Are the U.S. Police and Military Being Forced to Choose the USA or a Foreign Body To Serve or Be Purged For UN World Army?

Rose Colombo 11/18/2013 (c), Rev. 9/27/2014

Americans Own The Bill of Rights!
Americans Own The Bill of Rights!

Preview Image

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HM5V4XK5J8EP4

Americans should be shouting out, “Give me Life and Give me Liberty, for the alternative is not a Resolution but a Revolution, tempted by the enemy’s threats blowing in an ugly direction in the wind towards Communism and the Muslim Brotherhood demanding the demise of Americans and America!”

Bill Clinton said, “The American People will get use to Communism” are the headlines of several articles reported in the news who believe these are the the same words used by Communist Leaders of the past.  Bill Clinton’s exact words are [Obamacare] “will be like Medicare and Medicaid and it’ll be a normal part of our life and people will be glad it’s here.” (Obamacare is unconstitutional and includes Mandates, Regulations, and Punishments that resemble Communist China and Socialism).   Bill Clinton’s actions reflect his statement as he sought refuge from the Communists when he dodged the draft  during the 1960’s.  He embraced Communist China and outsourced America’s technology, jobs, and manufacturing companies to Communist China rendering America’s economic status beneath that of Communist China.   He funded both Russia and China with billions of U.S. tax dollars.  He accepted unlawful donations from the Communist Chinese and attempted to lease the Long Beach Port to Communist China.

Hillary Clinton asked, “What difference does it make?”  And, Obama said, “The Constitution is meaningless.  The Congress is meaningless.  The Framers are flawed.  The American people are “small minded,” and “spoiled” and “oppressive.”  Gruber said the American people are “stupid.”  Obama said the U.S. Flag is seen as “oppressive” by the Muslim nations and the Bible and the Sermon on the Mount is violent as well as the National Anthem.  He said the National Anthem and the U.S. Constitution need to be changed.  Obama said, he will “bankrupt” the coal mining states, “Skyrocket electricity,” and “disarm Americans.”  Obama said, he will “fundamentally transform America” and create a more “powerful” and more “well-funded” National Civilian Security Force,” and open the borders because the illegals are the “same as us.”  And most stunning is that Obama said that America is no longer a Judeo-Christian Nation, but a Muslim Nation.  The Congress as of 2007 remain complicit on vetting policies and Article II and have failed the American people by failing to hold anyone accountable for anti-American declarations and Nepotism, Scandals involving Murdered Americans, and funding of anti-American organizations and individuals. They are complicit as the U.S. Military is purged and the U.S. Military and U.S. Law Enforcement are being weakened.  They have failed to uphold the U.S. Constitution and the three federal laws listed below:

H.R. Res. 644 Condemns the Obama administration for violating federal law by
releasing dangerous Taliban 5 without Notifying Congress.

8 USC 1424 – Violation of Visas to Individuals or Members of Groups Fighting to
destroy the Constitution and the Republic, e.g., Marxist, Muslim Brotherhood,
Islamic terrorist groups, cartels, gangs [providing material assistance to
foreign anti-American enemies]

USC Title 18 Sec. 1621: “Whoever having taken an oath before a competent tribunal
officer, or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes, or an
oath to be administered willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes to
any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury, and
shall be fined no more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.”

However, is it not of a serious matter requiring that We The People question those elected within the Federal Government if they are aware of the above serious Federal Laws?  How then have the above laws been ignored, not thoroughly investigated by the taxpayer funded Federal Congress, Judges, Sergeant at Arms, Senators, and Federal Agencies paid to uphold, defend, preserve, protect, and serve Americans, but protecting men and women, instead? Should the government, We The People, not question why the oval office and Congress continue on their path of funding and serving foreign enemies and illegals by employing or providing taxpayer funding and tax exempt status, especially to relatives and Muslim Brotherhood members or affiliates, which is “Nepotism?”  It is not favoritism and discriminatory to use and abuse their positions to taxpayer fund and provide non-profit status to relatives and friends or foreign enemies?

NEPOTISM:   How is their actions involving “nepotism” not being addressed as they fail to adhere to the laws of the land do they not?  The federal public servants – lawmakers – in positions of power have knowledge, that there are high-ranking federal elected and appointed public servants, who have violated one, two, or three of the above listed federal laws.  These three Federal Laws require that Congress perform their duty and investigate scandalous crimes, order Grand Jury hearings, as well as hold meaningful Congressional hearings, and appoint Special Prosecutors.  It’s their fiduciary duty to make the effort to investigate scandals involving murder in an effort to restore the trust of the entire Federal Government. Is it not an egregious act of incompetence and a Dereliction of Duty for the Federal Government to slam the door shut to the cries and Grievances involving crimes when the Oval Office, DOJ, and Congress have knowledge of such criminal scandals?

Should the current taxpayer-funded Representatives continue to remain complicit and ignore these serious matters then they, too, should be held accountable by We The People for Dereliction of Duty?  Since 2009, it appears that the corruption has permeated an entire Federal Government. Due to the greed and Bad Faith on the part of a myriad of elected and appointed public servants, it appears that We The People believe that it’s rife with corruption and has been left unchecked. As I wrote in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” the following words.  “Never vote lawyers into the oval office for the majority of public servants in the Judiciary and Legislative Branches of the Federal Government are lawyers and when We The People vote lawyers into the oval office, they have morphed all three branches of government together and eliminated – Check and Balances” – which leaves the American people vulnerable to tyranny. The failure to address these issues of lawless mandates and excessive taxes causes economic and military strife as such lawlessness causes We The People to suffer from a very dark shadow of doubt cast upon the Federal Government, i.e. IRS, DHS/Fema, HHS, Oval Office, USAG, EPA, DOJ, Education’s Communist core aka Common Core, and Federal Reserve which isn’t so Federal….. The dark shadow of doubt placed upon a Federal government is apparent to most Americans and borders on tyranny, which must be stopped before America is depopulated and or quarantined and indefinitely detained by DHS/Fema should Martial Law be declared on U.S. soil.

Ironically, the U.S. taxpayer funded elected Representatives have knowledge of the same Federal Laws listed above and they are informed of their written job duties established by the Constitution, but the extent and over reach by America’s non-vetted President by is own public declaration which is to by-pass congress and by-pass the U.S. Constitution, while holding himself and his supporters in Congress, above the law, and exempting themselves from the unconstitutional and unread laws that they rubber stamped approved.  For example, Obamacare, is the “unaffordable” care act and cancels out existing Health Care policies and includes death panels and euthanasia and mandated taxpayer funded abortions to wipe out future generations of U.S. Natural Born Citizens is all about depopulation of Americans.  Obamacare is far from being in the best interest of the American citizens, but in the best interest of foreign enemies.  In fact, Obamacare is unread and unread laws cannot be constitutional, lawful or legal!  They should all be held accountable for selling out the American Citizens!  They failed to perform their duties in a competent manner as required by law and within the scope of their responsibilities to read laws, debate laws, and pass read and debated and written laws by the House and Senate, not rubber stamped by U.S. Justices with Conflicts of Interest who  refused to recuse themselves from voting.

The Clinton/Reno/Holder Regime:  Furthermore, Eric Holder, the first African-American U.S. Attorney General (USAG), and the first African-American USAG to resign, the first USAG to be held in Contempt by Congress; and the first USAG to have a Conflict of Interest involving Obamacare’s mandated taxpayer funded abortions failed to disclose his wife owns an abortion clinic for-profit.  How is it they push for mandated taxpayer funded abortions in America, Africa, and other Third World Nations, but not in the Middle East whose goal it is to over-populate the world?   He worked under the Clinton administration when the OKC attack occurred and Americans were murdered.  He worked under the Clinton-Reno when the federal government attacked an American family and murdered the mother holding a baby, her child and his dog running through the forest at Ruby Ridge.  They ordered the attack at WACO when American men, women, children, including pregnant women were murdered by the Federal Government under the Clinton-Reno-Holder regime.   In fact, Holder accused the American people of being racial “cowards” on national television. Approximately 10 years ago, Holder shockingly stated to Black College students that America would be “polarized” and that the face of America would be changed within 10-15 years.

Is it not fair to assume that the intent to change the face of America and polarize Americans is linked to the open border policy and inviting illegals from Communist China, the Middle East, Mexico, and Central America, to walk into the USA with immunity and fulfill Holder’s prediction that they will change the face of America?  In other words, illegals and anti-American foreigners would dominate America and over-populate America as the Obama regime rations and denies health care to Americans.  Americans witnessed 3,000 Americans murdered – a genocide – by Islamic Terrorists on 9/11/2001, and 9/11/2012 as well as the Jihadist attacks on U.S. soil and foreign soil.  The anti-American foreigners state on video, signs, and Tweets that they are coming to dominate and wipe out Western Civilization. Their goal as stated is to slaughter millions of Christians around the world and over run Western Civilization,  infiltrate, and steal the land from Israel and Western Civilization.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s written and stated strategic goal is to wipe out Western Civilization and over run Western Civilization.  They intend to enslave and slaughter the non-compliant as ISIS and other Islamic radical groups join ISIS and are implementing their evil acts in Iraq, Syria, and Africa. They will not spare loyal Black Americans or any ethnicity who refuses to comply and convert if they aren’t stopped now. They could be stopped if we had a loyal generational identified U.S. Natural Born Citizen, who served in the U.S. Military, as the U.S. President.  We could succeed if we had a loyal American USAG, who wasn’t prejudice against the majority of Americans and Western Civilization, as well as loyal American Congressional members and Senators.  It appears that loyal Americans are targets of the current regime’s  illegal spying and targeting of Conservatives, Jews, and Christian Americans.  In fact, Americans didn’t have a clue that they elected 80 card-carrying secret Socialists into Congress, who believe in political correctness and tolerance, which is a Socialist-Nazi type agenda.  After all,, Christians do not tolerate evil attacks on human beings by anyone for world domination.

Is it fair to assume that part of this agenda implemented by the oval office is being used to fund the necessities of life of all illegals unlawfully being allowed to enter into the USA by tying the hands of law enforcement along the borders?  Should Americans not assume that Holder’s declaration that Americans will be polarized under the current administration is based upon his racial bias as he supported the non-vetted president’s agenda over the past 6 years, and those of the Clinton’s, whose stated goal is to fundamentally transform and change America which includes training and arming the Middle East Islamic Rebels or “moderates” as well as building up the economic status of Communist China?  And, who decides who is a “moderate” Islamic person?  Obama defends ISIS by declaring they aren’t an Islamic group, so if they aren’t an Islamic group but are born in Islamic Nations and memorize the Koran then how is that even close to the truth?  The “moderates” when faced with a decision will always defect to ISIS or an anti-American terrorist group for they do fear death by torture, too!

Even Obama wrote a book and some thing to the effect that if the winds blow in an ugly direction and he must choose between the USA and the Muslims, that he’d choose the Muslims. Obama’s plan for America appears to be for America to  send streams of taxpayer funding to the Syrian Rebels and provide them with U.S. vehicles, planes, weapons, funding, and helicopters. If “moderates”  defect to ISIS, they will have been well-trained and well-funded by the USA taxpayers not only with expert military training, funding, weapons, vehicles, but planes and helicopters.  ISIS is expanding and is worth about $2 Billion by their criminal acts committed on the Black Market and kidnapping and taking women and children into bondage.  ISIS continues to threaten and recruit even Europeans and America’s prisoners and over run countries and slaughter more Christians, crush more babies and cut babies in half or behead them, rape women and girls, stone and bury people alive, and terrorize the world.

OPEN U.S. BORDERS:   And with Obama’s unconstitutional, unlawful, and illegal open border policy risking the National Security and safety of Americans, they can fly planes or helicopters into the USA.  Isn’t it time for Americans to call Congress and ask why we’re being forced to pay for our own demise with our tax dollars and the lives of American men and women on the battlefields?  Remember, when Japan attacked America and declared War on America -it was over quickly. It was horrible and painful and controversial, but it definitely ended the war against America and Americans.  But, Obama declared to America that “America will never be at war with Islam.”  In other words, only Islam can be at war with American which they declared on 9/11/2001 (possibly at the OKC as the test case).  He releases the terrorists and America’s soldiers sit at Leavenworth for asking about his Birth Certificate or believing they were performing their duty when they killed the enemy.

