“Obama’s Worldwide ‘War on Unborn Babies!’ Mandated Abortions is Depopulation!”

Posted on May 11, 2012 by

by Rose Colombo (c) 5/11/2012

“The real question today is not when human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?” Ronald Reagan, (pub. Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation)

On or about February 18, 2009, Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General stated, “There will be significant demographic changes this nation never faced…There will be no majority race in the United States in about 15 years…the coming diversity that could be such a powerful positive force will instead become a reason for stagnation and polarization.  Although, there is a crying need for all of us to know the contributions of Black Americans, the Black history month is still a testament to the problems that has inflicted African-Americans throughout our stay in the country….Black history is critical to the knowledge of the Black history experiment.”

Although, Erick holder, USAG, was speaking at a college to mostly Black Americans, his words reflect distinct statements which reveal between the lines that a sinister and secret U.N. Agenda 21 could already be implemented with a stated goal that could reduce the population of U.S. Natural Born citizens including the unborn babies of  Third World nations by 50% by the year 2015.  Holder’s comments reflect Obama’s Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act, which mandates abortions world-wide.  In fact, Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare also includes mandated abortions.  The program titled,U.N. Agenda 21, plans to depopulate the world by 50% and their stated target date is the year 2015.

Recently, Obama shouted out in the media that women’s rights include taxpayer-funded entitlements and their right to acces Planned Parenthood abortion clinics, condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill.  He supports tax funded Planned Parenthood and mandated abortions for-profit.  Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, who was a racist, and wanted to kill unborn babies, who she disfavored. Today, the Black American and Jewish communities should be more concerned about mandated abortions because Sanger wanted to slaughter the unborn Jews and  Blacks. In fact, the Nazis used radiation to sterilize young women for depopulation. Under the Obama administration, American women, children, and men, are radiated at the airports, and naked x-rayed.  TSA performs intrusive groping techniques on U.S. citizens under Obama’s administration, but the Obamas and their family aren’t subjected to the same.  The TSA workers to my knowledge, are not certified or State Board Licensed health care professionals.

In fact, Hitler radiated the Jews for sterilization and experimentation purposes.  Hitler used mandated abortions and sterilization for depopulation of the Jews, Catholics, and anyone else he hated and determined to be a non-person.  And, many experts state that the smart meters emit more radiation into U.S. homes and allege the smart meters can produce harmful adverse side effects.

Remember, there are more Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in Black American communities than anywhere else in the nation.  Under Agenda 21, the Obama administration specifically targets the poor and ethnicities, and specific religions and races, as they live in Third World nations such as Africa, India, as well as the U.S.  It appears that Agenda 21 is in line with the Global Poverty Act, ObamaCare, the NDAA Law, the Patriot Act,  FEMA Executive Orders, or flying drones over the U.S., tracking and spying on U.S. citizens, promoting the microchip,  and implementing ”hit lists” which target Americans as possible enemies of the U.S. government.  And, under the guise of women’s rights, the Obama administration is targeting young girls, pregnant women, and unborn babies.  They are also targeting the Catholic religion and hospitals.

Shall we not ask ourselves if the U.N. Agenda 21 is a program that circumvents the U.S.Constitution and the U.S. Congress.  Isn’t such an agendas implmented to control the masses and how is it that such an agenda isn’t sending up red flags and shocking the minds of every U.S. citizen?  The American people didn’t elect temporary public servants to write new laws or pledge their allegiance to a international institution which oversees the lives of the American people or the United States of America. The American people didn’t vote any public servant into public office to write self-serving and self-protecting laws which circumvent the U.S. Constitution for self-gain.  Yet, the 111th and 112th Congress have the authority to appeal all presidential Executive Orders, but so far, they have failed to Repeal Obama’s NDAA law, TSA radiation as well as groping, and “hit” lists, which  target American citizens as potentional enemies of the U.S. government and circumvent 4th Amendment rights of the U.S. Constitution.

The Obama’s aren’t any different from the Clinton’s as they have the exact same agendas.  In fact, if Obama’s popularity wains, Bill Clinton and Bush Sr. show up to prop up Obama.   And, the Obama’s donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Clinton-Bush Sr. non-profit Haiti fund.  They redistribute the wealth amongst themselves.  The Clinton-Obama agendas have led to excessive Executive Orders which include a war on the unborn babies world-wide.

During the Clinton administration, when Janet Reno, and Eric Holder were under Clinton’s watch, three major events occurred.  The Oklahoma City bombings shockingly killed many U.S. children who were in day care.  Another tragedy occurred at WACO when the U.S. government killed U.S.  women, pregnant women, and men, who were trapped inside the burning buildings.  The third tragedy happened at Ruby Ridge during the Clinton administration when Janet Reno and Eric Holder were under Clinton’s wing and the federal government killed an unarmed pregnant woman holding her baby on the front porch of her home, and shot and killed her unarmed young son in cold blood along with his dog.  Listen up, because the U.S. unborn babies, children, pregnant women, and women, are not immune from being murdered by the U.S. federal government if accused and targeted without due process of law.

It appears that the Patriot Act, NDAA Law, “hit” lists, radiation and groping by TSA workers at the airports, mandated abortions, and death panels under ObamaCare, are an extension of the U.N. Agenda 21 program. In fact, Hillary Clinton and Obama have been working over time to support the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty  since their stated goal is to disarm Americans.  Recently, Panetta stated at a congressional hearing that  he and Obama [we] will seek international permission from the E.U. or NATO, or the U.N., and may or may not  inform the U.S. Congress of the actions they will take in the future.  Also,  Hillary Clinton and Diane Feinstein support the U.N.’s Rights of the Child which denies U.S. parents – parental rights.

Once again, the U.N. is working with other international leaders to redistribute the wealth of America as well as reduce the world’s population by 50% between 1990 and 2015.  On or about December 7, 2007,  Senator Obama proposed and implemented the Global Poverty Act which mandates worldwide abortions and requires U.S. taxpayers to pick up the costs under the guise of reducing poverty.  Senators Biden, Clinton, Feinstein, Kerry and others supported Obama’s mandated abortion law.  A few days later, Obama surprised the American people when he filed the application to compete in the presidential race of 2008.  He ran for the presidential office shortly after he said that he wouldn’t run for president because he wasn’t experienced enough.

Consequently,  Agenda 21 is known as a sustainable rural development program utilizing U.S. tax dollars for the redistribution of wealth with the goal of  developing Third World nations, but without full disclosure, intending to reduce the income and lifestyle of the American people. Perhaps, you recall when Michelle Obama stated to U.S. citizens that they will have to get use to changing their behaviors in the future.  She meant exactly what she said, but the average law-abiding citizens didn’t get it.

How then could the globalists accomplish reducing the population of the world by 50% since the year 2015 is quickly approaching? One of the agendas, which would substantially reduce the population of future citizens in the world, would be to prevent pregnancies by sterilization, same-sex lifestyles, condoms, contraceptives, the morning after abortion pill, and mandated abortions.  Of course, most moral Americans would consider this to be a conspiracy to commit a silent unseen mass murder of unborn babies around the world which would be on-going for 10-15 years.  I coined this conspiracy to be a “civilized genocide.” Perhaps, another agenda which has proven to have adverse side effects occurred back in 1976, after the media and government stated on national TV, the swine flu vaccine was safe, but it was not.  So, what if the federal government attempted another pandemic similar to the swine flu pandemic of  2009, when they attempted to mandate the untested vaccinations and included punishment if refused?

Shall we not ask if the U.N. can complete their goal by snuffing out billions of unborn babies over the next  10-15 years?  It is possible to reduce the population of future natural-born citizens of the U.S. and Third World nations if the government can pull off these agendas by implementing Planned Parenthood into every public school in the nation? The federal government would be obligated to fund  Planned Parenthood with tax dollars. In fact, there are rumors that the federal government might install vending machines into every school stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill. Well, Obama promised change and change has come to America under the guise of women’s rights!

It’s probably safe to determine that encouraging families to have only 2 children in America began with the feminist movement of the 70s.  The feminists influenced married women and brainwashed them into believing that motherhood is a thankless job. The feminists influenced young women into believing that they should be super women by making them feel guilty.  They encouraged young wives and mothers to get out of the house – get divorced – go out and work – under the guise of equal rights. Years ago, President Reagan warned women that equal rights for women would result in more women struggling in the future. He also warned against Pro-Choice laws.

In fact, the feminists made young families feel guilty for having too many kids and encouraged them to have no more than 2 children per family, yet we criticize China for passing a law that says they can’t have more than one child.   Americans are complaining that there are fewer U.S. Natural Born Citizens on U.S. soil today.  That’s true.  There are fewer births of U.S. natural Born citizens today, but foreigners continue to over populate. It was after the feminists pushed for Pro-Choice under Roe versus Wade that more young women aborted their babies.  In the past there were fewer abortions, but today, that number has increased into the millions per year.  Abortion is big business!  Abortion is big taxes!  Aborting millions of unborn babies for more than thirty years guarantees a substantial reduction of U.S. Natural Born Citizens.  So,the fact that the U.S. Natural Born Citizenship is decreasing shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.  American women have been using contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill or aborting their babies for years.

Consequently, by December 2007, Obama secretly pushed the envelope by proposing and implementing his legislation titled, The Global Poverty Act” as I stated, which mandates worldwide abortions and requires U.S. taxpayers to pick up the costs, with the goal of  slaughtering unborn babies around the world, in line with the U.N.’s Agenda 21.  The U.N. and congressional globalists plan to use U.S. tax dollars to fund the abortion of millions of unborn babies around the world and turn U.S. tax dollars into blood money. Could these programs be a secret depopulation agenda, so the elite, who are seeking to play god can create create the perfect human being through cloning?

Remember, Senator Keyes revealed that the unopposed Senator Obama voted for infanticide, which allows the abortionists to leave the baby in an isolated area to die, if the abortionists botches the abortion and the baby continues to fight back for life. In fact, I read that Senator Obama voted for partial birth abortion which meant that the abortionists could perform an abortion even if the mother was six months pregnant.

How then did a Judea-Christian nation lose her way and become so blinded that Americans couldn’t hear or see the unvested man state  that he would  redistribute their wealth?  Bankrupt their coal mining states?  Skyrocket their electricity?  Didn’t the American people realize that senator Obama voted for infanticide?  Didn’t the people realize that Obama voted for partial birth abortions?  Didn’t the  nation know of Obama’s secret implementation of  world-wide mandated abortions?  Didn’t Americans know of his leanings to the U.N.? Didn’t  the American people know of Obama’s failure to provide a certified birth certificate?  How is it that the American people weren’t aware of the U.N.’s Agenda 21, whose stated strategic goal is to to reduce the world’s population by 50%, on or about the year 2015?  How shall the historians explain that a unvested man, prohibited from practicing law,  with several names, birth places, social security numbers was granted the authority to mandate that  millions of unborn babies around the world, including the United States, be slaughtered for depopulation purposes?

According to alternative news reports, which are being scrubbed from the internet each day, Obama attempted to send $20.3M U.S. tax dollars to Kenya so their leaders could implement mandated abortions, after Obama signed mandated abortions into law as an Executive Order on or about January 2009, but there are reports that the U.S. Congress stopped the funding to Kenya from being sent.

The Global Poverty Act mandates abortions worldwide in Third World Nations and includes people who earn $1 or less per day.  Most people living in Third World countries earn $1 per day or less. Obama’s mandated abortion laws assure the U.N. that those nations will have a reduction of future natural-born citizens within 10-15 years, as well, but for what purpose?  The mandated abortions appear to be synchronized worldwide under the guise of reducing poverty and in line with deploring troops around the world, which creates more of what Kissinger refers to as “collateral damage.”  Of course, if you reduce the population by creating wars and targeting future U.S. Natural Born Citizens as  well as unborn babies of Third World nations, there will be fewer people in the world over 10-15 years.  If there are fewer people then common sense tells us there is less poverty, but who are the elite to state that the poor and for example, a great poor man such as Abraham Lincoln, must be aborted?  After all, didn’t Obama state that he grew up poor?  So, how does the U.S. and U.N. justify the slaughtering of billions of unborn babies as moral and ethical?

Furthermore, most people haven’t a clue that Communist China mandated abortions of unborn baby girls and aborted 400,000,000 unborn baby girls. Today, China has a shortage of young girls of marrying age. On the other hand, how is it that the government doesn’t mandate contraceptives in China versus mandated abortions or in countries such as India, Africa, and the Middle East, but promotes contraceptives and abortions as one of Obama’s priorities for American women?  Perhaps, they intend to reduce the U.S. Natural Born population and move in millions of foreigners into the U.S. by forcing Americans off the farmlands and eliminating individualism by creating collectivism for more control.  This theory would be in line with Eric Holder’s comments that there won’t be a majority race in America within 10-15 years.   After all,  the truth is that America isn’t over populated with U.S. Natural Born Citizens in comparison to the number of foreigners migrating into the U.S. each year as more unborn babies are slaughtered and more soldiers die at war and the older generations are passing away. And, of course, if the U.S. Justices were to approve ObamaCare, there will be more death of American citizens because ObamaCare includes death panels and mandated abortions, rationing and denying health care services by the federal government.

In fact, the abortions in the U.S. increased from a few thirty years ago up to about 1,300,500 unborn would have been U.S. Natural Born Citizens who would have been approximately 1 year old in 2012. So, over a period of 10-15 years, that number of slaughtered would have been U.S. natural born citizens could reach approximately 20,000,000 abortions within 15 years making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, the minority on U.S. soil.

Obviously, this attitude that life isn’t sacred, reflects the loose morals that have been adopted in the U.S. and how successful the liberal feminists of the 60s and 70s were at promoting sex outside of marriage as well as abortions.  They promoted the idea that if it feels good just do it!  They promoted free sex for women as an equal right, but they didn’t explain the heartache and guilt or complications for young women which occur when they end up pregnant outside of marriage and end up lying on an abortion table?

In the U.S., mandated abortions are also included under Obama’s health care bill known as ObamaCare. So, over a period of 10-15 years, as more young American girls abort their babies under the guise of women’s rights and fewer U.S.  Natural Born Citizens are born on U.S. soil, it would explain why Obama snubs his nose at Article II.  Article II at that point would become obsolete.  And, as this administration diminishes America’s Judea-Christian traditions, values, the Bible, and Ten Commandments, and brainwashes kids into believing that aborting babies and same sex marriage is no big deal, U.S. Natural Born citizens  will end up as the minority within 15 years as Holder stated in 2009.  If  the U.N. Agenda 21 is successful, the middle class will be obsolete and  Western civilization could  be wiped out as the radicals, who over populate, repeatedly state their strategic goal to wipe out Western civilization and dominate America. The foreign immigrants today, aren’t like the foreign immigrants of the yesterday.  It appears that far too many new immigrants lie with their lips when they pledge their allegiance to the Unisted States of America. Many bold radicals state on U.S. soil that they don’t want to assimilate or be American, but threaten that Americans will comply with their religious and political ideology which is one in the same. And, the best weapon of radicals from the Middle East and even militants from Mexico is that they’ll over populate after entering foreign lands.

Therefore, there’s a reason that Hillary and Obama are redistributing America’s wealth to the Middle East and allowing public schools to insert foreign history and religion into U.S. history – it’s not by chance.  The design is by non-believers in the Judea-Christian God and have no respect for their sworn oaths or the U.S. Constitution.  After all, we have recently learned that there are 80 card-carrying socialists and unvested czars working in Congress paid by U.S. tax dollars. It appears their goal is to shred the U.S. Constitution, freedom, liberty, and the Judea-Christian roots as well as conservatism.

Of course, there are men and women in political office, who want to play God, so these wealthy globalist who gained their wealth because of the U.S. Natural born and generational legal American citizens have shown their ugly agendas and declared war on the unborn babies in America and around the world under the guise of women’s rights and reducing poverty. Should we not ask ourselves,  what did God mean when he commanded his children to keep all 10 of His Commandements written in stone that state, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.”

