Did Congress Declare the ‘Homeland’ and ‘World’ to be a “Battlefield,” if so, when did Congress Declare War? Obama said, “America is Not, and Never Will Be at War with Islam!”

Posted on by rose4justice
Obama declared America to be a "battlefield," not a Christian nation of peace!
Obama declared America to be a “battlefield,” not a Christian nation of peace!

written by Rose Colombo – original (c) pub.  12/28/2011, rev. 12/13/2013

Abraham Lincoln stated, “Don’t interfere with anything in the [U.S.] Constitution.  It must be maintained for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.

Recently on CNN, the Intel Chairs, including Senator Feinstein, stated that America is less safe today than we were before 2009 or after 911.  How is it that America is vulnerable to attack in 2013 when they had the opportunity to refuse to pay Iran $7B of US taxpayer money every year with knowledge that they are building possible nuclear weapons and that their former leader, Ahmadinejad and many other Muslim Brotherhood members or groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would wipe Western Civilization – America and Israel – off the face of the map?

The most alarming statement ever made during my life time, which should have rocked the nation, came from the lips of Senator Diane Feinstein, who said congress and the non-vetted  President Obama implemented sections 1031 and 1032, which is included into the NDAA-S.1867 law as follows:  “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of  American citizens without charge or trial.”  Although, some journalists say Americans are not included, my conversation with her staff member on Tuesday, March 28, 2011, said it is in effect currently unless and until it is voted upon and removed through legislation.

How then should Americans view their “homeland” and the “world,” perhaps as the new One World Order “battlefield” of “enemy combatants” subject to indefinite detention by the U.S. military, police, and federal government to be targeted anywhere around the world if “accused” of a crime, and thereafter, denied all “due process of law?”  Senator Lindsey Graham’s electrifying statement should have awakened the nation when he stated, “The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not.”  Although, Americans were assured that the NDAA law didn’t include Americans, Senator Feinstein’s disturbing words included into the NDAA-S.1867, known as sections 1031 and 1032, include American citizens as Senators Graham and John McCain stated on video. How is it that these senators and congress have granted themselves the authority to circumvent the U.S. Constitution? 

Remember, Judge Napolitano stated, NDAA “shreds” the U.S. Constitution even though Obama and Congress swore to uphold, defend, and preserve the constitution as well as protect the American people from anti-American enemies, but instead, they have targeted American citizens as the possible “enemy combatants” if the federal government or U.S. military should “accuse” a citizen,  not charge a citizen.  Doesn’t this open the door for tyranny and abuse on U.S. soil by the federal government and U.S. military?  So, has the 111th and 112th Congress shredded the entire U.S. Constitution, because without “due process of law,” there is no justice!  There is only the possibility for tyranny and death or enslavement.  The political satire recently released on amazon.com, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals, alerts mankind to the dangers of Obamacare and the Redistribution of  America’s wealth with fictional characters that parallel today’s Orwellian state of affairs.

 Hear ye!  Hear ye!  All patriots in America, but alas, this cannot be true, as this must be no more than a fictional story,  along the lines of  War of the Worlds, or perhaps, one of my favorite movies,Valkyrie, as such a statement could only cause one to believe that such a law passed by congressional members – elected temporary public servants paid with tax dollars, who voters and taxpayers  believed as having the highest level of  integrity and  loyalty to the United States of America.  America is a Republic and has been established as a Republic implemented by the Rule of Law, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, so let’s pray that the NDAA Law ends up to be no more than a mere figment of my imagination or one of my worst nightmares resulting in nothing more than a terrible lack of communication, right?   Unfortunately, it is real!   I have posted videos online with a special guest and Patriot, Anthony J. Hilder,, who warned Americans back in the late 1990s, that there were people, who intended to imprison more Americans,  especially Blacks, eventually use them for racial tension then as slaves in the prisons,  but then again – it appears that any American can be a potential target today, since the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, Kill List using drones or whatever, and the foreign invasion  of a majority of radical males, as well as the implementation of Obamacare that denies health care in most cases and mandates taxpayer funded abortions, death panels, mandated vaccines, micro-chips, and basically, death to Americans.  And there is the Executive Order signed by President Bush in 2005 and Obama under his reign that wipes out the Constitution, Sovereignty, USA, and allows for the indefinite detention of all Americans should a President call out Civil Unrest or a Pandemic and Martial Law on U.S. soil which is totally unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, and outside of their job duties for which they are elected and taxpayer funded. It’s calle treason.

The  NDAA law includes sections 1031 and 1032 and brings back memories of  Obama standing at the “wall” in Germany and stating, “People of the World” instead of addressing the “Citizens of America”  and failed to address himself as the President of the United States of America.  Why would he do that?   It does appear that the words “world” and “globalists’ seem to be the hot words for congressional members, public servants, and the elite, who support the U.N. and Agenda 21, and consider America as “oppressive,” even though it is America who they depend upon for their world charities and excessive lifestyles.  Is is possible that the members of the U.N. are pushing secretly to “redistribute” America’s wealth to Third World nations so Americans can be equally poor by wiping out the Middle Class and creating a nation of the wealthy citizens and a nation of  poor citizens.   And, if not, then how is it that congress and Obama have declared the  “homeland” to be nothing more than a “battlefield” whose citizens can be targeted as “enemy combatants” based on an “accusation” only  and punished with “indefinite detention” and denied “due process of law.”  Or should we ask if the Obama regime are granting to themselves the authority to kidnap Americans on domestic or foreign soil without due process of law and without public scrutiny so that the persons kidnapped under the NDAA law would have no contact with the outside world?  The usurping of the 4th Amendment, due process of law, by writing a new law to unconstitutionally by-pass due process of law, eliminates the third branch of government, the judiciary, as well as the need for judges or lawyers as the federal government and the U.S. military would be the accuser, judge, and jury.  

The ACLU published a statement in an article which reads:  “Don’t be confused by anyone claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens.  It does.”

Oh, no, it can’t can’t be possible for U.S. Congressional members to deny due process of law knowing it’s unconstitutional, right?   We, the free and proud Americans whisper, after all, our elected congressional members, those who speak amongst us when campaigning, who we call “honorable” based upon our belief of  their integrity, loyalty to their country and the American people, the Flag, the military, and most  importantly, the U.S. Constitution, once elected would never declare war against their “homeland” or against the “world” which is sheer madness, right?  Obviously, only a mad person would have such thoughts as the U.S. Constitution has been upheld, defended by those who shed their blood, and preserved the constitution with the utmost care by the most patriotic and loyal Americans who pledged their oaths and either laid down their lives or would lay down their lives for America’s freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the most “precious” and important document ever written, except for the Ten Commandments, for which our U.S. laws are rooted, and the word of God expressed in the Bible, as well as the definition of our laws defined in the book, the “Law of Nations.”

 Yes, it is true!  Sections 1031 and 1032, were included into NDAA as stated by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Ca.) on national television.  The NDAA’s, sections 1031 and 1032, which Senator Levin stated in a letter – did not include Americans – but it did include Americans when congress passed this unconstitutional law.  It’s alleged to have been passed without the congressional members knowing the law included Americans, but pressured by the non-vetted President Obama to include Americans, a very disturbing thought, indeed.  Surely, the American people are burning up the wires demanding to know why Senator Feinstein, McCain, Levin, and Graham as well as the mostly democratic congressional representatives, as well as Obama, signed and approved sections 1031 and 1032 – and did not strike those unconstitutional sections –  from the law titled  NDAA-S.1867.  The NDAA law, shreds “due process of law” and renders Americans vulnerable to indefinite detainment, based only on the federal government or U.S. military’s “accusations.” 

Now is the time to demand to answers as to  how and why congress and Obama shredded “due process of law” as established for the protection of every citizen, legal or illegal, on U.S. soil as some people allege our government is under some sort of threat and are working allegedly under some sort of fear written by alternative writers.  So, hasn’t the president and the Congress violated their sworn oaths and fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve the U.S. Constitution?  How is it that Senator Graham and Senator McCain as ell as other representatives  declaring that the “world” and the “homeland” is a “battlefield” since Congress hasn’t declared war?  Thus, they would have to declare war against the country they swore to protect!  Why did Rep. Lindsey Graham state that “people can be held without trial whether a citizen or not?”  Also, how is it that Obama signed a law during election year that targets Americans being arrested without “charge” or “trial” based on an “accusation” – an ugly law titled, the  National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA-S.1867 with the inclusion of  Sections 1031 and 1032). This should be worrisome to Americans considering the majority of Americans want a new “vetted” president, as they are watching the race card being played out, knowing that such actions could cause civil unrest.

Thus, Americans must demand to know under which constitutional authority and fiduciary duty congress is applying that provides congress with the authority to circumvent 235 years of established U.S. Constitutional law that guarantees”due process of law.”  

As I state in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” that “without “Due Process of Law, Article, IV, there is nothing!  There is nothing but tyranny!”  Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as required by law or the will of the majority of American people who are required components in the passage of laws. Laws passed must be just and fair and protect the American people, not target the American people and deny access to citizens seeking  justice. There is nothing just or fair about sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA-S.1867 law.  It should be quite disturbing to the American voters and taxpayers that congress and Obama would pass a law that provides the federal government the authority to by-pass the constitution and target American citizens as “enemy combatants,” on foreign or domestic soil, unless Congress has declared war on the “homeland” and the world” after labeling them as “battlefields” and all citizens as potential “enemy combatants.”  

Americans must write to congress and ask under which constitutional authority is congress applying that allows federal agents and the U.S. military to target American civilians as enemy combatants based on an accusation and strip American citizens of their constitutional rights, refuse to reveal the “charges.” or refuse access to a lawyer as well as a fair and just “trial,”  and deny American citizens  access to a civilian court guaranteed to  U.S. legal and Natural Born citizens, but allegedly denied under sections 1031 and 1032 of the  NDAA-S.1867 law, while providing due process of law to captured Middle East foreign radicals of 911 and other attempted plots against America.

Again, Senator Feinstein stated that sections 1031 and 1032 are included targeting Americans for indefinite detention saying,  “Congress is essentially authorizing the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charge or trial.”  Her statement should have shocked the nation as it rang out loud and clear, yet, some people don’t believe what they heard.  So, under which constitutional authority as elected public servants, who are paid with tax dollars to protect the American people and the U.S. Constitution, is Congress applying that provides them the constitutional authority to order the U.S. military to arrest civilians when the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide that the military follow the President of the United States, but the Commander-in-Chief?  But citizens are required to follow constitutional laws rendered by the congress approved by the President of the U.S., not the military, which in my opinion, is an abuse of power.

Ironically, even the U.S. military, provides for “due process of law” when they capture a foreign enemy or accuse a  U.S. soldier of a crime.  Although, there are journalists stating that this law,  Sections 1031 and 1032, doesn’t  include American citizens, Sections 1031 and 1032 are intact. Senator Feinstein and Graham made their voices quite clear that Americans are included, even if they remove those sections in the future, they remain intact today.  In fact, the denial of constitutional rights in courtrooms across this nation isn’t new, but for decades have been diminished in the media as “isolated” cases.  Unfortunately, most Americans have been blinded by the lack of truth in the media. So, early this morning, I phoned Senator Feinstein’s staff member and I asked if Sections 1031 and 1032 had been struck down as I was informed by a reporter, and I was told “no,” and that the law, sections 1031 and 1032 included into  the NDAA law are still “in effect” as of this date. So, I said, “So, Americans can be targeted and arrested as “enemy combatants without “charge” or “trial” until or unless Sections 1031 and 1032 are removed.”  He said, “Yes, they are still in effect.” 

Again, an important statement in an article published by the ACLU reads, “Don’t be
confused by anyone claiming that the “Indefinite Detention” legislation doesn’t apply to American citizens – it does.” 

So, what if the federal government secretly decided to target a race or an ethnic group or a grassroots group as their enemy and ordered their arrests without “charge” or without a “trial?”  Could any government under such a law have people removed from their homes and destroy their organizations or businesses by accusing people of crimes and arresting them without “due process” so they can create their utopia of rich and poor?

Americans should write or call their congressional members and ask, “When did Congress Declare War against America and the world as Rep. Lindsey Graham and Senator John McCain declared that the “homeland” and the “world” are a “battlefield?”  One should consider that in order to be an “enemy combatant” and live on a “battlefield,” one must be at war and at battle with the enemy, but I don’t see a war or a battle raging on U.S. soil or upon every nation throughout the world.  The danger of such a law is that the federal government determines who is an “enemy combatant” and who should be detained indefinitely without “charge” or “trial.” For example, the Obama administration called the Tea Party supporters “extremists” when they protested against Obamacare.  During WWII, the Nazis ripped people out of their homes and businesses – arrested people on the spot based upon an accusation of being “extremists.”  So,  sections 1031 and 1032, in my opinion, should be eliminated immediately.    

