obama stated that he’responsible for the final decisions as Commander-in-Chief whenever he spoke at press conferences. Remember, the news reported that final orders for military personnel must come from the White House before they can act. Its been stated that U.S. military officers must seek permission before taking action against the enemy or they could face punishment.
Well, here are the questions that Americans should be asking of their representatives before it’s too late!
Why does a unvetted senator or a unvetted (2x) US President, which is documented by news reports, believe that eliminating or circumventing or changing the 2nd Amendment for the purpose of disarming Americans is constitutionally allowed when the “Dick Act of 1902” prohibits the federal government, from denying Americans their right to bear arms? Let’s review the following actions relating to the Obama regime who sold untracked guns to untracked cartel members linked to terrorists using U.S. tax dollars diverted from the Recovery Act for jobs. This same regime sent U.S. tax dollars, weapons, and funding to anti-American nations and jobs and technology to Communist China who is demanding Americans disarm! Below are the questions:
1. Why did President Obama, according to Deputy AG Ogden, launch Fast and Furious and fund Fast and Furious with Recovery Funds promised for U.S. jobs with the express intent of selling untracked US guns to untracked criminals on foreign soil? In fact, untracked guns are still missing and in the hands of the untracked cartel members, but the Obama regime, with the approval of a silent congress proposes the disarming of law-abiding Americans, but for what purpose? Law-abiding Americans don’t kill children or innocent adults!
Did congress have knowledge of the $10,000,000 taken from the Recovery funds and diverted to a secret program so U.S. agents could sell untracked guns to untracked criminals in Mexico? And, if congress didn’t have knowledge of the $10,000,000 diverted from the Recovery Funds, Americans must ponder if congress relinquished their power to perform their fiduciary duty and control the purse strings as well as account for taxpayer dollars? And, who was responsible to track the $10,000,000 diverted from the Recovery Fund to implement Fast and Furious? Surely, someone is tracking the budget for each department.
After all, the only people, who ended up “unarmed” were the thousands of executed victims, who couldn’t defend themselves without guns between 2009 and 2011 after Fast and Furious was implemented. The Fast and Furious video of Deputy AG Ogden was seen on national news in April 2009. And, the fact is that there are thousands of untracked illegal guns with unknown locations and unknown owners making it impossible for the government to track thousands of untracked guns. Illegal guns are owned by untracked criminals,so the only people who will be disarmed and tracked are innocent law-abiding citizens owning legal guns. Also, criminals know how to make guns and ammunitions and they can buy them from communist nations and the Black Market.
2. Why did President Obama order 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya that killed unarmed innocent women, children, Gaddafi’s grandchildren and teenage son, as well as his son’s friends, and freedom fighters? The victims of the Libyan attack were defenseless. Why were the missiles fired off without congressional authority that killed unarmed people who hit national news including women and children. So, why doesn’t the NRA use the photos of all the children murdered in the Middle East with U.S. Tomahawk missiles against the push to take guns away from Americans.
Are people no more than “bumps in the road” or “collateral damage” if the means justifies their goal, but the same public servants exempt themselves from the same laws that they mandate for the peasants. Americans ponder how is it moral and ethical to deny due process of law to Americans while providing due process of law to radicals and illegals who kill Americans?
3. Why did President Obama send billions of US tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinians linked to Hamas to buy weapons and send Fighter Jets to the Middle East, after he helped install Muslim Brotherhood dictators into leadership positions? Didn’t such action render the freedom fighters and opposition to Sharia Law helpless. It appears that the freedom fighters weren’t supplied with arms, but the tyrants were supplied with arms.
4. Why does the US President have excessive numbers of armed body guards to protect himself and his family, but opposes the right of Americans to exercise their 236 year old right to bear arms as guaranteed by the US Constitution?
Why would the White House want Americans to remain defenseless against criminals who are armed if their lives are threatened by criminals? Guns are smuggled into the U.S. just like drugs. As I stated, guns are smuggled throughout the world in the Black market and sold to cartels around the world, so why would loyal American public servants want to render innocent law-abiding Americans helpless against criminals, terrorists, a tyrannical government, or a foreign enemy invasion, especially since police can’t arrive in time to save victims from armed criminals?
