written by Rose Colombo, original pub. (c) 5/11/2012, Rev. 6/17/2012
“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?”Ronald Reagan, (pub. Abortion and theConscience of the Nation)On or about February 18, 2009, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General stated, “There will be significant demographic changes this nation never faced…There will be no majority race in the United States in about 15 years…the coming diversity that could be such a powerful positive force will instead become a reason for stagnation and polarization. Although, there is a crying need for all of us to know the contributions of Black Americans, the Black history month is still a testament to the problems that has inflicted African-Americans throughout our stay in the country….Black history is critical to the knowledge of the Black history experiment.”
Although, Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, addressed a majority of Black Americans and students at a college, his comments raise the question if his words reflected distinct statements which could reveal a sinister and secret U.N. Agenda 21 with a stated goal of reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. A major part of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal and Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” focuses upon mandated abortions in America and Third World nations at 50% by the year 2015. Ironically, the news recently disclosed that USAG Holder’s wife owns an abortion clinic which raises the question if Obama’s mandated abortion laws approved by senators Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, in 2007, and the fact that Holder worked under the Clinton administration, is a Conflict of Interest?
Mandated abortions combined with other depopulation agendas such as ObamaCare, which includes taxpayer-funded government mandated abortions in America, also allows for infanticide. Is it possible that mandated Abortions could lead to government mandated abortions, not personal choice, which was implemented by Communist China for about 25 years? China’s leaders determined the female unborn babies would be aborted under their mandated law for depopulation purposes or pregnant women would be punished for non-compliance. Holder’s comments reflect Obama’s Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act aka New millennium Goals, which the non-vetted senator Obama implemented on or about December 7, 2007, and approved without the knowledge of the majority of U.S. citizens.
Should we not raise the question and ask if anyone would want their unborn baby or unborn grand baby to be used for food? Is it morally right to allow corporations to grind up unborn babies aka fetuses and use them for food additives into artificial sweeteners? Is that not to be considered as cannibalism? How many people approve of aborted unborn babies having their brains removed for experimentation as reported in the Orange County Register newspaper as a scandal by a major hospital? Millions of people believe that it’s moral to use unborn babies for stem cell research or for cloning. These statements are part of the reality relating to mandated abortions, which is downplayed by the Obama administration, Wall Street, and the media.
Obviously, mandated abortions increase taxes, and fund Planned Parenthood, and generate big-profits for abortionists, as well as some businesses within the food industry. On or about 2009, my blog informed U.S. citizens that Obama’s Global Poverty Act mandates worldwide abortions, which is in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21, a goal to depopulate the earth at 50%, by the year 2015. Senator Alan Keyes attempted to warn Americans that Obama’s agendas included radical programs. In fact, Senator Obama failed to disclose his obsession with mandated abortions during the elections which I refer to as “Obama’s War on Unborn Babies.” He presented himself as a traditional family man with pro-life agendas when interviewed by Pastor Rick, who later on, incorporated Chrislam into his church. The actions taken against unborn babies worldwide by the non-vetted U.S. Senator and President, Barack Hussein Obama, lead many to believe that he’s the most pro-abortion president to ever hit America.
Furthermore, Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare also includes tax funded mandated abortions against the will of the majority of U.S. citizens. Once again, Obama signed the Global Poverty Act passed on or about December 7, 2007, and he signed it into law as an Executive Order on or about January 2009. The Global Poverty Act is also known as The Millennium Global Goal and there wasn’t objection by the 111th or 112th U.S. Congress. The reason for the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal to reduce the population of the planet under the guise of reducing world poverty and saving the planet. Obama’s worldwide mandated abortion laws target not only the USA, but Third World nations, especially Africa. Obviously, if the federal government and the U.N. successfully reduce the population at 50% by 2015 or 90% by 2027, poverty would be nearly eliminated, but so would mankind. These programs won’t save the planet but destroy the planet. This leads me to ask how many citizens are asking their leaders and the supporters of Agenda 21 on what authority are they secretly implementing a program that includes depopulation and who made them God with the right to determine who lives and who dies.
Recently, in the year 2012, Obama shouted out in the media that women’s rights should include taxpayer-funded entitlements and their right to access Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood abortion clinics. He strongly promotes the right of young women to access free condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the majority of democrats and Rhinos support tax funded Planned Parenthood for-profit abortion clinics. Abortion is big business! It allows the federal government to substantially increase taxes for this big private corporation. Planned Parenthood is similar to a manufacturing business that operates an assembly line of commodities, but in this case, the assembly line’s commodities are pregnant women and unborn babies. Throughout history, mankind built businesses by hunting and killing animals, fishing, and harvesting trees or plants for big profits. But, Planned Parenthood is granted millions of tax dollars under ObamaCare to hunt for commodities known as pregnant women and unborn babies similar to a seamless assembly line for-profit. It is the unborn babies who are becoming the extinct species on the planet.
Remember, there’s more than one way to depopulate the planet, but mandated abortions and same-sex agendas are definitely included as well as radiation. It’s a fact that there’s more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black American communities than anywhere else in America. It appears that Agenda 21 and the Obama administration’s mandated worldwide abortion agendas target the poor, ethnicities, religions, and races, and includes mandating worldwide abortions in Third World nations, such as Africa and India. It appears that Obama’s Global Poverty Act is implemented as an Executive Order titled The Millennium Development Goal which appears to be in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21. The unconstitutional laws implemented recently in the USA appear to be linked into Agenda 21, i.e., ObamaCare, the
Also, under the guise of women’s rights, the Obama administration is focusing on young women, pregnant women, and unborn babies, through the promotion of entitlements such as mandated abortions, and promoting contraception. The Obama regime targeted the Catholic Church and Catholic hospitals, who oppose abortion and the distribution of contraceptives and the morning after pill. The Catholic Church filed a lawsuit against the federal government’s mandated abortions and distribution of contraceptives. Mandated Abortions offends the moral compass of the Catholic religion. Shall we not ask if the U.N.’s Agenda 21 is a program that intends to use U.S. leaders to circumvent the Constitution and the U.S. Congress?
