LISTEN TAPED LIVE: Rose Colombo welcomes,Dr. Alan Keyes, as her special guest as the producer and host of “The Justice Club” at Freedomizer Radio. Dr. ALAN KEYES,graciouslyshares his knowledge and insight about Obama and the ObamaNation. Dr. Keyes is anAmerican Conservative Political Activist, author, former Diplomat, and perennial candidate for office. A doctoral graduate of Harvard University, Dr. Keyes began his diplomatic career in the United States. He received a Doctorate in Government Affairs from Harvard University before joining the Reagan administration. He’s married and he has 3 children and lives in Long Island, New York.
SORRY – THIS SHOW IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE – GO TO COLOMBO CHRONICLES LIVE – Most shows archived with experts and authors from around the world and choose your favorite author, expert, and topic and listen at your convenience. LISTEN LIVE every Wednesday, 12 noon to 1:00 p.m. pst-USA by phone (646) 564-9742 or Listen Live on worldwide internet athttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles
Books: Award-Winning Books and 5 Star Reviews: “Fight Back Legal Abuse”
CHRISTMAS BOOK FOR ANY AGE: Award-winning political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Rednecks & Radicals, political satire and Orwellian fictional adventure story on the Redistribution of Wealth and Depopulation….Check it out and order your gift at –http://www.amazon.com
“All the most horrible and disgusting aspects of the last decades of the twentieth century-the pornography, the sadism, the violence, the moral and spiritual vacuum-were already evidence there.” (Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation – Ronald Reagan 1983)
The majority of lawmakers, who have knowledge that senator Obama aka U.S. President Obama, isn’t properly vetted. The Democrats and Rinos allege that there isn’t a true definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but aren’t telling the truth, so they must have something to hide. In fact, the lawmakers who allege that the vetting laws aren’t a requirement to be a U.S. President sold that bottle of snake oil to 51% of the brainwashed zombies in America and reeks of misrepresentation. Of course, vetting means identifying every person in the USA, especially a U.S. President, a requirement under federal and state Identification laws. An unidentified person can’t lawfully work or hold public office or be paid by the taxpayers, let alone access National Security or even walk into the gates towards the White House. Is the entire Federal Government declaring that anyone can be a U.S. president without producing their certified Identification records, background checks, or produce any credentials? This is a very dangerous path for America.
All credentials are required to be vetted by the government and made transparent for public review including criminal background checks, Passports, Alias Names, Former Addresses, school records, College Degrees, Selective Service Records, Birth Certificates, Student Loans, Driver’s License, Law License, and Tax Returns. On the other hand, it appears that if a legal Americans applies to be a janitor at the White House, he must be fingerprinted, and meet all the identification requirements and background checks as an employee of the government, but not to be a U.S. President in 2008-2009? Remember, the Certification of a U.S. President requires Proper Vetting and Proof that the candidate is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. In fact, all jobs in the USA require proper identification. In the case of Obama, the lawsuits filed and investigations by law enforcement, names Sheriff Arpaio and Detective Zullo and forensic experts, allege that the U.S. Certificate of Live Birth and U.S. Birth Certificate Obama posted online and he and Michelle Obama stated on the Oprah show were legal U.S. government documents makes every natural-born American appear as if he and his colleagues do believe Americans are “stupid” and “foolish” and “easily tricked.”
The controversy over the Obama Birth Certificates is ignored by the DOJ and by the White House and by the Congress. They cared less including the Supreme Court and the Federal Judges. They left the eligibility of Barry Soetoro who stated he was born in Kenya to an audience and wrote and published it in a bio blowing in the wind. If the candidate wasn’t vetted properly then how can the Secretary of State and Speaker Nancy Pelosi sign the Certification for a non-vetted U.S. president? In fact, it’s rumored that Speaker Pelosi altered the wording on the Certification for U.S. President before signing off on Obama’s Certification of being a natural-born American. Why would they do that? Upon lawmakers having knowledge that a public servant isn’t properly vetted, it’s the duty of the lawmakers and law enforcers to properly vet the person, but if they fail to vet with such knowledge, they are willingly, consenting, and in agreement ignoring the vetting policies and identification laws required by federal employment laws, immigration laws, and Article II.
The President, Barack Hussein Obama, who isn’t vetted properly, remains a mystery to Americans, because he hasn’t been required to follow the Rule of Law or uphold Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution (to the best of my knowledge) and produce a certified U.S. Birth Certificate. Obama has been admitted into the oval office for a second term even though two television stations shockingly reported his winning percentages on national television before the elections were held. And, it just so happened coincidentally that alternative news reported that Mr.Hagel owned electronic voting machine companies (now elevated to Secretary of Defense) and the federal government has documented testimony and reports that electronic voting machines can be rigged. During his speech on November 6, 2012, Obama said something quite shocking. He said, We, the American people – will “rise and fall together.” His statement made me say, “Ouch! Should we do as the Romans, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, or learn from the history books?” (refer to the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse at amazon.com).
Should we, as Americans, inquire into the question if America is on the road to heaven or the road to hell? For example, the immoral and inappropriate television shows produced for children influence young minds negatively. The violent video games encouraging violence can cause some kids to believe this is normal. The teaching that suicide and death is good may cause some kids to follow through and try it. The promotion of euthanasia for the sick and elderly under ObamaCare should be a frightening and immoral law to Americans. Mandated Abortions worldwide promoted by Obama’s Executive Orders for the poor and U.S. Natural Born Citizens as women’s rights. Mandated Taxpayer Funded Abortions is immoral and reduces the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens as well as natural born of Third World Nations such as Kenya requiring Americans to pick up the tab worldwide to slaughter future unborn babies. The push to eliminate heterosexual lifestyles and traditional marriage under the Obama regime is a serious problem for Americans and is an attack on the foundation of a civilized nation. The disrespect for the sick and the elderly, the veterans, and the military, whose benefits are being placed at risk under Obama’s regime will cause hardship. All these issues are signs of a nation being taken into a very dark place as history has proven repeatedly. The attack on Christians, Catholics, and Jews is a very serious problem for America, Israel and Western Civilization as well as Muslims who convert, Coptic Christians, Jews, and Christians.. Only those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and lips to speak the truth, shall not be blinded by this unseen web of evil reptilian deceit that has been woven around the United States of America. How then shall we break out or is it too late? (refer to the political satire, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals at amazon.com).