5. Why does the U.S. President and congress believe it’s the right of public servants to carry concealed weapons and defend themselves and their families and simultaneously support the UN small arms treaty that would disarm Americans? The 2nd Amendment and the Dick Act of 1902 prohibit the federal government from disarming Americans, yet they attempt to deny U.S. Constitutional rights. All public servants have sworn an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution. Law abiding Americans don’t kill children or adults unless a criminal threatens them. Senator Feinstein testified that she carries a concealed weapon and she will take out any criminal who threatens her or her husband!
6. Why would judges and lawyers be allowed to carry concealed weapons and hire armed body guards, but not the average Americans who aren’t employed by the federal government?
7. Why did the federal government purchase $1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and sniper bullets recently to be used against which people since ammunition is purchased to kill? In the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, the author write, “There is no justice, only decisions.”
Obviously, as history has proven, and it’s Eric Holder who referred to Obama – as dictator-like – that dictators throughout history, who disarmed the people and ordered them to lay down their guns eventually were ordered to lay down their lives, and genocide occurred every time, so how is this in the best interest of the American people? How is denying Americans their right to exercise the right to bear arms written in accordance with the will of the people or in accordance with the US Constitution or the Dick Act of 1902? It is not! For only the criminals, government, military (who must ask permission to shoot back at the enemy under the Obama regime according to news articles), will be armed, for once they deny and suspend constitutional rights, the dictators always come back to take away whatever rights remain including the Right-to-Life! Look at Communist China, Russia, Iraq, Cuba, Venezuela, Chile, Rwanda, Germany and Europe! Remember, the NDAA law? Did any U.S. Natural Born Citizen ever think they would see the day when the U.S. President, V.P., and Congress would target American Citizens to be possibly placed on a secret hit lists that could target them on domestic and foreign soil based on an accusation only and be considered legal, so how evil is that? Isn’t that the same as hiring hit men to kill innocent people who may be mistaken by the government or 100% innocent?
Rose says, “And, the dictators said, Come, march to my drum beat and I shall take care of you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me radiate your naked bodies for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me grope your bodies for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me teach your children how to behave for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me determine your value and worth for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come let me provide you work in the camp for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me tell you what you can or can’t eat and drink or what you can or can’t be or do, for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me mandate vaccines and Rx drugs for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me mandate abortions for it is in the best interest of certain sheeple! Come, let me disarm you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me track you and enslave you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, worship me, for it is in the best interest of the sheeple!
And, the sheeple did as they were told by public servants. They bowed to their new world leader. The sheeple didn’t ask questions nor did the congress who the sheeple entrusted to be men and women of integrity, but were not for they remained silent. The rest of the story is repeated in well-documented history books. Many sheeple have been slaughtered throughout history because they were disarmed by their leaders under the guise that it was for their protection. Other sheeple were disarmed. Afterwards, they were forced by the armed soldiers to drink the kool-aid against their will at gun point. They drank the kool-aid when Jim Jones and his armed guards surrounded them. They killed the sheeple and even a U.S. Congressman. The sheeple didn’t realize that they were defenseless against an armed fraud as their leader and armed criminals and they had awakened to the truth much too late! After he disarmed the people, they carried out a genocide against Americans. Then there is WACO, Ruby Ridge, OKC, Pentagon, and 911! (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Folllow – Twitter@Rose4Justice
website – http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Radio – The Justice Club follows C the Power – every Mon, Wed, Fri 11am (pdt) Freedomizer Radio
Radio – Constitutionally Speaking – every Friday 4:30 pm- 6pm (pdt-usa) -(347) 324-3701 – Freedomizer Radio
Books: 1)Irwin Award Winner, Fight Back Legal Abuse 2) Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals at amazon.com
Rose M. Colombo, award-winning writer, columnist, and author, publishes this article for educational purposes as a dissemination of information only, and it is not intended for political or legal advice.
by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder
Did Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?