In an article published by the ACLU, it states that Rep. Lindsey Graham stated as follows: “section 1031, the statement of authority to detain, does not apply to American citizens….and designates the world as the ‘Battlefield’ including the homeland.”  How then does congress justify that Americans are not targets of their own government if America is declared a “battlefield” as Sections 1031 and 1032 includes Americans as potential targets of the government, who can be detained indefinitely, as “enemy combatants” and denied “due process of law?”  It would be wise to ask if Congress exempted themselves and their families from the NDAA Law and Sections 1031 and 1032 which they have dished out for the American people.  After all, they shoved the unread  Obamacare down the throats of Americans, who objected, while taking bribes for votes and making backroom deals, but didn’t feel it was good enough for Congress, so they exempted themselves holding themselves above the laws of the land they mandated.  They wrote loopholes into the laws making “Insider Trading”  legal for congressional members, but illegal for American citizens, who they send to jail and exempted themselves from punishment so they could commit the same crime and call it legal. 

On the other hand,  how can those in law enforcement remain silent about public servants writing loopholes into the laws so they can commit a crime and call it legal for law makers?  It does appear that much of the enforcement is only directed at the people, while those in public office exempt themselves and hold themselves above the laws they mandate \and  dish out for the American people.  

 On the other hand, if America is a “battlefield” then  one must ponder who is America battling on a daily basis?  It was Obama, who stated to the world, “America is not, and never will be at war with Islam!”  Bush and Obama, and McCain stated that Islam is a peaceful nation, therefore, why is America and the world declared “battlefields” if congress hasn’t declared who the U.S. federal government is  battling or at war with if not Islam who attacked Americans on 911 and murdered Americans and continue to threaten Americans?  In fact, there are radicals from Mexico and from the Middle East,  who gained citizenship and swore to pledge allegiance to the U.S and the U.S. flag stand on U.S. soil and state that they will eliminate Western Civilization, democracy, and dominate America which is prohibited by U.S. Constitutional law, but Americans have been arrested for praying on public sidewalks including heterosexuals who are dancing or kissing in public. since 2009.

Ironically, congress and Obama never Declared War on Libya, but attacked Libya by firing off 220 Tomahawks as well as ordered the assassination of Gaddafi which resulted in killing his grandkids, yet they refused to call the NATO attack a “war.”  Instead, Obama referred to the attack on Libya as a NATO “mission” and promised no boots on the ground.  Obama justified his decision by stating that “America is not at war with Libya and that the law passed during the Vietnam war does not apply because the U.S. engagement does not rise to the level of “hostilities” contemplated by law. I guess politicians can spin the laws in any direction that suits them, but not so for the American citizens.  The NATO mission against  Libya resulted in the killing of freedom fighters, civilians, and Gaddafi’s grandkids as well as the  assassination of Gaddafi.  The news reported that Gaddafi’s teenage son and his friends were also killed while having dinner at a restaurant. Remember, Gaddafi, didn’t threaten or attack the U.S. prior to the U.S. attacking Libya, and even if considered an enemy, under U.S. constitutional law, he should have been captured and tried.  It’s “due process of law” that sets America apart from the tyrannical leaders of Communist and Third World national.  In fact, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) stated on the congressional floor, “We are not declaring war at this point [against Libya].” 

Consequently, the American people didn’t pay much attention to the seriousness of the federal government ordering the assassination of al-awalki, an converto to radical Islam, who was an American citizen, and could have been captured by the federal government, arrested and tried in a court of law, since the Obama administration believed him to be an “enemy combatant.”  But, he was denied “due process of law” and to the best of my knowledge, never charged with a crimes before he was taken out under Obama’s regime. Think about  that – an American citizen was assassinated without “due process of law,” so can NDAA-S.1867 including sections 1031 and 1032 justify assassinations of any and all Americans labeled as “enemy combatants” since Al-Awaki was an assassinated American labeled as an “enemy combatant?”  Just how far does the 112th Congress intend to circumvent due process of law and render Americans  live on U.S. soil today without constitutional protections should the government accuse a citizen of being an enemy combatant?  One must ponder if a Tea Party member, or an Oathkeeper, or a Christian, Catholic, heterosexual, a Patriot, pro-Constitutional American, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-God, pro-right-to-life, and pro-Free Enterprise be targeted?

For example, Jose Padilla, an American citizen was arrested and indefinitely detained for 3 years and then allegedly without “charge” or “trial” sent to a Super Max prison for 17 years allegedly after being labeled as an “enemy combatant.” 

Richard Fine, Attorney, was allegedly indefinitely detained for about 2 years for exposing judicial corruption until he was finally released after he was  denied “due process of law” on U.S. soil as he pleaded for help on video seen on You Tube.

David Koresh, an American citizen, could have been arrested in town where the news reported he frequented and he could have been served with a subpoena or arrested, but instead American women, children, and men were burned alive by our federal government under the Clinton and Janet Reno administration, except for the people who escaped.  What crimes did the women and children and unborn babies commit, but  even if they were accused of a crime, it can be very dangerous for citizens or even deadly when “due process of law” is denied on U.S. soil and a government becomes similar to a “mob rule.”

Randy Weaver, an American citizen, was at home and allegedly he wasn’t served with a subpoena or arrested, but the federal government surrounded his property and killed his wife holding a baby on the front porch and his little boy and his dog running through the forests which hit national news while Clinton and Janet Reno were in office, who allegedly viewed them, as enemies of the government. The respected Constitutional Lawyer, Gerry Spence, stepped up to the plate in his defense.

Therefore, Americans must ask, “What happened to the Udall Bill that was proposed and would shred Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA law?”

Ironically, on March 13, 2009, Obama announced that it would no longer refer to prisoners at GITMO as “enemy combatants” but also asserted that the [U.S.] president has the authority to detain terrorist suspects there without criminal charges….and his administration began deciding which detainees are eligible for trial in a military tribunal or civilian court. Surely, if the government were to target the Tea party or other grassroots political groups, many Americans could be arrested indefinitely to fill the secret prisons beds if sections 1031 and 1032 aren’t removed from the NDAA law. For example, McCain said people could be accused if they have missing fingers or if they store more than 7 or 8 days of food in their homes.  Well, that would target most Americans as “enemy combatants,” right?  In fact, there was a HLS Directive that stated that in an emergency, people who were targeted as “extremists” could be detained allegedly without due process of law.

How is it that when Obama took office, he verbally accused President Bush of allowing foreign enemy combatants dunked by a “water boarding ” policy after 911.  Should we not as – which is worse?  Water Boarding or Shredding the U.S. Constitution and  denying “due process of law that indefinitely detains any citizen – innocent or guilty – on U.S. soil? – or an implementing a “hit” list of U.S. citizens anywhere in the world based on an accusation only?

On March 21, 2011, Rep. Kucinich stated that Obama “crossed the line” calling the attack on Libya an indisputable “impeachment offense.”  And, Senator Richard Lugar (Ind) who is the top representative on Foreign Relations Committee also said, “We are not declaring war at this point, we’ve already fired off 110 missiles, tomahawks, at Libya and had some aircraft support…but my point this week publicly has been that if we were going to war with Libya we ought to have a Declaration of War by the Congress.”  Well, there was no Declaration of War by Congress.

Ironically, in 2007, Obama stated, “The President does not have the power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”  So, again, I ask the question, “When did Congress declare war on Libya?  And, which nation is the “homeland” battling?  We should ask under which  authority is congress applying that provides congressional members the authority to target American citizens as “enemy combatants” and deny “due process of law” under sections 1031 and 1032?  ***(This article may be shared but not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, an Irwin Award winning writer,poet, and author whose been published around the world as a 5 Star Review.  Colombo’s first shocking self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” published late 2010 on amazon reveals the truth about the illusion of justice and how easily anyone can be targeted by the government and their lives destroyed.  The second book, a fictional political Orwellian satire, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” exposes the U.N.’ redistribution of health and wealth and begs the question if the dinosaurs were depopulated or made extinct.

Rose Colombo has been featured in “The Journal of Commerce and Science” worldwide magazine; The Veterans Reporter; The Daily Law Journal published for lawyers and judges; Orange County Register, Boston Globe, Denver Post, L.A. Times, Seal Beach Journal, and more….interviewed on major and local radio and TV and produced and hosted her own created cable TV and am-FM and online radio shows with prominent guests.  She is currently on Facebook and Twitter@Rose4Justice, and social media.

Colombo’s website:    www.colombochronicles.com

Blogs:  www.rose4justice.com

 

 

“Insider Trading” and Double Standards! Is Wall Street in Bed with the White House? Why is it illegal for Martha, but Legal for Pelosi?

Posted on by rose4justice
Irwin Award Winner self-help: Fight Back Legal Abuse
Irwin Award Winner self-help: Fight Back Legal Abuse

written by Rose Colombo, original l(c) pub. 11/16/2011

Occupy Wall Street made a statement whether people agree or not, at least they protested the long arm reaching from the White House into Wall Street and Wall Street reaching into the White House.  In fact,  the majority of citizens don’t believe they have the power to change the winds that have been shifting in an ugly direction as the federal government is trampling on the constitution and the “limited power” that is established by constitutional law.  Americans need to unite against the double standards that have been secretly implemented by past and current congressional members who are filling their bank accounts on the taxpayer’s time and dime!

How many Americans have looked up the definition of “Insider Trading?”  Are you aware that insider trading is illegal and that the Department of Justice went after “Martha” who made a pittance on her investment in comparison to former Speaker Pelosi, so how is that?

Insider Trading is:  “The use of material, non-public information in trading the shares of a company by a corporate insider or other person who owes a “fiduciary duty” to the company.”  How is it that the U.S. Congress no longer believes that they have a “fiduciary duty” to the American people as well as to the corporations who are seeking the approval or denial of bills before the U.S. Congress?

Furthermore, “This is the classic definition.  The Supreme Court has also approved a broader definition known as the “misappropriation theory;” the deceitful acquisition and misuse of information that property belongs to persons to whom one owes a duty.”

Obviously, members of congress are provided confidential information which could enhance their financial wealth outside of their job description if they choose to abuse their power on taxpayer’s time and work on personal “insider trading” on the job.  Americans don’t pay public servants to work on their personal Wall Street portfolios, but pay them to protect the public from unethical laws.  Federal employees are paid by the taxpayers to review corporate laws for approval or denial and determine if it is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congress as they withhold or deny or approve corporate laws presented to them for a vote based on insider trade secrets.  How is it not considered a Conflict of Interest or misappropriation as well as deceitful and unethical for congressional members to work on personal “insider trade” secrets for  personal financial gain while working as  federal employees working on the clock and paid with taxpayer dollars?  If congressional members feel it is ethical to use confidential information seeking insider trade secrets on the job than they should clock out!

On its face, it would appear that the Judicial Ethics Committee would be reviewing the Conflict of Interest, as well as the “misappropriation theory” and “deceitful acquisition or “misuse” of information which was intended for the purposes of ensuring the people were protected from big corporations on Wall Street.  So, this would explain why the American people are concerned about the U.S. Congress and Executive Office climbing in bed with Wall Street as the people line the streets protesting the double standards.

Last week, the senate voted to deny the American people the right to exercise freedom of speech on the internet by passing a bill titled “Net Neutrality.”  It is my suggestion that the American people and media wake up, because “Net Neutrality” circumvents the First Amendment and could devastate careers and corporations who promote themselves on the internet. This is a very dangerous attack against Freedom of Speech by the Obama administration.  Such a law could target people who protest against corruption between the White House and Wall Street.

Fortunately, CBS exposed a third big scandal related to the Obama administration and Congress. The U.S. Congress, past and current, passed laws stating that “insider trading” is illegal, but with deceit and non-disclosure, Congress created a double standard for congressional members making “insider trading” for congressional members legal.  Congress has written laws that circumvent the laws established for the American people by writing self-serving laws which exempt themselves from complying with the established laws mandated for all citizens and self-protecting laws which prohibit them from being prosecuted for “insider trading.”  In other words, what they implemented as “illegal” insider trading for all other citizens is “legal” for congress.

How is it legal and ethical for congressional members to re-write laws which circumvent the laws of the land, while simultaneously abusing their positions of power to write laws that allow them to violate the law with immunity, while on the job and racking up wages paid by the U.S. taxpayers?  The American people were led to believe that they voted for congressional representatives who would review corporate documents and determine what is in the best interest of the American people, not in the best interest of congressional members on taxpayer’s dime!

Under which congressional authority and fiduciary duty or job description is it that allows congress to circumvent the constitution by writing self-serving laws that protect them from complying with laws and from punishment, so they can fill their bank accounts, by creating double standards which favor congress?

So, how does congress justify their “insider trading” on the job for their personal financial gain when they are paid to protect the people from criminals who are arrested for insider trading?”  For example, a bank clerk wouldn’t be allowed to study the customer’s portfolios and discuss insider trade secrets on the job without being fired, yet there are congressional members using their time on the job paid by taxpayers for personal financial gain.

