Which Constitutional Authority is Obama; Congress Using to Exempt Themselves; Foreigners, Unions, Refugees,Illegals from Paying Up Front for ObamaCare?

Take Back America!
Take Back America!

Rose Colombo – Rev. 4/11/2012, 3/30/2012 (C)

“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:  Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”

Wake up, America!  How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land?  It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a  restructured set of laws replacing  freedom and liberty, in my opinion.  ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive  mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!

In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must not go down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”

After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers.  A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a  baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period!  There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress. 

So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval?  Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself  – the authority to conceal his identity from the government  – and from the public.  It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval.  When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land?  This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval?  Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?

Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress  must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law?  This makes it very  difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing  Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge,  Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land  and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.

The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring  that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent  foreign and anti-American usurpers  from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President.  It is the birthright of every U.S.  Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected.  The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions,  and for the preservation of  Western Civilization so  future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.   

For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America.  He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions.  Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority. 

A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions.  Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education.  All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens. 

A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.” 

Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation?  It appears to me that the American people should be  very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially  Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law.  How is that?

Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections.  The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place.  In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.

Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit.  On the day of the inauguration about January 2009,  Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech.  Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV.  A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.

But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II,  the question remains if he intended  to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing   presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal?  Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself  the authority to conceal his identification records  from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented  in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals?  So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?  

Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder.  But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical?  After all,  Article II requires identification of  the public servant and proof  that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.      

On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws.  Thus, how is an  amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to  alter Article II to the 111th Congress and  seek Congressional approval?       

So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill,  to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record.  The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.    

 Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an  ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses.  After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor.  The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections.  And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual.   After the elections of 2008,  published records from the  Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record.  If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the  ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information. 

As I stated, this begs the question of  why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s  U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II  be considered  an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?   

These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth.  And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President.  Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.  

How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens.  ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved.  The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims,  SEIU union members,  possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals.  So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty,  then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?

In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.

ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation.  Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people  refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off  taxes of the hard working American citizens.  ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.

Therefore, I have three questions:  1)  How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and  U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or  lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress?  2)  How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress  or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records  for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people;  3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves  from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me  as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare?  (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices.  She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices.  Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com  – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –

Obamacare: Is it a Ponzi Scheme, Patient Dumping, Paying for Your Own Demise?

Americans Own The Bill of Rights!
Americans Own The Bill of Rights!

Rose Colombo, award-winning author, Legal Advocate, Activist, and Coach, created the question that rang out across the nation in 2009, when she posed the question, “How is the Obamacare “Mandate”  Constitutional or legal?  She sent the question to every congressional member in her worldwide Blog, “Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal” and her question was read with her name on the congressional floor and debated in the Supreme Court.  (pub (c). 4/6/2012, rev 3/29/2012, rev 4/27/2013, 6/21/2013), rev. 10/8/2013

The End Times are Upon the World!  That was the cry of many, but the Mayans may not have been stating that December 12, 2012 was the end of the world, but signaling that it’s the beginning of the end under the Obama regime working within the federal government’s intent to “fundamentally transform ” America taking American to a dangerous crossroad leaving Americans vulnerable to unconstitutional laws that could lead to the death of millions of Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Citizen!

The Obama regime  appears to be preparing to implement police states and approving unconstitutional and immoral laws upon the American people.  In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, asked the question if the federal government’s next mandate is to order that all Americans buy Broccoli, a consumer product or elect a dog for U.S. President if the vetting laws and Identification laws aren’t required!

The US Supreme Court Justices debated the question of the “mandate” which I created and sent to every Congressman, blogged worldwide, and ended up read on the congressional floor with my name.  The 112th Congress was negligent and appeared derelict in their duty which requires that they read and study each law in-depth, but they approved 2700 pages of unread laws which shocked the nation and rubber stamped it in favor of Obama when they took bribes for votes!