Ironically, mandated abortions won’t be the only program that can help the U.N. reach their stated goal of reducing the world’s population by 50% by the year 2015, so they must implement other agendas as well.  These agendas also include mandating the indoctrination of kids into same-sex education, which includes transgender lifestyles, same-sex marriage, bi-sexual lifestyles, and cross dressing so kids will be conditioned that this is normal. The Obama and U.N. agendas will influence more kids to be indoctrinated into same-sex lifestyles which reduces the population as well for obvious reasons.  And, Obama implemented open gay lifestyles in the military so these programs will recruit more young people into same sex lifestyles over time, so this will produce a reduction of U.S. Natural Born Citizens, as well.

Consequently, the goal to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens may include taxpayer paid contraceptives, condoms, and the morning after abortion pill, as well as, abortions performed  in every hospital across America combined with the  vending machines installed across the nation and  stocked with contraceptives, not snacks, as well as same sex indoctrination under the guise of education.

In conclusion, the Communist Chinese government punished women who attempted to hide their pregnancies or gave birth and attempted to hide their baby girls from the government.  In fact, the Chinese people cook unborn babies aka fetuses and eat them as  a delicacy.  Also, the unborn babies aka fetuses are being ground up and used by U.S. corporations as flavorings in foods and drinks, which many people refer to as, cannibalism and alleged to be  in line with satanic rituals, not Christian biblical laws. There are Scientists and Researchers, who use the fetuses for experimentation or cloning as well as for stem cell research which began in Great Britain.  The Researchers prefer the six month old fetuses aka unborn babies because the baby’s organs are more developed for experimentation. This is the reality of Wall Street in bed with the U.S. and world leaders who are in line with the U.N. Agenda 21.  Perhaps, we can say that Planned Parenthood is a seamless assembly line of pregnant women and unborn babies aka fetuses used as human commodities for profit and as a reason to increase taxes.  And, the government and Wall Street values the pregnant women and unborn babies aka fetuses as having value and worth and as human capital to be used as a tool to increase taxes and for-profit as well as for depopulation of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens.  The globalists hope to create their utopian world and change the world from what it is to what they want it to become as well as who they want to exist in the next 10-15 years.

Rose Colombo is a legal activist and founder of the Pro-Justice Institute formerly known as Women Fight Back.  She’s been seen on TV and heard on radio and featured internationally in print. Order her self-help whistleblower book, Fight Back Legal Abuse, available on Amazon and BN.com or visit her website at www.fightbacklegalabuse.com  (Disclaimer: Nothing said is meant to be legal, medical, political or financial advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only.)  Click Like and Share this article if you enjoyed it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IS OBAMA SENDING $20.3M Taxes To Enslave Americans to Palestinian Refugees Tied to Hamas?

Posted on April 13, 2012 by

MAKE VIRAL – SWEPT UNDER THE RADAR  — HR 1388 PASSED

Rose Colombo -Rev. 4/13/2012; 4/12/2012

 STOP HR 1388!!  STOP THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA – IS OBAMA SENDING $20.3M U.S. Tax Dollars to Enslave Americans to Palestinian Refugees who are members or supporters of HAMAS? - DEMAND CONGRESS REPEAL HR 1388 – asap –  Barack Hussein Obama is reported in the news to sneak his long time in-waiting legislation through Congress, although the left will deny that America isn’t aware of Obama’s bill,  HR 1388, which includes $20.3M on the backs of U.S.taxpayers.  But truth is that most Americans don’t have a clue that HR 1388 was approved after secretly introduced during 2009 to the 110th Congress,  put before the 111th Congress, secretly passed, and signed off, as an Executive Order by Obama.  Today, the 112th Congress remains silent on HR 1388, with knowledge that Obama and the former Congressional members, secretly slipped HR 1388 under the radar. I checked several news sources including CNN, as well as, SNOPES and  confirmed that H.R. 1388 passed, and to the best of my knowledge, its been passed.  Barack Hussein Obama, as well as the 111th Congress, along with the blessings of the 112th Congress, who must approve of Obama’s Executive Order H.R. 1388, allege that the $20.3M U.S. tax dollars is for emergency purposes, but what’s the point if they aren’t intending to migrate into the U.S. as the Executive Order requires migration - just as ObamaCare mandates and requires that the U.S. Natural Born Citizens – Americans – pick up the costs for the medical care of specific foreigners, so this is probably to be covered under ObamaCare, if it is passed.  H.R. 1388 requires that U.S. Natural Born Citizens – Americans – pick up the costs for the refugees food and housing, as well as, the medical.   How is it that this regime is more concerned about foreigners than about Americans who are suffering from homelessness because of their corruption –  and standing in food lines and unemployment lines – because they failed to create jobs – since 2008.  Why aren’t Americans being helped over the past four years with their small businesses so they can expand and hire more people – and why or why aren’t we drilling for oil?

The bill reads, “provide emergency funds for unexpected urgent refugees and migration needs related to Gaza…”  and specifies the requirement of food, housing, and medical.  This begs the question if this has anything to do with ObamaCare’s mandates and requirements of U.S. Natural Born Citizens being forced to pick up the health care costs of foreign immigrants, illegals, and union members, as Congress, exempts themselves from the laws they didn’t read, but approved, so they don’t have to pay up front, or comply, or else be visited by an IRS agent, and threatened with one year in jail, and a $25,000 penalty for non-compliance.  ObamaCare is a recipe for disaster.

After all, America’s families are hurting because of the 15,000,000 people unemployed.  In fact, the 112th Congress denied seniors their Cost of Living increase for two years, which is the first time in U.S. History, a Congress punished seniors then increased the cost of the Medicare payments taken out of the social security checks every month making seniors poorer.  How is it that Obama and his unvested Czars continually attempt to cut the wages and benefits of the U.S. military soldiers, veteran,s and seniors, so Americans must why  is there only money for the Middle East, but not for Americans?  Is it that this regime considers certain Americans as being “obsolete?”

H.R. 1388 could devastate the lifestyle of the  United States of America, if Palestinian Refugees with members and supporters of HAMAS were to migrate into the U.S.  Also, H.R. 1388  includes financial requirements of the U.S. Natural Born Citizens if the Palelstinian Refugees migrated into the U.S. by the thousands.  How is it that the 112th Congress remains silent on such a crucial matter?  So, should Americans assume that the 112th Congress has little concern for the American people, as verified by their secret approval of  HR 1388, if not, than how is it they haven’t Repealed HR 1388?  After all, do they not have knowledge that HR 1388 was signed by Obama as an Executive Order into law and with the vulnerability in Gaza- where else would they go?

 Could the passage of HR 1388, give the green light to Obama, as part of his desire to fulfill his father’s dreams, so he can bring  thousands of Palestinian Refugees into the United States of America who admittedly are members or have ties to Hamas? Surely, public servants watch the news and have knowledge that the members of HAMAS are reported in the news to be involved in blowing up cars and buildings, which can be viewed on video, as well.  Also, under H.R. 1388, Obama requires that the American people, the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, be forced to pick up the expenses for the housing, food, and health care costs of the Palestinian Refugees with U.S. tax dollars - [or else be punished, I shall assume, if ObamaCare passes].  Think about what this will do to the economy in the United States -  law enforcement - housing,  jobs, food, health care, Judeo-Christian religion, the U.S. government, and the U.S. Constitution which is being shredded right before our very eyes, with the blessings of the 110th, 111th and silent 112th Congress.

In the mean time, if the U.S. Justices fail to null and void the unconstitutional ObamaCare, Obama’s Health Care Bill, which in my opinion, is a restructured set of laws that wipe out all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, as well as, enslave the U.S. Natural Born Citizens, than Americans will be required to pick up the health care costs of ObamaCare for Congress, federal workers, 500,000+ SEIU Union members, thousands of Palestinian Refugees, 10,000,000+ Muslims living in the U.S., and 12,000,000 illegal aliens or else! Or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and one year in jail!   CALL OR EMAIL EVERY  CONGRESSMAN AND DEMAND THAT THEY REPEAL –  HR 1388  - AS WELL AS THE DANGEROUS NDAA BILL NOW!  SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!  May God Help The United States of America!  CONGRESS HAS THE POWER TO REPEAL ANY EXECUTIVE ORDER!

The bill reads, “Payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of Department of State related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian Refugees and conflict victims in Gaza,” so it specifically states that the $20.3M is for the implementation to be used by the U.S. Department of State who handles “refugees” and “migration” from Gaza and implement migration – is it migration into the U.S. as it is the U.S. Dept. of State assisting the migration – and if not – where else would they have them migrate?  America doesn’t have the authority to help thousands of refugees to migrate into foreign lands – so again, I ask – migrate to where?

For more information on H.R. 1388 visit:  www.thefederalregister.com - or research  – Presidential  Determination No. 2009-15, 1/27/2009; Federal Register, Page 6115, The White House, Washington, 1/27/2009 (FR DOC E9-2488 filed 2-3-09 at 8:45 a.m., Billing Code 4710-10-P

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Which Constitutional Authority is Obama or Congress Applying to Exempt Themselves, Foreigners, Unions, Refugees,Illegals from ObamaCare?

Posted on March 31, 2012 by

Rose Colombo – Rev. 4/11/2012, 3/30/2012 (C)

“The proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:  Congress shall make no law that applies to the senators and or representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States of America.”

Wake up, America!  How is it that the U.S. Congress and Executive Office and U.S. Judicial Officers would dare to hold themselves above the laws of the land, which they mandate for you and me, yet, they have the audacity to exempt themselves, even though they swore an oath to uphold all constitutional laws and follow all laws of the land?  It’s even more disturbing that most recently the 111th Congress stated they didn’t bother to read the national health care bill, which is an umbrella law known as ObamaCare, and is a  restructured set of laws replacing  freedom and liberty, in my opinion.  ObamaCare consists of 2,000 pages of excessive  mandates and excessive regulations, including excessive punishment, but it only targets American citizens , not foreigners, cronies, unions, congress, illegals, or refugees – 2,000 pages of regulations and punishments - the 111th Congress stated that they did not read, but approved!

In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, “The American people must not go down to their level, but must force the lawyers to come up to their level.”

After all, Article II of the United States Constitution requires that a U.S. President meets a specific requirement for a specific reason as written by our Foundsers.  A Natural Born U.S. Citizen is a  baby born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens, period!  There isn’t any compromising on the law. All laws must be changed through proposed new laws or proposed amendments in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and approved by the U.S. Congress. 

So, how is it that an inserted amendment written by Obama into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order is rendered the law of the land or even constitutional law, if it circumvents Article II without congressional approval?  Obama’s self-serving and self-protecting inserted amendment provides to himself  – the authority to conceal his identity from the government  – and from the public.  It would seem that it isn’t ethical or constitutional for a public servant to write self-serving and self-protecting laws or amendments which alter or circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval.  When did writing an amendment with the intent of circumventing a constitutional law and inserting the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order without congressional authority suddenly be rendered a law of the land?  This begs the question why is the U.S. government treating an “amendment” inserted into a pre-existing executive order which circumvents Article II being treated as an amendment to Article II of the U.S. Constitution without congressional approval?  Shouldn’t it be viewed as meaningless or not?

Isn’t it true the U.S. Congress  must approve all proposed amendments that would change, circumvent, or alter any constitutional law?  This makes it very  difficult to understand why the U.S. federal government is allowing  Obama to write an ”amendment,” and insert the amendment into a pre-existing presidential Executive Order, so he can declare it as a constitutional law and conceal his personal identification records from the world, since all amendments to change constitutional laws must be presented to Congress and approved by Congress. To my knowledge,  Article II, as defined by the Law of Nations, remains the law of the land  and requires identification of a candidate’s birth certificate as proof of his or her U.S. Natural Born Citizenship in order to be eligible to be a U.S. President.

The reason our Forefathers were wise and established Article II as an intricate part of the U.S. Constitution requiring  that a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be the only person eligible to be a U.S. President is to prevent  foreign and anti-American usurpers  from stealing the birthright of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen and denying him or her their right to be a U.S. President.  It is the birthright of every U.S.  Natural Born Citizen passed down from their U.S. Natural Born Father that must be protected.  The Forefathers required that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be a U.S. President in order to ensure that the birthright passes down from generation to generation assuring the preservation of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, sovereignty, our Judeo Christian roots, traditions,  and for the preservation of  Western Civilization so  future generations can live free and carry on the Liberty Torch.   

For example, a usurper could bring millions of foreigners into the United States of America with the intent of dominating the United States of America.  He may intend to donate funds to public schools with the requirement that they insert foreign history into U.S. History books. His agenda might include donating funds to Christian churches and requiring they insert foreign religion into their Christian religions.  Perhaps, he intends for the migration of millions of foreigners to dominate the land and wipe out Western Civilization making the U.S. Natural Born Citizens the minority. 

A usurper with an iron fist may decide to reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens through mandated abortions.  Perhaps, he’ll implement radiation of all citizens, but exempt those he favors; perhaps abuse the use of chemicals, indefinite detention, assassinations, assisted suicide, denying and rationing health care and medications, denying organic foods; promoting contraceptives and the morning after abortion pill; denying natural vitamins and herbs; or donate to public schools requiring that they indoctrinate U.S. kids into same-sex lifestyles under the guise of education.  All the potential agendas are programs that could be used for depopulation of a nation’s natural-born citizens and future natural-born citizens. 

A tyrannical usurper, legitimate or not, who wields power unjustly and arbitrarily to oppress the citizenry, is a despot.” 

Should it not be a major concern to the American people, when a U.S. President and U.S. Congress grant absolute power to an unvested president granting him the power to assassinate or indefinitely detain Americans based upon an accusation?  It appears to me that the American people should be  very concerned when they witness an unvested president and the U.S. Congress shredding the U.S. Constitution, especially  Article IV, and deny their citizens due process of law. Yet, Obama and Holder demand that all Middle East radicals be treated with kid gloves and that they be read Miranda Rights and be provided Due Process of Law.  How is that?

Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, raised his hand on or about January, 2009, and repeated the presidential sworn oath leading Americans to believe that he is a U.S. natural-born citizen, prominent lawyer, and law professor prior to the elections.  The American people are continuously demeaned by the media, if they ask questions about Obama’s birth place.  In fact, the media is alleged to have misled Americans into believing that the Obama’s were prominent lawyers, but failed to report that they had been investigated by a branch of the Illinois Supreme Court and prohibited from practicing law, which is public record, and this may have changed the outcome of the elections.

Although, Philip J. Berg, esq., challenged Obama’s eligibility in the U.S. Supreme Court prior to the inauguration, Justice Roberts denied the lawsuit.  On the day of the inauguration about January 2009,  Obama repeated the presidential sworn oath with his hand on the Bible, but flubbed it up, and repeated the oath a second time with his hand off of the Bible, so it begs the question if it was intentional, after all, he mocked the Bible and Jesus during a speech.  Obama swore to uphold, defend, preserve and protect all U.S. Constitutional laws, as required by the law of the land including Article II and Article IV.  A violation of a U.S. Sworn Oath can be punishable according to federal law.

But, on or about January 2009, after Obama swore the presidential oath administered by Justice Robert including, Article II,  the question remains if he intended  to circumvent Article II prior to his sworn oath or during his sworn oath because without hesitation and upon taking office, he immediately inserted an amendment into a pre-existing   presidential Executive Order to conceal his personal identity and circumvent Article II without congressional or constitutional approval, so when did he decide to conceal?  Is it not mind-boggling how Obama was allowed to provide himself  the authority to conceal his identification records  from the entire United States government including law enforcement, federal judges, and the American people, who pay his $400,000 per year taxpayer wages, and as a result are told that they aren’t allowed to request that a certified copy of his U.S. Birth Certificate be presented  in a court of law even if filed by credible professionals?  So, again, I ask the question, under which constitutional authority is Obama applying that provides to him self the authority to circumvent Article II of the U.S. Constitution by inserting an “amendment” into a pre-existing Executive Order and by-pass Congress?  

Obama’s inserted amendment to conceal his identification records states that he can seek the advice of the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder.  But, how is concealing his identity from the government and the American people lawful, constitutional, or ethical?  After all,  Article II requires identification of  the public servant and proof  that he is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. After all, his sworn oath doesn’t state that he can pick and choose which laws he will or will not follow or that of Congress.      