In my humble opinion, I don’t believe that Americans listen closely to Obama’s words. His words have meanings, but his supporters are too busy cheering for a free phone or free cash or cars for clunkers to pay attention to what he said. Was he referring to the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire during his second term speech that should have sent chills down the spine of every loyal red, white, and blue American when he spoke those words? Is his true vision of America and that of his alleged foreign-born Kenyan father based on their belief that America is oppressive and Americans are spoiled and “revenge” is the goal? This should raise the question if his stated goal to fulfill the dreams of his real father and his own dreams, as well as his radical mentors, a part of the redistribution of America’s wealth to himself, cronies, banksters, and the Middle East in the amount of $16 Trillion, which future generations, must pay back? And, the news reported a recent lawsuit filed by a prominent law firm against public servants in positions of power who are named in an alleged $43 Trillion money laundering scandal involving America’s tax funded Tarp program.
Furthermore, Obama said we are all in this together, the illegals, and the Black slaves, but Thomas Jefferson must be rolling over in his grave, because Jefferson didn’t treat the Blacks inhumanely, who were working and living on his plantation as slaves, but he treated them as human beings. But, Obama on one hand wants to provide entitlements to illegals at taxpayer’s expense in exchange for votes, and on the other hand, possibly arrest American business owners who hire illegals even though business owners aren’t trained law enforcement agents.
Therefore, Abraham Lincoln, who adamantly opposed slavery, abolished it during the civil war. Thomas Jefferson housed, fed and clothed 600 Black slaves in their separate cabins on his estate and he taught them to read, as one of the requirements when working on his plantation. These two Founding Fathers must be rolling over in their graves since slavery and illegal immigration are violations of the federal laws and the Rule of Law and slavery has been prohibited on U.S. soil since the civil war. Where does any person see Blacks enslaved or chained on U.S. soil today? In fact, Obama, who says he’s Black, not White, is quite wealthy since the elections of 2008. And, Oprah, a Black woman, hit the news as one of the wealthiest women in the nation.
Remember, words matter and if Obama’s words lead the nation and the world to think that Americans discriminate against Blacks and treat them as slaves or discriminate against Hispanics, than that is not helpful to the image of the United States of America. Such a message doesn’t create peace among citizens, but polarize citizens. The truth is that Americans marched with Martin Luther King during the 1960s and fought for civil rights for the Black Americans. In fact, Mexico and America were allies until the federal government failed to enforce the borders. This administration has encouraged illegals to enter into the U.S. and promised the illegals entitlements so the illegals believe that they are entitled to live in America without going through legal immigration procedures. I don’t support profiling, but if the borders were secured as required by federal law then the issue of illegal immigration would diminish.
Furthermore, if Americans were enslaving Black Americans or discriminating against Blacks and Hispanics, there are U.S. laws that people can pursue to help protect themselves from discrimination. How is it that he doesn’t talk about the discrimination against Americans and Christians and Jews by the Muslim world?
Should Americans then not ask how is it that Barack Hussein Obama has been admitted into the White House for two terms and holds himself out as a Black man, knowing he’s a Mulatto, prove him to be prejudice against his other half of his own genetic race? Doesn’t such behavior make comments about Black slavery moot after being admitted to the highest office in the land as an non-vetted Black U.S. President? Also, a large number of Black Americans and more ethnic citizens have been elected into public office in recent years which renders this a land of opportunity for all. Ireland, a majority of whites, support Obama, so where’s the discrimination against Black Americans? The fact is that the American people believe that public servants must be held accountable should they be involved in scandals or violate the Rule of Law, including Article II, Section 1, accordingly, so if demanding that constitutional law be upheld is racists then it will only be racists in the eyes of those who are guilty and oppose upholding the Rule of Law. The accusations against public servants on any and all levels shouldn’t be dismissed no more than accusations against average citizens accused of wrong doing by this regime. There are many Blacks and a good number of Hispanics working in the White House. A liberal Hispanic woman has been appointed into the Supreme Court which proves that America is a land of opportunity for all people who strive for a better life.
How is it okay for public servants to allow people they favor to violate constitutional law and not hold them accountable, but punish law-abiding legal Americans based on an accusation for the same violation of the law even if innocent? Any public servant who violates the Code of Ethics or the Rule of Law should not be excused from their actions because of their race or ethnicity. It is true that political speeches can pit people against each other and divide Americans. Speeches read by public servants from the White House should be taken seriously when they are pitting Black and White Americans against each other.
Therefore, Public Servants shouldn’t be allowed to exempt themselves, or hold themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, no matter what their race, or ethnicity. Public Servants should not be allowed by law to exempt congress, illegals, union members, refugees, or foreign immigrants from complying with the pay-up-front unconstitutional mandates or excessive penalties implemented by ObamaCare or for Traffic Tickets or Court Fines, City and County fines, or excessive taxes or excessive tax penalties. If a law is good enough for the American people then it should be good enough for all public servants unless they admit that they aren’t U.S. citizens. Only criminals and Non-Citizens and Foreigners whose goal it is to change America into the foreign nation as they unlawfully hold themselves above Constitutional Laws.