The duties of a U.S. President are limited, yet this non-vetted and unidentified president has been granted absolute powers to declare the Congress and the Constitution basically as meaningless and stated that he could do whatever he wants and no one can stop him because he has a phone and a pen and he’s the Commander-in-Chief, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief of the American people; in fact, it is the American people who are his Commander-in-Chief and who must take back the pen and the phone before more Americans die on the battlefield, not just the foreign battlefield, but the domestic battlefield on U.S. soil as declared by Obama and Congress.

In an unprecedented announcement, Speaker Pelosi announced that Congress approved the unread mandates, regulations, taxes, and punishments included in Obamacare without performing their duty and studying each law, but she declared Americans would like it after it’s approved so they can find out what’s in it sort of like a Jack in the Box affect, only Americans found out that it was more like “Chuckie” jumping out and attacking and shredding the U.S. Constitution with his knife.

Today, Obama and Congress shamelessly exempt themselves without any constitutional authority from signing up, paying up, and from liability or punishment for passing the unread Obamacare and approving it with a rubber stamp!  They discriminate against Americans who aren’t in their inner circle as well as Muslims, Refugees from the Middle East, Donors, Bundlers, SEIU and others.

After the Obamacare red carpet was stained with a series of serious glitches and billions are being spent to try to fix something that can’t be fixed, the truth is that Americans are losing their existing health care coverage and suffering because they can’t access their doctors or treatments or else they’re treatments and medications are unaffordable or the deductibles and premiums are unaffordable, so now there is equality!  Not only do illegals, and the Muslims and all those who didn’t have health care prior to Obamacare was implement, it’s a fact that Americans will also be without health care as more hospitals close their doors and retreat to becoming an Urgent Care facility.  And, that’s not to mention the millions of jobs that will be lost because of Obamacare!  Obamacare is actually making more Americans very sick!

Wake Up, Americans!  Are the majority of Americans aware that former impeached President Bill Clinton ordered a study on “Human Capital?” Recently, Bill Clinton was in the news alluding that Americans will like Communism. Hillary Clinton made international news during the congressional hearings when she was questioned about her friend, who was the U.S. Ambassador, and 3 murdered military men killed by terrorist attacks at Benghazi and she angrily replied, “What difference does it make?” Also, President Obama hit the news when asked about murdered American soldiers and the US Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and he casually remarked that they were mere “bumps in the road.”

Human Capital is the study of individuals and allows the federal government to determine the value or lack of value of each human being based upon gender, age, health, possibly religion, politics, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, and IQ or talents versus the lack of worth to the federal government and the cost to the government, i.e., an individuals cost for health care treatments,  food, housing, and education.  This is a Orwellian 1984 agenda.  It represents a Nazi type of agenda with the intent of creating collectivism as well as a means of reducing the population and creating a Master Slave mentality. This is also the dream of creating the Master Race. Yet, the American people have been cheering on the Obama’s and the Clinton’s and support and defend their dream of a New World Order demanding every individual march to the drum beat and comply or else be punished.

Furthermore, past and current congressional members failed to perform  their fiduciary duty as required by the 14th Amendment and their sworn oaths and job duties that require each member to read and study each law in-depth!  They not only failed to study each law in-depth and assure the American people that each  law, mandate, regulation, punishment, tax, and penalty are written in accordance with the US Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans and reflect the best interest of the American people.  They failed or refused to read  2700 pages of laws, which in my opinion, appear to be a serious dereliction of duty.  But, which public servant working in the taxpayer-funded  federal government cares about the US Constitution?  After all, it is the non-vetted President Obama who stated more than once that the U.S. Constitution is flawed and that it is “meaningless?” He stated, “The Constitution is a mere charter of negative [liberties] that need to be changed.”

Hypocrites!  Too many members of the White House and Congress are hypocrites and they appear to be lawmakers who have turned into law breakers as they hold themselves above the laws which they mandate for the American people and exempt themselves from the laws.  Laws are written for criminals as law-abiding citizens don’t violate the laws.  Criminals exempt themselves from the law and hold themselves above the law, but law-abiding citizens follow the Rule of Law and public servants swear to uphold U.S. Constitutional law.