It would appear that such an agenda is implemented to control the masses with the intent of creating a one world government. It’s not possible to create a one world government if U.S. laws aren’t shredded or the borders aren’t opened up for the migration of foreigners. How then is such an agenda not sending up red flags and shocking the minds of every U.S. citizen, as well as citizens around the world, especially citizens living in Third World Nations who are on the radar for depopulation? Furthermore, Communist China mandated the death by abortion of 400,000,000 unborn baby girls for more than two decades. Government mandated abortions is a genocide. Mandated abortions reduces the population of unborn babies who are the future citizens. The U.N. and the U.S. didn’t oppose the mandated abortions in China. In fact, if any pregnant woman attempted to conceal the birth of a baby girl, they were punished. And, the Chinese government’s mandated health care programs required the monitoring of young girl’s menstrual cycles. Hillary Clinton and Diane Feinstein support the U.N.’s Rights of the Child which denies U.S. parents the right to exercise parental rights. This means the all family law matters in the U.S. could be rendered under a U.N. flag versus a U.S. flag as the new one world court.
Once again, the U.N. has been working hand in hand with past and current U.S. Presidents and supporting Congressional members, as well as international leaders who approve of redistributing America’s wealth as well as reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. They are playing God and their goals include mandated abortions, infanticide and partial birth abortions. They believe that the federal government should replace the parents.
Remember, the key supporters of Obama’s worldwide mandated laws were senators Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Clinton, and Kerry and a majority of representatives. After the Global Poverty Act was signed into law, senator Obama immediately filed the application to compete in the presidential race of 2008 even though he previously stated that he was too “inexperienced” to be a U.S. President. Consequently, the U.N.’s Agenda 21is known as a sustainable rural development program using U.S. tax dollars for the redistribution of America’s wealth with the alleged goal of re-developing Third World nations by wealthy banksters. The question should be pondered if the globalists are successful at depopulating the targeted nations how then shall mankind live, but only as slaves? Thus, if there are traitors in the nation who are working to polarize and destroy America by comforting and abetting the enemy and supplying them with money and military defenses how then shall the American people stop this evil machine?
Also, there are rumors that the government might install vending machines into every school stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Well, Obama promised change and change has come to America under the guise of women’s rights, the war on terrorism, and health care. The truth is that the liberal agenda began back in the 1970s, when the feminists, who were mostly same-sex women, encouraged women not to have more than two kids. The feminists influenced young married women that motherhood was a thankless job as well as being a housewife. The feminists managed to make young married women feel guilty about being a wife and mother and caused them to feel that they should be out working. They encouraged young wives and mothers to get out of the house – get divorced – go out and work – under the guise of equal rights. President Reagan, warned women that equal rights for women would result in a new struggle for women, especially single mothers, in the future. He also warned against Pro-Choice laws. In fact, Americans criticize China for passing a law that says they can’t have more than one child, but we aren’t far behind telling American women not to have more than two kids and that they should abort their babies instead of putting the babies up for adoption.
Americans complain there’s fewer U.S. Natural Born Citizens on U.S. soil. That’s true. There are fewer births of U.S. natural Born citizens today, because foreigners don’t take contraceptives. Most foreigners aren’t aborting millions of unborn babies. They intend to have large families. America has aborted about 70,000,000 plus babies since Roe v. Wade was approved and we disgusted by Hitler? We’re stabbing babies sin the head and ripping apart their body parts and selling them for profit and experiments, but we send people to jail for harming an animal, and yes, protect animals, but what about human beings? We are killing our future U.S. Natural Born Citizens who are needed to preserve the United States of America for only the natural born citizens of a civilization can preserve their civilization, traditions, laws, culture, and sovereignty.
Furthermore, scientists and researchers around the world willingly use the fetuses for experiments, stem cell research, or cloning. They are alleged to be selling body parts, organs, and human tissue which is against the law. Great Britain was the first country to receive licensing for cloning. It’s imperative that citizens of the world and Western civilization question if mandated abortions is a sinister program that is being carried out by the secret globalists under the guise of women’s rights. They appear to seek world power and control through unprecedented mandates that go against God, the Bible, and morality. These mandates include excessive regulations, and cruel and unusual taxation and punishments with the intent of reaching their globalist goal with their hope for change and transformation of the USA and the world. Is freedom and liberty and God-given unalienable rights an illusion, or is a One World Order an illusion. The goal of the globalist appears to be a one world superior race – slave vs. master – a one world leader – and a collective global utopia? (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). Scroll Down to the bottom of the page to Like, Share, & Comment
Follow Facebook/Rose Colombo or
Facebook/The Justice Club – Twitter Twitter@Rose4Justice
Books: Irwin Award Winner and 5 Star Review: Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help featured around the world -www.amazon.com
Books: Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals- 5 Star Political Satire – http://www.amazon.com
Radio: The Justice Club – MWF -9am-10:30am pst and 12-1:30pm est-usa -google Freedomizer Radio at blogtalkradio -listen worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-34704 – Follow – Share – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Public Speaker csontact Rose4Jusice@verizon.net – Rose has been a guest speaker at the L.A. Press Club Speakers Bureau, Granada Forum, Chambers of Commerce, DOJ Criminal Planning; California Senate, community groups, and the Pro-Justice Summit
Other: Social Media and You Tube
Rose Colombo, award-winning author, Legal Advocate, Activist, and Coach, created the question that rang out across the nation in 2009, when she posed the question, “How is the Obamacare “Mandate” Constitutional or legal? She sent the question to every congressional member in her worldwide Blog, “Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal” and her question was read with her name on the congressional floor and debated in the Supreme Court. (pub (c). 4/6/2012, rev 3/29/2012, rev 4/27/2013, 6/21/2013), rev. 10/8/2013
The End Times are Upon the World! That was the cry of many, but the Mayans may not have been stating that December 12, 2012 was the end of the world, but signaling that it’s the beginning of the end under the Obama regime working within the federal government’s intent to “fundamentally transform ” America taking American to a dangerous crossroad leaving Americans vulnerable to unconstitutional laws that could lead to the death of millions of Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Citizen!