In conclusion, the pattern of unconstitutional and unethical agendas that began in the 1990’s through 2015 are creating a majority of Americans who don’t trust their legislatures. They have failed to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Sovereignty and allowed the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and failed to fund small businesses and create jobs for 7 years for legal Americans. In fact, they have a pattern of attacking Americans who took the risk to build a business and employ Americans. Americans were shocked when they witnessed the United States Congressional members led by Senators McCain, Graham, and Levin, shove the NDAA Law down the throats of Americans. The Democratic and RINO Congress shoved the Patriot Act and Obamacare down the throats of the taxpayers against the objections of the majority of Americans. These laws are in opposition of U.S. Constitutional Laws and appear to target Americans, not so much foreign enemies. (This article may be shared but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). [Follow – Reblog – Comment Below]
Twitter@Rose4Justice, Facebook/RoseColombo, LinkedIn/Rose4Justice
Books: 1) Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help at amazon.com
Books: 2) Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, political satire at amazon.com
Radio: 1) Rose Colombo N The Justice Club, MWF, 9am-10:30am pst or 12p-1:30pm est-usa, Listen Live Worldwide Online, Podcsts, (347) 324-3704, http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Radio: 2) Women Fight Back, Rose Colombo and Victoria Lee Scott, Every Wednesday, 10:30am-12p pst-use and 1:30pm-3pm est -Listen Live worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-3704 – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice, Pinterest, Digg, Tumblr. Google+
“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”
Wake up, America! How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land? It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a restructured set of laws replacing freedom and liberty, in my opinion. ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!
In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must notgo down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”
After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers. A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period! There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress.
So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval? Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself – the authority to conceal his identity from the government – and from the public. It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval. When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land? This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval? Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?
Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law? This makes it very difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge, Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.
The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent foreign and anti-American usurpers from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President. It is the birthright of every U.S. Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected. The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions, and for the preservation of Western Civilization so future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.
For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America. He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions. Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority.
A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions. Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education. All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens.
A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.”
Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation? It appears to me that the American people should be very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law. How is that?
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections. The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place. In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.
Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit. On the day of the inauguration about January 2009, Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech. Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV. A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.
But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II, the question remains if he intended to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal? Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself the authority to conceal his identification records from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals? So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?
Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical? After all, Article II requires identification of the public servant and proof that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.
On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws. Thus, how is an amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to alter Article II to the 111th Congress and seek Congressional approval?
So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record. The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.
Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses. After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor. The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections. And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual. After the elections of 2008, published records from the Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record. If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information.
As I stated, this begs the question of why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II be considered an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?
These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth. And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President. Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.
How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens. ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved. The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims, SEIU union members, possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals. So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty, then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?
In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.
ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation. Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off taxes of the hard working American citizens. ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.
Therefore, I have three questions: 1) How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress? 2) How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people; 3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare? (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices. She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices. Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –
written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/19/2011
We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009. Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members between 2009 – 2011. The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.
Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit” list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government? It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens. If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law? A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!
Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008: “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies. It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members. There are hundreds of missing guns!
Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.” Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money. The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.
How is it that the Obama czars, the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Homeland Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?
We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley. We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation. More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.
Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.
The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:
1. 1992: Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.
2. 2000: Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits. She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign. She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.
3. March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.
4. March 25, 2004: SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)
5. July 29, 2005: S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing
6. September 2005: Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune
7. 2006: Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]
8. 2008: New York Times: “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].
9. October 20, 2008: Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
10. March 13, 2009: Gun Ban List: HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.
11. L.A. Times 3/27/2009: “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”
Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”
“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”
12. March 2009: Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A. Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%]. They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.
13. March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.
14. May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.
15. August 14, 2009: CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1: “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”
16. August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2: Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.
17. June 28, 2010: The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”
18. July 20, 2010: The Examiner by Howard Portney read: “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”
Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest; or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?
19. May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.
20. June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’ Clinton said in an interview. “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
21. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.
22. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.
23. August 2010: Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights: She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.
24. August 2010: Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders: Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts. She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.
25. September 2, 2010: Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics. [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]
26. January 8, 2011: Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents. Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.
27. Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury. He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.
28. January 8, 2011: LiteNews.com – U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life. Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush. He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner. Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency. The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll. Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.
29. February 23, 2011 Letter: Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”
30. February 2011 Letter posted on-line: Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico. “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”
31. June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein: “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations. This administration routinely ignores subpoenas. The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.” .
32. May 23, 2011: CNN seen on You Tube video: Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks. [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)
33. 2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.
On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America. On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body. On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki. Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?” These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.
In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date, as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens. The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future. **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).
The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review. Read Reviews andcomplimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
By Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/13/2011, Rev. 4/7/2012, 2017
Hooray for Hollywood! Liberal Democrats gathered support for the unvested president Barack Hussein Obamaaka Barry Soetoro, who promised to bring “change” to America. At a Hollywood event, Obama stated to the audience that he was going to attack them with drones and they laughed.He said, “You think I’m joking.” Well, I never think he’s joking! And the audience continued to laugh and applaud. Today, Americans are faced with a unvested president who allegedly holds himself above congressional and constitutional law and seems to ignore our democratic process. America is a Republic which is operated according to the Rule of Law.
Furthermore, the news reported Obama is appointing a panel to create a secret “kill list” of U.S. Citizens, who could be murdered by assassination, based on Obama’s accusation only or his non-vetted Czars and possibly his Muslim Brotherhood appointees. They could accuse Americans living on foreign or domestic soil. U.S. Citizens could be accused of being “dangerous” or “right-wing extremists” which is based upon political and religious affiliations, activism, and published writings or accused of being a dissident. In other words, Americans will be denied their U.S. Constitutional rights to exercise “due process of law” guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. Guilty as charged even if innocent! Isn’t that how tyrannical dictators and communist dictators operate by punishing people who oppose their government’s laws, mandates, and regulations? Compliance vs. non-Compliance? So, if a secret “kill” list is enacted allowing the executive branch to target Americans for assassination without due process of law, would that include witnesses and whistleblowers who would testify against the government?
