Listen Taped Live Click on Constitutionally Speaking currently being changed to Women Fight Back -Special Guest, Jan McFarland, Educator and Advocate for Mental Illness, reveals a study on the abuses of the Mentally Ill thrown into Prisons and the increased Suicides with Co-Hosts, Rose, Brenda, and Victoria, plus Political Rants…..Click on the Link – Follow – Reblog – Like – Comments Welcome
Listen Taped live – Women Fight Back – Guest – Rosalyn Kohn, author, Random Acts of Kindness – Rose and co-host Brenda discuss the serious problem facing America’s Homeless today…..(Women Fight Back replacing Constitutionally Speaking)
Follow Facebook/Rose Colombo
Facebook/Victoria Lee Scott
written by Rose Colombo, original pub. (c) 5/11/2012, Rev. 6/17/2012
“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?”Ronald Reagan, (pub. Abortion and theConscience of the Nation)On or about February 18, 2009, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General stated, “There will be significant demographic changes this nation never faced…There will be no majority race in the United States in about 15 years…the coming diversity that could be such a powerful positive force will instead become a reason for stagnation and polarization. Although, there is a crying need for all of us to know the contributions of Black Americans, the Black history month is still a testament to the problems that has inflicted African-Americans throughout our stay in the country….Black history is critical to the knowledge of the Black history experiment.”
Although, Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, addressed a majority of Black Americans and students at a college, his comments raise the question if his words reflected distinct statements which could reveal a sinister and secret U.N. Agenda 21 with a stated goal of reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. A major part of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal and Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” focuses upon mandated abortions in America and Third World nations at 50% by the year 2015. Ironically, the news recently disclosed that USAG Holder’s wife owns an abortion clinic which raises the question if Obama’s mandated abortion laws approved by senators Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, in 2007, and the fact that Holder worked under the Clinton administration, is a Conflict of Interest?
Mandated abortions combined with other depopulation agendas such as ObamaCare, which includes taxpayer-funded government mandated abortions in America, also allows for infanticide. Is it possible that mandated Abortions could lead to government mandated abortions, not personal choice, which was implemented by Communist China for about 25 years? China’s leaders determined the female unborn babies would be aborted under their mandated law for depopulation purposes or pregnant women would be punished for non-compliance. Holder’s comments reflect Obama’s Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act aka New millennium Goals, which the non-vetted senator Obama implemented on or about December 7, 2007, and approved without the knowledge of the majority of U.S. citizens.
Should we not raise the question and ask if anyone would want their unborn baby or unborn grand baby to be used for food? Is it morally right to allow corporations to grind up unborn babies aka fetuses and use them for food additives into artificial sweeteners? Is that not to be considered as cannibalism? How many people approve of aborted unborn babies having their brains removed for experimentation as reported in the Orange County Register newspaper as a scandal by a major hospital? Millions of people believe that it’s moral to use unborn babies for stem cell research or for cloning. These statements are part of the reality relating to mandated abortions, which is downplayed by the Obama administration, Wall Street, and the media.
Obviously, mandated abortions increase taxes, and fund Planned Parenthood, and generate big-profits for abortionists, as well as some businesses within the food industry. On or about 2009, my blog informed U.S. citizens that Obama’s Global Poverty Act mandates worldwide abortions, which is in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21, a goal to depopulate the earth at 50%, by the year 2015. Senator Alan Keyes attempted to warn Americans that Obama’s agendas included radical programs. In fact, Senator Obama failed to disclose his obsession with mandated abortions during the elections which I refer to as “Obama’s War on Unborn Babies.” He presented himself as a traditional family man with pro-life agendas when interviewed by Pastor Rick, who later on, incorporated Chrislam into his church. The actions taken against unborn babies worldwide by the non-vetted U.S. Senator and President, Barack Hussein Obama, lead many to believe that he’s the most pro-abortion president to ever hit America.
Furthermore, Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare also includes tax funded mandated abortions against the will of the majority of U.S. citizens. Once again, Obama signed the Global Poverty Act passed on or about December 7, 2007, and he signed it into law as an Executive Order on or about January 2009. The Global Poverty Act is also known as The Millennium Global Goal and there wasn’t objection by the 111th or 112th U.S. Congress. The reason for the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goal to reduce the population of the planet under the guise of reducing world poverty and saving the planet. Obama’s worldwide mandated abortion laws target not only the USA, but Third World nations, especially Africa. Obviously, if the federal government and the U.N. successfully reduce the population at 50% by 2015 or 90% by 2027, poverty would be nearly eliminated, but so would mankind. These programs won’t save the planet but destroy the planet. This leads me to ask how many citizens are asking their leaders and the supporters of Agenda 21 on what authority are they secretly implementing a program that includes depopulation and who made them God with the right to determine who lives and who dies.
Recently, in the year 2012, Obama shouted out in the media that women’s rights should include taxpayer-funded entitlements and their right to access Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood abortion clinics. He strongly promotes the right of young women to access free condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the majority of democrats and Rhinos support tax funded Planned Parenthood for-profit abortion clinics. Abortion is big business! It allows the federal government to substantially increase taxes for this big private corporation. Planned Parenthood is similar to a manufacturing business that operates an assembly line of commodities, but in this case, the assembly line’s commodities are pregnant women and unborn babies. Throughout history, mankind built businesses by hunting and killing animals, fishing, and harvesting trees or plants for big profits. But, Planned Parenthood is granted millions of tax dollars under ObamaCare to hunt for commodities known as pregnant women and unborn babies similar to a seamless assembly line for-profit. It is the unborn babies who are becoming the extinct species on the planet.
Remember, there’s more than one way to depopulate the planet, but mandated abortions and same-sex agendas are definitely included as well as radiation. It’s a fact that there’s more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black American communities than anywhere else in America. It appears that Agenda 21 and the Obama administration’s mandated worldwide abortion agendas target the poor, ethnicities, religions, and races, and includes mandating worldwide abortions in Third World nations, such as Africa and India. It appears that Obama’s Global Poverty Act is implemented as an Executive Order titled The Millennium Development Goal which appears to be in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21. The unconstitutional laws implemented recently in the USA appear to be linked into Agenda 21, i.e., ObamaCare, the
Also, under the guise of women’s rights, the Obama administration is focusing on young women, pregnant women, and unborn babies, through the promotion of entitlements such as mandated abortions, and promoting contraception. The Obama regime targeted the Catholic Church and Catholic hospitals, who oppose abortion and the distribution of contraceptives and the morning after pill. The Catholic Church filed a lawsuit against the federal government’s mandated abortions and distribution of contraceptives. Mandated Abortions offends the moral compass of the Catholic religion. Shall we not ask if the U.N.’s Agenda 21 is a program that intends to use U.S. leaders to circumvent the Constitution and the U.S. Congress?