Which constitutional law or fiduciary job description did Rep. Pelosi apply that justifies her using confidential information which is the property of the government as personal information which in my opinion is unethical with the intent of using the “insider trading” secrets for her personal financial gain?  How is it okay for any employee to use information that belongs to the government or to a corporation for personal use?  In the private sector, employees would be fired.

Is it ethical for congress and the executive office to write self-serving, self-regulatory, and self-protecting laws for self-gain that provides them exemptions from compliance and exemption from punishment after mandating that all other citizens must comply with the laws which they mandate or else be punished such as  “insider trading” and “Obama care?”

Which constitutional amendment or the federal job description provides congress the authority to write approve, and enforce “insider trading” as illegal for the American people, but “legal for congressional members?

Consequently, I have determined that some congressional members believe that they have the authority to abuse their positions of power, even if it involves ethics violations and conflicts of interest to provide themselves immunity when they use “insider trading” secrets for financial gain by deeming “insider trading” as “illegal” for the citizens, but “legal” for congressional members who commit the same white-collar crime without fear of being  punished.

In conclusion, as long as the American people remain passive and accept that lawmakers can become law breakers by re-writing laws, manipulating the law, changing laws that are self-protecting from compliance and prosecution, the American people will be faced with double standards, unconstitutional laws, and a constitution that their leaders believe the words of Obama when he stated in 2001 and 2008 that the constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] that is “meaningless.”    **( This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Rose Colombo, is the producer and host of  former cable TV and talk radio show, “Issues of the Day.”  She’s been seen and or heard on radio and TV and red in major and local newspapers.  Read Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her 2 books, Irwin Award Winner, self-help book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire depicting fictional characters with an Orwellian story paralleling today’s corrupted political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals,” at www.amazon.com

Follow Rose on Twitter: Rose4Justce or visit her webiste at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Grievance: DOJ Tracking Law Abiding Americans, but Not Cartel Members using U.S. Recovery Fund: “Hit” Lists: Missing Guns?!!

Posted on by rose4justice
Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!
Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!

written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub.  10/19/2011

We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009.  Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members  between 2009 – 2011.  The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.

Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit”  list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government?  It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens.  If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law?  A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!

Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008:  “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies.  It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members.  There are hundreds of missing guns!

Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the  American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.”  Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money.  The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.

How is it that the Obama czars,  the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,  and the Homeland  Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?

We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley.  We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation.  More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.

Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into  Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.

The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:

1.  1992:  Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.

2.  2000:  Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits.  She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign.  She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.

3.  March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.

4.  March 25, 2004:  SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)

5.  July 29, 2005:  S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing

6.  September 2005:  Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune

7.  2006:  Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the  BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]

8.  2008:  New York Times:  “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].

9. October 20, 2008:  Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

10.  March 13, 2009:  Gun Ban List:  HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.

11.  L.A. Times 3/27/2009:  “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”

Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”

“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”

12.   March 2009:  Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A.  Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%].  They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.

13.  March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.

14.  May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.

15.  August 14, 2009:  CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1:  “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”

16.  August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2:  Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.

17.  June 28, 2010:  The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”

18.  July 20, 2010:  The Examiner by Howard Portney read:  “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”

Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest;  or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?

19.  May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.

20.  June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’  Clinton said in an interview.  “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”

21.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council.  The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.

22.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.

23.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights:  She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.

24.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders:  Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts.  She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.

25.  September 2, 2010:  Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics.  [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]

26.  January 8, 2011:  Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents.  Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.

27.  Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury.  He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.

28.  January 8, 2011:  LiteNews.com –  U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life.  Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush.  He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner.  Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been  postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency.  The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll.  Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.

29. February 23, 2011 Letter:  Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”

30.   February 2011 Letter posted on-line:  Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico.  “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”

31.  June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein:  “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations.  This administration routinely ignores subpoenas.  The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.”  [2009].

32.  May 23, 2011:  CNN seen on You Tube video:  Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks.  [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)

33.  2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.

On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America.  On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body.  On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki.  Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?”  These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.

In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date,  as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens.  The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future.  **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).

The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review.  Read Reviews and complimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

Can Americans Be Placed On Govt “Hit” List? Isn’t that A Conspiracy to Commit Murder By Denying Due Process of Law? What’s the Difference?

Posted on by rose4justice

By Rose Colombo, original (c) pub. 10/13/2011, Rev. 4/7/2012, 2017

Hooray for Hollywood!  Liberal Democrats gathered support for the unvested president Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, who promised to bring “change” to America.  At a Hollywood event, Obama stated to the audience that he was going to attack them with drones and they laughed.  He said, “You think I’m joking.”  Well, I never think he’s joking!  And the audience continued to laugh and applaud.  Today, Americans are faced with a unvested president who allegedly holds himself above congressional and constitutional law and seems to ignore our democratic process.  America is a  Republic which is operated according to  the Rule of Law.

Furthermore, the  news reported Obama is appointing a panel to create a secret “kill list” of  U.S. Citizens, who could be murdered by assassination, based on Obama’s accusation only or his non-vetted Czars and possibly his Muslim Brotherhood appointees.  They could accuse Americans living on  foreign or domestic soil.  U.S. Citizens could be accused of being “dangerous” or  “right-wing extremists” which is based upon political and religious affiliations, activism, and published writings or accused of being a  dissident. In other words, Americans will be denied their U.S. Constitutional rights to exercise “due process of law” guaranteed by the 4th Amendment.  Guilty as charged even if innocent!  Isn’t that how tyrannical dictators and communist dictators operate by punishing people who oppose their government’s laws, mandates, and regulations?  Compliance vs. non-Compliance?  So, if a secret “kill” list is enacted allowing the executive branch to target Americans for assassination without due process of law, would that include witnesses and whistleblowers who would testify against the government?

Remember, that the NDAA law reflects the tyrannical laws inflicted upon citizens of  Third World nations ruled by a tyrannical leader with an iron fist, not constitutional laws.  In other words,  Congress has created a new law titled NDAA which shreds due process of law equally important with Article II, but under NDAA, due process of law is the most important law inserted into the U.S. Constitution for it is the only law that prevents tyranny and genocide.  Is everyone in Hollywood still laughing?  In fact, the news reported  most recently,  Homeland Security has been instructed to fly drones over America and spy on the American people!

Although, the president’s Executive Order allegedly provides himself with the unprecedented authority to pick and choose which Americans on foreign or U.S. soil will be accused and labeled killed or assassinated, the U.S. Congress, who is the only body that can make and approve laws, is silent!  They are allowing the nation to be run by excessive Executive Orders without congress exercising the fiduciary duty and upholding the 14th Amendment as required by law.  In fact, the 112th Congress led by senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham implemented the NDAA law that targets Americans for assassination and indefinite detentions through Congress which shocked the American taxpayers!  Yet, congress exempts themselves from unconstitutional and unread laws since 2009.

Recently, the news reported that Obama ordered a “hit” on an American citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki  who the government reported dead, but the government also stated that they didn’t retrieve the body, but how is it they didn’t retrieve the body for positive identification?  Although, al-Awlaki converted to the Muslim faith and spoke out heatedly against American policies, there weren’t any criminal charges filed against him by the U.S. government.  He wasn’t armed or captured and he wasn’t provided due process of law, although he allegedly had been reported to have visited the Pentagon without incident where he could have been arrested.   Shockingly, al-Awlaki’s assassination and his minor child’s assassination occurred prior to the approval of the NDAA Law.  Shouldn’t this beg the question which constitutional authority Obama and his administration used to provide the executive office with  authority to write an Executive Order granting a U.S. President the right to assassinate any  American accused as an enemy of the government even if they could be captured?   Yet, al-Awlaki’s killing and that of his minor child, were ordered before the NDAA Law was enacted and while due process of law  was intact.  In fact, the NDAA law circumvents constitutional law.

Therefore, which constitutional authority was applied that provided the executive branch to by-pass due process of law and the judicial branch and order “hits” on  American adult and an American minor child and how is the NDAA Law in the best interest of the majority of the American people?  The NDAA law defies due process of law guaranteed by  U.S. Constitution.  Also, the anti-war.com blog is an article that states “Obama has Gaddafi’s 16-year-old son, friends killed at dinner,” but this information is very difficult to find in main stream news as many articles and videos are being made unavailable for public scrutiny.

Also, Obama is named in a myriad of eligibility lawsuits filed by attorneys, i.e., Philip J. Berg, esq., and Orly Taitz, esq.,  as well as other prominent lawyers and military officers, and Sheriffs alleging that there are numerous computer experts alleging Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries. The news reported that FBI complaints have been filed by computer experts.  Ironically, Obama  has allegations filed against him with the courts and FBI, yet he was allowed to order a “hit” on al-Awlaki and his minor child, who didn’t have any criminal charges filed against them at the time Obama ordered the assassination of  unarmed American citizens versus ordering their capture.  So, why is Congress remaining silent on the NDAA law that targets Americans based on accusation only, which opens the door to legal abuse and possibly wrongful murders?

  • Americans should be demanding to know why congress is silently allowing  Obama to rule the nation by Executive Order through excesses of  mandates and  requirements, excessive regulations, excessive taxation, unconstitutional punishment and excessive penalties making the Middle Class poorer while Obama approves in excess of $1 billion in U.S. tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood with knowledge that their stated strategic goal is to wipe out Israel and Western civilization,  Executive Orders were not intended to be used and abused so one man could rule the United States of America without congressional or constitutional authority and redistribute the wealth to foreign ant-American nations.  The congress and DOJ are trampling on the Rule of  Checks and Balances.  Americans are witnessing all three branches of government morphing into one branch of government.  The Obama Nation!
  • Congress  allowed a non-vetted man with a foreign-born father and Subject of Britain to grant himself absolute power by writing and approving a myriad of Executive Orders from day one after taking office, but under which constitutional or state law is it that provides a public servant the legal right to conceal his identity and credentials from all branches of the federal government and the government, We The People ?  President Obama approves excessive Executive Order and by-passes congress and usurps constitutional authority.
  • Obama  declared  his excessive Executive Orders as the new laws of the land.  Obama and congress usurped due process of law by approving the NDAA Law as well as approving an extension of the Patriot Act.  Due Process of Law is the only constitutional law established for the prevention of tyranny and  genocide.  In fact, Obama’s excessive signing of Executive Orders  caused congressional members, Dan Lundgren and Ron Paul to state on the record, on the congressional floor ,that Executive Orders are not laws.  The only reason that Congress is silent, in my opinion, is that they approve of Obama’s usurping the congress and constitution by Executive Order or else they would exercise their authority and Repeal and Defund.

Well then, how is it possible for a non-vetted  president to use tax dollars without congressional approval and appoint a panel of federal government non-vetted Czars paid by U.S. taxpayers to create a “hit list” that’s intended to murder Americans by  assassination without Due Process of Law as well as eliminate due process of law from  the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees U.S. Natural Born and long time generational legal citizens the right to access their Miranda Rights, and a lawyer.  Yet, the Obama administration and USAG, Eric Holder insist that the Muslim Radicals involved in 911 or other criminal acts be read Miranda Rights and provided Due Process of Law.  On the other hand, U.S. Natural Born Citizens if accused of being an enemy combatant are denied their constitutional rights to exercise Due Process of Law by implementing the NDAA law as well as the Patriot Act.

In other words, the NDAA law prohibits Americans accused by the U.S. government of being an enemy combatant from accessing charges filed, a lawyer, a trial or appeals as reported in the news by Senator Feinstein.  In other words, if U.S Natural Born Citizens are accused of being a “dissident,” they could accused and  punished and left to rot in a jail cell.

Therefore, Americans must ask under which constitutional authority and fiduciary job duty is the 112th Congress or Obama applying that provides them the authority to shred due process of law and implement the NDAA law.  The NDAA law or Patriot Act isn’t in the best interest of the American people, but could result in their demise or punishment.  It’s crucial that U.S. citizens who are the taxpayers  peacefully resist and denounce the federal government using U.S. tax dollars to implement the assassination of American citizens, unarmed Americans, who could be accused of being an enemy combatant on U.S. or foreign soil.  So, are Americans being forced to pick up the tab for the Muslim Brotherhood to continue their stated strategic goals against Western Civilization. Are Americans being forced to  pay for the possibility of their own assassinations and indefinite detentions if targeted by the Obama regime? Even more amazing is that Americans are paying the wages to employ the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House!  How is this possible?

Remarkable as it is – Americans and Brits are losing their constitutional freedom and liberty.  Actually, I read that the lineage of British royalty is tied to Germany and that several members of  British royalty married Germans and embraced the nazis.  The articles read that British Royalty changed their German names to English surnames during WWII as the English people intensely opposed the Nazi’s.