Remember, that the NDAA law reflects the tyrannical laws inflicted upon citizens of Third World nations ruled by a tyrannical leader with an iron fist, not constitutional laws. In other words, Congress has created a new law titled NDAA which shreds due process of law equally important with Article II, but under NDAA, due process of law is the most important law inserted into the U.S. Constitution for it is the only law that prevents tyranny and genocide. Is everyone in Hollywood still laughing? In fact, the news reported most recently, Homeland Security has been instructed to fly drones over America and spy on the American people!
Although, the president’s Executive Order allegedly provides himself with the unprecedented authority to pick and choose which Americans on foreign or U.S. soil will be accused and labeled killed or assassinated, the U.S. Congress, who is the only body that can make and approve laws, is silent! They are allowing the nation to be run by excessive Executive Orders without congress exercising the fiduciary duty and upholding the 14th Amendment as required by law. In fact, the 112th Congress led by senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham implemented the NDAA law that targets Americans for assassination and indefinite detentions through Congress which shocked the American taxpayers! Yet, congress exempts themselves from unconstitutional and unread laws since 2009.
Recently, the news reported that Obama ordered a “hit” on an American citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki who the government reported dead, but the government also stated that they didn’t retrieve the body, but how is it they didn’t retrieve the body for positive identification? Although, al-Awlaki converted to the Muslim faith and spoke out heatedly against American policies, there weren’t any criminal charges filed against him by the U.S. government. He wasn’t armed or captured and he wasn’t provided due process of law, although he allegedly had been reported to have visited the Pentagon without incident where he could have been arrested. Shockingly, al-Awlaki’s assassination and his minor child’s assassination occurred prior to the approval of the NDAA Law. Shouldn’t this beg the question which constitutional authority Obama and his administration used to provide the executive office with authority to write an Executive Order granting a U.S. President the right to assassinate any American accused as an enemy of the government even if they could be captured? Yet, al-Awlaki’s killing and that of his minor child, were ordered before the NDAA Law was enacted and while due process of law was intact. In fact, the NDAA law circumvents constitutional law.
Therefore, which constitutional authority was applied that provided the executive branch to by-pass due process of law and the judicial branch and order “hits” on American adult and an American minor child and how is the NDAA Law in the best interest of the majority of the American people? The NDAA law defies due process of law guaranteed by U.S. Constitution. Also, the anti-war.com blog is an article that states “Obama has Gaddafi’s 16-year-old son, friends killed at dinner,” but this information is very difficult to find in main stream news as many articles and videos are being made unavailable for public scrutiny.
Also, Obama is named in a myriad of eligibility lawsuits filed by attorneys, i.e., Philip J. Berg, esq., and Orly Taitz, esq., as well as other prominent lawyers and military officers, and Sheriffs alleging that there are numerous computer experts alleging Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries. The news reported that FBI complaints have been filed by computer experts. Ironically, Obama has allegations filed against him with the courts and FBI, yet he was allowed to order a “hit” on al-Awlaki and his minor child, who didn’t have any criminal charges filed against them at the time Obama ordered the assassination of unarmed American citizens versus ordering their capture. So, why is Congress remaining silent on the NDAA law that targets Americans based on accusation only, which opens the door to legal abuse and possibly wrongful murders?
Americans should be demanding to know why congress is silently allowing Obama to rule the nation by Executive Order through excesses of mandates and requirements, excessive regulations, excessive taxation, unconstitutional punishment and excessive penalties making the Middle Class poorer while Obama approves in excess of $1 billion in U.S. tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood with knowledge that their stated strategic goal is to wipe out Israel and Western civilization, Executive Orders were not intended to be used and abused so one man could rule the United States of America without congressional or constitutional authority and redistribute the wealth to foreign ant-American nations. The congress and DOJ are trampling on the Rule of Checks and Balances. Americans are witnessing all three branches of government morphing into one branch of government. The Obama Nation!
Congress allowed a non-vetted man with a foreign-born father and Subject of Britain to grant himself absolute power by writing and approving a myriad of Executive Orders from day one after taking office, but under which constitutional or state law is it that provides a public servant the legal right to conceal his identity and credentials from all branches of the federal government and the government, We The People ? President Obama approves excessive Executive Order and by-passes congress and usurps constitutional authority.
Obama declared his excessive Executive Orders as the new laws of the land. Obama and congress usurped due process of law by approving the NDAA Law as well as approving an extension of the Patriot Act. Due Process of Law is the only constitutional law established for the prevention of tyranny and genocide. In fact, Obama’s excessive signing of Executive Orders caused congressional members, Dan Lundgren and Ron Paul to state on the record, on the congressional floor ,that Executive Orders are not laws. The only reason that Congress is silent, in my opinion, is that they approve of Obama’s usurping the congress and constitution by Executive Order or else they would exercise their authority and Repeal and Defund.
Well then, how is it possible for a non-vetted president to use tax dollars without congressional approval and appoint a panel of federal government non-vetted Czars paid by U.S. taxpayers to create a “hit list”that’s intended to murder Americans by assassination without Due Process of Law as well as eliminate due process of law from the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees U.S. Natural Born and long time generational legal citizens the right to access their Miranda Rights, and a lawyer. Yet, the Obama administration and USAG, Eric Holder insist that the Muslim Radicals involved in 911 or other criminal acts be read Miranda Rights and provided Due Process of Law. On the other hand, U.S. Natural Born Citizens if accused of being an enemy combatant are denied their constitutional rights to exercise Due Process of Law by implementing the NDAA law as well as the Patriot Act.