It would appear that such an agenda is implemented to control the masses with the intent of creating a one world government. It’s not possible to create a one world government if U.S. laws aren’t shredded or the borders aren’t opened up for the migration of foreigners. How then is such an agenda not sending up red flags and shocking the minds of every U.S. citizen, as well as citizens around the world, especially citizens living in Third World Nations who are on the radar for depopulation? Furthermore, Communist China mandated the death by abortion of 400,000,000 unborn baby girls for more than two decades. Government mandated abortions is a genocide. Mandated abortions reduces the population of unborn babies who are the future citizens. The U.N. and the U.S. didn’t oppose the mandated abortions in China. In fact, if any pregnant woman attempted to conceal the birth of a baby girl, they were punished. And, the Chinese government’s mandated health care programs required the monitoring of young girl’s menstrual cycles. Hillary Clinton and Diane Feinstein support the U.N.’s Rights of the Child which denies U.S. parents the right to exercise parental rights. This means the all family law matters in the U.S. could be rendered under a U.N. flag versus a U.S. flag as the new one world court.
Once again, the U.N. has been working hand in hand with past and current U.S. Presidents and supporting Congressional members, as well as international leaders who approve of redistributing America’s wealth as well as reducing the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015. They are playing God and their goals include mandated abortions, infanticide and partial birth abortions. They believe that the federal government should replace the parents.
Remember, the key supporters of Obama’s worldwide mandated laws were senators Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Clinton, and Kerry and a majority of representatives. After the Global Poverty Act was signed into law, senator Obama immediately filed the application to compete in the presidential race of 2008 even though he previously stated that he was too “inexperienced” to be a U.S. President. Consequently, the U.N.’s Agenda 21is known as a sustainable rural development program using U.S. tax dollars for the redistribution of America’s wealth with the alleged goal of re-developing Third World nations by wealthy banksters. The question should be pondered if the globalists are successful at depopulating the targeted nations how then shall mankind live, but only as slaves? Thus, if there are traitors in the nation who are working to polarize and destroy America by comforting and abetting the enemy and supplying them with money and military defenses how then shall the American people stop this evil machine?
Also, there are rumors that the government might install vending machines into every school stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Well, Obama promised change and change has come to America under the guise of women’s rights, the war on terrorism, and health care. The truth is that the liberal agenda began back in the 1970s, when the feminists, who were mostly same-sex women, encouraged women not to have more than two kids. The feminists influenced young married women that motherhood was a thankless job as well as being a housewife. The feminists managed to make young married women feel guilty about being a wife and mother and caused them to feel that they should be out working. They encouraged young wives and mothers to get out of the house – get divorced – go out and work – under the guise of equal rights. President Reagan, warned women that equal rights for women would result in a new struggle for women, especially single mothers, in the future. He also warned against Pro-Choice laws. In fact, Americans criticize China for passing a law that says they can’t have more than one child, but we aren’t far behind telling American women not to have more than two kids and that they should abort their babies instead of putting the babies up for adoption.
Americans complain there’s fewer U.S. Natural Born Citizens on U.S. soil. That’s true. There are fewer births of U.S. natural Born citizens today, because foreigners don’t take contraceptives. Most foreigners aren’t aborting millions of unborn babies. They intend to have large families. America has aborted about 70,000,000 plus babies since Roe v. Wade was approved and we disgusted by Hitler? We’re stabbing babies sin the head and ripping apart their body parts and selling them for profit and experiments, but we send people to jail for harming an animal, and yes, protect animals, but what about human beings? We are killing our future U.S. Natural Born Citizens who are needed to preserve the United States of America for only the natural born citizens of a civilization can preserve their civilization, traditions, laws, culture, and sovereignty.
Furthermore, scientists and researchers around the world willingly use the fetuses for experiments, stem cell research, or cloning. They are alleged to be selling body parts, organs, and human tissue which is against the law. Great Britain was the first country to receive licensing for cloning. It’s imperative that citizens of the world and Western civilization question if mandated abortions is a sinister program that is being carried out by the secret globalists under the guise of women’s rights. They appear to seek world power and control through unprecedented mandates that go against God, the Bible, and morality. These mandates include excessive regulations, and cruel and unusual taxation and punishments with the intent of reaching their globalist goal with their hope for change and transformation of the USA and the world. Is freedom and liberty and God-given unalienable rights an illusion, or is a One World Order an illusion. The goal of the globalist appears to be a one world superior race – slave vs. master – a one world leader – and a collective global utopia? (This article may be shared, but not changed or Plagiarized by a Third Party). Scroll Down to the bottom of the page to Like, Share, & Comment
Follow Facebook/Rose Colombo or
Facebook/The Justice Club – Twitter Twitter@Rose4Justice
Books: Irwin Award Winner and 5 Star Review: Fight Back Legal Abuse – self-help featured around the world -www.amazon.com
Books: Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals- 5 Star Political Satire – http://www.amazon.com
Radio: The Justice Club – MWF -9am-10:30am pst and 12-1:30pm est-usa -google Freedomizer Radio at blogtalkradio -listen worldwide online, podcasts, (347) 324-34704 – Follow – Share – http://www.freedomizerradio.com
Public Speaker csontact Rose4Jusice@verizon.net – Rose has been a guest speaker at the L.A. Press Club Speakers Bureau, Granada Forum, Chambers of Commerce, DOJ Criminal Planning; California Senate, community groups, and the Pro-Justice Summit
Other: Social Media and You Tube
“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”
Wake up, America! How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land? It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a restructured set of laws replacing freedom and liberty, in my opinion. ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments – the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!
In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must notgo down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”
After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers. A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period! There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress.
So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval? Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself – the authority to conceal his identity from the government – and from the public. It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval. When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land? This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval? Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?
Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law? This makes it very difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing Obama to write an “amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge, Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.
The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent foreign and anti-American usurpers from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President. It is the birthright of every U.S. Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected. The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions, and for the preservation of Western Civilization so future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.
For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America. He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions. Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority.
A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions. Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education. All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens.
A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.”
Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation? It appears to me that the American people should be very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law. How is that?
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections. The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place. In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.
Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit. On the day of the inauguration about January 2009, Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech. Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV. A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.
But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II, the question remains if he intended to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal? Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself the authority to conceal his identification records from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals? So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?
Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical? After all, Article II requires identification of the public servant and proof that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.
On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws. Thus, how is an amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to alter Article II to the 111th Congress and seek Congressional approval?
So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record. The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret “amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.
Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses. After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor. The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections. And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual. After the elections of 2008, published records from the Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record. If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information.
As I stated, this begs the question of why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II be considered an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?
These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth. And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President. Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.
How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens. ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved. The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims, SEIU union members, possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals. So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty, then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?
In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.
ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation. Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off taxes of the hard working American citizens. ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.
