“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”
Wake up, America! How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land? It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a restructured set of laws replacing freedom and liberty, in my opinion. ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!
In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must notgo down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”
After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers. A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period! There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress.
So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval? Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself – the authority to conceal his identity from the government – and from the public. It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval. When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land? This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval? Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?
Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law? This makes it very difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge, Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.
The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent foreign and anti-American usurpers from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President. It is the birthright of every U.S. Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected. The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions, and for the preservation of Western Civilization so future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.
For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America. He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions. Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority.
A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions. Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education. All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens.
A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.”
Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation? It appears to me that the American people should be very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law. How is that?
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections. The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place. In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.
Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit. On the day of the inauguration about January 2009, Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech. Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV. A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.
But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II, the question remains if he intended to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal? Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself the authority to conceal his identification records from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals? So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?
Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical? After all, Article II requires identification of the public servant and proof that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.
On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws. Thus, how is an amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to alter Article II to the 111th Congress and seek Congressional approval?
So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record. The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.
Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses. After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor. The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections. And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual. After the elections of 2008, published records from the Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record. If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information.
As I stated, this begs the question of why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II be considered an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?
These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth. And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President. Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.
How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens. ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved. The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims, SEIU union members, possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals. So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty, then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?
In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.
ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation. Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off taxes of the hard working American citizens. ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.
Therefore, I have three questions: 1) How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress? 2) How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people; 3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare? (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices. She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices. Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –
Rose Colombo, award-winning author, Legal Advocate, Activist, and Coach, created the question that rang out across the nation in 2009, when she posed the question, “How is the Obamacare “Mandate” Constitutional or legal? She sent the question to every congressional member in her worldwide Blog, “Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal” and her question was read with her name on the congressional floor and debated in the Supreme Court. (pub (c). 4/6/2012, rev 3/29/2012, rev 4/27/2013, 6/21/2013), rev. 10/8/2013
The End Times are Upon the World! That was the cry of many, but the Mayans may not have been stating that December 12, 2012 was the end of the world, but signaling that it’s the beginning of the end under the Obama regime working within the federal government’s intent to “fundamentally transform ” America taking American to a dangerous crossroad leaving Americans vulnerable to unconstitutional laws that could lead to the death of millions of Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Citizen!
The Obama regime appears to be preparing to implement police states and approving unconstitutional and immoral laws upon the American people. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, asked the question if the federal government’s next mandate is to order that all Americans buy Broccoli, a consumer product or elect a dog for U.S. President if the vetting laws and Identification laws aren’t required!
The US Supreme Court Justices debated the question of the “mandate” which I created and sent to every Congressman, blogged worldwide, and ended up read on the congressional floor with my name. The 112th Congress was negligent and appeared derelict in their duty which requires that they read and study each law in-depth, but they approved 2700 pages of unread laws which shocked the nation and rubber stamped it in favor of Obama when they took bribes for votes!
The duties of a U.S. President are limited, yet this non-vetted and unidentified president has been granted absolute powers to declare the Congress and the Constitution basically as meaningless and stated that he could do whatever he wants and no one can stop him because he has a phone and a pen and he’s the Commander-in-Chief, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief of the American people; in fact, it is the American people who are his Commander-in-Chief and who must take back the pen and the phone before more Americans die on the battlefield, not just the foreign battlefield, but the domestic battlefield on U.S. soil as declared by Obama and Congress.
In an unprecedented announcement, Speaker Pelosi announced that Congress approved the unread mandates, regulations, taxes, and punishments included in Obamacare without performing their duty and studying each law, but she declared Americans would like it after it’s approved so they can find out what’s in it sort of like a Jack in the Box affect, only Americans found out that it was more like “Chuckie” jumping out and attacking and shredding the U.S. Constitution with his knife.
Today, Obama and Congress shamelessly exempt themselves without any constitutional authority from signing up, paying up, and from liability or punishment for passing the unread Obamacare and approving it with a rubber stamp! They discriminate against Americans who aren’t in their inner circle as well as Muslims, Refugees from the Middle East, Donors, Bundlers, SEIU and others.
After the Obamacare red carpet was stained with a series of serious glitches and billions are being spent to try to fix something that can’t be fixed, the truth is that Americans are losing their existing health care coverage and suffering because they can’t access their doctors or treatments or else they’re treatments and medications are unaffordable or the deductibles and premiums are unaffordable, so now there is equality! Not only do illegals, and the Muslims and all those who didn’t have health care prior to Obamacare was implement, it’s a fact that Americans will also be without health care as more hospitals close their doors and retreat to becoming an Urgent Care facility. And, that’s not to mention the millions of jobs that will be lost because of Obamacare! Obamacare is actually making more Americans very sick!
Wake Up, Americans! Are the majority of Americans aware that former impeached President Bill Clinton ordered a study on “Human Capital?” Recently, Bill Clinton was in the news alluding that Americans will like Communism. Hillary Clinton made international news during the congressional hearings when she was questioned about her friend, who was the U.S. Ambassador, and 3 murdered military men killed by terrorist attacks at Benghazi and she angrily replied, “What difference does it make?” Also, President Obama hit the news when asked about murdered American soldiers and the US Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and he casually remarked that they were mere “bumps in the road.”
Human Capital is the study of individuals and allows the federal government to determine the value or lack of value of each human being based upon gender, age, health, possibly religion, politics, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, and IQ or talents versus the lack of worth to the federal government and the cost to the government, i.e., an individuals cost for health care treatments, food, housing, and education. This is a Orwellian 1984 agenda. It represents a Nazi type of agenda with the intent of creating collectivism as well as a means of reducing the population and creating a Master Slave mentality. This is also the dream of creating the Master Race. Yet, the American people have been cheering on the Obama’s and the Clinton’s and support and defend their dream of a New World Order demanding every individual march to the drum beat and comply or else be punished.
Furthermore, past and current congressional members failed to perform their fiduciary duty as required by the 14th Amendment and their sworn oaths and job duties that require each member to read and study each law in-depth! They not only failed to study each law in-depth and assure the American people that each law, mandate, regulation, punishment, tax, and penalty are written in accordance with the US Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans and reflect the best interest of the American people. They failed or refused to read 2700 pages of laws, which in my opinion, appear to be a serious dereliction of duty. But, which public servant working in the taxpayer-funded federal government cares about the US Constitution? After all, it is the non-vetted President Obama who stated more than once that the U.S. Constitution is flawed and that it is “meaningless?” He stated, “The Constitution is a mere charter of negative [liberties] that need to be changed.”
Hypocrites! Too many members of the White House and Congress are hypocrites and they appear to be lawmakers who have turned into law breakers as they hold themselves above the laws which they mandate for the American people and exempt themselves from the laws. Laws are written for criminals as law-abiding citizens don’t violate the laws. Criminals exempt themselves from the law and hold themselves above the law, but law-abiding citizens follow the Rule of Law and public servants swear to uphold U.S. Constitutional law.
Should the American people not ask which constitutional authority is the White House and Congress applying that grants these public servants the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they mandate as constitutional law on U.S. soil, even though they admit that the laws are unread and possibly unconstitutional and illegal? After all, if they weren’t read, how would they know what’s in them when they rubber stamped them “approved.” Perhaps, it would have been wiser to rubber stamp Obamacare, “D.O.A.,” dead on arrival.
