Did Panetta Say That He and Obama Seek OK of Intern’l Powers to Deploy Troops; Declare War; Forget the U.S. Congress?

Posted on by rose4justice
Rose Colombo, author, Political Activist &, Legal Consultant for Justice
Rose Colombo, author, Political Activist &, Legal Consultant for Justice

by Rose Colombo – original pub.(C) 3/21/2012 -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder

Did  Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t  any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?  

In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about  March 2012.  Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly.  Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?

Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants;  but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future.  Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?

Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law.  For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter?  The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive.  So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety  since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty?  Also, the attacks on Libya,  in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.

Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies?  Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority?  Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?

Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution.  He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States

Rep.  Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree.  Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal  basis.”  He said, “We want to build a coalition – we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”

Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some “international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act.  He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.

Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.”  He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you.  If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.

Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.”  Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis.  Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that.  If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here.  We want to build an international support.

Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat.  Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution.  Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by  Panetta’s statements.

Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.

So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress?  Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution.  It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.

In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?

The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175).   It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it.  They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere.  For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion.  I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another.  I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.”  In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of  Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.

Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers?  How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as  Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends.   How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place?  At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and  the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.

Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation.   How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution?  For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder,  without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price.  If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?

Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution?  Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or  2 men the right to knight themselves with  absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen?  Obama called the attack on Libya,  a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days.  Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the  answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?

In conclusion,  if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country.  If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern,  it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.

Furthermore, if  the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion?  America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders  conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?

How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law  rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA?  By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial?  Even a guilty person should be given a trial!  In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now.  The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds.  The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as  potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only.  By the way, how is that even legal in America?  It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws.  Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages!  Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution. ***(This Article May be Shared but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party)

Click the like button and leave a comment, please.  You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit   Disclaimer:  Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Thanks for the read…..

Grievance: DOJ Tracking Law Abiding Americans, but Not Cartel Members using U.S. Recovery Fund: “Hit” Lists: Missing Guns?!!

Posted on by rose4justice
Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!
Fast & Furious: Gun Sales to cartels!

written by Rose Colombo, original (c) pub.  10/19/2011

We The People exercise our constitutional right to file this Grievance and demand that the U.S. Senate follow through and appoint a Special Prosecutor in the egregious matter of Fast and Furious: a Gunrunning program launched on or about March 2009.  Thousands of murders by assassination along the borders were carried out with U.S. guns sold to ruthless criminal cartel members  between 2009 – 2011.  The victims were a majority of innocent Mexican citizens who called out to the U.S. for help, but also included law enforcement victims who were murdered by their own agency’s sale of U.S. guns sold to cartel members which is unconscionable.

Furthermore, how is it that media alleges that the executive office has enacted an assassination “hit”  list, not only against America’s enemies, but allegedly against unarmed foreigners and American citizens who President Obama (or Panetta?) decide should be included on a “hit” list without due process of law at the hand of our own government?  It is not only a sin but immoral and unethical to use taxpayer dollars to assassinate unarmed people and American citizens.  If that’s the case, why did we go to war against Saddam or attempt to assassinate Gaddafi who are said to be tyrants who assassinate their own citizens without due process of law?  A U.S. “hit” list is the same as telling Americans that they are going to pay for their possible “assassination” with their own tax dollars!

Furthermore, there is the push by this administration to disarm Americans. President Obama stated on Meet the Press in 2008:  “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

The news reports every day that Iran and other Middle East nations as well as Korea and Russia are arming themselves with nuclear weapons. In fact, China has been building up its armies and weapons for decades. So, if Americans were disarmed as the Obama and Clinton administration propose then the American people would be left defenseless against criminals or an invasion by their enemies.  It appears that the most prominent names pushing hard to disarm Americans are President Obama, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Senator Feinstein, Senator Shumer, and New York Mayor, Bloomberg, and now Homeland Security proposes laws to spy and track innocent Americans at Wal-Mart and gun stores, who purchase guns and ammunition, but didn’t RFID tag the U.S. guns sold to ruthless cartel members.  There are hundreds of missing guns!

Consequently, President Obama allegedly switched $10 million of U.S. Stimulus Money from the Recovery Fund for his program, “Fast and Furious and Gun-running.” In “Good Faith,” the  American people believed President Obama, when he promised to use the stimulus money to “create jobs.”  Instead, America’s tax dollars were turned into blood money.  The fact that missing guns are in the hands of criminals sold to them by our federal government renders every man, woman, and child on both sides of the borders potential victims.

How is it that the Obama czars,  the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,  and the Homeland  Security administration has funding and procedures in place to track legal citizens on U.S. soil, who purchase guns, but they didn’t bother to monitor and track, videotape, photograph, audio tape, and follow basic surveillance procedures when they sold U.S. guns using straw buyers to traffic guns into Mexico that were sold to cartel members on foreign soil?

We The People commend Representatives Darrel Issa and Charles Grassley.  We The People believe this is one of the biggest scandals to hit our nation.  More people have been assassinated in two years, 2009-2011 than in some wars or ethnic cleansing ordered by tyrannical leaders.

Below is a list of events involving public servants in the media who have been actively engaged in gun control legislation; the Second Amendment; the gun trafficking into  Mexico while tracking Americans buying legal guns after the lone assassin murdered and injured innocent people and Rep. Gifford in Arizona; but the federal government failed to track ruthless cartel members for two years.

The following list below is a compilation of events reported in the news relating to gun control by U.S. federal government representatives commencing in 1992:

1.  1992:  Senator Hillary Clinton supported a federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.

2.  2000:  Senator Hillary Clinton favors “sensible gun control legislation, but limiting gun control lawsuits.  She made gun licensing and registration a part of her 2000 senate campaign.  She also made strict gun control laws at the federal level part of her 2008 presidential campaign.

3.  March 24, 2003: SB 1195 – Obama votes to ban many rifles and shotguns in the U.S.

4.  March 25, 2004:  SB 2165 – Obama voted to prosecute people who use a gun for self-defense in their homes (which is law in Great Britain rendering the victims helpless against a criminal)

5.  July 29, 2005:  S 397 – Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition used for hunting and fishing

6.  September 2005:  Obama opposes the right of citizens to carry hand guns – Chicago Tribune

7.  2006:  Mayor Bloomberg helps organize a coalition of mayors to perform background checks on customers who buy guns and clerks who sell guns; videotaping the sales; and keeping a record each time the BATF and Explosive links a gun buy at other guns and the purchase flagged. [Ironically, the BATF is required by HLS to link into legal sales of law-abiding Americans, but the Obama administration didn’t tell Americans they were paying to have the  BATF sell U.S. guns purchased on U.S. soil for gun trafficking without any tracking of illegal guns or the cartel criminals]

8.  2008:  New York Times:  “Mayor and Wal-Mart Back Gun Sales Plan” – “A coalition of mayors….led by Michael R. Bloomberg of New York…said it had reached a 10 point agreement with Wal-Mart, the country’s largest seller of guns to track the sales of firearms more closely which include criminal background check of even store clerks.” [ironically, Obama and Bloomberg and Hillary want to spy on law abiding citizens and investigate U.S. citizens who purchase guns and ammunitin as well as other consumer items on U.S. soil, but they don’t care that President Obama conceals all his background records].

9. October 20, 2008:  Meet the Press – Obama said, “It’s my intention if elected to DISARM Americans to the level of acceptance to our Middle East brethren.”

10.  March 13, 2009:  Gun Ban List:  HR 1022 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and President Obama support U.N. Treaty to ban guns in the United States and by-pass the Second Amendment.

11.  L.A. Times 3/27/2009:  “U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton ending, a 2 day visit to Mexico centered heavily on the drug war toured a state of the art police center and condemned drug violence meeting with university students….This situation is intolerable for honest law-abiding citizens of Mexico, my country, or of anywhere of ‘conscience live,’ she said.”

Also, “Clinton acknowledged that the U.S. bears some blame for the crisis because of its insatiable appetite for illicit drugs and its role as a supplier of weapons that are SMUGGLED into Mexico to the cartels by ‘hit’ men.”

“President Felipe Calderon’s government applauded on Obama’s administration plan….that will place more U.S. agents and other personnel along the border.”

12.   March 2009:  Letter from senators Dick Durbin and Diane Feinstein…..” According to the ATF more than 90% of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the U.S. of A.  Feinstein added that it is unacceptable to have 90% of the guns that are picked up in Mexico to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things coming from theU.S. and I think we must put a stop to that….[the actual number of guns according to Fact Check and Fox was 17%].  They pushed for a massive new gun control and assault weapons ban.

13.  March 24, 2009: YouTube: “Obama Orders Launch of Fast & Furious”: Deputy A.G. Ogden announcing on national television that President Obama launched Fast and Furious and approved $10 million from the Stimulus Recovery Fund for the program naming Holder and Ogden to head it up.

14.  May 12, 2009, You Tube: “Did Obama Make You Laugh”- Obama said Hillary Clinton just returned from Mexico [regarding guns and drugs] and these days they’ve gotten very close and she kissed him.

15.  August 14, 2009:  CNN, Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 1:  “Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.”

16.  August 14, 2009, CNN Anderson Cooper, You Tube, Part 2:  Mexico Says Guns Coming From U.S.” – and Mexican officials state the guns coming into Mexico from the U.S. are the key problem to the assassinations.