So, it shouldn’t surprise the Brits if they do their homework to realize  how their government may have been infiltrated subtly with public servants who oppose freedom and liberty.  Most recently, Obama toasted his allegiance to the queen which hit international news.  He obviously upset the Queen as she scolded him and stopped him, realizing that his allegiance is supposed to be to the United States of America,  but then he is a British Subject. He admits that his father comes from a long line of Muslims and his dad, Barack Obama was born as an African in Kenya and  Kenya was a Colony of Britain making Obama sr. a Subject of  Britain meaning Obama inherited his fathers birthright at birth in 1961 as a Subject of Britain under the  British Nationality Act of 1948; thus, Obama did not inherit a U.S. Natural Born Citizen birthright from his foreign-born father, but a foreign-born birthright.  And, being a African from Kenya and a British subject does not tie him to the civil rights movement of the Black Americans, who were slaves, and known as non-persons until they were freed.

Therefore,  how is it that a U.S. President and a U.S. Congress could even consider establishing laws that usurp “due process of law” for the American citizens who elected them and pay their taxpayer funded wages which is contrary to their sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution.  How is it that they’re OK with compiling secret “kill” lists of Americans based upon accusation only who may be 100% innocent to be killed on domestic or foreign soil including minor children?  Are Americans being used as sacrifices for political or religious reasons? 

Furthermore  a “hit” list refers to murdering people by assassination, the word murder is switched to read “assassination” because it has a connotation that the person is a criminal who is being murdered without due process of law, but based upon accusation only. Just the fact that the U.S. Congress and Department of Justice would even consider “hit lists” and assassinations and shredding of the U.S. Constitution is evil, immoral, unconstitutional, and disgraceful in the United States of America!  Our Forefathers must be turning over in their graves.

How then shall we refer to the Obama assassination “hit” list?  Will  Obama and his panel  decide who shall be murdered by assassination based on an accusation only?  Isn’t denying due process of law  what the Communist Chinese do to their citizens? Nope, Obama and Congress didn’t agree to an assassination list targeted at  foreign enemy nations or countries such as Kenya or Afghanistan, Iran, or China, Syria, Libya, Iraq or South  Korea, and so forth, but they’re targeting American citizens, who pay Obama’s wages of $400,000 per year, as well, as pick up the unlimited tab for his excessive $100,000,000  vacations.

How is it American’s aren’t asking how is it logical for  the federal government to implement an unconstitutional program and create a “hit” list that targets American citizens as potential enemies and place their names on “hit lists” for assassination, while exempting foreigners, foreign immigrants, refugees, and illegals?  Is the U.S. federal government trampling on their “limited” powers while stepping on the U.S. Constitution with their “Big Foot” and creating a new business using U.S. tax dollars for programs which might be viewed as “guns for hire” making U.S. Natural Born Citizens a commodity for profit by “hit” men?  After all, the DOJ under Obama’s watch used U.S. Stimulus tax dollars to purchase U.S. untracked guns and sell them to untracked cartel members  in Mexico!  It seems that Obama’s programs always create fear and increase taxes because he leads people to believe that he must  save the nation by creating more national debt!  In 2008, his Chicken Little speech, “The sky is falling” – actually worked. Well, President Bush left a national debt headed upwards of one trillion dollars, but Obama spent $5 Trillion in 2 1/2 years!

Some people may say, “Yes, but some times, really bad people should be murdered so this way, we can just get rid of them.”

The Rule of Law  is established for a reason.  Innocent people are murdered and die from time to time by law enforcement, but officers are held accountable, so people are protected from wrongful deaths.  But under the NDAA Law, is it legal for the non-vetted  president and his non-vetted czars to target Americans without recourse?

The Nazis started off with one name on their “hit” list.  And, after the first “hit” was completed and the people said nothing, they went onto the second name on the list and the people said nothing.  Afterwards, it became easier and easier until millions were dragged out of their homes by gun point (which has happened on US soil) and murdered the people who were too frightened to speak out as the army grew bigger and bolder and more insensitive to murdering people.  So, Hitler was emboldened as he was unopposed. He created his National Civilian Security Force and they marched into each city and forced their way into the privacy of the citizen’s homes and dragged them into the street and either executed them or enslaved them into concentration camps because they were good people who did nothing to stop them when the writing was on the wall.

In 2001 and 2008, Obama stated that congressional and constitutional authority is “meaningless.”  Think about that!  Why would a U.S. President boldly state that the U.S. constitution is “meaningless” after swearing an oath to uphold the constitution?  He said, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than a “mere charter of negative laws [liberties} that need to be changed” in 2001, 2008 and 2012, but those videos and articles are probably scrubbed from the internet as well.

Of course, people may ask, “Who cares?”  He says he’s an American and said that he was born in Hawaii and that’s good enough for me.”  Well, then why isn’t it good enough for all illegals just to say that they were born in the United States?  The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen must be adhered to so a foreigner can’t usurp the presidency and insert foreign laws, foreign history into U.S. history books, and foreign religions that force Americans to comply or else be punished on U.S. soil!  This is how anti-American foreign enemies change and transform a nation into their nation while the people sleep, they conspire.

Remember, “Every congressional member and public servant pledges their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, not to a public servant.  But, today, the congress, senate, and judiciary appear to be more concerned with protecting public servants from the Constitution than protecting the Constitution from public servants.” (C) 1989

You may say, “But,  public servants can’t assassinate American citizens or throw them into prisons without due process of law in America.”

Of course, many people ask, “Who cares if Obama or Panetta ordered the murder by assassination of a war criminal whose name is Osama bin Laden?”  He was  the mastermind behind murdering 3,000 Americans on 911, so who cares about due process of law?  In other words, those people believe in a barbaric lynch mob and mob rule, but it is “Due Process of Law,  which sets America apart from the rest of the world.

(Yet, has anyone asked how many people, victims, whistleblowers and witnesses, or First Responders have died because of 911 between 9/11/01 and 2013?)

But, I tell you that the Rule of Law should not be violated unless you don’t care that you or your loved ones names can be placed on a “hit” list!  The U.S. Constitution is what protects the guilty and the innocent from tyranny and mob rule executions and preserves a civilized nation.  Could this be an ungodly and immoral agenda with the intent of sensitizing Americans so they ignore the stories similar to the rumors that rang out in Europe when the people did nothing, while they watched millions of people executed, enslaved, imprisoned, experimented upon, and exterminated?

Should a nation of U.S. Natural Born Citizens not demand that their U.S. Congress repeal and deny funding for  illegal and unconstitutional or immoral laws that target Americans for indefinite detentions and assassinations based on accusations while these lawmakers exempt themselves from the same tyranny that they approve?   How then would Americans know if they are targeted as an “extremist” or “radical” or “dangerous?”  Does the list consist of  Christians, or Catholics and Jews?   Does the list include heterosexuals or citizens who believe in pro-life or traditional marriage?  Does the hit list consist of citizens who are Conservatives and Republicans or Libertarians? Does the “hit” list include Blacks or Hispanics or Whites or Italians or Jews?  Does the “hit” list include Pregnant Women or Sick or Disabled?  How about the Elderly, Veterans or U.S. Military who lets say believe in God or read the Bible?  Does the list include members of the  Tea party or the Oath Keepers?  How then shall the American people know which citizen names will be added to the “hit” list by the panel consisting of non-vetted Czars?

Of course, you may ask, “Who cares about Article II, anyway?  Who cares if a President of the United States is a “U.S. Natural Born” citizen?

Furthermore, Article II is the most important law of the land!    There is a legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen that clarifies that if a baby is born on U.S. soil and one parent  is foreign-born then the baby is not a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be a  U.S. President – Period!  The baby doesn’t inherit a U.S.  Birthright from their foreign-born father as required by U.S. law, but inherits a foreign-born birthright from his or her father making the baby a “naturalized” citizen only. The birthright guarantees U.S. Natural Born Citizens the right and privilege to be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, but if a usurper steals a U.S. Natural Born Citizen’s Birthright and is elected as a U.S. President,  then that person has denied a U.S. Natural Born Citizen their natural-born Birthright, who is legally eligible, to be a U.S. President.  A U.S. Natural Born Citizen Birthright must be cherished and upheld to preserve Western Civilization for it is preserved by our forefathers as a right to be an eligible U.S. President and this is the key that separates U.S. Natural Born Citizens from all Naturalized citizens.

Ironically, to my knowledge, there aren’t any senate hearings scheduled  for an investigation into the assassination of an unarmed American  and his minor child who should have been protected under the U.S. Constitution with the right to exercise due process of law, but were assassinated, prior to the NDAA being enacted.   

I think we all agree that Osama bin Laden was a dangerous leader who is reported to target America on 911.  His death was reported to have been killed or died from kidney disease 9 different times in the news by political leaders between Dec. 2001 and 2012.  Even a former CIA agent stated that Osama’s body was on ice and those reports were in the news between December 2001 -2011.  Admittedly, Obama and or Panetta ordered the assassination of the unarmed Osama sitting in a living room holding a remote versus his capture and tried.  The news reported that Obama and Panetta ordered Osama’s  body dumped into the ocean and called it a burial at sea which upset the Muslim nation.  The government published photos of Osama’s assassination, but later retracted them stating  all the photos were fakes.  I read that Muslims don’t bury their leaders at sea.  The news alleged Obama ordered Osama’s body dumped into the ocean [and fed to the sharks]. The fact that Osama wasn’t captured, even though he was unarmed, or his dead body not turned over to the proper law enforcement authorities for positive examination, left doubt in the minds of the world, especially since the assassination occurred right before elections.

The news reported that Obama and Biden were reported in the news to have exposed the identities of the Navy Seal heroes which is unprecedented.  Prior to 2009, the government wanted war criminals captured alive, if at all possible, so they could interrogate them and extract information which is what President Bush ordered after 911. For example, if a law enforcement officer killed a suspect then dumped the suspect’s body into the ocean, even if the suspect was considered an evil person, the police officer would probably be sitting in a jail cell.  Now, we’ll never know what Osama or Al-Awlaki or his teenage son, or Gaddafi or his teenage son, grandkids, and family knew about the radicals attacking the USA and declaring war on America on September 11, 2001.

Of course, people may ask, “But, who cares if he dumped Osama’s body at sea?”

Again, the Rule of Law must be followed by every citizen including public servants if justice is to prevail.  The U.S. federal government spent billions of tax dollars over 10 years for the capture of Osama bin Laden.  But, Obama and Panetta’s assassination orders reported in the news of foreign leaders should send shivers down the spine of every leader in every nation, as none of the assassinated leaders involved were armed at the time of their murders.  In fact, al-Awlaki was an American, who wasn’t charged with a crime.  On the other hand,  Libyan leader, Gaddafi, didn’t attack America. So, how does anyone know who could be next victim, whether a foreigner or an American citizen, under the NDAA Law approved by the 112th Congress and Obama.  For example, could an enemy be seen as a whistleblower or a witness?  The NDAA law leaves massive room for abuse.

Of course you may ask, “If a U.S. President thinks someone is a danger to the government then he should put a “hit” out on him?”

The Rule of Law in America makes it clear that a “hit” list and gathering names of Americans to be placed on a “hit” list in my opinion equates to a conspiracy to commit murder usually thought of as some thing a “gang” or “organized criminals” or mafia or cartels do.  “Hit” lists are utilized by criminals and shouldn’t be used against America’s  law-abiding Americans accused by their government without probable cause and a search warrant and due process of law.  This is why this nation established due process of law to protect the innocent.  We have a Department of Justice which many believe has turned into a department of injustice.

Of course, people may say, “Who cares if Obama had Osama murdered by  assassination, after all, he was a war criminal. Besides, it would cost millions of tax dollars to try him.” 

I stress, the Rule of Law must be followed in a Republic. Think about that!  If it’s okay to assassinate unarmed people without constitutional or congressional authority then what’s to prevent a government from assassinating whistleblowers and witnesses and call it legal so the witnesses can’t testify against public servants or prominent people in courts of law?  It could establish a pattern that it’s the right of the government to decide who is an enemy and silence people or dump their bodies into the ocean or shred the evidence. It would have been interesting to learn what details that  Osama and Gaddafi could have provided to the world that may have shed some light on the radicals or 911.

But people say, “Who cares if Obama ordered the murder by assassination of al-Awlaki, he was a very bad man.”

Should the U.S. Congress and judiciary fail to investigate the facts in the Osama and al-Awlaki assassinations then how shall the truth and the facts be reported for public review or how shall you defend yourself if accused under the NDAA law?

Of course, many people will ask, “Who cares if Obama attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and killed his grandkids and freedom fighters, he was a very bad man”  without the approval of the U.S. Congress or constitutional authority?