Therefore, I have three questions: 1) How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress? 2) How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people; 3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare? (This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices. She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices. Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –
Rose Colombo, award-winning author, Legal Advocate, Activist, and Coach, created the question that rang out across the nation in 2009, when she posed the question, “How is the Obamacare “Mandate” Constitutional or legal? She sent the question to every congressional member in her worldwide Blog, “Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal” and her question was read with her name on the congressional floor and debated in the Supreme Court. (pub (c). 4/6/2012, rev 3/29/2012, rev 4/27/2013, 6/21/2013), rev. 10/8/2013
The End Times are Upon the World! That was the cry of many, but the Mayans may not have been stating that December 12, 2012 was the end of the world, but signaling that it’s the beginning of the end under the Obama regime working within the federal government’s intent to “fundamentally transform ” America taking American to a dangerous crossroad leaving Americans vulnerable to unconstitutional laws that could lead to the death of millions of Americans and future U.S. Natural Born Citizen!
The Obama regime appears to be preparing to implement police states and approving unconstitutional and immoral laws upon the American people. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, asked the question if the federal government’s next mandate is to order that all Americans buy Broccoli, a consumer product or elect a dog for U.S. President if the vetting laws and Identification laws aren’t required!
The US Supreme Court Justices debated the question of the “mandate” which I created and sent to every Congressman, blogged worldwide, and ended up read on the congressional floor with my name. The 112th Congress was negligent and appeared derelict in their duty which requires that they read and study each law in-depth, but they approved 2700 pages of unread laws which shocked the nation and rubber stamped it in favor of Obama when they took bribes for votes!
The duties of a U.S. President are limited, yet this non-vetted and unidentified president has been granted absolute powers to declare the Congress and the Constitution basically as meaningless and stated that he could do whatever he wants and no one can stop him because he has a phone and a pen and he’s the Commander-in-Chief, but he’s not the Commander-in-Chief of the American people; in fact, it is the American people who are his Commander-in-Chief and who must take back the pen and the phone before more Americans die on the battlefield, not just the foreign battlefield, but the domestic battlefield on U.S. soil as declared by Obama and Congress.
In an unprecedented announcement, Speaker Pelosi announced that Congress approved the unread mandates, regulations, taxes, and punishments included in Obamacare without performing their duty and studying each law, but she declared Americans would like it after it’s approved so they can find out what’s in it sort of like a Jack in the Box affect, only Americans found out that it was more like “Chuckie” jumping out and attacking and shredding the U.S. Constitution with his knife.
Today, Obama and Congress shamelessly exempt themselves without any constitutional authority from signing up, paying up, and from liability or punishment for passing the unread Obamacare and approving it with a rubber stamp! They discriminate against Americans who aren’t in their inner circle as well as Muslims, Refugees from the Middle East, Donors, Bundlers, SEIU and others.
After the Obamacare red carpet was stained with a series of serious glitches and billions are being spent to try to fix something that can’t be fixed, the truth is that Americans are losing their existing health care coverage and suffering because they can’t access their doctors or treatments or else they’re treatments and medications are unaffordable or the deductibles and premiums are unaffordable, so now there is equality! Not only do illegals, and the Muslims and all those who didn’t have health care prior to Obamacare was implement, it’s a fact that Americans will also be without health care as more hospitals close their doors and retreat to becoming an Urgent Care facility. And, that’s not to mention the millions of jobs that will be lost because of Obamacare! Obamacare is actually making more Americans very sick!
Wake Up, Americans! Are the majority of Americans aware that former impeached President Bill Clinton ordered a study on “Human Capital?” Recently, Bill Clinton was in the news alluding that Americans will like Communism. Hillary Clinton made international news during the congressional hearings when she was questioned about her friend, who was the U.S. Ambassador, and 3 murdered military men killed by terrorist attacks at Benghazi and she angrily replied, “What difference does it make?” Also, President Obama hit the news when asked about murdered American soldiers and the US Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and he casually remarked that they were mere “bumps in the road.”
Human Capital is the study of individuals and allows the federal government to determine the value or lack of value of each human being based upon gender, age, health, possibly religion, politics, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, and IQ or talents versus the lack of worth to the federal government and the cost to the government, i.e., an individuals cost for health care treatments, food, housing, and education. This is a Orwellian 1984 agenda. It represents a Nazi type of agenda with the intent of creating collectivism as well as a means of reducing the population and creating a Master Slave mentality. This is also the dream of creating the Master Race. Yet, the American people have been cheering on the Obama’s and the Clinton’s and support and defend their dream of a New World Order demanding every individual march to the drum beat and comply or else be punished.
Furthermore, past and current congressional members failed to perform their fiduciary duty as required by the 14th Amendment and their sworn oaths and job duties that require each member to read and study each law in-depth! They not only failed to study each law in-depth and assure the American people that each law, mandate, regulation, punishment, tax, and penalty are written in accordance with the US Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans and reflect the best interest of the American people. They failed or refused to read 2700 pages of laws, which in my opinion, appear to be a serious dereliction of duty. But, which public servant working in the taxpayer-funded federal government cares about the US Constitution? After all, it is the non-vetted President Obama who stated more than once that the U.S. Constitution is flawed and that it is “meaningless?” He stated, “The Constitution is a mere charter of negative [liberties] that need to be changed.”
Hypocrites! Too many members of the White House and Congress are hypocrites and they appear to be lawmakers who have turned into law breakers as they hold themselves above the laws which they mandate for the American people and exempt themselves from the laws. Laws are written for criminals as law-abiding citizens don’t violate the laws. Criminals exempt themselves from the law and hold themselves above the law, but law-abiding citizens follow the Rule of Law and public servants swear to uphold U.S. Constitutional law.
Should the American people not ask which constitutional authority is the White House and Congress applying that grants these public servants the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they mandate as constitutional law on U.S. soil, even though they admit that the laws are unread and possibly unconstitutional and illegal? After all, if they weren’t read, how would they know what’s in them when they rubber stamped them “approved.” Perhaps, it would have been wiser to rubber stamp Obamacare, “D.O.A.,” dead on arrival.
Consequently, it’s amazing to me that the American people haven’t bothered to ask how unread and unconstitutional laws can be legal on U.S. soil or how people can be punished on U.S. soil for failing to comply with unread or unconstitutional laws? The fact that they are unread should render them unconstitutional on their face! This problem should raise the question under which constitutional law is Obama and Congress applying that provides them the authority to write discriminatory constitutional laws and grants them the authority to exempt people who they favor or where there are huge conflicts of interest wuch as bundlers, donors, and supporters?