17.  June 28, 2010:  The Washington Times reads “Dozens of U.S. Citizens may be targets of Assassination by Obama.”

18.  July 20, 2010:  The Examiner by Howard Portney read:  “Obama Assassination List: The Troubling Reality” – “In an interview last Thursday with Washington Times, John Brennan, the president’s most senior advisor on counterterrorism and Homeland Security reveals that the Obama administration maintains a list of American citizens who have been targeted for assassination.”

Although, these are considered bad men and enemies or war criminals, since when does America assassinate unarmed people and dispose of their bodies; unarmed Americans who aren’t charged with a crime and visited the Pentagon as their guest;  or attempted assassinations against foreign leaders who never threatened to attack America?

19.  May 21, 2010: The Daily Paul – “Hillary Clinton Supports the Small Arms Treaty with the Second Amendment in Jeopardy” – Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton support U.N. Treaty and may attempt to by-pass congress and ban guns in U.S.

20.  June 18, 2010, NewsMax: “Obama Administration to File Lawsuit Against Arizona’s Immigration Law” – and, “Hillary Clinton stated, ‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy.’  Clinton said in an interview.  “And, the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.”

21.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – “Obama hauls Arizona before the U.N. Human Rights Council.  The president’s first-ever report on U.S. Human Rights to the U.N. Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material….to bash Arizona’s immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over from Arizona to the U.N.

22.  August 24, 2010, ImpeachObamaCampaign.com – On Obama’s command, Attorney General, Eric Holder, has sued the State of Arizona for passing a law that he criticized without reading and which merely uphold federal law….and threatens to give sanctuary cities a pass and threatens an additional lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio for racial profiling.

23.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford Supports Gun Rights:  She opposed the Washington D.C. “Gun Ban” by signing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.

24.  August 2010:  Rep. Gifford and Secure Borders:  Gifford supports secure borders in support of Governor Brewer’s efforts and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s efforts.  She supported the passage of the bill to fund more Border Patrol agents and install surveillance technology at the borders as well as bringing in the National Guard.

25.  September 2, 2010:  Gateway Pundit – “Radical Obama Justice Department Sues Sheriff Joe Arpaio” – “The Wall Street Journal” reported – “The Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County accusing him and his agency of stonewalling a probe into policing practice that some call discriminatory against Hispanics.  [Ironically, the senate has alleged that Holder is stonewalling in providing the senators with documentation that they had subpoenaed in the case of Fast and Furious]

26.  January 8, 2011:  Assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford, who was shot in the head, by Jared Lee Laughner, a lone assassin, near Tucson, in a Safeway parking lot as she was speaking to her constituents.  Fortunately, she survived and is making a wonderful recovery according to the news.

27.  Laughner was reported to have murdered 19 people and killed six of those in attendance with one injury.  He was arrested by authorities, but like Timothy McVeigh, America’s heard very little about them.

28.  January 8, 2011:  LiteNews.com –  U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Chief Judge, John Roll, a strong Catholic man who attended Catholic schools and was pro-life.  Judge Roll was appointed by pro-life President George Bush.  He attended Mass before attending Gifford’s event and he was assassinated by Laughner.  Roll opposed taxpayer-funded abortions which was scheduled to be heard and voted upon one week after his death, but the news reported the voting had been  postponed after the assassination. Senator Obama supported mandated abortions worlwide and supports the bill he proposed and implemented into law in Dec. 2007 and signed into law as an Executive Order in January 2009 without transparency.  The mandated abortion law requiring U.S. taxpayers to pick up the world’s tab for mandated abortions through Obamacare was opposed by pro-life supporters such as Judge Roll.  Obama approved multimillions in tax dollars for abortions to Planned Parenthood which could have created many jobs for Americans rather than killing off future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens by abortion.

29. February 23, 2011 Letter:  Senator Schumer and N.Y. Mayor Bloomberg call for stricter gun control laws saying, “President Obama could accomplish some better information sharing among federal agencies by Executive Order and that he was working with them on it.”

30.   February 2011 Letter posted on-line:  Senator Diane Feinstein and Charles Schumer blame U.S. for sending military style weapons into Mexico.  “Congress has been virtually moribund while powerful Mexican drug trafficking organizations continue to gain unfettered access to military style firearms coming from the U.S.”

31.  June 2011 Letter from Senator Feinstein:  “Congress should renew the assault weapons ban which would help to prevent traffickers from obtaining the most deadly weapons now arming Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations.  This administration routinely ignores subpoenas.  The killings reached their highest levels in 2010 increasing by almost 60% to 15,273 deaths from 9,616 the previous year.”  [2009].

32.  May 23, 2011:  CNN seen on You Tube video:  Rep. Issa questions A.G. Holder at senate hearings who testified under oath that he just recently learned of Fast and Furious in the last few weeks.  [see video of 3/24/2009 with deputy A.G. Ogden)

33.  2009-2011 – Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Feinstein support the U.N. Small Arms Treaty which would disarm Americans and trample on the Second Amendment.

On or about March 20, 2011, Obama attacked Libya with an alleged assassination attempt against Gaddafi, but instead killed innocent freedom fighters and Gaddafi’s grandkids, as Gaddafi, didn’t threaten America.  On or about May 2, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed war criminal named Osama bin laden and disposed of the body.  On or about September 30, 2011, Obama ordered the assassination of an American who wasn’t charged with a crime named Al-Awaki.  Did all three assassinations by-pass congressional and constitutional law? So, how is it that there are so many assassinations such as these and the assassination of a federal judge and an attempted assassination on the life of a congressional member as well as the assassination of thousands of innocent Mexicans and some Americans murdered with America’s guns sold without tracking on foreign soil to cartel criminals paid for with U.S. tax dollars while the constitution and congressional authority appear to be “meaningless?”  These tragedies have cast a dark shadow over the federal government causing the American people to doubt the integrity of their own government as well as live in fear.

In conclusion, We The People, submit this Grievance demanding that the U.S. Congress investigate the events involving gun control and Fast and Furious Gunrunning, going back to 1992 – to-date,  as well as the authority which a president or congress is applying providing them the authority to gather a “hit” list to murder by assassination without congressional and constitutional authority, especially against unarmed persons and American citizens.  The fact that the federal government sold hundreds of guns to cartel members which are missing renders every man, woman, and child, on both sides of the borders potential victims in the present time or future.  **(This article may be shared, but Not Plagiarized by a Third Party).

The above research was gathered for educational purposes and submitted to the best of my ability and knowledge as reported for public review.  Read Reviews and complimentary page of Rose’s 2 books, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” and her latest political satire with delightful fictional characters paralleling today’s unconstitutional laws with an Orwellian flavor that leads to a thought-provoking ending, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

A Geert Wilders Speech: Message to Americans 2009: If You Missed the Warning!

Posted on by rose4justice

Posted:  2009; 9/29/2011; 4/23/2013;  01/01/2014 and11/5/2016 

Rose Colombo, award-winning author and fmr AM-FM radio host and producer and host of  former cable TV show states, “America is in a supernatural battle of good vs. evil in these volatile times.  The pendulum on the Scales of Justice is swinging far left both politically and socially.  America shall either maintain freedom or see radical ‘change.'”  I am reposting an important  speech delivered by Geert Wilders, which I received and saved  on about  2009.  At the time, I was warned that it was too dangerous to share, but I felt it was  important to saving our nation from possible danger and a high jacking of the USA! So,  I not only published it in 2009, but I saved it for people who would like to read it for the first time.  May God Protect America from anti-American enemies.Mr. Wilders wrote this letter under great threat by the European leaders, especially in Holland after terrorists attacked the Journalists.

Very scary……think 9/11…….think recent attempted destruction of one of our airliners…be aware………..

Snopes authenticates the delivery of the speech…………….


Geert  Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament.

America  as the last man standing
  
  ‘In a  generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost  Europe?’

Here is  the speech of Geert Wilders,  Chairman, Party for  Freedom, the Netherlands, at  the  Four Seasons, New  York, introducing an Alliance  of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad  Conference  in Jerusalem.

Dear friends,

Thank you  very much for inviting me.

I come to  America   with a mission.  All is not well in the old   world.  There is a tremendous danger  looming, and  it is very difficult to be  optimistic.  We might be in  the final  stages of the Islamization of Europe.  This  not only is a clear and present danger to the  future  of Europe itself, it is a threat to  America  and the  sheer survival of the West.  The United States as the  last bastion of Western civilization, facing an  Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the   situation on the ground in Europe.  Then, I will  say a few things about Islam.  To close,  I will tell you about  a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know  is changing.

You have probably seen  the landmarks.  But in all of these cities, sometimes a  few blocks away from your tourist  destination, there is  another world.  It is  the world of the parallel society  created by  Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout   Europe a new  reality is rising: entire Muslim  neighborhoods  where very few indigenous people reside or  are even seen.  And if they are, they might  regret  it.  This goes for the police as  well.  It’s the  world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless  tents, with baby strollers and a group of children.   Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk  three steps ahead.   With mosques on many street  corners.  The  shops have signs you and I cannot  read.  You will be hard-pressed to find any  economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos   controlled by religious fanatics.  These are  Muslim neighborhoods, and they are  mushrooming in every city  across Europe.  These are  the building-blocks for  territorial control of increasingly larger portions of  Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city  by city.

There are now thousands of mosques   throughout Europe .  With larger  congregations  than there are in churches.   And in every European city  there are plans to  build super-mosques that will dwarf every  church in the region.  Clearly, the signal is:  we rule.

