Taped Live – Susan Moss, Best Selling Author, “Survive Cancer” and “Keep Your Breasts” speaks out on surviving cancer, self-healing, and a program on self-help. Susan is a cancer survivor. Her artwork is exhibited in galleries around the world. Move the dial to 120 minutes for the Justice Club with host and author, Rose Colombo or listen to all 3 shows on health injustices, nutrition, foods.
Two Victims and Crusaders of what ABC news Vegas calls a toxic poison Rx Drug, are my guests on THE JUSTICE CLUB and ignored by the Congress and Senate with more than 5,000 complaints and more than 12,000 victims around the nation whose health deteriorated after being injected by their doctors. Karin Klein is taking her case to the U.S. Supreme Court and she’s seeking help writing Amicus Briefs and letters and the deadline date for filing is November 27, 2013. Click on the Link below to listen and share with your family and friends. Don’t be the next victim! TLRoars / CthePower / Justice Club 11/08 by FreedomizerRadio | Current Events Podcasts.
FRIDAY 11/8/2013 – ALAN KEYES!!!! Tune in at 4:30p-6p(pdt) or 7:30p-9p (est) for CONSTITUTIONALLY SPEAKING, Friday, 11/8/2013, Special Guest Alan Keyes, political conservative activist who earned his Doctorate at Harvard in Government Affairs. Listen online or ipods on Freedomizer Radio at blogtalkradio – – Join us and comment and listen at (347) 324-3704Follow Rose Colombo or Rose4Justice
LISTEN TAPED LIVE: Rose Colombo welcomes,Dr. Alan Keyes, as her special guest as the producer and host of “The Justice Club” at Freedomizer Radio. Dr. ALAN KEYES,graciouslyshares his knowledge and insight about Obama and the ObamaNation. Dr. Keyes is anAmerican Conservative Political Activist, author, former Diplomat, and perennial candidate for office. A doctoral graduate of Harvard University, Dr. Keyes began his diplomatic career in the United States. He received a Doctorate in Government Affairs from Harvard University before joining the Reagan administration. He’s married and he has 3 children and lives in Long Island, New York.
SORRY – THIS SHOW IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE – GO TO COLOMBO CHRONICLES LIVE – Most shows archived with experts and authors from around the world and choose your favorite author, expert, and topic and listen at your convenience. LISTEN LIVE every Wednesday, 12 noon to 1:00 p.m. pst-USA by phone (646) 564-9742 or Listen Live on worldwide internet athttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles
Books: Award-Winning Books and 5 Star Reviews: “Fight Back Legal Abuse”
CHRISTMAS BOOK FOR ANY AGE: Award-winning political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Rednecks & Radicals, political satire and Orwellian fictional adventure story on the Redistribution of Wealth and Depopulation….Check it out and order your gift at –http://www.amazon.com
America, the Super Power! Really? If America is a Super Power and We The People have so much power than why are 300,000,000 Americans rolling over and allowing around 535 men and women elected into the Oval Office and Congress mandate that the Middle Class Americans pay for their own demise and the demise of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens under the unconstitutional and immoral Obamacare by killing future U.S.Natural Born citizens with abortion scissors at birth? Why are the proud Americans not resisting the rationing and denying of health care services by selective federal government choice and possibly euthanizing grandma and grandpa, baby boomers, seniors, the elderly, and veterans, the sick, cancer patients, and disabled using U.S. tax dollars for death care, while they exempt themselves from these same death panels?
How is it if We The People elect these public servants to uphold the “sanctity of life” and the “right to life” that they are only concerned about their sanctity of life and their right-to-life, but not yours? Hitler wasn’t concerned and look how things turned out for millions of people who were complicit and didn’t resist evil agendas.
How is it that the American people just roll over and say, “Well, I guess that it’s the law when they know that Obamacare is not in their best interest, safety or welfare, and definitely is known by all that it’s not economically sound. Obamacare discriminates and protects the President and his family, the Congress and their families, the U.S.Justices and their families, SEIU unions, Muslims, and illegals, but not the U.S. Natural Born and Legal generational loyal Naturalized Americans who make up the Middle Class. It’s the Middle Class who pay the taxpayer funded wages of public servants who are not looking out for the Citizens of the USA or their welfare, safety, or health, but only theirs by exempting themselves from their own unread, but approved Obamacare mandates. They are holding themselves above the law of death panels, euthanasia, and taxpayer funded mandated abortions, excessive penalties, intrusive invasion of privacy, and excessive punishment, which violates U.S.constitutional law, which they swore to uphold, but not!