If Obamacare is such a great improvement to the healthcare industry then why would the Obama’s and Sebelius, Biden, and congressional members want to exempt themselves from complying with Obamacare? This problem begs the question if they realize that Page 107 of Obamacare includes making Americans slaves of the Muslim immigrants and refugees living in the USA by referring to Americans on this page as Dhimmis? If you don’t know what a Dhimmi is then you should read up because from my research it means “slave.” In other words, the American people must comply and pay up for their housing, food, and health care. Could this be one of the key reasons why Obama is so adamant about forcing Obamacare upon the American people?
Another key reason for Obamacare appears to be depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens and he approved of Infanticide of U.S. Natural Born Citizens while he was a senator which means babies that are born after abortion are left to die. In fact, senator Obama implemented the Global Poverty Act with the approval of Hillary Clinton, Biden, Feinstein, and Kerry, and others, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires that Americans pick up the tab to kill these babies with abortion scissors in the USA and around the world! This flies against the moral majority and Christians and Catholics who are being wiped out by terrorists around the world! This Global Poverty Act that Obama signed as an Executive Order about January 2009 diminished the constitutional Right-to-Life and it reflects a depopulation program similar to that of the U.N. Agenda 21.
Obamacare or the ACA or [un]Affordable Care Act is not so affordable. In fact, most people can’t afford to sign up or comply because he’s increased their Health Care Premiums by 40% to 100% depending upon the plan. It’s been reported in the news that about three million Americans are not without health care insurance because of Obamacare as their insurance companies cancelled their plans. In fact, Obamacare robs from Peter to pay Paul. Peter is Medicare and is being robbed by Obama to pay for Obamacare which diminished the services for seniors, veterans, disabled, and the very sick who rely on Medicare.
If Obamacare is such an outstanding and legal benefit being implemented as a national takeover of the healthcare industry by the federal government then why must the federal government mandate excessive taxation, excessive penalties, excessive punishment in violation of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits those excesses? If Obamacare is so wonderful then why are doctors retiring early and expressing their disdain for Obamacare? And, why are businesses closing down and laying off American employees or reducing their work hours which reduces productivity because of Obamacare? This will increase the cost of consumer products to Americans because businesses will be forced to pay higher premiums for their part-time employees including illegal citizens!
Justice Scalia questioned if Obama, who implemented the umbrella law known as ObamaCare, could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off base at all! After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat! And Mayor Bloomberg is pushing what and how much Americans can drink. And, Monsinto, oops, I mean Monsanto, is pushing GMO’s on the world and fighting against labeling their products. Michelle Obama is promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks. The Redistribution program which includes the snack and spy program is described in my latest political satire on how Obamacare and Redistribution of wealth could devastate a free Judeo-Christian Nation that leaves the reader with thought-provoking messages on these agendas and it’s titled, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs,Red Necks and Radicals” available at amazon.com
Therefore, Obama is selling snake oil to the American people. His health care is more about death care because his program includes death panels, euthanasia, enslavement to foreigners and donors, and depopulation through same-sex agendas and mandated abortions. His committee of 15 will determine who lives and who dies based upon their evaluation of each individual as human capital who will be no more than a commodity of value or little value to the federal government. As I stated, if Obamacare is such a wonderful health care program then Obama and Biden, Sebelius, senators Reid, Pelosi, and the entire Congress should be the first to sign up, and comply with their own laws, otherwise they are law breakers and holding themselves above the laws, which they mandate for everyone else, but are failing to follow the Rule of Law which they swore to do.
How then are the American people not rising up and demanding that Congress Repeal and stop the funding before the tsunami hits that is coming upon U.S. citizens in January 2014? How is it that Obama, Biden, and Congress are determined to destroy the greatest health care industry in the world and force Americans into the worst HMO system that they could ever imagine? Obama and his regime are forcing Americans to pay up front against their will for mandated abortions and death panels or else be punished? Isn’t that like paying for your own demise and the demise of your family, friends, unborn babies, and fellow Americans and helping make the U.S. Natural Born Citizen extinct? How is it that Americans can’t see this as a silent genocide without war or guns on what Obama and congress now refer to as a battlefield? Does it not appear that the federal government is at war with America and Americans?
Should the American citizens not ask why do we need a committee of 15 approved by Obama to determine if they will send Americans to early end of life counseling and pull the plug on grandma or the very sick or veterans? Is this program intended to save money for the federal government so foreign immigrants and illegals and Refugees can move into the USA and access food, housing, and Obamacare without paying up, because it will be paid on the backs of US taxpayers and create a nation of federal government works vs. a nation of citizens on entitlement programs dependent upon the federal government to take care of them since their focus has been on destroying jobs, not creating jobs!
Obviously, Americans will be mere chattel used as commodities and as “human capital” while Obama golf’s at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day to the U.S. taxpayers. The Obama Muslim Brotherhood and non-vetted czars and Congress will allow this committee of 15 to determine who will be euthanized, denied or rationed health care services based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government. Unless the law has been amended, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply and pay up front for Obamacare could spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty, so many will never get a monopoly card to get out of jail.
In fact, the federal government grants to themselves the right to raid and confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the federal government under Obamacare. Obama has enacted a NSA Massive Surveillance Program recently exposed by Whistleblower named Edward Snowden who most believe to be a U.S. hero. It’s my opinion that the massive set of Obamacare laws replaces the Constitution of the United States and denies Freedom, Liberty, and Rights.
Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare. So, why did I write the first blog in 2009 warning the nation and Congress – “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:
1. How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legallyand constitutionally moved forward to hear the unread 2700 pages without review, debate or congressional study prior to hitting the U.S. Supreme Court. Shockingly, the majority of Supreme Court Justices approved the unconstitutional ObamaCare and Justice Robert nailed the last nail into the coffin that would end the best health care system in the world.
Consequently, Justice Elena Kagan refused to Recuse herself from the Obamacare case even though there were documented reports related to her long time association with student Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama. After Harvard received a $20M donation from the Saudi Prince and Obama was named President of the Harvard Law Review, it’s reported that Kagan worked on a project to help create an Islamic Studies program at Harvard. Thereafter, it’s reported that Senator Obama appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and she worked on Obamacare and favored it and represented him in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thereafter, he appointed her as a U.S. Justice right before the Obamacare case was to be decided.
upreme Court while Solicitor General according to the records reported in the news. As a result, the majority of Americans requested that Justice Kagan remove herself from voting on Obamacare, but she refused and Justice Roberts refused to do so. There are many reports of the long time favorable association Kagan and Obama since he attended Harvard when she was Dean Kagan. In fact, the news posted a video that documented a special event when Dean Kagan held a special even for Senator Obama and she stated he was the most brilliant student to ever attend Harvard.