Many European cities are already   one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and   Malmo in  Sweden.  In many cities the majority of  the  under-18 population is Muslim.  Paris is  now surrounded by a ring of Muslim  neighborhoods.   Mohammed is the most  popular name among boys in many   cities.

In some elementary schools in  Amsterdam  the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would  also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to  Muslims.

Many state  schools in Belgium and   Denmark  only serve halal food to all pupils.   In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up  almost exclusively by Muslims.  Non-Muslim women  routinely hear  ‘whore, whore’.  Satellite dishes are  not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the  country of origin.

In  France school  teachers  are advised to avoid authors deemed  offensive to Muslims,  including Voltaire and  Diderot; the same is increasingly  true of  Darwin.  The history of the Holocaust can  no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In   England sharia courts are now officially part of  the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France   are no-go areas for women without head  scarves.   Last week a man almost died after  being beaten up by  Muslims in Brussels,  because he was drinking during the   Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing  France  in  record numbers, on the run for the worst wave  of  anti-Semitism since World War II.   French is now  commonly spoken on the streets of  Tel Aviv and  Netanyahu, Israel.  I could go on forever with stories  like this.  Stories about Islamization.

A   total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in   Europe.   San Diego University  recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the   population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.   Bernhard Lewis has  predicted a Muslim majority by the  end of this century.

Now these are just  numbers.   And the numbers would not be  threatening if the  Muslim-immigrants had a  strong desire to assimilate.   But there are few signs of that.  The Pew Research   Center reported that half of French Muslims see their   loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to  France.  One-third of French Muslims do not  object to  suicide attacks.  The British  Centre for Social  Cohesion reported that  one-third of British Muslim students  are in  favor of a worldwide caliphate.   Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’.  And  this is how we give them respect.  We have  Muslim  official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic  attorney general is willing to accept sharia in  the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority.  We  have  cabinet members with passports from Morocco and  Turkey  .

Muslim demands are supported  by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and   random violence, for example against ambulance workers  and bus drivers, to small-scale  riots.  Paris has  seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the basileus.  I call the perpetrators  ‘settlers’.   Because that is what they are. They do not come to  integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our   society into their Dar-al-Islam.  Therefore, they  are settlers.

Much of  this street violence I  mentioned is directed  exclusively against non-Muslims,  forcing many  native people to leave their  neighborhoods, their cities, their countries..   Moreover,  Muslims are now a swing vote not to  be ignored.

The second thing you need to  know is  the importance of Mohammed the  prophet.  His behavior  is an example to all  Muslims and cannot be criticized.   Now, if  Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us  say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one,   there would be no problem.  But Mohammed  was a  warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and  had several  marriages – at the same time.   Islamic tradition tells  us how he fought in  battles, how he had his enemies murdered  and  even had prisoners of war executed.   Mohammed  himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of  Banu Qurayza.   If it is good for Islam, it is good.  If it is bad  for Islam, it is  bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam   being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and  a  here-after, and 72 virgins.  But in its  essence Islam  is a political ideology.  It  is a system that lays  down detailed rules for  society and the life of every  person.   Islam wants to dictate every aspect of   life.  Islam means ‘submission’.   Islam is  not compatible with freedom and  democracy, because what it  strives for is sharia.  If you want to compare Islam  to anything, compare it to communism  or national-socialism, these are all  totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston   Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde  force in  the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.   The public has  wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian   narrative, and sees Israel  as the aggressor.  I  have lived in this  country and visited it dozens of times.   I support Israel.  First,  because it is the Jewish homeland  after two thousand years  of exile up to and  including Auschwitz, second because it is  a democracy, and third because Israel is our first  line  of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault  line of jihad, frustrating  Islam’s territorial advance.    Israel is facing  the front lines of jihad, like  Kashmir, Kosovo,  the Philippines,  Southern Thailand,  Darfur in Sudan,  Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia.   Israel  is simply in the way.  The same  way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The  war  against Israel is not a  war against Israel.  It is a  war against the West.  It is jihad.  Israel is  simply receiving the blows that are meant for  all of us.   If there would have been no  Israel, Islamic  imperialism would have found other venues to release its  energy and its desire for  conquest.  Thanks to Israeli  parents who  send their children to the army and lay awake  at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well  and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in  Europe argue in favor of  abandoning Israel  in order to  address the grievances of our Muslim  minorities.  But  if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring  any  solace to the West It would not mean our  Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their   behavior, and accept our values.  On the   contrary, the end of Israel  would give enormous  encouragement to the forces  of Islam.  They would, and  rightly so, see  the demise of Israel  as proof that the  West is weak, and  doomed.  The end of Israel   would not mean the end of our problems with  Islam, but  only the beginning.  It would  mean the start of the  final battle for world  domination.  If they can get   Israel  , they can get everything.  So-called   journalists volunteer to label any and all  critics of  Islamic [indoctrination] as a ‘right-wing  extremists’ or ‘racists’.   In my country,  the Netherlands  , 60 percent of  the population now sees the mass  immigration of Muslims as  the number one policy  mistake since World War II.  And  another 60  percent sees  Islam as the biggest threat.   Yet there is a danger  greater danger than  terrorist attacks, the scenario of   America  as the last man standing.  The lights may   go out in Europe faster than you can  imagine.  An  Islamic Europe means a Europe  without freedom and democracy,  an economic  wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss   of military might for America  – as its allies will  turn into enemies, enemies  with atomic bombs.  With an  Islamic Europe,  it would be up to America alone to   preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and  Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most  precious  of gifts.  My generation never had  to fight for this  freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people  who fought for it  with their lives.  All throughout   Europe,  American cemeteries remind us of the young  boys  who never made it home, and whose memory  we cherish.  My generation does not own this   freedom; we are merely its custodians.  We can only  hand over this hard won liberty to  Europe’s children in  the same state in which it was offered to us.  We cannot  strike a deal  with mullahs and imams.  Future  generations  would never forgive us.  We cannot squander  our liberties.  We simply do not have the right to  do so.”

GEERT WILDERS

We  have to  take the necessary action now to stop  this Islamic strategic goal as written and stated to destroy the free world without dropping a nuke, but through illegal migration..
Please take  the time to read and  understand what is written  here, Please send it to every  free person that  you know, it is so  very important.  [The Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR is not a friend of Western Civilization. The written and stated strategic goal of the Muslim Brotherhood-CAIR organization is to invade, infiltrate, overpopulate and dominate. They intend as written and stated to infiltrate government on all levels, schools, universities, and churches. Their stated weapon is to overpopulate and dominate each city, county, then state like in Minnesota. The Muslim Brotherhood strategic written and stated goals in published in the Muslim Brotherhood book entitled, “The Project.” They use their radicalized females it appears to stir up hate for the President of the USA and the White House as witnessed in their speeches.  They use females to lead American women’s marches and encourage the America’s young females to abort their natural-born babies needed to preserve America.  The Left under Obama imposed same-sex indoctrination and transgender lifestyles  under the guise of education which are depopulation programs of future natural-born Americans.

In fact, I warned the Democrat Congress and Senate including my own reps by writing the First Blog in the nation prior to their vote on Obamacare entitled,”Obamacare is unconstitutional and illegal” and warned of death panels for Americans by euthanizing Americans chronically ill or elderly and paying for a consumer product with our own earned money after taxes that we may or may not want to buy that would be rationed or denied to Americans which are death panels and depopulation for Americans only because Obama and Congress exempted themselves, donors, and illegals and Muslims.

After Obama was slipped into office in 2009 with the blessings of Holder and the Clinton’s, McCain,Soros, Bush’s, the Democrats cared less that Obama couldn’t provide a vetted Certified U.S. Birth Certificate which is required to be a U.S. President or a U.S. Senator, but it apparently, it was all about the money – stimulus money – funneling tax dollars – and making deals with foreign nations and even foreign enemy nations. Much of the stimulus money went to radiate Americans which is a death panel as well as to donors such as Mr.Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, billionaire George Soros, IMF, Muslim Brotherhood leaders  such as Morsi and Odinga and Planned Parenthood and the migrations of radicals and illegals into the USA.

Obama and Holder concealed  Obama’s true identification, Military Registration if any, Repatriation papers if any, Indonesian Citizenship, Kenyan Birth Certificate, and foreign student body card and loan, Law License, and all Credentials from the American citizens. Obama and Holder inserted instructions into President Bush’s existing Presidential Order making it impossible for anyone to review anything without the permission of Obama and Holder.

After Justice John Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit filed by Philip J. Berg, esq., prior to the inauguration in January 2009, his decision appears to me to be extremely careless, but I guess he thought, “What difference at this point, does it make? 

I wrote to Justice Roberts and each Justice in support of attorney Berg’s  eligibility lawsuit based on We The People’s and stated that We are the Government and have “Standing” because we pay the wages of the POTUS and all public servants. We The People are entitled to vet the candidates in exchange for votes and taxpayer funded wages with benefits.  I explained in my letter that if  Justice Roberts refused to hear the eligibility lawsuit that he could be setting a very bad precedent in the future that could lead to foreign spies, illegals, enemies of the USA, and cartels or terrorists accessing the highest office in the land. I was correct.