In other words, the NDAA law prohibits Americans accused by the U.S. government of being an enemy combatant from accessing charges filed, a lawyer, a trial or appeals as reported in the news by Senator Feinstein. In other words, if U.S Natural Born Citizens are accused of being a “dissident,” they could accused and punished and left to rot in a jail cell.
Therefore, Americans must ask under which constitutional authority and fiduciary job duty is the 112th Congress or Obama applying that provides them the authority to shred due process of law and implement the NDAA law. The NDAA law or Patriot Act isn’t in the best interest of the American people, but could result in their demise or punishment. It’s crucial that U.S. citizens who are the taxpayers peacefully resist and denounce the federal government using U.S. tax dollars to implement the assassination of American citizens, unarmed Americans, who could be accused of being an enemy combatant on U.S. or foreign soil. So, are Americans being forced to pick up the tab for the Muslim Brotherhood to continue their stated strategic goals against Western Civilization. Are Americans being forced to pay for the possibility of their own assassinations and indefinite detentions if targeted by the Obama regime? Even more amazing is that Americans are paying the wages to employ the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House! How is this possible?
Remarkable as it is – Americans and Brits are losing their constitutional freedom and liberty. Actually, I read that the lineage of British royalty is tied to Germany and that several members of British royalty married Germans and embraced the nazis. The articles read that British Royalty changed their German names to English surnames during WWII as the English people intensely opposed the Nazi’s.
So, it shouldn’t surprise the Brits if they do their homework to realize how their government may have been infiltrated subtly with public servants who oppose freedom and liberty. Most recently, Obama toasted his allegiance to the queen which hit international news. He obviously upset the Queen as she scolded him and stopped him, realizing that his allegiance is supposed to be to the United States of America, but then he is a British Subject. He admits that his father comes from a long line of Muslims and his dad, Barack Obama was born as an African in Kenya and Kenya was a Colony of Britain making Obama sr. a Subject of Britain meaning Obama inherited his fathers birthright at birth in 1961 as a Subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948; thus, Obama did not inherit a U.S. Natural Born Citizen birthright from his foreign-born father, but a foreign-born birthright. And, being a African from Kenya and a British subject does not tie him to the civil rights movement of the Black Americans, who were slaves, and known as non-persons until they were freed.
Therefore, how is it that a U.S. President and a U.S. Congress could even consider establishing laws that usurp “due process of law” for the American citizens who elected them and pay their taxpayer funded wages which is contrary to their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution. How is it that they’re OK with compiling secret “kill” lists of Americans based upon accusation only who may be 100% innocent to be killed on domestic or foreign soil including minor children? Are Americans being used as sacrifices for political or religious reasons?
Furthermore a “hit” list refers to murdering people by assassination, the word murder is switched to read “assassination” because it has a connotation that the person is a criminal who is being murdered without due process of law, but based upon accusation only.Just the fact that the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice would even consider “hit lists” and assassinations and shredding of the U.S. Constitution is evil, immoral, unconstitutional, and disgraceful in the United States of America! Our Forefathers must be turning over in their graves.
How then shall we refer to the Obama assassination “hit” list? Will Obama and his panel decide who shall be murdered by assassination based on an accusation only? Isn’t denying due process of law what the Communist Chinese do to their citizens? Nope, Obama and Congress didn’t agree to an assassination list targeted at foreign enemy nations or countries such as Kenya or Afghanistan, Iran, or China, Syria, Libya, Iraq or South Korea, and so forth, but they’re targeting American citizens, who pay Obama’s wages of $400,000 per year, as well, as pick up the unlimited tab for his excessive $100,000,000 vacations.
How is it American’s aren’t asking how is it logical for the federal government to implement an unconstitutional program and create a “hit” list that targets American citizens as potential enemies and place their names on “hit lists” for assassination, while exempting foreigners, foreign immigrants, refugees, and illegals? Is the U.S. federal government trampling on their “limited” powers while stepping on the U.S. Constitution with their “Big Foot” and creating a new business using U.S. tax dollars for programs which might be viewed as “guns for hire” making U.S. Natural Born Citizens a commodity for profit by “hit” men? After all, the DOJ under Obama’s watch used U.S. Stimulus tax dollars to purchase U.S. untracked guns and sell them to untracked cartel members in Mexico! It seems that Obama’s programs always create fear and increase taxes because he leads people to believe that he must save the nation by creating more national debt! In 2008, his Chicken Little speech, “The sky is falling” – actually worked. Well, President Bush left a national debt headed upwards of one trillion dollars, but Obama spent $5 Trillion in 2 1/2 years!
Some people may say, “Yes, but some times, really bad people should be murdered so this way, we can just get rid of them.”
The Rule of Law is established for a reason. Innocent people are murdered and die from time to time by law enforcement, but officers are held accountable, so people are protected from wrongful deaths. But under the NDAA Law, is it legal for the non-vetted president and his non-vetted czars to target Americans without recourse?
The Nazis started off with one name on their “hit” list. And, after the first “hit” was completed and the people said nothing, they went onto the second name on the list and the people said nothing. Afterwards, it became easier and easier until millions were dragged out of their homes by gun point (which has happened on US soil) and murdered the people who were too frightened to speak out as the army grew bigger and bolder and more insensitive to murdering people. So, Hitler was emboldened as he was unopposed. He created his National Civilian Security Force and they marched into each city and forced their way into the privacy of the citizen’s homes and dragged them into the street and either executed them or enslaved them into concentration camps because they were good people who did nothing to stop them when the writing was on the wall.