Wasn’t it Hitler who carried out agendas under the guise of health care and for the benefit of the people and implemented selective mandated abortions? President Reagan warned Americans against mandated abortions and infanticide? So, roll over and be complicit because around 535 people are responsible for pushing their evil agenda during 2008 and again in 2012, but We The People are responsible for allowing public servants to force Americans to pay for their own demise and the demise of the unborn future U.S. Natural Born Citizens. We The People are responsible for allowing public servants to force rationed and denied health care services on Americans only while exempting Muslims and the Muslim Brotherhood, and themselves. Don’t be fooled, Obama signing up was only symbolic and Congress added taxpayer funded subsidies for their health care benefits. This is happening because We The People haven’t peacefully Resisted and Impeached and Recalled and Arrested the guilty, while they arrest the poor, homeless and the hungry.
It all began in 1998 when Americans chanted, “Yes we can,” but never bothered to ask,”Yes, we can do what?” A quiet silent civilized genocide – is it or not – between the haves and the have nots? The weak vs. the strong? Evil vs. good? Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country!
Note: After Rose Colombo published this particular Blog suggesting people do not comply with unconstitutional laws that cause pain and suffering for loyal Americans, there are blog sites that popped up which people can join and peacefully resist against unconstitutional laws that threaten or harm the health, safety, and welfare of every unborn and born loyal American and she suggests that every American join those groups and unite.
Donations are welcome if you appreciate this information and feel its invaluable to the public as well as the radio shows which take time, knowledge, effort, skills, and money to produce. Donations would be appreciated and helpful in order to continue producing additional self-help information with the hope of helping people feel empowered so they know that they aren’t alone. Donations will also help complete future projects which include self-help books, DVD’s, CD’s, and workshops and seminars. If not, please enjoy the information and share it with your friends. If anyone sends a $25 donation or more to support The Justice Club, I will send you my 10 top tips on How To Protect Yourself From your Own Attorney.
Please mark your check DONATION at the bottom and Mail to:
P.O. Box 7784
Huntington Beach, California 92615
http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Follow Rose on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice – Order her award winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse – and- “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at amazon.com (Please share, but please do not plagiarize)
Award-Winning Self-Help Book – “Fight Back Legal Abuse” recommended by lawyers, national talk show hosts, newspapers and magazines around the world – http://www.amazon.com
“Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks, and Radicals” – political satire – complimentary pages and 5 Star Reviews can be read at www.amazon.com
written by Rose Colombo, original copyright pub. 12/21/2012
Wake Up, America! About 1989, on my talk radio show syndicated in Southern California on KIEV, KORG, KYMS, KGER, AND KWNK, I stated, “Wake Up, America! Wake up all you little sleepy heads out there!” And, I would ask, “Is America on the verge of the American dream or the American nightmare?” But, most people remained asleep to the corruption that was slowly creeping into our courts, government, schools, and churches. I’d ask my audience, “Are you awake now? The time is coming when you will witness the death of the U.S. Constitution shredded right before your very eyes.Of course, many listeners thought of the government topics as “conspiracy theories.” Well, all evil begins with a conspiracy theory and some people conspire before running as public servants; after all, we are our thoughts.
Shockingly, we are living in the year 2013 and the U.S. Congress is failing miserably as they violate their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution and perform their fiduciary duty, i.e., control the budget, read and make laws in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, which are fair, just, and equitable. Congress failed to Repeal, eliminate funding, and Nullify 923 draconian Executive Orders signed by Obama that deny constitutional rights and freedoms. In fact, the past and current U.S. Congress and Senators and all public servants even at the highest levels are ignoring and avoiding exercising their powers and refuse to ask a man, who was unvetted not once, not twice, but three times – 3X – “Who are you?” or “Where are your credentials?” They didn’t ask, “Why would you want to disarm Americans and arm anti-American nations?” Or, “Where was everyone before, during, and after Benghazi?” Obama stated that he’responsible for the final decisions as Commander-in-Chief whenever he spoke at press conferences. Remember, the news reported that final orders for military personnel must come from the White House before they can act. Its been stated that U.S. military officers must seek permission before taking action against the enemy or they could face punishment.