And, once again, I stand firm  that the Rule of Law must be strictly followed or Americans shall reap the tears of tyranny should the citizens not demand that congress and law enforcement uphold the constitution, especially Article II and Article IV and due process of law.   The constitution  grants congress authority and power to declare war, not the president.  We mustn’t make excuses that just because one president or public servant violated constitutional law that it’s okay for the next one to do so. Besides, Gaddafi didn’t threaten America, but he was Obama’s long time friend and supporter, who referred to Obama as “my son” and “our son” and this begs the question how he suddenly became Obama’s enemy and ended up #2 on Obama’s “hit” list, and begging for his life – unarmed – assassinated under Obama’s orders. If someone steals a cookie, should the next kid be allowed to steal 2 cookies, too?  If that’s the case, it won’t be long before all the cookies and the cookie jar are stolen.  If someone kills a dog because he’s barking, not attacking, is the murder of the dog justifiable? 

Of course,  many people say, “But, they are all bad guys.  Who cares if they were murdered by assassination?”

Well, we have bad people in America too, including evil politicians in some cases.  We, too, experience bad people exposed in our government. Americans probably have some bad friends or relatives secretly hidden away in their closets.  How then shall we complain and justify  if a good and innocent American citizen enters a foreign nation and is murdered by assassination and we complain “evil” if we don’t follow the Rule of Law?

Of course, people will say, “But, those American citizens shouldn’t have gone into that country, they were stupid.”

Of course, people do stupid things, but assassinating people because they do some thing stupid or citizens who oppose political or religious agendas shouldn’t be a reason to compile a list of citizen names to be included or added onto  a “hit” list and unknown to the citizens to be targeted for murder by assassination or indefinite detention.  They already compile secret no fly lists and innocent Americans are denied the right to get on an airplane without recourse.  Think about that!  Isn’t that what Hitler did? We watch movies of communist and Third World nations run by tyrannical leaders who assassinate and indefinitely detain people in their countries without due process of law, but are we now facing the words of “compliance” and “non-compliance?”

Listen up!  Call, email, write, your congressional members and demand that they Repeal the unconstitutional NDAA law which not only targets Americans but circumvents and shreds Article IV,  of the U.S. Constitution, Due Process of Law and Article II and vetting policies as required by our government’s congressional members and Secretary of State and Speaker of the House.  It’s written into my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” the following –  “Without Due Process of law, there is nothing, – nothing but tyranny.” 

Wake up, all you sleepy heads!  Perhaps, it’s time to unite across the nation and March on D.C. peacefully and legally with the Sheriffs and Constitutional lawyers.  The U.S. Congress must stop the insanity of shredding the U.S. Constitution and targeting law-abiding Americans who pay their wages.  What is happening in America is insane!  In fact, there are published articles reporting that the President of France, Sarkozy, met with Obama, and allegedly stated that Sarkozy said that Obama is “insane.” I don’t know about that, but I do believe  most Americans believe he has an unconstitutional agenda. And, I don’t care what anyone thinks, creating a federal panel of unidentified czars and a secret “hit” list of law-abiding Americans by selective processes, which includes illegally spying on citizens, and using U.S. tax dollars is evil.  And even more evil is collecting names of Americans accused of being an enemy of the United States without being provided due process of law and placed on a “kill list” to be murdered is insane!  These unconstitutional laws deny U.S. Constitutional Law, Article II, due process of law, the Right-to-Life, unalienable God-given rights, and killing U.S. Citizens, not foreign enemies, but U.S. Citizens is no different from pre-meditated murder in my opinion.

Shame on the 111th and 112th U.S. Congress!  It’s shocking that elected public servants would approve indefinitely detaining or assassinating Americans, which is unconstitutional, immoral, unjust, unfair, and despicable.  It’s ridiculous that American leaders would declare American citizens “guilty” as accused which reflects the tyrannical laws of barbarians.  It’s stunning that America’s leaders would approve secret kill lists and assassinate American adults and minor kids accused of a crime without due process of law.  This raises the question if the government is reducing the population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens and making room for foreigners and refugees and Communist China and Russia to claim U.S. districts of soil?   These serious unconstitutional laws should be  worrisome to Americans, as it appears that Obama and Congress, the new immigrants, refugees, and illegals are opted out of the unconstitutional laws approved by Obama and Congress, as well as the punishments, being implemented against U.S. natural-born and legal generational naturalized citizens, i.e., NDAA Law, Patriot Act, secret Kill Lists, Obamacare and the Immigration Bill.

Rose says, “A successful civilized genocide through mandates that wipe out freedom, liberty, rights, sovereignty, the right-to-life, health care, as well as  silence a nation, a nation that has been slumbering for far too long, can be argued and perceived  by evil doers as an act of genius if one views evil as a good thing for the benefit of those who implement the evil acts; thus the evil doers rationalize their acts against humanity  as justifiable and implement evil deeds without conscience.” (C) 2011

Rose Colombo, long time legal and political activist, helping victims of legal abuse become survivors for 25 years.  For more information visit Rose’s website – http://www.colombochronicles.com –

Listen to Live Radio – (all shows archived taped live on world wide online radio) – Colombo Chronicles Live at Blog Talk Radio Network:   http://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles

Read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s  Award Winner self-help book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” or her latest Political Satire with humorous fictional characters and an Orwell 1984 type of  fictional story that parallels today’s political agendas, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” google www.amazon.com

A Geert Wilders Speech: Message to Americans 2009: If You Missed the Warning!

Posted on by rose4justice

Posted:  2009; 9/29/2011; 4/23/2013;  01/01/2014 and11/5/2016 

Rose Colombo, award-winning author and fmr AM-FM radio host and producer and host of  former cable TV show states, “America is in a supernatural battle of good vs. evil in these volatile times.  The pendulum on the Scales of Justice is swinging far left both politically and socially.  America shall either maintain freedom or see radical ‘change.'”  I am reposting an important  speech delivered by Geert Wilders, which I received and saved  on about  2009.  At the time, I was warned that it was too dangerous to share, but I felt it was  important to saving our nation from possible danger and a high jacking of the USA! So,  I not only published it in 2009, but I saved it for people who would like to read it for the first time.  May God Protect America from anti-American enemies.Mr. Wilders wrote this letter under great threat by the European leaders, especially in Holland after terrorists attacked the Journalists.

Very scary……think 9/11…….think recent attempted destruction of one of our airliners…be aware………..

Snopes authenticates the delivery of the speech…………….


Geert  Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament.

America  as the last man standing
  
  ‘In a  generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost  Europe?’

Here is  the speech of Geert Wilders,  Chairman, Party for  Freedom, the Netherlands, at  the  Four Seasons, New  York, introducing an Alliance  of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad  Conference  in Jerusalem.

Dear friends,

Thank you  very much for inviting me.

I come to  America   with a mission.  All is not well in the old   world.  There is a tremendous danger  looming, and  it is very difficult to be  optimistic.  We might be in  the final  stages of the Islamization of Europe.  This  not only is a clear and present danger to the  future  of Europe itself, it is a threat to  America  and the  sheer survival of the West.  The United States as the  last bastion of Western civilization, facing an  Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the   situation on the ground in Europe.  Then, I will  say a few things about Islam.  To close,  I will tell you about  a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know  is changing.

You have probably seen  the landmarks.  But in all of these cities, sometimes a  few blocks away from your tourist  destination, there is  another world.  It is  the world of the parallel society  created by  Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout   Europe a new  reality is rising: entire Muslim  neighborhoods  where very few indigenous people reside or  are even seen.  And if they are, they might  regret  it.  This goes for the police as  well.  It’s the  world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless  tents, with baby strollers and a group of children.   Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk  three steps ahead.   With mosques on many street  corners.  The  shops have signs you and I cannot  read.  You will be hard-pressed to find any  economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos   controlled by religious fanatics.  These are  Muslim neighborhoods, and they are  mushrooming in every city  across Europe.  These are  the building-blocks for  territorial control of increasingly larger portions of  Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city  by city.

There are now thousands of mosques   throughout Europe .  With larger  congregations  than there are in churches.   And in every European city  there are plans to  build super-mosques that will dwarf every  church in the region.  Clearly, the signal is:  we rule.

Many European cities are already   one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and   Malmo in  Sweden.  In many cities the majority of  the  under-18 population is Muslim.  Paris is  now surrounded by a ring of Muslim  neighborhoods.   Mohammed is the most  popular name among boys in many   cities.

In some elementary schools in  Amsterdam  the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would  also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to  Muslims.

Many state  schools in Belgium and   Denmark  only serve halal food to all pupils.   In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up  almost exclusively by Muslims.  Non-Muslim women  routinely hear  ‘whore, whore’.  Satellite dishes are  not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the  country of origin.

In  France school  teachers  are advised to avoid authors deemed  offensive to Muslims,  including Voltaire and  Diderot; the same is increasingly  true of  Darwin.  The history of the Holocaust can  no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In   England sharia courts are now officially part of  the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France   are no-go areas for women without head  scarves.   Last week a man almost died after  being beaten up by  Muslims in Brussels,  because he was drinking during the   Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing  France  in  record numbers, on the run for the worst wave  of  anti-Semitism since World War II.   French is now  commonly spoken on the streets of  Tel Aviv and  Netanyahu, Israel.  I could go on forever with stories  like this.  Stories about Islamization.

A   total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in   Europe.   San Diego University  recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the   population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.   Bernhard Lewis has  predicted a Muslim majority by the  end of this century.

Now these are just  numbers.   And the numbers would not be  threatening if the  Muslim-immigrants had a  strong desire to assimilate.   But there are few signs of that.  The Pew Research   Center reported that half of French Muslims see their   loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to  France.  One-third of French Muslims do not  object to  suicide attacks.  The British  Centre for Social  Cohesion reported that  one-third of British Muslim students  are in  favor of a worldwide caliphate.   Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’.  And  this is how we give them respect.  We have  Muslim  official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic  attorney general is willing to accept sharia in  the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority.  We  have  cabinet members with passports from Morocco and  Turkey  .

Muslim demands are supported  by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and   random violence, for example against ambulance workers  and bus drivers, to small-scale  riots.  Paris has  seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the basileus.  I call the perpetrators  ‘settlers’.   Because that is what they are. They do not come to  integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our   society into their Dar-al-Islam.  Therefore, they  are settlers.

Much of  this street violence I  mentioned is directed  exclusively against non-Muslims,  forcing many  native people to leave their  neighborhoods, their cities, their countries..   Moreover,  Muslims are now a swing vote not to  be ignored.

The second thing you need to  know is  the importance of Mohammed the  prophet.  His behavior  is an example to all  Muslims and cannot be criticized.   Now, if  Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us  say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one,   there would be no problem.  But Mohammed  was a  warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and  had several  marriages – at the same time.   Islamic tradition tells  us how he fought in  battles, how he had his enemies murdered  and  even had prisoners of war executed.   Mohammed  himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of  Banu Qurayza.   If it is good for Islam, it is good.  If it is bad  for Islam, it is  bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam   being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and  a  here-after, and 72 virgins.  But in its  essence Islam  is a political ideology.  It  is a system that lays  down detailed rules for  society and the life of every  person.   Islam wants to dictate every aspect of   life.  Islam means ‘submission’.   Islam is  not compatible with freedom and  democracy, because what it  strives for is sharia.  If you want to compare Islam  to anything, compare it to communism  or national-socialism, these are all  totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston   Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde  force in  the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.   The public has  wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian   narrative, and sees Israel  as the aggressor.  I  have lived in this  country and visited it dozens of times.   I support Israel.  First,  because it is the Jewish homeland  after two thousand years  of exile up to and  including Auschwitz, second because it is  a democracy, and third because Israel is our first  line  of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault  line of jihad, frustrating  Islam’s territorial advance.    Israel is facing  the front lines of jihad, like  Kashmir, Kosovo,  the Philippines,  Southern Thailand,  Darfur in Sudan,  Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia.   Israel  is simply in the way.  The same  way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The  war  against Israel is not a  war against Israel.  It is a  war against the West.  It is jihad.  Israel is  simply receiving the blows that are meant for  all of us.   If there would have been no  Israel, Islamic  imperialism would have found other venues to release its  energy and its desire for  conquest.  Thanks to Israeli  parents who  send their children to the army and lay awake  at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well  and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in  Europe argue in favor of  abandoning Israel  in order to  address the grievances of our Muslim  minorities.  But  if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring  any  solace to the West It would not mean our  Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their   behavior, and accept our values.  On the   contrary, the end of Israel  would give enormous  encouragement to the forces  of Islam.  They would, and  rightly so, see  the demise of Israel  as proof that the  West is weak, and  doomed.  The end of Israel   would not mean the end of our problems with  Islam, but  only the beginning.  It would  mean the start of the  final battle for world  domination.  If they can get   Israel  , they can get everything.  So-called   journalists volunteer to label any and all  critics of  Islamic [indoctrination] as a ‘right-wing  extremists’ or ‘racists’.   In my country,  the Netherlands  , 60 percent of  the population now sees the mass  immigration of Muslims as  the number one policy  mistake since World War II.  And  another 60  percent sees  Islam as the biggest threat.   Yet there is a danger  greater danger than  terrorist attacks, the scenario of   America  as the last man standing.  The lights may   go out in Europe faster than you can  imagine.  An  Islamic Europe means a Europe  without freedom and democracy,  an economic  wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss   of military might for America  – as its allies will  turn into enemies, enemies  with atomic bombs.  With an  Islamic Europe,  it would be up to America alone to   preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and  Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most  precious  of gifts.  My generation never had  to fight for this  freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people  who fought for it  with their lives.  All throughout   Europe,  American cemeteries remind us of the young  boys  who never made it home, and whose memory  we cherish.  My generation does not own this   freedom; we are merely its custodians.  We can only  hand over this hard won liberty to  Europe’s children in  the same state in which it was offered to us.  We cannot  strike a deal  with mullahs and imams.  Future  generations  would never forgive us.  We cannot squander  our liberties.  We simply do not have the right to  do so.”