In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about March 2012. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly. Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?
Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants; but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future. Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?
Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law. For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter? The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive. So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty? Also, the attacks on Libya, in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.
Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies? Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority? Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?
Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution. He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States
Rep. Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree. Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal basis.” He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”
Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act. He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.
Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.” He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you. If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.
Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.” Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis. Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here. We want to build an international support.
Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat. Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by Panetta’s statements.
Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.
So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress? Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution. It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.
In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?
The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitutionand Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175). It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it. They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere. For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion. I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another. I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.” In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.
Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers? How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends. How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place? At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.
Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation. How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution? For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder, without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price. If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?
Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or 2 men the right to knight themselves with absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen? Obama called the attack on Libya, a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?
In conclusion, if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country. If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern, it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.
Furthermore, if the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion? America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?
How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA? By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial? Even a guilty person should be given a trial! In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now. The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds. The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only. By the way, how is that even legal in America? It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws. Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages! Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Click the like button and leave a comment, please. You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit Disclaimer: Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/19/2011
We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009. Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members between 2009 – 2011. The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.
Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit” list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government? It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens. If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law? A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!
Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008: “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies. It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members. There are hundreds of missing guns!
Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.” Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money. The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.
How is it that the Obama czars, the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Homeland Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?
We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley. We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation. More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.
Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.
The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:
1. 1992: Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.
2. 2000: Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits. She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign. She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.
3. March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.
4. March 25, 2004: SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)
5. July 29, 2005: S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing
6. September 2005: Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune
7. 2006: Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]
8. 2008: New York Times: “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].
9. October 20, 2008: Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
10. March 13, 2009: Gun Ban List: HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.
11. L.A. Times 3/27/2009: “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”
Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”
“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”
12. March 2009: Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A. Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%]. They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.
13. March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.
14. May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.
15. August 14, 2009: CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1: “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”
16. August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2: Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.
17. June 28, 2010: The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”
18. July 20, 2010: The Examiner by Howard Portney read: “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”
Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest; or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?
19. May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.
20. June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’ Clinton said in an interview. “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
21. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.
22. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.
23. August 2010: Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights: She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.
24. August 2010: Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders: Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts. She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.
25. September 2, 2010: Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics. [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]
26. January 8, 2011: Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents. Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.
27. Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury. He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.
28. January 8, 2011: LiteNews.com – U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life. Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush. He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner. Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency. The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll. Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.
29. February 23, 2011 Letter: Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”
30. February 2011 Letter posted on-line: Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico. “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”
31. June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein: “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations. This administration routinely ignores subpoenas. The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.” .
32. May 23, 2011: CNN seen on You Tube video: Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks. [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)
33. 2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.
On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America. On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body. On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki. Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?” These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.
In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date, as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens. The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future. **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).
The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review. Read Reviews andcomplimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings? Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government. Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money? After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement? Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if, Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?
Cut the Spending! Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama! He is the Print and Spend President. Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010! Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?
One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more! And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans! I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.
So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund. If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money. Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!
Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.
In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month. The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care. Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.
In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama! No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth. The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years. The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China. Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs. It’s small businesses that create more jobs. Instead, Obama created more government jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.
Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government? Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes. Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients. Social security is money earned, not welfare. Not only is Obama’s threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living. So, one must wonder if Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?
Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate. Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress. In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund. Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks, was deposited into a “Trust” Account.
Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property? How is diverting the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens considered ethical? How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff. Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.
Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable. In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected. Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.
So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?
In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama. Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA. China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?
About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. . On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters. Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.
Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars. Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk. Obama fired off 221 tomahawks – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people. Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news. He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.
Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt. For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953. Think about that!
How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president. In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008. Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.
But, Obama made history. Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion! He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.
Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder. Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?
Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.
Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt? China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.
The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work. The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A. Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations. He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A. Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.
In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078. Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years. By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615. In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion. But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.
But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion! Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there. He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher. So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?
