Which Constitutional Authority is Obama; Congress Using to Exempt Themselves; Foreigners, Unions, Refugees,Illegals from Paying Up Front for ObamaCare?

Posted on by rose4justice
Take Back America!
Take Back America!

Rose Colombo – Rev. 4/11/2012, 3/30/2012 (C)

“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:  Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”

Wake up, America!  How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land?  It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a  restructured set of laws replacing  freedom and liberty, in my opinion.  ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive  mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!

In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must not go down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”

After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers.  A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a  baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period!  There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress. 

So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval?  Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself  – the authority to conceal his identity from the government  – and from the public.  It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval.  When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land?  This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval?  Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?

Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress  must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law?  This makes it very  difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing  Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge,  Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land  and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.

The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring  that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent  foreign and anti-American usurpers  from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President.  It is the birthright of every U.S.  Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected.  The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions,  and for the preservation of  Western Civilization so  future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.   

For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America.  He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions.  Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority. 

A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions.  Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education.  All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens. 

A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.” 

Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation?  It appears to me that the American people should be  very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially  Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law.  How is that?

Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections.  The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place.  In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.

Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit.  On the day of the inauguration about January 2009,  Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech.  Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV.  A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.

But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II,  the question remains if he intended  to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing   presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal?  Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself  the authority to conceal his identification records  from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented  in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals?  So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?  

Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder.  But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical?  After all,  Article II requires identification of  the public servant and proof  that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.      

On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws.  Thus, how is an  amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to  alter Article II to the 111th Congress and  seek Congressional approval?       

So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill,  to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record.  The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.    

 Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an  ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses.  After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor.  The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections.  And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual.   After the elections of 2008,  published records from the  Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record.  If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the  ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information. 

As I stated, this begs the question of  why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s  U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II  be considered  an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?   

These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth.  And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President.  Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.  

How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens.  ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved.  The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims,  SEIU union members,  possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals.  So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty,  then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?

In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.

ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation.  Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people  refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off  taxes of the hard working American citizens.  ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.

Therefore, I have three questions:  1)  How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and  U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or  lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress?  2)  How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress  or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records  for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people;  3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves  from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me  as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare?  (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices.  She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices.  Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com  – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –

Did Obama Usurp the Constitution and Congressional Power To Declare War on Libya with the blessings of the Democratic Congress?

Posted on by rose4justice
The Freedom Collection of U.S. Laws and Rights Must Be Preserved!
The Freedom Collection of U.S. Laws and Rights Must Be Preserved!
2-12-2013 010
Congress ignores “limited Powers” and tramples on the Constitution!

Rose Colombo, original (c)  3/22/2011, rev. 9/18/2013

Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution says Congress shall have the power to ……DECLARE WAR.,” not the President.  How then shall we decide if the Constitution is respected as the law of the land or even acknowledged by President Obama or congress?  Shall we assume that Congress is looking the other way and dismissing the Rule of Law as a mere charter of negative laws or liberties that no longer need to be followed, but ignored or changed?

Consequently, such negligent behaviors by congress begs the question:  Is congress holding themselves above the laws of the land by ignoring Obama’s one man decision to declare war without presenting his case to congress?  How then does Obama have the authority to spend billions of dollars on a war without the approval of congress?  It appears that congress is fearful of  calling for an investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, HHS, AP, and NSA, NDAA, Patriot Act, which are U.S. scandals and possibly crimes recurring from within the federal government without oversight which can lead to Obstruction of Justice.

Therefore, We The People must ask if  Obama is following the decisions set down by the U.N. versus the laws established by the constitution of the United States.  Obama stated several times that the US Constitution and US Congress are “meaningless?”  Perhaps, they were “meaningless” to him when he swore an oath to uphold, defend, and protect the U.S. Constitution, twice, with his hand on the “red” book.   The fact that Obama in my opinion violated the US Constitution and by-passed and ignored congress when he ordered the military to fire off 220 Tomahawk missiles at Libya and wasn’t held accountable for what appeared to most Americans as an “act of war” against a nation who never threatened to attack the United States of America.

And, let’s not forget that famous interview of Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State, who laughed hysterically when asked about the assassination of Gadaffi.  On national television, Gadaffi referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and congratulated a Kenyan for winning the election as President of the USA which shocked the entire Middle East and Kenya’s family, Parliament, and citizens.