The Obama regime appears to be preparing to implement police states and approving unconstitutional and immoral laws upon the American people. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, asked the question if the federal government’s next mandate is to order that all Americans buy Broccoli, a consumer product or elect a dog for U.S. President if the vetting laws and Identification laws aren’t required!
The US Supreme Court Justices debated the question of the “mandate” which I created and sent to every Congressman, blogged worldwide, and ended up read on the congressional floor with my name. The 112th Congress was negligent and appeared derelict in their duty which requires that they read and study each law in-depth, but they approved 2700 pages of unread laws which shocked the nation and rubber stamped it in favor of Obama when they took bribes for votes!
The duties of a U.S. President are limited, yet this non-vetted and unidentified president has been granted absolute powers to declare the Congress and the Constitution basically as meaningless and stated that he could do whatever he wants and no one can stop him because he has a phone and a pen and he’s the Commander-in-Chief, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief of the American people; in fact, it is the American people who are his Commander-in-Chief and who must take back the pen and the phone before more Americans die on the battlefield, not just the foreign battlefield, but the domestic battlefield on U.S. soil as declared by Obama and Congress.
In an unprecedented announcement, Speaker Pelosi announced that Congress approved the unread mandates, regulations, taxes, and punishments included in Obamacare without performing their duty and studying each law, but she declared Americans would like it after it’s approved so they can find out what’s in it sort of like a Jack in the Box affect, only Americans found out that it was more like “Chuckie” jumping out and attacking and shredding the U.S. Constitution with his knife.
Today, Obama and Congress shamelessly exempt themselves without any constitutional authority from signing up, paying up, and from liability or punishment for passing the unread Obamacare and approving it with a rubber stamp! They discriminate against Americans who aren’t in their inner circle as well as Muslims, Refugees from the Middle East, Donors, Bundlers, SEIU and others.
After the Obamacare red carpet was stained with a series of serious glitches and billions are being spent to try to fix something that can’t be fixed, the truth is that Americans are losing their existing health care coverage and suffering because they can’t access their doctors or treatments or else they’re treatments and medications are unaffordable or the deductibles and premiums are unaffordable, so now there is equality! Not only do illegals, and the Muslims and all those who didn’t have health care prior to Obamacare was implement, it’s a fact that Americans will also be without health care as more hospitals close their doors and retreat to becoming an Urgent Care facility. And, that’s not to mention the millions of jobs that will be lost because of Obamacare! Obamacare is actually making more Americans very sick!
Wake Up, Americans! Are the majority of Americans aware that former impeached President Bill Clinton ordered a study on “Human Capital?” Recently, Bill Clinton was in the news alluding that Americans will like Communism. Hillary Clinton made international news during the congressional hearings when she was questioned about her friend, who was the U.S. Ambassador, and 3 murdered military men killed by terrorist attacks at Benghazi and she angrily replied, “What difference does it make?” Also, President Obama hit the news when asked about murdered American soldiers and the US Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and he casually remarked that they were mere “bumps in the road.”
Human Capital is the study of individuals and allows the federal government to determine the value or lack of value of each human being based upon gender, age, health, possibly religion, politics, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, and IQ or talents versus the lack of worth to the federal government and the cost to the government, i.e., an individuals cost for health care treatments, food, housing, and education. This is a Orwellian 1984 agenda. It represents a Nazi type of agenda with the intent of creating collectivism as well as a means of reducing the population and creating a Master Slave mentality. This is also the dream of creating the Master Race. Yet, the American people have been cheering on the Obama’s and the Clinton’s and support and defend their dream of a New World Order demanding every individual march to the drum beat and comply or else be punished.
Furthermore, past and current congressional members failed to perform their fiduciary duty as required by the 14th Amendment and their sworn oaths and job duties that require each member to read and study each law in-depth! They not only failed to study each law in-depth and assure the American people that each law, mandate, regulation, punishment, tax, and penalty are written in accordance with the US Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans and reflect the best interest of the American people. They failed or refused to read 2700 pages of laws, which in my opinion, appear to be a serious dereliction of duty. But, which public servant working in the taxpayer-funded federal government cares about the US Constitution? After all, it is the non-vetted President Obama who stated more than once that the U.S. Constitution is flawed and that it is “meaningless?” He stated, “The Constitution is a mere charter of negative [liberties] that need to be changed.”
Hypocrites! Too many members of the White House and Congress are hypocrites and they appear to be lawmakers who have turned into law breakers as they hold themselves above the laws which they mandate for the American people and exempt themselves from the laws. Laws are written for criminals as law-abiding citizens don’t violate the laws. Criminals exempt themselves from the law and hold themselves above the law, but law-abiding citizens follow the Rule of Law and public servants swear to uphold U.S. Constitutional law.