Apparently, Justice Roberts didn’t care because he denied the eligibility lawsuit. And, today, California’s Governors Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s nephew, opened the borders to illegals and jihadist, cartels and gangs, by denying ICE and Border Patrol the right to inspect the illegals entering into California who bypassed legal Ports of Entry.  Brown and Newsom and their Democrat administration are not being removed by the DOJ for aiding and abetting, harboring, and materially assisting illegals inside the USA but rewarding the illegals and fake or real Refugees/asylum seekers with U.S. American tax dollars earned by hard-working legal Americans who pay their wages to uphold the law, not violate the law.  Illegal means Illegal and that word is defined to describe a criminal in the U.S. Law books – all of the U.S. Law Books!  This appears to me that the Democrats may have pledged their allegiance to secret international entities or persons or societies. 

Govs. Brown Family and the Pelosi Family have ruined California while they’ve made themselves wealthy living off taxpayers. Speaker Nancy Pelosi engaged in Insider Trading with windfalls in the millions and called it legal while Martha Stewart went to jail. She was creating her wealthy Family Dynasty!  In fact, the same people have been running the Democrat Congress and California for 20-40 years or more….running it into the ground from the most wealthy Golden State in the union to the most impoverished state that turned the Golden Gate City of San Francisco into a ghetto.

Governors Brown and Newsom care less about legal Americans, they only care about turning California into a foreign nation so did Hillary Clinton give California away to China or Mexico?  It’s been reported that many illegals and refugees stated they came to the USA because they were promised freebies paid by the taxpayers. They promised the illegals and fake or real asylum seekers that the Americans would pick up their lifetime tab for Obamacare, living expenses, Drivers Licenses, and even allow illegals to run for public office!  Fortunately, Brown is gone and Newsom is facing 2,000,000 signatures demanding he be Recalled as Governor of California. It can’t be soon enough.

Obama was quick in 2009 right after the inauguration to inform 330,000,000 Americans that “America is no longer a Christian nation.”  He said that America would be changed and “transformed” in the next 5 days.  He stated that the U.S. Constitution was”meaningless” and Congress was “meaningless” and he would use his Blackberry and pen to sign E.O.’s into law bypassing the congressional legislatures who are elected to write the laws, not Obama.

I will never forget the Obama speech in CAIRO when Obama aka Barry Soetoro shocked everyone and spoke to the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in perfect Arabic and stated that he knows….because he is “one of them.  On that day, he promised the Muslims two states.  I still recall thinking if he was promising them Europe and America.

Furthermore, not long after that CAIRO speech, he flew off to Germany and didn’t address America or Americans, he said, “People of the World.”  Apparently, he believed he was the One World Leader rising up. He also immediately flew to Canada and Mexico to speak to the Presidents in those 2 countries where the preplanned secret radicals would be entering to come into the USA it appears.

Obama and Hillary Clinton’s secret pre planned migration of Somalians and Palestinians linked to the MB-CAIR-Hamas-Hezbollah organizations were flown into the USA late at night by their orders and taxpayer funded DHS buses were being used to scatter them around the country. Obama and Hillary Clinton diverted U.S. Tax Dollars (stimulus) and used  U.S. Refugee Centers to  push through as many radicals as possible each day for 8 years before the funding ran out. The whistleblowers stated they did little or no vetting.

It appears the radicals were promised free everything even if they were polygamist, healthy and able to work, with several wives and dozens of kids.  Polygamy and Bigamy and Incest are serious crimes int he USA, but  the Democrats cared less that this is a violation of U.S. Laws.  Obama and the Democrats didn’t care because they were working overtime to change and transform for USA into a foreign nation of illegals and radicals. Obama repeatedly met in secret many times with the Muslim Brotherhood leaders for 8 years in the White House. He promised the radicals from foreign enemy nations that they would receive free housing, health care, SNAP Food credit, education and he approved a Hate Crimes Bill that discriminates against Americans, Christians, Jews, and patriots who are accused of offending the foreigners.  This is a discriminatory bill and should be voided now! 

Obama allowed the radicals to set up what is called no-go zones on American soil – our Homeland. The  Democrats and RINOS cared less about anything Obama and Holder and Hillary and their Democrat regime didn’t care what they weren’t doing for America, but what they were doing to America, and for themselves. We are no different than Europe during WWII.  We are no different than Europeans currently watching Macron and Merkel, Belgium and Sweden, New Zealand selling out their natural-born citizens and Homeland to radicals from across the oceans. I

If Americans don’t wake up to the truth and protect and stand with President Donald J.Trump and unite as loyal Natural Born or loyal generational naturalized Americans and demand our borders are secured and that Detain and Deport is Restored they win. We must Demand that the Republic is restored and operated by the established constitutional laws that protect the borders and legal Americans who own their Homeland and are required by law to defend it from foreign and domestic enemies.  

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Is Sharia Law Approved on US Soil And Prohibited by U.S. Constitutional Law an act of Treason against the United States?

Posted on by rose4justice
Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!
Christianity vs. Chrislam and God vs. Socialism!

Rose Colombo, (c) 4/25/2011, rev. 8/25/2011, 4/9/2012, 7/4/2013, 3/9/2015

How then shall the United States of America be protected from infiltration and tyranny by foreign anti-American enemies if the Rule of Law governed by a Republic is not upheld?  Therefore, one must determine what is the definition of the word Law.  Well, according to the legal definition, it is as follows:  “The regime that orders human activities and relations through systematic application of the force of politically organized society or through social pressure backed by force, in such a society the legal system…the accepted legal principles, the body of authoritative grounds of judicial and administrative action, esp. the body of rules and principles that the courts of a particular jurisdiction apply in deciding the law of the land.”

In this definition laid out in Black’s Law, I find it of particular interest that the authors used the word “regime” not administrators.  The fact remains that laws are intended for all people to follow, not secretly inserted, but transparent.  This is to prevent a regime from changing U.S. Constitutional laws to a foreign set of laws by unethical  lawmakers  who may be intent on changing existing laws into foreign laws and implementing a foreign “regime.”  Also, the law of the land in America is defined in the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.  Americans have Rights, which are guaranteed and established in the Bill of Rights,  And, legislatures seek the definition of U.S. laws in a book titled, the  Law of Nations.

Sharia Law states it is a Law.  And, it is a foreign Law!  The U.S. Constitution clearly prohibits any and all foreign law to be inserted or established on U.S. soil by any U.S. Citizen or public servant, period.  It is called “Treason.”  Sharia Law is the law of foreign nations, established in Egypt, Africa, and countries across the Middle East.  Its reported that Sharia has been established as a second regime in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain, as well.  The experts on Sharia state that  Sharia is made up of many divided sects or groups of various beliefs, but  all Muslims remain believers under Sharia Law.  It’s reported that Sharia law has many religious leaders, Imams, who speak out around the world and their stated goal is to establish Sharia throughout the world and dominate.

Many experts on Sharia Laws explain that Sharia Law incorporates the ideologies of government with religious beliefs under the umbrella set of laws known as Sharia Law which bonds politics and religion together as one and they cannot be separated.  Sharia is in opposition to U.S. Constitutional law and Christianity as well as  Catholicism and the religious beliefs established by Israel.  The  U.S. Constitution is a political law separated from  church and state and provides freedom of religion in America.  In other words,  Sharia Law incorporates political laws with religious laws and molds them together as one “law,” which is in opposition to the Constitution of the United States whose established laws allow for political law and religious law to be practiced peacefully and separately.  Also, established religions who practice foreign religions on U.S. soil must support the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the USA, not to foreign laws or foreign nations or foreign leaders with the intent of secretly shredding the  Constitution of the United States and replace Western Civilization  with Sharia Law.  And, there lies a major difference.  The major difference between Western Civilization and Sharia Law is  the separation of church and state, which makes Sharia Law incompatible with Western Civilization.

In America, the government and religion are two separate entities, but there are many separate religions and the American people are free to choose which religion, if any, they will follow.  In fact, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the U.S. federal and state government leaders from interfering in religious freedom and separation of church and state. But, the federal government, who is granted “limited” power by the Constitution of the United States has over stepped its “limited” powers and its Big Foot appears to be trampling on the separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and the entire U.S. Constitution as Americans witness their leaders, who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution, shred it!

On the other hand, Sharia Law states that it is a “Law” and all laws established in a nation must be adhered to or else people can be punished by their governments under the laws of that particular land.  There are governments and religions, who punish their people severely, which in America is called a violation against humanity and it is a crime to harm another human being. For example, forcing all girls to be circumcised is not acceptable or legal in Western Civilization.  It’s not legal to abuse one’s family as a form of punishment for their personal actions based on religious beliefs.  Appropriate discipline is acceptable by Christianity, but not physical and mental abuse.

Many experts state that Sharia Law is a political Law which incorporates not only religion, but also lifestyle, clothing, food,  and philosophical beliefs and controls and oppresses the will of women and children.  But, in America, a majority of  U.S. citizens are concerned about their leaders who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, but appear to be upholding foreign laws in U.S. courts and secretly inserting foreign history into U.S. history books, or inserting foreign religions into Christian churches.  Has Congress secretly inserted foreign Sharia law into Obamacare, page 107, taking it to a new federal level?   Strict Sharia laws require all women wear the same clothing and requires that citizens eat certain foods and that they praye on a regular basis during the day, so can you imagine what that would do to businesses, clothing manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers around the world? Remember, the Middle East is not a Industrial Complex as built by Western Civilization.  We’re not just talking religion and politics, we’re talking about destroying a world of free enterprise and capitalism in the free world including the food industry!