Well, here are the questions that Americans should be asking of their representatives before it’s too late!
Why does a unvetted senator or a unvetted (2x) US President, which is documented by news reports, believe that eliminating or circumventing or changing the 2nd Amendment for the purpose of disarming Americans is constitutionally allowed when the “Dick Act of 1902” prohibits the federal government, from denying Americans their right to bear arms? Let’s review the following actions relating to the Obama regime who sold untracked guns to untracked cartel members linked to terrorists using U.S. tax dollars diverted from the Recovery Act for jobs. This same regime sent U.S. tax dollars, weapons, and funding to anti-American nations and jobs and technology to Communist China who is demanding Americans disarm! Below are the questions:
1. Why did President Obama, according to Deputy AG Ogden, launch Fast and Furious and fund Fast and Furious with Recovery Funds promised for U.S. jobs with the express intent of selling untracked US guns to untracked criminals on foreign soil? In fact, untracked guns are still missing and in the hands of the untracked cartel members, but the Obama regime, with the approval of a silent congress proposes the disarming of law-abiding Americans, but for what purpose? Law-abiding Americans don’t kill children or innocent adults!
Did congress have knowledge of the $10,000,000 taken from the Recovery funds and diverted to a secret program so U.S. agents could sell untracked guns to untracked criminals in Mexico? And, if congress didn’t have knowledge of the $10,000,000 diverted from the Recovery Funds, Americans must ponder if congress relinquished their power to perform their fiduciary duty and control the purse strings as well as account for taxpayer dollars? And, who was responsible to track the $10,000,000 diverted from the Recovery Fund to implement Fast and Furious? Surely, someone is tracking the budget for each department.
After all, the only people, who ended up “unarmed” were the thousands of executed victims, who couldn’t defend themselves without guns between 2009 and 2011 after Fast and Furious was implemented. The Fast and Furious video of Deputy AG Ogden was seen on national news in April 2009. And, the fact is that there are thousands of untracked illegal guns with unknown locations and unknown owners making it impossible for the government to track thousands of untracked guns. Illegal guns are owned by untracked criminals,so the only people who will be disarmed and tracked are innocent law-abiding citizens owning legal guns. Also, criminals know how to make guns and ammunitions and they can buy them from communist nations and the Black Market.
2. Why did President Obama order 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya that killed unarmed innocent women, children, Gaddafi’s grandchildren and teenage son, as well as his son’s friends, and freedom fighters? The victims of the Libyan attack were defenseless. Why were the missiles fired off without congressional authority that killed unarmed people who hit national news including women and children. So, why doesn’t the NRA use the photos of all the children murdered in the Middle East with U.S. Tomahawk missiles against the push to take guns away from Americans.
Are people no more than “bumps in the road” or “collateral damage” if the means justifies their goal, but the same public servants exempt themselves from the same laws that they mandate for the peasants. Americans ponder how is it moral and ethical to deny due process of law to Americans while providing due process of law to radicals and illegals who kill Americans?
3. Why did President Obama send billions of US tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinians linked to Hamas to buy weapons and send Fighter Jets to the Middle East, after he helped install Muslim Brotherhood dictators into leadership positions? Didn’t such action render the freedom fighters and opposition to Sharia Law helpless. It appears that the freedom fighters weren’t supplied with arms, but the tyrants were supplied with arms.
4. Why does the US President have excessive numbers of armed body guards to protect himself and his family, but opposes the right of Americans to exercise their 236 year old right to bear arms as guaranteed by the US Constitution?
Why would the White House want Americans to remain defenseless against criminals who are armed if their lives are threatened by criminals? Guns are smuggled into the U.S. just like drugs. As I stated, guns are smuggled throughout the world in the Black market and sold to cartels around the world, so why would loyal American public servants want to render innocent law-abiding Americans helpless against criminals, terrorists, a tyrannical government, or a foreign enemy invasion, especially since police can’t arrive in time to save victims from armed criminals?