Should the American people not ask which constitutional authority is the White House and Congress applying that grants these public servants the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they mandate as constitutional law on U.S. soil, even though they admit that the laws are unread and possibly unconstitutional and illegal? After all, if they weren’t read, how would they know what’s in them when they rubber stamped them “approved.” Perhaps, it would have been wiser to rubber stamp Obamacare, “D.O.A.,” dead on arrival.
Consequently, it’s amazing to me that the American people haven’t bothered to ask how unread and unconstitutional laws can be legal on U.S. soil or how people can be punished on U.S. soil for failing to comply with unread or unconstitutional laws? The fact that they are unread should render them unconstitutional on their face! This problem should raise the question under which constitutional law is Obama and Congress applying that provides them the authority to write discriminatory constitutional laws and grants them the authority to exempt people who they favor or where there are huge conflicts of interest wuch as bundlers, donors, and supporters?
If Obamacare is such a great improvement to the healthcare industry then why would the Obama’s and Sebelius, Biden, and congressional members want to exempt themselves from complying with Obamacare? This problem begs the question if they realize that Page 107 of Obamacare includes making Americans slaves of the Muslim immigrants and refugees living in the USA by referring to Americans on this page as Dhimmis? If you don’t know what a Dhimmi is then you should read up because from my research it means “slave.” In other words, the American people must comply and pay up for their housing, food, and health care. Could this be one of the key reasons why Obama is so adamant about forcing Obamacare upon the American people?
Another key reason for Obamacare appears to be depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and he approved of Infanticide of U.S. Natural Born Citizens while he was a senator which means babies that are born after abortion are left to die. In fact, senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act with the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, and others, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires that Americans pick up the tab to kill these babies with abortion scissors in the USA and around the world! This flies against the moral majority and Christians and Catholics who are being wiped out by terrorists around the world! This Global Poverty Act that Obama signed as an Executive Order about January 2009 diminished the constitutional Right-to-Life and it reflects a depopulation program similar to that of the U.N. Agenda 21.
Obamacare or the ACA or [un]Affordable Care Act is not so affordable. In fact, most people can’t afford to sign up or comply because he’s increased their Health Care Premiums by 40% to 100% depending upon the plan. It’s been reported in the news that about three million Americans are not without health care insurance because of Obamacare as their insurance companies cancelled their plans. In fact, Obamacare robs from Peter to pay Paul. Peter is Medicare and is being robbed by Obama to pay for Obamacare which diminished the services for seniors, veterans, disabled, and the very sick who rely on Medicare.
If Obamacare is such an outstanding and legal benefit being implemented as a national takeover of the healthcare industry by the federal government then why must the federal government mandate excessive taxation, excessive penalties, excessive punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits those excesses? If Obamacare is so wonderful then why are doctors retiring early and expressing their disdain for Obamacare? And, why are businesses closing down and laying off American employees or reducing their work hours which reduces productivity because of Obamacare? This will increase the cost of consumer products to Americans because businesses will be forced to pay higher premiums for their part-time employees including illegal citizens!
Justice Scalia questioned if Obama, who implemented the umbrella law known as ObamaCare, could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off base at all! After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat! And Mayor Bloomberg is pushing what and how much Americans can drink. And, Monsinto, oops, I mean Monsanto, is pushing GMO’s on the world and fighting against labeling their products. Michelle Obama is promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks. The Redistribution program which includes the snack and spy program is described in my latest political satire on how Obamacare and Redistribution of wealth could devastate a free Judeo-Christian Nation that leaves the reader with thought-provoking messages on these agendas and it’s titled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs,Red Necks and Radicals” available at amazon.com
Therefore, Obama is selling snake oil to the American people. His health care is more about death care because his program includes death panels, euthanasia, enslavement to foreigners and donors, and depopulation through same-sex agendas and mandated abortions. His committee of 15 will determine who lives and who dies based upon their evaluation of each individual as human capital who will be no more than a commodity of value or little value to the federal government. As I stated, if Obamacare is such a wonderful health care program then Obama and Biden, Sebelius, senators Reid, Pelosi, and the entire Congress should be the first to sign up, and comply with their own laws, otherwise they are law breakers and holding themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, but are failing to follow the Rule of Law which they swore to do.
How then are the American people not rising up and demanding that Congress Repeal and stop the funding before the tsunami hits that is coming upon U.S. citizens in January 2014? How is it that Obama, Biden, and Congress are determined to destroy the greatest health care industry in the world and force Americans into the worst HMO system that they could ever imagine? Obama and his regime are forcing Americans to pay up front against their will for mandated abortions and death panels or else be punished? Isn’t that like paying for your own demise and the demise of your family, friends, unborn babies, and fellow Americans and helping make the U.S. Natural Born Citizen extinct? How is it that Americans can’t see this as a silent genocide without war or guns on what Obama and congress now refer to as a battlefield? Does it not appear that the federal government is at war with America and Americans?
Should the American citizens not ask why do we need a committee of 15 approved by Obama to determine if they will send Americans to early end of life counseling and pull the plug on grandma or the very sick or veterans? Is this program intended to save money for the federal government so foreign immigrants and illegals and Refugees can move into the USA and access food, housing, and Obamacare without paying up, because it will be paid on the backs of US taxpayers and create a nation of federal government works vs. a nation of citizens on entitlement programs dependent upon the federal government to take care of them since their focus has been on destroying jobs, not creating jobs!