For example, in the state of Michigan, there has been much controversy in the news of Christians and Christian pastors being arrested on U.S. soil for holding Christian pamphlets, bibles, or speaking to people about Christianity, near a Muslim event on U.S. soil.  Should we not ask  if the Muslims who come to America are Americans then how can Christians or Pastors be arrested for speaking to other Americans?   If some Muslims or other foreigners migrating into the  U.S. and are given the privilege of being a U.S. Citizen, but their intent is to overthrow Western Civilization,  then they have committed perjury and a fraud on America and they should be deported.  Ironically, foreigners migrate into America and swear an oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the U.S. Constitution and pledge their allegiance to the United States of America. Yet, Americans in many cases appear in the news to be the targets of government and  discriminated against for walking on public sidewalks near a Muslim event, even though American tax dollars paid for the public sidewalks, so the American people could walk upon them freely.  In D.C., the government prohibits taxpayers from standing in certain areas on public sidewalks which is stunning, yet they are silent when certain groups block public buildings, sidewalks or streets with their foreign prayers, which can cause a hazard, the loss of business, as its the law that streets and sidewalks must be accessible for emergencies and to avoid civil unrest.

In fact, a recent on-line news reporter and a law firm stated that Sharia Law includes page 107 that establishes the word Dhimmitudes and secretly inserted into ObamaCare.  It’s stunning that the Supreme Court approved 2700 pages of unread laws by a congressional body who failed in their fiduciary duty to read the laws, debate the laws, or follow the Rule of Law required by the 14th Amendment as their fiduciary duty.  In fact, many Americans are asking why wasn’t this alleged secret insertion of Sharia Law of Dhimmitude disclosed to the American people and why is a foreign law inserted into an American national health care bill?  If Congress allows this foreign law to stand on U.S. soil, how are they not being removed from office by We The People for secretly inserting foreign laws on U.S. soil and not stripped  from their titles by We The People?

It’s common sense that foreign laws inserted into U.S. federal health care laws would lead to the diminishing of U.S. law, even though Americans aren’t bound by foreign laws because foreign laws are prohibited from being established on U.S. soil which make it clear that the constitution renders such persons to be that of a Benedict Arnold and  to be committing acts of sedition, traitors, or committing Treason.  Therefore, the American people must address this issue with their congressman immediately and not let it slip by.  The only alternative is to walk like an Egyptian on D.C.!

Is it possible that if a foreign law is inserted into a U.S. Health Care Bill that there will be more mandates, requirements, penalties, fines, jail, punishment, and excessive regulations, which targets American Citizens only?  Doesn’t such action appear to deny U.S. Citizens their right to  freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, while the oval office and Congress unconstitutionally exempt themselves from Obamacare laws and if the foreign law is inserted, they are exempting themselves from the foreign law which they approved, while throwing the American people under the bus?

The news reported and alleged that Obama and Hillary sent billions of U.S. Tax Dollars to the Palestinian Refugees linked to Hamas so Obama could migrate about 12,000,000 or more Palestinian Refugees into the USA and require Americans to pick up the tab for their housing, food, and Obamacare.  This would explain Page 107 of Obamacare making American citizens what the foreign Sharia law refers to as “dhimmitudes” or their slaves!  I guess we should inquire if this would make President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, their hero and the hero of the Muslim Brotherhood and elevate him to their glory.

The radical Muslims have no tolerance for non-compliance, just like the Communist have no tolerance for non-compliance.  It’s their way or the highway!  Anyone can watch them spew their disdain for God, Western Civilization, Capitalism, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Americans, by threatening to dominate and wipe Western Civilization off the face of the map in writings and on the internet, television news and You Tube videos which they post quite often.  The truth is the world would be much worse off if it hadn’t been for the innovation, manufacturing jobs, and military defenses built on U.S. soil by Americans.

Sharia Law – does not state – Sharia Religion!  It states what it is – Sharia Law.  A LAW!  In fact, I’ve read that the Muslim or Islamic religion has many sects and branches established across the Middle East making it impossible to know who is who since their religion allows them to lie to reach their goal of dominating the world.  One of the groups, which migrated into the U.S. hit the news and they were labeled as terrorists, but Obama said they were to be called enemy combatants, and then war criminals and then radicals, even though they declared war on America on 911 and continue to threaten Western Civilization.  The radicals killed 3,000 Americans.  They destroyed billions of dollars in property damage and destroyed American airplanes and killed the passengers for their cause. They destroyed a 100 year-old  Greek landmark church that Bloomberg refused approve and his city council for restoration.  They damaged the Pentagon.  They terrorized a nation, and caused additional American deaths of citizens who breathed in the toxic poisons from the smoke.  Many 911 witnesses  who came forward and testified about  what they saw and experienced were later on reported to be found dead as well. There hasn’t been any apology or offer of reparation for the damages, but more threats in the wind.  Recently, terrorists killed 4 Americans at Benghazi and terrorized a staff who escaped after being left by the White House to fend for themselves.

Americans don’t have a problem with Middle East leaders promoting  Sharia Law on their soil in the Middle East.  They don’t have a problem with peaceful Muslims practicing their religion in their mosques on U.S. soil, but the majority of Americans have a problem when public servants attempt to secretly insert foreign laws into U.S. state and federal laws and spy on Americans, but exempt mosques and Muslims.  They have a problem when public servants take donations in exchange that they’ll insert Islamic studies into U.S. history books.  The Americans have a problem when the government favors foreigners over the U.S. Citizens and deny  freedom, liberty, and rights to Americans, but  exempt foreigners from the laws they mandate or from punishment for their crimes.

Consequently, Americans realize that it’s not possible to interchange the word “law” with the word “religion.”  Most religions established in every nation around the world have their own set of  religious laws under their established religions, but religious laws are not  political “Laws,” but separate laws in America.  Religion is dictated by political leaders in America and people are free to join or leave at any time.  Therefore, the American people aren’t under any threat of punishment for non-compliance by their government for failing to comply with a particular religion nor are they physically or financially punished, or thrown into jail, beheaded, hung, or stoned for refusing to comply with a religious organization.  And, therein lies the difference between the U.S. Constitution and anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israeli foreign laws from Sharia Law which incorporate their religion into their political ideologies and requires strict compliance or else stiff punishment.  The belief of bonding religion and freedom as one ideology which includes religion, clothing, food.  Sharia Law is not compatible with Western Civilization, but clashes with the Jude-Christian Constitutional laws and Western Civilization and if it did dominate would wipe out Western Civilization forever.

The definition of Law versus the definition of Religion:

In order to understand the difference between the “law” and “religion” one must understand their meaning and intent and purpose.  The Law defines “Religion” as follows:  “A system of faith and worship usually involving ‘belief’ in a supreme being and usually containing a moral or ethical code…practiced by a church, sect or denomination…in construing the protections under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, courts have interpreted the term religion quite broadly to include a wide variety of theistic and non-theistic beliefs.”

Therefore, as stated by Law, there is a huge distinction between the word “law” and the word “religion” and when the two words are complicated by the federal government who attempt to mesh them together knowing the two words should never marry and become one or replaced by foreign ideologies for they know it would destroy a free nation.  If Sharia Law were to be established in the USA by traitors in public office than expect enslavement of a nation, punishment for those who refuse to comply or even indefinite detention or death, reduced population of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, and the extinction of the Middle Class and Western Civilization.

The American people should be burning up the telephone wires asking their Congressman why is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude  inserted into a U.S. National Health Care umbrella law on page 107. ?  And, why does a health care law include  2,700 pages of mandates targeted at Americans regarding their businesses and bank accounts?  Dhimmitude is about enslavement and that’s exactly what ObamaCare does, it enslaves Americans and punishes Americans.  It uses programs to reduce the population of future  U.S. Natural Born citizens by brainwashing American women into believing it’s not murder, it’s a woman’s right to abort their babies.  Yet the foreigners intentionally over-populate for they understand that through over-population, they can dominate other nations and its with numbers that they can control the world.  The foreigners don’t abort their babies or take contraceptives, but the young girls are used as baby machines for world domination.

Unfortunately, many immigrants, legal or illegal are using U.S. Constitutional laws against the American people and businesses.  And, many get fee waivers and Public Defenders or Pro-Bono attorneys, so the losers are the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, who have to pick up the legal fees when anyone attempts to sue  American businesses using Sharia law, or any other foreign law.  What if Catholics challenged the legal system and wanted to remain under the laws of the Catholic Church or the believers of the Mormon church decided to establish their religious laws as the laws of the land? More than likely, they would be denied such protection, so why isn’t Sharia Law denied in some states and cities in the United States?  In fact, pubic servants in Kentucky just violated the US Constitution, in my opinion, and according to the news approved Sharia laws in their state.  People who want to live by Sharia Law or any other foreign laws should move to the Middle East.

Of course, there are appointed federal activist judges who will boldly defend a foreign law in a U.S. courtroom, but they are not constitutionalists, nor do they believe in the strict Rule of Law, but believe in using the law to make law on the bench or change or usurp the U.S. Constitution.  Activist Liberal Judges hold themselves above the law of the land and have written laws granting judges immunity from prosecution.