2011: U.S. Population = 311, 756,198 (2008 = 304,421,946)
2011: U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291 (2008 = 108,228,953)
2011: Official Unemployed = 14,055,369 (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)
2011: Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)
2011: State Local Employees = 15, 892,215
2011: Federal Employees = 4,305,706
2011: U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347
2011: U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)
2011: U.S. Families = 82,102,337 (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]
2011: Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907 (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]
2011: Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470
2011: Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799
2011: Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising
2011: Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising
2011: Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising
2011: Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138
2011: Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]
2011: Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)
2011: Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising
2011: Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising – a substantial decrease as of 2011)
2011: Assets Per Citizen = $242,722 (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))
2011: U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]
2011: Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)
2011: Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281
2011: Total Debt Per Family = $669,109
2011: Savings Per Family = $6,953 [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]
2011: U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit: $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *
2011: National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503
2011: National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747
2011: Income Tax: $946,651,562,999 and rising *
2011: Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising
2011: Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]
2011: U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)
I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans. Another example of waste is the multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs. But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second
Note: The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!
Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!
(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt). Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas. You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com
Rose Colombo, original (c) 3/22/2011, rev. 9/18/2013
Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution says Congress shall have the power to ……DECLARE WAR.,” not the President. How then shall we decide if the Constitution is respected as the law of the land or even acknowledged by President Obama or congress? Shall we assume that Congress is looking the other way and dismissing the Rule of Law as a mere charter of negative laws or liberties that no longer need to be followed, but ignored or changed?
Consequently, such negligent behaviors by congress begs the question: Is congress holding themselves above the laws of the land by ignoring Obama’s one man decision to declare war without presenting his case to congress? How then does Obama have the authority to spend billions of dollars on a war without the approval of congress? It appears that congress is fearful of calling for an investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, HHS, AP, and NSA, NDAA, Patriot Act, which are U.S. scandals and possibly crimes recurring from within the federal government without oversight which can lead to Obstruction of Justice.
Therefore, We The People must ask if Obama is following the decisions set down by the U.N. versus the laws established by the constitution of the United States. Obama stated several times that the US Constitution and US Congress are “meaningless?” Perhaps, they were “meaningless” to him when he swore an oath to uphold, defend, and protect the U.S. Constitution, twice, with his hand on the “red” book. The fact that Obama in my opinion violated the US Constitution and by-passed and ignored congress when he ordered the military to fire off 220 Tomahawk missiles at Libya and wasn’t held accountable for what appeared to most Americans as an “act of war” against a nation who never threatened to attack the United States of America.
And, let’s not forget that famous interview of Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State, who laughed hysterically when asked about the assassination of Gadaffi. On national television, Gadaffi referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and congratulated a Kenyan for winning the election as President of the USA which shocked the entire Middle East and Kenya’s family, Parliament, and citizens.
Click the Link posted as information for educational and entertainment purposes only: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb_N02-vh8M – Hillary Clinton laughs during interview about Gadaffi assassination
Therefore, how is it that congress failed to call for an investigation into Obama’s failure to follow the Rule of Law since America is a Republic that operates by the Rule of Law? Should we fear asking if America is still a Republic versus what many believe is a Corporation owned by the Rothschild bankers. Otherwise; how should We The People know how congress can justify ignoring Obama’s trampling on the laws of the land as if they have relinquished their powers and granted absolute power to a non-vetted admitted Kenyan in a free nation?
It would appear that the majority of Americans should be outraged that a U.S. President would fire missiles at a nation who didn’t attack the USA. It is not important for all Americans to know where the loyalties of every U.S. President and the U.S. Congressional member lie during this volatile time in world history with knowledge that the wealthy elite are determined to create a global world and seek to depopulate the world by 90% by the year 2050? I guess firing off 220 Tomahawk Missiles would do the trick over time.