Consequently, it’s amazing to me that the American people haven’t bothered to ask how unread and unconstitutional laws can be legal on U.S. soil or how people can be punished on U.S. soil for failing to comply with unread or unconstitutional laws? The fact that they are unread should render them unconstitutional on their face! This problem should raise the question under which constitutional law is Obama and Congress applying that provides them the authority to write discriminatory constitutional laws and grants them the authority to exempt people who they favor or where there are huge conflicts of interest wuch as bundlers, donors, and supporters?
If Obamacare is such a great improvement to the healthcare industry then why would the Obama’s and Sebelius, Biden, and congressional members want to exempt themselves from complying with Obamacare? This problem begs the question if they realize that Page 107 of Obamacare includes making Americans slaves of the Muslim immigrants and refugees living in the USA by referring to Americans on this page as Dhimmis? If you don’t know what a Dhimmi is then you should read up because from my research it means “slave.” In other words, the American people must comply and pay up for their housing, food, and health care. Could this be one of the key reasons why Obama is so adamant about forcing Obamacare upon the American people?
Another key reason for Obamacare appears to be depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and he approved of Infanticide of U.S. Natural Born Citizens while he was a senator which means babies that are born after abortion are left to die. In fact, senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act with the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, and others, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires that Americans pick up the tab to kill these babies with abortion scissors in the USA and around the world! This flies against the moral majority and Christians and Catholics who are being wiped out by terrorists around the world! This Global Poverty Act that Obama signed as an Executive Order about January 2009 diminished the constitutional Right-to-Life and it reflects a depopulation program similar to that of the U.N. Agenda 21.
Obamacare or the ACA or [un]Affordable Care Act is not so affordable. In fact, most people can’t afford to sign up or comply because he’s increased their Health Care Premiums by 40% to 100% depending upon the plan. It’s been reported in the news that about three million Americans are not without health care insurance because of Obamacare as their insurance companies cancelled their plans. In fact, Obamacare robs from Peter to pay Paul. Peter is Medicare and is being robbed by Obama to pay for Obamacare which diminished the services for seniors, veterans, disabled, and the very sick who rely on Medicare.
If Obamacare is such an outstanding and legal benefit being implemented as a national takeover of the healthcare industry by the federal government then why must the federal government mandate excessive taxation, excessive penalties, excessive punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits those excesses? If Obamacare is so wonderful then why are doctors retiring early and expressing their disdain for Obamacare? And, why are businesses closing down and laying off American employees or reducing their work hours which reduces productivity because of Obamacare? This will increase the cost of consumer products to Americans because businesses will be forced to pay higher premiums for their part-time employees including illegal citizens!
Justice Scalia questioned if Obama, who implemented the umbrella law known as ObamaCare, could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off base at all! After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat! And Mayor Bloomberg is pushing what and how much Americans can drink. And, Monsinto, oops, I mean Monsanto, is pushing GMO’s on the world and fighting against labeling their products. Michelle Obama is promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks. The Redistribution program which includes the snack and spy program is described in my latest political satire on how Obamacare and Redistribution of wealth could devastate a free Judeo-Christian Nation that leaves the reader with thought-provoking messages on these agendas and it’s titled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs,Red Necks and Radicals” available at amazon.com
Therefore, Obama is selling snake oil to the American people. His health care is more about death care because his program includes death panels, euthanasia, enslavement to foreigners and donors, and depopulation through same-sex agendas and mandated abortions. His committee of 15 will determine who lives and who dies based upon their evaluation of each individual as human capital who will be no more than a commodity of value or little value to the federal government. As I stated, if Obamacare is such a wonderful health care program then Obama and Biden, Sebelius, senators Reid, Pelosi, and the entire Congress should be the first to sign up, and comply with their own laws, otherwise they are law breakers and holding themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, but are failing to follow the Rule of Law which they swore to do.
How then are the American people not rising up and demanding that Congress Repeal and stop the funding before the tsunami hits that is coming upon U.S. citizens in January 2014? How is it that Obama, Biden, and Congress are determined to destroy the greatest health care industry in the world and force Americans into the worst HMO system that they could ever imagine? Obama and his regime are forcing Americans to pay up front against their will for mandated abortions and death panels or else be punished? Isn’t that like paying for your own demise and the demise of your family, friends, unborn babies, and fellow Americans and helping make the U.S. Natural Born Citizen extinct? How is it that Americans can’t see this as a silent genocide without war or guns on what Obama and congress now refer to as a battlefield? Does it not appear that the federal government is at war with America and Americans?
Should the American citizens not ask why do we need a committee of 15 approved by Obama to determine if they will send Americans to early end of life counseling and pull the plug on grandma or the very sick or veterans? Is this program intended to save money for the federal government so foreign immigrants and illegals and Refugees can move into the USA and access food, housing, and Obamacare without paying up, because it will be paid on the backs of US taxpayers and create a nation of federal government works vs. a nation of citizens on entitlement programs dependent upon the federal government to take care of them since their focus has been on destroying jobs, not creating jobs!
Obviously, Americans will be mere chattel used as commodities and as “human capital” while Obama golf’s at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day to the U.S. taxpayers. The Obama Muslim Brotherhood and non-vetted czars and Congress will allow this committee of 15 to determine who will be euthanized, denied or rationed health care services based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government. Unless the law has been amended, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply and pay up front for Obamacare could spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty, so many will never get a monopoly card to get out of jail.
In fact, the federal government grants to themselves the right to raid and confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the federal government under Obamacare. Obama has enacted a NSA Massive Surveillance Program recently exposed by Whistleblower named Edward Snowden who most believe to be a U.S. hero. It’s my opinion that the massive set of Obamacare laws replaces the Constitution of the United States and denies Freedom, Liberty, and Rights.
Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare. So, why did I write the first blog in 2009 warning the nation and Congress – “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:
1. How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legallyand constitutionally moved forward to hear the unread 2700 pages without review, debate or congressional study prior to hitting the U.S. Supreme Court. Shockingly, the majority of Supreme Court Justices approved the unconstitutional ObamaCare and Justice Robert nailed the last nail into the coffin that would end the best health care system in the world.
Consequently, Justice Elena Kagan refused to Recuse herself from the Obamacare case even though there were documented reports related to her long time association with student Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama. After Harvard received a $20M donation from the Saudi Prince and Obama was named President of the Harvard Law Review, it’s reported that Kagan worked on a project to help create an Islamic Studies program at Harvard. Thereafter, it’s reported that Senator Obama appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and she worked on Obamacare and favored it and represented him in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thereafter, he appointed her as a U.S. Justice right before the Obamacare case was to be decided.
upreme Court while Solicitor General according to the records reported in the news. As a result, the majority of Americans requested that Justice Kagan remove herself from voting on Obamacare, but she refused and Justice Roberts refused to do so. There are many reports of the long time favorable association Kagan and Obama since he attended Harvard when she was Dean Kagan. In fact, the news posted a video that documented a special event when Dean Kagan held a special even for Senator Obama and she stated he was the most brilliant student to ever attend Harvard.