Obviously, Americans will be mere chattel used as commodities and as “human capital” while Obama golf’s at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day to the U.S. taxpayers. The Obama Muslim Brotherhood and non-vetted czars and Congress will allow this committee of 15 to determine who will be euthanized, denied or rationed health care services based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government. Unless the law has been amended, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply and pay up front for Obamacare could spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty, so many will never get a monopoly card to get out of jail.
In fact, the federal government grants to themselves the right to raid and confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the federal government under Obamacare. Obama has enacted a NSA Massive Surveillance Program recently exposed by Whistleblower named Edward Snowden who most believe to be a U.S. hero. It’s my opinion that the massive set of Obamacare laws replaces the Constitution of the United States and denies Freedom, Liberty, and Rights.
Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare. So, why did I write the first blog in 2009 warning the nation and Congress – “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:
1. How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legallyand constitutionally moved forward to hear the unread 2700 pages without review, debate or congressional study prior to hitting the U.S. Supreme Court. Shockingly, the majority of Supreme Court Justices approved the unconstitutional ObamaCare and Justice Robert nailed the last nail into the coffin that would end the best health care system in the world.
Consequently, Justice Elena Kagan refused to Recuse herself from the Obamacare case even though there were documented reports related to her long time association with student Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama. After Harvard received a $20M donation from the Saudi Prince and Obama was named President of the Harvard Law Review, it’s reported that Kagan worked on a project to help create an Islamic Studies program at Harvard. Thereafter, it’s reported that Senator Obama appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and she worked on Obamacare and favored it and represented him in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thereafter, he appointed her as a U.S. Justice right before the Obamacare case was to be decided.
upreme Court while Solicitor General according to the records reported in the news. As a result, the majority of Americans requested that Justice Kagan remove herself from voting on Obamacare, but she refused and Justice Roberts refused to do so. There are many reports of the long time favorable association Kagan and Obama since he attended Harvard when she was Dean Kagan. In fact, the news posted a video that documented a special event when Dean Kagan held a special even for Senator Obama and she stated he was the most brilliant student to ever attend Harvard.
After Obama was elected as a non-vetted U.S. President, he appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him in an eligibility case while she was Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. which is considered unethical according to the Code of Ethics. Also, after Obama took office as an non-vetted U.S. President, Kagan worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General. Obama then nominated Kagan for the position of U.S. Justice. And, the Conflict of Interest is that these behaviors give the appearance of grave Conflicts of Interest as she was elevated thereafter to that of U.S. Justice right before Obamacare was to be voted upon. This behavior is similar to being a guest in Las Vegas by the CEO and Pit Boss of a luxurious casino. You put your money on the table, but the dice are stacked against you without your knowledge and you lose the shirt on your back. These issues casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court. It will take generations if at all possible to restore trust in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices.
2. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to “avoid” Article II of the U.S. Constitution? The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing . It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly non-vetted president who admits that his father is foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Great Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen cannot have a foreign born parent even if born on U.S. soil for that makes him a “naturalized citizen,” but not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.”
The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question and has been the resource used by congress for 237 years.
3. Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,700 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved? After all, it is the fiduciary duty required by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and their duty to the American people that the U.S. Congress read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before the laws are debated in the Supreme Court.
4. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?
5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?
6. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy? How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress to approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign? How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?
7. Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya. So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?
8. Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law, but then how is it that they are writing laws which are on federal land, not located on the soil of the USA? Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?
9. Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earningsafter taxes –earnings are private property– so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings aka private property to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections which the government may or may not provide with complete immunity?
Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty. Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?” In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care. Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution, known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.
So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front money scheme for Obamacare be paid up-front into the government’s fund without accountability as they know nothing, see nothing, and hear nothing when they are caught at wrong doing, and stand on the 5th and refuse to answer the questions as to what happened to the money?
How does it not border on extortion when law-abiding Americans have an imaginary gun placed to their heads by government thugs telling them to pay-up-front with their own earnings, even if they don’t want the consumer product, because consumer products are paid with private property aka personal earnings then taxes are paid. Why are Americans being forced under the threat of fear or punishment to pay up for a consumer product they don’t want and may never receive as the government retains the right to deny or ration said services?
Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Social Security with the promise of saving the taxpayers money for retirement by forced taxation from personal earnings? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than collecting taxes for Medicare and after they divert the money from Medicare, they tell the taxpayers, too bad, we’re denying or cutting services to seniors? Could Obamacare become the a bigger Ponzi scheme than the Redistribution of Wealth? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Patient Dumping at University Hospital for big profits and bonuses by the staff? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than the fraud of the Housing Crisis implemented by Congress and Bankers? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than promising 350,000 infrastructure jobs in exchange for billions of dollars? Could Obamacare be a bigger Ponzi scheme than Solyndra whose bundler owner took the taxpayers money then gave himself and partner big bonuses and wages and bankrupted? Could Obamacare be the biggest Ponzi Scheme to make and create big taxes for depopulation programs and to create big profits for politicians, banksters, and Wall Street?
Is This THE KEY TO ENSLAVE US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS? Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into aprivate enterprise as a for-profit health care industryas well as acting as the federal government with the intent to control a private corporation known as the national health care industry is unconstitutional. So where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to take over private corporations on US soil since they operate on federal soil with “limited powers and are now acting as a dual government and free enterprise running private corporations for-profit and excessive taxes with punishment?
The the truth is that only public servants, military, and foreign immigrants, swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, but the U.S. Natural Born Citizens born to two legal American parents on U.S. soil, who are the only persons eligible to be a U.S. President aren’t required to swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution unless those person enter public service or the military or they are foreign immigrants granted US Naturalized citizenship. U.S. Natural Born Citizens Pledge Allegiance to the U.S. Flag, but that doesn’t protect them under U.S. Constitutional laws if they haven’t sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps, that’s the reason some judges state to U.S. Natural Born Citiznes in court that they have no constitutional rights.
Therefore, how is it that U.S. Natural Born Citizens aren’t swearing an oath by the age of 7 to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? So, if US Natural Born Citizens aren’t sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but public servants, military, and foreign immigrants do swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, then how does that not leave the door open on U.S. soil for public servants to enslave and indefinitely detain U.S. Natural Born Citizens if they aren’t sworn to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution which establishes their guaranteed liberty, freedom and rights? If that’s not true then why are foreign immigrants required to swear an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in order to be guaranteed constitutional protections? Also, how can a federal entity operating on federal land outside of the USA, District of Columbia, which isn’t part of the United States of America, be mandating laws for the separate states in the USA since the federal government is a separate federal entity working on federal soil, granted “limited powers” known as the District of Columbia, which isn’t U.S. soil? Shouldn’t the District of Columbia become a State of the USA so they can operate as part of the USA, so now you know why the Framers granted them “Limited Powers.” Otherwise, a foreign entity known as the federal government working on federal land would stomp their Big Foot on individuals and individual state laws. Today, the federal government has trampled on “limited powers” and are lawless and have gone dictatorial rogue?
Furthermore, Obamacare will lead to collectivism. These laws will force citizens out of the suburbs into the cities where fewer people can be more easily controlled. These laws will reduce the income of the Middle Class U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and no doubt will devastate the quality of life and the quality of the current health care industry. So, should we not ask what is the difference between the mafia, who force people to hand over money against their will and who comply under fear and threat of losing their homes or businesses or be punished? Today, we have a non-vetted president who appears to be punish Americans and represented himself as a poor black kid with a white mother who is golfing at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day for rent and taking $100,000,000 vacations at taxpayer’s expense while denying services and jobs to Americans who pay his wages and pay up for his luxurious lifestyle! Americans are hurting for jobs and struggling to buy gas and food as costs increase, but reckless spending is ok? Has the US Congress and the American people lost their minds and all common sense and logic? It appears that We The People have forgotten that they are the government.
How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws of “limited powers?” If the federal government is taking over and running a private corporation, the health care industry, then shouldn’t the government be providing disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase with their personal earnings against their objections?
The Boards of Consumer Affairs require consumer disclosures, laws, policies, requirements, and regulations of consumer products sold to consumers prior to selling or providing consumer products so is the federal government above those laws, as well? Is the federal government operating as a national health care industry and obtaining business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses or Medical Malpractice Insurance? After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people! As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war or by guns, which is serious. Americans need to demand disclosure on their rights under Obamacare if they experience rationing or being denied services or prescriptions and their rights relating to any damages caused by such actions as well as the right to file lawsuits.
And, even more remarkableis the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, which Obamacare doesn’t favor be ordered to pay up front for services or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.
In fact, Eric Holder, stated, “Americans will be polarized. The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years. There will be no majority race in America.” Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Natural Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV, Due Process of Law, and replacing it with the NDAA Law? In my latest political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,the dinosaurs are confronted with mandated abortions as the elders fight back knowing that mandated abortions will reduce their population. This keepsake exposes the dangers of Obamacare and Redistribution of America’s wealth to anti-American nations.
In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, Obamacare is discriminatory, unconstitutional, unread, and possibly illegal. Obamacare borders on laws mandated in tyrannical Third World nations by dictators who hold themselves above the law as they punish their citizens or cause their demise. Is there any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug on the street, who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else?’ Or a thug who says, “Hand over your money or else?” What if a car dealer told you, “You’re required to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all.” What’s the difference? (Note: This article may be shared but please do not remove content without giving credit to the writer and please don’t plagiarize the content, much appreciated.
LIKE – COMMENT – REBOG – FOLLOW – buttons on top and bottom and welcome
Follow Rose or Rose4Justice
Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse or Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals, at amazon.com
You Tube – Rose4Justice or Rose Colombo
Radio : The Justice Club – google Freedomizer Radio – MWF 11am-12p (pdt) – 2-3p (est-usa) – Call or listen & speak out at (347) 324-3704
Radio: Constitutionally Speaking – Fridays, 4:30-6p (pdt) and 7:30p-9p (est-usa) – google Freedomizer Radio or listen online or ipods or Call & listen & speak out (347) 324-3704
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice Pinterest Google+ Tumbler DIGG
Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational and entertainment purposes only. <a
by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder
Did Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?
In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about March 2012. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly. Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?
Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants; but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future. Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?
Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law. For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter? The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive. So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty? Also, the attacks on Libya, in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.
Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies? Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority? Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?
Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution. He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States
Rep. Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree. Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal basis.” He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”
Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act. He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.
Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.” He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you. If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.
Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.” Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis. Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here. We want to build an international support.
Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat. Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution. Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by Panetta’s statements.
Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.
So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress? Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution. It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.
In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?
The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitutionand Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175). It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it. They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere. For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion. I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another. I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.” In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.
According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.
Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers? How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends. How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place? At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.
Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation. How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution? For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder, without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price. If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?
Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or 2 men the right to knight themselves with absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen? Obama called the attack on Libya, a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?
In conclusion, if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country. If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern, it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.
Furthermore, if the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion? America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?
How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA? By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial? Even a guilty person should be given a trial! In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now. The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds. The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only. By the way, how is that even legal in America? It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws. Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages! Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Click the like button and leave a comment, please. You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit Disclaimer: Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
written by Rose Colombo – original (c) pub. 12/28/2011, rev. 12/13/2013
Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution. It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.
Recently on CNN, the Intel Chairs, including Senator Feinstein, stated that America is less safe today than we were before 2009 or after 911. How is it that America is vulnerable to attack in 2013 when they had the opportunity to refuse to pay Iran $7B of US taxpayer money every year with knowledge that they are building possible nuclear weapons and that their former leader, Ahmadinejad and many other Muslim Brotherhood members or groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would wipe Western Civilization – America and Israel – off the face of the map?
The most alarming statement ever made during my life time, which should have rocked the nation, came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein, who said congress and the non-vetted President Obama implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows: “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.
How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government to be targeted anywhere around the world if “accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all “due process of law?” Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, “The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.” Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing words included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senators Graham and John McCain stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution?
Remember, Judge Napolitano stated, NDAA “shreds” the U.S. Constitution even though Obama and Congress swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen, not charge a citizen. Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military? So, has the 111th and 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without “due process of law,” there is no justice! There is only the possibility for tyranny and death or enslavement. The political satire recently released on amazon.com, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, alerts mankind to the dangers of Obamacare and the Redistribution of America’s wealth with fictional characters that parallel today’s Orwellian state of affairs.
Hear ye! Hear ye! All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story, along the lines of War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members – elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars, who voters and taxpayers believed as having the highest level of integrity and loyalty to the United States of America. America is a Republic and has been established as a Republic implemented by the Rule of Law, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, so let’s pray that the NDAA Law ends up to be no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible lack of communication, right? Unfortunately, it is real! I have posted videos online with a special guest and Patriot, Anthony J. Hilder,, who warned Americans back in the late 1990s, that there were people, who intended to imprison more Americans, especially Blacks, eventually use them for racial tension then as slaves in the prisons, but then again – it appears that any American can be a potential target today, since the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, Kill List using drones or whatever, and the foreign invasion of a majority of radical males, as well as the implementation of Obamacare that denies health care in most cases and mandates taxpayer funded abortions, death panels, mandated vaccines, micro-chips, and basically, death to Americans. And there is the Executive Order signed by President Bush in 2005 and Obama under his reign that wipes out the Constitution, Sovereignty, USA, and allows for the indefinite detention of all Americans should a President call out Civil Unrest or a Pandemic and Martial Law on U.S. soil which is totally unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, and outside of their job duties for which they are elected and taxpayer funded. It’s calle treason.
The NDAA law includes sections 1031 and 1032 and brings back memories of Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America” and failed to address himself as the President of the United States of America. Why would he do that? It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’ seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles. Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor by wiping out the Middle Class and creating a nation of the wealthy citizens and a nation of poor citizens. And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the “homeland” to be nothing more than a “battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as “enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” only and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law.” Or should we ask if the Obama regime are granting to themselves the authority to kidnap Americans on domestic or foreign soil without due process of law and without public scrutiny so that the persons kidnapped under the NDAA law would have no contact with the outside world? The usurping of the 4th Amendment, due process of law, by writing a new law to unconstitutionally by-pass due process of law, eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.
The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads: “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens. It does.”
Oh, no, it can’t can’t be possible for U.S. Congressional members to deny due process of law knowing it’s unconstitutional, right? We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right? Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and either laid down their lives or would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments, for which our U.S. laws are rooted, and the word of God expressed in the Bible, as well as the definition of our laws defined in the book, the “Law of Nations.”
Yes, it is true! Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA as stated by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.) on national television. The NDAA’s, sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter – did not include Americans – but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law. It’s alleged to have been passed without the congressional members knowing the law included Americans, but pressured by the non-vetted President Obama to include Americans, a very disturbing thought, indeed. Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein, McCain, Levin, and Graham as well as the mostly democratic congressional representatives, as well as Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 – and did not strike those unconstitutional sections – from the law titled NDAA-S.1867. The NDAA law, shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment, based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.”
Now is the time to demand to answers as to how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every citizen, legal or illegal, on U.S. soil as some people allege our government is under some sort of threat and are working allegedly under some sort of fear written by alternative writers. So, hasn’t the president and the Congress violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? How is it that Senator Graham and Senator McCain as ell as other representatives declaring that the “world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war? Thus, they would have to declare war against the country they swore to protect! Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that “people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?” Also, how is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” – an ugly law titled, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of Sections 1031 and 1032). This should be worrisome to Americans considering the majority of Americans want a new “vetted” president, as they are watching the race card being played out, knowing that such actions could cause civil unrest.
Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”
As I state in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” that “without “Due Process of Law, Article, IV, there is nothing! There is nothing but tyranny!” Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people who are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law. It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”
Americans must write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, refuse to reveal the “charges.” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial,” and deny American citizens access to a civilian court guaranteed to U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law, while providing due process of law to captured Middle East foreign radicals of 911 and other attempted plots against America.
Again, Senator Feinstein stated that sections 1031 and 1032 are included targeting Americans for indefinite detention saying, “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard. So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief? But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power.
Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a U.S. soldier of a crime. Although, there are journalists stating that this law, Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today. In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases. Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, “So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.” He said, “Yes, they are still in effect.”
Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, “Don’t be
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.”
So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?” Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?
Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?” One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world. The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare. During WWII, the Nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being “extremists.” So, sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.