Furthermore, under which constitutional authority or job duty are U.S. judges or politicians applying that provides them the authority to consider, acknowledge, or recognize a foreign law as legal or constitutional on U.S. soil except by their own failure to uphold their sworn oaths?   Remember, all public servants swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and pledged their allegiance to the U.S. flag.  Again,  Sharia Law states  exactly what it is – it is what it is – and as it is  written – a “Law” – a “foreign law” – and all  laws are written with the intent that all citizens must comply with a foreign religion against their will and foreign laws against their will or else face punishment by law enforcers of foreign laws.  Every Public Servant is required by the Rule of Law to follow the Rule of Law, but today’s public servants grant themselves immunity from the law, exempt themselves from the law, and hold themselves above the law, so how is any of that legal?   How is it that lawmakers are granting themselves the authority to be law breakers for only criminals exempt themselves from the law!  Could it be that the majority of lawyers working as public servants who call themselves lawmakers are law breakers?

Treason:  “The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either to making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies.  Also termed high treason – Cf. Sedition,” defined in Black’s dictionary.   (Note:  Please feel free to share, but not change the content or use it without giving credit to the writer.  It’s unethical to ignore the laws of  plagiarism) 

If you find Rose’s BLogs N Radio Shows of interest, please help keep the information, books, radio shows alive and running by donating even $2 through PayPal using any credit card as listed below – Rose Colombo has helped thousands of victims around the nation become survivors of legal abuse – Much Appreciated

Preview Image  Donations Appreciated for research, writing, books, and radio shows

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HM5V4XK5J8EP4

Rose Colombo, author, Legal and Political Activist and Advocate for justice invites readers to visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com and read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her Award Winning Book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire readers call “outstanding”  with humorous fictional characters and an Orwellian story with a thought-provoking ending for mankind, “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

Obama: First President in History To Increase U.S. Debt From $13T to $14Trillion in 7 Months!

Posted on by rose4justice
King Obama says, "Eat Cake, America!"
King Obama says, “Eat Cake, America!” Rose Colombo, original (c) July 14, 2011. rev. 1/12/2014

Rose Colombo, 7/14/2011, rev. 1/12/2014

Under which Job Description or Constitutional Authority does the non-vetted U.S. President, Barack Hussein Obama, applying that would grant him or Congress the authority to cut Social Security, which is a mandated Retirement Savings since the money does not belong to Obama or Congress, but to the U.S. Citizens who paid into the Retirement Savings?  Social Security has been pilfered for years and millions or billions missing without accountability removed by the federal government.  Which constitutional authority applies that would justify punishing senior citizens and forcing them into possible homelessness by stealing their money?  After all, the federal government who lived off these seniors for years and still live off the taxpayers were promised that their earnings would be returned upon retirement?  Social Security is not an Entitlement Program, so if,  Obama and Congress were to deny millions of Seniors their earnings were safe and wouldbe returned upon retirement and if not, explain how Obama’s denying or cutting Social Security which isn’t an entitlement program any  different from Grand Theft or a Ponzi Scheme?

Cut the Spending!  Those three words are not pleasant-sounding to the ears of President Obama!  He is the Print and Spend President.  Obama made history as the president who increased the national debt within seven months to the highest level ever from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion in December 2010!  Where’s the 350,000 shovel ready jobs Obama promised?

One lucky guy was George Kaiser, Obama’s bundler, who Obama granted $40,000,000 in US tax stimulus dollars and told his audience at a meeting that he was going back for more because the White House [Obama] was shoveling more money out of the door than any president in history and America would never see that again – and guess what – he went back for more and Obama granted George Kaiser, co-owner of Solyndra, an additional $535,000,000 more!  And, the U.S. Solyndra employed workers lost their jobs afterwards; and Solyndra’s executives were reported to take out huge bonuses and wages before they bankrupted Solyndra! And, that’s on the backs of the U.S. Natural Born hard-working Americans!  I read an article that stated American taxpayers were ordered to pay about $14M to cover the costs of those who lost their jobs.

So, instead of the executive office and congress acknowledging that social security funds were misused by congress, they continue to point the finger at the recipients of social security who worked for 20 – 60 years and were forced to by the federal government to contribute to social security from each pay check. The federal government removed the money from the paychecks of the seniors and veterans during their work years, which the government  promised to save as a retirement fund, and deposit into a “Trust” fund.  If seniors had been allowed to deposit their earnings into an IRA or a CD or a savings or 401K for 20 – 60 years, they would have earned interest and wouldn’t be at the mercy of the federal government and would have access to their own money.  Social Security does not belong to President Obama or to the Congress, but to the American Retirees!

Remember, if Americans were allowed to invest their earnings into an interest bearing retirement account versus the Federal Government demanding that they pay into a mandated Federal Retirement Account, it stands to reason that their retirement savings would have increased substantially and they would have control of their retirement savings. Instead, what began as a voluntary system by the federal government turned into a mandatory tax, but in reality, retirement savings isn’t a tax. The federal government made seniors and veterans dependent upon the federal government through the social security program and the government which is socialism.

In fact, the federal government took away the independence of seniors and the federal government is their parent who decides how much seniors can earn or receive from their social security savings each month.  The government doesn’t pay interest on the earnings they pilfer from seniors, but Obama threatens to deny social security checks to seniors, veterans, and military families. Seniors are paying double taxes on social security money. Taxes were already removed from their earnings and then the government calls the social security payment a tax and then they tax the social security again once they begin receiving it. This is the same as Obama-Care.  Americans forced to pay-up-front for services not rendered and may never be rendered and then after the people’s money is diverted like usual, healthcare will be denied or rationed and people will die in my opinion.

In 2008, Congress opened the purse strings containing $5 Trillion in taxpayer money and one might say gifted it to President Obama!  No strings attached or accountability for his “redistribution” of America’s wealth.  The stimulus funds resulted in more tax dollars spent than any president redistributed in 235 years.  The $5 trillion granted to Obama as stimulus funding did not stimulate the economy, but it exceeded the amount owed on the national debt or owed to China.  Today, the Obama administration hasn’t created any new jobs. The Clinton’s and Obama outsourced jobs to Communist China including solar jobs.  It’s small businesses that create more jobs.  Instead,  Obama created more government  jobs and didn’t provide loans so small businesses could expand, but instead created more regulations and punishments.

Now, Obama is fear mongering by targeting the most vulnerable of our society, the baby boomers, seniors, veterans and the disabled. What sort of person elected to public office threatens the vulnerable of society who were ripped off by their government?  Baby boomers and seniors worked most of their lives and paid taxes.  Seniors and veterans helped make this country great and weren’t welfare recipients.  Social security is money earned, not welfare.  Not only is Obama’s  threat immoral but disrespectful to every American citizen who worked for their living.  So, one must wonder if  Obama has disdain for seniors, veterans, and the disabled as well as the unborn?

Furthermore, the housing crisis affected jobs and it devastated the home building industry and real estate.  Many Baby Boomers are forced to retire early because the group which Obama funded and mentored known as Acorn pressured congress.  In turn, congress pressured the banks and ordered the bankers to issue fraudulent loans. Social Security is not a welfare or entitlement program, but a promised retirement fund.  Americans were led to believe that their earnings, which the government removed from their paychecks,  was deposited into a “Trust” Account.

Actually, isn’t it considered a crime to remove money from a “Trust” Account without the permission of the owners since earnings are private property?  How is diverting  the retirement money removed from the paychecks of U.S. citizens  considered ethical?  How was it ethical for the federal government to threaten seniors and veterans by stating that Obama may not reimburse the social security savings owed to seniors or veterans if the GOP didn’t agree to his budget? Americans should ponder how denying social security is any  different from a Ponzi Scheme perpetrated by Made-Off, oops, I mean Madoff.  Madoff was prosecuted for diverting his clients’ retirement funds which he promised to invest after the clients discovered that their investments had been diverted.

Also, an excessive number of prisons throughout the country have been built at taxpayers expense since the Clinton administration, instead of factories, which would have provided jobs, but U.S. factories and jobs have been outsourced by our presidents to Communist China and India. It’s a fact that high unemployment creates more crime. Prisons generate about $60 billion in tax revenues each year, which is excessive, yet, they are arresting more people in the U.S. than any country in the world making the prison system unaffordable.  In fact, there are projections that under the NDAA law, more Americans could be indefinitely detained in the future if Obama is re-elected.  Yet, the Clinton and Obama administration cut back on NASA, Defense, and education funding.

So, are they creating the Prison Industrial Complex and about to use every American man, woman, and child as human commodities for profit – to fill the prison beds – after all, they’re creating so many laws – and denying due process of law – how can an American win against a dealer who is stacking the deck?

In fact, outsourcing jobs to China and India helped create an increase of unemployment in America.   President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs, technology, and businesses to Communist China as well as Obama.  Clinton opened the borders and signed NAFTA.  China and India are employing more people and building more factories thanks to the Clinton’s and Obama who catapulting Communist China’s economic status as a potential economic super power. How is it that the Clinton’s and Obama are so dedicated to outsourcing U.S. jobs to a Communist Nation instead of channeling that same energy into the U.S.?

About 1993, Communist China threatened to blow Los Angeles off the face of the map. .  On the other hand, Soros is alleged to be one of Obama’s primary donors and supporters.  Soros strategic stated goal is to devalue the U.S. dollar and help build the economic status of Communist China which congress should be addressing.

Furthermore, wars cost billions of tax dollars.  Recently Obama attacked Libya without the approval of congress at a cost to the taxpayers ranging between $600,000 to $1.4 million per tomahawk.  Obama fired off 221 tomahawks  – multiply 221 x $600,000 – $1.4 million at taxpayer’s expense and figure out the additional hefty debt to the American people.  Obama ordered the firing off of the tomahawks without congressional authority during a deep recession according to the news.  He created a fourth war at taxpayer’s expense cleverly referring to his act as a “mission.” Imagine how many U.S. jobs could have been created if those same U.S. tax dollars had been redistributed to small businesses.