5. Why does the U.S. President and congress believe it’s the right of public servants to carry concealed weapons and defend themselves and their families and simultaneously support the UN small arms treaty that would disarm Americans? The 2nd Amendment and the Dick Act of 1902 prohibit the federal government from disarming Americans, yet they attempt to deny U.S. Constitutional rights. All public servants have sworn an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution. Law abiding Americans don’t kill children or adults unless a criminal threatens them. Senator Feinstein testified that she carries a concealed weapon and she will take out any criminal who threatens her or her husband!
6. Why would judges and lawyers be allowed to carry concealed weapons and hire armed body guards, but not the average Americans who aren’t employed by the federal government?
7. Why did the federal government purchase $1.6 billion rounds of ammunition and sniper bullets recently to be used against which people since ammunition is purchased to kill? In the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, the author write, “There is no justice, only decisions.”
Obviously, as history has proven, and it’s Eric Holder who referred to Obama – as dictator-like – that dictators throughout history, who disarmed the people and ordered them to lay down their guns eventually were ordered to lay down their lives, and genocide occurred every time, so how is this in the best interest of the American people? How is denying Americans their right to exercise the right to bear arms written in accordance with the will of the people or in accordance with the US Constitution or the Dick Act of 1902? It is not! For only the criminals, government, military (who must ask permission to shoot back at the enemy under the Obama regime according to news articles), will be armed, for once they deny and suspend constitutional rights, the dictators always come back to take away whatever rights remain including the Right-to-Life! Look at Communist China, Russia, Iraq, Cuba, Venezuela, Chile, Rwanda, Germany and Europe! Remember, the NDAA law? Did any U.S. Natural Born Citizen ever think they would see the day when the U.S. President, V.P., and Congress would target American Citizens to be possibly placed on a secret hit lists that could target them on domestic and foreign soil based on an accusation only and be considered legal, so how evil is that? Isn’t that the same as hiring hit men to kill innocent people who may be mistaken by the government or 100% innocent?
Rose says, “And, the dictators said, Come, march to my drum beat and I shall take care of you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me radiate your naked bodies for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me grope your bodies for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me teach your children how to behave for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me determine your value and worth for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come let me provide you work in the camp for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me tell you what you can or can’t eat and drink or what you can or can’t be or do, for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me mandate vaccines and Rx drugs for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me mandate abortions for it is in the best interest of certain sheeple! Come, let me disarm you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, let me track you and enslave you for it is in the best interest of the sheeple! Come, worship me, for it is in the best interest of the sheeple!
And, the sheeple did as they were told by public servants. They bowed to their new world leader. The sheeple didn’t ask questions nor did the congress who the sheeple entrusted to be men and women of integrity, but were not for they remained silent. The rest of the story is repeated in well-documented history books. Many sheeple have been slaughtered throughout history because they were disarmed by their leaders under the guise that it was for their protection. Other sheeple were disarmed. Afterwards, they were forced by the armed soldiers to drink the kool-aid against their will at gun point. They drank the kool-aid when Jim Jones and his armed guards surrounded them. They killed the sheeple and even a U.S. Congressman. The sheeple didn’t realize that they were defenseless against an armed fraud as their leader and armed criminals and they had awakened to the truth much too late! After he disarmed the people, they carried out a genocide against Americans. Then there is WACO, Ruby Ridge, OKC, Pentagon, and 911! (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Folllow – Twitter@Rose4Justice
website – http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Radio – The Justice Club follows C the Power – every Mon, Wed, Fri 11am (pdt) Freedomizer Radio
Radio – Constitutionally Speaking – every Friday 4:30 pm- 6pm (pdt-usa) -(347) 324-3701 – Freedomizer Radio
Books: 1)Irwin Award Winner, Fight Back Legal Abuse 2) Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals at amazon.com
Rose M. Colombo, award-winning writer, columnist, and author, publishes this article for educational purposes as a dissemination of information only, and it is not intended for political or legal advice.
“All the most horrible and disgusting aspects of the last decades of the twentieth century-the pornography, the sadism, the violence, the moral and spiritual vacuum-were already evidence there.” (Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation – Ronald Reagan 1983)
The majority of lawmakers, who have knowledge that senator Obama aka U.S. President Obama, isn’t properly vetted. The Democrats and Rinos allege that there isn’t a true definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but aren’t telling the truth, so they must have something to hide. In fact, the lawmakers who allege that the vetting laws aren’t a requirement to be a U.S. President sold that bottle of snake oil to 51% of the brainwashed zombies in America and reeks of misrepresentation. Of course, vetting means identifying every person in the USA, especially a U.S. President, a requirement under federal and state Identification laws. An unidentified person can’t lawfully work or hold public office or be paid by the taxpayers, let alone access National Security or even walk into the gates towards the White House. Is the entire Federal Government declaring that anyone can be a U.S. president without producing their certified Identification records, background checks, or produce any credentials? This is a very dangerous path for America.