Should the American people not ask which constitutional authority is the White House and Congress applying that  grants these public servants the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they mandate as constitutional law on U.S. soil, even though they admit that the laws are unread and possibly unconstitutional and illegal?  After all, if they weren’t read, how would they know what’s in them when they rubber stamped them “approved.”  Perhaps, it would have been wiser to rubber stamp Obamacare, “D.O.A.,” dead on arrival.

Consequently, it’s amazing to me that the American people haven’t bothered to ask how unread and unconstitutional laws can be legal on U.S. soil or how people can be punished on U.S. soil for failing to comply with unread or unconstitutional laws?  The fact that they are unread should render them unconstitutional on their face!  This problem should raise the question under which constitutional law is Obama and Congress applying that provides them the authority to write discriminatory constitutional laws and grants them the authority to exempt people who they favor or where there are huge conflicts of interest wuch as bundlers, donors, and supporters?

If Obamacare is such a great improvement to the healthcare industry then why would the Obama’s and Sebelius, Biden, and congressional members want to exempt themselves from complying with Obamacare?  This problem begs the question if they realize that Page 107 of Obamacare includes making Americans slaves of the Muslim immigrants and refugees living in the USA by referring to Americans on this page as Dhimmis?  If you don’t know what a Dhimmi is then you should read up because from my research it means “slave.”  In other words, the American people must comply and pay up for their housing, food, and health care.  Could this be one of the key reasons why Obama is so adamant about forcing Obamacare upon the American people?  

Another key reason for Obamacare appears to be depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and he approved of Infanticide of U.S. Natural Born Citizens while he was a senator which means babies that are born after abortion are left to die.  In fact, senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act with the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, and others, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires that Americans pick up the tab to kill these babies with abortion scissors in the USA and around the world!  This flies against the moral majority and Christians and Catholics who are being wiped out by terrorists around the world!  This Global Poverty Act that Obama signed as an Executive Order about January 2009 diminished the constitutional Right-to-Life and it reflects a depopulation program similar to that of the U.N. Agenda 21.  

Obamacare or the ACA or [un]Affordable Care Act is not so affordable.  In fact, most people can’t afford to sign up or comply because he’s increased their Health Care Premiums by 40% to 100% depending upon the plan.  It’s been reported in the news that about three million Americans are not without health care insurance because of Obamacare as their insurance companies cancelled their plans.  In fact, Obamacare robs from Peter to pay Paul.  Peter is Medicare and is being robbed by Obama to pay for Obamacare which diminished the services for seniors, veterans, disabled, and the very sick who rely on Medicare.

If Obamacare is such an outstanding and legal benefit being implemented as a national takeover of the healthcare industry by the federal government then why must the federal government mandate excessive taxation, excessive penalties, excessive punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits those excesses?   If  Obamacare is so wonderful then why are doctors retiring early and expressing their disdain for Obamacare?  And,  why are businesses closing down and laying off American employees or reducing their work hours which reduces productivity because of Obamacare?  This will increase the cost of consumer products to Americans because businesses will be forced to pay higher premiums for their part-time employees including illegal citizens!

Justice Scalia questioned if Obama, who implemented the umbrella law known as  ObamaCare, could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off  base at all!  After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat!  And Mayor Bloomberg is pushing what and how much Americans can drink.  And, Monsinto, oops, I mean Monsanto, is pushing GMO’s on the world and fighting against labeling their products.  Michelle Obama is promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks.  The Redistribution program which includes the snack and spy program is described in my latest political satire on how Obamacare and Redistribution of wealth could devastate a free Judeo-Christian Nation that leaves the reader with thought-provoking messages on these agendas and it’s titled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” available at amazon.com

Therefore, Obama is selling snake oil to the American people.  His health care is more about death care because his program includes death panels, euthanasia, enslavement to foreigners and donors, and depopulation through same-sex agendas and mandated abortions.  His committee of 15 will determine who lives and who dies based upon their evaluation of each individual as human capital who will be no more than a commodity of value or little value to the federal government.  As I stated, if Obamacare is such a wonderful health care program then Obama and Biden, Sebelius, senators Reid, Pelosi, and the entire Congress should be the first to sign up, and comply with their own laws, otherwise they are law breakers and holding themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, but are failing to follow the Rule of Law which they swore to do.