Therefore, I’ve gathered some information relating to the National Debt.  For example, did you know that the Total Debt per Citizen in 2011 is $176,281 and the Total Debt per family is $669,103 and the Total Savings per Family is only $6,953.  Think about that!

How is it that the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078 in 1959, which was only 50 years ago and reported at a startling $5,656,270,901,615 in 1999 while Clinton was president.  In 2004, the national debt was reported at $7,379,052,696,330. Bush was said to have started his presidency with a surplus, but he managed to substantially increase the national debt within 8 years reported at $10 trillion dollars when he left office in 2008.  Although, Obama promised not to raise taxes and support small businesses, increase jobs, and stimulate the economy, he did not.

But, Obama made history.  Not only was he the first 1/2 white and 1/2 Black U.S. President, but he kept none of his promises and he skyrocketed the U.S. National debt with in 24 months to a whopping $14 trillion!  He’s the first U.S. President who has managed to increase the national debt within 7 months from $13 trillion in June 2010 to $14 trillion by December 31, 2010.

Obama appointed U.S. Attorney General, Erick Holder.  Holder commented that the American people will be “polarized” in the future and that the change coming will be that the American people won’t recognize the face of their own nation, so is a part of the polarization coming from this administration including the polarization of seniors and veterans, the sick, and the challenged?

Although, everyone is told by the media and the federal government that China is the biggest threat to America if the U.S. defaults on the national debt, I believe the biggest threat to America are public servants who are in bed with Wall Street and are using U.S. citizens as commodities for profit through global agendas by funding private corporations of billionaires like Soros through employees of the federal government such as Michael Chertoff and his Rapiscan business with stimulus tax dollars, prisons, Obama-care, Planned Parenthood; and denying Americans the right to collect rain water, while the wealthy are allegedly buying up the water reservoirs, and destroying the farms.

Therefore, let me ask and answer who owns the U.S. National Debt?  China owns 21.09%; Japan owns 20.4% or nearly an equal share along with China; and the remaining U.S. Debt is owned by other nations in the world at 58.51%.

The business owners and politicians don’t talk about the debt as related to the outsourcing of jobs to China and India as a major reason America is out of work.  The U.S. National debt has doubled since Clinton was elected into office and he and Hillary were the catalysts who worked with Wal-Mart and COSCO (the largest communist Chinese importers into the U.S.) to import more products made in China than any other retailer in the U.S.A.  Because of the Clinton’s efforts, U.S. consumers rarely see “Made in the U.S.A.,” any longer.  President Clinton outsourced U.S. jobs and U.S. technology to Communist China along with globalist corporations.  He opened the borders and signed NAFTA making it easy for retailers like Wal-Mart and COSCO skyrocket in sales of products made in China instead of Made in the U.S.A.  Hillary Clinton introduced universal healthcare and now Hillary-Care has morphed into Obama-Care against the will of the American people for a second time, which could create an economic collapse in the future.

In 1959, the National Debt was at $284,705,907,078.  Under, Clinton, the national debt increased substantially in 8 years.  By 1999, the National Debt was at $5,656,270,,901,615.  In 2004 under Bush, the National Debt increased and read $7,379,052,696,330, but by 2008, the debt as I stated was at $10 trillion.  But, the U.S. Historical National Debt record and award for increasing the debt limit by trillions in 2 1/2 years is credited to President Obama, with the support of the U.S. Democratic and Rhino U.S. Congress, who has managed to hit the debt ceiling at $14 Trillion by 2011.

But, President Obama also receives the Historical National Debt Award for being the first U.S. President in 235 years who with the blessings of congress, increased the National Debt within 7 Months from $13 Trillion to $14 Trillion!  Alas, Obama doesn’t intend to stop there.  He demands that congress hand over the purse strings and push the debt ceiling even higher.  So, when should Americans expect the bubble to burst since congress has been mush in Obama’s hands since 2008? How can congress have allowed the economic outsourcing of jobs to a communist nation and why would they want to build up a communist nation with knowledge that it is destroying the U.S. economic status which could collapse?

2011:  U.S. Population = 311, 756,198  (2008 = 304,421,946)

2011:  U.S. Income Taxpayers = 111,741,291  (2008 = 108,228,953)

2011:  Official Unemployed = 14,055,369  (2008: unemployed 9,503,495; the 2008 U.S. Work Force = 144,672,980)

2011:  Actual Unemployed = 24,814,674 (2008: = 13,495,738)

2011:  State Local Employees = 15, 892,215

2011:  Federal Employees = 4,305,706

2011:  U.S. Work Force = 139,813,347

2011:  U.S. Retirees and SSI = 65,602,765 (2008 = 50,418,079, a substantial increase between 2008 and 2011)

2011:  U.S. Families = 82,102,337  (2008 = 79,288,871) [could the increase between 2008 and 2011 be related to Obama’s illegal aliens made legal and his push for more Palestinian refugees and immigrants into the U.S.?]

2011:  Food Stamp Recipients = 45,037,907  (2008 = 31,042,554) [Is the substantial burden on the taxpayers due to the corruption in the government and banks having to do with the fraudulent loans as well as increased unemployment since 2008 to 2011?]

2011:  Bankruptcies (major increase) = 1,582,470

2011:  Foreclosures (major increase) = 990,799

2011:  Social Security = $15,117,687,999,999* and rising

2011:  Rx Drug Liability = $20,002,863,999,999* and rising

2011:  Medicare Liability = $79,542,296,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Unfunded Liability = $114,661,849,999,999* and rising

2011:  Liability per taxpayer = $1,026,138

2011:  Small Business Assets = $4,518,191,999,999* and rising (2008 = $6,461,734,999,999* and rising) [ Is the substantial decrease between 2008 and 2011 a result of Obama’s failure to help small business expand resulting in the downsizing and businesses closing their doors?]

2011:  Corporate Assets = $13,239,232,999,999* and rising (down from 2008, but note corporate assets are nearly 3 x as high as small business assets) (2008 = $14,8780,440,999,999* and rising)

2011:  Household Assets = $57,928,343,999,999* and rising

2011:  Total National Assets = $75,685,772,999,999* and rising (2008 = $78,713,574,999,999* and rising  – a substantial decrease as of 2011)

2011:  Assets Per Citizen = $242,722  (2008 = $259,250 substantial decrease as of 2011))

2011:  U.S. Total Interest = $3,630,227,999,999* and rising [How can Americans afford the interest, let alone the debt?]

2011:  Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 per year (meaning Americans are getting poorer)

2011:  U.S. Total Debt = $54,934,996,999,999* and rising  (in 2008 the National Debt was $10 Trillion which was an 8 year increase of debt under Bush vs. Obama’s 7 month doubling of the National Debt)

2011:  Total Debt Per Citizen = $176,281

2011:  Total Debt Per Family = $669,109

2011:  Savings Per Family = $6,953  [Note the Total Debt versus Savings]

2011:  U.S. Public Debt Subject to Limit:  $14,291,025,999,999 and rising *

2011:  National Debt Per Citizen = $46,503

2011:  National Debt Per Taxpayer = $129,747

2011:  Income Tax:  $946,651,562,999 and rising *

2011:  Payroll Tax – $840,371,075,999 * and rising

2011:  Corporate Tax = $196,354,114,999* and rising [Please note the huge difference between income tax, payroll tax, and corporate tax]

2011:  U.S. Federal Spending – $3,590,923,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Federal Budget Deficit – $1,393,586,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Total Interest – $3,630,226,999,999* and rising

2011:  U.S. Interest Per Citizen = $11,644 *(that’s how much each U.S. citizen must pay out in taxes just for interest only on the debt each year and rising)

I believe that the Total Mortgage Debt is the major portion of Personal Debt which was caused by our own government after Acorn pressured Congress and Congress pressured Banks to commit a crime and issue fraudulent loans.  Another example of waste is the  multi-millions for the Gun-running program “Fast and Furious launched by Obama as well as the trillions spent on Imams, restoring mosques, trying terrorists in civilian courts, and diverting the trillions to groups like Acorn, Planned Parenthood, the IMF, AIG, and so forth…instead of creating U.S. jobs.  But most business and political leaders don’t mention the wasted $5 Trillion recklessly spent since 2009!

2011:  U.S. Total Debt = $934,999,999,999* and rising every second

Note:  The * and the 999’s at the end of the round numbers listed above are symbolic as those numbers (999)are continually increasing each second of every day!

Imagine in 1959, the U.S. National Debt was at $284,705,907,078!

(Disclaimer: This information is based on Rose Colombo’s personal research and personal opinions as a political activist, not as a government expert on the National Debt, so, I suggest you always seek out economic experts working on issues relating to the National Debt).    Rose Colombo, is the author of the award-winning book, Fight Back Legal Abuse,” featured in the Daily Law Journal and her latest political satire, an Orwellian take on today’s political agendas.  You’re invited to read Free 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary Pages of her book at www.amazon.com

Follow:  www.Facebook.com/RoseColombo  and  Twitter@Rose4Justice

Japan’s Triple Catastrophe Coming Towards America:Why is TSA Radiating Americans As Radiation is Radiation!

