“Legal Gangsters??” (C) Coined by Rose Colombo 1991: Title Published in Newapaper Article: “Legal Gangsters??” dated April 9, 1996!

The Ring:  Symbol of Marriage or Religion?
The Ring: Symbol of Marriage or Religion?

“Legal Gangsters??” (c) a title coined in 1991 by Rose Colombo – Rose permitted the use of her title for a newspaper article as a co-author published April 9, 1996 – She wrote this latest original article pub. (c) 11/20/2011 as follows:

Legal Abuse is not new!  After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress.  The new definition of illegal is titled “inversion!”  What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress!  This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society.  They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases;  a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of  American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws.  Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent.  These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal  job descriptions.  They fly in the face of  America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form.  Every  federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty.  A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law.  A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order.  Executive Orders are not laws.

Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down.  How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own?  In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms.  The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey.

As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse.  Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.

Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s.  One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.”  A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs.  So, what was the remedy?  Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the “machine” in operation.

For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.”  Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.”  Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.”  The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law.  They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines.

Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!

An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright,  who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:

“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.”  He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved.  He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else.  Crime is crime.”

“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office.  He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance.  You are relieved of your responsibilities here.  Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’  Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.”  He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.”  He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”

Wright asked, “What are the charges?”  The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.”  And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”

Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage.  Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand.  I had no choice at all.  Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”

(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”).  On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.” ** (This article may be shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party.)

Rose Colombo’s self-help Irwin Award Winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,  and her latest political satire paralleling todays unconstitutional health care law, Obamacare, with fictional characters that reveal the Orwellian changes coming to America offer Free Reviews and Complimentary Pages at www.amazon.com

Brad Butler or Irwin Zucker at 323-461-3921.

“Insider Trading” and Double Standards! Is Wall Street in Bed with the White House? Why is it illegal for Martha, but Legal for Pelosi?

Irwin Award Winner self-help: Fight Back Legal Abuse
Irwin Award Winner self-help: Fight Back Legal Abuse

written by Rose Colombo, original l(c) pub. 11/16/2011

Occupy Wall Street made a statement whether people agree or not, at least they protested the long arm reaching from the White House into Wall Street and Wall Street reaching into the White House.  In fact,  the majority of citizens don’t believe they have the power to change the winds that have been shifting in an ugly direction as the federal government is trampling on the constitution and the “limited power” that is established by constitutional law.  Americans need to unite against the double standards that have been secretly implemented by past and current congressional members who are filling their bank accounts on the taxpayer’s time and dime!

How many Americans have looked up the definition of “Insider Trading?”  Are you aware that insider trading is illegal and that the Department of Justice went after “Martha” who made a pittance on her investment in comparison to former Speaker Pelosi, so how is that?

Insider Trading is:  “The use of material, non-public information in trading the shares of a company by a corporate insider or other person who owes a “fiduciary duty” to the company.”  How is it that the U.S. Congress no longer believes that they have a “fiduciary duty” to the American people as well as to the corporations who are seeking the approval or denial of bills before the U.S. Congress?

Furthermore, “This is the classic definition.  The Supreme Court has also approved a broader definition known as the “misappropriation theory;” the deceitful acquisition and misuse of information that property belongs to persons to whom one owes a duty.”

Obviously, members of congress are provided confidential information which could enhance their financial wealth outside of their job description if they choose to abuse their power on taxpayer’s time and work on personal “insider trading” on the job.  Americans don’t pay public servants to work on their personal Wall Street portfolios, but pay them to protect the public from unethical laws.  Federal employees are paid by the taxpayers to review corporate laws for approval or denial and determine if it is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congress as they withhold or deny or approve corporate laws presented to them for a vote based on insider trade secrets.  How is it not considered a Conflict of Interest or misappropriation as well as deceitful and unethical for congressional members to work on personal “insider trade” secrets for  personal financial gain while working as  federal employees working on the clock and paid with taxpayer dollars?  If congressional members feel it is ethical to use confidential information seeking insider trade secrets on the job than they should clock out!