GEERT WILDERS

We  have to  take the necessary action now to stop  this Islamic strategic goal as written and stated to destroy the free world without dropping a nuke, but through illegal migration..
Please take  the time to read and  understand what is written  here, Please send it to every  free person that  you know, it is so  very important.  [The Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR is not a friend of Western Civilization. The written and stated strategic goal of the Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR organization is to invade, infiltrate, overpopulate and dominate. They intend as written and stated to infiltrate government on all levels, schools, universities, and churches. Their stated weapon is to overpopulate and dominate each city, county, then state like in Minnesota. The Muslim Brotherhood strategic written and stated goals in published in the Muslim Brotherhood book entitled, “The Project.” They use their radicalized females it appears to stir up hate for the President of the USA and the White House as witnessed in their speeches.  They use females to lead American women’s marches and encourage the America’s young females to abort their natural-born babies needed to preserve America.  The Left under Obama imposed same-sex indoctrination and transgender lifestyles  under the guise of education which are depopulation programs of future natural-born Americans.

In fact, I warned the Democrat Congress and Senate including my own reps by writing the First Blog in the nation prior to their vote on Obamacare entitled,”Obamacare is unconstitutional and illegal” and warned of death panels for Americans by euthanizing Americans chronically ill or elderly and paying for a consumer product with our own earned money after taxes that we may or may not want to buy that would be rationed or denied to Americans which are death panels and depopulation for Americans only because Obama and Congress exempted themselves, donors, and illegals and Muslims.

After Obama was slipped into office in 2009 with the blessings of Holder and the Clinton’s, McCain,Soros, Bush’s, the Democrats cared less that Obama couldn’t provide a vetted Certified U.S. Birth Certificate which is required to be a U.S. President or a U.S. Senator, but it apparently, it was all about the money – stimulus money – funneling tax dollars – and making deals with foreign nations and even foreign enemy nations. Much of the stimulus money went to radiate Americans which is a death panel as well as to donors such as Mr.Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, billionaire George Soros, IMF, Muslim Brotherhood leaders  such as Morsi and Odinga and Planned Parenthood and the migrations of radicals and illegals into the USA.

Obama and Holder concealed  Obama’s true identification, Military Registration if any, Repatriation papers if any, Indonesian Citizenship, Kenyan Birth Certificate, and foreign student body card and loan, Law License, and all Credentials from the American citizens. Obama and Holder inserted instructions into President Bush’s existing Presidential Order making it impossible for anyone to review anything without the permission of Obama and Holder.

After Justice John Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq., prior to the inauguration in January 2009, his decision appears to me to be extremely careless, but I guess he thought, “What difference at this point, does it make? 

I wrote to Justice Roberts and each Justice in support of attorney Berg’s  eligibility lawsuit based on We The People’s and stated that We are the Government and have “Standing” because we pay the wages of the POTUS and all public servants. We The People are entitled to vet the candidates in exchange for votes and taxpayer funded wages with benefits.  I explained in my letter that if  Justice Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit that he could be setting a very bad precedent in the future that could lead to foreign spies, illegals, enemies of the USA, and cartels or terrorists accessing the highest office in the land. I was correct.

Apparently, Justice Roberts didn’t care because he denied the eligibility lawsuit. And, today, California’s Governors Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s nephew, opened the borders to illegals and jihadist, cartels and gangs, by denying ICE and Border Patrol the right to inspect the illegals entering into California who bypassed legal Ports of Entry.  Brown and Newsom and their Democrat administration are not being removed by the DOJ for aiding and abetting, harboring, and materially assisting illegals inside the USA but rewarding the illegals and fake or real Refugees/asylum seekers with U.S. American tax dollars earned by hard-working legal Americans who pay their wages to uphold the law, not violate the law.  Illegal means Illegal and that word is defined to describe a criminal in the U.S. Law books – all of the U.S. Law Books!  This appears to me that the Democrats may have pledged their allegiance to secret international entities or persons or societies. 

Govs. Brown Family and the Pelosi Family have ruined California while they’ve made themselves wealthy living off taxpayers. Speaker Nancy Pelosi engaged in Insider Trading with windfalls in the millions and called it legal while Martha Stewart went to jail. She was creating her wealthy Family Dynasty!  In fact, the same people have been running the Democrat Congress and California for 20-40 years or more….running it into the ground from the most wealthy Golden State in the union to the most impoverished state that turned the Golden Gate City of San Francisco into a ghetto.

Governors Brown and Newsom care less about legal Americans, they only care about turning California into a foreign nation so did Hillary Clinton give California away to China or Mexico?  It’s been reported that many illegals and refugees stated they came to the USA because they were promised freebies paid by the taxpayers. They promised the illegals and fake or real asylum seekers that the Americans would pick up their lifetime tab for Obamacare, living expenses, Drivers Licenses, and even allow illegals to run for public office!  Fortunately, Brown is gone and Newsom is facing 2,000,000 signatures demanding he be Recalled as Governor of California. It can’t be soon enough.

Obama was quick in 2009 right after the inauguration to inform 330,000,000 Americans that “America is no longer a Christian nation.”  He said that America would be changed and “transformed” in the next 5 days.  He stated that the U.S. Constitution was”meaningless” and Congress was “meaningless” and he would use his Blackberry and pen to sign E.O.’s into law bypassing the congressional legislatures who are elected to write the laws, not Obama.

I will never forget the Obama speech in CAIRO when Obama aka Barry Soetoro shocked everyone and spoke to the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in perfect Arabic and stated that he knows….because he is “one of them.  On that day, he promised the Muslims two states.  I still recall thinking if he was promising them Europe and America.

Furthermore, not long after that CAIRO speech, he flew off to Germany and didn’t address America or Americans, he said, “People of the World.”  Apparently, he believed he was the One World Leader rising up. He also immediately flew to Canada and Mexico to speak to the Presidents in those 2 countries where the preplanned secret radicals would be entering to come into the USA it appears.

Obama and Hillary Clinton’s secret pre planned migration of Somalians and Palestinians linked to the MB-CAIR-Hamas-Hezbollah organizations were flown into the USA late at night by their orders and taxpayer funded DHS buses were being used to scatter them around the country. Obama and Hillary Clinton diverted U.S. Tax Dollars (stimulus) and used  U.S. Refugee Centers to  push through as many radicals as possible each day for 8 years before the funding ran out. The whistleblowers stated they did little or no vetting.

It appears the radicals were promised free everything even if they were polygamist, healthy and able to work, with several wives and dozens of kids.  Polygamy and Bigamy and Incest are serious crimes int he USA, but  the Democrats cared less that this is a violation of U.S. Laws.  Obama and the Democrats didn’t care because they were working overtime to change and transform for USA into a foreign nation of illegals and radicals. Obama repeatedly met in secret many times with the Muslim Brotherhood leaders for 8 years in the White House. He promised the radicals from foreign enemy nations that they would receive free housing, health care, SNAP Food credit, education and he approved a Hate Crimes Bill that discriminates against Americans, Christians, Jews, and patriots who are accused of offending the foreigners.  This is a discriminatory bill and should be voided now! 

Obama allowed the radicals to set up what is called no-go zones on American soil – our Homeland. The  Democrats and RINOS cared less about anything Obama and Holder and Hillary and their Democrat regime didn’t care what they weren’t doing for America, but what they were doing to America, and for themselves. We are no different than Europe during WWII.  We are no different than Europeans currently watching Macron and Merkel, Belgium and Sweden, New Zealand selling out their natural-born citizens and Homeland to radicals from across the oceans. I

If Americans don’t wake up to the truth and protect and stand with President Donald J.Trump and unite as loyal Natural Born or loyal generational naturalized Americans and demand our borders are secured and that Detain and Deport is Restored they win. We must Demand that the Republic is restored and operated by the established constitutional laws that protect the borders and legal Americans who own their Homeland and are required by law to defend it from foreign and domestic enemies.  

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Is Sharia Law Approved on US Soil And Prohibited by U.S. Constitutional Law an act of Treason against the United States?

Posted on by rose4justice
Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!
Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!

Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015

How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld?  Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law.  Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows:  “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”

In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators.  The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent.  This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical  lawmakers  who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.”  Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.  Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights,  And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the  Law of Nations.

Sharia Law states it is a Law.  And, it is a foreign Law!  The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period.  It is called “Treason.”  Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East.  Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well.  The experts on Sharia state that  Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but  all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law.  It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.

Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated.  Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as  Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel.  The  U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from  church and state and provides freedom of religion in America.  In other words,  Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately.  Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the  Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization  with Sharia Law.  And, there lies a major difference.  The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is  the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.

In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow.  In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!

On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land.  There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization.  It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs.  Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.

Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food,  and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children.  But, in America, a majority of  U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches.  Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level?   Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization.  We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!

For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil.  Should we not ask  if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans?   If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the  U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization,  then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported.  Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and  discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely.  In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.

In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare.  It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty.  In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill?  If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped  from their titles by We The People?

It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and  to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason.  Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by.  The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!

Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only?  Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to  freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?

The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare.  This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves!  I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.

The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance.  It’s their way or the highway!  Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often.  The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.

Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion!  It states what it is – Sharia Law.  A LAW!  In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world.  One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization.  The radicals killed 3,000 Americans.  They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old  Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration.  They damaged the Pentagon.  They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke.  Many 911 witnesses  who came forward and testified about  what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind.  Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.

Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting  Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East.  They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims.  They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books.  The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny  freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but  exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.

Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.”  Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of  religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not  political “Laws,” but separate laws in America.  Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time.  Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization.  And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment.  The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food.  Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.

The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:

In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” one must understand their meaning and intent and purpose.  The Law defines “Religion” as follows:  “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”

Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation.  If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.

The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude  inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ?  And, why does a health care law include  2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts?  Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans.  It uses programs to reduce the population of future  U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies.  Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world.  The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.

Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses.  And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue  American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law.  What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States?  In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state.  People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.

Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution.  Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.

Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths?   Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag.  Again,  Sharia Law states  exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is  written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all  laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws.  Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal?   How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law!  Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?

Treason:  “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies.  Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary.   (Note:  Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer.  It’s unethical to ignore the laws of  plagiarism) 

If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated

Preview Image  Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HM5V4XK5J8EP4

Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding”  with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

Sen. Hillary Clinton and Obama Attached an Amendment To A Military Bill Prior to 2008 Elections to Change Article II/ Remove The Words “Natural Born Citizen”

Posted on by rose4justice

Rose Colombo (pub.) October 2011, rev. 2016

How is it that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Obama were secretly attaching an amendment into a military bill sponsored by Rep. McCaskill on or about 2008 prior to the presidential elections with the intent to change Article II of the U.S. Constitution and secretly  remove the words, U.S. “Natural Born Citizen,” while Senator Hillary Clinton was Obama’s opposing candidate? And, why would this be necessary prior to the elections of 2008 since Hillary Clinton was running against Obama?

Unfortunately, I didn’t have this information when I met with Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-Ca) on June 24, 2011 in his Washington D.C. office.  Rep. Rohrabacher is a congenial man and a pioneer of securing the borders and I support him.  But, my time was limited and I wanted to make the most of my visit so, I blurted out the big question, “Why hasn’t congress commenced impeachment hearings against Obama?”  He smiled and said there are people working on it.  So,  I asked my next question, “Shouldn’t heads be rolling and people stepping down who are responsible for the gun-running into Mexico by U.S. agents?”  And then, we were interrupted.  At my next opportunity I said, “Don’t you agree that Congress should stand up to Communist China and tell their leaders that America’s wiping out the debt  which they claim is owed to them by the U.S.A.