After Obama was elected as a non-vetted U.S. President, he appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him in an eligibility case while she was Solicitor General in the U.S. Supreme Court. which is considered unethical according to the Code of Ethics. Also, after Obama took office as an non-vetted U.S. President, Kagan worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General. Obama then nominated Kagan for the position of U.S. Justice. And, the Conflict of Interest is that these behaviors give the appearance of grave Conflicts of Interest as she was elevated thereafter to that of U.S. Justice right before Obamacare was to be voted upon. This behavior is similar to being a guest in Las Vegas by the CEO and Pit Boss of a luxurious casino. You put your money on the table, but the dice are stacked against you without your knowledge and you lose the shirt on your back. These issues casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court. It will take generations if at all possible to restore trust in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices.
2. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to “avoid” Article II of the U.S. Constitution? The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing . It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly non-vetted president who admits that his father is foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Great Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject. A U.S. Natural Born Citizen cannot have a foreign born parent even if born on U.S. soil for that makes him a “naturalized citizen,” but not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen.”
The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question and has been the resource used by congress for 237 years.
3. Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,700 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved? After all, it is the fiduciary duty required by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and their duty to the American people that the U.S. Congress read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before the laws are debated in the Supreme Court.
4. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?
5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?
6. Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy? How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress to approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign? How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?
7. Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya. So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?
8. Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law, but then how is it that they are writing laws which are on federal land, not located on the soil of the USA? Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?
9. Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earningsafter taxes –earnings are private property– so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings aka private property to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections which the government may or may not provide with complete immunity?
Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty. Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?” In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care. Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution, known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.
So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front money scheme for Obamacare be paid up-front into the government’s fund without accountability as they know nothing, see nothing, and hear nothing when they are caught at wrong doing, and stand on the 5th and refuse to answer the questions as to what happened to the money?
How does it not border on extortion when law-abiding Americans have an imaginary gun placed to their heads by government thugs telling them to pay-up-front with their own earnings, even if they don’t want the consumer product, because consumer products are paid with private property aka personal earnings then taxes are paid. Why are Americans being forced under the threat of fear or punishment to pay up for a consumer product they don’t want and may never receive as the government retains the right to deny or ration said services?
Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Social Security with the promise of saving the taxpayers money for retirement by forced taxation from personal earnings? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than collecting taxes for Medicare and after they divert the money from Medicare, they tell the taxpayers, too bad, we’re denying or cutting services to seniors? Could Obamacare become the a bigger Ponzi scheme than the Redistribution of Wealth? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than Patient Dumping at University Hospital for big profits and bonuses by the staff? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than the fraud of the Housing Crisis implemented by Congress and Bankers? Could Obamacare become a bigger Ponzi scheme than promising 350,000 infrastructure jobs in exchange for billions of dollars? Could Obamacare be a bigger Ponzi scheme than Solyndra whose bundler owner took the taxpayers money then gave himself and partner big bonuses and wages and bankrupted? Could Obamacare be the biggest Ponzi Scheme to make and create big taxes for depopulation programs and to create big profits for politicians, banksters, and Wall Street?
Is This THE KEY TO ENSLAVE US NATURAL BORN CITIZENS? Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into aprivate enterprise as a for-profit health care industryas well as acting as the federal government with the intent to control a private corporation known as the national health care industry is unconstitutional. So where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to take over private corporations on US soil since they operate on federal soil with “limited powers and are now acting as a dual government and free enterprise running private corporations for-profit and excessive taxes with punishment?
The the truth is that only public servants, military, and foreign immigrants, swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, but the U.S. Natural Born Citizens born to two legal American parents on U.S. soil, who are the only persons eligible to be a U.S. President aren’t required to swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution unless those person enter public service or the military or they are foreign immigrants granted US Naturalized citizenship. U.S. Natural Born Citizens Pledge Allegiance to the U.S. Flag, but that doesn’t protect them under U.S. Constitutional laws if they haven’t sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps, that’s the reason some judges state to U.S. Natural Born Citiznes in court that they have no constitutional rights.
Therefore, how is it that U.S. Natural Born Citizens aren’t swearing an oath by the age of 7 to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? So, if US Natural Born Citizens aren’t sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but public servants, military, and foreign immigrants do swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution, then how does that not leave the door open on U.S. soil for public servants to enslave and indefinitely detain U.S. Natural Born Citizens if they aren’t sworn to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution which establishes their guaranteed liberty, freedom and rights? If that’s not true then why are foreign immigrants required to swear an oath to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution in order to be guaranteed constitutional protections? Also, how can a federal entity operating on federal land outside of the USA, District of Columbia, which isn’t part of the United States of America, be mandating laws for the separate states in the USA since the federal government is a separate federal entity working on federal soil, granted “limited powers” known as the District of Columbia, which isn’t U.S. soil? Shouldn’t the District of Columbia become a State of the USA so they can operate as part of the USA, so now you know why the Framers granted them “Limited Powers.” Otherwise, a foreign entity known as the federal government working on federal land would stomp their Big Foot on individuals and individual state laws. Today, the federal government has trampled on “limited powers” and are lawless and have gone dictatorial rogue?
Furthermore, Obamacare will lead to collectivism. These laws will force citizens out of the suburbs into the cities where fewer people can be more easily controlled. These laws will reduce the income of the Middle Class U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and no doubt will devastate the quality of life and the quality of the current health care industry. So, should we not ask what is the difference between the mafia, who force people to hand over money against their will and who comply under fear and threat of losing their homes or businesses or be punished? Today, we have a non-vetted president who appears to be punish Americans and represented himself as a poor black kid with a white mother who is golfing at Martha’s Vineyard at $50,000 per day for rent and taking $100,000,000 vacations at taxpayer’s expense while denying services and jobs to Americans who pay his wages and pay up for his luxurious lifestyle! Americans are hurting for jobs and struggling to buy gas and food as costs increase, but reckless spending is ok? Has the US Congress and the American people lost their minds and all common sense and logic? It appears that We The People have forgotten that they are the government.
How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws of “limited powers?” If the federal government is taking over and running a private corporation, the health care industry, then shouldn’t the government be providing disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase with their personal earnings against their objections?
The Boards of Consumer Affairs require consumer disclosures, laws, policies, requirements, and regulations of consumer products sold to consumers prior to selling or providing consumer products so is the federal government above those laws, as well? Is the federal government operating as a national health care industry and obtaining business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses or Medical Malpractice Insurance? After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people! As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war or by guns, which is serious. Americans need to demand disclosure on their rights under Obamacare if they experience rationing or being denied services or prescriptions and their rights relating to any damages caused by such actions as well as the right to file lawsuits.
And, even more remarkableis the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, which Obamacare doesn’t favor be ordered to pay up front for services or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.
In fact, Eric Holder, stated, “Americans will be polarized. The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years. There will be no majority race in America.” Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Natural Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV, Due Process of Law, and replacing it with the NDAA Law? In my latest political satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,the dinosaurs are confronted with mandated abortions as the elders fight back knowing that mandated abortions will reduce their population. This keepsake exposes the dangers of Obamacare and Redistribution of America’s wealth to anti-American nations.