In 2001 and 2008, Obama stated that congressional and constitutional authority is “meaningless.” Think about that! Why would a U.S. President boldly state that the U.S. constitution is “meaningless” after swearing an oath to uphold the constitution? He said, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than a “mere charter of negative laws [liberties} that need to be changed” in 2001, 2008 and 2012, but those videos and articles are probably scrubbed from the internet as well.
Of course, people may ask, “Who cares?” He says he’s an American and said that he was born in Hawaii and that’s good enough for me.” Well, then why isn’t it good enough for all illegals just to say that they were born in the United States? The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen must be adhered to so a foreigner can’t usurp the presidency and insert foreign laws, foreign history into U.S. history books, and foreign religions that force Americans to comply or else be punished on U.S. soil! This is how anti-American foreign enemies change and transform a nation into their nation while the people sleep, they conspire.
Remember, “Every congressional member and public servant pledges their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, not to a public servant. But, today, the congress, senate, and judiciary appear to be more concerned with protecting public servants from the Constitution than protecting the Constitution from public servants.” (C) 1989
You may say,“But, public servants can’t assassinate American citizens or throw them into prisons without due process of law in America.”
Of course, many people ask, “Who cares if Obama or Panetta ordered the murder by assassination of a war criminal whose name is Osama bin Laden?” He was the mastermind behind murdering 3,000 Americans on 911, so who cares about due process of law? In other words, those people believe in a barbaric lynch mob and mob rule, but it is “Due Process of Law, which sets America apart from the rest of the world.
(Yet, has anyone asked how many people, victims, whistleblowers and witnesses, or First Responders have died because of 911 between 9/11/01 and 2013?)
But, I tell you that the Rule of Law should not be violated unless you don’t care that you or your loved ones names can be placed on a “hit” list! The U.S. Constitution is what protects the guilty and the innocent from tyranny and mob rule executions and preserves a civilized nation. Could this be an ungodly and immoral agenda with the intent of sensitizing Americans so they ignore the stories similar to the rumors that rang out in Europe when the people did nothing, while they watched millions of people executed, enslaved, imprisoned, experimented upon, and exterminated?
Should a nation of U.S. Natural Born Citizens not demand that their U.S. Congress repeal and deny funding for illegal and unconstitutional or immoral laws that target Americans for indefinite detentions and assassinations based on accusations while these lawmakers exempt themselves from the same tyranny that they approve? How then would Americans know if they are targeted as an “extremist” or “radical” or “dangerous?” Does the list consist of Christians, or Catholics and Jews? Does the list include heterosexuals or citizens who believe in pro-life or traditional marriage? Does the hit list consist of citizens who are Conservatives and Republicans or Libertarians? Does the “hit” list include Blacks or Hispanics or Whites or Italians or Jews? Does the “hit” list include Pregnant Women or Sick or Disabled? How about the Elderly, Veterans or U.S. Military who lets say believe in God or read the Bible? Does the list include members of the Tea party or the Oath Keepers? How then shall the American people know which citizen names will be added to the “hit” list by the panel consisting of non-vetted Czars?
Of course, you may ask, “Who cares about Article II, anyway? Who cares if a President of the United States is a “U.S. Natural Born” citizen?
Furthermore, Article II is the most important law of the land! There is a legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen that clarifies that if a baby is born on U.S. soil and one parent is foreign-born then the baby is not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be a U.S. President – Period! The baby doesn’t inherit a U.S. Birthright from their foreign-born father as required by U.S. law, but inherits a foreign-born birthright from his or her father making the baby a “naturalized” citizen only. The birthright guarantees U.S. Natural Born Citizens the right and privilege to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but if a usurper steals a U.S. Natural Born Citizen’s Birthright and is elected as a U.S. President, then that person has denied a U.S. Natural Born Citizen their natural-born Birthright, who is legally eligible, to be a U.S. President. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen Birthright must be cherished and upheld to preserve Western Civilization for it is preserved by our forefathers as a right to be an eligible U.S. President and this is the key that separates U.S. Natural Born Citizens from all Naturalized citizens.
Ironically, to my knowledge, there aren’t any senate hearings scheduled for an investigation into the assassination of an unarmed American and his minor child who should have been protected under the U.S. Constitution with the right to exercise due process of law, but were assassinated, prior to the NDAA being enacted.
I think we all agree that Osama bin Laden was a dangerous leader who is reported to target America on 911. His death was reported to have been killed or died from kidney disease 9 different times in the news by political leaders between Dec. 2001 and 2012. Even a former CIA agent stated that Osama’s body was on ice and those reports were in the news between December 2001 -2011. Admittedly, Obama and or Panetta ordered the assassination of the unarmed Osama sitting in a living room holding a remote versus his capture and tried. The news reported that Obama and Panetta ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean and called it a burial at sea which upset the Muslim nation. The government published photos of Osama’s assassination, but later retracted them stating all the photos were fakes. I read that Muslims don’t bury their leaders at sea. The news alleged Obama ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean [and fed to the sharks]. The fact that Osama wasn’t captured, even though he was unarmed, or his dead body not turned over to the proper law enforcement authorities for positive examination, left doubt in the minds of the world, especially since the assassination occurred right before elections.
The news reported that Obama and Biden were reported in the news to have exposed the identities of the Navy Seal heroes which is unprecedented. Prior to 2009, the government wanted war criminals captured alive, if at all possible, so they could interrogate them and extract information which is what President Bush ordered after 911. For example, if a law enforcement officer killed a suspect then dumped the suspect’s body into the ocean, even if the suspect was considered an evil person, the police officer would probably be sitting in a jail cell. Now, we’ll never know what Osama or Al-Awlaki or his teenage son, or Gaddafi or his teenage son, grandkids, and family knew about the radicals attacking the USA and declaring war on America on September 11, 2001.