How is it that Americans are calling the congressional representatives with outrage and asking how much money Obama and Hillary Clinton spent on the attack against Libya that put their nation in disarray where blood was shed. It appears that Obama and congress are spending a lot less money and are a lot less concerned about fixing the economy or creating jobs versus their efforts that are destroying the U.S. economic status and reducing America’s credit rating for the first time in 240 years. It appears that they are more concerned about destroying jobs through outsourcing and using U.S. tax dollars against the will of the legal American citizens as they unconstitutionally spy on innocent Americans. They are using U.S. tax dollars it appears to supply weapons and funding to train up anti-American and anti-Christian and anti-Jew organizations and rebels.
Remember, “The 1787 Adoption of the Constitution” gave congress the power to raise and support armies,” “Provide and maintain a Navy,” and “to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and Naval forces, as well as to “declare war” as well as granted the President of the United States the responsibility of being the military’s Commander In Chief. The title, Commander-in-Chief is separate and apart from Obama declaring himself a one-man decision maker to declare war without congressional authority then have the congress diminish it as a non-war.
Furthermore, Americans should be asking if Obama violated the U.S. Constitution when he took it upon himself without the approval of Congress to sit as the Acting Chair of the U.N., while he is a sitting President of the United States? The U.S. Congress prohibits such behavior, but he appears to be able to do whatever he decides to do and it appears he has been granted special privileges. Is Obama held above constitutional law and without accountability?
How then do these issues not raise eyebrows so that Americans can determine if the U.S. President as well as the U.S. Congress have misdirected their loyalty and are leaning towards protecting foreign anti-American nations and not so much legal Americans? It appears the U.N. s overstepped their power when the federal government allowed the United Nations to trample upon America and the American people as the United Nations without any authority of the USA continues to overstep their bounds and demand Americans give up their weapons and children, or redistribute America’s wealth to them, depopulate future natural-born citizens, and give up U.S. Liberties to them.
During a senatorial investigation, former Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated to Chair, Jeff Sessions, that “we” – assuming Panetta and Obama, the Commander-in-Chief, would not seek permission for their agendas from Congress in the future, but would seek permission from international bodies, and may or may not inform Congress. How is that not impeachable offenses? In other words, their loyalty no longer lies with the Constitution and Congress, but with foreign international bodies, which should have caused outrage by Americans, but did not.
Obama and Hillary Clinton and their Democratic Regime appear to have gone rogue and appear to have been working with the Deep State and Shadow Governments which would include DHS-Fema and The Clinton Foundation and CFR, U.N. and NWO in my opinion. They allowed the Muslim Brotherhood, to frequent the White House in secret meetings with Obama without the press present and tour the White House. The stated and written strategic goal of the Muslim Brotherhood is to wipe out America, Europe, and Israel – all of Western Civilization.
How is it that President Obama determined that he has the power to declare war against Libya without presenting his case to Congress who are supposed to represent We The People? The Congress is the only body established by the U.S. Constitution that can declare war with just cause. The Congress is responsible for U.S. tax dollars being spent wisely, yet, they wasted about $600,000 per Tomahawk Missile fired off at Libya for a total of 220. Multiple $600,000.00 x 220 and that’s what the taxpayers lost and that doesn’t include the loss of life and property in Libya. It appears that the White House and Congress spend the taxpayer’s money as if it’s theirs to do whatever they choose and ignore their responsibility to the American taxpayers. This writer read that by 2016, the Tomahawk Missiles would be reduced down substantially because of Obama’s war on Libya which could mean he left America vulnerable.
The American people compensate the Presidents of the United States with jobs and taxpayer-funded wages, but within that election process lies a fiduciary duty and expectation of all public servants. The belief of a sworn oath by We The People includes the belief that the elected public servants will uphold morality, honesty, integrity, common sense, and loyalty to the USA and in exchange for their sworn oaths, they are required to uphold the Rule of Law as established within the U.S. Constitution. The President is required to uphold his sworn oath as Commander-in-Chief and protect the safety and welfare of our U.S. military, not intentionally send the U.S. Navy Seals and Military into harm’s way to be slaughtered like sheep.