On the other hand, how is it that an amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order signed by President Bush, which circumvents Article II of the U.S. Constitution, be considered a constitutional law, because according to Representatives Lundgren and Ron Paul, they stated that Executive Orders were not intended to be laws and are not laws.  Thus, how is an  amendment inserted into a pre- existing presidential executive order written by Obama, which conceals his personal identification records and circumvents Article II, be treated by law enforcement and congress as a lawful law since he didn’t present his amendment to  alter Article II to the 111th Congress and  seek Congressional approval?       

So, should Americans dare ask if Obama’s intent was to conceal his identification papers prior to taking his sworn oath or at the time he swore to uphold the entire Constitution of the United States, or the day of writing the amendment, because Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 elections, secretly inserted an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill,  to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II, which is public record.  The intent to remove the words U.S. Natural Born Citizen from Article II combined with Obama’s writing a secret ”amendment” into a “pre-existing presidential Executive Order” which circumvents Article II’s requirement of proof of U.S. Citizenship, but is intended to conceal his identity from the government and from the American people immediately after swearing his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution is troubling for the majority of American citizens.    

 Furthermore, so shouldn’t there be a question by Congress as to whether or not if secretly writing an amendment that circumvents Article II to avoid producing a U.S. Certified Birth Certificate immediately after swearing an oath to uphold Article II is an  ethics violation since a sworn oath is administered and believed to be repeated in “Good Faith” in front of God and witnesses.  After all, Obama and his wife, Michelle, presented themselves as prominent lawyers in good standing with the ABA, and in fact, presented Obama as a law professor.  The media also presented them as prominent lawyers, but they didn’t disclose that they had been prohibited from practicing law prior to the elections.  And, Sworn Oaths are administered based upon the belief that everything the candidates represented to the American people is honest and factual.   After the elections of 2008,  published records from the  Illinois Supreme Court appeared on-line disclosing that Obama and Michelle Obama had been investigated and prohibited from practicing law which is public record.  If the candidates and the media had published the truth then perhaps, Hillary or McCain could have won the elections. It’s also interesting that the  ABA and the Illinois Supreme Court judicial officers allegedly didn’t inform the DNC or the Congress of that information. 

As I stated, this begs the question of  why Obama found it necessary to write a secret amendment inserted into a pre-existing Executive Order with the intent to circumvent Article II, after he swore to uphold all constitutional law, including Article II, especially since he’s prohibited from practicing law. And more importantly, one must ask why Congress and law enforcement are considering an amendment inserted into a pre-existing executive order to conceal a president’s  U.S. Birth Certificate and other personal records required by Article II  be considered  an”amendment” that lawfully or constitutionally changed or altered Article II back in 2009?   

These questions are complicated not only by the fact that Obama is prohibited from practicing law, but the fact that he admits his father is a natural-born citizen of Kenya, a Muslim, African, and Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth.  And, according to the Law of Nations, a baby born on U.S. soil to one parent who is foreign-born isn’t eligible to be a U.S. President.  Surely, Harvard students are taught basic 101 constitutional law.  

How then are the federal lawmakers justifying that the U.S. Congress and the oval office are granting themselves the authority to exempt themselves from the laws which they are mandating for the U.S. Citizens.  ObamaCare is a restructured set of laws known as consisting 2,000 unread pages which were not read, but approved.  The 2,000 pages include hundreds of mandates, excessive regulations, fines, penalties, death panels and mandated abortions, as well as excessively cruel and unusual punishments including IRS agents knocking on citizen’s doors, but not on the doors of the Obama’s or the U.S. Congress. Congress exempted themselves from the laws of the land which they are also obligated to follow, but for some reason, think they have the authority to hold themselves above the laws of the land and exempt themselves from the same treatment they’re dishing out for the American people, but not for themselves or the millions of Muslims,  SEIU union members,  possibly millions of Palestinian refugees, and illegals.  So, if ObamaCare is such a great umbrella law with thousands of pages of mandates and regulations, punishments, and fines, as well as death panels, which deny all freedom and liberty,  then why did Congress exempt themselves from being forced to pay up, comply, and from punishment?

In fact, it appears that only U.S. Natural Born Citizens will be picking up the tab for millions of people who won’t have to pay up and have contributed nothing or very little to our nation, but if the Americans are forced up to pay up and don’t comply, they will be sent to jail for one year and ordered to pay a $25,000 penalty, and have an IRS agent sent to their home or business.

ObamaCare is the restructured set of laws which replace all freedom and liberty and punish U.S. Natural Born Citizens fulfilling his father’s dream, I suppose, who believed America was an oppressive nation.  Yet, all the people who are anti-American and apologize for America are the same people  refusing to live anywhere else, jetting about ,and living off  taxes of the hard working American citizens.  ObamaCare represents tyrannical laws imposed on citizens who live in Communist and Third World nations.

Therefore, I have three questions:  1)  How can the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and  U.S. law enforcement follow an amendment written for self-serving and self-protecting reasons into a pre-existing executive order with the intent of circumventing Article II, with the intent of concealing an unvested president’s identification, be considered constitutional or  lawful, since the amendment which circumvents Article II wasn’t presented to Congress or approved by Congress?  2)  How can a public servant who admits his father is foreign-born and a Subject of Britain, which makes him a Subject of Britain upon his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948, not be vetted properly by the congress  or federal courts, as it is their fiduciary duty to correct the records  for historical purposes and for the welfare and safety of the American people;  3) Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. President, the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves  from the laws of the land they mandate for you and me  as well as provide themselves the authority to exempt millions of foreigners, refugees, illegals, and people Obama favors or those who support the Democratic Party from complying with ObamaCare?

Rose Colombo, a long time legal activist, award-winning former local newspaper columnist, whose Irwin Award Winning book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” available on amazon.com or Bn.com, empowers people with self-help information and true short stories of injustices.  She’s helped motivate victims of legal abuse become survivors since she founded the first self-help group in the nation for victims of injustices.  Visit www.fightbacklegalabuse.com  – Thanks for the read and please click the like star button below –

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Obamacare: How Is Favoring Cronies; A Foreign Religion, Illegals or Congress Affordable for Disfavored Americans? The Sheeple Led to the Slaughter?

Posted on March 29, 2012 by

Rose Colombo, Rev. 4/6/2012,  3/29/2012 (c) – the original author who created the question of  the mandate that hit the news and was read on the congressional floor currently being decided before the Supreme Court - “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Illegal” pub. 12/2009, 2/2010, 3/2010, 4/2010

Broccoli!  What kid wants to have to eat broccoli? Justice Scalia questioned if Obama who implemented the umbrella law known as  ObamaCare could mandate that all Americans eat broccoli, but Justice Scalia, may not be off base at all!  After all, Michelle Obama is pushing programs which mandate what Americans can or can’t eat!  She’s promoting a snack watcher program in public schools instructing students to report teachers, parents, and classmates who eat unhealthy snacks.

Therefore, if the Obama’s are so concerned about saving lives by pushing for ObamaCare, as a fantastic deal for Americans, then the federal workers and public servants should be the first to sign up. Shouldn’t government workers be the first to sign up and comply? And, if Andy Stearn, the SEIU union’s leader and loyal Obama supporter believes ObamaCare is such a great program then why does he want to be opted out along with his SEIU union members?

Therefore, Americans must ask what’s worse?  Is the current private industry’s health care plan who may deny pre-existing conditions under their plans worse versus Obamacare which forces Americans against their will to pay up or else be punished for non-compliance with the knowledge that the federal govenment granted themselves the authority to deny, ration, or send Americans to ”early end of life counseling” - euthanized based on one’s health, age, and costs to the federal government – even if the Americans have complied and paid up front?  Also, ObamaCare requires that Americans who don’t comply spend one year in jail and pay a $25,000 penalty.  In fact, the federal government grants themselves the right to confiscate and access business records, health records, tax records, and banking records subjected to confiscation by the government.

Therefore, this begs the question if the majority of Americans are aware that Bill Clinton, approved a Presidential Executive Order 12825 dated January 25, 1993, ordering a study  on“Human Capital.”  Now, if you don’t think that isn’t ghoulish than think again.  Human Capital is the study of using every unborn baby, and every man, woman, and child as a “commodity for profit.”  This order is a study of worth, value, or lack of value for profitability to the federal government and Wall Street.   

For example, Wall Street and the federal government may be in bed attempting to push programs that privatize prisons for profitability.  In other words, the Wall Street investors would want the lawmakers to make more laws so they can imprison more Americans which is mentioned in my book, Fight Back Legal Abuse.  Perhaps, the plan is to target more Blacks or Hispanics, Asians, women, children, or poor and Middle Class Whites, to fill their prison beds. There’s also the possibility of targeting businesses and  confiscating their assets.  Greed has no boundaries. There isn’t any profit in empty prison beds. The prisoners, as I state in my book are commodities living in warehouses, and those  working as administrators are in the business of warehousing people for profit.  After all, a significant punishment under ObamaCare is a $25,000 penalty and one year in jail!  This could substantially increase the prison population.

Perhaps, the system will use the prisoners for slave labor, so the investors will earn higher profits. Slave labor reversed in America by a sinister plan using the implementation of excessive regulations and replacing the constitution with mandates, requirements, regulations, taxes, jail, and penalties and denying due process of law.  Is that possible in America? 

In fact, in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, I state that America imprisons more people than any nation in the world.  America imprisons more people than Russia or Communist China.  And, I warn that Americans should be alarmed and very concerned about such a shocking Super Power claim to fame.

In this example, if ObamaCare was approved, even though the U.S. Justices, the U.S. Congress or the U.S. Senate has refused to-date to properly vet Obama or the Obama Care Czars, Obama and his unvested Czars would be chosen for a special Council and they would be assigned the task of assessing  each patient according to their age, health, and cost to the federal government as a “human commodity”

Remember, national health care began with HillaryCare now morphed into ObamaCare.  So, why did I write in 2009 – and warn the nation and Congress – ObamaCare is “Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal,” well here are some of my concerns as follows:

1.  How is it that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices legally and constitutionally moved forward to hear the ObamaCare case with knowledge that Justice Elena Kagan did not Recuse herself?  As a result, the majority of Americans requested she recuse herself prior to the ObamaCare hearings and uphold the federal Code of Ethics, but she did not.  There are many reports of the strong favorable association between Kagan and Obama as student Obama at Harvard and Senator Obama, who appointed Kagan as Solicitor General and its alleged she represented him  in eligibility cases. Also, after Obama took office as an unvested president, she worked on and in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General.  And, what in most opinions appears as a reward, she was appointed by Obama to be a U.S. Justice prior to the ObamaCare being heard in the Supreme Court. Justice Kagan’s obvious admiration and favoritism towards Obama and the personal work she performed in favor of ObamaCare as Solicitor General is public record.  Most Americans view this as unethical and having the cards stacked against the American people which casts a grave shadow of doubt and distrust on the Supreme Court.

2.  Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress applying that provides them the authority to ”avoid”  Article II of the U.S. Constitution?  The word “avoid” was used by Justice Thomas at a hearing .  It boggles the mind that the congress and U.S. Justices would even consider hearing laws which are implemented by an improperly unvested president who admits that his father is  foreign born. Obama proudly states that he comes from a long line of Muslims, born in Kenya and at the time, Obama’s father was a Subject of Britain, making Obama a Subject of Britain at birth; thus inheriting his birthright from his Kenyan father as a British Subject.

The fact is that Obama admits that he inherited his birthright as a Subject of Britain from his foreign-born father, but allegedly doesn’t admit that he doesn’t meet the definition of eligibility required by Article II and the definition written into the Law of Nations as the Law of Nations. The Law of Nations is written into the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of  Independence, as a reference to all U.S. constitutional laws when in question, which has been upheld for 235 years.

3.  Why is the U.S. Supreme Court considering 2,000 pages of laws, regulations, penalties, fines, punishments, jail, intrusions, and mandates, which were never read, but approved by the 111th Congress? How then can unread laws be argued in the U.S. Supreme Court if the petitioners never read the laws which they approved?  After all, it is the fiduciary duty to the U.S. Constitution and the American people, for the U.S. Congress to read all laws and ensure that they are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the will of the majority of Americans, before they hit the Supreme Court.

4.  Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court apply that grants them the constitutional authority to force Americans to pick up the tab for millions of illegals, who are living in America and don’t pay taxes, remain unidentified, and are residing in the U.S. in violation of the law?

5. Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and the executive office applying that provides them the authority to exempt themselves from the laws they mandate for you and me, like ObamaCare, and hold themselves above the law?

6.  Under which constitutional authority would the U.S. Supreme Court use to force Americans to pay for the health care of 500,000 plus union workers knowing Andy Stern, according to the news, has visited the White House frequently consistent with a revolving door policy?  How is it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Congress approve the opt out of SEIU Union administrators and members, with knowledge that they support Obama and  donate substantial amounts of money in support of Obama’s campaign?  How does the congress and the Justices justify these constitutional issues as just, fair, or equitable versus a serious Conflict of Interest which reeks of Favoritism?

7.  Obama’s admitted he comes from a long line of Muslims from Kenya.  So, how is it not a Conflict of Interest and Favoritism considering that a secret page was exposed on-line reported in alternative news  known as Page 107 alleging that at least 10,000,000 plus Muslims will be opted out by claiming protection under Sharia Law and Dhimmitude? Why is a foreign law even inserted into a U.S. restructured set of laws under the guise of health care and who wrote it and who inserted it?

8.  Under which Constitutional law would the U.S. Supreme Court be applying that would grant them the authority to exempt the U.S. Congress from the laws of the land which they mandate for all Americans, unless they are not U.S. Citizens, because all U.S. Citizens, including all public servants must follow the Rule of the Law.  Therefore, which constitutional authority is congress or the Justices applying that provides them the authority to hold Congress above the law or pick and choose which laws of the land they will insert loopholes and exempt themselves? For example, exempting themselves and holding themselves above the law from the crime of Insider Trading while forcing everyone else to be punished?

9.  Under which constitutional authority is congress and the Supreme Court applying that provides to them the authority to punish Americans if they don’t want to pay up front for a consumer product that they may or may not want to buy with their own earnings – as a payment for a consumer product is not a tax – but it is a payment in exchange for a consumer product or service referred to as earnings after taxes - earnings are private property - so how can the federal government force Americans to turn over their earnings to the federal government for a consumer product against their objections? 

Remember, mandates deny freedom and liberty.  Mandates are “regulations,” for consumer products taxed under the “Commerce Clause” so how will the Justices justify taxing “citizens of each state?”  In other words, would that not mean that they are seeking to use every human being as a “commodity” for profit for the federal government’s coffers under the guise of healthcare, but isn’t health care.  Isn’t this nothing but a thug like law of pay up or else? Mandates replace all freedom and liberty guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Obama’s new restructured set of laws in my opinion replaces the U.S. Constitution,  known as ObamaCare,which would create the Obama Nation.

So, could the mandated aka forced pay up front for ObamaCare be the biggest Ponzi scheme ever – bigger than Social Security – by the federal government should they pilfer the mandated taxes?  After all, past congressional members diverted the taxes collected for the retirement of seniors known as  Social Security.  The Congress promised to save the taxes collected to be deposited into a retirement Trust Fund, but it was not! In other words, pay up front, but after we collect the mandated alleged “tax” then if it doesn’t pan out –  then too bad-  we’ll bankrupt the program.

But, as the nation knows all too well, the congress bankrupted Social Security by secretly diverting the funds.  The congress bankrupted Medicare.  The Obama administration handed over $535,000,000 to Solyndra - stimulus U.S. tax dollars promised for jobs to a bundler;  the employees lost their jobs, and the executives took excessive wages and bonuses and then  bankrupted Solyndra!  So, why would the Obama regime care if they bankrupted ObamaCare after they collect billions in payments up front, which  they are calling a “tax” from the pay up front mandate, which is a ‘regulation?”  Many  politicians are invested in Wall Street and pharmaceutical companies. Wall Street and the government investors make trillions off the worker bee slaves in America. Are they thinking, those “stupid” Americans, why not use them as ”human capital” for government taxes and Wall Street profit?