After Obama was elected as a non-vetted U.S. President, he appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him in an eligibility case while she was Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. which is considered unethical according to the Code of Ethics. Also, after Obama took office as an non-vetted U.S. President, Kagan worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General. Obama then nominated Kagan for the position of U.S. Justice. And, the Conflict of Interest is that these behaviors give the appearance of grave Conflicts of Interest as she was elevated thereafter to that of U.S. Justice right before Obamacare was to be voted upon. This behavior is similar to being a guest in Las Vegas by the CEO and Pit Boss of a luxurious casino. You put your money on the table, but the dice are stacked against you without your knowledge and you lose the shirt on your back. These issues casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court. It will take generations if at all possible to restore trust in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices.
2. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to “avoid” Article II of the U.S. Constitution? The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing . It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly non-vetted president who admits that his father is foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Great Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen cannot have a foreign born parent even if born on U.S. soil for that makes him a “naturalized citizen,” but not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.”
The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question and has been the resource used by congress for 237 years.
3. Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,700 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved? After all, it is the fiduciary duty required by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and their duty to the American people that the U.S. Congress read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before the laws are debated in the Supreme Court.
4. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?
5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?
6. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy? How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress to approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign? How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?
7. Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya. So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?
8. Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law, but then how is it that they are writing laws which are on federal land, not located on the soil of the USA? Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?
9. Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earningsafter taxes –earnings are private property– so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings aka private property to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections which the government may or may not provide with complete immunity?
Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty. Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?” In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care. Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution, known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.
So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front money scheme for Obamacare be paid up-front into the government’s fund without accountability as they know nothing, see nothing, and hear nothing when they are caught at wrong doing, and stand on the 5th and refuse to answer the questions as to what happened to the money?
How does it not border on extortion when law-abiding Americans have an imaginary gun placed to their heads by government thugs telling them to pay-up-front with their own earnings, even if they don’t want the consumer product, because consumer products are paid with private property aka personal earnings then taxes are paid. Why are Americans being forced under the threat of fear or punishment to pay up for a consumer product they don’t want and may never receive as the government retains the right to deny or ration said services?
Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Social Security with the promise of saving the taxpayers money for retirement by forced taxation from personal earnings? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than collecting taxes for Medicare and after they divert the money from Medicare, they tell the taxpayers, too bad, we’re denying or cutting services to seniors? Could Obamacare become the a bigger Ponzi scheme than the Redistribution of Wealth? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Patient Dumping at University Hospital for big profits and bonuses by the staff? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than the fraud of the Housing Crisis implemented by Congress and Bankers? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than promising 350,000 infrastructure jobs in exchange for billions of dollars? Could Obamacare be a bigger Ponzi scheme than Solyndra whose bundler owner took the taxpayers money then gave himself and partner big bonuses and wages and bankrupted? Could Obamacare be the biggest Ponzi Scheme to make and create big taxes for depopulation programs and to create big profits for politicians, banksters, and Wall Street?
Is This THE KEY TO ENSLAVE US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS? Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into aprivate enterprise as a for-profit health care industryas well as acting as the federal government with the intent to control a private corporation known as the national health care industry is unconstitutional. So where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to take over private corporations on US soil since they operate on federal soil with “limited powers and are now acting as a dual government and free enterprise running private corporations for-profit and excessive taxes with punishment?
The the truth is that only public servants, military, and foreign immigrants, swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, but the U.S. Natural Born Citizens born to two legal American parents on U.S. soil, who are the only persons eligible to be a U.S. President aren’t required to swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution unless those person enter public service or the military or they are foreign immigrants granted US Naturalized citizenship. U.S. Natural Born Citizens Pledge Allegiance to the U.S. Flag, but that doesn’t protect them under U.S. Constitutional laws if they haven’t sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps, that’s the reason some judges state to U.S. Natural Born Citiznes in court that they have no constitutional rights.
Therefore, how is it that U.S. Natural Born Citizens aren’t swearing an oath by the age of 7 to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? So, if US Natural Born Citizens aren’t sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but public servants, military, and foreign immigrants do swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, then how does that not leave the door open on U.S. soil for public servants to enslave and indefinitely detain U.S. Natural Born Citizens if they aren’t sworn to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution which establishes their guaranteed liberty, freedom and rights? If that’s not true then why are foreign immigrants required to swear an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in order to be guaranteed constitutional protections? Also, how can a federal entity operating on federal land outside of the USA, District of Columbia, which isn’t part of the United States of America, be mandating laws for the separate states in the USA since the federal government is a separate federal entity working on federal soil, granted “limited powers” known as the District of Columbia, which isn’t U.S. soil? Shouldn’t the District of Columbia become a State of the USA so they can operate as part of the USA, so now you know why the Framers granted them “Limited Powers.” Otherwise, a foreign entity known as the federal government working on federal land would stomp their Big Foot on individuals and individual state laws. Today, the federal government has trampled on “limited powers” and are lawless and have gone dictatorial rogue?
Furthermore, Obamacare will lead to collectivism. These laws will force citizens out of the suburbs into the cities where fewer people can be more easily controlled. These laws will reduce the income of the Middle Class U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and no doubt will devastate the quality of life and the quality of the current health care industry. So, should we not ask what is the difference between the mafia, who force people to hand over money against their will and who comply under fear and threat of losing their homes or businesses or be punished? Today, we have a non-vetted president who appears to be punish Americans and represented himself as a poor black kid with a white mother who is golfing at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day for rent and taking $100,000,000 vacations at taxpayer’s expense while denying services and jobs to Americans who pay his wages and pay up for his luxurious lifestyle! Americans are hurting for jobs and struggling to buy gas and food as costs increase, but reckless spending is ok? Has the US Congress and the American people lost their minds and all common sense and logic? It appears that We The People have forgotten that they are the government.
How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws of “limited powers?” If the federal government is taking over and running a private corporation, the health care industry, then shouldn’t the government be providing disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase with their personal earnings against their objections?
The Boards of Consumer Affairs require consumer disclosures, laws, policies, requirements, and regulations of consumer products sold to consumers prior to selling or providing consumer products so is the federal government above those laws, as well? Is the federal government operating as a national health care industry and obtaining business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses or Medical Malpractice Insurance? After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people! As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war or by guns, which is serious. Americans need to demand disclosure on their rights under Obamacare if they experience rationing or being denied services or prescriptions and their rights relating to any damages caused by such actions as well as the right to file lawsuits.
And, even more remarkableis the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, which Obamacare doesn’t favor be ordered to pay up front for services or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.
In fact, Eric Holder, stated, “Americans will be polarized. The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years. There will be no majority race in America.” Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Natural Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV, Due Process of Law, and replacing it with the NDAA Law? In my latest political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,the dinosaurs are confronted with mandated abortions as the elders fight back knowing that mandated abortions will reduce their population. This keepsake exposes the dangers of Obamacare and Redistribution of America’s wealth to anti-American nations.