Click the Link  posted as information for educational and entertainment purposes only:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb_N02-vh8M   – Hillary Clinton laughs during interview about Gadaffi assassination

Therefore, how is it that congress failed to call for an investigation into Obama’s failure to follow the Rule of Law since America is a Republic that operates by the Rule of Law?   Should we fear asking if America is still a Republic versus what many believe is a  Corporation owned by the Rothschild bankers.  Otherwise; how should We The People know how congress can justify ignoring Obama’s trampling on the laws of the land as if they have relinquished their powers and granted absolute power to a non-vetted admitted Kenyan in a free nation?

It would appear that the majority of Americans should be outraged that a U.S. President would fire missiles at a nation who didn’t attack the USA.  It is not important for all Americans to know where the loyalties of every U.S. President and the U.S. Congressional member lie during this volatile time in world history with knowledge that the wealthy elite are  determined to create a global world and seek to depopulate the world by 90% by the year 2050?  I guess firing off 220 Tomahawk Missiles would do the trick over time.

How is it that Americans are calling the congressional representatives with outrage and asking how much money Obama and Hillary Clinton spent on the attack against Libya that put their nation in disarray where blood was shed. It appears that Obama and congress are spending a lot less money and are a lot less concerned about fixing the economy or creating jobs versus their efforts that are destroying the U.S. economic status and reducing America’s credit rating for the first time in 240 years. It appears that they are more concerned about destroying jobs through outsourcing and using U.S. tax dollars against the will of the legal American citizens as they unconstitutionally spy on innocent Americans.  They are using U.S. tax dollars it appears to supply weapons and funding to train up anti-American and anti-Christian and anti-Jew organizations and rebels.

Remember, “The 1787 Adoption of the Constitution”  gave congress the power to raise and support armies,”  “Provide and maintain a Navy,” and “to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and Naval forces, as well as to “declare war” as well as granted the President of the United States the responsibility of being the military’s Commander In Chief.  The title, Commander-in-Chief is separate and apart from Obama declaring himself a one-man decision maker to declare war without congressional authority then have the congress diminish it as a non-war.

Furthermore, Americans should be asking if Obama violated the U.S. Constitution when he took it upon himself without the approval of Congress to sit as the Acting Chair of the U.N., while he is a sitting President of the United States? The U.S. Congress prohibits such behavior, but he appears to be able to do whatever he decides to do and it appears he has been granted special privileges.  Is Obama held above constitutional law and without accountability?

How then do these issues not raise eyebrows so that Americans can determine if the U.S. President as well as the U.S. Congress have misdirected their loyalty and are leaning towards protecting foreign anti-American nations and not so much legal Americans?  It appears the U.N. s overstepped their power when the federal government allowed the United Nations to trample upon America and the American people as the United Nations without any authority of the USA continues to overstep their bounds and demand Americans give up their weapons and children, or redistribute America’s wealth to them, depopulate future natural-born citizens, and give up U.S. Liberties to them.

During a senatorial investigation, former Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated to Chair, Jeff Sessions, that “we” – assuming Panetta and Obama, the Commander-in-Chief, would not seek permission for their agendas from Congress in the future, but would seek permission from international bodies, and may or may not inform Congress.  How is that not impeachable offenses?  In other words, their loyalty no longer lies with the Constitution and Congress, but with foreign international bodies, which should have caused outrage by Americans, but did not.

Obama and Hillary Clinton and their Democratic Regime appear to have gone rogue and appear to have been working with the Deep State and Shadow Governments which would include DHS-Fema and The Clinton Foundation and CFR, U.N. and NWO in my opinion.  They allowed the Muslim Brotherhood, to frequent the White House in secret meetings with Obama without the press present and tour the White House.  The stated and written strategic goal of the Muslim Brotherhood is to wipe out America, Europe, and Israel – all of Western Civilization.

How is it that President Obama determined that he has the power to declare war against Libya without presenting his case to Congress who are supposed to represent We The People?  The Congress is the only body established by the U.S. Constitution that can declare war with just cause. The Congress is responsible for U.S. tax dollars being spent wisely, yet, they wasted about $600,000 per Tomahawk Missile fired off at Libya for a total of 220.  Multiple $600,000.00 x 220 and that’s what the taxpayers lost and that doesn’t include the loss of life and property in Libya.  It appears that the White House and Congress spend the taxpayer’s money as if it’s theirs to do whatever they choose and ignore their responsibility to the American taxpayers.  This writer read that by 2016, the Tomahawk Missiles would be reduced down substantially because of Obama’s war on Libya which could mean he left America vulnerable.

The American people compensate the Presidents of the United States with jobs and taxpayer-funded wages, but within that election process lies a fiduciary duty and expectation of all public servants. The belief of a sworn oath by We The People includes the belief that the elected public servants will uphold morality, honesty, integrity, common sense, and loyalty to the USA and in exchange for their sworn oaths, they are required to uphold the Rule of Law as established within the U.S. Constitution. The  President is required to uphold his sworn oath as Commander-in-Chief and protect the safety and welfare of our U.S. military, not intentionally send the U.S. Navy Seals and Military into harm’s way to be slaughtered like sheep.