Obviously, the problem with the federal government turning themselves into a  private enterprise for-profit health care industry as well as remaining a government body who is takes over free enterprise  control of the nation’s health care industry, is unconstitutional, for no where in the constitution does it grant the federal government the power to take over private corpoations. ObamaCare will only lead to disaster and devastate the quality of health care which Americans have always experienced. So, should we not ask what’s the difference between the mafia forcing people to hand over money so they can remain in business or else be punished?

So far, the federal government hasn’t provided the taxpayers with health care brochures disclosing which consumer products and services the taxpayers can expect from the federal government’s health care program in exchange for the forced alleged ”taxes.”  The federal government granted themselves carte blanc to decide if they will exchange nothing for the taxes  paid up front if they so choose by adding into ObamaCare the statements that they can “deny” or “ration consumer products and services, which in my opinion, is patient dumping on a national scale, for-profit. By  the way, shouldn’t the federal government provide a liability statement disclosing how the taxpayers will be compensated for any losses or injuries caused by any federal health care provider’s negligence?  And, the federal government should be required to carry national federal malpractice insurance.  Aren’t there health care boards that oversee the health care industry? It’s my opinion that the federal government will cause economic problems for the private insurance companies who sell malpractice insurance.

How then does the federal government “operating” as a private industry provide themselves the authority to “avoid” complying with federal laws or provide disclosures about the health care consumer products and services they are selling and forcing the American people to purchase, against their objections, as part of the regulations required by U.S. regulators prior to selling or providing consumer products?  Don’t they need business licenses, medical licenses, and Consumer Protection licenses?  After all, they are venturing into the health care business and it is a matter of life and death for the American people!  As a matter of fact, more people die from mistakes made by doctors every year than at war – now that’ pretty serious.

And, even more remarkable is the fact that Obama and Congress are mandating that all U.S. Natural Born and generational legal Americans, who Obama doesn’t favor, be ordered to pay up front for services, or else be punished with a $25,000 penalty and a one year jail term! This means that he’ll put more Americans out of work and cause more divorce and break up more families who will lose their homes. Or perhaps, under the NDAA law, if you don’t pay up, there’s the possibility of being indefinitely detained.

ObamaCare is every U.S. Citizen’s worst nightmare !  Obama care surpasses even the worst HMO, you can ever imagine.  Seniors would probably receive better health care services in prison! They wouldn’t have to worry about their health care services being denied or rationed!  After all, under President Clinton’s “Human Capital” study, more mature Americans will  probably be assessed as worthless and costly to the federal government and label them as  “obsolete.   So, at least in prison, seniors would  have the best of health care services provided by the working citizens who are forced to pay up front for millions who didn’t earn their way, but at least they’ll be provided 3 meals per day and free room and board!  Either way, Americans will be enslaved and punished so Obama can fulfill his father’s dreams.

Most people will be in a state of shock if ObamaCare hits in 2014!  Seniors will be mandated to pay up front from their social security checks currently set at $100 per month upwards of  $247 per month. I guess Obama and congress want to make sure America’s seniors and veterans, sick, and disabled, who worked for 40-50 years, and paid more than their fair share of taxes, will continue paying up front for everyone else who just arrived off the boat!  Not to worry, though, because Obama took his full yearly taxpayer wages of $400,000 as reported in the news.  And, the 111th and 112th Congress took their hefty taxpayer wages and voted themselves a hefty cost of living increase.  This is the first time in U.S. history that seniors were denied a  a cost of living increase by the 112th Congress. Now, that says a lot for many politicians without character in D.C., right?  Some times, there’s just a lot of characters running the show.

This agenda reminds me of “Patient Dumping” on a USA National scale!  According to the CBO at the White House, it was announced twice that about 2009, ObamaCare was decided to be financially unsustainable long-term after Obama misled Americans to believe it would cost U.S. taxpayers about $9 billion.  Recently, the news reported ObamaCare will cost upwards of about $2 Trillion plus. And, most worrisom is the secret clause, which wasn’t disclosed, stating that ObamaCare includes an additional $17 Trillion in taxes. It appears that Obama and the Congress could care less about the mandates, punishment, and costs, because they exempted themselves from paying up front and from punishment for non-compliance.

Is it now appropriate then to ask the question which remains unanswered as to which  constitutional authority did the 111th congress apply that provided them the legal authority to exempt themselves from the laws of the land as well as Obama and his family?

Furthermore,  there’ll be fewer doctors to take care of the millions of new patients, and Americans will have access to fewer U.S. natural-born qualified doctors, as more qualified American doctors will retire, leaving more foreign doctors working for the federal government from Third World nations. U.S. natural-born doctors won’t want to work under the thumb of the federal government and under a microscope 24/7 because they’ll be required to work harder, longer hours and obviously, quality will slip down to that of a factory worker on an assembly line.

In other words, if  millions of future unborn U.S. Natural Born citizens are aborted under ObamaCare’s mandated abortions, contraceptive programs, death panels are utilized, as well as, denying and rationing healthcare, denying or rationing prescriptions for the profit of the federal government and U.S. tax dollars paid for the redistribution of the millions of foreigners, who don’t pay up,  then U.S. Natural Born Citizens could very well become the minority on U.S. soil within 10-20 years and foreigners would become the majority, thus making Article II,  of the U.S. Constitution, as Obama likes to say, “meaningless.”  In fact, Eric Holder, stated, ”Americans will be polarized.  The face of America will be changed within 10-15 years.”  Is this part of a depopulation program of U.S. Natural Born and future U.S. Born citizens in conjunction with shredding Article IV and replacing it with the NDAA Law?

If a foreign nation and their foreign government agents wanted to wipe out Western Civilization, wouldn’t they have to eliminate the U.S. Constitution and replace it with a new restructured set of laws under a new name like ObamaCare and under the guise of health care, which denies all freedom and liberty to Americans and maes Americans slaves of a foreign law and foreign religion and foreign immigrants. 

Consequently, a depopulation program requires agendas which would possibly include same sex indoctrination of minor kids in public schools under the guise of education as well as same sex indoctrination in the military.  Also, mandated abortions; death panels, early end of life counseling, radiation, which  can cause cancer, can alter DNA, sterilization, and rapid aging, as well as, denying and rationing health care and prescriptions, euthanasia, and limiting what doctors can or can’t do as the perfect recipe for depopulating U.S. Natural Born Citizens, if that were an agenda under Obama’s Global Poverty Act and the U. N.’s depopulation program known as Agenda 21.

Perhaps, Congress should have asked why would Obama’s health care program include punishment for Americans only and American doctors?  Remember, the U.S. Natural Born Citizens are the envy of the world for the U.S. Natural Born birthright is an inheritance from our U.S. Natural Born Fathers  who are U.S. Natural Born Citizens born on U.S. soil and born to two U.S. Natural Born Citizens.  America has many jealous anti-American enemies.

However, it remains my opinion that ObamaCare threatens the very freedom and liberty established by the Constitution for 235 years as well as could eliminate the U.S. Natural Born Birthright passed down from our U.S. Natural Born fathers for the preservation of Western Civilization.  This is the reason that only a U.S. Natural Born Citizen is eligible to be a U.S. President, so foreigners cannot usurp the U.S. Constitution and steal a nation which is what Hitler did – he stole nations and stole their birthrights.

Unfortunately, under ObamaCare, seniors, the sick, and veterans will end up poorer.  In fact, the  average American will end up poorer and enslaved to the federal government with excessive and cruel and unusual taxation, fines, penalties, and punishment while the foreigners benefit and over populate and dominate.

In my opinion, ObamaCare is a thug-like law that is called legal but in my opinion, there isn’t any difference if a U.S. citizen is confronted by a thug who threatens a citizen and says, Pay up or else!’  Or “Hand over your money or else!”  What if a car dealer told you to pay-up-front for two years, but you can’t drive the car off the lot, come back in two years, and if we’re still in business then maybe, I’ll let you drive the car for a while or maybe, not at all?  What’s the difference?

Rose Colombo is a long time Consumer Advocate for Justice, who has first-hand experience and third-party research and documentation on constitutional violations.  She was the first to warn America and Congress and the media about the mandate and punishment and immediately when she wrote her reps and congress and blogged world-wide - suggesting  State Attorney Generals and Sheriffs file lawsuits,  “ObamaCare is Unconstitutional and Illegal” and her key question is now before the Supreme Court.  Disclaimer:  Nothing said is meant to be political, legal, financial or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com - Thanks for the read – please click the like  – star button below

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Ring The Liberty Bell:Definition of U.S. Ntl Born; Article II and Article IV are Blowing in the Wind in an Ugly Direction!

Posted on March 25, 2012 by
  • Rose Colombo  3/24/2012 (C)
  • The Bible states, “Woe to you lawyers!’  Luke 11:46
  • The definition of a U.S. Natural Born or Native Born Citizen as defined in the Constitution referred to as a requirement of Article II and  references the Law of Nations, pub. by Emerich de Vattel, 1758 – written into the U.S. Constitution for definition as well as the Declaration of Independence as follows:
  •   
  • “The U.S. natural-born citizen of a nation is a baby born to two U.S. natural-born citizens whose baby is born on U.S. soil at the time of birth.”  In addition,  “for if he is born of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth and not his country.”

Wake up, America!  The Liberty Bell is ringing out with alarm warning Americans that their U.S. Constitution is being shredded by a man, whose eligibility is in question as president of the United States as he is by-passing congress and the constitution and writing Executive Orders that deny access to Article II and Article IV without Congress invoking their authority to Repeal those executive orders.  Article II and Article IV are blowing in the wind in an ugly direction.  In fact, by Obama’s own writings and admission, he states that his father is ”foreign-born” – a subject of Britain at the time of Obama’s birth – making Obama a subject of Britain under the British Nationality Act of 1948.  Such improper vetting which has been brought before the court and congress does not reflect transparency and is not in accordance with Article II, thus leaving his eligibility without proper vetting and congressional certification as required by constitutional law, Article II, unresolved.   

Under which constitutional authority is the U.S. Congress and U.S. Justices applying which would justify their decision to avoid Article II, a very important law of the land, as it involves the highest office in the land?   Has the U.S. Congress relinquished their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, country, the flag, and fiduciary duty as they avoid and ignore Article II which remains of serious public interest to the American people?  For example, since 2008, the congress continues to pass laws which the majority of Americans do not believe are in accordance with constitutional law, they boldly refuse to perform their fiduciary duty and pass laws without reading the laws by their own admittance, but instead, take bribes for votes. 

In fact, the majority of Americans believe that the NDAA Law, the Patriot Act, mandated abortions, assassinations and hit lists and indefinite detention of Americans based on accusations are unconstitutional.  Also, ObamaCare is not in accordance with constitutional law or the will of the majority of Americans.  Yet, the 111th congress didn’t seem to care as they passed unread laws that deny freedom and liberty under the guise of health care. In fact, they didn’t hold the executive office accountable for firing off 220 Tomahawks at Libya and killing civilians; or the millions granted to Solyndra; IMF; or the Fast and Furious program which killed innocent people!   How is that justified when human life is no longer considered “sacred,” but “meaningless.” 

Shall we then determine if the congress, senate, Justices, and federal judges, are working for or against the people since they have the definition of a U.S. Natural Born citizen at their finger tips known as the Law of Nations?  What then shall we say to our children and grandchildren when America’s history is changed and inserted with false foreign history and our nation’s constitutional laws are shredded and blowing in the wind?  Do we say, “We could have done some thing, but we did nothing?”  Should we say, “We could have said some thing, but we remained silent?”  Should we say, “We should have thrown the bums out, but we were fearful?”  Is it not true that our unvested president, as vetting is required by Article II,  is a man whose identity is concealed for he has admitted that his whole life is about fulfilling his father’s dreams which is ironic since he only saw his dad once.   His  biological father, Barack Hussein Obama is reported in the news as a man who was already married with two children and that his wife and kids lived in Kenya, yet, Obama’s account is that he was married to Obama’s white mother. Stanley Ann Dunham, on or  about 1961, but to-day, there is very little proof of any  marriage.  On the other hand, if Barack Hussein Obama, sr., married Stanley Ann Dunham on U.S. soil, he would have committed bigamy and committed a fraud upon his mother.  So, the question remains, if his white mother married a man who was already married with children begging the question if Stanley Ann Dunham had knowledge of the marriage of if Barack Obama sr. committed a fraud upon his mother while in the United States.  The history of segregation up through the civil rights movement and even thereafter as tightly enforced, which was at that time, when a Black man with a young white woman would have been unacceptable, but Obama presents it as if there weren’t any problems.  His on-line birth certificate lists his dad as African at the time of his birth, but people cry out that there wasn’t any such race in America at that time, which is true.  The term African-American wasn’t introduced until the early 80s. But, if his biological father was born in Africa then it would be correct to list his race as African, which confirms that his father is foreign-born, and a subject of Britain at Obama’s birth in 1961.

Also, several news articles report that Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., attended Harvard Law School on a foreign student loan, but Obama points out that his father believed America was an oppressive nation. Perhaps, this is one of the reasons that Obama jr. stated that other nations believe that American is an oppressive nation, which needs to change and “redistribute” their wealth as he sees fit, obviously.  In fact, Obama refused to wear “that pin” on his lapel for that very reason – America being an oppressive nation –  for quite a while after the elections. Kenyan news reported that Obama sr. was involved in a car accident and died.  An interesting point that Obama writes about in his book, Dreams of My Father, which caught my attention is his inference that he isn’t fond of his mother’s race, but he was working on dealing with his moms’ race.   Therefore, it’s only logical to conclude by Obama’s own admission that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, is foreign-born in Kenya and a Subject of Britain who comes from a long line of generational Muslims as he stated in several speeches.

Well then, shall we just shred Article II as another “meaningless” law since congress has not invoked their powers to protect Article II, Article IV, or preserve Due Process of Law?  Due Process of Law was established by our Forefathers and it is the only protection from tyranny that shields the American people when falsely accused of being an enemy; non-compliant, dangerous, or extremist.  Should the  government’s military forces be able to  knock down your doors and drag you into the streets and execute you or indefinitely detain you without charges filed, without a lawyer, and without a trial?  Are you aware that this happens in America based on accusations and that innocent people have been injured or killed, even children?  Are you aware that this happened during Katrina.  In fact, the police shot and killed innocent people who were standing on a bridge and in April 2012, three were sentenced to imprisonment and one police officer, who didn’t kill anyone was given a lighter sentence. Also, there were people, including seniors, who were forced out of their homes as they searched for guns, and manhandled.  Ten thousand people were locked inside the dome and denied the right to leave, but indefinitely detained. There were reports swept under the carpet of hospital patients having been euthanized.

Is the Great Republic being diminished and brought to her knees by tyrannical laws; such as the NDAA Law, and the Patriot Act, or the Rapiscam, oops, I mean the Rapiscan full body naked x-ray and radiation scanner operated by unlicensed techs by a thug like system of  being thrown into the microwave oven and naked radiated or else choose door #2 and upon entry submit to have a TSA worker moles and grope you and your children and parents, unlicensed health care professionals at airports?  Americans punished for non-compliance (non-compliance is a term used by socialists), yet the Muslims are exempted?

How is it that ObamaCare which is not a law, but an umbrella law that includes hundreds of new restructured laws, regulations, mandates, punishments for Americans who aren’t favored and opted out are having every  freedom and liberty denied under ObamaCare which is established in the Constitution?  The 111th Congress admits that never read the 2,000 pages of punishment and taxes, including the secret $17 trillion in additional taxation, but approved the unconstitutional laws by congress, which is a failure to perform their fiduciary duty as lawmakers.  Ironically, this unjust, unfair, and inequitable new set of dictatorial restructured laws reeks of favoritism, nepotism,  collectivism, which in my opinion, replaces freedom and liberty, and replaces the U.S. Constitution.  In fact,  ObamaCare favors millions of his union supporters, Muslims, illegals, and refugees,  who won’t be punished and won’t have to pay up front for their own death panels, or mandated abortions, mandated vaccinations, mandated early end of life counseling along with jail and penalties for those who don’t comply or pay up front for services not rendered and may never be rendered.  The enslaved will be forced to pick up the tab for all those who are new immigrants, refugees, illegals as well as prisoners and federal workers.