How then are the American people not rising up and demanding that Congress Repeal and stop the funding before the tsunami hits that is coming upon U.S. citizens in January 2014?   How is it that Obama, Biden, and Congress are determined to destroy the greatest health care industry in the world and force Americans into the worst HMO system that they could ever imagine?  Obama and his regime are forcing Americans  to pay up front against their will for mandated abortions and death panels or else be punished?  Isn’t that like paying for your own demise and the demise of your family, friends, unborn babies, and fellow Americans and helping make the U.S. Natural Born Citizen extinct?   How is it that Americans can’t see this as a silent genocide without war or guns on what Obama and congress now refer to as a battlefield?  Does it not appear that the federal government is at war with America and Americans?

Should the American citizens not ask why do we need a committee of 15 approved by Obama to determine if they will send Americans to early end of life counseling and pull the plug on grandma or the very sick or veterans?  Is this program intended to save money for the federal government so foreign immigrants and illegals and Refugees can move into the USA and access food, housing, and Obamacare without paying up, because it will be paid  on the backs of US taxpayers and create a nation of federal government works vs. a nation of citizens on entitlement programs dependent upon the federal government to take care of them since their focus has been on destroying jobs, not creating jobs!

Obviously, Americans will be mere chattel used as commodities and as “human capital” while Obama golf’s at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day to the U.S. taxpayers.   The Obama Muslim Brotherhood and non-vetted czars and Congress will allow this committee of 15 to determine who will be euthanized, denied or rationed health care services based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government. Unless the law has been amended, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply and pay up front for Obamacare could spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty, so many will never get a monopoly card to get out of jail.

In fact, the federal government grants to themselves the right to raid and confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the federal government under Obamacare.  Obama has enacted a NSA Massive Surveillance Program recently  exposed by Whistleblower named Edward Snowden who most believe to be a U.S. hero.  It’s my opinion that the massive set of  Obamacare laws replaces the Constitution of the United States and denies Freedom, Liberty, and Rights.

Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare.  So, why did I write the first blog in 2009 warning the nation and Congress – “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:

1.  How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legally and constitutionally moved forward to hear the unread  2700 pages without review, debate or congressional study prior to hitting the U.S. Supreme Court.  Shockingly, the majority of Supreme Court Justices approved the unconstitutional ObamaCare  and Justice Robert nailed the last nail into the coffin that would end the best health care system in the world.

Consequently, Justice Elena Kagan refused to Recuse herself from the Obamacare case even though there were documented reports related to her long time association with student Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.  After Harvard received a $20M donation from the Saudi Prince and Obama was named President of the Harvard Law Review, it’s reported that Kagan worked on a project to help create an Islamic Studies program at Harvard.  Thereafter, it’s reported that Senator Obama appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and she worked on Obamacare and favored it and represented him in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Thereafter, he appointed her as a U.S. Justice right before the Obamacare case was to be decided.

upreme Court while Solicitor General according to the records reported in the news.    As a result, the majority of Americans requested that Justice Kagan remove herself from voting on Obamacare, but she refused and Justice Roberts refused to do so. There are many reports of the long time favorable association Kagan and Obama since he attended Harvard when she was Dean Kagan.  In fact, the news posted a video that documented a special event when Dean Kagan held a special even for Senator Obama and she stated he was the most brilliant student to ever attend Harvard.

After Obama was elected as a non-vetted U.S. President, he appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him  in an eligibility case while she was Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. which is considered unethical according to the Code of Ethics.  Also, after Obama took office as an non-vetted U.S. President, Kagan worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General.  Obama then nominated Kagan for the position of U.S. Justice.  And, the Conflict of Interest is that these behaviors give the appearance of grave Conflicts of Interest as she was elevated thereafter to that of U.S. Justice right before Obamacare was to be voted upon.  This behavior is similar to being a guest in Las Vegas by the CEO and Pit Boss of a luxurious casino.  You put your money on the table, but the dice are stacked against you without your knowledge and you lose the shirt on your back.  These issues casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court.  It will take generations if at all possible to restore trust in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices.