All credentials are required to be vetted by the government and made transparent for public review including criminal background checks, Passports, Alias Names, Former Addresses, school records, College Degrees, Selective Service Records, Birth Certificates, Student Loans, Driver’s License, Law License, and Tax Returns. On the other hand, it appears that if a legal Americans applies to be a janitor at the White House, he must be fingerprinted, and meet all the identification requirements and background checks as an employee of the government, but not to be a U.S. President in 2008-2009? Remember, the Certification of a U.S. President requires Proper Vetting and Proof that the candidate is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. In fact, all jobs in the USA require proper identification. In the case of Obama, the lawsuits filed and investigations by law enforcement, names Sheriff Arpaio and Detective Zullo and forensic experts, allege that the U.S. Certificate of Live Birth and U.S. Birth Certificate Obama posted online and he and Michelle Obama stated on the Oprah show were legal U.S. government documents makes every natural-born American appear as if he and his colleagues do believe Americans are “stupid” and “foolish” and “easily tricked.”
The controversy over the Obama Birth Certificates is ignored by the DOJ and by the White House and by the Congress. They cared less including the Supreme Court and the Federal Judges. They left the eligibility of Barry Soetoro who stated he was born in Kenya to an audience and wrote and published it in a bio blowing in the wind. If the candidate wasn’t vetted properly then how can the Secretary of State and Speaker Nancy Pelosi sign the Certification for a non-vetted U.S. president? In fact, it’s rumored that Speaker Pelosi altered the wording on the Certification for U.S. President before signing off on Obama’s Certification of being a natural-born American. Why would they do that? Upon lawmakers having knowledge that a public servant isn’t properly vetted, it’s the duty of the lawmakers and law enforcers to properly vet the person, but if they fail to vet with such knowledge, they are willingly, consenting, and in agreement ignoring the vetting policies and identification laws required by federal employment laws, immigration laws, and Article II.
The President, Barack Hussein Obama, who isn’t vetted properly, remains a mystery to Americans, because he hasn’t been required to follow the Rule of Law or uphold Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution (to the best of my knowledge) and produce a certified U.S. Birth Certificate. Obama has been admitted into the oval office for a second term even though two television stations shockingly reported his winning percentages on national television before the elections were held. And, it just so happened coincidentally that alternative news reported that Mr.Hagel owned electronic voting machine companies (now elevated to Secretary of Defense) and the federal government has documented testimony and reports that electronic voting machines can be rigged. During his speech on November 6, 2012, Obama said something quite shocking. He said, We, the American people – will “rise and fall together.” His statement made me say, “Ouch! Should we do as the Romans, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, or learn from the history books?” (refer to the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse at amazon.com).
Should we, as Americans, inquire into the question if America is on the road to heaven or the road to hell? For example, the immoral and inappropriate television shows produced for children influence young minds negatively. The violent video games encouraging violence can cause some kids to believe this is normal. The teaching that suicide and death is good may cause some kids to follow through and try it. The promotion of euthanasia for the sick and elderly under ObamaCare should be a frightening and immoral law to Americans. Mandated Abortions worldwide promoted by Obama’s Executive Orders for the poor and U.S. Natural Born Citizens as women’s rights. Mandated Taxpayer Funded Abortions is immoral and reduces the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens as well as natural born of Third World Nations such as Kenya requiring Americans to pick up the tab worldwide to slaughter future unborn babies. The push to eliminate heterosexual lifestyles and traditional marriage under the Obama regime is a serious problem for Americans and is an attack on the foundation of a civilized nation. The disrespect for the sick and the elderly, the veterans, and the military, whose benefits are being placed at risk under Obama’s regime will cause hardship. All these issues are signs of a nation being taken into a very dark place as history has proven repeatedly. The attack on Christians, Catholics, and Jews is a very serious problem for America, Israel and Western Civilization as well as Muslims who convert, Coptic Christians, Jews, and Christians.. Only those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and lips to speak the truth, shall not be blinded by this unseen web of evil reptilian deceit that has been woven around the United States of America. How then shall we break out or is it too late? (refer to the political satire, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals at amazon.com).