Are there still three branches of government in existence within the United States or is it all theatrics? Since 2008, the majority of Americans have concern as to the actions of  Congress and the Judiciary who appear to have relinquished their powers and morphed into one branch of government known as the Executive Branch.  If the congressional and judiciary branches of government fail in their fiduciary duty to exercise their powers and prevent the shredding of the U.S. Constitution then the Rule of  Checks and Balances is meaningless, as well.   After all, they do seem to have stepped aside and granted the executive branch carte blanc rights to absolute power.

We The People are quite aware that Article II has been rendered meaningless by the Justice Department, the Congress, and the Executive Branch.  Well then,  how is that happening in America?  Justice Thomas stated at a hearing, the Justices intentionally “avoid” Article II!  He also inferred that a person no longer has to be  a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be president – not anymore – which left questions as to what Justice Thomas knew about the 2008 elections and Obama’s eligibility.  The legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born or U.S. Native born Citizen has been defined for 235 years until 2008 as written in the book titled, the “Law of Nations, and is the book which U.S. justices and congress define laws as well as written into the U.S. Constitution and the Law of Nations.

In other words, isn’t it true that a  foreign-born baby, or a baby born to one foreign-born parent, even if one parent is a U.S. Natural Born Citizen, is not eligible to be a U.S. President because they do not meet the requirement of being a U.S. Natural Born Citizen as required by Article II?  Even foreign nations require the same unless there is a coup d’etat in the works.  An American can’t go to the Middle East and apply to be the King of Saudi Arabia or the President of Iran. Obama may not be eligible to be the president of Africa because Obama inherited from his father,  his birth right as Subject of Britain.  An American can’t go to Great Britain and apply to be King of the UK.  But, maybe Obama’s chances would be greater if he requested to be Knighted by the British Queen, than by the leaders of Africa, based on his being a Subject of Britain. After all, Obama has a complicated and complex background and he has claims of being white, Irish, Black, African, Kenyan, a British Subject, Muslim,  Christian,  U.S. Natural Born Citizen born in Hawaii, a prominent lawyer, law professor, community organizer, as well as an adopted son of Lolo Soetoro where he lived and studied in Indonesia, “one of them,”  and a Kenyan grandma stating she was present when he was born in a Kenyan hospital.

There are documents from the Kenyan Parliament which published in the Kenyan records as they were concerned about Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship.  The record stated that Obama was born in Kenya and is a Citizen of Kenya and a Subject of Britain, which were published back in 2008.  The Parliament stated in the documents that America must not require a U.S. Natural Born Citizen be elected as a U.S. President.

On the other hand,  babies born to foreigners on U.S. soil are referred to as inhabitants or foreigners and upon being legalized by immigration are known as  naturalized citizens, but they can’t inherit the same birth rights of the U.S. natural-born and U.S. native-born children of the U.S. Natural or Native born fathers which are passed down from generation to generation making only the U.S> Natural Born Citizen eligible to become a U.S. President.  Since 2008, Obama has stated a myriad of times on television and in writing that his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, sr., is a native-born Kenyan and a subject of Britain as well as an African and a Muslim. Even the Prime Minister of Kenya stated Obama was born in Kenya.  After all, anyone with common sense realizes that it doesn’t make any sense and definitely not logical or economically sound  for any responsible citizen to spend $1,000,000 with the intent of  concealing a $35 certified copy of a birth certificate from federal judges.

At the time of Obama sr’s birth, Kenya was a British Colony, under the rule of the United Kingdom, where his Native born father, was born as a British subject governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 making his biological children, including Barack Hussein Obama, jr., subjects of Britain at birth.  The British Nationality Act of 1948 (part II, Section 5) states that subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after commencement of this act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of his birth. Obama inherited from his father at birth, his citizenship as a British subject established by the British Nationality Act of 1948, so it matters not where he was born – Kenya or Hawaii – except for truth – his having a foreign-born father renders him ineligible by U.S. Constitutional law, Article II, which requires a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen even if he was born in Hawaii as he claims and even if his mother was a U.S. Citizen.  Even former California Governor Schwarzenegger stated he can’t be a U.S. President because his parents were born in Europe.  Congressman Rubio stated he can’t run for U.S. President because one or both of his parents weren’t U.S. Natural Born Citizens. So, how is it that congress doesn’t remember the definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen?

Indonesian Adoption:  We The People also have read that his mother married Lolo Soetoro and lived in Indonesia with Obama jr. with the stepfather.  Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama by marriage making Obama, a minor child,  an Indonesian citizen, which allowed Obama to attend a madrassa, which he calls a Catholic school, but they can’t teach Christianity , only Islamic studies in Indonesia, and therein lines a big difference of what a child is taught and where he’s rooted as to his beliefs, religion, and ideologies.  He also admits that his stepfather changed Obama’s  name to Barry Soetoro.  We the People read that Indonesia didn’t  recognize dual citizenship at the time Obama and his mom lived in Indonesia nor did the U.S. recognize dual citizenship, so upon Obama’s returning to the U.S. as an adult, he would be required to repatriate himself, but did he do that?  And even if he did repatriate himself then why doesn’t he produce his immigration papers as a naturalized citizen based on the fact his dad is foreign-born? And, how is it that he allegedly received foreign student loans since one must be foreign-born to receive foreign student loans?

The eligibility lawsuit filed  by Philip J. Berg, esq, on or about 2008, was denied by Justice Roberts.  I wrote letters to Justice Roberts and each U.S. Justice in support of the eligibility lawsuit stating that if they didn’t hear Berg’s lawsuit and resolve eligibility as required by  Article II that there could be a very bad case precedent set in 2012 which could cause anti-American foreigners, usurpers, and illegals to challenge Article II in the courts using Obama’s 2008 vetting case as a legal basis.  How then without properly identifying a U.S. President or correcting the record legally for historical and public record are his Executive Orders constitutional and legal?  Perhaps, the Congress and Justices do not want to admit their failure to vet a candidate properly, but the problem won’t disappear like a rabbit in a hat.

Genius is the word that should be used when referring to our Forefathers, for they understood that the day would come when federal public servants and Wall Street would fail in their fiduciary duty to their country and citizens.  They knew that the day might come when federal lawmakers might attempt to avoid, re-write, ignore, manipulate, shred, and deny U.S.citizens freedom and liberty and even attempt to replace U.S. Constitutional Laws with a new set of restructured laws that deny every freedom and liberty under the guise of health care or under the guise of protecting citizens from terrorism. Freedom and Liberty has been established for 235 years guaranteed by  the U.S. Constitution, which provides due process of law, freedom and liberty, sovereignty, right to choose, and the right to life, with the intent of preventing tyranny.

Again, never forget the legal definition of a U.S. Natural Born Citizen which is required with the specific intent of preserving the Republic for future generations of U.S. Natural Born Citizens.  Article II is required in order to prevent a foreigner from usurping office, whose passions lie elsewhere and whose intent could risk the safety of our nation.  Article II is required because a U.S. President must “Love” his country and “love” the Natural Born Citizens; he must “desire” to preserve the laws, traditions, and culture passed down to biological children from their U.S. Natural Born Fathers, therefore preserve our nation’s culture.

Article II is the most important law of all!  Our forefathers created Article II to preserve Western Culture for future generations, so a foreigner cannot usurp the  laws and steal a nation or pilfer its wealth to be used for agendas other than to benefit the American people. Article II provides security that a U.S. Natural Born U.S. President inherits their birthright to become a  candidate and be elected as a U.S. President, which is a birth right passed down through generations, from their natural-born fathers.  Obama’s father didn’t have the U.S. natural-born birth right to pass down to Obama, therefore, he should step down and allow a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to exercise his or her birth right as a U.S. President.

Again, it’s important to understand that Article II doesn’t allow for compromise, but requires that a U.S. President be a U.S. Natural Born or Native born Citizen.  The  Forefathers intentionally inserted the Law of Nations into the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence so generations of  Americans could always refer to the legal definition of  constitutional law.  An unvested man, who concealed his identity using Executive Orders with the intent to by-pass Article II after swearing an oath to uphold Article II, shouldn’t be allowed to remain a mystery from the people or supported by congress and the judiciary. If that is the case, then the congress and judiciary must take the responsibility if our nation is injured as their gross negligence and  failure to uphold Article II , which is causing grave doubt and distrust, in the minds of the U.S. citizens, even around the world.  

A majority of Americans fear that their nation could be changed and their lives jeopardized by the failure of public servants to perform their fiduciary duty according to their sworn oaths. Remember, Khrushchev said that a nation can be taken down without dropping one bomb, but most recently, the Russians have stated that the Americans are stupid for not vetting a U.S. President. 

In fact, Eric Holder made a very disturbing statement at a college with a majority of Blacks in attendance when he stated, Americans will be polarized!  Within 10-15 years, the face of America will be changed.  He was called out on such a statement and made to apologize.

Article II requires a U.S. Natural Born Citizen to be a U.S. President, so our democratic Republic can’t be overthrown by foreigners, period. 

Never think lightly of the GENIUS of great men, our Forefathers,  who understood tyranny, yet, they provided brilliant laws which allow Americans a guaranteed right and a duty to resist peacefully, or even exercise force in some cases, against oppressive laws if the citizens fear their government is threatening the safety of its citizens and their families, property, or country, clearly written into U.S. constitution and stated laws. Remember, under the Clinton administration, there were two attacks by our government against American citizens at WACO and at Ruby Ridge. American men, women, and children, were killed on U.S. soil versus upholding Article IV and exercising the rights of the citizens to access due process of law. 

For example, in the 1970s, Chile was a democratic government with a democratic leader.  Henry Kissinger mentors U.S. candidates and presidents such as Nixon, Ford, Carter, Clinton, Obama, Palin, and McCain.  Kissinger and Nixon were behind the veil when Chile’s government was overthrown and the lives of the Chilean citizens changed over night.  The citizens of Chile were shocked when the coup d’etat began bombing their city and firing upon innocent citizens.  The citizens were taken over by tyrannical militants and they  lost their freedom and liberty over night.  Free enterprise was devastated as military tanks rolled in rendering all innocent citizens helpless.  The frightened and abused citizens were beaten,  rounded up and jailed, tortured, killed, separated from their loved ones, and forced to pay extremely high taxes as a tyrant named Pinochet was ushered in to rule the people with an iron fist  After he established his tyrannical government, he released the remaining citizens from prison. Those who opposed the government’s agendas were arrested and indefinitely detained or executed.  How then do we allow a public servant/s to devalue the worth of human life if the congress places no value upon the lives of its own citizens and views people as “non-persons” or enemies of the state?  In fact, millions of future citizens of a nation can be wiped out by government mandated abortions!

Thus, it is important to wonder why Congress and law enforcement have skipped over the fact that Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro attempted to insert an amendment into a military bill proposed by Rep. McCaskill in 2008 prior to elections, an amendment that would eliminate the words, U.S. Natural Born Citizen, from Article II, since Bill Clinton had inferred that Obama is not a citizen, as well as, McCain, during the presidential campaign of 2008?  Such a move would have let Obama off the hook as far as eligibility goes or the Kenyan government believing American didn’t care about Article II’s requirements back in 2008.

Why would Senator Hillary Clinton, running for the same office in the same election, even want to help Obama secretly remove the words “U.S. Natural Born Citizen” from Article II of the U.S. Constitution?

Why would there be allegations that Senator Pelosi altered the wording before signing the  Certification involving Obama’s vetting records?

Why would Obama’s Kenyan Grandmother and the Kenyan Prime Minister state that Obama was born in Kenya, as well as other on-line birth certificates posted by Kenyan newspapers?

In conclusion, based upon the knowledge admitted by Obama that his biological Kenyan father born as a  subject of Britain, Barack Hussein Obama sr  – and  only his mom being a U.S. natural-born citizen – baffles the average mind of  how congress and the judiciary continue to  justify that Obama jr. was qualified to be elected as a U.S. President in 2008, and thereafter,  as required by Article II and as defined by our laws which is at the finger tips of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Congress.  Shouldn’t the admitted fact that Obama’s father is  a foreign-born Kenyan and a British subject making Obama a British subject at birth in 1961 - be considered more than enough information along with his inserting amendments into an existing executive order with the intent of concealing of his identity immediately enacted after swearing an oath to uphold Article II.  His self-serving and self-protection amendment provides precise instructions which state that only by his consent or the advice of Eric Holder can his identity be released for public scrutiny, even to congress, or law enforcement for identical purposes should congress or law enforcement desire to conduct hearings relating to his eligibility to prove or disprove if he meets the requirements of Article II established by the U.S. Constitution.

 Obviously, it is important that the  American people remember they are the government, and this federal regime has trampled on “limited government” – trampled on the laws of the land.  Americans have constitutional laws allowing them to exercise and resist peacefully against unconstitutional or rigged elections, illegal donations from foreign sources; improper vetting procedures; and unconstitutional laws by petitioning, emailing, calling, writing, changing laws, researching, and filing Grievances with the U.S. Congress.  Shouldn’t congress suspend Obama’s job as president and his Executive Orders until they complete an investigative hearing and determine his eligibility?  It’s only when the congress exercises their authority to certify the truth on public record that U.S. Natural Born  Americans will feel vindicated from being called names, such as “birthers”  for attempting to preserve the nation’s Western laws and culture for future and current generations of U.S. Natural Born kids, grandkids, and future generations.

If it is wrong to request that Congress uphold Article II then how is it right for them to remain as lawmakers, for if that is the case,  should they refuse to uphold constitutional law and perform their fiduciary duty - have they now become law breakers?  Do they not desire to preserve the U.S. Constitution as well as the Republic, Western culture, Judeo-Christian roots and traditions, the economy; the preservation of  freedom and liberty, the preservation of due process of law, the preservation of the right to life, so future U.S. Natural Born Citizens can inherit the same birthrights for which they are entitled, not foreigners who immigrate into the U.S., but U.S. Natural Born citizens able to fulfill their duty if they choose to become a U.S. Natural Born President?  But if that Birthright is stolen by a usurper aka a foreign immigrant than the U.S. Natural Born Citizen is denied their inheritance of their U.S. Natural Born birth right and their legal right – should they so choose – to become a U.S. Natural Born President of the United States of America – a most honorable position to embrace and cherish.

It’s a mystery as to why the 111th and 112th Congress and the U.S. Justices would fail to uphold Article II, but it is the most important law established by our Forefathers as well as Article IV which provides to every individual their right to exercise due process of law.  There’s a statement I wrote in my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse, “Without due process of law, there is nothing.  Nothing but tyranny.” 

  1. On or about  2001 and 2008, and most recently, Obama stated that his goal was to ”disarm” Americans on Meet the Press about 2008. (He launched Fast & Furious in 2009 with $10,000,000 of stimulus money promised for jobs).  Obama stated in 2001 and 2008 and in 2011 that congress and the constitution are “meaningless.”  About 2001 and 2008, he stated that at the “Constitution is nothing more than a charter of negative laws [liberties] which need to be changed,” which may have been scrubbed on the internet. The statements of his father being foreign-born and the myriad of other allegations should be enough for congress to suspend Obama’s presidency until the congress, and senate can sort out the truth based upon constitutional law, because whenever there is a question as to a public servant’s qualification, then the laws he has implemented shouldn’t be rubber stamped and enforced until the truth is certified and made public. It is the fiduciary duty of the U.S. Congress, Senate, and Justices to uphold their sworn oaths and uphold the constitution, including Article II.  U.S. federal public servants should represent the will of the majority of  U.S. Natural Born and U.S. Native Born Americans in exchange for their jobs and wages.  The failure of these public servants to acknowledge the Grievances of the American people shall only cause their cries to ring out louder until the winds stop blowing in an ugly direction.