In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, Obamacare is discriminatory, unconstitutional, unread, and possibly illegal. Obamacare borders on laws mandated in tyrannical Third World nations by dictators who hold themselves above the law as they punish their citizens or cause their demise. Is there any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug on the street, who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else?’ Or a thug who says, “Hand over your money or else?” What if a car dealer told you, “You’re required to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all.” What’s the difference? (Note: This article may be shared but please do not remove content without giving credit to the writer and please don’t plagiarize the content, much appreciated.
LIKE – COMMENT – REBOG – FOLLOW – buttons on top and bottom and welcome
Follow Rose or Rose4Justice
Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse or Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals, at amazon.com
You Tube – Rose4Justice or Rose Colombo
Radio : The Justice Club – google Freedomizer Radio – MWF 11am-12p (pdt) – 2-3p (est-usa) – Call or listen & speak out at (347) 324-3704
Radio: Constitutionally Speaking – Fridays, 4:30-6p (pdt) and 7:30p-9p (est-usa) – google Freedomizer Radio or listen online or ipods or Call & listen & speak out (347) 324-3704
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice Pinterest Google+ Tumbler DIGG
Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational and entertainment purposes only. <a
Follow and Share. Like and Comment at bottom of the page or read comments by readers at the end of the article
The Bible states, “Woe to you lawyers!’ Luke 11:46
The definition of a U.S. Natural Born or Native Born Citizen as defined in the Constitution referred to as a requirement of Article II and references the Law of Nations, pub. by Emerich de Vattel, 1758 – written into the U.S. Constitution for definition as well as the Declaration of Independence as follows:
“The U.S. natural-born citizen of a nation is a baby born to two U.S. natural-born citizens whose baby is born on U.S. soil at the time of birth.” In addition, “for if he is born of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth and not his country.”
Wake up, America! Ring the Liberty Bell loud and clear. The Liberty Bell is ringing out with alarm warning Americans that their U.S. Constitution is being shredded by a man, whose eligibility is in question as president of the United States Barack Hussein Obama is by-passing congress and the constitution and writing Executive Orders that deny access to Article II and Article IV without Congress invoking their authority to Repeal those executive orders. He’s writing E.O. in secret to migrate millions of Muslims linked to Hamas, a terrorist group, into the USA using U.S. tax dollars. Article II and Article IV are blowing in the wind in an ugly direction. In fact, by Obama’s own writings and admission, he states that his father is “foreign-born” – a subject of Britain at the time of Obama’s birth – making Obama a subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948. Such improper vetting which has been brought before the court and congress does not reflect transparency and is not in accordance with Article II, thus leaving his eligibility without proper vetting and congressional certification as required by constitutional law, Article II, unresolved. by the Democratic-RINO Congressional members, but why?
Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and U.S. Justices applying which would justify their decision to avoid Article II, a very important law of the land, as it involves the highest office in the land? Has the U.S. Congress relinquished their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, country, the flag? Is the Constitution suspended or revoked? They appear to be intentionally ignoring their sworn oath and fiduciary duty as they avoid and ignore Article II which remains of serious public interest to the American people. For example, since 2008, the congress continues to pass laws which the majority of Americans do not believe are in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of legal taxpaying Americans. The Democratic and Rino Congress appear to be boldly refusing to perform their fiduciary duty as they bow down to Obama and kiss his ring and pass laws that affect the lives and livelihood and freedom of every American by their “Gross Negligence” and intentional faiure to read the proposed laws by their own admittance such as Obamacare, but instead, they appear to be taking bribes for votes and engaging in Insider trading and taking No-Bid Contracts to build their family’s personal wealth.
In fact, the majority of Americans believe that the NDAA Law, the Patriot Act, mandated abortions, assassinations and hit lists and indefinite detention of Americans based on accusations only are unconstitutional. Also, ObamaCare is not in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of Americans. Yet, the 111th congress didn’t seem to care as they passed unread laws that deny freedom and liberty under the guise of health care and approved “Death to America” as it includes “death panels for Americans only and punishment for Americans who don’t pay up!” The Muslims and Illegals do not have to sign up, pay up or be punished. The Congress, Obama’s, Justices, Bundlers, Donors, SEIU, Muslims, and Illegals are being held above the law and do not have to comply with the 27000 pages of the unread rubber stamped “approved” mandates, excessive taxes, and punishments including in Obamacare.
In fact, they didn’t hold Obama and the executive office accountable for firing off 220 Tomahawks at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk to the American taxpayers without congressional approval firing off at Libya, who never threatened America, as well as killing civilians; women, children, and Freedom Fighters. They didn’t hold Obama accountable for granting $40M and an additional $535 Millions to Obama’s bundler, a co-owner of Solyndra, who took excessive wages and bonuses before bankrupting Solyndra. Anything wrong with this picture, America?
And, there’s the missing billion or so granted to the IMF! The Missing billions from the Pentagon and State Department! How about the Recovery Funds promised for 350,000 Infrastructure Jobs with knowledge that the promised jobs to Americans to repair the Infrastructure never existed?
Or how about the Recovery Funds promised for those Infrastructure jobs divertedd over to Eric Holder’s Department under his watch used for a program called “Fast and Furious” when hundreds of innocent people along the borders were murdered for 2 years and until the two Border Patrol Officers were murdered with US guns, the program was halted. How is that justified when human life is no longer considered “sacred,” but “meaningless” and the government uses taxpayer funds to hire straw men to sell untracked guns and traffic them into Mexico and sell them to cartels without tracking the cartels which is Law Enforcement 101?
Shall we then determine if the congress, senate, Justices, and federal judges, are working for or against the American Citizens by their actions? The entire government is a majority of Lawyers as Judges and Justices are lawyers, too, The American people keep voting for lawyers into Congress and into the Oval Office, even disbarred lawyers who violated the law. The nation is run by lawyers! Lawyers are a self-policing, self-disciplining, and self-protecting brotherhood. These lawyers and Judges have knowledge of the definition of a U.S. Natural Born citizen at their finger tips known as the Law of Nations! How is it they knew the definition until Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro was slipped into office?
What then shall we say to our children and grandchildren when America’s history is changed and inserted with false foreign history and our nation’s constitutional laws are shredded and blowing in the wind as they migrate millions of foreign enemies under the guise of “Christian Refugees” into the USA even though in 2009, there weren’t any Christian Refugees fleeing ISIS? Why would young healthy males be allowed into the USA as Muslim Refugees – who are they fleeing?
How do we respond to the questions of our children and grandchildren and future generations who may never know about the Founding Fathers, U.S. History, and those who died to make America Great, Free, and Sovereign? Do we say, “We could have done some thing, but we did nothing?” Should we say, “We could have said some thing, but we remained silent?” Should we say, “We should have thrown the bums out, but we were fearful?” Is it not true that our non-vetted U.S. President with knowledge that vetting is required by Article II is a man, who concealed his identity from the world and the highest offices of government, as well as the American people, the only exception in 239 years?