2.  Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to “avoid”  Article II of the U.S. Constitution?  The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing .  It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly non-vetted president who admits that his father is  foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Great Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject.  A U.S. Natural Born Citizen cannot have a foreign born parent even if born on U.S. soil for that makes him a “naturalized citizen,” but not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.”

The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of  Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question and has been the resource used by congress for 237 years.

3.  Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,700 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved?  After all, it is the fiduciary duty required by the 14th Amendment of  the U.S. Constitution and their duty to the American people that  the U.S. Congress  read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before the laws are debated in the Supreme Court.

4.  Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?

5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?

6.  Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy?  How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress to approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and  donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign?  How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?

7.  Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya.  So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news  known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?

8.  Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law, but then how is it that they are writing laws which are on federal land, not located on the soil of the USA?  Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?

9.  Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earnings after taxes – earnings are private property – so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings aka private property to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections which the government may or may not provide with complete immunity?

Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty.  Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?”  In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care.  Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution,  known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.

So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front money scheme for Obamacare be paid  up-front into the government’s fund without accountability as they know nothing, see nothing, and hear nothing when they are caught at wrong doing, and stand on the 5th and refuse to answer the questions as to what happened to the money? 

How does it not border on extortion when law-abiding Americans have an imaginary gun placed to their heads by government thugs telling them to pay-up-front with their own earnings, even if they don’t want the consumer product, because consumer products are paid with private property aka personal earnings then taxes are paid.  Why are Americans being forced  under the threat of fear or punishment to pay up for a consumer product they don’t want and may never receive as the government retains the right to deny or ration said services?

Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Social Security with the promise of saving the taxpayers money for retirement by forced taxation from personal earnings?  Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than collecting taxes for Medicare and after they divert the money from Medicare, they tell the taxpayers, too bad, we’re denying or cutting services to seniors?  Could Obamacare become the a bigger Ponzi scheme than the Redistribution of Wealth?  Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Patient Dumping at University Hospital for big profits and bonuses by the staff?  Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than the fraud of the Housing Crisis implemented by Congress and Bankers?  Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than promising 350,000 infrastructure jobs in exchange for billions of dollars?  Could Obamacare be a bigger Ponzi scheme than Solyndra whose bundler owner took the taxpayers money then gave himself and partner big bonuses and wages and bankrupted?  Could Obamacare be the biggest Ponzi Scheme to make and create big taxes for depopulation programs and to create big profits for politicians, banksters, and Wall Street?

Is This THE KEY TO ENSLAVE US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS?  Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into a  private enterprise  as a for-profit health care industry as well as acting as the federal  government with the intent to control a private corporation known as the national health care industry is unconstitutional.  So where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to take over private corporations on US soil since they operate on federal soil with “limited powers and are now acting as a dual government and free enterprise running private corporations for-profit and excessive taxes with punishment?

The  the truth is that only public servants, military, and foreign immigrants, swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, but  the U.S. Natural Born Citizens born to two legal American parents on U.S. soil, who are the only persons eligible to be a U.S. President aren’t required to swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution unless those person enter public service or the military or they are foreign immigrants granted US Naturalized  citizenship.  U.S. Natural Born Citizens Pledge Allegiance to the U.S. Flag, but that doesn’t protect them under U.S. Constitutional laws if they haven’t sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.  Perhaps, that’s the reason some judges state to U.S. Natural Born Citiznes in court that they have no constitutional rights.