Rose Colombo has proposed laws from time to time for 25 years; spoken before the Ca. Senate, Criminal Justice Dept. of Planning; Granada Forum, L.A. Press Speaker’s Bureau (standing ovation); received many award for her writings on injustices; a former local news columnist, cable TV producer and radio and TV talk show host; legal activist; leading her to utilize her knowledge as the first person in the world to recognize the unconstitutionality of mandated healthcare in America and consequently, write it up  and inform congress, her representatives, and the media and nation when she asked the key question before the Supreme Court on Monday, March 26, 2012, relating to mandated health care aka Obamacare, and published her blog worldwide on-line utilizing sites such as  Congress.org, and Newsvine, Townhall and more.  Rose was informed that her key question on mandated Health Care as well as her name was read on the congressional floor from her blog –  ”Obamacare is Unconstitutional and Possibly Illegal!” (pub. 12/2009) – Disclaimer:  Nothing said is meant to be legal, political, financial, or medical advice, but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. visit my website for bio, book, photo, videos, awards – www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Did Panetta Say That He and Obama Seek OK of Intern’l Powers to Deploy Troops; Declare War; Forget the U.S. Congress?

Posted on March 21, 2012 by

by Rose Colombo –  3/21/2012 (C) -(you may listen to the archived interview with myself and Chuck Wilder dated 3/27/2012 at www.crntalkradio.com/chuckwilder

Did  Secretary of State, Leon Panetta, just inform the U.S. Congress, that the U.S. Congress hasn’t  any authority over the actions of Panetta, the military, or the U.S. President?  

In a stunning congressional hearing, which included General Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and led by the Hon. Sessions, the testimony of General Dempsey and Panetta boggled the minds of the congressional members and that of the American people on or about  March 2012.  Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, stated that he and president Obama may or may not inform Congress of their actions when declaring war or deploying U.S. troops around the world because they intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission from international powers such as NATO, the U.N., or E.U. or an international assembly.  Panetta referred back to the attack on Libya when he and Obama did not inform Congress of their intent to attack Libya and assassinate Gaddafi, but the question remains, whose “legal basis” or “permission” did they seek to fire off 220 Tomahawks?

Consequently, Panetta’s statements beg the question if he referred to Libya as justification for his current stance so he could cite Libya as a case precedent for justification of their intent and desire of eliminating the sovereignty of the United States of America preserved as an inheritance by our Fathers, who were natural-born or native-born Americans, to be passed down to the natural-born or native-born children, which should be the desire of all public servants;  but on the contrary, it appears that such actions as stated by Panetta would grant absolute powers to Panetta and Obama as he referred in his testimony, not only to Obama, but stated “we” intend to seek a “legal basis” and seek permission of international powers and that they may or may not inform congress of their intent in the future.  Therefore, it begs the question if it is possible that Libya was attacked as a test case for future justification should they deploy our troops around the world or attack another nation without congressional and constitutional authority?

Obviously, the American people were not pleased when they heard the news that Panetta and Obama ordered the assassination of an unarmed leader of a nation, Gaddafi, who didn’t attack or threaten America, without congressional authority and without being captured alive and provided due process of law.  For if one man is denied due process of law how then should any man be provided due process of law thereafter?  The news reported that Obama with Panetta’s blessings ordered 220 Tomahawk missiles fired off at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 per Tomahawk, and those costs were passed onto the over burdened U.S. taxpayers, who are struggling to survive.  So, shouldn’t Congress have considered that they should investigate the reckless spending of U.S. tax dollars and the risk to the country’s welfare and safety  since they control the purse strings as part of their fiduciary duty?  Also, the attacks on Libya,  in the name of freedom, and congressional approval cost the lives of an undocumented number of innocent civilians and Freedom Fighters, whose families are now seeking compensation from the U.S. government for their losses.

Did Panetta state that they may or may not inform Congress of their decisions to declare war or send U.S. troops around the world, but will base their decisions upon the “legal basis” of international powers and permission from NATO and the U.N. or E.U. and other international assemblies?  Isn’t that like lawyers playing games with words such as “legal basis” similar to Bill Clinton spinning the word “is” or the Obama administration spinning the word “war” with “mission” to avoid congressional authority?  Are they attempting to use Libya as a pattern to circumvent the will of the American people represented by the U.S. Congress and disrespect the American people who pick up the tab for their decisions?

Hon. Sessions informed General Dempsey and Panetta that the U.S. Military answers to the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President and the U. S. Constitution.  He informed them that the U.S. Congress is not dependent upon NATO or a U.N. Resolution to execute foreign policies consistent with the National Security of the United States

Rep.  Sessions asked Panetta if he was saying that Obama is taking the position that he would not act if it was in the best interest of the U.S., if the U.N. did not agree.  Panetta commented that when it comes to military action that he and Obama would like some “international legal  basis.”  He said, “We want to build a coalition - we want some sort of legal basis as we did in Libya.”

Rep. Sessions said, you worry about some ”international basis” but you didn’t worry about the fundamental constitutional legal basis this Congress has over the War Powers Act.  He said that congress wasn’t asked whether or not Obama and Panetta were in direct violation of the War Powers Act.

Panetta answered that “we would come to Congress and inform you.”  He said, we’re going to seek international approval and we’ll inform you.  If we’re working with an international coalition or NATO, we will want to get appropriate “permission” to do that – all of these countries would want to do that – we will reserve the right.

Rep. Sessions asked if he was stating that NATO would give Panetta and Obama a legal basis. Panetta said that if he and Obama developed an international coalition – an ad-hoc coalition of nations of NATO – who would give them a “legal basis.”  Rep. Sessions inquired as to who they were asking for a legal basis.  Panetta said that if the U.N. passed a Security Resolution as it did in Libya- we would do that.  If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that so we have options here.  We want to build an international support.

Rep. Sessions assured Panetta that he’s all for international support, but stated he was baffled that Panetta was stating that he and Obama needed an international assembly to provide a legal basis to deploy U.S. troops into combat.  Rep. Sessions informed Panetta that they provide “no legal authority and the only legal authority they should be seeking is from the U.S. Congress, a U.S. President, and the U.S. Constitution.  Rep. Sessions said he was “breathless” by  Panetta’s statements.

Panetta said that when it comes to the National Defense of this country, [Obama] the President of the United States, has the authority under the Constitution to act to defend this country and if it comes – and “we will” – if it comes to whether we are trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in and work in Bosnia – operate as we did in Libya – Afghanistan – then we want to do it with NATO or the international community.

So, did Panetta state that he and Obama have absolute power over YOUR sons and daughters, who are in the military, to do with whatever they want and deploy them anywhere in the world without Congressional authority and globalize the U.S. military without the consent of the American people and authorization of the U.S. Congress?  Congress is paid wages by We The People to represent Americans, not relinquish our sovereignty and the laws established for 235 years rooted into the U.S. Constitution.  It is immoral, and should be illegal and unconstitutional to use America’s troops for deployment anywhere in the world without the authority of the U.S. Congress and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, to whom the military swears their allegiance, and in accordance with the will of the U.S. Citizens, who must pick up the tab for war, as well as sacrifice their loved ones and suffer the losses when they occur.

In other words, did Panetta state that he and Obama view congress as meaningless and the U.S. Constitution as meaningless and their allegiance is to NATO, the U.N., the E.U., and international powers, not the citizens of the United States of America who pay their wages?

The country is established by the founders who become the Fathers of that nation, such as the Forefathers, who establish the original set of Constitutional laws, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights rooted into the Ten Commandments and the Law of Nations, which shall be passed down to U.S. Natural Born and Native citizens from their fathers for the preservation of the country, not foreign-born inhabitants, born to one or both foreign-born parents, who are known as naturalized citizens and foreigners permitted to settle and live in the country peacefully alongside the U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the book, ‘The Law of Nations,” pub. by Emerald de Vatell, pub. 1758; which is rooted into our U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, it states, “Right of the Citizens, when the nation submits to a foreign power,” (Chapter XVI, 175).   It states, “In the case of a real subjection power, the citizens who do not approve this change are not obliged to submit to it.  They ought to be allowed to sell their effects and retire elsewhere.  For my having to enter into a society does not oblige me to follow its face when it dissolves itself in order to submit to a foreign dominion.  I submitted to the society as it then was, to live in that society as a member of a sovereign state and not in another.  I am bound to obey it while it remains a political society, but when it diverts itself of the quality in order to receive its laws from another state, it breaks the bond of union between members and releases them from their obligation.”  In other words, the law of the land infers that U.S. Natural born and Native Citizens have the right to secede from the union and remove itself from the union legally and peacefully resisting a takeover by foreign powers or under the U.S. Constitution, remove those public servants from power who have surrendered their powers to foreign nations and pledged their allegiance to a foreign entity against the objections of the majority of U.S. Natural Born and Native American citizens.

According to the televised video of a congressional hearing of March 2012, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who answered questions of  Rep. Sessions, inferred that he and president Obama had the authority to deploy U.S. troops around the world without congressional authority and they would seek international permission of NATO, the U.N. or E.U., and may inform the U.S. Congress of their actions as they did in Libya.

Where then should the blame fall, on the executive office, or the congressional leaders, for failing in their fiduciary duty to properly vet a U.S, President under Article II; and secondly for not holding him accountable, when he fired off 220 Tomahawks at Libya at a cost of about $600,000 each, passed onto the American taxpayers?  How many freedom fighters in Libya depended on our help, but were met with Tomahawks, which created their disillusionment, when they witnessed civilian men, women, children killed as well as  Gaddafi’s grandkids, and his 16-year old son and friends.   How is this any different then the U.S. soldier who killed 17 Afghans while they slept and the White House calling out “murder” before an investigation took place?  At the very least, shouldn’t congress have suspended Obama and Panetta, while congress performed their fiduciary duty and investigated the actions taken in Libya on behalf of the military and  the American people as it is their fiduciary to uphold just and fair actions against American citizens or foreign nations.

Consequently, it isn’t just the fact that Obama and Panetta claimed attacking Libya was only a “mission,” but it’s also the fact that the U.S. Constitution requires that America must be under threat or attacked before attacking a foreign nation.   How is it that Libya didn’t threaten or attack America, yet the Obama administration fired off 220 Tomahawks at taxpayer’s expense, which cost the lives of innocent people, as they by-passed congress and the constitution?  For example, we should ask if the attack on Libya without oversight is any different from Obama funding Fast and Furious under the watch of Eric Holder,  without oversight, which cost the lives of U.S. agents, Mexican police, and thousands of innocent foreigners. It is immoral to think, oh well, the lives of the victims, whether legal or not, is worth the price.  If the government were to add up the number of people who died in Libya and Mexico at the hand of the U.S. government since 2008 versus 3,000 lives on 911 – what would that number be?

Furthermore, isn’t this exactly why oversight is established and written into the U.S. Constitution?  Isn’t the fact that abuse of power can’t be monitored if congress grants one man or  2 men the right to knight themselves with  absolute power as if they pledged their allegiance to the British Queen?  Obama called the attack on Libya,  a “mission.” and said he didn’t need congressional authority because there wouldn’t be boots on the ground and the mission would only take but a few days.  Today, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken control of Libya and established Sharia Law, so why did we attack Libya and assassinate an unarmed foreign leader who didn’t threaten the U.S. if we couldn’t deliver freedom to the citizens of Libya? Shall we ponder if the  answer lies in the fact that if Gaddafi had been captured alive, it may have set off questions as to the constitutional and legal justification for the attack as required by constitutional law?

In conclusion,  if the congress continues to approve absolute power to Obama and Panetta, then they are failing, in their duty to country.  If congress allows this pattern of self-government, without congressional authority to continue, which could establish a consistent pattern,  it could be the “legal basis” that Panetta and Obama are seeking to exercise and claim that they have absolute authority to declare war and deploy U.S. troops anywhere in the world without congressional authority, based on the fact there wasn’t any opposition by congress or the citizens. This unconstitutional behavior could lead to spreading our military troops too thin and creating a financial burden upon the American taxpayers.

Furthermore, if  the presidential executive office continues to assassinate foreign leaders because they “think” specific foreign leaders are “evil” people, then who in America is next to be targeted as an enemy, based upon their opinion?  America has leaders, who foreign nations believe are evil, so what’s the difference should foreign leaders  conspire to attack America’s leaders if we’re behaving in the same manner?

How then does congress justify that the Obama administration and the 112th Congress is denying the American people their constitutional right to exercise Due Process of Law since they voted to deny Due Process of Law  rendering Americans helpless by shredding Article IV of the U.S. Constitution and approving the unconstitutional and tyrannical law known as NDAA?  By the way, what’s the difference between a law that allows public servants to place them on a “hit” list versus the mafia creating a hit list knowing innocent people will die without a trial?  Even a guilty person should be given a trial!  In fact, our laws are based upon just laws that allow even the guilty to defend themselves until now.  The NDAA law has caused the American people to fear their government and places mistrust of the federal government in their minds.  The NDAA law places grave doubt in the minds of the citizens knowing that the government is spying on Americans as  potential targets of their own government for indefinite detention and assassination based upon an accusation only.  By the way, how is that even legal in America?  It is the love of country of our natural-born and native-born fathers who preserve the laws and pass them onto their U.S. Natural Born children or Native born children for the preservation of our culture, lifestyle, and laws.  Shame on the U.S. Congress for not invoking their powers and agreeing to shred Article IV, Due Process of Law, that targets Americans who pay their wages!  Americans didn’t agree to pay their wages and provide them jobs and retirement in exchange to suspend or shred and replace constitutional law, but to uphold, defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution.

Click the like button and leave a comment, please.  You may share this blog with anyone and check out my website which includes my bio, awards, videos, photos, laws I’ve proposed, and my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse” on Amazon or visit   Disclaimer:  Nothing said in this blog is meant to be legal, political, medical, or financial advice but a dissemination of information for educational purposes only. www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

Thanks for the read…..

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Legend: How The Christian Dinosaurs Became Extinct!

Posted on March 7, 2012 by

 Rose Colombo (C) 2010 Rev. 3/6/2012

Once upon a time, God created the dinosaurs and these gigantic creatures were playful and lived peacefully upon the earth. The earth was filled with dinosaurs of all shapes and sizes. These were herbivorous reptiles who ruled the earth.  In fact, many of the dinosaurs stood taller than the Twin Towers, but like the Twin Towers, they no longer exist. According to this fictional legend, the dinosaurs roamed peacefully upon the earth.   In fact, the legend  reveals that they believed in traditional values and traditional families.  The dinosaurs were loyal to their nation’s laws which were rooted in Judeo-Christian beliefs.  They believed in freedom, liberty, and individualism, not collectivism.  Every dinosaur believed that God commanded a female and a male to become one and go forth and be fruitful and populate the earth with more dinosaurs. Instinctively, these giant creatures roamed the earth and guarded their nation from anti-dinosaur enemies.  God warned the dinosaurs that they must protect their Judeo-Christian nation or they could be seduced by an evil reptilian creature who intended to lead them away from God.  He said the evil creature would make false promises because he wanted to gain power and control over their nation.

But like all nations, they let their guard down from time to time, after all, they had no reason to be fearful, so they didn’t anticipate any change.  But, one day, a very attractive dinosaur with an exaggerated long neck and magnificent smile appeared as if he’d arrived from the exotic Middle East on a magical flying carpet made of the finest silk. The carpet seemed to have been designed just for him with all the intricate designs and colors of the rainbow.  Although, he was a stranger in town, the citizens didn’t question him, after all, he appeared confident, somewhat arrogant, but quite pleasant.  So, the  dinosaurs went about their daily chores.  The mommy dinosaurs prepared dinner for their families while the daddy dinosaurs spent their day hunting for food and water.  The male dinosaurs worked hard to make sure there was more than a seven day  supply of food to store in their kitchen cupboards. Of course, there were young married dinosaur couples with children because they were pro-life.  The mommy dinosaurs always breast-fed their babies since there weren’t any modern-day conveniences at that time.