In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, Obamacare is discriminatory, unconstitutional, unread, and possibly illegal. Obamacare borders on laws mandated in tyrannical Third World nations by dictators who hold themselves above the law as they punish their citizens or cause their demise. Is there any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug on the street, who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else?’ Or a thug who says, “Hand over your money or else?” What if a car dealer told you, “You’re required to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all.” What’s the difference? (Note: This article may be shared but please do not remove content without giving credit to the writer and please don’t plagiarize the content, much appreciated.
LIKE – COMMENT – REBOG – FOLLOW – buttons on top and bottom and welcome
Follow Rose or Rose4Justice
Books: Fight Back Legal Abuse or Obamacare, Dinosaurs, RedNecks and Radicals, at amazon.com
You Tube – Rose4Justice or Rose Colombo
Radio : The Justice Club – google Freedomizer Radio – MWF 11am-12p (pdt) – 2-3p (est-usa) – Call or listen & speak out at (347) 324-3704
Radio: Constitutionally Speaking – Fridays, 4:30-6p (pdt) and 7:30p-9p (est-usa) – google Freedomizer Radio or listen online or ipods or Call & listen & speak out (347) 324-3704
Stumbleupon/Rose4Justice Pinterest Google+ Tumbler DIGG
Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational and entertainment purposes only. <a
written by Rose Colombo – original (c) pub. 12/28/2011, rev. 12/13/2013
Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution. It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.
Recently on CNN, the Intel Chairs, including Senator Feinstein, stated that America is less safe today than we were before 2009 or after 911. How is it that America is vulnerable to attack in 2013 when they had the opportunity to refuse to pay Iran $7B of US taxpayer money every year with knowledge that they are building possible nuclear weapons and that their former leader, Ahmadinejad and many other Muslim Brotherhood members or groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would wipe Western Civilization – America and Israel – off the face of the map?
The most alarming statement ever made during my life time, which should have rocked the nation, came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein, who said congress and the non-vetted President Obama implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows: “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.
How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government to be targeted anywhere around the world if “accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all “due process of law?” Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, “The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.” Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing words included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senators Graham and John McCain stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution?
Remember, Judge Napolitano stated, NDAA “shreds” the U.S. Constitution even though Obama and Congress swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen, not charge a citizen. Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military? So, has the 111th and 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without “due process of law,” there is no justice! There is only the possibility for tyranny and death or enslavement. The political satire recently released on amazon.com, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, alerts mankind to the dangers of Obamacare and the Redistribution of America’s wealth with fictional characters that parallel today’s Orwellian state of affairs.
Hear ye! Hear ye! All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story, along the lines of War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members – elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars, who voters and taxpayers believed as having the highest level of integrity and loyalty to the United States of America. America is a Republic and has been established as a Republic implemented by the Rule of Law, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, so let’s pray that the NDAA Law ends up to be no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible lack of communication, right? Unfortunately, it is real! I have posted videos online with a special guest and Patriot, Anthony J. Hilder,, who warned Americans back in the late 1990s, that there were people, who intended to imprison more Americans, especially Blacks, eventually use them for racial tension then as slaves in the prisons, but then again – it appears that any American can be a potential target today, since the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, Kill List using drones or whatever, and the foreign invasion of a majority of radical males, as well as the implementation of Obamacare that denies health care in most cases and mandates taxpayer funded abortions, death panels, mandated vaccines, micro-chips, and basically, death to Americans. And there is the Executive Order signed by President Bush in 2005 and Obama under his reign that wipes out the Constitution, Sovereignty, USA, and allows for the indefinite detention of all Americans should a President call out Civil Unrest or a Pandemic and Martial Law on U.S. soil which is totally unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, and outside of their job duties for which they are elected and taxpayer funded. It’s calle treason.
The NDAA law includes sections 1031 and 1032 and brings back memories of Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America” and failed to address himself as the President of the United States of America. Why would he do that? It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’ seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles. Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor by wiping out the Middle Class and creating a nation of the wealthy citizens and a nation of poor citizens. And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the “homeland” to be nothing more than a “battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as “enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” only and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law.” Or should we ask if the Obama regime are granting to themselves the authority to kidnap Americans on domestic or foreign soil without due process of law and without public scrutiny so that the persons kidnapped under the NDAA law would have no contact with the outside world? The usurping of the 4th Amendment, due process of law, by writing a new law to unconstitutionally by-pass due process of law, eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.
The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads: “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens. It does.”
Oh, no, it can’t can’t be possible for U.S. Congressional members to deny due process of law knowing it’s unconstitutional, right? We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right? Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and either laid down their lives or would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments, for which our U.S. laws are rooted, and the word of God expressed in the Bible, as well as the definition of our laws defined in the book, the “Law of Nations.”
Yes, it is true! Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA as stated by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.) on national television. The NDAA’s, sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter – did not include Americans – but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law. It’s alleged to have been passed without the congressional members knowing the law included Americans, but pressured by the non-vetted President Obama to include Americans, a very disturbing thought, indeed. Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein, McCain, Levin, and Graham as well as the mostly democratic congressional representatives, as well as Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 – and did not strike those unconstitutional sections – from the law titled NDAA-S.1867. The NDAA law, shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment, based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.”
Now is the time to demand to answers as to how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every citizen, legal or illegal, on U.S. soil as some people allege our government is under some sort of threat and are working allegedly under some sort of fear written by alternative writers. So, hasn’t the president and the Congress violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution? How is it that Senator Graham and Senator McCain as ell as other representatives declaring that the “world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war? Thus, they would have to declare war against the country they swore to protect! Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that “people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?” Also, how is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” – an ugly law titled, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of Sections 1031 and 1032). This should be worrisome to Americans considering the majority of Americans want a new “vetted” president, as they are watching the race card being played out, knowing that such actions could cause civil unrest.
Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”
As I state in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” that “without “Due Process of Law, Article, IV, there is nothing! There is nothing but tyranny!” Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people who are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law. It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”
Americans must write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, refuse to reveal the “charges.” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial,” and deny American citizens access to a civilian court guaranteed to U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law, while providing due process of law to captured Middle East foreign radicals of 911 and other attempted plots against America.
Again, Senator Feinstein stated that sections 1031 and 1032 are included targeting Americans for indefinite detention saying, “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.” Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard. So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief? But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power.
Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a U.S. soldier of a crime. Although, there are journalists stating that this law, Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today. In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases. Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, “So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.” He said, “Yes, they are still in effect.”
Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, “Don’t be
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.”
So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?” Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?
Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?” One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world. The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare. During WWII, the Nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being “extremists.” So, sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.