Until recently, i wasn’t aware that Hillary Clinton, a candidate for President against Obama in 2008, were concerned about removing the words “natural born citizen” from the U.S. Constitution.  Together, they attempted  to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, and remove the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from the constitution by inserting a proposal into a Military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill, which is dishonest and without transparency, but the real question is why would Hillary Clinton running against Obama 1)  want to assist him in removing the words “natural born citizen” as a constitutional requirement,’  2) what did she know about Obama’s Birth Certificate; and 3)  Why would she want to help him to become an ineligible President if she was seeking to be the first female President back in 2008?

The fact remains that it’s alleged that former Democratic Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, altered the Certification of a U.S. President document so, he could be eligible and she wouldn’t be held accountable by the original words established for former U.S. Presidents.  It appears that an exception was made in 2008.  Senator Hillary Clinton assisted  non-vetted Senator Obama as well as Senator McCaskill and other Democratics and RINOS in  removing the words, U.S. “Natural Born Citizen” from Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, it would appear that any questions about Obama’s eligibility, according to Article II of the U.S. Constitution would be rendered moot, but unfortunately for Obama aka Barry,  Article II remains intact after their attempt.

Therefore, I’ve compiled a list of Congressional bills that were proposed and intended to secretly eliminate the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution forevermore:

Rep. Vic Snyder, (D-Ark) proposed a bill to change Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

2.  September 3, 2003:  Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 on September 3, 2003.

3.  February 25, 2004, Rep. Don Nickles, (R-Ok) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, SB 2128.

4.  September 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Ca) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, HJR 104

5.  January 4, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Ca) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, HJR 42

5.  January 4, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Ca) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, HJR 42

6.  April 15, 2005, Rep. Snyder (D-Ark) proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, HJR 42

7.  April 10, 2008, election year, Senator Claire McCaskill with supporters, namely former Senator Hillary Clinton and former Senator Barack Obama, proposed changing Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, under HJR 42, and slipping it unnoticed into a military bill as an amendment which would amend the U.S. Constitution without voter approval and made Obama’s eligibility issue moot if it had been approved.  Now, how transparent is that since Obama stated during his campaign that he would be the most transparent president ever!  Obama has been the least transparent president, ever!

In my opinion, failing to vet a candidate by requiring a Certified U.S. Birth Certificate be attached to a Application Form and rejected if not attached should be an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution to avoid altering government documents in the future to slip in a non-vetted man or woman into the highest office in the land.  Vetting protects Americans from opening the door to imposter, foreigners, usurpers, illegal aliens, foreign spies, and criminals, who infiltrate, invade with their own, and overpopulate with invaders – a Trojan Horse – in order to conquer and steal a nation for their own as witnesses throughout history.

Upon my return from Washington D.C., I discovered disturbing information regarding Senator Hillary Clinton and former Senator Barack Hussein Obama.  I read that Senators Hillary Clinton and Obama supported the same Senate Bill, SB 2678, introduced prior to the 2008 election which would eliminate the words U.S. “Natural Born Citizen” as mandated by the supreme law of the land, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5,  an established law of the U.S. Constitution preserved for 235 years.  They attempted to slip their amended “change” that would change Article II without  public disclosure by attaching it as an Amendment and eliminating the words, “Natural Born Citizen,” proposed by Senator Claire McCaskill’s Senate Bill titled “Children of Military Families Natural Citizen’s Act” dated April 10, 2008.   In other words, if the amendment attached to the senate bill had passed, it would have changed Article II and removed the words, U.S. “Natural Born Citizen” from the constitution.

Although, the  myriad of  lawsuits filed by lawyers related to Obama’s presidential eligibility aren’t moot, but they were dismissed by the U.S. Justice Roberts and by federal judges who refused to hear these cases or hold Obama accountable to produce a Certified U.S. Birth Certificate in a court of law.  Instead, he spent $2,000,000 more or less concealing the Certified U.S. Birth Certificate.  And, when Fuddy,  reported in worldwide articles to be a member of a cult in Indonesia which included Stanley Ann Dunham and Lolo Soetoro happened to know the allged white Communist grandparents of Obama in Hawaii where you only needed to say you were a citizen of the USA at the time with little proof to obtain a Long Form Birth Certificate.

Anyone even remember the name Fuddy?  Maybe, she should have been placed in the witness protection program. How is it that so many witnesses end up dead in America? was the witness in the eligibility case who was to deliver the Certified Hawaiian Birth Certificate to court, but SURPRISE -her plane was reported to have crashed, and the Birth Certificate and Fuddy’s memory as a witness was all washed away like Clinton’s 33,000 emails were wiped away clean and computers and phones were hammered to pieces which should have been considered evidence even by an “incompetent” or “unreasonable” prosecutor.

Therefore, how is it that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Obama supported an amendment to change the presidential eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution without the knowledge, approval or vote of the American people or Congress whose suppose to represent We The People, but they are big time failures when it comes to performing their duty to uphold vetting and identification laws of a U.S. President it does appear.  Surely they were aware that if Obama was disqualified based on Article II, that Hillary Clinton,  whose agendas morphed into  Obama’s agendas, would have allowed her to win the highest office in the land against McCain.

After all, McCain didn’t debate Obama with any teeth nor did he menti Obama’s eligibility.  In fact, even Obama said he was surprised that Senator McCain didn’t say anything about Senator Obama’s Muslim Faith, because he stated that he didn’t want to “embarrass” him.  And it was quite apparent that the media favored Obama and Hillary during the debates.  Perhaps, McCain was just a puppet candidate or feared that he’d be called a “racist” if he did fight back, so why run for office as it guaranteed Obama a win-win situation.  Was the Democratic Socialist Soros  viewed as “The Fix is in?”

But, the Amendment attached to McCaskill’s Senate Bill  wasn’t the only law proposed by Republican and Democratic congressional members which would change or eliminate the words U.S. “Natural Born Citizen.” There were several attempts to help out Obama removing the words “natural born citizen” prior to the elections that were introduced into Congress.  In fact, when Obama ran for the seat of the Illinois Senate, he was supported with big donations from the SEIU Union in Chicago and surprisingly, the two natural born American candidates, I believe one was a incumbent, suddenly suddenly bowed out of the race and Obama aka Barry won the Senate Seat in Illinois when he was poor and unopposed.  Now, he’s wealthy and still unopposed by the Clinton’s, Bush Dynasty, Soros, Kissinger, and the Democrats and same political career hacks from the 60’s and 70’s.

The amendment to the U.S. Congress proposed before the 2008 presidential elections begs the question as to WHEN Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Congress, and the U.S. Justices gained knowledge that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro was chosen as an alleged ineligible candidate to run for the highest office in the land.  And, why didn’t Hillary Clinton and John McCain make a big deal and demand a Certified Birth Certificate and Credentials be produced, but they did not if the fix wasn’t in for the pre-selected and pre-elected 2008 elections?

After all, myself and average Americans realized Obama’s introduction in a congressional hearing, when the media just happened to be present and they introduced him and he stood up and the Congress applauded the unknown senator.  I immediately recognized that Congress was about to groom Obama aka Barry to be the President of the United States of America.  And, I was correct when he announced on or about December 2007 after stating he was too “inexperienced” to be a U.S. President.  Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama was a stranger in the night to the American people, but 51% didn’t care then and apparently they don’t care today!

Electing Hillary  Clinton is getting 8 more years of Barack Hussein Obama and The Bush Dynasty, Soros, Kissinger, the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence, and more change and transformation to end the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Freedom, Liberty, Rights, and Sovereignty.  America  will be gone and Americans could be depopulated and indefinitely detained and enslaved to the New World Order!  America, the One Nation Under God, turned away from God and many Black Americans believed Obama was the savior and began praying to him, praising him and singing to him!  They cried such as Oprah – Jesse Jackson – Al Sharpton – and the Gay Hollywood Militant Community as well as the military group known as La Raza.  They believed Obama was “The One” who would pay their rent, housing, Food Stamps, and replace American workers with their children!  Americans would pay for their education.  Obama would appoint them into positions of power like DHS-Fema – EPA – Staff Advisers linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The entire federal government provided the support that an inexperienced man whose dad was married with kids, foreign born and linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and United Nations and couldn’t legally marry a white woman on U.S. soil because of segregation laws and Bigamy laws would have sent him to jail, not to Harvard!  They voted for a non-Repatriated Citizen of Indonesia, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, who stated he was too inexperienced to be a U.S. President and who posted an on-line forged Certificate of Live Birth which made it invalid and should have been grounds to disqualify him to be a U.S. President just like he was disqualified and disbarred to be a Lawyer and lied to America that he and his wife were active lawyers and failed to disclose the truth.

Barry aka Obama’s experience in the Senate included voting for Mandated Taxpayer Funded Abortions under his proposed law to depopulate future natural born Americans, The Global Poverty Act, approved by the CFR, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Diane Feinstein, Joe Biden, Obama, and the rest of the sell outs.  Obama aka Barry voted for Infanticide and partial-birth abortion for future natural born citizens.  More future and born natural born citizens have been slaughtered on the abortion tables than Americans killed at war.

The question remains why the U.S. Media and entire Federal Government failed to properly vet which is the duty of the Journalists and Investigative reporters, but they didn’t care, either, and point the finger at law-abiding Americans who are asking for a legal documents and proof be vetted in a court of law by forensic experts, but they, too, are stonewalled by the White  House, Congress, Senators, Justices, Federal Judges, and MSM.

So, the identify of who many refer to as the “Manchurian Candidate”  remains a mystery when reading about his legal biological dad  and possibly mother, too!  Many people believe they were Communist and CIA agents and this was pre-planned by the Communist to “finish the job” they began when Genghis Khan and other world leaders attempted to implement the New World Order and become the One World Leader which led to WW II and could lead to World War III.  In fact, Obama’s alleged Brother, Malik Obama, questions if Barry aka Obama is a biological son of  Barack Hussein Obama, Senior.  The Kenyan alleged half-brother says, Obama’s never helped them and doesn’t really want them around his elitist friends in D.C. now that he’s wealthy.  So will the real Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama or Barack Shabazz or Harrison Bounell or Tim Allen Owens or Bari Shabazz, please stand up!

How is it that Americans don’t ask questions of candidates, but they put them out there after pre-selection by the New World Order choosing their own with their own agendas, Kissinger mentors them, Soros pulls the strings and donates to his cause which is to destroy America and turn American into a foreign nation of Communism and enslaved by the Middle East.  He’s on evil man in my opinion who owes about $6.7 million in deferred taxes and donates to the Obama and Clinton presidential campaigns.

This raises the question if  anyone who was responsible for vetting Obama’s credential and Certified Birth Certificate from Kenya and Hawaii – apparently, there are two – express one ounce of curiosity as to why Michelle and  Obama were investigated the the Illinois State Bar or why they turned over their law licenses, but lied to Americans that they were active Lawyers during the campaign back in 2007-2008?  So, the lies began long before 2008!  In fact, MSM and the Democrats presented Obama aka Barry as an alleged prominent constitutional lawyer and a Columbia Law Professor who denied that he was a law professor, but a substitute and lazy.

How is it the entire government cares less if Obama is Barri/Bari Shabazz or Harrison or Owens or Barry Soetoro?  How is it they care less if he  attended Columbia University of Law as a foreign student as Barry Soetoro on a foreign student loan?  Was he vetted upon returning to the USA as a young adult and Repatriated since he was a Legal Indonesian Citizen as Indonesia Law required relinquishing citizenship and their schools mandate only Islamic Studies can be taught.  And, upon returning into the USA as Barry Soetoro, the stepson of Lolo Soetoro, when did he Repatriate himself within the required Statute of Law?  Did the entire government not care if his Passport was a U.S. Passport or foreign Passport upon re-entry into the USA as Barry Soetoro?  Did his original  Law License issue his license as Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama?   What about his Social Security Card which lawyers allege belongs to a dead man?  Obama or Barry would have had to apply for a Social Security card upon re-entry into the USA because U.S. babies who were born before 1979 weren’t issued Social Security Numbers. So, when did he apply for a Social Security Number?  What about his Selective Service Records?  Barry or Obama and Bill Clinton never served in the U.S. Military and have shown disdain for our Military.

Unfortunately for at least 8 years, the Federal Government  failed to properly vet a young Black-White man, a Mulatto, who was slipped into the Illinois Senate.  At the same time, two legal natural born Americans who were qualified and vetted suddenly dropped out of the race.  Obama aka Barry won the Illinois Senate Seat  unopposed supported by the overwhelming donations from the SEIU Union and SWU.  Obama gave many speeches to the union workers whose he’s put out of work since that time by stirring up their emotions and stating that he would paint the USA Purple, one community at a time.  And, they bought his fairy tale.