Of course, people may ask, “But, who cares if he dumped Osama’s body at sea?”
Again, the Rule of Law must be followed by every citizen including public servants if justice is to prevail. The U.S. federal government spent billions of tax dollars over 10 years for the capture of Osama bin Laden. But, Obama and Panetta’s assassination orders reported in the news of foreign leaders should send shivers down the spine of every leader in every nation, as none of the assassinated leaders involved were armed at the time of their murders. In fact, al-Awlaki was an American, who wasn’t charged with a crime. On the other hand, Libyan leader, Gaddafi, didn’t attack America. So, how does anyone know who could be next victim, whether a foreigner or an American citizen, under the NDAA Law approved by the 112th Congress and Obama. For example, could an enemy be seen as a whistleblower or a witness? The NDAA law leaves massive room for abuse.
Of course you may ask, “If a U.S. President thinks someone is a danger to the government then he should put a “hit” out on him?”
The Rule of Law in America makes it clear that a “hit” list and gathering names of Americans to be placed on a “hit” list in my opinion equates to a conspiracy to commit murder usually thought of as some thing a “gang” or “organized criminals” or mafia or cartels do. “Hit” lists are utilized by criminals and shouldn’t be used against America’s law-abiding Americans accused by their government without probable cause and a search warrant and due process of law. This is why this nation established due process of law to protect the innocent. We have a Department of Justice which many believe has turned into a department of injustice.
Of course, people may say, “Who cares if Obama had Osama murdered by assassination, after all, he was a war criminal. Besides, it would cost millions of tax dollars to try him.”
I stress, the Rule of Law must be followed in a Republic. Think about that! If it’s okay to assassinate unarmed people without constitutional or congressional authority then what’s to prevent a government from assassinating whistleblowers and witnesses and call it legal so the witnesses can’t testify against public servants or prominent people in courts of law? It could establish a pattern that it’s the right of the government to decide who is an enemy and silence people or dump their bodies into the ocean or shred the evidence. It would have been interesting to learn what details that Osama and Gaddafi could have provided to the world that may have shed some light on the radicals or 911.
But people say, “Who cares if Obama ordered the murder by assassination of al-Awlaki, he was a very bad man.”
Should the U.S. Congress and judiciary fail to investigate the facts in the Osama and al-Awlaki assassinations then how shall the truth and the facts be reported for public review or how shall you defend yourself if accused under the NDAA law?
Of course, many people will ask, “Who cares if Obama attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and killed his grandkids and freedom fighters, he was a very bad man” without the approval of the U.S. Congress or constitutional authority?
And, once again, I stand firm that the Rule of Law must be strictly followed or Americans shall reap the tears of tyranny should the citizens not demand that congress and law enforcement uphold the constitution, especially Article II and Article IV and due process of law. The constitution grants congress authority and power to declare war, not the president. We mustn’t make excuses that just because one president or public servant violated constitutional law that it’s okay for the next one to do so. Besides, Gaddafi didn’t threaten America, but he was Obama’s long time friend and supporter, who referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and this begs the question how he suddenly became Obama’s enemy and ended up #2 on Obama’s “hit” list, and begging for his life – unarmed – assassinated under Obama’s orders. If someone steals a cookie, should the next kid be allowed to steal 2 cookies, too? If that’s the case, it won’t be long before all the cookies and the cookie jar are stolen. If someone kills a dog because he’s barking, not attacking, is the murder of the dog justifiable?
Of course, many people say, “But, they are all bad guys. Who cares if they were murdered by assassination?”
Well, we have bad people in America too, including evil politicians in some cases. We, too, experience bad people exposed in our government. Americans probably have some bad friends or relatives secretly hidden away in their closets. How then shall we complain and justify if a good and innocent American citizen enters a foreign nation and is murdered by assassination and we complain “evil” if we don’t follow the Rule of Law?
Of course, people will say, “But, those American citizens shouldn’t have gone into that country, they were stupid.”
Of course, people do stupid things, but assassinating people because they do some thing stupid or citizens who oppose political or religious agendas shouldn’t be a reason to compile a list of citizen names to be included or added onto a “hit” list and unknown to the citizens to be targeted for murder by assassination or indefinite detention. They already compile secret no fly lists and innocent Americans are denied the right to get on an airplane without recourse. Think about that! Isn’t that what Hitler did? We watch movies of communist and Third World nations run by tyrannical leaders who assassinate and indefinitely detain people in their countries without due process of law, but are we now facing the words of “compliance” and “non-compliance?”
Listen up! Call, email, write, your congressional members and demand that they Repeal the unconstitutional NDAA law which not only targets Americans but circumvents and shreds Article IV, of the U.S. Constitution, Due Process of Law and Article II and vetting policies as required by our government’s congressional members and Secretary of State and Speaker of the House. It’s written into my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” the following – “Without DueProcess of law, there is nothing, – nothing but tyranny.”
Wake up, all you sleepy heads! Perhaps, it’s time to unite across the nation and March on D.C. peacefully and legally with the Sheriffs and Constitutional lawyers. The U.S. Congress must stop the insanity of shredding the U.S. Constitution and targeting law-abiding Americans who pay their wages. What is happening in America is insane! In fact, there are published articles reporting that the President of France, Sarkozy, met with Obama, and allegedly stated that Sarkozy said that Obama is “insane.” I don’t know about that, but I do believe most Americans believe he has an unconstitutional agenda. And, I don’t care what anyone thinks, creating a federal panel of unidentified czars and a secret “hit” list of law-abiding Americans by selective processes, which includes illegally spying on citizens, and using U.S. tax dollars is evil. And even more evil is collecting names of Americans accused of being an enemy of the United States without being provided due process of law and placed on a “kill list” to be murdered is insane! These unconstitutional laws deny U.S. Constitutional Law, Article II, due process of law, the Right-to-Life, unalienable God-given rights, and killing U.S. Citizens, not foreign enemies, but U.S. Citizens is no different from pre-meditated murder in my opinion.