Therefore, how is it that U.S. Natural Born Citizens aren’t swearing an oath by the age of 7 to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution?  So, if US Natural Born Citizens aren’t sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but public servants, military, and foreign immigrants do swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, then how does that not leave the door open on U.S. soil for public servants to enslave and indefinitely detain U.S. Natural Born Citizens if they aren’t sworn to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution which establishes their guaranteed liberty, freedom and rights?  If that’s not true then why are foreign immigrants required to swear an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in order to be guaranteed constitutional protections?  Also, how can a federal entity operating on federal land outside of the USA, District of Columbia,  which isn’t part of the United States of America, be mandating laws for the separate states in the USA since the federal government is a separate federal entity working on federal soil, granted “limited powers” known as the District of Columbia, which isn’t U.S. soil?  Shouldn’t the District of Columbia become a State of the USA so they can operate as part of the USA, so now you know why the Framers granted them “Limited Powers.” Otherwise, a foreign entity known as the federal government working on federal land would stomp their Big Foot on individuals and individual state laws. Today, the federal government has trampled on “limited powers” and are lawless and have gone dictatorial rogue?

Furthermore, Obamacare will lead to collectivism. These laws will force citizens out of the suburbs into the cities where fewer people can be more easily controlled. These laws will reduce the income of the Middle Class U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and no doubt will devastate the quality of life and the quality of the current health care industry.   So, should we not ask what is the difference between the mafia, who force people to hand over money against their will and who comply under fear and threat of losing their homes or businesses or be punished? Today, we have a non-vetted president who appears to be punish Americans and represented himself as a poor black kid with a white mother who is golfing at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day for rent and taking $100,000,000 vacations at taxpayer’s expense while denying services and jobs to Americans who pay his wages and pay up for his luxurious lifestyle!  Americans are hurting for jobs and struggling to buy gas and food as costs increase, but reckless spending is ok? Has the US Congress and the American people lost their minds and all common sense and logic? It appears that We The People have forgotten that they are the government.

How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws of “limited powers?”  If the federal government is taking over and running a private corporation, the health care industry, then shouldn’t the government be providing disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase with their personal earnings against their objections?

The Boards of Consumer Affairs require consumer disclosures, laws, policies, requirements, and regulations of consumer products sold to consumers prior to selling or providing consumer products so is the federal government above those laws, as well? Is the federal government operating as a national health care industry and obtaining business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses or Medical Malpractice Insurance?  After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people!  As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war or by guns, which is serious. Americans need to demand disclosure on their rights under Obamacare if they experience rationing or being denied services or prescriptions and their rights relating to any damages caused by such actions as well as the right to file lawsuits.

And, even more remarkable is the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, which Obamacare doesn’t favor be ordered to pay up front for services or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.

In fact, Eric Holder, stated, “Americans will be polarized.  The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years. There will be no majority race in America.”  Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Natural Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV, Due Process of Law,  and replacing it with the NDAA Law?  In my latest political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,the dinosaurs are confronted with mandated abortions as the elders fight back knowing that mandated abortions will reduce their population. This keepsake exposes the dangers of Obamacare and Redistribution of America’s wealth to anti-American nations.

In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, Obamacare is discriminatory, unconstitutional, unread, and possibly illegal. Obamacare borders on laws mandated in tyrannical Third World nations by dictators who hold themselves above the law as they punish their citizens or cause their demise.  Is there any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug on the street, who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else?’  Or a thug who says,  “Hand over your money or else?”  What if a car dealer told you, “You’re required to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all.”  What’s the difference?  (Note:  This article may be shared but please do not remove content without giving credit to the writer and please don’t plagiarize the content, much appreciated.

LIKE – COMMENT – REBOG – FOLLOW – buttons on top and bottom and welcome

Follow Rose or Rose4Justice
Twitter: Twitter@Rose4Justice
website: http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse or Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals, at amazon.com
You Tube – Rose4Justice or Rose Colombo
Radio : The Justice Club – google Freedomizer Radio – MWF 11am-12p (pdt) – 2-3p (est-usa) – Call or listen & speak out at (347) 324-3704
Radio: Constitutionally Speaking – Fridays, 4:30-6p (pdt) and 7:30p-9p (est-usa) – google Freedomizer Radio or listen online or ipods or Call & listen & speak out (347) 324-3704
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice Pinterest Google+ Tumbler DIGG

Disclaimer:  Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational and entertainment purposes only. <a