Obama admitted that his lifetime hope and change is about fulfilling his father’s dreams, but that seems impossible since he admittedly only saw his dad once. His biological father, Barack Hussein Obama is reported in the news as a man who was already married to 3 Kenyan women with two children, yet, Obama’s account is that Obama, sr. was married to Obama’s white mother. Stanley Ann Dunham, on or about 1961, who was a Communist and part Jew, according to researchers as well as American born. Where is the proof that she married a foreign Muslim man in the USA who was already married with children in Kenya? How could she remarry without divorce papers filed in the USA? On the other hand, if Barack Hussein Obama, sr., married Stanley Ann Dunham on U.S. soil, he would have committed violated his sharia law. He would have committed “Bigamy” and committed a fraud upon his mother. So, the question remains, if his white mother married a Kenyan Muslim man who was already married with children than the question raised is did Stanley Ann Dunham have knowledge of the marriage or if Barack Obama sr. who committed a fraud upon Stanley Ann Dunham while studying in the United States on a foreign student loan at taxpayer’s expense and why did he transfer to Harvard since Obama is alleged to have been “elected” as the President of the Harvard Review when Elena Kagan was Dean and involved in assisting in a project accepting millions of dollars donated by the Saudi Prince in exchange to insert Muslim studies. Why would Harvard and Georgetown be accepting donations from a foreign enemy nation at the time it appears that Obama was being groomed?
In fact Barack Obama, Sr., an adult married man with children would have engaged in sexual relations with a white minor child at that time in the USA. which was a crime as there were strict segregation laws in the USA. This occurred before any civil rights movement changed any segretation laws. The history of segregation up through the civil rights movement and even thereafter had been tightly enforced. In fact, up through through the late 60’s, if a Black man was seen with a white woman, riots could break out. If Obama senior married Stanley Ann Dunham, a white minor child, it would have taken place at a time when a Black man with a young white woman would have been a violation of segregation laws and taken to court. I only point that out because this fairy tale story doesn’t make any sense about Obama and his alleged parents. However, Obama aka Barry Soetoro, presents his story as if there weren’t any racial problems or objections and no one noticed his parents having an affair.
Obama’s on-line birth certificate lists his dad as African at the time of his birth, but Americans point out that there wasn’t any such race in America at that time designed to be “African,” as a race. The term African-American wasn’t introduced until the early 1980’s. But, if his biological father was born in Africa then it would be correct to list his race as African, which confirms that his father is foreign-born, and a subject of Britain at Obama’s birth in 1961. Unfortunately, the birth certificates provided on-line are alleged to be forgeries or fakes and altered by forensic experts. Nevertheless, that would mean that Obama Senior passed his birthright onto Obama as a Black African Kenyan from Muslim roots and a Subject of Great Britain at birth, not as a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.
Also, several news articles report that Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., attended Harvard Law School on a foreign student loan, but Obama points out that his father believed America was an oppressive nation, so why would he come to America and what did he study? Perhaps, this is one of the reasons that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro stated about 2008 that other nations believe that America is an oppressive nation so he didn’t want to wear “that pin” the U.S. Flag, on his lapel or sing the National Anthem and place his hand on his heart. Obama believes that America must be transformed and that he’s been placed in power to bring hope and change and “redistribute” America’s wealth as he sees fit, as he stated that he is accountable to no one. His mission appears to be to fund the Muslim Brotherhood and its networks and does that make him their leader and mentor? After all, his glued to his hip sidekick is Valerie Jarrett whose long time generational family is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Ayers family and Chicago.
After his dad returned to Kenya, the Kenyan news reported that Obama sr. was killed in a car accident. In the book Dreams of My Father, Obama inferred that he is troubled by his mother’s race, but he is working on his problem. Therefore, it’s only logical to conclude by Obama’s own admission that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., was foreign-born in Kenya and a Subject of Britain making Obama ineligible to be a President of the USA legally and constitutionally. He’s stated the same in his speeches and that he was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro and attended school a Catholic School in Indonesia, but it’s also noted that only Islamic studies can be taught in Indonesia and not Catholicism or Christianity or the person could be subject to a death sentence. In fact, upon marriage, the child relinquishes their US Citizenship and must be registered as an Indonesian Citizen in order to attend school and study only Islamic studies.
Questions Missed by Journalists Researching This Issue: I noted that not one Journalist, to my knowledge, asked the question if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro could it be that Lolo Soetoro is the biological dad since, he too, attended the University of Hawaii at the same time as Stanley Ann and Obama, sr.? How about the fact which should be noted that if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, while residing in Indonesia, that their law makes Obama an automatic citizen of Indonesia upon marriage and only an Indonesian Citizen at that time could attend school in Indonesia. Another interesting point that Journalists missed is that if Stanley Ann married Lolo Soetoro, then wouldn’t she have to convert as a Muslim, under their Sharia Law? Radicals are’t allowed to marry unless the spouse converts. And, of course, there are those who believe that Obama is the son of Malcolm X and his name in Hawaii on a recorded traffic warrant read, “Barri or Bari Shabazz” which was reported to have been dismissed 25 years later, while he was a non-vetted active President of the USA.
Well then,shall we just shred Article II as another “meaningless” law since congress has not invoked their powers to protect Article II, Article IV, or preserve Due Process of Law? Due Process of Law was established by our Forefathers and it is the only protection from tyranny that shields the American people when falsely accused of being an enemy; non-compliant, dangerous, or extremist.
The only want foreign enemies can succeed is to implement the “Kill List” and “NDAA Law” and “Hate Crimes Bill” that only protects the foreign enemy invaders which are created to deny “Due Process of Law” to Americans and silence all Americans from saying anything about the foreign enemy invaders. Ask yourself if the law enforcers and the government’s military forces should be able to knock down your doors and drag you into the streets and execute you or indefinitely detain you in an unknown facility like a FEMA Camp or throw you on a FEMA train without charges filed, without a lawyer, and without a trial? Are you aware that doors are knocked down at gun point in America without the approval and oversight of a Judge?
The NDAA Law that Obama and Holder and Congress implemented denies “Due Process of Law” to all Americans and if targeted by the government and accused, makes us no different than a Third World Nation under a tyrannical dictator. The reason America is exceptional is because the Framers established 3 branches of government for Checks and Balances and established “Due Process of Law.” Knocking down doors at gun point happens in America based on accusations and innocent people have been injured or killed, even children? Are you aware that this happened during Katrina.
In fact, certain police officers shot and killed innocent homeless Americans standing on a bridge. In fact on or about April 2012, three of the shooters were sentenced to imprisonment and one police officer, who didn’t kill anyone was given a lighter sentence. Remember, there Americans, including seniors were forced out of their homes and the Bush administration ordered the enforcers to search their homes for guns during this natural disaster! Even seniors were removed from their homes and on video being manhandled. Tens thousand people were locked inside the New Orleans dome and denied the right to leave. They were indefinitely detained. And, there were reports swept under the carpet of hospital patients having been euthanized.
Is theGreat Republic being diminishedand brought to her knees by tyrannical laws; such as the NDAA Law, and the Patriot Act, or the Rapiscam, oops, I mean the Rapiscan full body naked x-ray and radiationscanner operated by unlicensed techs by a thug like system of being thrown into the microwave oven and naked radiated or else choose door #2 and upon entry submit to have a TSA worker who could be moles since they found them in the White House who grope you and your children and parents as well as unlicensed health care professionals at airports? Even x-ray Techs and Doctors must ask for a signature and consent to touch you or x-ray you! Sheriffs, must have gone through the academy and earned a badge! Americans can be punished for non-compliance(non-compliance is a term used by socialists), yet the Muslims are exempted?