It appears to this writer that congress failed to protect the U.S. Military with all the Obama dictatorial orders that tied the hands of the military men and women which got many killed and dishonorably discharged or jailed!  Obama said, “America will never be at war with America” which meant in my opinion, he was protecting them, not us.  If America wasn’t at war with Islam then why were the troops sent to the Middle East to be injured or die on their soil?  This was the fault of the corrupted DNC and Democratic Socialist Liberal Congress and the Rinos as many became wealthy even though they are on taxpayer-funded wages.

The sworn oath doesn’t grant authority to exempt any US President or Congressional member from the law or grant them the authority to hold themselves above the law.The Congress and Obama decided they would hold themselves above the law it does appear. In fact,  lawmakers are to be held to a higher standard of the law. The sworn oath doesn’t grant authority to a U.S. President to rule by abuse of power and without objection by Congress.  The Constitution doesn’t grant a President of the USA to by-pass congress and the constitution by declaring the constitution and congress “meaningless” and state he will rule by Executive Order because he has a pen and a phone.  The Congress failed in their fiduciary duty to read laws and failed to nullify laws that were unconstitutional, illegal, and unlawful.

The truth is that every elected U.S. President and each member of congress has a fiduciary duty to read in-depth and study in-depth each law before they approve it and assure the American people each law is just, fair, equitable, economically sound, moral, and of good common sense.  They failed to do that between 1992-2016.

Therefore, how is it that Americans would not unite and protest any U.S. President or  Congressional members to say,  “Well, it doesn’t matter that Obama didn’t seek permission from Congress before ordering the military to fire off 220 Tomahawk missiles without approval against a leader and nation that never threatened the USA.  Obama’s rogue decisions eliminated Checks and Balances as he ruled by Executive Order only. Wars create homelessness, poverty, orphans, injured bodies, death and destruction, loss of jobs and income, and contaminated water and food, as well as disease.  Think about it!

The U.S. Constitution declares that Congress controls the purse strings, not the U.S. President, but Congress handed over the purse strings of the people’s tax dollars to president Obama in 2009. Americans are concerned about their welfare and safety since the majority of congressional members are rolling over like lap dogs and complicit to whatever president Obama decides. Are they afraid to speak out and if so then they should resign for they appear to care less that the economic status of the USA is sinking without recovery in sight.

Since the age of Obama and the Clinton’s taking office in 2009, it appears that the Democratic Congress doesn’t even bother to investigate or question the migration of unidentified foreigners in the tens of thousands into the USA from foreign terrorist nations?  How is it they were okay with Obama and Hillary, Ogden, and Holder trafficking and selling guns on foreign soil in Mexico to unidentified cartel members who murdered innocent people for two years between 2009 and 2011 on both sides of the borders after the President of Mexico met with Holder and Hillary Clinton complaining the guns were coming into Mexico from the USA?

In my opinion, the American Citizens should be wearing their red, white, and blue sandals and walking like the Egyptians.  Americans should ask how is it that a U.S. President is informed of a BP oil spill in the gulf of Mexico and he does absolutely nothing for two months to prevent its spill into the gulf that kills off the ocean life and fishing industry affecting the food industry in Mexico and the USA?  And, what happened to the billions paid to the Obama Regime for the oil leak by BP Oil?

Congress is compensated with taxpayer-funded wages and jobs in exchange for their promises and sworn oath that mandates they uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution of the USA and the welfare and safety of the American citizens, but the Democratic Socialist Liberal and Rino Congress have failed Americans greatly.  They cared less about vetting a U.S. President and cared less that he altered a Certificate of Live Birth and a U.S. Birth Certificate throughout the entire federal government which is absolute unprecedented and stunning in the greatest nation in the world.  The only explanation is that America is facing enemies from within not just from without.

You can find Rose at:  Facebook.com/rose.colombo.9 and twitter@Rose4Justice or LinkedIN – http://www.colombochronicles – http://www.rose4justice.com – http://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles

You’re invited to read free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s 2 books, the first is an award winner and self-help compilation of stories, information, and provocative questions, entitled , “Fight Back Legal abuse,” and her latest satire with humorous characters and a fictional Orwellian adventure story that leaves the readers with a provoking question at the end of Rose Colombo’s book entitled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” available at www.amazon.com

Follow:  www.facebook.com/RoseColombo and Twitter@Rose4Justice