On its face, it would appear that the Judicial Ethics Committee would be reviewing the Conflict of Interest, as well as the “misappropriation theory” and “deceitful acquisition or “misuse” of information which was intended for the purposes of ensuring the people were protected from big corporations on Wall Street.  So, this would explain why the American people are concerned about the U.S. Congress and Executive Office climbing in bed with Wall Street as the people line the streets protesting the double standards.

Last week, the senate voted to deny the American people the right to exercise freedom of speech on the internet by passing a bill titled “Net Neutrality.”  It is my suggestion that the American people and media wake up, because “Net Neutrality” circumvents the First Amendment and could devastate careers and corporations who promote themselves on the internet. This is a very dangerous attack against Freedom of Speech by the Obama administration.  Such a law could target people who protest against corruption between the White House and Wall Street.

Fortunately, CBS exposed a third big scandal related to the Obama administration and Congress. The U.S. Congress, past and current, passed laws stating that “insider trading” is illegal, but with deceit and non-disclosure, Congress created a double standard for congressional members making “insider trading” for congressional members legal.  Congress has written laws that circumvent the laws established for the American people by writing self-serving laws which exempt themselves from complying with the established laws mandated for all citizens and self-protecting laws which prohibit them from being prosecuted for “insider trading.”  In other words, what they implemented as “illegal” insider trading for all other citizens is “legal” for congress.

How is it legal and ethical for congressional members to re-write laws which circumvent the laws of the land, while simultaneously abusing their positions of power to write laws that allow them to violate the law with immunity, while on the job and racking up wages paid by the U.S. taxpayers?  The American people were led to believe that they voted for congressional representatives who would review corporate documents and determine what is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congressional members on taxpayer’s dime!

Under which congressional authority and fiduciary duty or job description is it that allows congress to circumvent the constitution by writing self-serving laws that protect them from complying with laws and from punishment, so they can fill their bank accounts, by creating double standards which favor congress?

So, how does congress justify their “insider trading” on the job for their personal financial gain when they are paid to protect the people from criminals who are arrested for insider trading?”  For example, a bank clerk wouldn’t be allowed to study the customer’s portfolios and discuss insider trade secrets on the job without being fired, yet there are congressional members using their time on the job paid by taxpayers for personal financial gain.

Which constitutional law or fiduciary job description did Rep. Pelosi apply that justifies her using confidential information which is the property of the government as personal information which in my opinion is unethical with the intent of using the “insider trading” secrets for her personal financial gain?  How is it okay for any employee to use information that belongs to the government or to a corporation for personal use?  In the private sector, employees would be fired.

Is it ethical for congress and the executive office to write self-serving, self-regulatory, and self-protecting laws for self-gain that provides them exemptions from compliance and exemption from punishment after mandating that all other citizens must comply with the laws which they mandate or else be punished such as  “insider trading” and “Obama care?”

Which constitutional amendment or the federal job description provides congress the authority to write approve, and enforce “insider trading” as illegal for the American people, but “legal for congressional members?

Consequently, I have determined that some congressional members believe that they have the authority to abuse their positions of power, even if it involves ethics violations and conflicts of interest to provide themselves immunity when they use “insider trading” secrets for financial gain by deeming “insider trading” as “illegal” for the citizens, but “legal” for congressional members who commit the same white-collar crime without fear of being  punished.

In conclusion, as long as the American people remain passive and accept that lawmakers can become law breakers by re-writing laws, manipulating the law, changing laws that are self-protecting from compliance and prosecution, the American people will be faced with double standards, unconstitutional laws, and a constitution that their leaders believe the words of Obama when he stated in 2001 and 2008 that the constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] that is “meaningless.”    **( This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, is the producer and host of  former cable TV and talk radio show, “Issues of the Day.”  She’s been seen and or heard on radio and TV and red in major and local newspapers.  Read Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her 2 books, Irwin Award Winner, self-help book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire depicting fictional characters with an Orwellian story paralleling today’s corrupted political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,” at www.amazon.com

Follow Rose on Twitter: Rose4Justce or visit her webiste at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com