Furthermore, the youth in every village, between the ages of 18-25,  volunteered  for the Dinosaur National Civilian Security Force and guarded the nation’s borders.  In every village, the young male and female dinosaurs marched back and forth decked out in red, white and blue, shirts.  They were trained to help keep the Judeo-Christian dinosaur-communities safe.  Every community was led by a community organizer who held classes and taught self-defense techniques.  Every community street was lined with tall  sturdy trees whose willowy branches flowed with lush green leaves.  A colorful array of wild flowers and fruit trees grew in the front yards of the brick houses that lined the streets. It wasn’t unusual to see the dinosaur kids picking the fruit and the fresh red and blue berries that tasted as sweet as a teaspoon of sugar.  Also, it wasn’t unusual for the mommy dinosaurs to proudly walk their dinosaur kids to the towering waterfalls, which filled the crystal clear lakes, where they could play and bathe on a warm sunny day.  Fortunately, the dinosaur families  didn’t have to worry about social service agents knocking on their doors and taking away their children back in those days.  In fact, they didn’t have to worry about their kids being kidnapped or harmed in any way.  Life was simple.  Dinosaurs helping dinosaurs.

One afternoon, many of the dinosaurs felt a drop in the temperature which was unusual for that time of the year and climate change became a concern for them.  Obviously, they were concerned about the climate change because any drastic change in the weather could create global warming or global freezing.  Of course, they didn’t have to worry about sky rocketing electricity back in the day because there wasn’t any electricity to worry about, just the sun and the moon.  In fact, they usually enjoyed the warmth of the sunshine, while seeking shade beneath the tall lush green trees.  The dinosaurs stood so tall that when they looked up at the sky and the clouds, they felt the warmth of the sun shining its light through the leaves and the subtle wind blowing on their faces. The dinosaurs survived and thrived in warm temperatures.  In fact, they lived healthy vibrant lives. Natural organic fruits and vegetables that contained nutrients, vitamins, and minerals were plentiful and they munched on the plants and the ripened fresh fruits and berries. Some times, papa dinosaur would appear after a hard day’s work and he’d arrive home carrying a colorful bouquet of  flowers for mommy dinosaur. Female dinosaurs easily blushed and the attention of their male dinosaur put a smile on their faces.  Life was simple.

As time went by, the temperature continued to drop, but so slight that the dinosaurs hardly noticed the difference.  On the other hand, the dinosaurs, who owned farm land, were very concerned about the climate change knowing their organic crops, the animals, food supply, and water  supply, would be susceptible to increased prices from farm to market.  In fact, the dinosaurs never gave any thought to the fact that a foreigner would ever attempt to use the climate change and food or water supply as a tool to infiltrate and steal their dinosaur nation. Yet, the dinosaurs didn’t say much about the climate change because they felt most of the population would call them “crazy” or “conspiracy theorists.”

After all, they figured if they just remained silent then maybe their new leader would become more compassionate.  One of the blessings of living in the beginning of time was the fact that the dinosaurs didn’t have to  worry about chemicals or pesticides sprayed on their natural food supplies that could harm their health.  Everything in the environment supplied by Mother Nature was pure and the waters were crystal clear. The food and water supply didn’t contain any harmful chemicals or high levels of fluoride.  The dinosaurs lived the good life.  Everything on the earth was new and the environment was natural and pure.

But, one morning, a messenger delivered a notice to every home in the village encouraging every dinosaur to attend a very important meeting in the center of the village.  After dinner, the dinosaurs curiously scurried into the center of the village for a Town Hall meeting.  And, to everyone’s surprise, the audience was informed that they would be listening to a very special guest speaker.  The Mayor of the dinosaur village introduced the most mysterious and magnificent dinosaur the villagers had ever seen.  The mayor invited him up on the stage and he hurriedly walked up to the microphone. The magnificent dinosaur’s wide gleaming smile, youthful appearance, and charming personality excited the audience.  As he began to speak, his voice resonated like soft cotton and rang out in a soothing tone that appeared to hypnotize the audience.  The dinosaurs listened intently as if they had been sprinkled with fairy dust and had fallen into a hypnotic trance.

The stranger in the night instructed the audience to look up at the light and see the light shining down upon him.  The audience looked up and there was silence as their eyes appeared to be glazed over, but they didn’t seem to realize that the light shining down upon them was the full moon that was exceptionally bright that night and blinding them. He spoke with a slick velvet tongue.  He said, “Vote for me and I will save the dinosaur nation from ending up in poverty.  You won’t have to face poverty, famine, or drought, due to the climate change.  You need me as your leader.  I can provide everything you need.  You never have to worry about spending your days in the wilderness searching for food and water. He said, “ Can we ‘redistribute’ the wealth so everyone has a fair share?”  Suddenly, the dinosaurs believed they were about to suffer if they didn’t vote for the stranger in the night, so they stood up, and they began chanting, ”Yes, we can! Yes, we can!”

After the meeting, a male dinosaur who was a news reporter, was so enamored by the magnificent dinosaur that he blurted out,”He sends chills tingling up my leg.” The reporter’s comment caused the male dinosaurs to wonder about the magnificent dinosaur’s sexual preference, but not enough to ask any questions.  There was a second  male reporter, who appeared to bow down, when he was introduced to the magnificent dinosaur.  And, a female reporter wrote,  ”I couldn’t help but admire his  glistening pectorals.”  The stranger in the night hypnotically won over the citizens and the entire dinosaur media, except for the one television station, who used the opportunity to bring the dinosaurs under their wing and appeared to oppose the new leader, which helped skyrocket their ratings, but over time, they began to bow down as well.

The magnificent dinosaur, introduced as, Mr. Obanasaurus, appeared as a calm likable and benevolent savior.  He said that he believed in traditional marriage, plus, he was a male dinosaur married with children. Somehow, he managed to avoid revealing his background and managed to slip through the cracks and diminish the need for the public to ask any personal questions. Mr. Obanasaurus was able to mesmerize the audience and place fear in their minds by suggesting the possibility of a national economic crisis.  He presented his ”Chicken Little” story to the audience when he began shouting, “The sky is falling!  The sky is falling!’  And, the audience bought it hook, line, and sinker. Mr. Obanasaurus won hands down based upon his misrepresentations.  It was too late to make any difference by the time the researchers learned that he was leading two different lifestyles.  He led a public  lifestyle as married with children and a secret lifestyle and secret same-sex lovers, as well.  He didn’t disclose that during his childhood, he was exposed to transgender and cross dressing lifestyles, by his nanny. The voters also weren’t told that his associates and mentors, were anti-Judea-Christian and anti-conservative, anti-traditional marriage, and anti-freedom and liberty.  If the truth had been revealed of his opposition to their lifestyle during the campaign then the Judea-Christian dinosaur nation would not have voted him into office, but it was too late.

In the beginning, the Judea-Christian dinosaurs believed he was one of them!  The dinosaurs were excited when they voted for their new dinosaur leader.  In fact, they viewed Mr. Obanasaurus as a rock star dinosaur, who promised to bring hope and change, to their dinosaur nation and make their lives easier.  The following day, a citizen named Peggysaurus was confronted by a news reporter and asked if she would vote for Mr. Obanasaurus.  Peggysaurus said, ”Mr. Obanasaurus is  going to provide for all my needs. No dinosaur will ever have to work again.”

The dinosaurs, who failed to ask questions,  voluntarily voted for Mr. Obanasaurus, and they elected him by an overwhelming voluntary popular vote at 98%. The people were ready to turn their environment around, after all, Mr. Obanasaurus, the magnificent dinosaur promised to provide food, water, and health care for every family if they voted for him.  Fear of  an economic collapse was the driving force that won their vote.  The dinosaurs happily cheered for Mr. Obanasaurus and chanted ”Yes, we can,” but they never bothered to ask, “Yes, we can do what?” Instead, tears flowed from their eyes because they believed he was the “one.” Although, there were dinosaurs trying to warn the masses, it was as if the masses couldn’t hear them and they’d fallen into a hypnotic trance and ended up blinded by his magnificence.

After the elections, Mr. Obanasaurus swore an oath to uphold the original laws of the land which had been established for at least 235 years.  After he took office, he supplied natural organic food and clean water.  He guaranteed a natural national health care program provided for all the dinosaurs, so he kept that promise and the younger dinosaurs trusted him. But, after a while, the dinosaurs were surprised when Mrs. Obanasaurus showed up on the scene and said that the dinosaurs would have to accept the “change” they would be implementing and proceeded to inform the dinosaur citizens that she would decide what they can or cannot eat and drink.  The dinosaur citizens were shocked. It didn’t take long before Mr. Obanasaurus began rationing, food, water, and healthcare as well as issuing mandates.  He declared that if the dinosaurs failed to comply with his mandates, they would be punished for non-compliance.

He firmly informed the dinosaurs that his unvested Obanasaurus Czars were keeping a list of names of every dinosaur and they would track every dinosaur who failed to  comply with the mandates.  He said that every dinosaur would be labeled and spied upon by a color coded system which was similar to the color coding system used in the  dinosaur prisons.  He boldly stated that he granted himself the power to rule by mandates and granted himself the power to  assassinate any dinosaur he felt was his enemy.  His assassination mandate was based upon his accusation only, not probable cause, and the unelected and elected lawmakers known as the Obanasaurus-czars did nothing to stop him from violating his sworn oath. He informed the masses  that they no longer had the right to defend themselves.

Remember, the majority of  Judea-Christian dinosaurs believed the promises made by Mr. Obanasaurus.  They believed that he would keep his sworn oath to uphold, defend, protect, and preserve the established laws of the Judeo-Christian nation, but he did not.  Yet, the dinosaur czars remained silent.  It appeared as if the masses worshipped him on one hand, but on the other hand, it may be that they feared him.  Unfortunately, they failed to impeach Mr. and Mrs. Obanasaurus from circumventing the dinosaur’s original constitutional laws established by the Founders when they formed the United  Dinosaur Nation which had been preserved for 235 years.  In fact, Mr. Obanasaurus was so bold that he had no problem stating that the dinosaur’s Judeo-Christian constitutional laws were “meaningless.”

For example, any dinosaur family who cheated and stored more than 7 days of food in their kitchen cupboards could be a suspected enemy  and thrown into indefinite detention centers that were named, Femasaurus Camps, where the accused dinosaurs would stay until they rotted away.  No one knew what they did to the detained dinosaurs in the Femasaurus Camps because they were secret facilities without the right of the detained dinosaurs to contact the outside world.  The detained dinosaurs weren’t allowed to visit with anyone, so the family members of the detained dinosaurs’ were distressed.

The rest of the dinosaurs began worrying if they had been duped by Mr. Obanasaurus and his wife, who swore an oath to uphold the freedom and liberty for all Judeo-Christian dinosaurs. The dinosaurs were coming to the realization that they didn’t know anything about Mr.and Mrs. Obanasaurus before the elections and never bothered to ask any questions.  Their leaders failed to perform their fiduciary duty to the dinosaur citizens and they failed to vet their leader prior to the elections. They even refused to correct the record after they were informed he wasn’t vetted properly. .

Dinosaur Snitch Program

It wasn’t long afterwards, that the dinosaur students in attendance at their  public schools, which were supported with tax dollars, were ordered into the auditorium.  They were excited.  They had been informed that a special guest speaker, Mrs. Obanasaurus, would talk to them about nutrition. But, to their dismay, she surprised them. She informed the audience that moving forward, she would be in charge of what they eat as snacks.  She said, I shall decide which snacks they will be allowed to eat or drink. There are too many fat dinosaurs wobbling around this nation.”   She commented, “In fact all snacks must be approved by me and President Obanasaurus.  So, you are on notice that myself and the head of security will be visiting  the public schools randomly and making sure you are reporting everyone who cheats.

A mandate was published that informed everyone that the punishment for a first time cheater consisted of a warning, but a second offense would result in punishment, and a third offense would result in a “penalty” and the parents would be ordered to pay up or else!  The penalty would be called a ”tax” but isn’t a tax, and there was the possibility of indefinite detention at a Femasaurus Camp.  She said that the offenders who ended up at the Femasaurus Camps would be counseled and trained on how to comply with the new snitch snack program.  The student dinosaurs and educators were told that they could only store a minimal amount of  approved food and water in their school lunches or else!

In fact, there were whispers that some parents of the student dinosaurs were finding themselves in trouble for growing their own vegetables or fruits and if caught storing rain water on their own property!  The dinosaurs were encouraged to spy on each other, as well as, parents and teachers who they were ordered to report. Ironically, the dinosaurs were upset when they saw a photo of Mrs. Obanasaurus and her security director, shortly afterwards, chomping on a double cheeseburger, fries, a malt, and a slice of apple pie!

Thereafter, dinosaur teachers and principals were stunned when they received instructions from Mr. Obanasaurus on the implementation of his new school program which promotes same-sex lifestyle indoctrination under the guise of education.  The dinosaurs began to wonder if these same-sex mandates into public schools are a part of his concealed past which they felt could reflect his personal lifestyle and agendas. After all, he didn’t disclose his current intent prior to the elections.  Mr. Obanasaurus informed the dinosaur educators and parents that he mandated same-sex curriculums into the public schools and  that he included punishment for non-compliance.  But, he wasn’t satisfied with just public schools, he intended to trample on the rights of private schools, as well.  He granted himself the power to send any Judeo-Christian dinosaur, who failed to comply with his mandate, to a  Femasaurus Camp, and/or mandate that the dinosaurs pay a penalty.

After awhile, the dinosaurs began questioning if Mr. Obanasaurus had a troubled childhood.  They began researching alternative news and learned that he resented his dad, who was married to a woman with kids in a foreign nation, and he felt rejected by his dad. He  didn’t resemble his mother at all, but he wrote that he resented his mother’s species.  So, the dinosaurs, who were of the same species as his mother,  began to question if he came to punish them.  They whispered about his emotional stability since former news articles popped up revealing his mentors to be radicals.  His associates and mentors  believed in a specific ideology which was in opposition to a free Judea-Christian dinosaur nation.  In fact, they viewed his mother’s species as oppressive.

The dinosaur main stream news concealed that their new leader had spent an excessive amount of time during  his youth being mentored by radical dinosaurs, who believed it was their duty, to change the dinosaur  nation and steal their land from them.  It appears that Mr. and Mrs. Obanasaurus and their mentors and czars weren’t for them, but against them.  They were brainwashed with extreme ideologies since childhood, which explained his passion, gravitating  in a direction, which reflected his statement that he and other nations find his mother’s species oppressive. The educated dinosaurs theorized that the resentment Mr. Obanasaurus  felt against his mother’s species could be a serious unresolved resentment, as well as a problem for the Judea-Christian dinosaur nation.  He appeared to be harboring a very deep resentment inside of him.

Consequently, the elder dinosaurs discussed these problems amongst themselves.  They pondered if Mr. Obanasaurus harbored resentment towards his mother’s species since childhood and if it  stemmed from the fact that she wasn’t around much.  Stories surfaced stating that his mom left him with a transgender cross dressing nanny, so could this have stirred the resentment towards his mother’s species as he grew up.  As more information surfaced, the information reported was dismal.  These reports supported that Mr. Obanasaurus favored radical viewpoints, which were anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Constitutional law.

The elder dinosaurs remarked, “We believe that his rigid leadership may be a result of his convoluted childhood.”  One retired professor stated, “Perhaps, his  childhood experiences may have lit a spark deep inside of him – a hidden spark – simmering since his  youth.  Building up resentment.  Boiling like a volcano.  Perhaps, his unseen volcanic emotions are about to erupt.  And, maybe, his agendas are to depopulate his mother’s species, lifestyle, and religious roots.  After all, they learned that he was obsessed with aborting his mother’s species and reducing their population in the future through mandated abortions.

Nevertheless, the dinosaurs were shocked as well as the educators, when Mr. Obanasaurus informed them of his same-sex mandates.  One elder dinosaur shook his head and said, “He’s circumventing the original established laws of the dinosaur nation”  He said, “He is changing our traditions of traditional marriage.”  Another male dinosaur raised his voice and said, “He is denying our dinosaur nation the freedom to choose, freedom of religion, and the right to life by writing new laws which replace our nation’s laws.”  They sat silent.

The Obanasaurus-czars approved same-sex curriculum for little dinosaurs, who were barely out of diapers, which robbed these minor dinosaurs of their innocence.  This action spoke to the character of their leader and the Obanasaurus-czars.  Could it be that they were voting for their own sexual preference lifestyles? After all, most political candidates presented themselves as Judea-Christians and married with children, when they were candidates seeking office, and the dinosaur voters believed them. But, if they believe in traditional marriage and freedom to choose, then how is it that they’ve denied the heterosexual and Christian dinosaur parents the right to opt out of the same-sex programs?