NATIONAL CIVILIAN SECURITY FORCE:   Should American taxpayers assume that the illegals, who are unlawfully walking across our borders and committing a crime,. is the gateway and the beginning of Obama’s fundamental transformation of the U.S. Military into the U.N’s One world Foreign Army that he stated would be more well-trained and more well-funded than the U.S. Military?  Remember, Clinton’s goal was to create “Peace Keepers” and send our young men and women around the world and Panetta testified under oath at a senate hearing to Senators Sessions that “we” (Panetta and Obama) would seek “permission” from international bodies and may or may not inform the U.S. Congress!  That is a stunning testimony for which he was not held accountable.   R

Remember, the USAG, Eric Holder made it clear that he and Obama are good friends.  Holder resigned on or about September 25, 2014, at a time when a myriad of scandalous crimes involving murdered Americans and Mexicans are left unresolved. These scandalous crimes involve the IRS targeting and spying on Americans, and NSA spying on Americans.  The scandal involving a program called, Fast and Furious, which involved the diversion of Recovery Funds promised for jobs being used to purchase untracked guns trafficked onto foreign soil into Mexico and sold to untracked cartels by illegal straw men for profit without any accountability for the guns, tax dollars, profits, cartel members, or the Fast and Furious program running for two years until caught. The crime of torture and murder between 2009-2011 during the Fast and Furious operation included the murder of  Border Patrol Agents, Hispanics, Mexican police, Journalists, and Americans, which continued for two years.  In fact, many of the guns are still in the hands of the cartels and the Border Patrol and ICE job duties have been weakened according to news reports.

US Assistant AG Ogden:  On or about April 2009, Holder, Obama, and assistant AG, Ogden, held a Press Conference announcing that Obama was funding Fast and Furious as seen on national TV, but apparently hasn’t been mentioned during the congressional hearings.  Since the three Public Servants were present on the video, how is it Holder and Obama said they knew nothing about Fast and Furious? How is it Asst. A.G. Ogden wasn’t called to testify to the best of my recollection? The USAG, Eric Holder, failed to cooperate with Congress and he was eventually held in Contempt.  How did the Congress ignore the trips made by  Hillary Clinton back in 2009 when Hillary and Holder travelled to Mexico to assure Mexico’s President that they would stop the gun trafficking from the USA into Mexico.  And, Senator Feinstein wrote a letter to Mexico’s President on this matter about that same time.

BENGHAZI:   Former USAG, Eric Holder, was expected to appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate the false declarations by members of the White House as seen on national television about the attack on Benghazi when Islamic terrorists tortured and murdered a U.S. Ambassador and 3 U.S. Military men.  The White House  abandoned a U.S. Ambassador, Chris Stevens, alleged to be Hillary’s good friend, and three U.S. Military Men and Americans staff who feared for their lives as they escaped.  These brave American men have been reported in the news to have sent emails to the White House begging for help before being tortured, terrorized, and murdered.  But, they were abandoned by the White House and Secretary of State and no one admits to calling out the “Stand Down.”  Former Secretary of Defense Panetta testified that Obama was “AWOL,” but apparently, Congress and the Senate cared less. But, they made time to negotiate with terrorists thereafter and pay a ransom without congressional authority in exchange for an alleged traitor, but who cares about what Judge Napolitano and Honorable Allen West referred to as “Material Assistance?”

NO ACCOUNTABILITY BY CONGRESS OR THE SENATE?   In fact, all the scandals, which included Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, AP, HHS, EPA, VA Hospital, IMF, Solyndra, Libya, Material Assistance, Open Borders, Diverting Troops to Ebola infected land, Lois Lerner’s missing Emails, were left blowing in the wind without any accountability.  Yet, Obama and Hagel released 5 dangerous Terrorist Leaders from GITMO for one alleged traitor without notifying Congress declaring they never leave an American behind and funded the terrorist negotiators with U.S. tax dollars without congressional authority.  So, it appears that Congress relinquished the authority  of the purse strings to the oval office in 2009!   How easily they’ve forgotten about Benghazi and Fast and Furious!  But as Hillary Clinton said, “What difference does it make?”

Consequently, it’s of the utmost urgency that the American citizens understand the danger of what is happening to the United States Constitution, Congress, The Bill of Rights, U.S. Law Enforcement, and the U.S. Military, at least in my opinion. The media must sound the alarm! A shocking event took place! A non-vetted U.S. President has asked the U.S. Military if they would fire on Americans alleged to be a “Litmus Test!”  But, why would he do that then open up the borders and supply funding to Muslim Brotherhood leaders and open up the borders and release prisoners and terrorists?   President Obama didn’t ask if the U.S. Military would fire on ISIS, or their new imaginary group Khorosan, taking the focus off of ISIS. Remember, this all began as a test case in my opinion at the OKC bombing. The Islamic terrorists declared war on the USA on 911, and Osama bin Laden, who was reported to be the mastermind and reported to have died 10 times, ended up with the non-vetted President taking all the credit for OBL’s assassination and declaring that he ended the war on terrorism.  Americans should ask if it’s all a Hollywood illusion!

Ironically, Obama shocked the nation, when he asked if the U.S. Military would fire on American citizens! Dr. Garrow referred to this as a “Litmus Test,” but I would allege it’s possibly the beginning of the purging of loyal U.S. Military men and women and the recruitment of illegals and foreigners. This would explain in part, Obama’s regime, who have an open invitation for illegals to walk across the U.S. Borders with immunity from law enforcement, which could include gang members, unidentified kids with diseases and viruses gone unchecked, released GITMO prisoners, hard-core prisoners, and cartel members. The criminal illegals would be of a psychopathic type of personality without conscience. They have nothing to lose if the commander-in-Chief were to order the U.N.’s NWO foreign military to “Fire on Americans,” but they do have a lot to gain. The foreign illegals would gain jobs, weapons, clothing, food, housing, Obamacare, training, and empowerment, while American Troops are handed Pink Slips!  Is that why Obamacare is so important?

OBAMACARE WAR:  Why is it so important?  Let me count the ways!  It’s about Death Care to Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Americans and poor pregnant women in Third World Countries.  Microchips!  Dhimmitude and Sharia Law making Americans enslaved to millions of Muslims Obama and Hillary Clinton intend to migrate into the USA under HR 1388 secretly passed using U.S. tax dollars requiring Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, Obamacare, job hours, and education as well as “non-citizens” aka “illegals.”  After all, the majority of Americans are now baby boomers, seniors, and elders, and veterans, what a perfect time in history to make room for illegal foreigners and fundamentally transform the USA!

How could recruiting foreigners into the USA by the non-vetted Commander-in-Chief, who never served in the U.S.  Military, and never ran a business, or built a lemonade stand, but stated that he organized and trained Acorn members as recorded on video can rule by excessive Executive Order and by-pass the Constitution and Congress? He said that he trained the group called ACORN and even represented them as their Legal Counsel. The news reported that ACORN committed the crime of voter fraud. Also, it’s startling that within 239 years, he’s been the only exception to state and federal identification laws .  The entire Federal Government as of 2007 (and when running for Senate) allowed this non-vetted man to become a U.S. President and conceal his  Birth Certificate, Selective Service Records, ID, and credentials, during the vetting process, without correcting the error for the records to-date.  These records were surprisingly concealed in an existing Presidential Directive the day after swearing the Presidential Oath to uphold the law, but in reality, only Obama and Holder know if there are any records to be concealed.

“FIRE ON AMERICANS!”   Shouldn’t we ponder how it’s okay for any President to be allowed to step into the shoes as Commander-in-Chief and be allowed free reign to order a “Litmus test” asking the U.S. Military or U.S. Law Enforcement if they would fire on Americans then purge the U.S. Military of high ranking officers and Generals? Americans haven’t actually been informed if the White House ordered direct attacks against the foreign Islamic Terrorists, namely, ISIS, and ordered the military to fire upon ISIS.  ISIS is mass genocidal killing out in the open, while torturing, beheading, and executing human beings. Isis is video taping their achievements against humanity, yet they haven’t been fired upon?  ISIS comes out of “CRISIS” and Rahm said, “Never let a good CR-ISIS go to waste.”  And, Bill Clinton said, “It all depends on what the meaning of “IS IS” and “IS IS” is ISIS!

The President’s “Litmus” test is a rather odd and unprecedented event in U.S. History. Americans aren’t committing genocide, torturing the enemy, but they are forced to pay for the weapons supplied to Syrian Rebels, who many times, defect to ISIS. This is curious as well since the allegations in the news stated that Benghazi involved the cover-up that the White House allegedly was supplying weapons to the Syrian Rebels, but the Benghazi scandal was foiled and Americans were tortured and murdered. Allegedly, the Air Force is ordered to target empty buildings as reported in the news, which is some help, but the war criminals committing crimes against humanity is known as ISIS, but has Obama ordered ISIS to be fired upon? How is it that such a “Litmus” test was used against Americans? Shouldn’t such a Litmus test by a non-vetted U.S. President be investigated and declared by Congress to be unethical and outside of any vetted or non-vetted U.S. President’s job duties and job description or considered to be totally off the radar, period?

It wouldn’t be the first time that the U.S. Federal government has ordered law enforcement to fire on Americans during U.S. History. The Civil war is an example based upon racial strife when Americans fired on Americans ordered by the White House. Kent State University is another example of the U.S. government shooting and killing Americans. The Watts Riots in Los Angeles, California, or Harlem, as well as the cops firing and killing homeless Americans during Katrina and using no knock home invasions to confiscate guns. In fact, the L.A. Times reported that Correction Officers killed Black and Hispanic American prisoners for sport at Cochoran Prison. And, under the Clinton, Reno, Holder regime, the federal government fired on Americans at Ruby Ridge and WACO.  Recently, we’re hearing about more homeless people being arrested and tasered or beaten to death and abused by bad apple militant type police.

Of course, there are a myriad of incidents throughout history when Americans murdered Americans.  The police murder Americans when necessary somewhere in the USA when an incident occurs.  It’s foolish to believe that all American  police or military wouldn’t fire on Americans because history proves otherwise.  The may fire on Americans if ordered without conscience if they are sociopaths or foreign enemies recruited or if it came down to losing their jobs, homes, and livelihood. And, of course, we’ve read about the Veterans left to die when the VA Hospitals refused medical treatment and paid bonuses to employees who willingly and intentionally place veterans on long waiting lists because they’re old and sick and of no use to this new federal regime.  Planned Parenthood employs Americans and American abortionists without conscience  slaughter millions of unborn future U.S. Natural Born Citizens by stabbing the babies in the head with abortion scissors and ripping off their body parts for-profit.  Of course, there are many ways to kill
Americans without thinking it’s murder or depopulation and call it legal through brainwashing.

Remember, the non-vetted President and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, didn’t call for the American troops to fire on the Islamic terrorists at Benghazi while Americans were fired upon and died. The Department of Justice and the non-vetted President stated they knew nothing about Fast and Furious while U.S. Border Patrol and innocent people at the borders were fired upon with U.S. guns trafficked into Mexico and sold to cartel members who fired on Americans and Hispanics for two years until caught.  It’s only when good people don’t pay attention and don’t hold their public servants accountable or demand to know if those elected are legal U.S. Citizens that bad things happen to good Americans.   Americans must demand public review of the credentials and background checks of public servants so bad things don’t happen to good people.  But, Americans are complicit.  Remember, U.S. Law Enforcement is trained to kill Americans when necessary, some times by error and on occasion just because they felt like it, ,but what if ordered by an out-of-control rogue leader?

COMPLICIT CONGRESS AND SENATE?  Congress has a fiduciary duty not to ignore the actions outside of the scope of the Constitution or the ob duties of a non-vetted U.S. President.  Congress does have a duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages, the same duty as a U.S. President and all elected federal public servants.  This is a Contract.  If a non-vetted U.S. President who inferred that America is a “Muslim” nation and wrote some thing to the effect if the winds blow in an ugly direction that he’ll side with the Muslims isn’t of a concern to Congress then Americans should be asking why not! A non-vetted President or any President shouldn’t be given free rein to recruit illegal foreigners into the U.S. Military against U.S. Constitutional law and against the will of the majority of Americans represented by Congress. That’s plain as day that a transformation of a foreign army is the intent that would be more powerful and more well-funded than the U.S. Military.  Such an intent would require weakening of the U.S. Military and Defenses,, and weakening of U.S. Law Enforcement, and Gun Control.