It appears to this writer that congress failed to protect the U.S. Military with all the Obama dictatorial orders that tied the hands of the military men and women which got many killed and dishonorably discharged or jailed! Obama said, “America will never be at war with America” which meant in my opinion, he was protecting them, not us. If America wasn’t at war with Islam then why were the troops sent to the Middle East to be injured or die on their soil? This was the fault of the corrupted DNC and Democratic Socialist Liberal Congress and the Rinos as many became wealthy even though they are on taxpayer-funded wages.
The sworn oath doesn’t grant authority to exempt any US President or Congressional member from the law or grant them the authority to hold themselves above the law.The Congress and Obama decided they would hold themselves above the law it does appear. In fact, lawmakers are to be held to a higher standard of the law. The sworn oath doesn’t grant authority to a U.S. President to rule by abuse of power and without objection by Congress. The Constitution doesn’t grant a President of the USA to by-pass congress and the constitution by declaring the constitution and congress “meaningless” and state he will rule by Executive Order because he has a pen and a phone. The Congress failed in their fiduciary duty to read laws and failed to nullify laws that were unconstitutional, illegal, and unlawful.
The truth is that every elected U.S. President and each member of congress has a fiduciary duty to read in-depth and study in-depth each law before they approve it and assure the American people each law is just, fair, equitable, economically sound, moral, and of good common sense. They failed to do that between 1992-2016.
Therefore, how is it that Americans would not unite and protest any U.S. President or Congressional members to say, “Well, it doesn’t matter that Obama didn’t seek permission from Congress before ordering the military to fire off 220 Tomahawk missiles without approval against a leader and nation that never threatened the USA. Obama’s rogue decisions eliminated Checks and Balances as he ruled by Executive Order only. Wars create homelessness, poverty, orphans, injured bodies, death and destruction, loss of jobs and income, and contaminated water and food, as well as disease. Think about it!
The U.S. Constitution declares that Congress controls the purse strings, not the U.S. President, but Congress handed over the purse strings of the people’s tax dollars to president Obama in 2009. Americans are concerned about their welfare and safety since the majority of congressional members are rolling over like lap dogs and complicit to whatever president Obama decides. Are they afraid to speak out and if so then they should resign for they appear to care less that the economic status of the USA is sinking without recovery in sight.
Since the age of Obama and the Clinton’s taking office in 2009, it appears that the Democratic Congress doesn’t even bother to investigate or question the migration of unidentified foreigners in the tens of thousands into the USA from foreign terrorist nations? How is it they were okay with Obama and Hillary, Ogden, and Holder trafficking and selling guns on foreign soil in Mexico to unidentified cartel members who murdered innocent people for two years between 2009 and 2011 on both sides of the borders after the President of Mexico met with Holder and Hillary Clinton complaining the guns were coming into Mexico from the USA?
In my opinion, the American Citizens should be wearing their red, white, and blue sandals and walking like the Egyptians. Americans should ask how is it that a U.S. President is informed of a BP oil spill in the gulf of Mexico and he does absolutely nothing for two months to prevent its spill into the gulf that kills off the ocean life and fishing industry affecting the food industry in Mexico and the USA? And, what happened to the billions paid to the Obama Regime for the oil leak by BP Oil?
Congress is compensated with taxpayer-funded wages and jobs in exchange for their promises and sworn oath that mandates they uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution of the USA and the welfare and safety of the American citizens, but the Democratic Socialist Liberal and Rino Congress have failed Americans greatly. They cared less about vetting a U.S. President and cared less that he altered a Certificate of Live Birth and a U.S. Birth Certificate throughout the entire federal government which is absolute unprecedented and stunning in the greatest nation in the world. The only explanation is that America is facing enemies from within not just from without.
You’re invited to read free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s 2 books, the first is an award winner and self-help compilation of stories, information, and provocative questions, entitled , “Fight Back Legal abuse,” and her latest satire with humorous characters and a fictional Orwellian adventure story that leaves the readers with a provoking question at the end of Rose Colombo’s book entitled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” available at www.amazon.com