In my humble opinion, I don’t believe that Americans listen closely to Obama’s words. His words have meanings, but his supporters are too busy cheering for a free phone or free cash or cars for clunkers to pay attention to what he said. Was he referring to the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire during his second term speech that should have sent chills down the spine of every loyal red, white, and blue American when he spoke those words? Is his true vision of America and that of his alleged foreign-born Kenyan father based on their belief that America is oppressive and Americans are spoiled and “revenge” is the goal? This should raise the question if his stated goal to fulfill the dreams of his real father and his own dreams, as well as his radical mentors, a part of the redistribution of America’s wealth to himself, cronies, banksters, and the Middle East in the amount of $16 Trillion, which future generations, must pay back? And, the news reported a recent lawsuit filed by a prominent law firm against public servants in positions of power who are named in an alleged $43 Trillion money laundering scandal involving America’s tax funded Tarp program.
Furthermore, Obama said we are all in this together, the illegals, and the Black slaves, but Thomas Jefferson must be rolling over in his grave, because Jefferson didn’t treat the Blacks inhumanely, who were working and living on his plantation as slaves, but he treated them as human beings. But, Obama on one hand wants to provide entitlements to illegals at taxpayer’s expense in exchange for votes, and on the other hand, possibly arrest American business owners who hire illegals even though business owners aren’t trained law enforcement agents.
Therefore, Abraham Lincoln, who adamantly opposed slavery, abolished it during the civil war. Thomas Jefferson housed, fed and clothed 600 Black slaves in their separate cabins on his estate and he taught them to read, as one of the requirements when working on his plantation. These two Founding Fathers must be rolling over in their graves since slavery and illegal immigration are violations of the federal laws and the Rule of Law and slavery has been prohibited on U.S. soil since the civil war. Where does any person see Blacks enslaved or chained on U.S. soil today? In fact, Obama, who says he’s Black, not White, is quite wealthy since the elections of 2008. And, Oprah, a Black woman, hit the news as one of the wealthiest women in the nation.
Remember, words matter and if Obama’s words lead the nation and the world to think that Americans discriminate against Blacks and treat them as slaves or discriminate against Hispanics, than that is not helpful to the image of the United States of America. Such a message doesn’t create peace among citizens, but polarize citizens. The truth is that Americans marched with Martin Luther King during the 1960s and fought for civil rights for the Black Americans. In fact, Mexico and America were allies until the federal government failed to enforce the borders. This administration has encouraged illegals to enter into the U.S. and promised the illegals entitlements so the illegals believe that they are entitled to live in America without going through legal immigration procedures. I don’t support profiling, but if the borders were secured as required by federal law then the issue of illegal immigration would diminish.
Furthermore, if Americans were enslaving Black Americans or discriminating against Blacks and Hispanics, there are U.S. laws that people can pursue to help protect themselves from discrimination. How is it that he doesn’t talk about the discrimination against Americans and Christians and Jews by the Muslim world?
Should Americans then not ask how is it that Barack Hussein Obama has been admitted into the White House for two terms and holds himself out as a Black man, knowing he’s a Mulatto, prove him to be prejudice against his other half of his own genetic race? Doesn’t such behavior make comments about Black slavery moot after being admitted to the highest office in the land as an non-vetted Black U.S. President? Also, a large number of Black Americans and more ethnic citizens have been elected into public office in recent years which renders this a land of opportunity for all. Ireland, a majority of whites, support Obama, so where’s the discrimination against Black Americans? The fact is that the American people believe that public servants must be held accountable should they be involved in scandals or violate the Rule of Law, including Article II, Section 1, accordingly, so if demanding that constitutional law be upheld is racists then it will only be racists in the eyes of those who are guilty and oppose upholding the Rule of Law. The accusations against public servants on any and all levels shouldn’t be dismissed no more than accusations against average citizens accused of wrong doing by this regime. There are many Blacks and a good number of Hispanics working in the White House. A liberal Hispanic woman has been appointed into the Supreme Court which proves that America is a land of opportunity for all people who strive for a better life.