In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’ including the homeland.” How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” as Sections 1031 and 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government, who can be detained indefinitely, as “enemy combatants” and denied “due process of law?” It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from the NDAA Law and Sections 1031 and 1032 which they have dished out for the American people. After all, they shoved the unread Obamacare down the throats of Americans, who objected, while taking bribes for votes and making backroom deals, but didn’t feel it was good enough for Congress, so they exempted themselves holding themselves above the laws of the land they mandated. They wrote loopholes into the laws making “Insider Trading” legal for congressional members, but illegal for American citizens, who they send to jail and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal.
On the other hand, how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for law makers? It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office exempt themselves and hold themselves above the laws they mandate \and dish out for the American people.
On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then one must ponder who is America battling on a daily basis? It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!” Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who the U.S. federal government is battling or at war with if not Islam who attacked Americans on 911 and murdered Americans and continue to threaten Americans? In fact, there are radicals from Mexico and from the Middle East, who gained citizenship and swore to pledge allegiance to the U.S and the U.S. flag stand on U.S. soil and state that they will eliminate Western Civilization, democracy, and dominate America which is prohibited by U.S. Constitutional law, but Americans have been arrested for praying on public sidewalks including heterosexuals who are dancing or kissing in public. since 2009.
Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.” Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground. Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. I guess politicians can spin the laws in any direction that suits them, but not so for the American citizens. The NATO mission against Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the assassination of Gaddafi. The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried. It’s “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrannical leaders of Communist and Third World national. In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].”
Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of al-awalki, an converto to radical Islam, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.” But, he was denied “due process of law” and to the best of my knowledge, never charged with a crimes before he was taken out under Obama’s regime. Think about that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of any and all Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?” Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of lawand render Americans live on U.S. soil today without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant? One must ponder if a Tea Party member, or an Oathkeeper, or a Christian, Catholic, heterosexual, a Patriot, pro-Constitutional American, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-God, pro-right-to-life, and pro-Free Enterprise be targeted?
For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.”
Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally released after he was denied “due process of law” on U.S. soil as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.
David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and he could have been served with a subpoena orarrested, but instead American women, children, and men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration, except for the people who escaped. What crimes did the women and children and unborn babies commit, but even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil and a government becomes similar to a “mob rule.”
Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. The respected Constitutional Lawyer, Gerry Spence, stepped up to the plate in his defense.
Therefore, Americans must ask, “What happened to the Udall Bill that was proposed and would shred Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law?”
Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes. Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right? In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.
How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a “water boarding ” policy after 911. Should we not as – which is worse? Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and denying “due process of law that indefinitely detains any citizen – innocent or guilty – on U.S. soil? – or an implementing a “hit” list of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world based on an accusation only?
On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.” And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.” Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.
Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war on Libya? And, which nation is the “homeland” battling? We should ask under which authority is congress applying that provides congressional members the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny “due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032? ***(Thisarticle may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)
Rose Colombo, an Irwin Award winning writer,poet, and author whose been published around the world as a 5 Star Review. Colombo’s first shocking self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” published late 2010 on amazon reveals the truth about the illusion of justice and how easily anyone can be targeted by the government and their lives destroyed. The second book, a fictional political Orwellian satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” exposes the U.N.’ redistribution of health and wealth and begs the question if the dinosaurs were depopulated or made extinct.
Rose Colombo has been featured in “The Journal of Commerce and Science” worldwide magazine; The Veterans Reporter; The Daily Law Journal published for lawyers and judges; Orange County Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post, L.A. Times, Seal Beach Journal, and more….interviewed on major and local radio and TV and produced and hosted her own created cable TV and am-FM and online radio shows with prominent guests. She is currently on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice, and social media.
“Legal Gangsters??” (c) a title coined in 1991 by Rose Colombo – Rose permitted the use of her title for a newspaper article as a co-author published April 9, 1996 – She wrote this latest original article pub. (c) 11/20/2011 as follows:
Legal Abuse is not new! After Obama was elected as U.S. President without proper vetting, he and his supporters enacted a new definition of what is illegal for the people vs. what is illegal for congress. The new definition of illegal is titled “inversion!” What is illegal for the American people is legal for congress! This new congress that sees the constitution as “meaningless” for them have created a “them against us” society. They are holding themselves above the law and view themselves as royalty and the people as peasants who are nothing more than numbers, possibly to be depopulated under the U.N.’s Agenda 21 program; mandated abortions, gay indoctrination, euthanasia; rationing of health care services; radiation; and excessive laws which deny due process of law in some cases; a “hit” list, as well as, the illegal and indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, which is unconstitutional under our nation’s laws. Yet, the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice, as well as, the ABA Constitutional Lawyers continue to remain silent. These mandates, requirements, and laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution do not reflect the Constitution of the United States or federal job descriptions. They fly in the face of America’s Rule of Law in every way, shape or form. Every federal public servant, who remains silent and fails to perform their fiduciary job duty for which they are paid by the taxpayers, are guilty. A job and wages in exchange for public servants whose fiduciary duty it is to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is a legal binding contract according to the law. A job as a public servant does not include the authority to circumvent the constitution and rule by Executive Order. Executive Orders are not laws.
Every public servant should search their conscience and if they choose to abuse their power and deny constitutional rights to the citizens of the United States, then they are violating their fiduciary duty to their constituents in exchange for their jobs and taxpayer wages and therefore, should step down. How then shall we deal with those public servants who refuse to step down, but are in violation of their sworn oath and without conscience stonewall due process of law, while protecting their own? In fact, some lawyers and judges believe that they can trample on the constitution and establish a foreign law in our courtrooms. The enemy of a great nation is like a big fat yellow belly rattle snake with giant fangs, who lies dormant, still, and hidden away, but at a calculated moment, he strikes at his enemy and poisons his prey.
As a long time advocate for justice who has monitored the courts and helped people who ended up victims for years, documenting their cases and researching the law, I can tell you from first-hand experience that unless you’ve walked through the fires and tribulations, you cannot call yourself an “expert” or an “authority” on corruption or legal abuse. Talk show hosts may read the information provided by those who have been exposing injustices for years, but the experience and knowledge gained after 25 years of research only touches the surface of what happens to the victims without anywhere to go for help.
Ironically, I found myself intrigued by articles in the newspapers or Newsweek or Time Magazine during the 80s and 90s. One such article which caught my attention and stuck in my head was written by a reporter who said that the government was creating a “them against us society.” A most fascinating article hit a major news magazine about 1990 which stated that the law schools were graduating so many lawyers that it would create an over abundance of lawyers within ten years and there would be hungry lawyers looking for the same jobs. So, what was the remedy? Legislatures must create more laws so the general public will intentionally or unintentionally or through ignorance violate more laws and keep the “machine” in operation.