How is it that ObamaCare which is not a law, nor is it about health care, but more about death to Americans and unborn future natural born Americans. It’s 2700 pages of unread mandates and punishments. It’s an umbrella with a set of laws that have nothing to do with health care. Obamacare includes hundreds of new restructured laws, regulations, mandates, punishments for Americans who aren’t favored and opted out are having every freedom and liberty denied under ObamaCare which is established and guaranteed in the Constitution? The 111th Congress admits that they never read the 2700 pages of punishment, jail time, fines, Cadillac Tax, and death panels included for Americans only, not for them or those they exempted. The Democrats or Obama didn’t disclose the secret $17 trillion in additional taxation, but approved the unconstitutional laws by rubber stamping them approved. The 111th Democratic Rino Congress were Negligent and Failed to perform their fiduciary duty as lawmakers to the taxpayers and citizens and voters.
Ironically, this unjust, unfair, and inequitable new umbrella covering a myriad of mandates and requirements for Americans only are dictatorial restructured laws that reek of favoritism, nepotism, and collectivism, discrimination, which in my opinion, replaces freedom and liberty, the Right-to-Life, and replaces the U.S. Constitution. In fact, ObamaCare favors millions of his union supporters, Muslims, illegals, and refugees, who won’t be punished and won’t have to pay up front for American death panels, or mandated abortions, mandated vaccinations, mandated early end of life counseling. It appears that Obamacare is the depopulation of future Americans, ederly, sick, and veterans and mentally challenged. Obamacare includes includes the threat of punishment, i.e, jailand penalties for those who don’t comply or pay up front for services not rendered and may never be rendered also known as death panels which borders on tyranny and extortion. Americans will get nothing back for their money and no Consumer Quality Care or Consumer guarantees. The enslaved Americans will be forced to pick up the tab for all those who are new Middle East immigrants, refugees, illegals as well as prisoners and federal workers.
Are therestill three branches of government in existence within the United States or is it all theatrics? Since 2008, the majority of Americans have concern as they witness the unethical actions of Congress and the Judiciary who appear to have relinquished their powers and morphed into one branch of government known as the Executive Branch. If the congressional and judiciary branches of government fail in their fiduciary duty to exercise their powers and prevent the shredding of the U.S. Constitution then the Ruleof Checks and Balances is meaningless, as well. After all, they do seem to have stepped aside and granted the executive branch carte blanc rights to absolute power and allowed Obama to rule the nation without Congress by Executive Order.
We The People are quite aware that Article II has been rendered meaningless by the Justice Department, the Congress, and the Executive Branch. Well then, how is that happening in America? Justice Thomas stated at a hearing, the Justices intentionally “avoid” Article II! He also inferred that a person no longer has to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be president – not anymore – which left questions as to what Justice Thomas knew about the 2008 elections and Obama’s eligibility. The legal definitionof a U.S. Natural Born or U.S. Native born Citizen has been defined for 235 years until 2008 as written in the book titled, the “Law of Nations, and is the book which U.S. justices and congress define laws. The Law of Nations is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution and the Law of Nations is used by Law Professors for definition.
In other words, isn’t it true that a foreign-born baby, or a baby born toone foreign-born parent, even if one parent is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, is not eligible to be a U.S. Presidentbecause they do not meet the requirement of beinga U.S. Natural Born Citizen as required by Article II? Even foreign nations require the same unless there is a coup d’etat in the works. An American can’t go to the Middle East and apply to be the King of Saudi Arabia or the President of Iran. Obama may not be eligible to be the president of Africa because Obama inherited from his father, his birth right as Subject of Britain. An American can’t go to Great Britain and apply to be King of the UK. But, maybe Obama’s chances would be greater if he requested to be Knighted by the British Queen, than by the leaders of Africa, based on his being a Subject of Great Britain. After all, Obama has a complicated and complex background and he has claims of being white, Irish, Black, African, Kenyan, a British Subject, Muslim, Christian, U.S. Natural Born Citizen born in Hawaii, a prominent lawyer, law professor, community organizer, as well as an adopted son of Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro, where he lived and studied in Indonesia, as stated he is “one of them.” Barry Soetoro became an Indonesia Citizen upon adoption. Barry or Obama’s Kenyan grandma stated she was present when he was born in a Kenyan hospital.
There are documents relating to Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate posted by the Kenyan Parliament which were published in the Kenyan Parliamentary records as they were concerned about Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship at the time he was elected US President. The record stated that Obama was born in Kenya and the he is a Citizen of Kenya and a Subject of Great Britain, published back in 2008. The Parliament stated in the documents that they were surprised that America must not require that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be eligible to be an elected U.S. President.
On the other hand, babies born to foreigners on U.S. soil are referred to as inhabitants or foreigners and upon being legalized by immigration are known as naturalized citizens, but they can’t inherit the same birth rights of the U.S. natural-born and U.S. native-born children of the U.S. Natural or Native born fathers which are passed down from generation to generation making only the U.S. Natural Born Citizen eligible to become a U.S. President. Since 2008, Obama has stated a myriad of times on television and in writing that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., is a native-born Kenyan and a subject of Britain as well as an African and a Muslim. Even the Prime Minister of Kenya stated Obama was born in Kenya. After all, anyone with common sense realizes that it doesn’t make any sense and it’s definitely not logical or economically sound for any responsible citizen to spend $1,000,000 plus with the intent of concealing a $35 certified copy of a birth certificate from federal judges.
At the time of Obama’s alleged dad’s birth, Kenya was a British Colony, under the rule of the United Kingdom, where his Native born father, was born as a British subject governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 making his biological children, including Barack Hussein Obama, jr., subjects of Great Britain at birth by passing down his birthright to his son. The British Nationality Act of 1948 (part II, Section 5) states that subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after commencement of this act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of his birth. Again, Obama inherited his birthright from his foreign-born Kenyan-Muslim father and Subject of Great Britain. So it matters not where Obama was born – Kenya or Hawaii – except for truth – the fact is that he has a foreign-born father which renders him a Subject of Great Britain and making him ineligible by U.S. Constitutional law, Article II, which requires a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen even if he was born in Hawaii as he claims. It doesn’t even matter if his mother was a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. Even former Ca. Governor Schwarzenegger stated that he can’t be a U.S. President because his parents were born in Europe. Congressman Rubio stated he can’t run for U.S. President because one or both of his parents weren’t U.S. Natural Born Citizens. So, how is it that congress doesn’t recall the definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen as of 2008?
Indonesian Adoption: We The People also have read that his mother married Lolo Soetoro and lived in Indonesia with Obama jr. with the stepfather. Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama by marriage making Obama, a minor child, an Indonesian citizen, which allowed Obama to attend a madrassa, which he calls a Catholic school, but the teachers can’t teach Christianity or Catholicism on Muslim soil, but are required to teach Islamic studies in Indonesia. The intense memorization of the Koran in a Madrassa makes a big difference of what a child is taught in Muslim nations and where his deep rooted beliefs, religion, and ideologies are seeded. He also admits that his stepfather changed Obama’s name to Barry Soetoro. Research of Indonesian citizenship documentation reads that Indonesia didn’t recognize dual citizenship at the time Obama and his mom lived in Indonesia nor did the U.S. recognize dual citizenship, so upon Obama’s returning to the U.S. as an adult, he would be required to repatriate himself, but did he do that? And even if he did repatriate himself then why doesn’t he produce his immigration papers as a naturalized citizen based on the fact his dad is foreign-born? And, how is it that he allegedly received foreign student loans since one must be foreign-born to receive foreign student loans as questioned by constitutional lawyers?
The eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq, on or about 2008, was denied by Justice Roberts. I wrote aletter to Justice Roberts and each U.S. Justice in support of Berg’s eligibility lawsuit stating that if they didn’t hear Berg’s lawsuit and resolve eligibility as required by Article II that there could be a very bad case precedent set in 2012 which could cause anti-American foreigners, usurpers, and illegals to challenge Article II in the courts using Obama’s 2008 vetting case as a legal basis. How then without properly identifying a U.S. President or correcting the record legally for historical and public record are his Executive Orders considered constitutional and legal? Perhaps, the Congress and Justices do not want to admit their failure to vet a candidate properly, but the problem won’t disappear like a rabbit in a hat.
Genius is the word that should be used when referring to our Forefathers, for they understood that the day would come when federal public servants and Wall Street would fail in their fiduciary duty to their country and citizens. They knew that the day might come when federal lawmakers might attempt to avoid, re-write, ignore, manipulate, shred, and deny U.S.citizens freedom and liberty and even attempt to replace U.S. Constitutional Laws with a new set of restructured laws that deny every freedom and liberty under the guise of health care or under the guise of protecting citizens from terrorism. Freedom and Liberty has been established and guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and provides specific rights, i.e., due process of law, sovereignty, right to choose, and the right to life, with the intent of preventing tyranny.
Again, never forget the legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen which is required with the specific intent of preserving the Republic for future generations of U.S. Natural Born Citizens. Article II is required in order to prevent a foreigner from usurping office, whose passions lie elsewhere and whose intent could risk the safety of our nation. Article II is required to be followed by law because a U.S. President must“Love” his country and “love” the Natural Born Citizens; he must “desire” to preserve the laws, traditions, and culture passed down to biological children from their U.S. Natural Born Fathers, therefore preserve our nation’s culture.
Article II is the most important law of all! Our forefathers created Article II to preserve Western Culture for future generations, so a foreigner cannot usurp the laws and steal a nation or pilfer its wealth to be used for agendas other than to benefit the American people. Article II provides security that a U.S. Natural Born U.S. President inherits their birthright to become a candidate and be elected as a U.S. President, which is a birth right passed down through generations, from their natural-born fathers. Obama’s father didn’t have the U.S. natural-born birth right to pass down to Obama, therefore, he should step down and allow a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to exercise his or her birth right as a U.S. President. Have U.S. Natural Born Citizens been denied their birthright to be a U.S. Natural Born President?
Again, it’s important to understand that Article II doesn’t allow for compromise, but requires that a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born or Native born Citizen. The Forefathers intentionally inserted the Law of Nations into the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence so generations of Americans could always refer to the legal definition of constitutional law. An unvested man, who concealed his identity using Executive Orders with the intent to by-pass Article II after swearing an oath to uphold Article II, shouldn’t be allowed to remain a mystery from the people or supported by congress and the judiciary. If that is the case, then the congress and judiciary must take the responsibility if our nation is injured as their gross negligence and failure to uphold Article II , which is causing grave doubt and distrust, in the minds of the U.S. citizens, even around the world.
A majority of Americans fear that their nation could be changed and their lives jeopardized by the failure of public servants to perform their fiduciary duty according to their sworn oaths. Remember, Khrushchev said that a nation can be taken down without dropping one bomb, but most recently, the Russians have stated that the Americans are stupid for not vetting a U.S. President.
In fact, Eric Holder made a very disturbing statement at a college with a majority of Blacks in attendance when he stated, Americans will be polarized! Within 10-15 years, the face of America will be changed. He was called out on such a statement and made to apologize.
Article II requires a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be a U.S. President, so our democratic Republic can’t be overthrown by foreigners, period.
Never think lightly of the GENIUS of great men, our Forefathers, who understood tyranny, yet, they provided brilliant laws which allow Americans a guaranteed right and a duty to resist peacefully, or even exercise force in some cases, against oppressive laws if the citizens fear their government is threatening the safety of its citizens and their families, property, or country, clearly written into U.S. constitution and stated laws. Remember, under the Clinton administration, there were two attacks by our government against American citizens at WACO and at Ruby Ridge. American men, women, and children, were killed on U.S. soil versus upholding Article IV and exercising the rights of the citizens to access due process of law.
For example, in the 1970s, Chile was a democratic government with a democratic leader. Henry Kissinger mentors U.S. candidates and presidents such as Nixon, Ford, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Palin, and McCain. Kissinger and Nixon were behind the veil when Chile’s government was overthrown and the lives of the Chilean citizens changed over night. The citizens of Chile were shocked when the coup d’etatbegan bombing their city and firing upon innocent citizens. The citizens were taken over by tyrannical militants and they lost their freedom and liberty over night. Free enterprise was devastated as military tanks rolled in rendering all innocent citizens helpless. The frightened and abused citizens were beaten, rounded up and jailed, tortured, killed, separated from their loved ones, and forced to pay extremely high taxes as a tyrant named Pinochet was ushered in to rule the people with an iron fist After he established his tyrannical government, he released the remaining citizens from prison. Those who opposed the government’s agendas were arrested and indefinitely detained or executed. How then do we allow a public servant/s to devalue the worth of human life if the congress places no value upon the lives of its own citizens and views people as “non-persons” or enemies of the state? In fact, millions of future citizens of a nation can be wiped out by government mandated abortions! In fact, the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, addresses abortions and can be reviewed on-line at amazon or by clicking on http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Thus, it is important to wonder why Congress and law enforcement have skipped over the fact that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro attempted to insert an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill in 2008 prior to elections, an amendment that would eliminate the words, U.S. NaturalBorn Citizen, from Article II, since Bill Clinton had inferred that Obama is not a citizen, as well as, McCain, during the presidential campaign of 2008? Such a move would have let Obama off the hook from being prosecuted for Treason and a foreign enemy as far as eligibility goes or the Kenyan government believing Americansdidn’t care about Article II’s requirements back in 2008.
Why would Senator Hillary Clinton, running for the same office in the same election, even want to help Obama, her competitor when she worked so hard to be the First Female President of the USA, secretly assist Obama in attempting to remove the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from Article II of the U.S. Constitution before the 2008 elections?
Why would there be allegations that Senator Pelosi altered the wording before signing the Certification involving Obama’s vetting records?
Why would Obama’s Kenyan Grandmother and the Kenyan Prime Minister and recently, his brother Malik post Obama’s Kenyan Birth Certificate and call Obama, a “fraud, dishonest, and a con.” Obama’s Bio was published in a magazine stating he was born in Kenya and he stated he wasn’t born in America in a speech that was taped on video. The on-line U.S. Birth Certificates posted by Obama and/or the White House as well as the Kenyan newspapers, and according to forensics, experts, and law enforcers is a forgery.