ILLEGALS RECRUITED INTO NATIONAL CIVILIAN SECURITY FORCE?  Obviously, if foreign illegals or foreign enemies are recruited into the U.S. Military, which is pure insanity and should be investigated as treason does Congress not see the writing on the wall? The truth is that an army of illegals would be subtle in the beginning. Eventually, foreign troops from Mexico, Central America,  the Middle East, as well as  Communist China, would come into play.  The U.N. and NWO intend to form a One World Army, so if they continue on this path, they wouldn’t have to invade the USA, because America would be overrun from within its own borders if the illegal foreigners are recruited into the Military and placed into key position of DHS/Fema, and employed within the White House. The militarized police would be part of the one world army as well. Such an invasion from within would be blamed upon the current regime’s open borders policies and their purge of the U.S. Military and U.S. Law Enforcement and recruiting of illegals as new policies.  In order for Congress to remain complicit without being ld accountable is it possible they are allowing the non-vetted President to make unlawful laws by Executive Order and Memorandum which neither are constitutional law? The foreign illegals are being unlawfully invited into the USA currently through open borders by the White House and are scattered throughout the USA without legal identification. These illegals could be recruited and armed, trained, and their livelihood funded by the U.S. taxpayers as part of Obama’s Redistribution of Wealth bringing the lifestyle of Americans to a new low because they’re being handed Photo U.S. Identifications.

Ready Aim Fire!  Illegals wouldn’t have a problem firing on Americans, when or if ordered by the Commander-in-Chief, because the American taxpayers would be mandated to pay for their necessities of life under Obamacare and Americans would be paying for their own demise. The foreign unlawful illegals who were poor and had nothing have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Although, they say, the non-vetted President wants to unlawfully recruit illegals, who have been living in the USA for a certain amount of time, it wouldn’t be long before any foreign illegals would end up signing up for the foreign military force. Why Americans would be required to pay for their college education, as well, and give up work hours as well as their Christian Holidays.  Since the unlawful illegals are crossing our borders as unidentified people and non-vetted people, how would the Recruiters know the true identity for foreign illegals? After all, even the FBI reported that Islamic terrorists have taken on fake Hispanic Identifications, fake Hispanic Names, and Passports, and were taught to speak Spanish, so they would have fake dates and fake birth dates, as well.

Therefore, it’s important for the American people to ponder if Obama’s open border policy is part of the fundamental transformational change with his hope of changing America into a foreign entity by recruiting foreigners and employing anti-American foreigners into the White House, DHS, and into the U.S. Military, while handing out Pink Slips to America’s troops.  Eventually, Americans must ask if the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of wiping out Western Civilization and transforming America into a foreign Sharia Law will be allowed by 300,000,000 Americans!   Obama’s alternative use of American healthy troops is sending them to fight a deadly Ebola Virus that is contagious and without a cure versus and possibly contracting Ebola, which also weakens the U.S. Military, instead of sending them to capture and kill members of ISIS who are pilfering, raping, torturing, murdering, and committing genocide. U.S. troops signed up to capture and kill anti-American terrorists. The U.S. young and healthy troops aren’t health care personnel, so why risk 3,000 American troops susceptible to a deadly Ebola Virus over in West Africa, while thousands of innocents are being slaughtered by ISIS?  Recent news reports that the health care workers are dying as well.

Consequently, should a fundamental transformation of America be the goal, it would be important to remove U.S. High Ranking Generals and Officers from the U.S. Military if the intent is to transform the U.S. Military into a Foreign Army of Illegals because the Generals would object.  It would be necessary for Congress to remain complicit when a non-vetted President declares the Constitution and Congress as “meaningless” and the American people to be “small minded,” and “stupid” in order to trick them and polarize 300,000,000 Americans.  So, does this intelligent agenda have anything to do with the Wall Street corporation named “ISIS?” Now, this would be the icing on the cake should the transformation from a U.S. Military be changed into a foreign National Security Civilian Force more powerful and more well-funded by the U.S. taxpayers was implemented through a Wall Street ISIS Corporation. This would “change” the history of the USA and the USA into a nation controlled and patrolled by foreigners, for foreigners, and with foreigners. America would be polarized and wiped off the face of the map, not with bombs but from within as Americans would pay for their own enslavement, indefinite detention, and demise!

After January 20, 2009, the United States of America under the current democratic liberal and progressive socialist regime have ignored and avoided the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of the American people. As stated, Obama stated that he would build a National Civilian Security Force more powerful and more well-funded than the U.S. Military, but that didn’t stop people from voting for him. In fact, the U.S. Congress, to my knowledge, never bothered to ask him what he meant by that shocking statement or even how he intended to create a National Civilian Security Force or what would the costs would be to the taxpayers. They didn’t bother to tell him that he doesn’t have the authority to create a National Civilian Security Force. The fact that Congress has been silent should be of great concern to the U.S. Citizens, loyal American Law Enforcement and the U.S. Military.

The Alarm is ringing! The Terrorists are Coming!  The Illegals are Coming!   The Communists are coming! The Russians are Coming!  The AIDS HIV Virus is Coming!  The Ebola Virus is Coming!  The MERS, and mysterious viruses are Coming!…….The time has come for all good and loyal Americans to come to the aid of their country and defend The U.S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and Sovereignty. It’s time for Americans to stand up and legally and constitutionally protect and preserve this Great Republic established by the Rule of Law from being overrun by terrorists and illegals and secret legal and illegal traitors to our nation who are threatening us by their own admittance in speeches, actions, videos, lies, and Twitter.  If not, we could face the dangers that lurk ahead signed as excessive Executive Orders, which by-pass the Constitution and Congress and haven’t been defunded, repealed or nullified by Congress.  These unlawful E.O.’s must be Repealed, Defunded, and made Null and Void by Congress or there will be consequences for Americans.

Obama’s Dangerous E.O. 13295
The reason the Framers established only Congress can make laws is simple. They attempted to protect Americans from being ruled by one man elected as a U.S. President, butintentionally established “We The People” as the government and Congress as the Representatives of “We The People” to assure freedom.  A non-vetted U.S. President being granted the freedom to run rough shod over the U.S. Constitution, the Will of the American People, and Congressional members who are complicit,  is very dangerous to our sovereign Republic and the lives of Americans as we are currently witnessing.   Remember, the unlawful NDAA Law and the Patriot Act deny “due process of law” to Americans and provides for the indefinite detention of Americans only, not Muslims or Illegals. The Policies established by Bush and Obama written into the DHS/FEMA Directives of DHS/FEMA provides that they become a secret shadow government should a U.S. President call out a Pandemic or Civil Unrest and Martial Law. The secret shadow government according to their policies takes over the entire USA, both Federal and State governments. Obama’s Executive Order 13295 includes the unconstitutional quarantine for a cough, sneeze, respiratory illness, and fever, or pneumonia. This Executive Order, in my opinion, should be considered a dangerous path for Americans who would be subjected to indefinite detention.   (This raises the question if this is why they are importing Ebola and AIDs and viruses and diseases into the USA by plan and open borders).   In fact, Americans could lose their minor children to the state if Martial Law were called out due to civil unrest or a pandemic. Remember,  allowing viruses and diseases into the USA and leaving the border open, bad things could happen to good people if a fundamental transformation take place should this regime succeed at replacing the U.S. Military Officers through purging and recruiting illegals, thus creating a foreign military force.

How is it a non-vetted President’s Identification and Credentials aren’t of importance to the entire Federal Government or what is it they fear if a non-vetted President’s background, Identification, and Credentials were made transparent for public review which is required by state and federal Identification laws for taxpayer funded jobs and IRS purposes.  Is it that many Congressional members or Federal Public Servants would be held accountable as well for covering-up and protecting a man, not the U.S. Constitution and the American people?   Most recently, Obama ordered the Border Patrol to only shoot at suspects with pellets while the cartels and terrorists are armed to the hilt and his policy, in my opinion, risks additional American lives.  It’s unlawful to recruit foreign illegals into the U.S. Military by purging the U.S. Military of legal and loyal Americans, with the alleged intent of transforming the U.S. Military into a Foreign Army.  This brings me back to my point that a foreign army would have no problem if ordered by the federal government to indefinitely detain Americans or fire on Americans. How is it that the 110th through the 113th Congress are buying into the open border illegal foreign invasion knowing illegal war criminals and civilian criminals, terrorists, gang members, cartel members, viruses, and diseased persons are coming across the borders into the USA?  SHAME ON THEM!

Remember, an unarmed nation is a doomed nation! Gun Control is a Nazi Law! The act by the White House and Congress to allow the Department of Defense to arm foreigners and disarm Americans is what I consider in my opinion to be no less than tyranny waiting to happen.  Such actions in my opinion should be considered treason as the U.S. Army would be weakened and purged to the point of being “meaningless” as well as Obama’s declaration that the “Constitution” and the “Congress” are “meaninigless.”  As of 2014, he has succeeded at making America nearly “meaningless.”  The U.S. Civilian Militia is to be on-call and armed and ready to fight back against a tyrannical government and a foreign invasion as established by the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  But, if they enemy is already living on U.S. soil according to their videos and Tweets, should Americans not be prepared in case of an invasion by these foreign enemies.  After all, they state that they are crossing our borders under the current regime by invitation through the open borders.   Are the ISIS videos a warning of what’s coming to the USA as their leaders declare and as we witness the anti-American and anti-Humanity War Criminals dragging people into the streets and executing innocent people fleeing their homes?

WHAT IF?   What if America were left with a foreign army because Americans didn’t demand that Congress uphold the Second Amendment and uphold the U.S. Constitution, would that not mean the end of the USA? After all, we’ve already experienced admitted Jihad at Fort Hood, Boston, Benghazi, Fort Hood, Naval Base, Fast and Furious, along the borders, New Jersey, and let’s not forget where it began with Oklahoma, OKC, 911, WACO, Ruby Ridge.  And, the many of the same public servants were in office under the Clinton regime and remain in office today.  Below is a powerful video asking law enforcement and the U.S. Military to choose their side of the aisle for they are the leaders and the glue that We The People, need to stop infiltrators from succeeding.  Click on video below:  Police and Military-Time to Choose!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvf7wVsAp60

DONATIONS:  Appreciated by clicking on the Pay Pal Button at top of page to keep the radio shows, blogs, and books with invaluable information flowing for public review…..enlightenment, empowerment, and for educational purposes.

Please Share – Reblog – Follow  (you may use excerpts but please credit the writer, and please do not plagiarize)

Follow Rose Colombo on Facebook, LinkedIn, and http://www.fightbacklegalabuse; or http://www.Rose4Justice.com  and You Tube – Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse at http://www.amazon.com and Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks, and Radicals, political satire, at http://www.amazon.com – award winning and 5 Star Reviews.

Twitter@Rose4Justice; Stumbleupon, Pinterest, Google+, Tumblr, Digg

The Justice Club/Rose Colombo/Dynamic Guest, Dr. Alan Keyes Speaks Out/Freedomzer Worldwide Online Radio/podcasts

Rose Colombo, Talk Show Host and Author
Rose Colombo, Talk Show Host and Author

LISTEN TAPED LIVE:  Rose Colombo welcomes,Dr. Alan Keyes, as her special guest  as the producer and host of “The Justice Club” at Freedomizer Radio.  Dr. ALAN KEYES, graciously shares his knowledge and insight about Obama and the ObamaNation.  Dr. Keyes is an American Conservative Political Activist, author, former Diplomat, and perennial candidate for office.  A doctoral graduate of Harvard University, Dr. Keyes began his diplomatic career in the United States.  He received a Doctorate in Government Affairs from Harvard University before joining the Reagan administration.  He’s married and he has 3 children and lives in Long Island, New York.  Click on the link below – (Return and Like, Reblog,  and Comment Below on this site at http://www.rose4justice.wordpress.com)  Move the blue dial with your mouse to 90 minutes to begin the interview.