Unfortunately, dinosaur teachers feared losing their jobs and they feared punishment.  The dinosaur teachers would sit around the lunch table each day and mumble, “I don’t want to teach same-sex lifestyles to little children.  They don’t need to know about sexual lifestyles at such a tender age, but I’m afraid of losing my job.”

The male dinosaurs held secret meetings and wondered if Mr. Obanasaurus, who promoted same-sex curriculum into public schools could have been implemented with the intent of diminishing the Judea-Christian religion, beliefs, God, traditional marriage, pro-creation, and the Ten Commandments as well as their bible. The dinosaur pastors said, “This is a very sad time in our nation as pastors are being arrested for praying on public sidewalks!”

Consequently, many of the wise old dinosaurs, who formerly led their nation, feared that Mr. Obanasaurus intended to reduce the population of Judea-Christian dinosaurs by his mandated abortions, promoting herbs that prevented pregnancy and new herbs that caused the unborn baby dinosaurs to be aborted and simultaneously implemented same-sex curriculums throughout the dinosaur nation as well as in their national dinosaur military force.

The elder dinosaurs warned the younger dinosaurs that one dinosaur can make a difference for good or for evil in the world. They warned their youth that they must not be fearful and it is their duty to resist peacefully against the possible over throw of the established constitutional laws that provided freedom and liberty.  One leader stated, “It is important that all dinosaur citizens write letters to their leaders and politely, but firmly, resist the mandates that deny freedom and liberty.

Of course, fear was their greatest enemy whenever a tyrant/s comes on the scene.  There was a sigh of sadness that resonated like a sound of music from the elders for they realized the consequences, if the dinosaurs didn’t resist peacefully. The elder dinosaur stated, “Look, if God had intended for the earth to be void of baby dinosaurs and children then he wouldn’t have created one male and one female dinosaur for procreation. He would have made it so all females couldn’t bear children.”  God would not have instructed his children to go forth and populate the earth and to be fruitful.

Of course, the dinosaur pastors of the Judeo-Christian churches spoke out in defense of pro-life for the unborn baby dinosaurs, but Mr. Obanasaurus ordered their arrest.  Nonetheless, the dinosaur pastors stated that same-sex education and indoctrination shouldn’t be mandated, but voluntary.  Same sex indoctrination under the guise of education should be an individual’s choice or offered to college age students.  The elders believed that all dinosaur parents should be allowed the freedom to choose, exercise parental and religious rights, but Mr. Obanasaurus said, no way!  He was creating a nation of collectivism, not individualism.  In fact, Mr. Obananasaurus denied opt outs for parents, even if they stated it was against their religious, spiritual or moral beliefs. The only dinosaurs who could opt out, or exclude themselves, or obtain waivers, were dinosaurs who favored  his programs.

As time marched on, Mr. Obanasaurus became more arrogant and demanding.  He shocked the dinosaur parents when he informed them that he was de-funding educational basics such as Calculus, algebra II, P.E., English, Computer Science, Arts, Music, police safety, and a full-time nurse on school grounds, but he approved funding for same-sex indoctrination classes under the guise of education and he would continue to fund mandated abortion clinics, as well as, the installation of  vending machines into every public school.  The parents were surprised when he stated that the vending machines were not to be filled with snacks but stocked with condoms, contraceptives, and the morning after abortion pill.  The  dinosaurs were so fearful of  being sent to the Femasaurus Camps and indefinitely detained that they said and did nothing.  Fear paralyzed the dinosaurs.  The elders began to think that Mr. Obanasaurus and his unvested Obanasaurus czars were creating a Prison Industrial Complex for-profit to warehouse Judeo-Christian dinosaurs who were non-compliant.

Dinosaur Mandated Government Ordered Abortions

As time went by and the temperatures continued to drop,  food and water supplies were affected.  Of course, the dinosaurs began to worry. But, instead of addressing their concerns, Mr. Obanasaurus issued a shocking order stating the Obanasaurus-czars set up a committee.  He said that under his Dinosaur Health Care Bill that the menstrual cycles of all young female dinosaurs must be monitored every month. He stated, I have implemented worldwide mandated abortions and the prevention of pregnancy by mandated contraceptives under the guise of reducing poverty and saving the planet.”

He said, “I am increasing taxes to redistribute the United Dinosaur Nation’s  wealth to ensure that mandated abortions are implemented as the new health care bill mandates that the government decides who will give birth and who will not give birth.”

But, he didn’t stop there and not one dinosaur czar used their authority to repeal his orders. They were totally in compliance with his mandates and punishments.  Under his Dinosaur National Health Care bill, Mr. Obanasaurus granted himself the authority to ration or deny health care, food, water, and the authority to order any dinosaur, innocent or guilty without charge, without a lawyer, and without a trial, to be indefinitely detained in a  Femasaurus camp if they were non-compliant, based on an accusation only.  Guilty as Accused!

The dinosaurs were shocked when they learned that Mr. Obanasaurus made it extremely difficult to leave the Femasaurus Camps because they had guards and double bobbed wire and locked doors made of heavy steel.  Mr. Obanasaurus ordered that every baby dinosaur and dinosaur child be microchipped by mandated vaccinations without the right of parents to opt out. The dinosaurs were confounded by the failure of the Obanasaurus-czars, who remained silent, while approving laws which circumvented the laws they swore to uphold.  They circumvented the will of the majority of dinosaur citizens.

Obviously, the dinosaurs began suffering from post-traumatic distresses because they placed their trust in the Obanasaurus-czars, who swore an oath to uphold,  defend, preserve, and protect the freedom and liberty, of the Judea-Christian dinosaur-nation, but instead, the Obanasaurus-czars enjoyed the Cornhusker soup, drank the Gatorade, and played games, made backroom deals, and took bribes for votes.  They sold out the dinosaurs and the dinosaur nation because of their “greed.”

The Dinosaur’s Mandated Obanasaurus Health Care Program

After Mr. Obanasaurus implemented the Dinosaur National Health Care program against the will of the  majority of dinosaur.  Patients would be assessed according to their age, health and cost to the federal government which would be decided by his Council of nine Obanasaurus Czars. They would determine if a patient would be of little value or worth to the federal government or of value and worth.  In fact,  Mr. Obanasaurus ordered a study, titled, “The Study on Dinosaur Capital,” which assessed a human being’s worth and profitability to the federal government and Wall Street.  In other words, individual dinosaurs would be viewed as commodities for-profit or for devaluation.  Under his Dinosaur National Health Care plan, the Obanasaurus-czars would decide if they would deny services or ration services to patients. They would decide if they would send the indigent, sick, disabled, elderly, old guard military dinosaurs to early end of life counseling.  The government counselors would explain how it would be beneficial to the rest of the younger and healthier dinosaurs if the government pulled the plug and those patients  died a little earlier than God intended.  And, as an added benevolent act – convince those patients to donate their organs for research which would save government researchers millions of dollars.  They informed them not to worry about their dinosaur kids and grandkids, who are left behind, as the government would take good care of them

Consequently, the most pro-abortion dinosaur to have ever hit the United Dinosaur Nation implemented mandated abortions against the will of the majority of the Judea-Christian dinosaurs.  The young female pregnant dinosaurs would be ordered to be evaluated by a government psychiatrist.  The Reptilian psychiatrist would present his psychiatric evaluation to the Council of nine Obamasaurus czars, and upon their review, they would determine if the female dinosaur could give birth or must visit the Frankenstein Abortion Clinic, and their abortionists, Dr. Reptilian.

Of Course, there wasn’t any reason to worry if a botched abortion occurred.  The staff sought the assistance from the Department Chair, Dr. Emanuel le Reptilian.  Dr. le Reptilian would send for his staff , which included, ”Puff the Magic Dragon, and in one big puff – the baby dinosaur was snuffed out before he or she took their first breath, successfully resolving any botched abortions while keeping the seamless assembly line moving along.  But, after 10-20 years, the Judea-Christian natural-born dinosaur population was diminished making the Judea-Christian Natural Born Citizens, the minority, in their own land as Mr. Obanasaurus allowed dinosaurs from foreign lands to migrate into their land.

Unfortunately, as time passed, it just got worse.  Dr Emmanuel le Reptilian figured out how to reduce the Judeo-Christian dinosaur population at a faster pace. It came to his attention that the Obanasaurus-czars could choose who would be aborted by targeting a specific gender, race, ethnicity, nation, or religion. The reptilian abortionists would stab the baby dinosaurs in the head and suck out their brains and if the baby lived because of a botched abortion, then the reptilian abortionists would leave the baby dinosaur to die.  A dinosaur once wrote in stone, ”But, you don’t need to kill some thing if it isn’t alive.” In fact, Mr. Obanasaurus was pro-infanticide, pro-partial birth abortion, and pro-mandated abortions, because he believed that he had the authority to choose who will live and who will die.

As the Judeo-Christian dinosaurs became desperate for a solution, they began to meet in secret hiding places.  They tried to figure out the true identity of Mr. Obanasaurus, a stranger who suddenly appeared on stage in the Judea-Christian dinosaur nation without any identification only four years earlier.  No one dared ask him for his identification papers because they feared being punished under the new laws that he enacted.  Mr. Obanasaurus wrote a law which stated that he could accuse anyone of being an ”enemy”of the state and indefinitely detain any dinosaur without charges filed in one of the many secret Femasaurus Camps that he had secretly built around the nation without their knowledge.  Unfortunately, it was becoming too late for the Judea-Christians to change course.  It appeared as if their own Dinosaur National Civilian Security Force had been rendered helpless and their laws made “meaningless.”

Consequently, Mr. Obanasaurus successfully mandated the abortion of millions of would have been future dinosaur Judea-Christian, natural-born citizens, and reduced the population by millions and rationalized the deaths of millions of unborn baby dinosaurs as justifiable under the guise of saving the planet and reducing poverty.

Mandated Punishment of Female Dinosaurs for Non-Compliance

The result of the government’s mandated abortions of unborn baby dinosaurs resulted in more deaths of pregnant women or mothers. If a  young mommy dinosaur attempted to conceal her pregnancy and gave birth or attempted to hide the baby girl dinosaur from the Obanasaurus-czars, it would result in an accusation of non-compliance and  an automatic guilty verdict and the female dinosaur would be put to death. Every mandate that Mr. Obanasuaur implemented included punishment for non-compliance. In fact, outside of the Obanasaurus ”Court of No Justice,” the dinosaurs were guilty as accused and a “death mobile” made of the finest dinosaur bones and reptilian skins awaited the defendants.  No, they didn’t have to be guilty, only accused by the Obanasaurus-czars.

Ironically, the  magnificent dinosaur with a fantastic smile, whose identity was never vetted, but known as Mr. Obanasaurus, ruled with an iron fist.  Eventually, he denied all freedom and liberty to the remaining dinosaurs.  In fact, Mr. Obanasaurus monitored the thoughts of the dinosaurs who ended up living the rest of their days in fear of their leader.  Their Dinosaur nation wasn’t taken over by bombs, because there weren’t any bombs at that time.  Sadly, the dinosaurs overwhelmingly and  voluntarily had voted for the stranger in the night, whose charm mesmerized them as well as blinded them.  But in the end, he stole their Dinosaur nation and he prohibited the dinosaurs from practicing their  Judeo-Christian religion.  He reduced the population of natural-born female dinosaurs citizens and created a nation of same-sex dinosaur citizens.  After 20 years, the majority of dinosaurs of marrying age were males, but there weren’t enough female dinosaurs of marrying age because they’d been aborted by the millions.  The result was that the Judea-Christian nation was stolen because the trusting Judea-Christian dinosaurs allowed an unidentified stranger to place fear in their minds and never asked for his credentials.  The trusting dinosaur voluntarily voted for “change” instead of guarding their nation from “change” and they unknowingly voted for “no” hope.

Depopulation of the Christian and Pro-Life Dinosaurs

Sadly, after 20 years or more, the earth began to freeze over and more pro-life dinosaurs died from famine, lack of water, lack of health care, and depopulation of unborn baby girl dinosaurs, as well as their desire to marry dinosaurs of the opposite sex.  They felt empty without their Judea-Christian religion, prayers, and bible, which Mr. Obanasaurus replaced with a foreign religion and incorporated into a political ideology.  He replaced their Judea-Christian roots, laws, traditions, lifestyle, religion, beliefs, history, and wiped out their civilization. On the other hand,  the Obanasaurus-czars didn’t devalue the fetuses of the heterosexual female dinosaurs which they stored for future profitability.   In fact, the  Obanasaurus-czars froze the fetuses for food; roasted the fetuses, ground the fetuses into food products, used the fetuses for  experimentation, stem cell research, harvesting organs, and cloning.  The reptilian abortionists headed up by Dr. Emanuel le Reptilian, and the Reptilian Scientists, were unable to continue with their work in the end.  They, too, died. And, their attempts at cloning the perfect species died with them.

After years of depopulating female unborn babies by mandated abortions, as written previously, there were thousands of male dinosaurs of marrying age, but no female dinosaurs of marrying age.  So, the Obanasaurus-czars indoctrinated the remaining male dinosaurs into same-sex relationships, but as the water and plants were frozen over due to climate change, the surviving male dinosaurs grew weaker and older.

Unfortunately, the Judeo-Christian dinosaurs waited too long to take back their nation. Mr. Obanasaurus immediately stripped them  of their freedom, liberty, the right to bear arms, religion, constitutional laws, traditions, roots, and “changed” their laws into mandates, which included cruel and unusual punishment, consisting of indefinite detention and assassinations based upon Mr. Obanasaurus’ accusations only.

In the end, there were only two male dinosaurs who survived for many years.  The last two male dinosaurs left their mark in stone as a warning to future generations.  Their bones are petrified in stone and the engraved stone stated, “Let this be a warning for future civilizations.  It is better to appreciate what God has provided and reject the “change” and “hope” of a better life promised by a stranger in the night, who fools a nation for his self-serving and self-protecting agendas which are intended for his personal, financial and political self-gain.  And, that’s how the Judea-Christian United Dinosaur Nation became extinct!

Click the star and like button – leave a comment -

1.  Call your congressman every day and inform them that you resist peacefully and they need to resist and REPEAL Obamacare; Mandated Abortions; the Patriot Act, and the NDAA law.  Save your nation’s constitutional laws for your kids and grandkids.

Remember, Mandates deny ”Due Process of Law” and trample on all three branches of government morphing all three branches into one branch of government as well as  trample on the Rule of Checks and Balances. In my book, “Fight Back Legal Abuse,” I state, ”Without Due Process of Law, there is nothing!  Nothing but tyranny.”  I also wrote, ”There is no justice, only decisions.”  It’s reported that Communist China mandated and aborted approximately 400,000,000 unborn babies, mostly girls in about 20 years!

(Disclaimer: This post is not to offend or support or oppose gay or heterosexual rights, but to awaken Americans, who cherish freedom and liberty guaranteed by the constitution. It’s possible that within 10 or 15 years, U.S. Citizens could wake up and discover after it’s too late, that the U.S. Natural Born Citizen is the minority living amongst a nation of foreign immigrants, illegals, and refugees enforcing their foreign cultures and ideologies and foreign religions and eliminating Western Civilization, Judeo-Christian beliefs and traditions, and the U.S. Constitution as well as removing U.S. History, and the nation’s 235 year old name, The United States of America. Mandates deny freedom and liberty and come with punishment for non-compliance.  It’s up to Americans to save millions of unborn babies, who are the  future, U.S. Natural Born Citizens.  Foreigners are over populating, while mandated abortions and same-sex indoctrination of kids, assassinating Americans, and indefinitely detaining Americans will reduce the population of future U.S. Natural Born Citizens, making U.S. Natural Born Citizens  the minority in their own nation within 15-20 years, and a nation could be stolen, without dropping one bomb!  Such a depopulation program could enslave the U.S. Natural born and legal citizens as immigrants, refugees, and illegals would be the majority after 10-20 years.  (Disclaimer: nothing said is meant to be legal or political, or medical advice, but a dissemination of  information for educational purposes only.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments