Rose Colombo original (C) pub. 3/24/2012
Follow, Reblog, Like and Comment – Comments can be read by readers at the end of the article
- The Bible states, “Woe to you lawyers!’ Luke 11:46
- The definition of a U.S. Natural Born or Native Born Citizen as defined in the Constitution referred to as a requirement of Article II and references the Law of Nations, pub. by Emerich de Vattel, 1758 – written into the U.S. Constitution for definition as well as the Declaration of Independence as follows:
- “The U.S. natural-born citizen of a nation is a baby born to two U.S. natural-born citizens whose baby is born on U.S. soil at the time of birth.” In addition, “for if he is born of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth and not his country.”
Wake up, America! Ring the Liberty Bell loud and clear. The Liberty Bell is ringing out with alarm warning Americans that their U.S. Constitution is being shredded by a man, whose eligibility is in question as president of the United States as he is by-passing congress and the constitution and writing Executive Orders that deny access to Article II and Article IV without Congress invoking their authority to Repeal those executive orders. Article II and Article IV are blowing in the wind in an ugly direction. In fact, by Obama’s own writings and admission, he states that his father is “foreign-born” – a subject of Britain at the time of Obama’s birth – making Obama a subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948. Such improper vetting which has been brought before the court and congress does not reflect transparency and is not in accordance with Article II, thus leaving his eligibility without proper vetting and congressional certification as required by constitutional law, Article II, unresolved.
Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and U.S. Justices applying which would justify their decision to avoid Article II, a very important law of the land, as it involves the highest office in the land? Has the U.S. Congress relinquished their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, country, the flag, and fiduciary duty as they avoid and ignore Article II which remains of serious public interest to the American people? For example, since 2008, the congress continues to pass laws which the majority of Americans do not believe are in accordance with constitutional law, they boldly refuse to perform their fiduciary duty and pass laws without reading the laws by their own admittance, but instead, take bribes for votes.
In fact, the majority of Americans believe that the NDAA Law, the Patriot Act, mandated abortions, assassinations and hit lists and indefinite detention of Americans based on accusations are unconstitutional. Also, ObamaCare is not in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of Americans. Yet, the 111th congress didn’t seem to care as they passed unread laws that deny freedom and liberty under the guise of health care. In fact, they didn’t hold the executive office accountable for firing off 220 Tomahawks at Libya and killing civilians; or the millions granted to Solyndra; IMF; or the Fast and Furious program which killed innocent people! How is that justified when human life is no longer considered “sacred,” but “meaningless.”
Shall we then determine if the congress, senate, Justices, and federal judges, are working for or against the people since they have the definition of a U.S. Natural Born citizen at their finger tips known as the Law of Nations? What then shall we say to our children and grandchildren when America’s history is changed and inserted with false foreign history and our nation’s constitutional laws are shredded and blowing in the wind? Do we say, “We could have done some thing, but we did nothing?” Should we say, “We could have said some thing, but we remained silent?” Should we say, “We should have thrown the bums out, but we were fearful?” Is it not true that our non-vetted U.S. President with knowledge that vetting is required by Article II is a man, who concealed his identity from the world and the highest offices of government, as well as the American people, the only exception in 239 years?
Obama admitted that his lifetime hope and change is about fulfilling his father’s dreams, but that seems impossible since he admittedly only saw his dad once. His biological father, Barack Hussein Obama is reported in the news as a man who was already married to a Kenyan woman with two children, yet, Obama’s account is that Obama, sr. was married to Obama’s white mother. Stanley Ann Dunham, on or about 1961, but to-day, there is very little proof of any marriage or divorce when she remarried. How could she remarry without divorce papers in the USA? On the other hand, if Barack Hussein Obama, sr., married Stanley Ann Dunham on U.S. soil, he would have committed bigamy and committed a fraud upon his mother. So, the question remains, if his white mother married a man who was already married with children than the question raised is did Stanley Ann Dunham have knowledge of the marriage or if Barack Obama sr. committed a fraud upon his Ann Dunham while studying in the United States. In fact Barack Obama, Sr., an adult married man with children would have engaged in sexual relations with a white minor child at that time in the USA. which was a crime. The history of segregation up through the civil rights movement and even thereafter had been tightly enforced. In fact, up through through the late 60’s, if a Black man was seen with a white woman, riots could break out. If Obama senior married Stanley Ann Dunham, a white minor child, it would have taken place at a time when a Black man with a young white woman would have been a violation of segregation laws, but Obama presents it as if there weren’t any racial problems or objections and no one noticed. Obama’s on-line birth certificate lists his dad as African at the time of his birth, but Americans point out that there wasn’t any such race in America at that time, which is true. The term African-American wasn’t introduced until the early 1980’s. But, if his biological father was born in Africa then it would be correct to list his race as African, which confirms that his father is foreign-born, and a subject of Britain at Obama’s birth in 1961. Unfortunately, the birth certificates provided on-line are alleged to be forgeries or fakes an altered by forensic experts. Nevertheless, that would mean that Obama Senior passed his birthright to Obama as a Black African Kenyan from Muslim roots and a Subject of Great Britain.
Also, several news articles report that Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., attended Harvard Law School on a foreign student loan, but Obama points out that his father believed America was an oppressive nation. Perhaps, this is one of the reasons that Obama jr. stated about 2008 that other nations believe that America is an oppressive nation so he didn’t want to wear “that pin” the U.S. Flag, on his lapel or sing the National Anthem and place his hand on his heart. Obama believes that America must be transformed and that he’s been placed in power to bring hope and change and “redistribute” America’s wealth as he sees fit, as he stated that he is accountable to no one. After his dad returned to Kenya, the Kenyan news reported that Obama sr. was killed in a car accident. In the book Dreams of My Father, Obama inferred that he is troubled by his mother’s race, but he is working on his problem. Therefore, it’s only logical to conclude by Obama’s own admission that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., was foreign-born in Kenya and a Subject of Britain. He’s stated the same in his speeches and that he was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro and attended school a Catholic School in Indonesia, but it’s also noted that only Islamic studies can be taught in Indonesia and not Catholicism or Christianity or the person could be subject to a death sentence.
Questions Missed by Journalists Researching This Issue: I noted that not one Journalist, to my knowledge, asked the question if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro could it be that Lolo Soetoro is the biological dad since, he too, attended the University of Hawaii at the same time as Stanley Ann and Obama, sr. Also, it should be noted that if Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro while residing in Indonesia that their law makes Obama an automatic citizen of Indonesia upon marriage and only an Indonesian Citizen at that time could attend school in Indonesia. Another interesting point that Journalists missed is that if Stanley Ann married Lolo Soetoro, then wouldn’t she have to convert as a Muslim, under their Sharia Law? And, of course, there are those who believe Obama is the son of Malcolm X and his name in Hawaii on a recorded traffic warrant read, “Barri or Bari Shabazz.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-DikUMrkcU Video: Obama’s Lawyers Admit Birth Certificate is Forged
Well then, shall we just shred Article II as another “meaningless” law since congress has not invoked their powers to protect Article II, Article IV, or preserve Due Process of Law? Due Process of Law was established by our Forefathers and it is the only protection from tyranny that shields the American people when falsely accused of being an enemy; non-compliant, dangerous, or extremist. Should the government’s military forces be able to knock down your doors and drag you into the streets and execute you or indefinitely detain you without charges filed, without a lawyer, and without a trial? Are you aware that this happens in America based on accusations and that innocent people have been injured or killed, even children? Are you aware that this happened during Katrina. In fact, the police shot and killed innocent people who were standing on a bridge and in April 2012, three were sentenced to imprisonment and one police officer, who didn’t kill anyone was given a lighter sentence. Also, there were people, including seniors, who were forced out of their homes as they searched for guns, and manhandled. Ten thousand people were locked inside the dome and denied the right to leave, but indefinitely detained. There were reports swept under the carpet of hospital patients having been euthanized.
Is the Great Republic being diminished and brought to her knees by tyrannical laws; such as the NDAA Law, and the Patriot Act, or the Rapiscam, oops, I mean the Rapiscan full body naked x-ray and radiation scanner operated by unlicensed techs by a thug like system of being thrown into the microwave oven and naked radiated or else choose door #2 and upon entry submit to have a TSA worker moles and grope you and your children and parents, unlicensed health care professionals at airports? Americans punished for non-compliance (non-compliance is a term used by socialists), yet the Muslims are exempted?
How is it that ObamaCare which is not a law, but an umbrella set of laws which includes hundreds of new restructured laws, regulations, mandates, punishments for Americans who aren’t favored and opted out are having every freedom and liberty denied under ObamaCare which is established and guaranteed in the Constitution? The 111th Congress admits that they never read the 2,000 pages of punishment and taxes, including the secret $17 trillion in additional taxation, but approved the unconstitutional laws by congress, which is a failure to perform their fiduciary duty as lawmakers. Ironically, this unjust, unfair, and inequitable new set of dictatorial restructured laws reeks of favoritism, nepotism, and collectivism, which in my opinion, replaces freedom and liberty, and replaces the U.S. Constitution. In fact, ObamaCare favors millions of his union supporters, Muslims, illegals, and refugees, who won’t be punished and won’t have to pay up front for their own death panels, or mandated abortions, mandated vaccinations, mandated early end of life counseling. Obamacare includes includes the threat of punishment, i.e, jail and penalties for those who don’t comply or pay up front for services not rendered and may never be rendered also known as death panels. The enslaved will be forced to pick up the tab for all those who are new immigrants, refugees, illegals as well as prisoners and federal workers.
Are there still three branches of government in existence within the United States or is it all theatrics? Since 2008, the majority of Americans have concern as they witness the unethical actions of Congress and the Judiciary who appear to have relinquished their powers and morphed into one branch of government known as the Executive Branch. If the congressional and judiciary branches of government fail in their fiduciary duty to exercise their powers and prevent the shredding of the U.S. Constitution then the Rule of Checks and Balances is meaningless, as well. After all, they do seem to have stepped aside and granted the executive branch carte blanc rights to absolute power.
We The People are quite aware that Article II has been rendered meaningless by the Justice Department, the Congress, and the Executive Branch. Well then, how is that happening in America? Justice Thomas stated at a hearing, the Justices intentionally “avoid” Article II! He also inferred that a person no longer has to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be president – not anymore – which left questions as to what Justice Thomas knew about the 2008 elections and Obama’s eligibility. The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born or U.S. Native born Citizen has been defined for 235 years until 2008 as written in the book titled, the “Law of Nations, and is the book which U.S. justices and congress define laws. The Law of Nations is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution and the Law of Nations is used by Law Professors for definition.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBWuJNcnvG8 –Video: Obama admits he was born Oin Kenya
In other words, isn’t it true that a foreign-born baby, or a baby born to one foreign-born parent, even if one parent is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, is not eligible to be a U.S. President because they do not meet the requirement of being a U.S. Natural Born Citizen as required by Article II? Even foreign nations require the same unless there is a coup d’etat in the works. An American can’t go to the Middle East and apply to be the King of Saudi Arabia or the President of Iran. Obama may not be eligible to be the president of Africa because Obama inherited from his father, his birth right as Subject of Britain. An American can’t go to Great Britain and apply to be King of the UK. But, maybe Obama’s chances would be greater if he requested to be Knighted by the British Queen, than by the leaders of Africa, based on his being a Subject of Great Britain. After all, Obama has a complicated and complex background and he has claims of being white, Irish, Black, African, Kenyan, a British Subject, Muslim, Christian, U.S. Natural Born Citizen born in Hawaii, a prominent lawyer, law professor, community organizer, as well as an adopted son of Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro, where he lived and studied in Indonesia, as stated he is “one of them.” Barry Soetoro became an Indonesia Citizen upon adoption. Barry or Obama’s Kenyan grandma stated she was present when he was born in a Kenyan hospital.
There are documents relating to Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate posted by the Kenyan Parliament which were published in the Kenyan Parliamentary records as they were concerned about Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship at the time he was elected US President. The record stated that Obama was born in Kenya and the he is a Citizen of Kenya and a Subject of Great Britain, published back in 2008. The Parliament stated in the documents that they were surprised that America must not require that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be eligible to be an elected U.S. President.
On the other hand, babies born to foreigners on U.S. soil are referred to as inhabitants or foreigners and upon being legalized by immigration are known as naturalized citizens, but they can’t inherit the same birth rights of the U.S. natural-born and U.S. native-born children of the U.S. Natural or Native born fathers which are passed down from generation to generation making only the U.S. Natural Born Citizen eligible to become a U.S. President. Since 2008, Obama has stated a myriad of times on television and in writing that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., is a native-born Kenyan and a subject of Britain as well as an African and a Muslim. Even the Prime Minister of Kenya stated Obama was born in Kenya. After all, anyone with common sense realizes that it doesn’t make any sense and it’s definitely not logical or economically sound for any responsible citizen to spend $1,000,000 plus with the intent of concealing a $35 certified copy of a birth certificate from federal judges.
At the time of Obama’s alleged dad’s birth, Kenya was a British Colony, under the rule of the United Kingdom, where his Native born father, was born as a British subject governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 making his biological children, including Barack Hussein Obama, jr., subjects of Great Britain at birth by passing down his birthright to his son. The British Nationality Act of 1948 (part II, Section 5) states that subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after commencement of this act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of his birth. Again, Obama inherited his birthright from his foreign-born Kenyan-Muslim father and Subject of Great Britain. So it matters not where Obama was born – Kenya or Hawaii – except for truth – the fact is that he has a foreign-born father which renders him a Subject of Great Britain and making him ineligible by U.S. Constitutional law, Article II, which requires a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen even if he was born in Hawaii as he claims. It doesn’t even matter if his mother was a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. Even former Ca. Governor Schwarzenegger stated that he can’t be a U.S. President because his parents were born in Europe. Congressman Rubio stated he can’t run for U.S. President because one or both of his parents weren’t U.S. Natural Born Citizens. So, how is it that congress doesn’t recall the definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen as of 2008?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhuToYz2KMA Video: Philip J. Berg, esq., Obama isnot eligible to be a U.S. President
Indonesian Adoption: We The People also have read that his mother married Lolo Soetoro and lived in Indonesia with Obama jr. with the stepfather. Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama by marriage making Obama, a minor child, an Indonesian citizen, which allowed Obama to attend a madrassa, which he calls a Catholic school, but the teachers can’t teach Christianity or Catholicism on Muslim soil, but are required to teach Islamic studies in Indonesia. The intense memorization of the Koran in a Madrassa makes a big difference of what a child is taught in Muslim nations and where his deep rooted beliefs, religion, and ideologies are seeded. He also admits that his stepfather changed Obama’s name to Barry Soetoro. Research of Indonesian citizenship documentation reads that Indonesia didn’t recognize dual citizenship at the time Obama and his mom lived in Indonesia nor did the U.S. recognize dual citizenship, so upon Obama’s returning to the U.S. as an adult, he would be required to repatriate himself, but did he do that? And even if he did repatriate himself then why doesn’t he produce his immigration papers as a naturalized citizen based on the fact his dad is foreign-born? And, how is it that he allegedly received foreign student loans since one must be foreign-born to receive foreign student loans as questioned by constitutional lawyers?
The eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq, on or about 2008, was denied by Justice Roberts. I wrote aletter to Justice Roberts and each U.S. Justice in support of Berg’s eligibility lawsuit stating that if they didn’t hear Berg’s lawsuit and resolve eligibility as required by Article II that there could be a very bad case precedent set in 2012 which could cause anti-American foreigners, usurpers, and illegals to challenge Article II in the courts using Obama’s 2008 vetting case as a legal basis. How then without properly identifying a U.S. President or correcting the record legally for historical and public record are his Executive Orders considered constitutional and legal? Perhaps, the Congress and Justices do not want to admit their failure to vet a candidate properly, but the problem won’t disappear like a rabbit in a hat.
Genius is the word that should be used when referring to our Forefathers, for they understood that the day would come when federal public servants and Wall Street would fail in their fiduciary duty to their country and citizens. They knew that the day might come when federal lawmakers might attempt to avoid, re-write, ignore, manipulate, shred, and deny U.S.citizens freedom and liberty and even attempt to replace U.S. Constitutional Laws with a new set of restructured laws that deny every freedom and liberty under the guise of health care or under the guise of protecting citizens from terrorism. Freedom and Liberty has been established and guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and provides specific rights, i.e., due process of law, sovereignty, right to choose, and the right to life, with the intent of preventing tyranny.
Again, never forget the legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen which is required with the specific intent of preserving the Republic for future generations of U.S. Natural Born Citizens. Article II is required in order to prevent a foreigner from usurping office, whose passions lie elsewhere and whose intent could risk the safety of our nation. Article II is required to be followed by law because a U.S. President must “Love” his country and “love” the Natural Born Citizens; he must “desire” to preserve the laws, traditions, and culture passed down to biological children from their U.S. Natural Born Fathers, therefore preserve our nation’s culture.
Article II is the most important law of all! Our forefathers created Article II to preserve Western Culture for future generations, so a foreigner cannot usurp the laws and steal a nation or pilfer its wealth to be used for agendas other than to benefit the American people. Article II provides security that a U.S. Natural Born U.S. President inherits their birthright to become a candidate and be elected as a U.S. President, which is a birth right passed down through generations, from their natural-born fathers. Obama’s father didn’t have the U.S. natural-born birth right to pass down to Obama, therefore, he should step down and allow a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to exercise his or her birth right as a U.S. President. Have U.S. Natural Born Citizens been denied their birthright to be a U.S. Natural Born President?
Again, it’s important to understand that Article II doesn’t allow for compromise, but requires that a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born or Native born Citizen. The Forefathers intentionally inserted the Law of Nations into the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence so generations of Americans could always refer to the legal definition of constitutional law. An unvested man, who concealed his identity using Executive Orders with the intent to by-pass Article II after swearing an oath to uphold Article II, shouldn’t be allowed to remain a mystery from the people or supported by congress and the judiciary. If that is the case, then the congress and judiciary must take the responsibility if our nation is injured as their gross negligence and failure to uphold Article II , which is causing grave doubt and distrust, in the minds of the U.S. citizens, even around the world.
A majority of Americans fear that their nation could be changed and their lives jeopardized by the failure of public servants to perform their fiduciary duty according to their sworn oaths. Remember, Khrushchev said that a nation can be taken down without dropping one bomb, but most recently, the Russians have stated that the Americans are stupid for not vetting a U.S. President.
In fact, Eric Holder made a very disturbing statement at a college with a majority of Blacks in attendance when he stated, Americans will be polarized! Within 10-15 years, the face of America will be changed. He was called out on such a statement and made to apologize.
Article II requires a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be a U.S. President, so our democratic Republic can’t be overthrown by foreigners, period.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FdKmi-Tceo Video: Definition of U.S. Natural Born Citizen
Never think lightly of the GENIUS of great men, our Forefathers, who understood tyranny, yet, they provided brilliant laws which allow Americans a guaranteed right and a duty to resist peacefully, or even exercise force in some cases, against oppressive laws if the citizens fear their government is threatening the safety of its citizens and their families, property, or country, clearly written into U.S. constitution and stated laws. Remember, under the Clinton administration, there were two attacks by our government against American citizens at WACO and at Ruby Ridge. American men, women, and children, were killed on U.S. soil versus upholding Article IV and exercising the rights of the citizens to access due process of law.
For example, in the 1970s, Chile was a democratic government with a democratic leader. Henry Kissinger mentors U.S. candidates and presidents such as Nixon, Ford, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Palin, and McCain. Kissinger and Nixon were behind the veil when Chile’s government was overthrown and the lives of the Chilean citizens changed over night. The citizens of Chile were shocked when the coup d’etat began bombing their city and firing upon innocent citizens. The citizens were taken over by tyrannical militants and they lost their freedom and liberty over night. Free enterprise was devastated as military tanks rolled in rendering all innocent citizens helpless. The frightened and abused citizens were beaten, rounded up and jailed, tortured, killed, separated from their loved ones, and forced to pay extremely high taxes as a tyrant named Pinochet was ushered in to rule the people with an iron fist After he established his tyrannical government, he released the remaining citizens from prison. Those who opposed the government’s agendas were arrested and indefinitely detained or executed. How then do we allow a public servant/s to devalue the worth of human life if the congress places no value upon the lives of its own citizens and views people as “non-persons” or enemies of the state? In fact, millions of future citizens of a nation can be wiped out by government mandated abortions! In fact, the book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, addresses abortions and can be reviewed on-line at amazon or by clicking on http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Thus, it is important to wonder why Congress and law enforcement have skipped over the fact that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro attempted to insert an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill in 2008 prior to elections, an amendment that would eliminate the words, U.S. Natural Born Citizen, from Article II, since Bill Clinton had inferred that Obama is not a citizen, as well as, McCain, during the presidential campaign of 2008? Such a move would have let Obama off the hook as far as eligibility goes or the Kenyan government believing American didn’t care about Article II’s requirements back in 2008.
Why would Senator Hillary Clinton, running for the same office in the same election, even want to help Obama secretly remove the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from Article II of the U.S. Constitution?
Why would there be allegations that Senator Pelosi altered the wording before signing the Certification involving Obama’s vetting records?
Why would Obama’s Kenyan Grandmother and the Kenyan Prime Minister state that Obama was born in Kenya, as well as other on-line birth certificates posted by Kenyan newspapers?
In conclusion, based upon the knowledge admitted by Obama that his biological Kenyan father born as a subject of Britain, Barack Hussein Obama sr – and only his mom being a U.S. natural-born citizen – baffles the average mind of how congress and the judiciary continue to justify that Obama jr. was qualified to be elected as a U.S. President in 2008, and thereafter, as required by Article II and as defined by our laws which is at the finger tips of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Congress. Shouldn’t the admitted fact that Obama’s father is a foreign-born Kenyan and a British subject making Obama a British subject at birth in 1961 – be considered more than enough information along with his inserting amendments into an existing executive order with the intent of concealing of his identity immediately enacted after swearing an oath to uphold Article II. His self-serving and self-protection amendment provides precise instructions which state that only by his consent or the advice of Eric Holder can his identity be released for public scrutiny, even to congress, or law enforcement for identical purposes should congress or law enforcement desire to conduct hearings relating to his eligibility to prove or disprove if he meets the requirements of Article II established by the U.S. Constitution.
Obviously, it is important that the American people remember they are the government, and this federal regime has trampled on “limited government” – trampled on the laws of the land. Americans have constitutional laws allowing them to exercise and resist peacefully against unconstitutional or rigged elections, illegal donations from foreign sources; improper vetting procedures; and unconstitutional laws by petitioning, emailing, calling, writing, changing laws, researching, and filing Grievances with the U.S. Congress. Shouldn’t congress suspend Obama’s job as president and his Executive Orders until they complete an investigative hearing and determine his eligibility? It’s only when the congress exercises their authority to certify the truth on public record that U.S. Natural Born Americans will feel vindicated from being called names, such as “birthers” for attempting to preserve the nation’s Western laws and culture for future and current generations of U.S. Natural Born kids, grandkids, and future generations.
If it is wrong to request that Congress uphold Article II then how is it right for them to remain as lawmakers, for if that is the case, should they refuse to uphold constitutional law and perform their fiduciary duty – have they now become law breakers? Do they not desire to preserve the U.S. Constitution as well as the Republic, Western culture, Judeo-Christian roots and traditions, the economy; the preservation of freedom and liberty, the preservation of due process of law, the preservation of the right to life, so future U.S. Natural Born Citizens can inherit the same birthrights for which they are entitled, not foreigners who immigrate into the U.S., but U.S. Natural Born citizens able to fulfill their duty if they choose to become a U.S. Natural Born President? But if that Birthright is stolen by a usurper aka a foreign immigrant than the U.S. Natural Born Citizen is denied their inheritance of their U.S. Natural Born birth right and their legal right – should they so choose – to become a U.S. Natural Born President of the United States of America – a most honorable position to embrace and cherish.
It’s a mystery as to why the 111th and 112th Congress and the U.S. Justices would fail to uphold Article II, but it is the most important law established by our Forefathers as well as Article IV which provides to every individual their right to exercise due process of law. There’s a statement I wrote in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, “Without due process of law, there is nothing. Nothing but tyranny.”
- On or about 2001 and 2008, and most recently, Obama stated that his goal was to “disarm” Americans on Meet the Press about 2008. (He launched Fast & Furious in 2009 with $10,000,000 of stimulus money promised for jobs). Obama stated in 2001 and 2008 and in 2011 that congress and the constitution are “meaningless.” About 2001 and 2008, he stated that at the “Constitution is nothing more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] which need to be changed,” which may have been scrubbed on the internet. The statements of his father being foreign-born and the myriad of other allegations should be enough for congress to suspend Obama’s presidency until the congress, and senate can sort out the truth based upon constitutional law. It would appear that whenever questions arise relating to eligibility of a public servant’s qualification, then the laws he has implemented shouldn’t be rubber stamped and enforced, until the truth is certified and made public. It is time to Ring the liberty Bell</strong>! In fact, it’s the fiduciary duty of the U.S. Congress, Senate, and Justices to uphold their sworn oaths and uphold the constitution, including Article II. U.S. federal public servants should represent the will of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and U.S. Native Born Americans in exchange for their jobs and wages. The failure of these public servants to acknowledge the Grievances of the American people shall only cause their cries to ring out louder until the winds stop blowing in an ugly direction. ***(This article may be shared but not Plagiarised by a Third Party – all (C) rights reserved by the writer, Rose Colombo)
Rose Colombo has proposed laws as the Founder, Women Fight Back, a grassroots movement she formed in 1989 that spread in the news like wildfire. She proposed laws, which were implemented, related to Family Law and Joint Custody. As an invited speaker, shes addressed the Ca. Senate, Justice Department, Criminal Planning providing recommendation related to Family Law as an Advocate, Invited Guest of the Granada Forum, L.A. Press Speaker’s Bureau (standing ovation); The Pro-Justice Summit, Chamber of Commerce, Pre-Paid Legal Services, and community groups. She’s received many awards for her writings on injustices; and she wrote a newspaper column, One-Woman’s Opinion, award-winner, for a local paper. For more information about Rose, google http://www.fightbacklegalabuse.com
Rose’s 5 Star Review Books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks, and Radicals” a political satire and orwellian adventure story about Obamasaurus is avaialble ab amazon.com
Radio: Rose Colombo N The Justice Club, every MWF, 9am-10:30a pst-usa and 12-1:30p est, Listen Live worldwide online, podcasta and (347) 324-3704 – Social and Political in depth commentary on specific issues….Listen live at http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Radio: Women Fight Back, Co-Hosts Rose Colombo and Victoria Lee Scott, every Wednesday, 10:30a-noon pst and 1:30-3p est – both Beauty Advisers with experience in the beauty industry, Political Activists, and Radio Hosts, who came together to share their knowledge on beauty tips, stress relief tips, women’s issues, quotes, and social and political rants. Listen live worldwide online, podcasts, or at (347) 324-3704 – All shows archived at Freedomizer Radio – Listen live http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be legal, political, financial, or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. visit my website for bio, book, photo, videos, awards – www.fightbacklegalabuse.com