TLRoars / CthePower / Justice Club 11/06 by FreedomizerRadio | Current Events Podcasts.

Preview Image – Donations Appreciated to help with the research, writing, production of radio shows, videos, books, and Blogs with invaluable information presented for the world’s audience.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HM5V4XK5J8EP4

RADIO SHOW:  “ROSE COLOMBO N THE JUSTICE CLUB” – Listen to LIVE world wide online, podcasts, or call in at (347) 324-3704 – Get your questions ready and join in…..Rose Colombo N The Justice Club, MWF, 9a-10:30a pst and 12-1:30p est at http://www.freedomizerradio.com.  All shows taped live and archived with special guests at http://www.rose4justice.com

RADIO SHOW:  WOMEN FIGHT BACK:  Listen to Live online, Women Fight Back, Rose Colombo N Victoria Lee Scott, beauty experts provide beauty tips, stess relief exercises, women’s issues, quotes, and political rants – Listeon Live Worldwide OnLine,  podcasts, or Call and Listen or Comment at (347) 324-3804 – every Wednesday, 10:30-12pst-usa or 1:30-3p est  -freedomizerradio. com – all shows taped live and archived at freedomizerradio.com

Follow Rose Colombo or Rose4Justice

http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

http://www.rose4justice.wordpress.com

Twitter@Rose4Justice  – You Tube – FB/RoseColombo – Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice – Google+ – Pinterest – Tumblr – Digg – LinkedIn- FB/The Justice Club – FB/ Constittional Bar Association

Books, Irwin Award-Winner and 5 Star Reviews, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and political satire orwellian adventure story, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” coplimentary pages at http://www.amazon.com

 

 

“Obama’s Worldwide ‘War on Unborn Babies!’ Mandated Abortions is Depopulation!”

The Revolution Came and the USA Defeated Communism 1945!
The Revolution Came and the USA Defeated Communism 1945!

written by Rose Colombo, original pub. (c) 5/11/2012, Rev. 6/17/2012

“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?” Ronald Reagan, (pub. Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation) On or about February 18, 2009, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General stated, “There will be significant demographic changes this nation never faced…There will be no majority race in the United States in about 15 years…the coming diversity that could be such a powerful positive force will instead become a reason for stagnation and polarization.  Although, there is a crying need for all of us to know the contributions of Black Americans, the Black history month is still a testament to the problems that has inflicted African-Americans throughout our stay in the country….Black history is critical to the knowledge of the Black history experiment.”

Although, Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, addressed a majority of Black Americans and students at a college, his comments raise the question if his words reflected distinct statements which could reveal a sinister and secret U.N. Agenda 21 with a stated goal of reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015.  A major part of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal and Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” focuses upon mandated abortions in America and Third World nations at 50% by the year 2015. Ironically, the news recently disclosed that USAG Holder’s wife owns an abortion clinic which raises the question if Obama’s mandated abortion laws approved by senators Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry,  in 2007, and the fact that Holder worked under the Clinton administration, is a Conflict of Interest?

Mandated abortions combined with other depopulation agendas such as ObamaCare, which includes taxpayer-funded government mandated abortions in America, also allows for infanticide.  Is it possible that mandated Abortions could lead to government mandated abortions, not personal choice, which was implemented by Communist China for about 25 years?   China’s leaders determined the female unborn babies would be aborted under their mandated law for depopulation purposes or pregnant women would be punished for non-compliance.  Holder’s comments reflect Obama’s Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act aka New millennium Goals, which the non-vetted senator Obama implemented on or about December 7, 2007, and approved without the knowledge of the majority of U.S. citizens.

Should we not raise the question and ask if anyone would want their unborn baby or unborn grand baby to be used for food?  Is it morally right to allow corporations to grind up unborn babies aka fetuses and use them for food additives into artificial sweeteners?  Is that not to be considered as cannibalism?  How many people approve of aborted unborn babies  having their brains removed for experimentation as reported in the Orange County Register newspaper as a scandal by a major hospital?  Millions of people believe that it’s moral to use unborn babies for stem cell research or for cloning.   These statements are part of the reality relating to mandated abortions, which is downplayed by the Obama administration, Wall Street, and the media.

Obviously, mandated abortions increase taxes, and fund Planned Parenthood, and generate big-profits for abortionists, as well as some businesses within the food industry. On or about 2009, my blog informed U.S. citizens that Obama’s Global Poverty Act mandates worldwide abortions, which is in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21, a  goal to depopulate the earth at 50%, by the year 2015.   Senator Alan Keyes attempted to warn Americans that Obama’s agendas included radical programs.  In fact, Senator Obama failed to  disclose his obsession with mandated abortions during the elections which I refer to as “Obama’s War on Unborn Babies.”  He presented himself as a traditional family man with pro-life agendas when interviewed by Pastor Rick, who later on, incorporated Chrislam into his church.  The actions taken against unborn babies worldwide by the non-vetted U.S. Senator and President, Barack Hussein Obama, lead many to believe that he’s the most pro-abortion president to ever hit America.

Furthermore,  Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare also includes tax funded mandated abortions against the will of the majority of U.S. citizens. Once again, Obama signed the Global Poverty Act passed on or about December 7, 2007, and he signed it into law as an Executive Order on or about January 2009.  The Global Poverty Act is also known as The Millennium Global Goal and there wasn’t objection by the 111th or 112th U.S. Congress.  The reason for the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal to reduce the population of the planet under the guise of reducing world poverty and saving the planet.  Obama’s worldwide mandated abortion laws target not only the USA, but Third World nations, especially Africa. Obviously, if the federal government and the U.N. successfully reduce the population at 50% by 2015 or 90% by 2027, poverty would be nearly eliminated, but  so would mankind.  These programs won’t save the planet but destroy the planet.  This leads me to ask how many citizens are asking their leaders and the supporters of Agenda 21 on what authority are they secretly implementing a program that includes depopulation and who made them God with the right to determine who lives and who dies.

Recently, in the year 2012, Obama shouted out in the media that women’s rights should include taxpayer-funded entitlements and their right to access Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood abortion clinics.  He strongly promotes the right of young women to access free condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill.  Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the majority of democrats and Rhinos support tax funded  Planned Parenthood for-profit abortion clinics.  Abortion is big business!  It allows the federal government to substantially increase taxes for this big private corporation.  Planned Parenthood is similar to a manufacturing business that operates an assembly line of commodities, but in this case, the assembly line’s commodities are pregnant women and unborn babies.  Throughout history, mankind built businesses by hunting and killing animals, fishing, and harvesting trees or  plants for big profits.  But, Planned Parenthood is granted millions of tax dollars under ObamaCare to hunt for commodities known as pregnant women and unborn babies similar to a seamless assembly line for-profit.  It is the unborn babies who are becoming the extinct species on the planet.

Remember, there’s more than one way to depopulate the planet, but mandated abortions and same-sex agendas are definitely included as well as radiation.  It’s a fact that there’s more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black American communities than anywhere else in America.  It appears that Agenda 21 and the Obama administration’s mandated worldwide abortion agendas target the poor, ethnicities, religions, and races, and includes mandating worldwide abortions in Third World nations, such as Africa and India.  It appears that Obama’s Global Poverty Act is implemented as an Executive Order titled The Millennium Development Goal which appears to be in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21.  The unconstitutional laws implemented recently in the USA appear to be linked into Agenda 21, i.e., ObamaCare, the

Also, under the guise of women’s rights, the Obama administration is focusing on young women, pregnant women, and unborn babies, through the promotion of entitlements such as mandated abortions, and promoting contraception. The Obama regime targeted the Catholic Church and Catholic hospitals, who oppose abortion and the distribution of contraceptives and the morning after pill.  The Catholic Church filed a lawsuit against the federal government’s mandated abortions and distribution of contraceptives. Mandated Abortions offends the moral compass of the Catholic religion. Shall we not ask if the U.N.’s Agenda 21 is a program that intends to use U.S. leaders to circumvent the Constitution and the U.S. Congress?

It would appear that such an agenda is implemented to control the masses with the intent of creating a one world government.  It’s not possible to create a one world government if U.S. laws aren’t shredded or the borders aren’t opened up for the migration of foreigners.  How then is such an agenda not sending up red flags and shocking the minds of every U.S. citizen, as well as citizens around the world, especially citizens living in Third World Nations who are on the radar for depopulation? Furthermore,  Communist China mandated the death by abortion of 400,000,000 unborn baby girls for more than two decades.  Government mandated abortions is a genocide.  Mandated abortions reduces the population of  unborn babies who are the future citizens.  The U.N. and the U.S. didn’t oppose the mandated abortions in China.  In fact, if any  pregnant woman attempted to conceal the birth of a baby girl, they were punished.  And, the Chinese government’s mandated health care programs required the monitoring of young girl’s menstrual cycles.  Hillary Clinton and Diane Feinstein support the U.N.’s Rights of the Child which denies U.S. parents the right to exercise parental rights.  This means the all family law matters in the U.S. could be rendered under a U.N. flag versus a U.S. flag as the new one world court. 

Once again, the U.N. has been working hand in hand with past and current  U.S. Presidents and  supporting Congressional members, as well as  international leaders who approve of redistributing America’s wealth as well as reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015.  They are playing God and their goals include mandated abortions, infanticide and partial birth abortions.  They believe that the federal government should replace the parents.

Remember, the key supporters of Obama’s worldwide mandated laws were senators Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Clinton, and Kerry and a majority of representatives.  After the Global Poverty Act was signed into law, senator Obama immediately  filed the application to compete in the presidential race of 2008 even though he previously stated that he was too “inexperienced” to be a U.S. President. Consequently,  the U.N.’s Agenda 21 is known as a sustainable rural development program using U.S. tax dollars for the redistribution of America’s wealth with the alleged goal of  re-developing Third World nations by wealthy banksters.   The question should be pondered if the globalists are successful at depopulating the targeted nations how then shall mankind live, but only as slaves?  Thus, if there are traitors in the nation who are working to polarize and destroy America by comforting and abetting the enemy and supplying them with money and military defenses how then shall the American people stop this evil machine?

Also, there are rumors that the government might install vending machines into every school stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Well, Obama promised change and change has come to America under the guise of women’s rights, the war on terrorism,  and health care.  The truth is that the liberal agenda began back in the 1970s, when the feminists, who were mostly same-sex women, encouraged women not to have more than two kids.  The feminists influenced young married women that motherhood was a thankless job as well as being a housewife. The feminists managed to make young married women feel guilty about being a wife and mother and caused them to feel that they should be out working.   They encouraged young wives and mothers to get out of the house – get divorced – go out and work – under the guise of equal rights.   President Reagan, warned women that equal rights for women would result in a new struggle for women, especially single mothers, in the future.  He also warned against Pro-Choice laws. In fact, Americans criticize China for passing a law that says they can’t have more than one child, but we aren’t far behind telling American women not to have more than two kids and that they should abort their babies  instead of putting the babies up for adoption.

Americans complain there’s  fewer U.S. Natural Born Citizens on U.S. soil.  That’s true.  There are fewer births of U.S. natural Born citizens today, because foreigners don’t take contraceptives.  Most foreigners aren’t aborting millions of unborn babies.  They intend to have large families.  America has aborted about  70,000,000 plus babies since Roe v. Wade was approved and we disgusted by Hitler? We’re stabbing babies sin the head and ripping apart their body parts and selling them for profit and experiments, but we send people to jail for harming an animal, and yes, protect animals, but what about human beings?  We are killing our future U.S. Natural Born Citizens who are needed to preserve the United States of America for only the natural born citizens of a civilization can preserve their civilization, traditions, laws, culture, and sovereignty.