For example, perjury for the powerful is referred to as “a mistake.” Mismanagement of $10,000,000 of stimulus tax dollars promised for jobs but used for buying and selling guns for criminals is referred to as “negligence.” Insider Trading by congressional members or other public servants is referred to as a “legal.” The lawmakers who swear to uphold the Rule of Law boldly state that it is legal for congress to commit the crime of “insider trading” because they have provided themselves the authority to do so outside of the Rule of Law. They have used their positions to circumvent the constitution and expect the voters and taxpayers to believe they have the authority to hold themselves above the law and exempt themselves from the law, prosecution, lawsuits, or fines.
Therefore, I decided to include an excerpt from my Irwin Award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” featured in the Daily Law Journal, which reflects what is recurring in the executive and congressional and judicial branches of our government, as they hold themselves above U.S. Constitutional law, protect their own, rendering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights dead on arrival before you hit the courtroom!
An excerpt from “Fight Back Legal Abuse” (C) involving a true story of a former Treasury Agent assigned to Organized Crime Strike Force, Mr. George Wright, who believed that public servants and prominent people should be held to the same standard of the law, but found out the hard way that those in positions of power didn’t agree:
“The investigation was done for all the right reasons, but the system broke down…deciding that public attention would be the only way which the Wyoming case would be prosecuted, I again contacted the Los Angeles Times.” He says, “My decision was not an easy one, I had violated department regulations and knew the risks involved. He said, Our public officials and prominent business leaders should be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else. Crime is crime.”
“Wright was seeking justice, but instead, he says, “On a sweltering Friday, July 1, 1974, the supervisor of the Los Angeles Office of the U.S. Treasury Department called me into his office. He said, ‘Wright, Washington advises me to have you turn in your badge, gun, credit card and cash advance. You are relieved of your responsibilities here. Furthermore, Washington is considering prosecuting you on as of yet, undetermined charges.’ Wright said, “I wanted to remember my badge the way it was, not the distorted image it had become.” He says, On July 4th, 1974, while America celebrated its independence, I was being separated forever from government service because I’d done what I thought was right.” He said he wrote a resignation letter, but the government wouldn’t accept it and “I was told that the wording was not acceptable and that if it was not changed, I would be prosecuted.”
Wright asked, “What are the charges?” The man from Washington responded, “We are prepared to arrest you immediately on charges of treason, espionage, giving out confidential income tax information, selling diagrams of government installations to a foreign power.” And, then almost as if an afterthought, he added….”and the misdemeanor for giving information to the press without going through channels.”
Mr. Wright said, “If they arrested me, I’d have a criminal rap sheet and would spend the rest of my life explaining how I came to be arrested for treason and espionage. Not only would my career have been over, but my job prospects would never exceed folding napkins at a taco stand. I had no choice at all. Wiping away tears of sad frustration, the secretary slowly typed my second letter of resignation…..”
(This article may be shared, but no part of this article may be copied without the express permission of the publisher or author as stated under copyright laws in the book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse”). On the back cover of my book is a quote from a letter written to me from the Hon. Nancy Wieben Stock…..”and the truth shall set us free.” ** (This articlemay be shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party.)
Rose Colombo’s self-help Irwin Award Winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, and her latest political satire paralleling todays unconstitutional health care law, Obamacare, with fictional characters that reveal the Orwellian changes coming to America offer Free Reviews and Complimentary Pages at www.amazon.com
written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/19/2011
We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009. Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members between 2009 – 2011. The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.
Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit” list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government? It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens. If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law? A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!
Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008: “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies. It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members. There are hundreds of missing guns!
Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.” Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money. The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.
How is it that the Obama czars, the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and the Homeland Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?
We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley. We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation. More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.
Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.
The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:
1. 1992: Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.
2. 2000: Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits. She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign. She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.
3. March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.
4. March 25, 2004: SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)
5. July 29, 2005: S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing
6. September 2005: Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune
7. 2006: Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]
8. 2008: New York Times: “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].
9. October 20, 2008: Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”
10. March 13, 2009: Gun Ban List: HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.
11. L.A. Times 3/27/2009: “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”
Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”
“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”
12. March 2009: Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A. Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%]. They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.
13. March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.
14. May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.
15. August 14, 2009: CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1: “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”
16. August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2: Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.
17. June 28, 2010: The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”
18. July 20, 2010: The Examiner by Howard Portney read: “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”
Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest; or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?
19. May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.
20. June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’ Clinton said in an interview. “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”
21. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council. The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.
22. August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.
23. August 2010: Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights: She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.
24. August 2010: Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders: Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts. She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.
25. September 2, 2010: Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics. [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]
26. January 8, 2011: Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents. Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.
27. Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury. He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.
28. January 8, 2011: LiteNews.com – U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life. Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush. He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner. Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency. The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll. Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.
29. February 23, 2011 Letter: Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”
30. February 2011 Letter posted on-line: Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico. “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”
31. June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein: “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations. This administration routinely ignores subpoenas. The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.” .
32. May 23, 2011: CNN seen on You Tube video: Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks. [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)
33. 2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.
On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America. On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body. On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki. Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?” These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.
In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date, as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens. The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future. **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).
The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review. Read Reviews andcomplimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com
Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015
How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld? Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law. Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows: “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”
In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators. The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent. This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical lawmakers who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.” Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights, And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the Law of Nations.
Sharia Law states it is a Law. And, it is a foreign Law! The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period. It is called “Treason.” Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East. Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well. The experts on Sharia state that Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law. It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.
Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated. Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel. The U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from church and state and provides freedom of religion in America. In other words, Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately. Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization with Sharia Law. And, there lies a major difference. The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.
In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow. In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!
On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land. There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization. It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs. Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.
Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food, and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children. But, in America, a majority of U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches. Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level? Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization. We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!
For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil. Should we not ask if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans? If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization, then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported. Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely. In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.
In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare. It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty. In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill? If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped from their titles by We The People?
It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason. Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by. The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!
Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only? Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?
The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare. This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves! I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.
The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance. It’s their way or the highway! Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often. The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.
Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion! It states what it is – Sharia Law. A LAW! In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world. One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization. The radicals killed 3,000 Americans. They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration. They damaged the Pentagon. They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke. Many 911 witnesses who came forward and testified about what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind. Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.
Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East. They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims. They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books. The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.
Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.” Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not political “Laws,” but separate laws in America. Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time. Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization. And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment. The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food. Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.
The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:
In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” onemust understand their meaning and intent and purpose. The Law defines “Religion” as follows: “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”
Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation. If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.
The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ? And, why does a health care law include 2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts? Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans. It uses programs to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies. Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world. The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.
Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses. And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law. What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States? In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state. People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.
Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution. Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.
Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths? Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag. Again, Sharia Law states exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws. Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal? How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law! Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?
Treason: “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies. Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary. (Note: Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer. It’s unethical to ignore the laws of plagiarism)
If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated
Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows
Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding” with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com