Posted on by rose4justice
Rose Colombo, author, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals!
Rose Colombo, author, Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals!

written by Rose Colombo, original (c)  3/16/2011

Fear is the biggest enemy of all people in every nation!  Yes, women and children FEAR being GROPED and RADIATED at the airports and rightfully so while others are exempted!  And, people should fear the Fukushima Nuclear Explosion because it is more serious than reported.  In fact, Hillary Clinton approved food from Japan imported into the USA after the explosion in the news.  Most people don’t bother to  pay much attention unless it involves a catastrophe.  This problem appears to be ignored by the White House, yet it is a serious threat to mankind.

For example, Japan’s 9.0 earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Plant Radiation leaks are an unprecedented tragedy.  Japan has been  hit with three different disasters.  A triple disaster.  And, they continue to live through after shocks in very cold weather.  Japan’s triple disaster has caused a rude awakening for America, Russia, China, and the rest of the world.  Japan’s Tsunami touched the shores of America.  Obviously, radiation can leak into the drinking water, soil, ocean, and atmosphere. If  the radiation becomes  airborne, it can enter into the pores of humans, ocean life, and animals.  Medical Journals state there aren’t any guaranteed safe levels of radiation.

Radiation has adverse health affects. Tragedies such as those in Japan cause the loss of  life, jobs; stocks; homes, and businesses.  In America, this catastrophe has plummeted Wall Street and will cause food prices to rise, but the White House and Obama seem to have been MIA (missing in action).  They don’t up-date America on the serious problem at Fukushima.  The radiation catastrophe affects the economy , The news reported that radiation is blowing in the wind towards California’s West Coast and the radiated trash is washing up along our shores.

Ironically, Obama, Chertoff,  Soros,  Homeland Security and TSA support radiating every American including minor children in America under the guise of fear of terrorism, but it’s pretty doubtful that they get groped or radiated.  Shouldn’t Americans be given the right to be safe and protected from radiation, not threatened with radiation or else punished with an intrusive groping of the private parts of every passenger?  It’s my belief that the federal government should be held liable for any adverse side effects in the future as well as Rapiscan and should be held accountable and made to answer the following questions:

1. Is it healthy for Americans to be radiated as Janet Napolitano has led Americans to believe through Homeland Security?

2.  How is it legal for TSA security guards to radiate Americans as non-health care professionals under the laws of each state pertaining to health care professionals?

3. Why is it that professionals in the beauty industry must graduate from school; attend continuing educational classes, take a state test, and obtain a state license before they can touch anyone or be threatened with lawsuits and jail if they are caught touching anyone without a license, even with a curling iron?

4.  How much more important is it for TSA employees who are operating radiation machines and examining naked photos of people to be licensed health care professionals and follow the health care laws of each state?

5.  How is it that TSA employees can full body radiate Americans without using any protective coverings on their customers as a  precaution? And, what damage could the radiation do to the eyes and where are the long-term studies?  How about cause cataracts?

6.  How does the radiation affect people with cancer or other health problems or people who don’t know they have cancer or don’t know if they are pregnant?

As a long time licensed Skin Care Specialist in the beauty industry, I’ve attended many continuing education classes with doctors and chemists and I can tell you that they warn Americans to stay out of the sun for long periods of time during specific hours of the day and avoid radiation that can cause skin cancer and increase the aging process as well as shorten one’s life span.  The government now regulates tanning beds because people are being radiated by artificial light and even though the government says the beds are at a safe level of radiation, the government believes that the  tanning beds must be regulated because radiation can cause adverse side effects to human beings, but how is it not a risk to the skin cells with TSA’s radiation program?

Most of the medical reports I’ve read state that there are no safe levels of radiation, but the Obama regime states that the newly installed Rapiscan full body radiation scanners are set at safe levels, but how is radiation safe when Americans have been warned to stay away from any radiation.  In my opinion, staying away from radiation is safe!  The reason that there are warnings against radiation exposure such as staying in the sun too long or in a tanning bed too long is simple.  Over exposure is similar to  cooking yourself.  Radiation is heat and it can cook flesh.  In fact, one girl over exposed herself in a tanning bed and hit the news because she cooked herself and died before her wedding day.

Consequently, radiologists, doctors, and dentists, are educated, licensed and certified to operate radiation machines.  Radiologists are  trained and certified and they work under the wing of a licensed doctor or Dentist..  Doctors and dentists require that patients sign and consent before being radiated and treated or touched.  The radiologists cover up all healthy parts of the body before radiating the unhealthy parts of the body and they leave the room before turning on the switch, even though, they must operate within “safe” levels of radiation.  So, the question remains, why leave the room, if radiation is safe and why cover up the body if radiation is safe?

Therefore, will Rapiscan full body radiation scanners and x-ray machines long-term, end up to be a slow genocide for traveling Americans, who are radiated without  protective coverings?  Will Obama implement the Rapiscan radiation machines into entertainment parks and public buildings so there is no escape from being radiated in the future?  Most people are healthy, so why is congress and the American people allowing Obama, Soros, and Chertoff to subject Americans to an unnecessary health care “treatment” of radiation and nude x-ray photos by non-health care professionals knowing the risks of radiation at any levels?  Even a Fox News guest who is an expert on radiation stated there aren’t any safe levels of radiation.  If there are safe levels of radiation as the federal government states under Obama and the news is reporting that the radiation levels in Japan are safe then why are they evacuating the people and treating them for radiation contamination or handing out iodide tablets?  And, what are the long-term effects on children as they must continue to be radiated throughout their lives if Rapiscan isn’t stopped now.

Not surprising in the news is the fact that Obama’s regime provides Muslim women and kids “special considerations” based on their religion, but Americans aren’t provided any considerations based on their Judeo-Christian faith.  Even law enforcement must have probable cause to touch or grope a citizen, but not TSA, who is groping innocent children and American men and women.  Shouldn’t the Obama regime be concentrating on searching the parking lots and the luggage as well as closing the borders along the U.S. from the terrorists?

In conclusion, the American people must ask if Obama and his family and all White House public officials are being radiated every time they fly or did they exempt themselves just like they exempted themselves from Obama Care?  Therefore, why would the Obama administration require that Americans be radiated and state that its safe, yet he opposes nuclear radiation plants in America?  Also, the news reported that Obama is withdrawing the troops in May 2011 from securing the borders, so if terrorists  will continue to enter through our borders then why bother radiating healthy and unhealthy Americans at the airports?  Shouldn’t Chertoff, Soros, and Obama take their Rapiscan radiation to the borders and to the Middle East airports if they really want to catch terrorists?  Someone should inform Obama, Chertoff and Soros that they’re radiating the wrong people.

Remember, radiation is radiation.  The medical and beauty industry reports  which  I’ve read stated that radiation sets off  free radicals that continuously kill healthy cells which is non-reversible.  Radiation can cause cancer.  Radiation can cause death.  Radiation can change DNA.  Radiation can cause sterilization.  Radiation contaminates soil and drinking water if leaked, but so does Corexit 9500 sprayed over the gulf where there are alleged cover-ups.  Radiation is airborne and ends up in the drinking water and contaminates the food.  Japan reported that their spinach and milk and drinking water is now contaminated.

7.  Who in Congress or the Senate or judicial system or federal government owns stock in Rapiscan as they should have to disclose that information.

8.  How is it that Obama could provide U.S. tax dollars from the stimulus money which he promised for jobs and approve it for a private corporation owned by his federal employee who worked under him, Michael Chertoff, executive in Homeland Security, so  Chertoff could fund his private corporation, Rapiscan, without the approval of the American people and why is Obama funding a private corporation with tax dollars?

9.  How then does the federal government state that funding Rapiscan with stimulus funds is not a conflict of interest and abuse of power so Obama’s donors, supporters, and employee can become extremely wealthy?

In essence, it’s my opinion that the American people own Rapiscan since it was funded with U.S. tax dollars and it is the American people who should be issued the stock.  Otherwise, why isn’t Soros and Chertoff  having to reimburse the American people for funding their for-profit private corporation?  Rapiscan is a generational built-in customer base money-maker.  The news reported that Obama’s supporter, George Soros  owns most of the stock in OSI Systems and OSI owns Rapiscan, so how can the congress look the other way.  The funding of Rapiscan was unethical in my opinion and Obama provided no transparency, so did congress open the purse strings and approve the funding?

In my opinion, Rapiscan was set up to radiate Americans for-profit  allowing Soros and Chertoff and the stockholders to use every American man, woman and minor child as Human Capital and as individual commodities for their profit.  It could also cause depopulation long-term. In my opinion, the American people have been tricked into funding their own possible civil genocide depending upon how the radiation effects each American citizen who suffers adverse side effects or death.

By the way, didn’t Made-off, oops, I mean Madoff take people’s money and promise to do some thing specific with it, but instead divert it for his own agendas?  So, what’s the difference?

America is vulnerable to losing its economic status and freedoms under the Obama regime.  It was Obama who stated to America that he would be the “most transparent” president.  He is not. He promised to create jobs with the stimulus money, but he did not.  Instead, he supports radiating every U.S. citizen and simultaneously doesn’t support nuclear power plants.  Wake up, America, it’s nearly too late! **Note:  Readers may share my original Blog, but please don’t change or steal the content and it’s unethical and prohibited by law to Plagiarize written works. 

You’re invited to read 5 Star Reviews and Complimentary pages of Rose Colombo’s award winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” and her latest political satire,  “Obamacare, Dinosaurs, Red Necks and Radicals” at www.amazon.com

For more information and bio on Rose Colombo google www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Follow:  www.facebook.com/rosecolombo  and  Twitter@Rose4Justice