Shame on the 111th and 112th U.S. Congress! It’s shocking that elected public servants would approve indefinitely detaining or assassinating Americans, which is unconstitutional, immoral, unjust, unfair, and despicable. It’s ridiculous that American leaders would declare American citizens “guilty” as accused which reflects the tyrannical laws of barbarians. It’s stunning that America’s leaders would approve secret kill lists and assassinate American adults and minor kids accused of a crime without due process of law. This raises the question if the government is reducing the population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens and making room for foreigners and refugees and Communist China and Russia to claim U.S. districts of soil? These serious unconstitutional laws should be worrisome to Americans, as it appears that Obama and Congress, the new immigrants, refugees, and illegals are opted out of the unconstitutional laws approved by Obama and Congress, as well as the punishments, being implemented against U.S. natural-born and legal generational naturalized citizens, i.e., NDAA Law, Patriot Act, secret Kill Lists, Obamacare and the Immigration Bill.
Rose says, “A successful civilized genocide through mandates that wipe out freedom, liberty, rights, sovereignty, the right-to-life, health care, as well as silence a nation, a nation that has been slumbering for far too long, can be argued and perceived by evil doers as an act of genius if one views evil as a good thing for the benefit of those who implement the evil acts; thus the evil doers rationalize their acts against humanity as justifiable and implement evil deeds without conscience.” (C) 2011
Rose Colombo, long time legal and political activist, helping victims of legal abuse become survivors for 25 years. For more information visit Rose’s website – http://www.colombochronicles.com –
Read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s Award Winner self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” or her latest Political Satire with humorous fictional characters and an Orwell 1984 type of fictional story that parallels today’s political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” google www.amazon.com
Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015
How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld? Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law. Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows: “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”
In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators. The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent. This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical lawmakers who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.” Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights, And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the Law of Nations.
Sharia Law states it is a Law. And, it is a foreign Law! The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period. It is called “Treason.” Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East. Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well. The experts on Sharia state that Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law. It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.
Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated. Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel. The U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from church and state and provides freedom of religion in America. In other words, Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately. Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization with Sharia Law. And, there lies a major difference. The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.
In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow. In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!
On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land. There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization. It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs. Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.
Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food, and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children. But, in America, a majority of U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches. Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level? Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization. We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!
For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil. Should we not ask if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans? If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization, then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported. Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely. In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.
In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare. It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty. In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill? If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped from their titles by We The People?
It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason. Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by. The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!
Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only? Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?
The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare. This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves! I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.
The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance. It’s their way or the highway! Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often. The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.
Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion! It states what it is – Sharia Law. A LAW! In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world. One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization. The radicals killed 3,000 Americans. They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration. They damaged the Pentagon. They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke. Many 911 witnesses who came forward and testified about what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind. Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.
Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East. They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims. They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books. The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.
Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.” Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not political “Laws,” but separate laws in America. Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time. Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization. And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment. The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food. Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.
The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:
In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” onemust understand their meaning and intent and purpose. The Law defines “Religion” as follows: “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”
Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation. If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.
The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ? And, why does a health care law include 2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts? Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans. It uses programs to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies. Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world. The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.
Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses. And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law. What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States? In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state. People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.
Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution. Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.
Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths? Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag. Again, Sharia Law states exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws. Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal? How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law! Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?
Treason: “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies. Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary. (Note: Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer. It’s unethical to ignore the laws of plagiarism)
If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated
Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows
Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding” with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings? Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government. Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money? After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement? Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if, Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?
Cut the Spending! Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama! He is the Print and Spend President. Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010! Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?
One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more! And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans! I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.
So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund. If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money. Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!
Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.
In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month. The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care. Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.
In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama! No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth. The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years. The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China. Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs. It’s small businesses that create more jobs. Instead, Obama created more government jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.
Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government? Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes. Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients. Social security is money earned, not welfare. Not only is Obama’s threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living. So, one must wonder if Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?
Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate. Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress. In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund. Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks, was deposited into a “Trust” Account.
Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property? How is diverting the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens considered ethical? How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff. Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.
Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable. In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected. Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.
So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?
In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama. Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA. China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?
About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. . On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters. Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.
Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars. Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk. Obama fired off 221 tomahawks – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people. Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news. He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.
Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt. For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953. Think about that!
How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president. In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008. Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.
But, Obama made history. Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion! He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.
Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder. Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?
Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.
Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt? China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.
The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work. The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A. Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations. He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A. Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.
In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078. Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years. By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615. In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion. But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.
But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion! Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there. He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher. So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?
2011: U.S. Population = 311, 756,198 (2008 = 304,421,946)
2011: U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291 (2008 = 108,228,953)
2011: Official Unemployed = 14,055,369 (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)
2011: Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)
2011: State Local Employees = 15, 892,215
2011: Federal Employees = 4,305,706
2011: U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347
2011: U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)
2011: U.S. Families = 82,102,337 (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]
2011: Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907 (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]
2011: Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470
2011: Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799
2011: Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising
2011: Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising
2011: Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising
2011: Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138
2011: Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]
2011: Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)
2011: Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising
2011: Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising – a substantial decrease as of 2011)
2011: Assets Per Citizen = $242,722 (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))
2011: U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]
2011: Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)
2011: Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281
2011: Total Debt Per Family = $669,109
2011: Savings Per Family = $6,953 [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]
2011: U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit: $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *
2011: National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503
2011: National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747
2011: Income Tax: $946,651,562,999 and rising *
2011: Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising
2011: Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]
2011: U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)
I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans. Another example of waste is the multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs. But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second
Note: The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!
Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!
(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt). Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas. You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com