Thereafter, MSM was in bed with the Liberal Socialst Democrats and New World Order Ceo’s and Politicians, as well as taking Saudi donations and investments, which includes donations made to Columbia, Georgetown and Harvard Universities to begin the changes in the USA that will eliminate U.S. History in the future and the Christian roots, traditions, and foundation.  The fix was in to donate to public schools and begin the insertion of foreign ideologies and recruit America’s children into foreign ideologies and religion and eliminate the Pledge of Allegiance, Christian Prayers, the National Anthem as you watch the brainwashed Football Players refuse to stand or place their hands on the hearts  and support the country who past generations shed their blood so they could get up everyday in their new BMW that their parents bought for them and wear designer clothes and play football, while kids in the Middle East, are being recruited to kill the  infidels and hate America and Americans and burn on U.S. Flag on domestic and foreign soil as witnessed in the news and on video and social media.

Americans were duped thinking that they were voting for two prominent lawyers and a Law professor at Columbia University.  But, the two Black African parents were in reality, two “inactive” aka “disbarred” lawyers.  The only reason to turn in law licenses after an investigation by the Illinois State Bar is if the case is one of a very serious nature.  The question remains blowing in the wind how could he state he’s a Law Professor when he’s turned in his law license and Columbia University said he was a substitute teacher and lazy.  On the other hand, Obama aka Barry’s long time buddy,  Bill Ayers and his wife, had been charged years back as the founders of the “Weather Underground,” a domestic terrorist organization who bombed Americans.

Bill Ayers and his wife were charged with domestic terrorism, but only the wife went to jail and Ayers got a pass even though he said he didn’t do enough [damage] to America and it’s reported that he’s stated that 25,000,000 Americans should be killed. Maybe, he should begin with himself.  They were rewarded and ended up with jobs at a major university instructing America’s youth, assisting Obama with his book, which many believe are Ayers’ father’s dreams, and assisting with the mentoring of ACORN members who went to jail for  voter fraud in 2008.

The fact remains that it’s alleged that former Democratic Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, altered the Certification of a U.S. President document so, he could be eligible and she wouldn’t be held accountable by the original words established for former U.S. Presidents.  It appears that an exception was made in 2008.  Senator Hillary Clinton assisted  non-vetted Senator Obama as well as Senator McCaskill and other Democratics and RINOS in  removing the words, U.S. “Natural Born Citizen” from Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, it would appear that any questions about Obama’s eligibility, according to Article II of the U.S. Constitution would be rendered moot, but unfortunately for Obama aka Barry,  Article II remains intact after their attempt.

Shouldn’t Americans be asking themselves how is it legal for a candidate applying for the highest office in the land to be protected from the entire government and a government who refuses to perform their sworn duty and properly correct the record and vet  Barry aka Barack since they are  risking the  lives, health, and safety of 330,000,000 Americans as well as  the U.S. military who may be at risk  while law enforcers are weakened and being murdered on our streets under this non-vetted man’s self-imposed E.O.’s?

Shouldn’t they use common sense which is required as part of their job duty and ponder if a non-vetted President were elected and had disdain for the U.S. Flag, National Anthem, Bible, U.S. History, troubled as stated by his mother’s race, White People, disdain for the Military as he purges and downsizes our military and defenses, disdain for our Veterans who are homeless and dying and can’t access health care;  mocks Jesus, praises a foreign idol who is known to be a pedophile, and has disdain for Traditional Marriage, and appears to be gay making the family unit no more than a fairy tale to access power and control, promotes death to the  future natural born citizens, who are Christians, Jews, and loyal Patriots; and supports releasing terrorists but disrespect America’s Law Enforcers is a problem for America?

This raises the question in the minds of millions of Americans as to why would the U.S. Justices refuse to hear a simple eligibility case and refuse to correct the record knowing Obama wasn’t vetted properly according to Article II of the U.S. Constitution as it is their fiduciary duty to uphold, defend, and preserve all Articles of the U.S. Constitution as their sworn duty is a question that was a mystery but as always leads to follow the money..

In 2008, how is it that the federal government who can access to the most powerful identification technology in the world appears to be clueless that Obama may not have been properly vetted and allegedly ineligible for the office of U.S. president based on his name alone and refuses to vet his records?

How is it that they didn’t notice for four  years that 33,000 Top Secret and Confidential Emails were missing from government property until Hillary got caught and she and her team of paid lawyers were given the Comey and Lynch get-out-of-jail Golden Pass to be rewarded with access to the White House?

How is it that no one in the Federal Government noticed for two years that Obama-Holder-Ogden-and Hillary Clinton implemented Fast and Furious and Holder and Hillary traveled to Mexico to assure the President who complained the guns were being trafficked from the USA to the Cartels would be investigated, but continued for two years until they got caught when Border Patrol men were murdered with those same guns and yet, they weren’t held accountable for rewarded  with the golden pass!  So, you see, there is a two-tier justice system and they get the Golden Passes and everyone else gets to go to FEMA Camps who opposes their agendas is it?

How is it possible for the ABA to remain silent as well as the Illinois State Bar when they had knowledge that Obama wasn’t an active lawyer because the Federal branch of the Illinois Supreme Court had investigated him for wrong doing and prohibited him from practicing law with knowledge that he was running for the highest office in the land? And, how is it that the media didn’t bother to dig into the public records of disbarred lawyers, which for some odd reason, changed “disbarred” to “inactive” on Obama’s records even though they were investigated for serious issues and prohibited from practicing law?

So, how is it that the U.S. Justices, ABA, and congressional members are silent when it comes to Obama writing Executive Orders and  Presidential Directives or allegedly circumventing the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Congress in order to control the U.S. by declaring the Constitution and Congress “meaningless” as he uses his “pen” to approve new laws or change existing legal laws into illegal legal unconstitutional laws and even unread laws as Executive Orders, which were never intended to be used to make laws?  How is it that the EPA and IRS and DHS, the shadow government, are being used to enforce excessive regulations?  It is remarkable that a presidential candidate can slip through the cracks and by-pass the most stringent security laws in the nation and access the highest office of the land without being properly vetted, and appoint anti-Americans persons into positions of power, but the average citizen applying for a job as a clerk must nearly be naked x-rayed and patted down and produce a Certified Birth Certificate to fly out of the country.

Furthermore, it’s remarkable that the State of Hawaii has refused to cooperate with law enforcement and provide the lawyers and Sheriffs with a Certified copy of Obama’s Hawaiian Birth Certificate for vetting which set a bad precedent for future candidates who refuse to provide their identification papers.

Obama is the only person in U.S. History who has held the Office of U.S. without being properly vetted and who concealed his credentials and identification from the entire Federal Government, State Governments, and the American voters and taxpayers!  An important statement in my book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, which I’ve repeated on talk radio, “Rose Colombo ‘N The Justice Club, “There is no justice!  There are only decisions. Remember, Justice is an illusion and Americans are set up for the disillusionment.”

Think about this!  Any person, who refuses to give his name to the police, even if he or she isn’t doing anything wrong, can go to jail or be injured or killed justified by two simple words, “Probable Cause.”   In fact, Christian grandmothers holding biblical signs at a gay march were arrested and were looking at a possibility of 40 years in jail which caused them excessive legal fees to fight back..  Christians standing near a Muslim event with Christian literature were arrested.  Kids dancing in D.C. on a public sidewalk were arrested after non-vetted Senator Obama was elected as a non-vetted President Obama. In fact, kids kissing in public in D.C. were arrested. Recently, a police officer pulled a gun on kids having a snowball fight.  Americans were free to do all of the above before 2009!

It appears that the majority of taxpayer funded leaders who run the Federal Government since non-vetted Barry of Barack was allowed to run despite the fact, his dad was foreign-born generational and a Muslim Brotherhood link and Subject of Great Britain that made him ineligible to be a U.S. President and didn’t meet the standards of eligibility, because Barack Obama Sr. was never born in the USA and was married with children in Kenya so this fairy tale makes no sense during a time in the USA when a Black man couldn’t speak to a White woman because of strict and high feverish segregation.  It was prior to the MLK Marches and civil Rights.

In fact, a White woman could not marry a Black man and Black Americans were not called Black Africans which appears on Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth nor were they referred to as Black Americans.  Obama Senior couldn’t have married Stanley Ann Dunham without legal documents and in violation of segregation laws and bigamy laws.  The law would probably also require a U.S. Social Security number, Citizenship papers, and Divorce Documents from his legal wife in Kenya because in the USA, Bigamy is a crime.  Obama would be a Mulatto, not a Black American, and a Citizen of Indonesia by the time he returned into the USA.  Obama or Barry Soetoro would need to apply for Repatriation and a Social Security Card and a U.S. Passport, and a legal name change, so where are those certified legal documents?

In conclusion, many Americans believe that the fix was in when Barry aka Obama was slipped into the Office of Illinois Senator and surprisingly, two natural born American candidates, who were qualified, and I believe one was an incumbent, suddenly dropped out of the race and Obama aka Barry won the election as an unopposed candidate.  He was supported with donations by the SEIU Union and SWU.  Obama gave speeches stating that he  would paint the USA Purple one community at a time.  Thereafter, when the inexperienced candidate running for U.S. President announced about December 2007 that he was running for the highest office in the land based upon his career as a “Chicago Community Organizer,” then the agenda to conceal his identification and credentials from the entire government was hatched without opposition by anyone in the federal government it does appear.

On or about 2008-2009, the  U.S. Justices dismissed every single eligibility case filed by constitutional attorney, Philip J. Berg, prior to the inauguration, and thereafter filed by more lawyers and citizens, but they didn’t care to vet a Senator and U.S. President named Barry or Obama,which is their duty,  but they made this one exception.  It’s more interesting that the Justices and Judge who are lawyers and Congress, a majority of lawyers, would fail to disclose that the Soetoro’s or Obama’s are “disbarred” aka “inactive”  lawyers which probably would have disqualified Barry aka Obama as a candidate.  As a long time advocate for justice, the State Bar says that lawyers, who want to take a leave from their job duties, aren’t required to turn in their law licenses if they are “inactive,” only if they are “disbarred” for wrong doing.  Some times, the lawyers agree to turn in their law licenses versus going to trial and to jail if found guilty.

One question that should have been asked by the American citizens should have been if  Barry aka Obama turned over his law license to the Illinois State Bar then how could he be a Law professor and as he’s stated teach law?  Another question might be – if Bill Ayers and his wife were charged with Domestic Terrorism, and only the wife ended up in jail, how could they be University Professors teaching Americans kids on U.S. soil?  It’s reported that Ayers is a  long time association of Barry aka Obama.  Ayers alleged that he wrote the book for Obama and helped Obama mentor ACORN whose members committed voter fraud in 2008.

In fact, it’s a fact that the leaders of the entire federal government cared less about identifying Obama aka Barry even as more lawyers and citizens would file lawsuits seeking proof of his identity, but they were stonewalled and the judges continuously cited, “no standing” which is not true.  The judicial system stonewalls justice even though the taxpayers fund their jobs and benefits for life.  In other words, they stabbed Americans in the back and may be enslaving Americans to foreign international bodies, especially in this particular case.  The leaders of the entire federal government cared less that they failed to properly vet a Senator and U.S. President named Barry or Obama.

It’s the duty of elected Public Servants who swear to uphold their duties of Public Office to be men and women of integrity, but those days are long gone now as there are but a few good men left in D.C., the District of Corruption.  Lawyers get disbarred and go to jail for a lot less than someone  such as Barry aka Obama, who its been alleged by many,  that he may have not disclosed the truth  on his application about his legal name or citizenship or used a fake ID or someone else’s  social Security Number. And when the majority of the alleged immediate family members, who were White Communists, and his long-time Black mentor all died as well as the Indonesian stepdad and the Indonesian half-sister, including close friends who attended Rev. Wright’s church, their truth is dead as well.

Remember, if Senator Hillary Clinton and the listed congressional members in this article who participated in removing the words “natural born citizen” had succeeded by slipping their proposal inside a Military bill then Obama could have avoided hiring a  team of lawyers to protect himself from producing his personal records for identification purposes at a cost estimated between  $1.4 million up to $2,000,000 in legal fees.   MSM was very good at defusing the Birth Certification stories by blaming the American Citizens who asked for his Birth Certificate to be vetted in a court of law by forensic experts.  Yet, Obama passed a law that legal Americans must also have a Certified Birth Certificate along with a Passport when traveling out of the country.  Voting for Hillary and Bill Clinton is voting for the ushering in of the New World Order and the loss of America’s Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Sovereignty and Citizenship laws forever.

COMMENT BELOW  and if you like the Blog – Follow – Like – if you enjoy reading Rose4Justice Blogs N Radio Shows which is read by more than 30,000 intelligent people with inquisitive minds making informed decisions.

You’re invited to read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of  Rose Colombo’s award-winning  books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” available at www.amazon.com

Follow:  facebook/rose.colombo.9    and     Twitter@Rose4Justice

Radio Shows, Wednesday, 12noon to 1:00 pm pst – worldwide online radio podcast with prominent national authors and experts:  Colombo Chronicles Live!  Host, Rose Colombo – http://www.blogtalkradio.com/colombochronicles