In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’ including the homeland.” How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” as Sections 1031 and 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government, who can be detained indefinitely, as “enemy combatants” and denied “due process of law?” It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from the NDAA Law and Sections 1031 and 1032 which they have dished out for the American people. After all, they shoved the unread Obamacare down the throats of Americans, who objected, while taking bribes for votes and making backroom deals, but didn’t feel it was good enough for Congress, so they exempted themselves holding themselves above the laws of the land they mandated. They wrote loopholes into the laws making “Insider Trading” legal for congressional members, but illegal for American citizens, who they send to jail and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal.
On the other hand, how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for law makers? It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office exempt themselves and hold themselves above the laws they mandate \and dish out for the American people.
On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then one must ponder who is America battling on a daily basis? It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!” Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who the U.S. federal government is battling or at war with if not Islam who attacked Americans on 911 and murdered Americans and continue to threaten Americans? In fact, there are radicals from Mexico and from the Middle East, who gained citizenship and swore to pledge allegiance to the U.S and the U.S. flag stand on U.S. soil and state that they will eliminate Western Civilization, democracy, and dominate America which is prohibited by U.S. Constitutional law, but Americans have been arrested for praying on public sidewalks including heterosexuals who are dancing or kissing in public. since 2009.
Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.” Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground. Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. I guess politicians can spin the laws in any direction that suits them, but not so for the American citizens. The NATO mission against Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the assassination of Gaddafi. The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried. It’s “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrannical leaders of Communist and Third World national. In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].”
Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of al-awalki, an converto to radical Islam, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.” But, he was denied “due process of law” and to the best of my knowledge, never charged with a crimes before he was taken out under Obama’s regime. Think about that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of any and all Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?” Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of lawand render Americans live on U.S. soil today without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant? One must ponder if a Tea Party member, or an Oathkeeper, or a Christian, Catholic, heterosexual, a Patriot, pro-Constitutional American, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-God, pro-right-to-life, and pro-Free Enterprise be targeted?
For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.”
Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally released after he was denied “due process of law” on U.S. soil as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.
David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and he could have been served with a subpoena orarrested, but instead American women, children, and men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration, except for the people who escaped. What crimes did the women and children and unborn babies commit, but even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil and a government becomes similar to a “mob rule.”
Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. The respected Constitutional Lawyer, Gerry Spence, stepped up to the plate in his defense.
Therefore, Americans must ask, “What happened to the Udall Bill that was proposed and would shred Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law?”
Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes. Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right? In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.
How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a “water boarding ” policy after 911. Should we not as – which is worse? Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and denying “due process of law that indefinitely detains any citizen – innocent or guilty – on U.S. soil? – or an implementing a “hit” list of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world based on an accusation only?
On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.” And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.” Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.
Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war on Libya? And, which nation is the “homeland” battling? We should ask under which authority is congress applying that provides congressional members the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny “due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032? ***(Thisarticle may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, an Irwin Award winning writer,poet, and author whose been published around the world as a 5 Star Review. Colombo’s first shocking self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” published late 2010 on amazon reveals the truth about the illusion of justice and how easily anyone can be targeted by the government and their lives destroyed. The second book, a fictional political Orwellian satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” exposes the U.N.’ redistribution of health and wealth and begs the question if the dinosaurs were depopulated or made extinct.
Rose Colombo has been featured in “The Journal of Commerce and Science” worldwide magazine; The Veterans Reporter; The Daily Law Journal published for lawyers and judges; Orange County Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post, L.A. Times, Seal Beach Journal, and more….interviewed on major and local radio and TV and produced and hosted her own created cable TV and am-FM and online radio shows with prominent guests. She is currently on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice, and social media.
Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings? Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government. Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money? After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement? Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if, Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?
Cut the Spending! Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama! He is the Print and Spend President. Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010! Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?
One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more! And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans! I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.
So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund. If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money. Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!
Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.
In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month. The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care. Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.
In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama! No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth. The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years. The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China. Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs. It’s small businesses that create more jobs. Instead, Obama created more government jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.
Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government? Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes. Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients. Social security is money earned, not welfare. Not only is Obama’s threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living. So, one must wonder if Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?
Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate. Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress. In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund. Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks, was deposited into a “Trust” Account.
Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property? How is diverting the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens considered ethical? How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff. Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.
Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable. In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected. Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.
So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?
In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama. Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA. China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?
About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. . On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters. Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.
Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars. Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk. Obama fired off 221 tomahawks – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people. Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news. He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.
Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt. For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953. Think about that!
How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president. In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008. Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.
But, Obama made history. Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion! He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.
Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder. Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?
Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.
Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt? China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.
The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work. The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A. Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer. President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations. He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A. Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.
In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078. Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years. By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615. In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion. But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.
But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion! Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there. He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher. So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?
2011: U.S. Population = 311, 756,198 (2008 = 304,421,946)
2011: U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291 (2008 = 108,228,953)
2011: Official Unemployed = 14,055,369 (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)
2011: Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)
2011: State Local Employees = 15, 892,215
2011: Federal Employees = 4,305,706
2011: U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347
2011: U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)
2011: U.S. Families = 82,102,337 (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]
2011: Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907 (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]
2011: Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470
2011: Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799
2011: Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising
2011: Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising
2011: Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising
2011: Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138
2011: Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]
2011: Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)
2011: Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising
2011: Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising – a substantial decrease as of 2011)
2011: Assets Per Citizen = $242,722 (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))
2011: U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]
2011: Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)
2011: Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281
2011: Total Debt Per Family = $669,109
2011: Savings Per Family = $6,953 [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]
2011: U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit: $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *
2011: National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503
2011: National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747
2011: Income Tax: $946,651,562,999 and rising *
2011: Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising
2011: Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]
2011: U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising
2011: U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)
I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans. Another example of waste is the multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs. But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!
2011: U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second
Note: The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!
Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!
(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt). Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas. You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com