How is it okay for public servants to allow people they favor to violate constitutional law and not hold them accountable, but punish law-abiding legal Americans based on an accusation for the same violation of the law even if innocent? Any public servant who violates the Code of Ethics or the Rule of Law should not be excused from their actions because of their race or ethnicity. It is true that political speeches can pit people against each other and divide Americans. Speeches read by public servants from the White House should be taken seriously when they are pitting Black and White Americans against each other.
Therefore, Public Servants shouldn’t be allowed to exempt themselves, or hold themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, no matter what their race, or ethnicity. Public Servants should not be allowed by law to exempt congress, illegals, union members, refugees, or foreign immigrants from complying with the pay-up-front unconstitutional mandates or excessive penalties implemented by ObamaCare or for Traffic Tickets or Court Fines, City and County fines, or excessive taxes or excessive tax penalties. If a law is good enough for the American people then it should be good enough for all public servants unless they admit that they aren’t U.S. citizens. Only criminals and Non-Citizens and Foreigners whose goal it is to change America into the foreign nation as they unlawfully hold themselves above Constitutional Laws.
In conclusion, the pattern of unconstitutional and unethical agendas that began in the 1990’s through 2015 are creating a majority of Americans who don’t trust their legislatures. They have failed to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Sovereignty and allowed the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and failed to fund small businesses and create jobs for 7 years for legal Americans. In fact, they have a pattern of attacking Americans who took the risk to build a business and employ Americans. Americans were shocked when they witnessed the United States Congressional members led by Senators McCain, Graham, and Levin, shove the NDAA Law down the throats of Americans. The Democratic and RINO Congress shoved the Patriot Act and Obamacare down the throats of the taxpayers against the objections of the majority of Americans. These laws are in opposition of U.S. Constitutional Laws and appear to target Americans, not so much foreign enemies. (This article may be shared but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). [Follow – Reblog – Comment Below]
Twitter@Rose4Justice, Facebook/RoseColombo, LinkedIn/Rose4Justice
Books: 1) Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help at amazon.com
Books: 2) Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, political satire at amazon.com
Radio: 1) Rose Colombo N The Justice Club, MWF, 9am-10:30am pst or 12p-1:30pm est-usa, Listen Live Worldwide Online, Podcsts, (347) 324-3704, http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Radio: 2) Women Fight Back, Rose Colombo and Victoria Lee Scott, Every Wednesday, 10:30am-12p pst-use and 1:30pm-3pm est -Listen Live worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-3704 – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice, Pinterest, Digg, Tumblr. Google+
“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”
Wake up, America! How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land? It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a restructured set of laws replacing freedom and liberty, in my opinion. ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!
In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must notgo down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”
After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers. A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period! There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress.
So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval? Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself – the authority to conceal his identity from the government – and from the public. It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval. When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land? This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval? Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?
Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law? This makes it very difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge, Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.
The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent foreign and anti-American usurpers from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President. It is the birthright of every U.S. Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected. The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions, and for the preservation of Western Civilization so future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.
For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America. He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions. Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority.
A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions. Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education. All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens.
A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.”
Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation? It appears to me that the American people should be very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law. How is that?
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections. The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place. In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.
Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit. On the day of the inauguration about January 2009, Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech. Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV. A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.
But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II, the question remains if he intended to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal? Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself the authority to conceal his identification records from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals? So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?
Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical? After all, Article II requires identification of the public servant and proof that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.
On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws. Thus, how is an amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to alter Article II to the 111th Congress and seek Congressional approval?
So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record. The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.
Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses. After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor. The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections. And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual. After the elections of 2008, published records from the Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record. If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information.
As I stated, this begs the question of why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II be considered an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?
These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth. And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President. Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.
How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens. ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved. The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims, SEIU union members, possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals. So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty, then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?
In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.
ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation. Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off taxes of the hard working American citizens. ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.
Therefore, I have three questions: 1) How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress? 2) How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people; 3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare? (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices. She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices. Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –
by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder
Did Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?
In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about March 2012. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly. Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?
Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants; but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future. Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?
Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law. For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter? The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive. So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty? Also, the attacks on Libya, in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.
Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies? Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority? Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?
Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution. He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States
Rep. Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree. Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal basis.” He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”
Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act. He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.
Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.” He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you. If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.
Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.” Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis. Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here. We want to build an international support.
Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat. Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by Panetta’s statements.
Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.
So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress? Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution. It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.
In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?
The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitutionand Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175). It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it. They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere. For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion. I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another. I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.” In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.
Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers? How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends. How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place? At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.
Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation. How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution? For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder, without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price. If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?
Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or 2 men the right to knight themselves with absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen? Obama called the attack on Libya, a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?
In conclusion, if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country. If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern, it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.
Furthermore, if the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion? America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?
How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA? By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial? Even a guilty person should be given a trial! In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now. The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds. The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only. By the way, how is that even legal in America? It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws. Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages! Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Click the like button and leave a comment, please. You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit Disclaimer: Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/19/2011
We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009. Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members between 2009 – 2011. The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.
Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit” list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government? It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens. If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law? A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!
Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008: “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies. It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members. There are hundreds of missing guns!
Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.” Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money. The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.
How is it that the Obama czars, the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Homeland Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?
We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley. We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation. More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.
Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.
The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:
1. 1992: Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.
2. 2000: Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits. She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign. She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.
3. March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.
4. March 25, 2004: SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)
5. July 29, 2005: S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing
6. September 2005: Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune
7. 2006: Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]
8. 2008: New York Times: “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].
9. October 20, 2008: Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
10. March 13, 2009: Gun Ban List: HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.
11. L.A. Times 3/27/2009: “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”
Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”
“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”
12. March 2009: Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A. Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%]. They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.
13. March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.
14. May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.
15. August 14, 2009: CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1: “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”
16. August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2: Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.
17. June 28, 2010: The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”
18. July 20, 2010: The Examiner by Howard Portney read: “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”
Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest; or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?
19. May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.
20. June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’ Clinton said in an interview. “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
21. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.
22. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.
23. August 2010: Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights: She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.
24. August 2010: Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders: Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts. She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.
25. September 2, 2010: Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics. [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]
26. January 8, 2011: Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents. Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.
27. Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury. He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.
28. January 8, 2011: LiteNews.com – U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life. Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush. He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner. Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency. The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll. Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.
29. February 23, 2011 Letter: Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”
30. February 2011 Letter posted on-line: Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico. “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”
31. June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein: “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations. This administration routinely ignores subpoenas. The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.” .
32. May 23, 2011: CNN seen on You Tube video: Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks. [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)
33. 2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.
On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America. On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body. On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki. Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?” These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.
In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date, as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens. The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future. **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).
The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review. Read Reviews andcomplimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015
How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld? Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law. Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows: “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”
In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators. The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent. This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical lawmakers who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.” Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights, And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the Law of Nations.
Sharia Law states it is a Law. And, it is a foreign Law! The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period. It is called “Treason.” Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East. Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well. The experts on Sharia state that Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law. It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.
Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated. Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel. The U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from church and state and provides freedom of religion in America. In other words, Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately. Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization with Sharia Law. And, there lies a major difference. The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.
In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow. In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!
On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land. There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization. It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs. Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.
Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food, and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children. But, in America, a majority of U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches. Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level? Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization. We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!
For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil. Should we not ask if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans? If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization, then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported. Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely. In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.
In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare. It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty. In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill? If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped from their titles by We The People?
It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason. Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by. The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!
Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only? Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?
The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare. This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves! I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.
The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance. It’s their way or the highway! Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often. The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.
Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion! It states what it is – Sharia Law. A LAW! In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world. One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization. The radicals killed 3,000 Americans. They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration. They damaged the Pentagon. They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke. Many 911 witnesses who came forward and testified about what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind. Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.
Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East. They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims. They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books. The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.
Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.” Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not political “Laws,” but separate laws in America. Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time. Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization. And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment. The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food. Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.
The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:
In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” onemust understand their meaning and intent and purpose. The Law defines “Religion” as follows: “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”
Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation. If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.
The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ? And, why does a health care law include 2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts? Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans. It uses programs to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies. Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world. The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.
Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses. And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law. What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States? In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state. People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.
Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution. Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.
Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths? Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag. Again, Sharia Law states exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws. Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal? How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law! Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?
Treason: “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies. Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary. (Note: Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer. It’s unethical to ignore the laws of plagiarism)
If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated
Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows
Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding” with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com