Furthermore, scientists and researchers around the world willingly use the fetuses for experiments, stem cell research, or cloning.  They are alleged to be selling body parts, organs, and human tissue which is against the law. Great Britain was the first country to receive licensing for cloning. It’s imperative that citizens of the world and Western civilization question if mandated abortions is a sinister program that is being carried out by the secret globalists under the guise of women’s rights. They appear to seek world power and control through unprecedented mandates that go against God, the Bible, and morality. These mandates include excessive regulations, and cruel and unusual taxation and  punishments with the intent of reaching their globalist goal with their hope for change and transformation of the USA and the world.  Is freedom and liberty and God-given unalienable rights an illusion, or is a One World Order an illusion. The goal of the globalist appears to be a one world superior race – slave vs. master – a one world leader –  and a collective global utopia? (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). Scroll Down to the bottom of the page to Like, Share, & Comment

Follow Facebook/Rose Colombo or
Facebook/The Justice Club – Twitter Twitter@Rose4Justice
Website http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Blogs: http://www.rose4justice.com
Books: Irwin Award Winner and 5 Star Review: Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help featured around the world -www.amazon.com
Books: Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals- 5 Star Political Satire – http://www.amazon.com
Radio: The Justice Club – MWF -9am-10:30am pst and 12-1:30pm est-usa -google Freedomizer Radio at blogtalkradio -listen worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-34704 – Follow – Share – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Public Speaker csontact Rose4Jusice@verizon.net – Rose has been a guest speaker at the L.A. Press Club Speakers Bureau, Granada Forum, Chambers of Commerce, DOJ Criminal Planning; California Senate, community groups, and the Pro-Justice Summit
Other: Social Media and You Tube

Which Constitutional Authority is Obama; Congress Using to Exempt Themselves; Foreigners, Unions, Refugees,Illegals from Paying Up Front for ObamaCare?

Take Back America!
Take Back America!

Rose Colombo – Rev. 4/11/2012, 3/30/2012 (C)

“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:  Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”

Wake up, America!  How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land?  It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a  restructured set of laws replacing  freedom and liberty, in my opinion.  ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive  mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!

In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must not go down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”

After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers.  A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a  baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period!  There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress. 

So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval?  Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself  – the authority to conceal his identity from the government  – and from the public.  It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval.  When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land?  This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval?  Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?

Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress  must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law?  This makes it very  difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing  Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge,  Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land  and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.

The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring  that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent  foreign and anti-American usurpers  from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President.  It is the birthright of every U.S.  Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected.  The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions,  and for the preservation of  Western Civilization so  future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.   

For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America.  He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions.  Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority. 

A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions.  Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education.  All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens. 

A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.” 

Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation?  It appears to me that the American people should be  very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially  Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law.  How is that?

Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections.  The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place.  In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.

Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit.  On the day of the inauguration about January 2009,  Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech.  Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV.  A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.

But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II,  the question remains if he intended  to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing   presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal?  Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself  the authority to conceal his identification records  from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented  in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals?  So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?  

Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder.  But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical?  After all,  Article II requires identification of  the public servant and proof  that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.      

On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws.  Thus, how is an  amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to  alter Article II to the 111th Congress and  seek Congressional approval?       

So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill,  to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record.  The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.    

 Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an  ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses.  After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor.  The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections.  And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual.   After the elections of 2008,  published records from the  Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record.  If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the  ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information. 

As I stated, this begs the question of  why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s  U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II  be considered  an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?   

These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth.  And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President.  Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.  

How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens.  ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved.  The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims,  SEIU union members,  possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals.  So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty,  then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?

In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.

ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation.  Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people  refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off  taxes of the hard working American citizens.  ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.

Therefore, I have three questions:  1)  How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and  U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or  lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress?  2)  How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress  or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records  for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people;  3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves  from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me  as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare?  (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices.  She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices.  Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com  – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –

Did Panetta Say That He and Obama Seek OK of Intern’l Powers to Deploy Troops; Declare War; Forget the U.S. Congress?

Rose Colombo, author, Political Activist &, Legal Consultant for Justice
Rose Colombo, author, Political Activist &, Legal Consultant for Justice

by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder

Did  Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t  any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?  

In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about  March 2012.  Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly.  Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?

Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants;  but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future.  Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?

Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law.  For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter?  The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive.  So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety  since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty?  Also, the attacks on Libya,  in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.

Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies?  Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority?  Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?

Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution.  He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States

Rep.  Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree.  Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal  basis.”  He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”

Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act.  He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.

Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.”  He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you.  If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.

Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.”  Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis.  Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that.  If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here.  We want to build an international support.

Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat.  Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution.  Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by  Panetta’s statements.

Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.

So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress?  Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution.  It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.

In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?

The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175).   It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it.  They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere.  For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion.  I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another.  I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.”  In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of  Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.

Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers?  How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as  Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends.   How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place?  At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and  the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.

Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation.   How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution?  For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder,  without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price.  If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?

Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution?  Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or  2 men the right to knight themselves with  absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen?  Obama called the attack on Libya,  a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days.  Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the  answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?

In conclusion,  if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country.  If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern,  it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.

Furthermore, if  the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion?  America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders  conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?

How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law  rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA?  By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial?  Even a guilty person should be given a trial!  In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now.  The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds.  The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as  potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only.  By the way, how is that even legal in America?  It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws.  Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages!  Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Click the like button and leave a comment, please.  You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit   Disclaimer:  Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Thanks for the read…..

Did Congress Declare the ‘Homeland’ and ‘World’ to be a “Battlefield,” if so, when did Congress Declare War? Obama said, “America is Not, and Never Will Be at War with Islam!”

Obama declared America to be a "battlefield," not a Christian nation of peace!
Obama declared America to be a “battlefield,” not a Christian nation of peace!

written by Rose Colombo – original (c) pub.  12/28/2011, rev. 12/13/2013

Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution.  It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.

Recently on CNN, the Intel Chairs, including Senator Feinstein, stated that America is less safe today than we were before 2009 or after 911.  How is it that America is vulnerable to attack in 2013 when they had the opportunity to refuse to pay Iran $7B of US taxpayer money every year with knowledge that they are building possible nuclear weapons and that their former leader, Ahmadinejad and many other Muslim Brotherhood members or groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would wipe Western Civilization – America and Israel – off the face of the map?

The most alarming statement ever made during my life time, which should have rocked the nation, came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein, who said congress and the non-vetted  President Obama implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows:  “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of  American citizens without charge or trial.”  Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.

How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government to be targeted anywhere around the world if “accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all “due process of law?”  Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, “The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.”  Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing words included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senators Graham and John McCain stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution? 

Remember, Judge Napolitano stated, NDAA “shreds” the U.S. Constitution even though Obama and Congress swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen,  not charge a citizen.  Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military?  So, has the 111th and 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without “due process of law,” there is no justice!  There is only the possibility for tyranny and death or enslavement.  The political satire recently released on amazon.com, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, alerts mankind to the dangers of Obamacare and the Redistribution of  America’s wealth with fictional characters that parallel today’s Orwellian state of affairs.

 Hear ye!  Hear ye!  All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story,  along the lines of  War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members – elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars, who voters and taxpayers  believed as having the highest level of  integrity and  loyalty to the United States of America.  America is a Republic and has been established as a Republic implemented by the Rule of Law, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, so let’s pray that the NDAA Law ends up to be no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible lack of communication, right?   Unfortunately, it is real!   I have posted videos online with a special guest and Patriot, Anthony J. Hilder,, who warned Americans back in the late 1990s, that there were people, who intended to imprison more Americans,  especially Blacks, eventually use them for racial tension then as slaves in the prisons,  but then again – it appears that any American can be a potential target today, since the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, Kill List using drones or whatever, and the foreign invasion  of a majority of radical males, as well as the implementation of Obamacare that denies health care in most cases and mandates taxpayer funded abortions, death panels, mandated vaccines, micro-chips, and basically, death to Americans.  And there is the Executive Order signed by President Bush in 2005 and Obama under his reign that wipes out the Constitution, Sovereignty, USA, and allows for the indefinite detention of all Americans should a President call out Civil Unrest or a Pandemic and Martial Law on U.S. soil which is totally unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, and outside of their job duties for which they are elected and taxpayer funded. It’s calle treason.

The  NDAA law includes sections 1031 and 1032 and brings back memories of  Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America”  and failed to address himself as the President of the United States of America.  Why would he do that?   It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’ seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles.  Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor by wiping out the Middle Class and creating a nation of the wealthy citizens and a nation of  poor citizens.   And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the  “homeland” to be nothing more than a “battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as “enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” only  and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law.”  Or should we ask if the Obama regime are granting to themselves the authority to kidnap Americans on domestic or foreign soil without due process of law and without public scrutiny so that the persons kidnapped under the NDAA law would have no contact with the outside world?  The usurping of the 4th Amendment, due process of law, by writing a new law to unconstitutionally by-pass due process of law, eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.  

The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads:  “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens.  It does.”

Oh, no, it can’t can’t be possible for U.S. Congressional members to deny due process of law knowing it’s unconstitutional, right?   We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of  their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most  importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right?  Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and either laid down their lives or would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments, for which our U.S. laws are rooted, and the word of God expressed in the Bible, as well as the definition of our laws defined in the book, the “Law of Nations.”

 Yes, it is true!  Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA as stated by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.) on national television.  The NDAA’s, sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter – did not include Americans – but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law.  It’s alleged to have been passed without the congressional members knowing the law included Americans, but pressured by the non-vetted President Obama to include Americans, a very disturbing thought, indeed.  Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein, McCain, Levin, and Graham as well as the mostly democratic congressional representatives, as well as Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 – and did not strike those unconstitutional sections –  from the law titled  NDAA-S.1867.  The NDAA law, shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment, based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.” 

Now is the time to demand to answers as to  how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every citizen, legal or illegal, on U.S. soil as some people allege our government is under some sort of threat and are working allegedly under some sort of fear written by alternative writers.  So, hasn’t the president and the Congress violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution?  How is it that Senator Graham and Senator McCain as ell as other representatives  declaring that the “world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war?  Thus, they would have to declare war against the country they swore to protect!  Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that “people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?”  Also, how is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” – an ugly law titled, the  National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of  Sections 1031 and 1032). This should be worrisome to Americans considering the majority of Americans want a new “vetted” president, as they are watching the race card being played out, knowing that such actions could cause civil unrest.

Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”  

As I state in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” that “without “Due Process of Law, Article, IV, there is nothing!  There is nothing but tyranny!”  Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people who are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking  justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law.  It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”  

Americans must write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, refuse to reveal the “charges.” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial,”  and deny American citizens  access to a civilian court guaranteed to  U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the  NDAA-S.1867 law, while providing due process of law to captured Middle East foreign radicals of 911 and other attempted plots against America.

Again, Senator Feinstein stated that sections 1031 and 1032 are included targeting Americans for indefinite detention saying,  “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.”  Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard.  So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief?  But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power.

Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a  U.S. soldier of a crime.  Although, there are journalists stating that this law,  Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t  include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today.  In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases.  Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into  the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, “So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.”  He said, “Yes, they are still in effect.” 

Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, “Don’t be
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.” 

So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?”  Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?

Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?”  One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world.  The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare.  During WWII, the Nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being “extremists.”  So,  sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.    

In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’ including the homeland.”  How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” as Sections 1031 and 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government, who can be detained indefinitely, as “enemy combatants” and denied “due process of law?”  It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from the NDAA Law and Sections 1031 and 1032 which they have dished out for the American people.  After all, they shoved the unread  Obamacare down the throats of Americans, who objected, while taking bribes for votes and making backroom deals, but didn’t feel it was good enough for Congress, so they exempted themselves holding themselves above the laws of the land they mandated.  They wrote loopholes into the laws making “Insider Trading”  legal for congressional members, but illegal for American citizens, who they send to jail and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal. 

On the other hand,  how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for law makers?  It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office exempt themselves and hold themselves above the laws they mandate \and  dish out for the American people.  

 On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then  one must ponder who is America battling on a daily basis?  It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!”  Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who the U.S. federal government is  battling or at war with if not Islam who attacked Americans on 911 and murdered Americans and continue to threaten Americans?  In fact, there are radicals from Mexico and from the Middle East,  who gained citizenship and swore to pledge allegiance to the U.S and the U.S. flag stand on U.S. soil and state that they will eliminate Western Civilization, democracy, and dominate America which is prohibited by U.S. Constitutional law, but Americans have been arrested for praying on public sidewalks including heterosexuals who are dancing or kissing in public. since 2009.

Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.”  Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground.  Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. I guess politicians can spin the laws in any direction that suits them, but not so for the American citizens.  The NATO mission against  Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the  assassination of Gaddafi.  The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried.  It’s “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrannical leaders of Communist and Third World national.  In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].” 

Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of al-awalki, an converto to radical Islam, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.”  But, he was denied “due process of law” and to the best of my knowledge, never charged with a crimes before he was taken out under Obama’s regime. Think about  that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of any and all Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?”  Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of law and render Americans  live on U.S. soil today without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant?  One must ponder if a Tea Party member, or an Oathkeeper, or a Christian, Catholic, heterosexual, a Patriot, pro-Constitutional American, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-God, pro-right-to-life, and pro-Free Enterprise be targeted?

For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.” 

Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally released after he was  denied “due process of law” on U.S. soil as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.

David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and he could have been served with a subpoena or arrested, but instead American women, children, and men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration, except for the people who escaped.  What crimes did the women and children and unborn babies commit, but  even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil and a government becomes similar to a “mob rule.”

Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. The respected Constitutional Lawyer, Gerry Spence, stepped up to the plate in his defense.

Therefore, Americans must ask, “What happened to the Udall Bill that was proposed and would shred Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law?”

Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes.  Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right?  In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.

How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a “water boarding ” policy after 911.  Should we not as – which is worse?  Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and  denying “due process of law that indefinitely detains any citizen – innocent or guilty – on U.S. soil? – or an implementing a “hit” list of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world based on an accusation only?

On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.”  And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.”  Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.

Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”  So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war on Libya?  And, which nation is the “homeland” battling?  We should ask under which  authority is congress applying that provides congressional members the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny “due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032?  ***(This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, an Irwin Award winning writer,poet, and author whose been published around the world as a 5 Star Review.  Colombo’s first shocking self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” published late 2010 on amazon reveals the truth about the illusion of justice and how easily anyone can be targeted by the government and their lives destroyed.  The second book, a fictional political Orwellian satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” exposes the U.N.’ redistribution of health and wealth and begs the question if the dinosaurs were depopulated or made extinct.

Rose Colombo has been featured in “The Journal of Commerce and Science” worldwide magazine; The Veterans Reporter; The Daily Law Journal published for lawyers and judges; Orange County Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post, L.A. Times, Seal Beach Journal, and more….interviewed on major and local radio and TV and produced and hosted her own created cable TV and am-FM and online radio shows with prominent guests.  She is currently on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice, and social media.

Colombo’s website:    www.colombochronicles.com

Blogs:  www.rose4justice.com

 

 

Grievance: DOJ Tracking Law Abiding Americans, but Not Cartel Members using U.S. Recovery Fund: “Hit” Lists: Missing Guns?!!

Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!
Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!

written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub.  10/19/2011

We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009.  Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members  between 2009 – 2011.  The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.

Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit”  list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government?  It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens.  If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law?  A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!

Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008:  “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies.  It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members.  There are hundreds of missing guns!

Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the  American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.”  Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money.  The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.

How is it that the Obama czars,  the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,  and the Homeland  Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?

We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley.  We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation.  More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.

Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into  Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.

The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:

1.  1992:  Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.

2.  2000:  Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits.  She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign.  She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.

3.  March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.

4.  March 25, 2004:  SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)

5.  July 29, 2005:  S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing

6.  September 2005:  Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune

7.  2006:  Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the  BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]

8.  2008:  New York Times:  “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].

9. October 20, 2008:  Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

10.  March 13, 2009:  Gun Ban List:  HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.

11.  L.A. Times 3/27/2009:  “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”

Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”

“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”

12.   March 2009:  Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A.  Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%].  They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.

13.  March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.

14.  May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.

15.  August 14, 2009:  CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1:  “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”

16.  August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2:  Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.

17.  June 28, 2010:  The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”

18.  July 20, 2010:  The Examiner by Howard Portney read:  “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”

Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest;  or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?

19.  May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.

20.  June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’  Clinton said in an interview.  “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”

21.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council.  The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.

22.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.

23.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights:  She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.

24.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders:  Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts.  She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.

25.  September 2, 2010:  Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics.  [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]

26.  January 8, 2011:  Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents.  Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.

27.  Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury.  He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.

28.  January 8, 2011:  LiteNews.com –  U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life.  Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush.  He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner.  Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been  postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency.  The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll.  Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.

29. February 23, 2011 Letter:  Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”

30.   February 2011 Letter posted on-line:  Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico.  “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”

31.  June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein:  “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations.  This administration routinely ignores subpoenas.  The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.”  [2009].

32.  May 23, 2011:  CNN seen on You Tube video:  Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks.  [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)

33.  2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.

On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America.  On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body.  On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki.  Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?”  These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.

In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date,  as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens.  The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future.  **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).

The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review.  Read Reviews and complimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

Can Americans Be Placed On Govt “Hit” List? Isn’t that A Conspiracy to Commit Murder By Denying Due Process of Law? What’s the Difference?

By Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/13/2011, Rev. 4/7/2012, 2017

Hooray for Hollywood!  Liberal Democrats gathered support for the unvested president Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, who promised to bring “change” to America.  At a Hollywood event, Obama stated to the audience that he was going to attack them with drones and they laughed.  He said, “You think I’m joking.”  Well, I never think he’s joking!  And the audience continued to laugh and applaud.  Today, Americans are faced with a unvested president who allegedly holds himself above congressional and constitutional law and seems to ignore our democratic process.  America is a  Republic which is operated according to  the Rule of Law.

Furthermore, the  news reported Obama is appointing a panel to create a secret “kill list” of  U.S. Citizens, who could be murdered by assassination, based on Obama’s accusation only or his non-vetted Czars and possibly his Muslim Brotherhood appointees.  They could accuse Americans living on  foreign or domestic soil.  U.S. Citizens could be accused of being “dangerous” or  “right-wing extremists” which is based upon political and religious affiliations, activism, and published writings or accused of being a  dissident. In other words, Americans will be denied their U.S. Constitutional rights to exercise “due process of law” guaranteed by the 4th Amendment.  Guilty as charged even if innocent!  Isn’t that how tyrannical dictators and communist dictators operate by punishing people who oppose their government’s laws, mandates, and regulations?  Compliance vs. non-Compliance?  So, if a secret “kill” list is enacted allowing the executive branch to target Americans for assassination without due process of law, would that include witnesses and whistleblowers who would testify against the government?

Remember, that the NDAA law reflects the tyrannical laws inflicted upon citizens of  Third World nations ruled by a tyrannical leader with an iron fist, not constitutional laws.  In other words,  Congress has created a new law titled NDAA which shreds due process of law equally important with Article II, but under NDAA, due process of law is the most important law inserted into the U.S. Constitution for it is the only law that prevents tyranny and genocide.  Is everyone in Hollywood still laughing?  In fact, the news reported  most recently,  Homeland Security has been instructed to fly drones over America and spy on the American people!

Although, the president’s Executive Order allegedly provides himself with the unprecedented authority to pick and choose which Americans on foreign or U.S. soil will be accused and labeled killed or assassinated, the U.S. Congress, who is the only body that can make and approve laws, is silent!  They are allowing the nation to be run by excessive Executive Orders without congress exercising the fiduciary duty and upholding the 14th Amendment as required by law.  In fact, the 112th Congress led by senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham implemented the NDAA law that targets Americans for assassination and indefinite detentions through Congress which shocked the American taxpayers!  Yet, congress exempts themselves from unconstitutional and unread laws since 2009.

Recently, the news reported that Obama ordered a “hit” on an American citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki  who the government reported dead, but the government also stated that they didn’t retrieve the body, but how is it they didn’t retrieve the body for positive identification?  Although, al-Awlaki converted to the Muslim faith and spoke out heatedly against American policies, there weren’t any criminal charges filed against him by the U.S. government.  He wasn’t armed or captured and he wasn’t provided due process of law, although he allegedly had been reported to have visited the Pentagon without incident where he could have been arrested.   Shockingly, al-Awlaki’s assassination and his minor child’s assassination occurred prior to the approval of the NDAA Law.  Shouldn’t this beg the question which constitutional authority Obama and his administration used to provide the executive office with  authority to write an Executive Order granting a U.S. President the right to assassinate any  American accused as an enemy of the government even if they could be captured?   Yet, al-Awlaki’s killing and that of his minor child, were ordered before the NDAA Law was enacted and while due process of law  was intact.  In fact, the NDAA law circumvents constitutional law.

Therefore, which constitutional authority was applied that provided the executive branch to by-pass due process of law and the judicial branch and order “hits” on  American adult and an American minor child and how is the NDAA Law in the best interest of the majority of the American people?  The NDAA law defies due process of law guaranteed by  U.S. Constitution.  Also, the anti-war.com blog is an article that states “Obama has Gaddafi’s 16-year-old son, friends killed at dinner,” but this information is very difficult to find in main stream news as many articles and videos are being made unavailable for public scrutiny.

Also, Obama is named in a myriad of eligibility lawsuits filed by attorneys, i.e., Philip J. Berg, esq., and Orly Taitz, esq.,  as well as other prominent lawyers and military officers, and Sheriffs alleging that there are numerous computer experts alleging Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries. The news reported that FBI complaints have been filed by computer experts.  Ironically, Obama  has allegations filed against him with the courts and FBI, yet he was allowed to order a “hit” on al-Awlaki and his minor child, who didn’t have any criminal charges filed against them at the time Obama ordered the assassination of  unarmed American citizens versus ordering their capture.  So, why is Congress remaining silent on the NDAA law that targets Americans based on accusation only, which opens the door to legal abuse and possibly wrongful murders?

  • Americans should be demanding to know why congress is silently allowing  Obama to rule the nation by Executive Order through excesses of  mandates and  requirements, excessive regulations, excessive taxation, unconstitutional punishment and excessive penalties making the Middle Class poorer while Obama approves in excess of $1 billion in U.S. tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood with knowledge that their stated strategic goal is to wipe out Israel and Western civilization,  Executive Orders were not intended to be used and abused so one man could rule the United States of America without congressional or constitutional authority and redistribute the wealth to foreign ant-American nations.  The congress and DOJ are trampling on the Rule of  Checks and Balances.  Americans are witnessing all three branches of government morphing into one branch of government.  The Obama Nation!
  • Congress  allowed a non-vetted man with a foreign-born father and Subject of Britain to grant himself absolute power by writing and approving a myriad of Executive Orders from day one after taking office, but under which constitutional or state law is it that provides a public servant the legal right to conceal his identity and credentials from all branches of the federal government and the government, We The People ?  President Obama approves excessive Executive Order and by-passes congress and usurps constitutional authority.
  • Obama  declared  his excessive Executive Orders as the new laws of the land.  Obama and congress usurped due process of law by approving the NDAA Law as well as approving an extension of the Patriot Act.  Due Process of Law is the only constitutional law established for the prevention of tyranny and  genocide.  In fact, Obama’s excessive signing of Executive Orders  caused congressional members, Dan Lundgren and Ron Paul to state on the record, on the congressional floor ,that Executive Orders are not laws.  The only reason that Congress is silent, in my opinion, is that they approve of Obama’s usurping the congress and constitution by Executive Order or else they would exercise their authority and Repeal and Defund.

Well then, how is it possible for a non-vetted  president to use tax dollars without congressional approval and appoint a panel of federal government non-vetted Czars paid by U.S. taxpayers to create a “hit list” that’s intended to murder Americans by  assassination without Due Process of Law as well as eliminate due process of law from  the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees U.S. Natural Born and long time generational legal citizens the right to access their Miranda Rights, and a lawyer.  Yet, the Obama administration and USAG, Eric Holder insist that the Muslim Radicals involved in 911 or other criminal acts be read Miranda Rights and provided Due Process of Law.  On the other hand, U.S. Natural Born Citizens if accused of being an enemy combatant are denied their constitutional rights to exercise Due Process of Law by implementing the NDAA law as well as the Patriot Act.

In other words, the NDAA law prohibits Americans accused by the U.S. government of being an enemy combatant from accessing charges filed, a lawyer, a trial or appeals as reported in the news by Senator Feinstein.  In other words, if U.S Natural Born Citizens are accused of being a “dissident,” they could accused and  punished and left to rot in a jail cell.