In conclusion, based upon the knowledge admitted by Obama that his biological Kenyan father born as a subject of Britain, Barack Hussein Obama sr – and only his mom being a U.S. natural-born citizen – baffles the average mind of how congress and the judiciary, MSM, and the entire federal government duped the American people. The Democrats and Rinos and MSM continue to justify that Obama aka Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian National, qualified to be elected as a U.S. President in 2008, and 2012 as required by Article II and as defined by “The Law of Nations,” and US laws. Isn’t that infiltration into the U.S. government by consent? The U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Congress have this information at their finger tips and they ignored it and dismissed the lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg prior to the inauguration of 2009. Shouldn’t the admitted fact from Obama’s own writings and words sharing that Obama’s Kenyan and generational Muslim father is a foreign-born Kenyan and a British subject making Obama a British subject at birth in 1961 by Birthright be considered more than enough reason to hold court hearings?
Why did Obama insert an amendment into an exiting Presidential Directive with the intent of concealing his credentials and identity from Americans which he immediately enacted after swearing an oath to uphold Article II. His self-serving and self-protection amendment provides precise instructions which state that only by his consent or the advice of Eric Holder can his identity be released for public scrutiny, even to congress, or law enforcement prohibiting true identification should congress or law enforcement choose to conduct hearings relating to his eligibility and prove or disprove the challenge as to whether or not Obama aka Barry met the eligibility requirements of Article II established by the U.S. Constitution. And, that’s why the Kenyan citizens interviewed on tape and the Kenyan Parliament and his Kenyan Parliament and the Kenyan leaders such as Gadaffi who called Obama, “my son” or “our son” couldn’t believe as they stated that the American people elected a Kenyan for U.S. President.
Obviously, it is important that the American people remember they are the government, and this federal regime has trampled on “limited government” – trampled on the laws of the land. Americans have constitutional laws allowing them to exercise and resist peacefully against unconstitutional or rigged elections, illegal donations from foreign sources; improper vetting procedures; and unconstitutional laws by petitioning, emailing, calling, writing, changing laws, researching, and filing Grievances with the U.S. Congress. Shouldn’t congress suspend Obama’s job as president and his Executive Orders until they complete an investigative hearing and determine his eligibility? It’s only when the congress exercises their authority to certify the truth on public record that U.S. Natural Born Americans will feel vindicated from being called names, such as “birthers” for attempting to preserve the nation’s Western laws and culture for future and current generations of U.S. Natural Born kids, grandkids, and future generations.
If it is wrong to request that Congress uphold Article II then how is it right for them to remain as lawmakers, for if that is the case, should they refuse to uphold constitutional law and perform their fiduciary duty – have they now become law breakers? Do they not desire to preserve the U.S. Constitution as well as the Republic, Western culture, Judeo-Christian roots and traditions, the economy; the preservation of freedom and liberty, the preservation of due process of law, the preservation of the right to life, so future U.S. Natural Born Citizens can inherit the same birthrights for which they are entitled, not foreigners who immigrate into the U.S., but U.S. Natural Born citizens able to fulfill their duty if they choose to become a U.S. Natural Born President? But if that Birthright is stolen by a usurper aka a foreign immigrant than the U.S. Natural Born Citizen is denied their inheritance of their U.S. Natural Born birth right and their legal right – should they so choose – to become a U.S. Natural Born President of the United States of America – a most honorable position to embrace and cherish.
It’s a mystery as to why the 111th and 112th Congress and the U.S. Justices would fail to uphold Article II, but it is the most important law established by our Forefathers as well as Article IV which provides to every individual their right to exercise due process of law. There’s a statement I wrote in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, “Without due process of law, there is nothing. Nothing but tyranny.”
On or about 2001 and 2008,and most recently, Obama stated that his goal was to “disarm” Americans on Meet the Press about 2008. (He launched Fast & Furious in 2009 with $10,000,000 of stimulus money promised for jobs). Obama stated in 2001 and 2008 and in 2011 that congress and the constitution are “meaningless.” About 2001 and 2008, he stated that at the “Constitution is nothing more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] which need to be changed,” which may have been scrubbed on the internet. The statements of his father being foreign-born and the myriad of other allegations should be enough for congress to suspend Obama’s presidency until the congress, and senate can sort out the truth based upon constitutional law. It would appear that whenever questions arise relating to eligibility of a public servant’s qualification, then the laws he has implemented shouldn’t be rubber stamped and enforced, until the truth is certified and made public. It is time to Ring the liberty Bell</strong>! In fact, it’s the fiduciary duty of the U.S. Congress, Senate, and Justices to uphold their sworn oaths and uphold the constitution, including Article II. U.S. federal public servants should represent the will of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and U.S. Native Born Americans in exchange for their jobs and wages. The failure of these public servants to acknowledge the Grievances of the American people shall only cause their cries to ring out louder until the winds stop blowing in an ugly direction. ***(This article may be shared but not Plagiarised by a Third Party – all (C) rights reserved by the writer, Rose Colombo)
Rose Colombo has proposed laws as the Founder, Women Fight Back, a grassroots movement she formed in 1989 that spread in the news like wildfire. She proposed laws, which were implemented, related to Family Law and Joint Custody. As an invited speaker, shes addressed the Ca. Senate, Justice Department, Criminal Planning providing recommendation related to Family Law as an Advocate, Invited Guest of the Granada Forum, L.A. Press Speaker’s Bureau (standing ovation); Created and Hosted: The Pro-Justice Summit. She’s been a public speaker at local Chambers of Commerce, Pre-Paid Legal Services, and community groups. She’s received a myriad of media awards for her writings on injustices including a local newspaper column she created and wrote for two years, “One-Woman’s Opinion.”
Rose Colombo author of 2 Award-Winning and 5 Star Review Books: “Fight BackLegal Abuse,”and “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks, and Radicals” a political satire and orwellian adventure story about Obamasaurus for any age. Read Complimentary pages at – http://www.amazon.com
Follow Rose on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and Social Media – Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be legal, political, financial, or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. visit my website for bio, book, photo, videos, awards – www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder
Did Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?
In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about March 2012. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly. Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?
Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants; but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future. Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?
Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law. For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter? The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive. So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty? Also, the attacks on Libya, in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.
Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies? Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority? Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?
Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution. He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States
Rep. Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree. Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal basis.” He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”
Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act. He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.
Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.” He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you. If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.
Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.” Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis. Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here. We want to build an international support.
Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat. Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by Panetta’s statements.
Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.
So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress? Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution. It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.
In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?
The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitutionand Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175). It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it. They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere. For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion. I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another. I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.” In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.
Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers? How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends. How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place? At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.
Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation. How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution? For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder, without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price. If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?
Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or 2 men the right to knight themselves with absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen? Obama called the attack on Libya, a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?
In conclusion, if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country. If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern, it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.
Furthermore, if the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion? America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?
How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA? By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial? Even a guilty person should be given a trial! In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now. The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds. The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only. By the way, how is that even legal in America? It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws. Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages! Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Click the like button and leave a comment, please. You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit Disclaimer: Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com