Therefore, Americans must ask under which constitutional authority and fiduciary job duty is the 112th Congress or Obama applying that provides them the authority to shred due process of law and implement the NDAA law.  The NDAA law or Patriot Act isn’t in the best interest of the American people, but could result in their demise or punishment.  It’s crucial that U.S. citizens who are the taxpayers  peacefully resist and denounce the federal government using U.S. tax dollars to implement the assassination of American citizens, unarmed Americans, who could be accused of being an enemy combatant on U.S. or foreign soil.  So, are Americans being forced to pick up the tab for the Muslim Brotherhood to continue their stated strategic goals against Western Civilization. Are Americans being forced to  pay for the possibility of their own assassinations and indefinite detentions if targeted by the Obama regime? Even more amazing is that Americans are paying the wages to employ the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House!  How is this possible?

Remarkable as it is – Americans and Brits are losing their constitutional freedom and liberty.  Actually, I read that the lineage of British royalty is tied to Germany and that several members of  British royalty married Germans and embraced the nazis.  The articles read that British Royalty changed their German names to English surnames during WWII as the English people intensely opposed the Nazi’s.

So, it shouldn’t surprise the Brits if they do their homework to realize  how their government may have been infiltrated subtly with public servants who oppose freedom and liberty.  Most recently, Obama toasted his allegiance to the queen which hit international news.  He obviously upset the Queen as she scolded him and stopped him, realizing that his allegiance is supposed to be to the United States of America,  but then he is a British Subject. He admits that his father comes from a long line of Muslims and his dad, Barack Obama was born as an African in Kenya and  Kenya was a Colony of Britain making Obama sr. a Subject of  Britain meaning Obama inherited his fathers birthright at birth in 1961 as a Subject of Britain under the  British Nationality Act of 1948; thus, Obama did not inherit a U.S. Natural Born Citizen birthright from his foreign-born father, but a foreign-born birthright.  And, being a African from Kenya and a British subject does not tie him to the civil rights movement of the Black Americans, who were slaves, and known as non-persons until they were freed.

Therefore,  how is it that a U.S. President and a U.S. Congress could even consider establishing laws that usurp “due process of law” for the American citizens who elected them and pay their taxpayer funded wages which is contrary to their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution.  How is it that they’re OK with compiling secret “kill” lists of Americans based upon accusation only who may be 100% innocent to be killed on domestic or foreign soil including minor children?  Are Americans being used as sacrifices for political or religious reasons? 

Furthermore  a “hit” list refers to murdering people by assassination, the word murder is switched to read “assassination” because it has a connotation that the person is a criminal who is being murdered without due process of law, but based upon accusation only. Just the fact that the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice would even consider “hit lists” and assassinations and shredding of the U.S. Constitution is evil, immoral, unconstitutional, and disgraceful in the United States of America!  Our Forefathers must be turning over in their graves.

How then shall we refer to the Obama assassination “hit” list?  Will  Obama and his panel  decide who shall be murdered by assassination based on an accusation only?  Isn’t denying due process of law  what the Communist Chinese do to their citizens? Nope, Obama and Congress didn’t agree to an assassination list targeted at  foreign enemy nations or countries such as Kenya or Afghanistan, Iran, or China, Syria, Libya, Iraq or South  Korea, and so forth, but they’re targeting American citizens, who pay Obama’s wages of $400,000 per year, as well, as pick up the unlimited tab for his excessive $100,000,000  vacations.

How is it American’s aren’t asking how is it logical for  the federal government to implement an unconstitutional program and create a “hit” list that targets American citizens as potential enemies and place their names on “hit lists” for assassination, while exempting foreigners, foreign immigrants, refugees, and illegals?  Is the U.S. federal government trampling on their “limited” powers while stepping on the U.S. Constitution with their “Big Foot” and creating a new business using U.S. tax dollars for programs which might be viewed as “guns for hire” making U.S. Natural Born Citizens a commodity for profit by “hit” men?  After all, the DOJ under Obama’s watch used U.S. Stimulus tax dollars to purchase U.S. untracked guns and sell them to untracked cartel members  in Mexico!  It seems that Obama’s programs always create fear and increase taxes because he leads people to believe that he must  save the nation by creating more national debt!  In 2008, his Chicken Little speech, “The sky is falling” – actually worked. Well, President Bush left a national debt headed upwards of one trillion dollars, but Obama spent $5 Trillion in 2 1/2 years!

Some people may say, “Yes, but some times, really bad people should be murdered so this way, we can just get rid of them.”

The Rule of Law  is established for a reason.  Innocent people are murdered and die from time to time by law enforcement, but officers are held accountable, so people are protected from wrongful deaths.  But under the NDAA Law, is it legal for the non-vetted  president and his non-vetted czars to target Americans without recourse?

The Nazis started off with one name on their “hit” list And, after the first “hit” was completed and the people said nothing, they went onto the second name on the list and the people said nothing.  Afterwards, it became easier and easier until millions were dragged out of their homes by gun point (which has happened on US soil) and murdered the people who were too frightened to speak out as the army grew bigger and bolder and more insensitive to murdering people.  So, Hitler was emboldened as he was unopposed. He created his National Civilian Security Force and they marched into each city and forced their way into the privacy of the citizen’s homes and dragged them into the street and either executed them or enslaved them into concentration camps because they were good people who did nothing to stop them when the writing was on the wall.

In 2001 and 2008, Obama stated that congressional and constitutional authority is “meaningless.”  Think about that!  Why would a U.S. President boldly state that the U.S. constitution is “meaningless” after swearing an oath to uphold the constitution?  He said, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than a “mere charter of negative laws [liberties} that need to be changed” in 2001, 2008 and 2012, but those videos and articles are probably scrubbed from the internet as well.

Of course, people may ask, “Who cares?”  He says he’s an American and said that he was born in Hawaii and that’s good enough for me.”  Well, then why isn’t it good enough for all illegals just to say that they were born in the United States?  The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen must be adhered to so a foreigner can’t usurp the presidency and insert foreign laws, foreign history into U.S. history books, and foreign religions that force Americans to comply or else be punished on U.S. soil!  This is how anti-American foreign enemies change and transform a nation into their nation while the people sleep, they conspire.

Remember, “Every congressional member and public servant pledges their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, not to a public servant.  But, today, the congress, senate, and judiciary appear to be more concerned with protecting public servants from the Constitution than protecting the Constitution from public servants.” (C) 1989

You may say, “But,  public servants can’t assassinate American citizens or throw them into prisons without due process of law in America.”

Of course, many people ask, “Who cares if Obama or Panetta ordered the murder by assassination of a war criminal whose name is Osama bin Laden?”  He was  the mastermind behind murdering 3,000 Americans on 911, so who cares about due process of law?  In other words, those people believe in a barbaric lynch mob and mob rule, but it is “Due Process of Law,  which sets America apart from the rest of the world.

(Yet, has anyone asked how many people, victims, whistleblowers and witnesses, or First Responders have died because of 911 between 9/11/01 and 2013?)

But, I tell you that the Rule of Law should not be violated unless you don’t care that you or your loved ones names can be placed on a “hit” list!  The U.S. Constitution is what protects the guilty and the innocent from tyranny and mob rule executions and preserves a civilized nation.  Could this be an ungodly and immoral agenda with the intent of sensitizing Americans so they ignore the stories similar to the rumors that rang out in Europe when the people did nothing, while they watched millions of people executed, enslaved, imprisoned, experimented upon, and exterminated?

Should a nation of U.S. Natural Born Citizens not demand that their U.S. Congress repeal and deny funding for  illegal and unconstitutional or immoral laws that target Americans for indefinite detentions and assassinations based on accusations while these lawmakers exempt themselves from the same tyranny that they approve?   How then would Americans know if they are targeted as an “extremist” or “radical” or “dangerous?”  Does the list consist of  Christians, or Catholics and Jews?   Does the list include heterosexuals or citizens who believe in pro-life or traditional marriage?  Does the hit list consist of citizens who are Conservatives and Republicans or Libertarians? Does the “hit” list include Blacks or Hispanics or Whites or Italians or Jews?  Does the “hit” list include Pregnant Women or Sick or Disabled?  How about the Elderly, Veterans or U.S. Military who lets say believe in God or read the Bible?  Does the list include members of the  Tea party or the Oath Keepers?  How then shall the American people know which citizen names will be added to the “hit” list by the panel consisting of non-vetted Czars?

Of course, you may ask, “Who cares about Article II, anyway?  Who cares if a President of the United States is a “U.S. Natural Born” citizen?

Furthermore, Article II is the most important law of the land!    There is a legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen that clarifies that if a baby is born on U.S. soil and one parent  is foreign-born then the baby is not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be a  U.S. President – Period!  The baby doesn’t inherit a U.S.  Birthright from their foreign-born father as required by U.S. law, but inherits a foreign-born birthright from his or her father making the baby a “naturalized” citizen only. The birthright guarantees U.S. Natural Born Citizens the right and privilege to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but if a usurper steals a U.S. Natural Born Citizen’s Birthright and is elected as a U.S. President,  then that person has denied a U.S. Natural Born Citizen their natural-born Birthright, who is legally eligible, to be a U.S. President.  A U.S. Natural Born Citizen Birthright must be cherished and upheld to preserve Western Civilization for it is preserved by our forefathers as a right to be an eligible U.S. President and this is the key that separates U.S. Natural Born Citizens from all Naturalized citizens.

Ironically, to my knowledge, there aren’t any senate hearings scheduled  for an investigation into the assassination of an unarmed American  and his minor child who should have been protected under the U.S. Constitution with the right to exercise due process of law, but were assassinated, prior to the NDAA being enacted.   

I think we all agree that Osama bin Laden was a dangerous leader who is reported to target America on 911.  His death was reported to have been killed or died from kidney disease 9 different times in the news by political leaders between Dec. 2001 and 2012.  Even a former CIA agent stated that Osama’s body was on ice and those reports were in the news between December 2001 -2011.  Admittedly, Obama and or Panetta ordered the assassination of the unarmed Osama sitting in a living room holding a remote versus his capture and tried.  The news reported that Obama and Panetta ordered Osama’s  body dumped into the ocean and called it a burial at sea which upset the Muslim nation.  The government published photos of Osama’s assassination, but later retracted them stating  all the photos were fakes.  I read that Muslims don’t bury their leaders at sea.  The news alleged Obama ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean [and fed to the sharks]. The fact that Osama wasn’t captured, even though he was unarmed, or his dead body not turned over to the proper law enforcement authorities for positive examination, left doubt in the minds of the world, especially since the assassination occurred right before elections.

The news reported that Obama and Biden were reported in the news to have exposed the identities of the Navy Seal heroes which is unprecedented.  Prior to 2009, the government wanted war criminals captured alive, if at all possible, so they could interrogate them and extract information which is what President Bush ordered after 911. For example, if a law enforcement officer killed a suspect then dumped the suspect’s body into the ocean, even if the suspect was considered an evil person, the police officer would probably be sitting in a jail cell.  Now, we’ll never know what Osama or Al-Awlaki or his teenage son, or Gaddafi or his teenage son, grandkids, and family knew about the radicals attacking the USA and declaring war on America on September 11, 2001.

Of course, people may ask, “But, who cares if he dumped Osama’s body at sea?”

Again, the Rule of Law must be followed by every citizen including public servants if justice is to prevail.  The U.S. federal government spent billions of tax dollars over 10 years for the capture of Osama bin Laden.  But, Obama and Panetta’s assassination orders reported in the news of foreign leaders should send shivers down the spine of every leader in every nation, as none of the assassinated leaders involved were armed at the time of their murders.  In fact, al-Awlaki was an American, who wasn’t charged with a crime.  On the other hand,  Libyan leader, Gaddafi, didn’t attack America. So, how does anyone know who could be next victim, whether a foreigner or an American citizen, under the NDAA Law approved by the 112th Congress and Obama.  For example, could an enemy be seen as a whistleblower or a witness?  The NDAA law leaves massive room for abuse.

Of course you may ask, “If a U.S. President thinks someone is a danger to the government then he should put a “hit” out on him?”

The Rule of Law in America makes it clear that a “hit” list and gathering names of Americans to be placed on a “hit” list in my opinion equates to a conspiracy to commit murder usually thought of as some thing a “gang” or “organized criminals” or mafia or cartels do.  “Hit” lists are utilized by criminals and shouldn’t be used against America’s  law-abiding Americans accused by their government without probable cause and a search warrant and due process of law.  This is why this nation established due process of law to protect the innocent.  We have a Department of Justice which many believe has turned into a department of injustice.

Of course, people may say, “Who cares if Obama had Osama murdered by  assassination, after all, he was a war criminal. Besides, it would cost millions of tax dollars to try him.” 

I stress, the Rule of Law must be followed in a Republic. Think about that!  If it’s okay to assassinate unarmed people without constitutional or congressional authority then what’s to prevent a government from assassinating whistleblowers and witnesses and call it legal so the witnesses can’t testify against public servants or prominent people in courts of law?  It could establish a pattern that it’s the right of the government to decide who is an enemy and silence people or dump their bodies into the ocean or shred the evidence. It would have been interesting to learn what details that  Osama and Gaddafi could have provided to the world that may have shed some light on the radicals or 911.

But people say, “Who cares if Obama ordered the murder by assassination of al-Awlaki, he was a very bad man.”

Should the U.S. Congress and judiciary fail to investigate the facts in the Osama and al-Awlaki assassinations then how shall the truth and the facts be reported for public review or how shall you defend yourself if accused under the NDAA law?

Of course, many people will ask, “Who cares if Obama attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and killed his grandkids and freedom fighters, he was a very bad man”  without the approval of the U.S. Congress or constitutional authority?

And, once again, I stand firm  that the Rule of Law must be strictly followed or Americans shall reap the tears of tyranny should the citizens not demand that congress and law enforcement uphold the constitution, especially Article II and Article IV and due process of law.   The constitution  grants congress authority and power to declare war, not the president.  We mustn’t make excuses that just because one president or public servant violated constitutional law that it’s okay for the next one to do so. Besides, Gaddafi didn’t threaten America, but he was Obama’s long time friend and supporter, who referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and this begs the question how he suddenly became Obama’s enemy and ended up #2 on Obama’s “hit” list, and begging for his life – unarmed – assassinated under Obama’s orders. If someone steals a cookie, should the next kid be allowed to steal 2 cookies, too?  If that’s the case, it won’t be long before all the cookies and the cookie jar are stolen.  If someone kills a dog because he’s barking, not attacking, is the murder of the dog justifiable? 

Of course,  many people say, “But, they are all bad guys.  Who cares if they were murdered by assassination?”

Well, we have bad people in America too, including evil politicians in some cases.  We, too, experience bad people exposed in our government. Americans probably have some bad friends or relatives secretly hidden away in their closets.  How then shall we complain and justify  if a good and innocent American citizen enters a foreign nation and is murdered by assassination and we complain “evil” if we don’t follow the Rule of Law?

Of course, people will say, “But, those American citizens shouldn’t have gone into that country, they were stupid.”

Of course, people do stupid things, but assassinating people because they do some thing stupid or citizens who oppose political or religious agendas shouldn’t be a reason to compile a list of citizen names to be included or added onto  a “hit” list and unknown to the citizens to be targeted for murder by assassination or indefinite detention.  They already compile secret no fly lists and innocent Americans are denied the right to get on an airplane without recourse.  Think about that!  Isn’t that what Hitler did? We watch movies of communist and Third World nations run by tyrannical leaders who assassinate and indefinitely detain people in their countries without due process of law, but are we now facing the words of “compliance” and “non-compliance?”

Listen up!  Call, email, write, your congressional members and demand that they Repeal the unconstitutional NDAA law which not only targets Americans but circumvents and shreds Article IV,  of the U.S. Constitution, Due Process of Law and Article II and vetting policies as required by our government’s congressional members and Secretary of State and Speaker of the House.  It’s written into my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” the following –  “Without Due Process of law, there is nothing, – nothing but tyranny.” 

Wake up, all you sleepy heads!  Perhaps, it’s time to unite across the nation and March on D.C. peacefully and legally with the Sheriffs and Constitutional lawyers.  The U.S. Congress must stop the insanity of shredding the U.S. Constitution and targeting law-abiding Americans who pay their wages.  What is happening in America is insane!  In fact, there are published articles reporting that the President of France, Sarkozy, met with Obama, and allegedly stated that Sarkozy said that Obama is “insane.” I don’t know about that, but I do believe  most Americans believe he has an unconstitutional agenda. And, I don’t care what anyone thinks, creating a federal panel of unidentified czars and a secret “hit” list of law-abiding Americans by selective processes, which includes illegally spying on citizens, and using U.S. tax dollars is evil.  And even more evil is collecting names of Americans accused of being an enemy of the United States without being provided due process of law and placed on a “kill list” to be murdered is insane!  These unconstitutional laws deny U.S. Constitutional Law, Article II, due process of law, the Right-to-Life, unalienable God-given rights, and killing U.S. Citizens, not foreign enemies, but U.S. Citizens is no different from pre-meditated murder in my opinion.

Shame on the 111th and 112th U.S. Congress!  It’s shocking that elected public servants would approve indefinitely detaining or assassinating Americans, which is unconstitutional, immoral, unjust, unfair, and despicable.  It’s ridiculous that American leaders would declare American citizens “guilty” as accused which reflects the tyrannical laws of barbarians.  It’s stunning that America’s leaders would approve secret kill lists and assassinate American adults and minor kids accused of a crime without due process of law.  This raises the question if the government is reducing the population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens and making room for foreigners and refugees and Communist China and Russia to claim U.S. districts of soil?   These serious unconstitutional laws should be  worrisome to Americans, as it appears that Obama and Congress, the new immigrants, refugees, and illegals are opted out of the unconstitutional laws approved by Obama and Congress, as well as the punishments, being implemented against U.S. natural-born and legal generational naturalized citizens, i.e., NDAA Law, Patriot Act, secret Kill Lists, Obamacare and the Immigration Bill.

Rose says, “A successful civilized genocide through mandates that wipe out freedom, liberty, rights, sovereignty, the right-to-life, health care, as well as  silence a nation, a nation that has been slumbering for far too long, can be argued and perceived  by evil doers as an act of genius if one views evil as a good thing for the benefit of those who implement the evil acts; thus the evil doers rationalize their acts against humanity  as justifiable and implement evil deeds without conscience.” (C) 2011

Rose Colombo, long time legal and political activist, helping victims of legal abuse become survivors for 25 years.  For more information visit Rose’s website – http://www.colombochronicles.com

Listen to Live Radio – (all shows archived taped live on world wide online radio) – Colombo Chronicles Live at Blog Talk Radio Network:   http://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles

Read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s  Award Winner self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” or her latest Political Satire with humorous fictional characters and an Orwell 1984 type of  fictional story that parallels today’s political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” google www.amazon.com

Is Sharia Law Approved on US Soil And Prohibited by U.S. Constitutional Law an act of Treason against the United States?

Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!
Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!

Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015

How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld?  Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law.  Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows:  “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”

In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators.  The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent.  This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical  lawmakers  who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.”  Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.  Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights,  And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the  Law of Nations.

Sharia Law states it is a Law.  And, it is a foreign Law!  The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period.  It is called “Treason.”  Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East.  Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well.  The experts on Sharia state that  Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but  all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law.  It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.

Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated.  Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as  Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel.  The  U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from  church and state and provides freedom of religion in America.  In other words,  Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately.  Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the  Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization  with Sharia Law.  And, there lies a major difference.  The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is  the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.

In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow.  In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!

On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land.  There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization.  It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs.  Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.

Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food,  and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children.  But, in America, a majority of  U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches.  Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level?   Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization.  We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!

For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil.  Should we not ask  if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans?   If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the  U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization,  then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported.  Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and  discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely.  In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.

In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare.  It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty.  In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill?  If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped  from their titles by We The People?

It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and  to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason.  Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by.  The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!

Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only?  Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to  freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?

The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare.  This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves!  I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.

The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance.  It’s their way or the highway!  Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often.  The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.

Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion!  It states what it is – Sharia Law.  A LAW!  In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world.  One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization.  The radicals killed 3,000 Americans.  They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old  Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration.  They damaged the Pentagon.  They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke.  Many 911 witnesses  who came forward and testified about  what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind.  Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.

Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting  Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East.  They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims.  They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books.  The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny  freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but  exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.

Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.”  Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of  religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not  political “Laws,” but separate laws in America.  Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time.  Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization.  And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment.  The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food.  Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.

The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:

In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” one must understand their meaning and intent and purpose.  The Law defines “Religion” as follows:  “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”

Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation.  If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.

The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude  inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ?  And, why does a health care law include  2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts?  Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans.  It uses programs to reduce the population of future  U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies.  Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world.  The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.

Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses.  And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue  American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law.  What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States?  In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state.  People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.

Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution.  Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.

Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths?   Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag.  Again,  Sharia Law states  exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is  written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all  laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws.  Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal?   How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law!  Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?

Treason:  “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies.  Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary.   (Note:  Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer.  It’s unethical to ignore the laws of  plagiarism) 

If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated

Preview Image  Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HM5V4XK5J8EP4

Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding”  with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

Obama: First President in History To Increase U.S. Debt From $13T to $14Trillion in 7 Months!

King Obama says, "Eat Cake, America!"
King Obama says, “Eat Cake, America!” Rose Colombo, original (c) July 14, 2011. rev. 1/12/2014

Rose Colombo, 7/14/2011, rev. 1/12/2014

Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings?  Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government.  Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money?  After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement?  Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if,  Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any  different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?

Cut the Spending!  Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama!  He is the Print and Spend President.  Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010!  Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?

One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more!  And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans!  I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.

So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government  promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund.  If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money.  Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!

Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.

In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month.  The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care.  Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.

In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama!  No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth.  The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years.  The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China.  Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs.  It’s small businesses that create more jobs.  Instead,  Obama created more government  jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.

Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government?  Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes.  Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients.  Social security is money earned, not welfare.  Not only is Obama’s  threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living.  So, one must wonder if  Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?

Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate.  Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress.  In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund.  Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks,  was deposited into a “Trust” Account.

Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property?  How is diverting  the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens  considered ethical?  How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any  different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff.  Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.

Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable.  In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected.  Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.

So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?

In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America.   President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama.  Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA.  China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?

About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. .  On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters.  Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.

Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars.  Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk.  Obama fired off 221 tomahawks  – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people.  Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news.  He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.

Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt.  For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953.  Think about that!

How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president.  In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008.  Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.

But, Obama made history.  Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion!  He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.

Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder.  Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?

Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.

Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt?  China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.

The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work.  The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A.  Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer.  President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations.  He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A.  Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.

In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078.  Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years.  By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615.  In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion.  But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.

But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion!  Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there.  He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher.  So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?

2011:  U.S. Population = 311, 756,198  (2008 = 304,421,946)

2011:  U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291  (2008 = 108,228,953)

2011:  Official Unemployed = 14,055,369  (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)

2011:  Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)

2011:  State Local Employees = 15, 892,215

2011:  Federal Employees = 4,305,706

2011:  U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347

2011:  U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)

2011:  U.S. Families = 82,102,337  (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]

2011:  Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907  (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]

2011:  Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470

2011:  Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799

2011:  Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising

2011:  Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising

2011:  Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising

2011:  Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138

2011:  Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]

2011:  Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)

2011:  Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising

2011:  Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising  – a substantial decrease as of 2011)

2011:  Assets Per Citizen = $242,722  (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))

2011:  U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]

2011:  Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)

2011:  U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising  (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)

2011:  Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281

2011:  Total Debt Per Family = $669,109

2011:  Savings Per Family = $6,953  [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]

2011:  U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit:  $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *

2011:  National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503

2011:  National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747

2011:  Income Tax:  $946,651,562,999 and rising *

2011:  Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising

2011:  Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]

2011:  U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)

I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans.  Another example of waste is the  multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs.  But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!

2011:  U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second

Note:  The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!

Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!

(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt).    Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas.  You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com

Follow:  www.Facebook.com/RoseColombo  and  Twitter@Rose4Justice